Lim 2013 Video Blogging and Youth Activism in Malaysia
Lim 2013 Video Blogging and Youth Activism in Malaysia
the International
Communication Gazette
Video blogging and 75(3) 300–321
ª The Author(s) 2013
youth activism in Reprints and permission:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
Joanne B Y Lim
University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Malaysia
Abstract
The Internet has engendered a ‘democratizing’ effect, especially in highly censored soci-
eties. Young activists are increasingly using online sites, such as YouTube, EngageMedia and
MySpace as alternative platforms to raise issues that are of importance to the community,
but which are taboo in society (e.g., homosexuality, Orang Asli land rights, and ethnic
discrimination, among others). The findings from interviews and focus groups conducted
with 80 young adults, and a compilation of video blogging platforms/activities popular
amongst Malaysians, clearly demonstrate the significant use of videos in advocating human
rights, and social and political justice, as well as in challenging existing regulatory and
legislative regimes. This article examines how video-sharing websites are fast becoming
popular, albeit contested, spaces for critical documentary and experimental works to
inform, educate, and encourage discourse among young adults. It then considers the
extent to which such ‘viral videos’ embody and/or confront local/national struggles
towards social and political change.
Keywords
Activism, engagement, ICTs, Malaysia, participation, prosumer, social media, video
blogging, youth
There’s no looking back . . . even if I stop doing actual political work, the films I make will
still be meaningful . . . films that will challenge the audience to think more critically about
life . . . be it about gender or media. (M.L., full-time activist, feminist and filmmaker/video
blogger)
Corresponding author:
Joanne B Y Lim, School of Modern Languages and Cultures, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Jalan
Broga, 43500 Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Email: [email protected]
Lim 301
In this age of digitization, the term ‘mainstream media’ has been redefined – various
modes of social and cultural engagement are now used to question, parody, and debate
the decisions and prerogatives of various institutions of power. Regarded as a new and
possibly more effective form of mediation, video blogging is a tool that enables young
Malaysians to reach out to their peers, forge links, garner support, encourage discourse
and, increasingly, even to mobilize, as suggested by the avid video blogger in the quote
above. More importantly, that which is regarded as alternative, activist, oppositional, and
radical media (see Lievrouw, 2011) has now become the dominant culture or the new
‘mainstream’.
We are increasingly challenged to rethink our ‘ways of doing culture’ and what
exactly constitutes the ‘politics of culture’. For decades, we have participated in the dis-
course on cultural politics, claiming that various cultural forms are expressions of power
(Street, 1997; Willis, 1978) and asserting that power in its own right (Frith, 1998; Gilroy,
1993; Jenkins, 1992). Clearly, culture is political, but it is in thinking of politics as
becoming ‘culture’ that we begin to make sense of, first, how new media are increasingly
used to address political issues, and second (more importantly), how being ‘involved’, or
participating in political issues, is fast becoming a popular culture among young people.
These conditions do not necessarily reflect the extent to which youth is more actively
involved in practical politics; such assumptions have led to state interventions that result
in desperate measures to impede student involvement in politics (in reference to the
highly controversial University and University Colleges Act 1971).1 Rather, the more
pertinent reading of the rise of activism and political engagement among the youth may
in fact be that the notion of change carries more motivation than the actual reason for
change. While youth leaders may deliberately utilize video-sharing platforms on social
media to achieve their causes, the hundreds, sometimes thousands, of followers, fans,
members, and ‘likers’ participate or join a ‘group’ for various reasons, and with varying
levels of involvement. Are young Malaysians less concerned about issues and more
attracted to the idea of participation, and where do differences lie between actual and
virtual participation?2 This prompted an important inquiry into the level of engagement,
above the quantity (number of groups) and method (ICT/social media platform used) of
activities. Is politics fast becoming popular culture, equating itself with trash culture (see
Highmore, 2001: 60–74)? What forms of dialectics/juxtapositions exist between politics
and pop culture?
