MODULE 1-Introduction in Economics
MODULE 1-Introduction in Economics
Thinking
Scarcity implies that there are never enough resources to meet everyone's needs.
Economics is the study of the decisions and trade-offs we make when faced with
scarcity
Opportunity cost is what we sacrifice when we select one item above another.
https://youtu.be/g9uUIUqhrSQ See this video for a quick introduction to economics. They are
excellent resources for reviewing and strengthening your comprehension of the topics covered, and
they come highly recommended. Seeking the videos is beneficial even if you consider the reading to
contain sufficient information.
Basic Microeconomics for Marketing Management/Human Resource Management/Entrepreneurship
by: Exequiel Mendoza Perez, MBA
Comprehending Scarcity and Economics
Learning Objectives
Scarcity
There are finite amounts of the resources we value, including labor, time,
labor, capital, land, and entrepreneurs. Simply put, there are never enough resources
to satisfy all of our wants and requirements. We call this state "scarcity."
Economics
We have to make decisions when our resources are limited. Once more, the
study of economics examines how people make decisions in situations of scarcity.
Families, businesses, societies, and individuals can all make these decisions.
Let's think about a few choices we make with constrained resources. Consider
the following:
Are you the fortunate student who has every class you've ever wanted to take
with the professor of your choice at the ideal time and place? It's likely that you have
had to compromise on things because they were scarce. Classes meet for a set amount
of time each day, and there are only so many faculty members available to teach
them. It is not possible to assign every faculty member to every time slot. Each
classroom can only have one class assigned to it at a time. This implies that each
student must choose between the teacher, the class location, and the time slot.
Take a moment to consider where you would live if you were wealthy beyond
measure. Most likely, that's not where you currently reside. Most likely, scarcity
played a factor in your decision to move. Which place did you choose? In a pinch,
you might have opted to live near your place of employment or education. However,
some places are more expensive than others due to the demand for housing, so you
might have opted to pay more for a convenient location or less for one that requires
you to spend more time traveling. You are compelled to select from the housing that
is available at all times because there is a finite amount of housing in each location.
One's ability to pay must always be taken into consideration when making housing
decisions. When choosing a place to call home, people must contend with constraints
on their ability to pay for housing, time, and other resources. These constraints are
frequently brought about by developers, landlords, city planners, and government
laws.
Think about the following important points while you watch the video:
Economics is the study of how people make decisions when resources are scarce.
Scarcity exists when the demand for goods and services by people outpaces the
supply. People consider costs and benefits when making decisions out of self-interest.
All societies, regardless of size, have to make decisions regarding the use of
their resources. Families have to choose between saving up for a luxurious vacation or
a new car. Towns have to decide whether to allocate more funds for the school system
or for law enforcement and fire safety. Governments must choose between increasing
funding for environmental preservation and national defense. Most of the time, the
budget simply doesn't have enough money to cover everything.
Since resources can never fully satisfy all needs and desires, economics helps
us understand the decisions made by individuals, families, businesses, and societies.
Economic goods, or scarce goods, make up the majority of goods and services.
Products considered scarce are those for which, in a perfect world, there would be a
larger demand than supply. Economic goods are selling for more money on the
market as a result of the shortage. That is, they are not free for consumers to obtain.
What is a good example that isn't in short supply? Is there water in the sea? In
a desert, sand? Since consumers can get as much as they want for free, any good
whose supply exceeds demand if its price were zero is referred to as a free good. Air
was once thought of as a free good, but clean air is becoming more and more scarce.
Productive Resources
Now that we have established the finite nature of resources, let us examine the
definition of resources in more detail. There are four factors of production, or
productive resources (resources must be able to produce something:
Land: any natural resource, including the land itself as well as vegetation, animals,
wind, sun, water, and other elements.
Economic capital: anything produced with the intention of using it to produce
other goods and services. Keep in mind the differences between economic capital,
which is productive, and financial capital, which is not. Although money itself isn't
productive, the equipment and tools it can be used to purchase can be.
In the video that follows, factors of production and productive resources are clarified
once more.: https://youtu.be/0PgP0dXAGAE
The link between money, goods, and services is explained by the economy's circular
flow. It is frequently depicted using a circular flow model, similar to the one in Figure
1-1.
The two main economic actors shown in the diagram are households and
businesses. The product market and the factor/resource market are the two
marketplaces in which these two players compete with one another. In the product
market, households buy the products and services that companies are willing to sell.
The roles are reversed in the resource market, where households sell their resources—
land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship—to businesses. Interdependence is a
recurrent theme in economics, and the model amply illustrates it.
