Newantiscalant
Newantiscalant
net/publication/254225608
CITATIONS READS
4 1,161
9 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Abdel Nasser A Mabrouk on 22 April 2015.
To cite this article: Amr Mohamed, Justin Robert, Abdel Nasser Mabrouk, Imteyaz Ahmad, Ahmed Nafey, J.S. Choi, J.K. Park,
Stephan Nied & Jurgen Detering (2012): New anti-scalant performance evaluation for MSF technology, Desalination and Water
Treatment, DOI:10.1080/19443994.2012.704701
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to
anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should
be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims,
proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in
connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Desalination and Water Treatment iFirst (2012) 1–6
www.deswater.com
1944-3994/1944-3986 Ó 2012 Desalination Publications. All rights reserved
doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.704701
Amr Mohameda,*, Justin Roberta, Abdel Nasser Mabrouka, Imteyaz Ahmada, Ahmed
Nafeya, J.S. Choia, J.K. Parka, Stephan Niedb, Jurgen Deteringb
a
Doosan Water R&D Center, Monarch Office Tower, Level 29th, Sh. Zayed Road, Dubai, UAE
Tel. +971 509758938; email: [email protected]
b
BASF SE, Care Chemicals & Formulators, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
Downloaded by [Dr Abdel Nasser Mabrouk] at 06:54 15 August 2012
ABSTRACT
The desalination industries are looking for the reduction in the unit cost of desalinated water
through developments in the technologies, process optimization, etc.; multi stage flash (MSF)
technology has a proven track record for high reliability in the tough seawater condition. One
of the technical barriers to improve the MSF system performance is the scale formation phe-
nomena. This phenomenon can be manipulated by nanofiltration or by chemical treatment
(anti-scalant). A pilot plant was constructed to evaluate the performance of a novel anti-scalant,
under high top brine temperature (TBT) condition. Techniques such as atomic absorption spec-
troscopy and X-ray diffraction are used to measure the scale deposition in the test sections. Dif-
ferent operation parameters such as TBT, salinity, dosing rate, and operation with/without ball
cleaning are considered. The experimental results indicate that the scale inhibition shows good
performance after 72 h even for a low dosing rate of 2.5 ppm.
Keywords: Multi stage flash; Anti-scalant; Top brine temperature; Scale formation
Presented at the International Conference on Desalination for the Environment, Clean Water and Energy, European Desalination
Society, 23–26 April 2012, Barcelona, Spain
2 A. Mohamed et al. / Desalination and Water Treatment
½iactual
Fig. 1. Doosan MSF desalination plant unit capacity Skillman index ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
ð x þ 4KSP xÞ103
2
evolution.
5
x ¼ j2:5½C2þ 1:04½SO2
4 j10
Fig. 2. Heat transfer resistances in MSF condenser. According to Linke et al. [3], the solubility product
constant (KSP) can be calculated as follows:
the frequency of ball cleaning, and the chemicals dosing
rate and steam consumption, which will lead to S ¼ 2:91 þ 0:003173T 8:193105 T 2
increase in OPEX. Fig. 2 shows typical heat transfer
resistances in an MSF condenser which consist of inner
(Ri) and outer (Ro) thermal resistances, wall thermal Several attempts have been made in the past to
resistance (Rw), and fouling (FF) water, and it is very increase the TBT of MSF desalination process, and
clear that fouling factor is the key element to enhance some of them are highlighted here. Al-Shammiri et al.
overall heat transfer coefficient. [4] reported that the nanofiltration inhibits CaSO4 scal-
Scale deposition in MSF consists of two types of ing by 99.1–96.98% according to recovery ratio with-
scale: hard scale and soft scale. The soft scale formed out adding any chemicals, nanofiltration has low
from CaCO3 which is amorphous and can be removed prevention for CaCO3 (5.3–23%), and also for all other
using sponge ball cleaning. The hard scale is mainly scaling salts, a great scaling inhibition was found
calcium sulfate resulted from the direct crystallization about 97.7% for BaSO4, 99.8% for SrSO4 scaling, and
due to supersaturation of anhydrite (CaSO4), hemihy- 94.86% inhibition for CaF. The reliability of this nano-
Fig. 7. SEM result at TBT = 120˚C, salinity 60 g/l, and dosing rate = 2.5 ppm.