There appear to be two important sources of influence on today’s alternative and acti-
vist uses of new media, especially among young adults in Malaysia; one cultural, the
other political. The cultural influence relates to the popularity of activist/indie/under-
ground film-making, which combines radical politics with provocative new uses of
media, performance, and language. The political influence is the study of social move-
ments as mechanisms or agents of social change, particularly the identity-centered new
social movements perspective. A combination of these two influences gives rise to the
increasingly popular production and sharing of independent films/video via the method
of video blogging: the use of videos to express ideas, articulate interests and needs, orga-
nize resources and people, and achieve the causes of these people. It is the very notion of
‘creativity’ that popularizes video blogging among young adults (but which is also fun-
damental to activism), which has also been articulated by Touraine and Lievrouw. ‘The
302 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
shift from industrial to post-industrial societies would depend ‘‘much more directly than
ever before on knowledge’’, and hence the capacity of society to call forth creativity’
(Touraine, 1971: 5), although it still remains a question as to whether there has indeed
been such a shift in Malaysia. ‘New social movements tend to be drawn from the ranks
of better educated, creative ‘‘knowledge workers’’; who frame their grievances in sym-
bolic and cultural terms rather than struggle over material goods or economic class inter-
ests’ (Lievrouw, 2011: 42). ‘New media have provided a platform ideally suited to the
concerns of cultural codes, values, creativity, the search for identity, and meaning and
personal experience that typify new social movement’ (Lievrouw, 2011: 42).
Indeed, there is a growing relationship between young adults and video blogging.
Young adults are often ‘led’ to these videos when they click on links that are shared
on their Facebook/Twitter accounts (see also Wallsten, 2010).3 Produced as ‘viral
videos’, the act of sharing, retweeting, and reposting has been cited as one of the fastest,
easiest, and most effective ways of spreading messages online. Viral videos are video
clips that gain widespread popularity on the Internet, typically through video-sharing
sites (YouTube, MetaCafe, and Daily Motion), social media (Facebook, Twitter, Weibo
in China), and email. Although research has been conducted on the relationship between
video-sharing and its popularity on YouTube (see Broxton et al., 2011),4 an improve-
ment in classification and predictive models for understanding online videos is neces-
sary, in terms of mapping out the ‘characteristics’ of viral videos. As a means to
analyze the cultural politics of video blogging, and to understand how these videos are
produced and shared by young Malaysians, this article references several highly popular
online video platforms whilst drawing upon the views of 80 young adults (from 32 in-
depth interviews and eight focus groups) consisting of youth leaders, social media acti-
vists, and active Internet users in the country.5
Always be critical and always push the boundaries . . . this is the everyday way of trying to
make the policies and living environment better . . . as an artist [and activist], you try to
push for more creative ways . . . you try to reflect the world by giving a more critical out-
look and change it for the better through these two elements [art and activism]. (M.L.,
Malaysian filmmaker and activist)
The spread of activism among youth must be considered before contextualizing the var-
ious video blogging activities in Malaysia. Evidence from the fieldwork conducted
revealed that young adults were hesitant to refer to themselves as ‘activists’, and to refer
to their work as ‘activism’. Given that activism is often regarded in a negative light by
right-wing ruling powers (whereby explicit participation in such activities often lead to
grave consequences), these young adults would rather refer to themselves as ‘advocates’,
as ‘responsible rakyats/citizens’ who ‘care for their country’, many defining their work
as ‘subtly political’. As one respondent suggests: ‘Activists always refuse to learn the
rules and break everything . . . we learn the rules to play the game . . . [and] we begin
to change the rules.’
Lim 303
While the term ‘activism’ itself is taboo, resisted, and, to some extent, even feared
among the youth respondents, many felt that their use of videos should not merely mobi-
lize opinion. As interviewee M.C. suggested, ‘a regular Facebook page will simply suf-
fice for that job’, thus, the desired outcome from their efforts in video blogging is often
one that would mobilize actual change. Viral videos, such as those posted by jinny-
boytv.com, for example, often contain humorous/satirical content, including parodies
of political events or national issues (e.g., Only in Malaysia, which has had 3,352,224
views on YouTube6). Eyewitness videos (e.g., videos posted by Internet users following
the worldwide Bersih7 rally in July 2012;8 a child abuse video of an eight-month-old9)
and CCTV footage (e.g., footage of a young Malaysian woman being beaten by her hus-
band) have also achieved widespread ‘viral’ status. The sharing of these videos is seen as
a ‘civic responsibility’, often to press for action to be taken either by relevant authorities
to resolve/respond to the situation, or to mobilize the online community to support a
cause. Nonetheless, to what extent do these viewing habits lead to action and change?