Opportunity Cost
Every decision you make regarding how to use your limited resources also
represents a decision to forgo other options. The concept of opportunity cost is used
by economists to describe what must be forgone in order to achieve a desired goal.
Every decision has an opportunity cost, which is a basic tenet of economics. The
learning you miss out on is the opportunity cost of sleeping through your economics
Basic Microeconomics for Marketing Management/Human Resource Management/Entrepreneurship
by: Exequiel Mendoza Perez, MBA
class—which is not advised. You are not allowed to spend your money on movies if it
is spent on video games. The decision to marry someone means that you forfeit the
chance to marry other people. Put simply, we are surrounded by opportunity cost.
The concept of opportunity cost states that the price of one good is equal to the
opportunity cost of not doing or consuming something else; to put it another way,
opportunity cost is the cost of the best possible substitute.
To learn more about opportunity cost and to see additional examples, watch this video.
https://youtu.be/PSU-_n81QT0
Learning Objectives
The fact that economics is a broad field should be evident by now. There are
two subfields within economics: macroeconomics examines the economy as a whole,
while microeconomics concentrates on the activities of individual agents within the
economy, such as households, businesses, and workers. Its main concerns are wide-
ranging and include trade balance, inflation, unemployment, and growth.
Macroeconomics and microeconomics are complementary viewpoints on the topic of
the economy as a whole rather than two distinct fields of study.
Studying a biological ecosystem, such as a lake, presents an example of why
both macroeconomic and microeconomic viewpoints are important. A person
studying the lake might concentrate on particular subjects, such as the trees that
encircle it, specific types of algae or plant life, or the traits of specific fish or snails.
An alternative perspective would be to look at the lake's ecosystem as a whole, from
top to bottom, taking into account what exists in the ecosystem, how it stays in
balance, and how external factors affect it. Despite having different points of view,
both methodologies are helpful and both researchers study the same lake. Similar in
that they both examine the same economy, but from distinct vantage points and with
distinct priorities, are macroeconomics and microeconomics.
In economics, the state of the macroeconomy affects the micro decisions made
by specific businesses. For instance, businesses are more likely to hire workers if the
economy as a whole is expanding. Ultimately, the microeconomic choices made by
specific households and businesses determine how well the macroeconomy performs.
What influences how individuals and households spend their money? Considering
their spending limit, which combination of products and services will best suit their
requirements and preferences? How do people choose between working full- or part-
time, and whether to work at all? How do individuals determine how much to borrow
in order to spend more than they currently have or how much to save for the future?
What decides what goods a company will make and sell, and in what quantities? What
establishes the prices that a business will charge? What dictates a company's method
of product production? What decides how many employees it will recruit? How is a
company going to fund its operations? When will a business choose to grow, reduce,
or even shut down? The theories of the firm and consumer behavior will be covered in
this text's microeconomic section.
Macroeconomics
Monetary policy, which is carried out by a country's central bank and includes
policies that impact bank lending, interest rates, and financial capital markets. This is
the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) in the Philippines.
The following video provides an explanation of the distinctions between macroeconomics and
microeconomics, along with their respective focal points: https://youtu.be/w8tUIq7Blsg
The production possibilities frontier (or PPF, for short) is a comprehensive model
of the economy that displays every possible combination of goods, services, and
products that a society could produce, given the resources at its disposal.
Learning Objectives
You'll notice similarities between societal and individual choice as you read this
section. For the time being, concentrate on the similarities as there are more of them
than differences.
Individuals must manage their finances and schedules, while societies must
contend with the scarcity of resources (labor, land, capital, raw materials, etc.). There
is a limit to the amount of goods and services society can produce because its
resources are limited at any given time. Stated differently, the limited resources lead
to a limited number of products.
Suppose a society desires two products: health care and education. This situation
is illustrated by the production possibilities frontier in Figure 1.
The vertical, or y, axis represents health care, and the horizontal, or x, axis
represents education. What is the origin of the PPF? It results from the methods used
in the production of the two goods as well as the restricted resources that can be used
in that process. Let's say that a single teacher is able to instruct 25 students in a
classroom. Education can be given to a maximum of 250 students if society has 10
teachers in total. We would say that utilizing the current educational procedures, one
teacher could "produce" education for 25 students.
The production possibilities frontier, above all, makes the trade-off between
healthcare and education crystal evident. Assume society has decided to function at
point B and is thinking about creating more educational opportunities. The PPF slopes
downward from left to right, making it impossible for society to afford more
education without sacrificing some health care. That is the price this society must pay.
Let's say it thinks about going from point B to point C. What would the additional
education's opportunity cost be? The healthcare that society would have to forgo
would be the opportunity cost.
