Module No. 3 Measurement Based On Accounting Policies
Module No. 3 Measurement Based On Accounting Policies
Sandesh DSouza, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, St Philomena’s College(Autonomous) Mysore pg. 1
Module No. 2 Measurement Based on Accounting Policies
The effect of a change in an accounting estimate should be recognized prospectively by including
it in profit or loss in the period of the change, if the change affects that period only, or the period
of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.
Errors:
Errors can arise in respect of the recognition, measurement, presentation or disclosure of elements
of financial statements.
Material prior period errors should be corrected retrospectively in the first set of financial
statements approved for issue after their discovery.
Retrospective restatement involves correcting the recognition, measurement and disclosure of
amounts of elements of financial statements as if the error had not occurred in the prior periods.
For example, if an error is discovered in the calculation of depreciation expense for the prior year,
the opening balance of retained earnings for the earliest prior period presented would be restated
to correct the cumulative effect of the error before the beginning of that period.
The application of these principles ensures that the financial statements provide relevant and reliable
information about the entity's financial position, performance and changes in financial position.
Consistent application of accounting policies, appropriate changes when necessary, and correction of
material prior period errors are essential for achieving this objective.
Sandesh DSouza, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, St Philomena’s College(Autonomous) Mysore pg. 2
Module No. 2 Measurement Based on Accounting Policies
o Cumulative translation differences
o Compound financial instruments
o Designation of previously recognized financial instruments
Presentation and Disclosure:
An entity's first Ind AS financial statements shall include at least three balance sheets, two
statements of profit and loss, two statements of cash flows, and two statements of changes in
equity, along with related notes.
Specific disclosures are required in the first Ind AS financial statements to explain the transition
from previous GAAP to Ind AS.
Effective Date and Transition:
Ind AS 101 is applicable when an entity first adopts Ind AS by an explicit and unreserved
statement of compliance with Ind AS.
The transition provisions are applied prospectively from the date of transition to Ind AS.
These notes cover the key aspects of Ind AS 101, including the preparation of the opening Ind AS balance
sheet, application of accounting policies, measurement principles, mandatory exceptions, optional
exemptions, presentation and disclosure requirements, and the effective date and transition provisions.
Scope
IAS 20 applies to all government grants and other forms of government assistance. However, it does not
cover government assistance that is provided in the form of benefits in determining taxable income. It does
not cover government grants covered by IAS 41 Agriculture, either. The benefit of a government loan at a
below-market rate of interest is treated as a government grant.
The grant is recognised as income over the period necessary to match them with the related costs,
for which they are intended to compensate, on a systematic basis.
Non-monetary grants, such as land or other resources, are usually accounted for at fair value,
although recording both the asset and the grant at a nominal amount is also permitted.
Even if there are no conditions attached to the assistance specifically relating to the operating
activities of the entity (other than the requirement to operate in certain regions or industry sectors),
such grants should not be credited to equity.
A grant receivable as compensation for costs already incurred or for immediate financial support,
with no future related costs, should be recognised as income in the period in which it is receivable.
as deferred income, or by deducting the grant from the asset's carrying amount.
A grant relating to income may be reported separately as 'other income' or deducted from
the related expense.
If a grant becomes repayable, it should be treated as a change in estimate. Where the original grant related
to income, the repayment should be applied first against any related unamortised deferred credit, and any
Sandesh DSouza, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, St Philomena’s College(Autonomous) Mysore pg. 3
Module No. 2 Measurement Based on Accounting Policies
excess should be dealt with as an expense. Where the original grant related to an asset, the repayment should
be treated as increasing the carrying amount of the asset or reducing the deferred income balance. The
cumulative depreciation which would have been charged had the grant not been received should be charged
as an expense.
1. The goods or services received are measured at their fair value, unless the fair value cannot be
estimated reliably. In that case, they are measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments
granted.
2. For transactions with employees, the fair value is measured at the grant date.
3. For transactions with non-employees, the fair value is measured at the date when the goods or
services are received.
4. The fair value of equity instruments granted (e.g., share options) is determined using an
appropriate option pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes or binomial model.
5. Vesting conditions (service and non-market performance conditions) are taken into account when
estimating the number of equity instruments that will eventually vest.
6. Market conditions (e.g., target share price) are reflected in the fair value measurement at the grant
date.
7. Non-vesting conditions (e.g., transfer restrictions) are taken into account when estimating the fair
value of equity instruments granted.
1. The goods or services received are measured at the fair value of the liability incurred.
2. The liability is remeasured at each reporting date until it is settled, with changes in fair value
recognized in profit or loss.
3. The fair value of the liability is determined using an appropriate option pricing model or other
suitable valuation techniques.
1. For transactions where the entity or the counterparty can choose whether to settle in cash or equity
instruments, the transaction is accounted for as a cash-settled share-based payment, unless certain
conditions are met for equity settlement.
2. If the entity has a present obligation to settle in cash, the transaction is accounted for as a cash-
settled share-based payment.
1. If the terms and conditions of a share-based payment arrangement are modified, the entity
recognizes the incremental fair value granted as an expense over the remaining vesting period.
2. If a share-based payment is canceled, any remaining unrecognized compensation cost is
recognized immediately.
Sandesh DSouza, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, St Philomena’s College(Autonomous) Mysore pg. 4
Module No. 2 Measurement Based on Accounting Policies
Disclosure Requirements
Ind AS 102 requires extensive disclosures related to the nature and extent of share-based payment
arrangements, the measurement basis used, and the effect on profit or loss and the financial position of the
entity.
These notes provide an overview of the key measurement principles for share-based payments under Ind
AS 102. The standard should be referred to for detailed guidance and specific requirements.
Sandesh DSouza, Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, St Philomena’s College(Autonomous) Mysore pg. 5