To what extent do the authorities take the number of views into account when deciding
on how to run a country? Does viewing these videos influence a change in mindset and
motivate people to sign petitions against censorship, discrimination, and abuse?
A separate category of video blogging is the production and dissemination of music
videos (such as the Bersih Tribute Song – Tears of Malaysia by Mic Hoo10 and songs
written by singer, songwriter, and activist Mei Chern11 to raise awareness of the lack
of democracy, equality, and freedom of speech in Malaysia), underground, originals and
parodies. More recently, independent films produced primarily for online consumption,
and in response to various online short-video competitions, have become a highly pop-
ular platform among the youth. As I will further exemplify, online video platforms and
projects, such as 15Malaysia(107Malaysia).com, FreedomFilmFest.komas.org, Engage
Media.com, and PopTeeVee.net, among others, act as mediators in encouraging this
emerging form of engagement with video blogging.
Beyond motivating locals to produce their own films primarily to be posted
online, these projects generate interest and encourage consumption of the films
through regular video blogging of trailers and short clips, via Facebook and Twitter.
To a certain extent, Malaysian youths are better equipped (compared to those in
Bangladesh and India) to employ new media both for political expression and indi-
vidual interest. Based on the growing number of Malaysian activist bloggers, there
seems to be a significant group of sophisticated youths who use the new media to
explore political alternatives, despite attempts by the ruling government (or the
state) to control dissent.12
Thus, while at risk of overhyping this platform, video blogging may in fact be crucial
in disseminating or dispersing a type of micro politics that need no longer take a hidden
form of expression. Akin to rhizomatic qualities (Deleuze and Guattari, 1980), social
media allow for the videos to foster connections between the texts and (ultimately)
between the individual bloggers, their online connections, etc. Furthermore, the nature
of the multiplicity, through each video blog, allows for an extension of the rhizome;
when the videos/films are distributed and shared online. It is possible then, to think of
video blogs/video platforms as mediators in this circle of convergence. Although each
of these initiatives may drive different, and at times contrasting and contradictory,
304 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
causes, their varied approaches to content and meaning-making are more enabling than
they are limiting.
According to Miles (2003: 230): ‘[Video blogs] are less about consumption (watching
others’ content) than exploring models for authorship and production . . . it is the ability
to participate as communicative peers that is much more significant and viable for dis-
tributed networks than our reconstitution into new consumers.’ In addition, most video
bloggers look to other video bloggers and friends for feedback and support (Luers, 2007),
which, to a large extent, exemplifies Blumler and Katz’s (1974) uses and gratifications
theory. Luers (2007) further identified several social needs that are fulfilled by video
blogging: a feeling of being connected, finding validation for one’s experience and ideas,
and being a producer as well as a consumer (prosumer). Both Miles and Luers offer very
useful perspectives on understanding video blogging activities, one being the notion of
community, which is hardly surprising given that the primary feature of the Internet is
interconnectivity. Nonetheless, their ideas (along with those of Armstrong and Hagel,
1996; Gupta and Kim, 2004; Li, 2004; Preece, 2000; Wang et al., 2002) also point us
to the fact that the act of sharing and belonging to a ‘community’ takes precedence over
content, reaffirming the earlier argument that the idea of participation is more attractive
than pursuing the actual cause.