Remember that the terms "monetary" and "fiscal," which refer to government
revenue or taxes, will help you distinguish between these policies.
Watch this video about the hypothetical "Econ Isle" to have another look at the production possibilities
frontier. https://youtu.be/nsQi2ipSP2c?t=9
See another explanation for the PPF's curvature by watching this video.
https://youtu.be/Nw0ugthoc8o?t=7
We can now discuss the distinctions between a person's budget constraint and
society's PPF.
The various combinations of goods and services that a customer can buy with their set
budget are displayed in a budget constraint. A production possibilities frontier depicts
the range of products and services that a community can generate given its restricted
resources. The production possibilities frontier (PPF) differs from a budget constraint
in that it considers societal choice, which means that its axes will have much larger
numbers than those of a budget constraint on an individual basis.
The primary distinction between the two graphs is that a production possibilities curve
is normally concave towards the origin, whereas a budget constraint is represented by
a straight line. The explanation for this discrepancy is rather straightforward: the ratio
Basic Microeconomics for Marketing Management/Human Resource Management/Entrepreneurship
by: Exequiel Mendoza Perez, MBA
of the prices of the two goods or services determines a budget line's slope. Prices are
fixed, regardless of the quantity of each good or service that a customer purchases.
The cost to society of producing one good or service in comparison to another is
represented by the slope of a PPF, on the other hand. The relative costs shift when
society reallocates resources from one product to another, which also affects the PPF's
slope. Let’s dig into this.
Start by examining point A, which is located at the upper left corner of the PPF, to
comprehend why it is curved. Assume we have two different types of resources:
teachers and doctors, as in Figure 1 (repeated below). At point A, every resource—
that is, every teacher and every doctor—is committed to providing healthcare; nothing
is left over for education. Let's say that the teachers are doing their best to assist the
doctors while they practice medicine. This would be absurd, even out of control.
Children, for instance, do not attend school; instead, they see a doctor every day,
whether or not they are ill. Every part of the body is being cosmetically operated on,
but there is no such thing as a college or high school education!
Now consider a scenario in which some of these funds are transferred from healthcare
to education, resulting in the economy reaching point B rather than point A. Which
kinds of resources will be used to produce education? The doctors would be better off
practicing medicine instead of teaching, since they are not very good at either.
However, the teachers excel in teaching but struggle in providing healthcare. That
isn't what they were trained for, after all. Thus, shifting teachers from healthcare to
education makes sense. Furthermore, because the teachers weren't very good at
providing healthcare, the society doesn't lose much when they move. But since that is
what teachers are trained to do, there is a lot of education gained. This indicates that
there will be a minimal drop in healthcare from point A to point B, but a significant
increase in education. In terms of graphics, the slope—that is, the ratio of rise to run
—is flat because the rise is small and the run is large. Put differently, there is little
opportunity cost associated with education in terms of healthcare.
Graph illustrating how a society's resources are limited and frequently require
prioritizing where to invest. Healthcare is plotted on the y-axis and education is
plotted on the x-axis of this graph.
Starting from point F on the other end of the PPF and moving to point D would mean
that doctors would be transitioning from teaching to healthcare, which would result in
a large gain in healthcare and a small loss in education (using the same reasoning as
before). In summary, there would be a significant opportunity cost to education in
terms of healthcare, and the PPF would have a steep slope from point F to point D.
In general, the cost of production rises in proportion to the cost of producing other
goods or services as society produces more and more of a given good or service. As a
result, a PPF's slope begins flat and gets progressively steeper. The general rule still
applies even though there are more resources and goods available to us than just labor
in the real world.
There is an alternative way of looking at this. Budget dollars are the only scarce
resource available to consumers. We are merely spending money on different things
when we select more of one good and less of another, but every dollar is the same
when it comes to buying any good. There are numerous scarce resources for society.
Teachers and doctors are the two distinct resources in our straightforward example
above, and each is more adept at one task than the other. Stated differently, the value
of each resource varies when it comes to producing distinct goods. Generally
speaking, the trade-off (e.g., budget line) will be constant when allocating a single
scarce resource; however, the trade-off (e.g., PPF) will increase when allocating
multiple scarce resources.
The law of diminishing returns is probably familiar to you if you've ever stayed up
late studying: eventually, every hour you spend studying makes you less successful.
The lesson is not that society will inevitably make a drastic decision, such as stopping
all funding for health at point F or education at point A. Rather, the takeaway is that
the benefits of allocating more marginal resources to education rely on the amount
that is currently being allocated. On the one hand, if there are currently very few
resources allocated to education, then increasing those resources can result in
comparatively significant gains. However, adding more resources will only result in
comparatively smaller gains if a significant amount of resources are already allocated
to education.
