IWB Chapter 7 - Standard Costing and Variance Analysis
IWB Chapter 7 - Standard Costing and Variance Analysis
Outcome
explain why planned standard costs, prices and volumes are useful
calculate variances for materials, labour, variable overheads, sales prices and
sales volumes
prepare a statement that reconciles budgeted profit with actual profit calculated
using marginal costing
explain why variances could have arisen and the inter-relationships between
variances
The underpinning detail for this chapter in your Integrated Workbook can
be found in Chapter 7 of your Study Text
185
Chapter 7
Overview
Standard Types of
cost standards
STANDARD COSTING
Criticisms AND VARIANCE Interpretation
ANALYSIS
Variable
Sales Variances costs
Reconciliation
186
Standard costing and variance analysis
Standard costing
The actual costs incurred are measured after the event and compared
to the pre-determined standards.
187
Chapter 7
Once standard costs for a product or service have been set, they are presented in a
standard cost card. A standard cost card for a product, showing the variable
elements of production cost per unit, might look like this:
Direct material: standard quantity (10 kg) × standard price ($5 per kg)
Direct labour standard hours (12 hours) × standard rate ($11 per hour)
Variable production standard hours (12 hours) × standard rate ($9 per hour)
overheads
Note: The standard hours for labour and overheads are usually the same as we
normally assume that variable overheads are absorbed on the basis of labour hours.
These standard data provide the information for a detailed variance analysis, as long
as the actual data are collected at the same level of detail.
188
Standard costing and variance analysis
Ideal standard
Attainable standard
Current standard
Basic standard
– set for the long term and remain unchanged over a period of years
– often retained as a minimum standard and can be used for long term
comparisons of performance.
189
Chapter 7
There has recently been some criticism of the appropriateness of standard costing in
the modern business environment:
190
Standard costing and variance analysis
Variances
Example 1
XYZ manufactures a single product. The standard cost card for one unit of the
product is given:
$
Direct material: 10 kg × $7 per kg 70
Direct labour: 40 hours × $10 per hour 400
Variable overhead: 40 hours × $3 per hour 120
——–
590
——–
For January, the company had budgeted to produce and sell 2,000 units, but
2,100 units were actually produced and sold and the actual costs incurred
were as follows:
Direct material: 22,500 kg purchased and used at a cost of $146,250
Direct labour: 83,000 hours worked at a cost of $845,000
Variable overhead: $248,200
191
Chapter 7
Direct material
price variance
Direct material total
variance
Direct material
usage variance
The direct material price variance reveals how much of the direct material total
variance was caused by paying a different price for the materials purchased.
$
22,500 kg purchased should have cost (× $7) 157,500
But did cost 146,250
———–
Direct material price variance $11,250 favourable
———–
Direct material usage variance
The direct material usage variance reveals how much of the direct material total
variance was caused by using a different quantity of material, compared with the
standard allowance for the production achieved.
kg
2,100 units produced should have used (× 10 kg) 21,000
But did use 22,500
——–—
Variance in kg 1,500 adverse
—–——
× standard price per kg ($7):
Direct material usage variance $10,500 adverse
——–—
Direct material total variance = $11,250 favourable + $10,500 adverse = $750
favourable
192
Standard costing and variance analysis
Example 2
BGT budgeted to produce 3,000 units with the following standard cost for
materials:
$
Direct material: 5 litres × $0.60 per litre 3
During the year it produced 4,000 units and spent $11,440 on 20,800 litres of
material.
193
Chapter 7
The direct labour efficiency variance reveals how much of the direct labour total
variance was caused by using a different number of hours of labour, compared with
the standard allowance for the production achieved.
hours
2,100 units produced should have used (× 40 hours) 84,000
But did use 83,000
——–—
Variance in hours 1,000 favourable
——–—
× standard rate per hour ($10):
Direct labour efficiency variance $10,000 favourable
——–—
Direct labour total variance = $15,000 adverse + $10,000 favourable = $5,000
adverse
194
Standard costing and variance analysis
Example 3
BGT budgeted to produce 3,000 units with the following standard cost for
materials:
$
Direct labour 0.75 hours × $40 per hour 30
During the year it produced 4,000 units and spent $168,000 on 4,000 hours of
labour.
195
Chapter 7
Variable overhead
expenditure variance
Variable overhead
total variance
Variable overhead
efficiency variance
The variable overhead expenditure variance reveals how much of the variable
overhead total variance was caused by paying a different hourly rate of overhead for
the hours worked.
$
83,000 hours should have cost (× $3) 249,000
But did cost 248,200
———–
Variable overhead expenditure variance $800 favourable
———–
Variable overhead efficiency variance
The variable overhead efficiency variance reveals how much of the variable
overhead total variance was caused by using a different number of hours of labour,
compared with the standard allowance for the production achieved. Its calculation is
very similar to the calculation of the labour efficiency variance.
Variance in hours (from labour efficiency) 1,000 favourable
———
× standard rate per hour ($3):
Variable overhead efficiency variance $3,000 favourable
———
Variable overhead total variance = $800 favourable + $3,000 favourable = $3,800
favourable.
196
Standard costing and variance analysis
Example 4
BGT budgeted to produce 3,000 units with the following standard cost for
materials:
$
Variable overhead 0.75 hours × $8 per hour 6
During the year it produced 4,000 units and spent $31,200 on 4,000 hours of
variable overhead.
Calculate the variable overhead expenditure and efficiency variances.