A. Mohamed et al. / Desalination and Water Treatment 5
5.1. Assumptions
Mg
Fig. 9. Mg participation at TBT = 125˚C and salinity = 50 g/l. Fig. 10. Schematic diagram inside the scaled tubes.
6 A. Mohamed et al. / Desalination and Water Treatment
6. Conclusion
To study the performance of a new anti-scalant at
higher TBT corresponding to a once through and
brine recycling configurations of MSF desalination
Fig. 11. Fouling factor at 50 g/l salinity without ball system, an experimental setup was constructed in
cleaning. Changwon, Korea. Several experiments are conducted
for a set of operating conditions. It is understood from
ð3Þ Scale thickness ðmmÞ the experiments that the scale deposit is less, with ball
2 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi3 cleaning system compared to without ball cleaning.
Downloaded by [Dr Abdel Nasser Mabrouk] at 06:54 15 August 2012
di d2i pl4 VCa Similar trend is seen for all the conducted experiments
¼4 5
irrespective of the TBT, salinity, and dosing rate. The
2
Ca
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi scale precipitate obtained in the experiments is easy to
2 3
ðdi 2tCa Þ ðdi 2tCa Þ2 pl4 VMg remove (amorphous) by ball cleaning. The
þ4 5 performance of the new anti-scalant is promising for
2 24- and 72-h operation, and long-time experimental
Mg
operation (10 days test) is under processing.
2 C
ð4Þ Fouling factor m
W
2 3 2 di 2tCa
3 References
di
ln ln [1] A.E. Alrawajfeh, Influence of nanofiltration pretreatment on
6 di 2tCa 7 6 di 2ðtCa þ tMg Þ 7
¼6 4
7 þ6
5 4
7
5
scale deposition in multi stage flash thermal desalination
2pkl 2pkl plants, Thermal Sci. 15 (2011) 55–65.
[2] L. Skillman, J.P. McDonald, Jr., A. Simple, Accurate, fast
Ca Mg method for calculating calcium sulfate solubility in oil field
brine, Paper No. 906–14-I, Spring Meeting of the southwestern
District, Division of production, American Petroleum Institute,
Lubbuke, TX, USA, 1969.
where do, tube outer diameter; di, tube inner diameter; [3] W.F. Linke, A. Seidell, Solubility of Inorganic and Metal
t, tube thickness; l, tube length; tMg, magnesium scale Organic Compounds, 4th ed., Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New
thickness; tCa, calcium scale thickness. York, NY, 1965.
[4] M. Al-Shammiri, M. Ahmed, M. Al-Rageeb, Nanofiltration and
From AAS results, the Ca scale is mainly calcium sulfate limitation for top brine temperature in Gulf
formed from CaCO3 and magnesium is present as desalination plants, Desalination 167 (2004) 335–346.
Mg(OH)2. The following property values are used [5] O.A. Hamed, K.A. Shail, Khalid B. Mardouf, H.A. Otaibi,
A.M. Hassan, A.M. Farooque, S. Al-Sulami, A.Al-Hamza,
in the above set of equations while calculating the Nanofiltration (NF) membrane pretreatment of SWRO feed
fouling factor. & MSF make up, SWCC, 2005.
[6] O.A. Hamed, H.A. Al-Otaibi, Prospects of operation of MSF
desalination plants at high TBT and low anti-scalant dosing
• Density of Mg(OH)2 is 2,344 kg/m3. rate, Desalination 256 (2010) 181–189.
• Density of CaCO3 is 2,710 kg/m3. [7] M.A.K. Al-Sofi, F.E. Essam, M. Imam, G.M. Mustafa, Heat
• Thermal conductivity of Mg(OH)2 is 8 W m1 K1. transfer measurement as a criterion for performance evaluation
of scale inhibition in MSF plants, IDA Abu Dhabi, 1995.
• Thermal conductivity of CaCO3 is 2.2 W m1 K1. [8] G.F. Tusel, R. Rautenbach, J. Widua, Sea water desalination
plant “Sirte”––An example for an advanced MSF design, Desa-
The fouling factor value based on the above equa- lination 96(1–3) (1994) 379–396.
[9] A.A. Mabrouk, I. Ahmad, A. Mahmoud, A.S. Nafey, J.K. Park,
tions is presented in Fig. 11 corresponding to 50 g/l Techno-economic analysis of high capacity once through MSF
salinity without ball cleaning. desalination plants, IDA Australia, 2011.