The law of diminishing returns is the term used to describe this pattern because it
occurs so frequently. According to this law, the marginal benefit of allocating more
resources to a particular goal will decrease as those resources are allocated. For
instance, after spending almost nothing on crime reduction, a government may see
comparatively significant gains in crime reduction after increasing spending by a
specific amount. However, subsequent increases usually result in comparatively
smaller reductions in crime, and it would be extremely costly to provide enough
police and security to bring down crime to zero.
Basic Microeconomics for Marketing Management/Human Resource Management/Entrepreneurship
by: Exequiel Mendoza Perez, MBA
The production possibilities frontier curve demonstrates that while more resources are
allocated to education, the first gains are fairly significant but eventually decline as
they move from left to right along the horizontal axis. Similarly, the initial gains are
fairly large but again gradually diminish as more resources are added to the health
care system, moving from bottom to top on the vertical axis. The production
possibilities frontier bends outward as a result of the law of diminishing returns.
3) For whom to produce. Will the goods and services to be produced for the
children or adults, for girls or boys, for the rich or for the poor? This is the
problem of distribution. It is the determination of how output is to be
divided or allocated among members of the society.
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
ECONOMIC GOALS
Economic policies are developed for certain goals which the economy would
like to achieve. The following are the goals or objectives of any society which may
minimize economic and social problems.
4) FULL EMPLOYEMT. To provide suitable jobs for all citizens who are
willing and able to work. Full employment is not only confined to
employment of labor but also full utilization of land, capital and entrepreneur
that will propel to more production in the economy, hence, economic growth.
Learning Objectives
There are two different but related tasks that economists perform. They study
economic problems, for example, in order to establish causation and effect. For
instance, what caused the unemployment rate to spike sharply in 2008 and 2009?
Additionally, economists recommend policies. For instance, what action should the
federal government take in light of the rising unemployment rate?
The first kind of work is economic science, where scientists try to understand how the
world (or at least the economy) functions using theories and data. The conclusions are
known as positive statements, and this process is known as positive reasoning. Given
that GDP, or economic production, determines employment levels, it would be
reasonable to conclude that the slowdown in GDP during that time period contributed
to the rise in unemployment. The Great Recession has been the name given to this
downturn.
The second kind of activity is more arbitrary and invariably rests on the values of the
researcher. The process is known as normative reasoning, and the results are known
as normative statements. One suggestion for policy would be to encourage demand in
the economy by the government, as unemployed workers are not receiving any
income, and this would enable them to find new employment. A different
recommendation for policy would be that the government shouldn't try to stimulate
demand because doing so could result in a larger federal budget deficit that would
have to be made up for by higher taxes in the future. Which of these suggestions is the
best one to follow? Depending on your personal standards, yes.
Positive Statements
In general, positive reasoning and positive statements are impartial. They are
therefore testable. These can be divided into two groups. One is a hypothesis, such as
"a decline in GDP causes unemployment," which can be empirically verified by
examining the GDP and unemployment data. Similar to hypotheses, a statement of
fact can be proven to be true or false. Examples of such statements are "It's raining"
and "Microsoft is the largest producer of computer operating systems in the world." A
positive statement is a factual assertion or a hypothesis. Also keep in mind that while
affirmative claims are testable, they remain true even if they are untrue.
Even though disagreements over affirmative statements are common, they can
eventually be settled by research. But there is another class of claims for which
research can never reconcile discrepancies. Any statement that assigns a value is
normative. Nobody can "prove" that a statement is true or false; it is the speaker's
opinion in this case. These are a few instances of normative claims in the field of
economics:
These claims are unprovable because they are predicated on the values of the person
making them.
Make an introduction to your classmates first. From where are you? What activities
do you enjoy? Why are you taking this class, and what are your academic objectives?
In terms of economics, what are you most eager to learn about?
Economics: Is it a science? Why not, and why not also? Provide the definitions of
"science" and "economics" as you understand them in your response and explanation.
Module 1- Activity 2
You will show that you can create a basic production possibilities curve in this
assignment by providing information on the quantity of one input (labor) and the
labor needed to produce each of the two outputs (butter and guns). Additionally, you
ought to be able to determine the opportunity cost of one good in relation to another
using the PPC's slope. You will provide an explanation of your figure analysis to
support your claim that combinations of the two goods cannot be produced outside of
the PPC.
Assume a country has twelve labor units in total, which can be used to make
butter or firearms. Producing one butter requires two labor units, whereas
producing one gun requires six labor units.
Justify the existence of scarcity in this economy. Make use of the data to support your
arguments.