197
Chapter 7
Sales
price variance
Sales
total variance
Sales volume
contribution variance
The sales price variance reveals the difference in total revenue caused by charging a
different selling price from standard.
$
But did sell for 1,350,000
2,100 units should sell for (× $650) 1,365,000
——––—–
Sales price variance $15,000 adverse
——––—–
198
Standard costing and variance analysis
The sales volume contribution variance reveals the contribution difference which is
caused by selling a different quantity from that budgeted.
Actual sales volume 2,100
Budgeted sales volume 2,000
———
Variance in units 100 favourable
———
× standard rate contribution (650 – 590) 60
Sales volume contribution variance $6,000 favourable
———
Total sales variance = $15,000 adverse + $6,000 favourable = $9,000 adverse.
In all of the cost variance calculations we saw that the budgeted volume
was irrelevant. However, the budgeted sales volume is used in the
sales volume variance.
199
Chapter 7
Example 5
BGT budgeted to produce and sell 3,000 units at a selling price of $60 and
make a contribution of $21 per unit.
During the year it sold 4,000 units at a selling price of $55, with a contribution
of $18 per unit.
200
Standard costing and variance analysis
Analysing variances
Continuing with our XYZ example, we can produce the following operating statement.
$ $ $
Budgeted contribution (2,000 × $60) 120,000
Sales volume contribution variance 6,000 F
————
Standard contribution from actual sales
volume 126,000
Sales price variance 15,000 A
————
111,000
Cost variances: Fav Adv
Direct material price 11,250
Direct material usage 10,500
Direct labour rate 15,000
Direct labour efficiency 10,000
Variable overhead expenditure 800
Variable overhead efficiency 3,000
———— ————
Total cost variances 25,050 25,500 450 A
————
Actual contribution 110,550
–––––––
201
Chapter 7
202
Standard costing and variance analysis
Example 6
An organisation had budgeted for contribution in October of $340,000 but
experienced an adverse labour rate variance of $20,000. The only other
variance was in fixed overheads, which showed a favourable expenditure
variance of $2,000 when compared to the budgeted fixed overhead cost of
$148,000.
A $174,000
B $176,000
C $318,000
D $322,000
203
Chapter 7
Theft
204
Standard costing and variance analysis
205
Chapter 7
206
Standard costing and variance analysis
Answers
Example 1
XYZ manufactures a single product. The standard cost card for one unit of the
product is given:
$
Direct material: 10 kg × $7 per kg 70
Direct labour: 40 hours × $10 per hour 400
Variable overhead: 40 hours × $3 per hour 120
——–
590
——–
For January, the company had budgeted to produce and sell 2,000 units, but
2,100 units were actually produced and sold and the actual costs incurred
were as follows:
Direct material: 22,500 kg purchased and used at a cost of $146,250
Direct labour: 83,000 hours worked at a cost of $845,000
Variable overhead: $248,200
207
Chapter 7
Example 2
Solution
$
20,800 litres purchased should have cost (× $0.6) 12,480
But did cost 11,440
———–
Direct material price variance $1,040 favourable
———–
litres
4,000 units produced should have used (× 5 ltrs) 20,000
But did use 20,800
——–—
Variance in litres 800 adverse
—–——
× standard price per litre ($0.60):
Direct material usage variance $480 adverse
——–—
Calculating variances is a way of demonstrating your technical knowledge on
systems and processes. Variances allow you to evaluate an organisation’s
systems and process and can lead to you making recommendations for
improvement. This in turn will lead to positive behaviours in adding value to
the organisation as you help the organisation in rectifying problems identified
by the variance. Even when variances are favourable and not necessarily
indicative of a problem, you can create positive behaviours for examining
whether the cause of the variance can be replicated and the organisation can
seek continuous improvement in this way. These knowledge, skills and
behaviours apply to all of the variance examples that follow.
208
Standard costing and variance analysis
Example 3
Solution
$
4,000 hours of labour should have cost (× $40) 160,000
But did cost 168,000
———–
Direct labour rate variance $8,000 adverse
———–
hours
4,000 units produced should have used (× 0.75 hrs) 3,000
But did use 4,000
——–—
Variance in hours 1,000 adverse
—–——
× standard price per hour ($40):
Direct labour efficiency variance $40,000 adverse
——–—
209
Chapter 7
Example 4
Solution
$
4,000 hours of overhead should have cost (× $8) 32,000
But did cost 31,200
———–
Variable overhead expenditure variance $800 favourable
———–
hours
4,000 units produced should have used (× 0.75 hrs) 3,000
But did use 4,000
——–—
Variance in hours 1,000 adverse
—–——
× standard price per hour ($8):
Variable overhead efficiency variance $8,000 adverse
210
Standard costing and variance analysis
Example 5
Solution
$
4,000 units actually sold for (× $55) 220,000
4,000 units should sell for (× $60) 240,000
——––—–
Sales price variance $20,000 adverse
——––—–
Actual sales volume 4,000
Budgeted sales volume 3,000
———
Variance in units 1,000 favourable
———
× standard rate contribution $21
Sales volume contribution variance $21,000 favourable
——–—
211
Chapter 7
Example 6
Solution
A
$
Budgeted contribution 340,000
Labour rate variance 20,000 adverse
——––—–
Actual contribution 320,000
Actual fixed overheads
($148,000 – $2,000 favourable variance) (146,000)
——––—–
Actual profit $174,000
——––—–
212