To delve deeper into this argument, the politics of Internet usage (which leads to the
critique of video blogging) in the context of Malaysia requires further investigation and
understanding. The notion of video blogging as a form of participation (as highlighted
earlier) becomes even more relevant against the strict control and ownership of the media
in this country (coupled with legislation that threatens and restrains freedom of speech
and information). It means that many have chosen to express their views online, be it via
personal blogs (e.g., Nathaniel Tan, Anil Netto, Zorro Unmasked), or by using indepen-
dent online news portals, such as Malaysiakini.com and MalaysianInsider.com. These
platforms encourage sharing of links via ‘share buttons’ that are strategically placed
on individual pages and videos. In cases where online materials have been viewed as
either ‘opposition-led’, ‘left-wing’, or ‘activist-centered’, their sharing has often been
viewed as participatory activism. Do such forms of participation eventually lead to
significant political/social changes, or, at the very least, provoke critical debate? For
many, online media have been the ‘alternative’ platform, which several researchers
claim (e.g., Zhang and Lim, 2012) has a major influence in persuading undecided voters,
and in mobilizing voters to take political action, as well as even changing the public per-
ceptions of various political/social issues in Malaysia.13
The awareness that this happened as a result of Internet use forced the State to begin
closely monitoring the Internet, to the extent that it proposed the imposition of a ‘Green
Dam’ (akin to China’s Great Firewall) in Malaysia, with a further intention to amend the
current Printing Presses and Publications Act (1984) to include the Internet.14 Although
these proposals were not enforced, due to the strong opposition on the part of netizens,
local non-governmental organizations, youth groups, and the general public, an amend-
ment to the Evidence Act 1950 was passed in parliament (without debate) in April 2012,
and this legislated for ‘presumption of fact in publication’ on the Internet.15 Following
this, a viral video16 was produced by the Center for Independent Journalism (CIJ) and
posted on the International Freedom of Expression Exchange network,17 in addition to
Lim 305
other social media sites, including the website and Facebook page of the CIJ itself, to
create awareness about the Act, and to call for support of the #Stop114A petition.
Such desperate attempts to exercise control over online media often result in users
being compelled to practice self-censorship. Surveillance and/or hacking (by State/reli-
gious authorities) into the social media accounts of various citizens, to keep track of their
‘tweets’ (Twitter), status comments (Facebook), and geographical locations (Four-
square) clearly affected youth political engagements and their use of ICT. Alongside
such repressive activities is a trend to demonize bloggers with statements claiming that
‘the information [in weblogs] is posted . . . by people with no authority . . . [and] may be
. . . provocative, politically-motivated, inaccurate, and is mostly rumors floated for the
interests of certain parties’ (Information Minister Zainuddin Maidin, in Bernama.com,
2007). These conditions become part of the motivation to provoke state dissent, and
encourage the unabated growth of ‘underground’ online activities. In addressing the
issue of (offline) censorship in Malaysia, the youths who participated in the present
research confessed that the Internet is a primary channel to post information that would
otherwise be censored in Malaysia’s mainstream media. Youth activists are somewhat
optimistic that Internet users actively seek information and are constantly forwarded
links to ‘important’ news, especially news involving government policies, general/by-
elections, etc. ‘If the information is important enough, it will reach you no matter what
the form’ (Fahmi Fadzil, Information Chief for the Parti Keadilan Rakyat [PKR] Lembah
Pantai and manager of PopTeeVee.net).
When considering the current social and political conditions within Malaysia, it is
important to revisit ideas of ‘online democracy’ in any discussion of Internet content
posted by (young) Malaysians. Youth leaders use a range of new media resources and
tools to reach out and communicate with the rakyat, especially young adults, on these
issues. Due to their ability to attract high numbers of ‘followers’, Facebook pages/groups
and Twitter accounts exist alongside attempts to find spaces to articulate concerns and
demands. Among the viral videos are those that advocate human/citizen rights, those that
explain alternative information on government policies, those that highlight discrimina-
tory acts carried out by certain (political) parties, and those that raise issues that are
otherwise subject to societal taboo, such as homosexuality/sexual orientations, Orang
Asli land rights, and ethnic/racial prejudices. Democratization of the media is evident
(e.g., through the 107Malaysia project, which will be discussed later) via user-
generated content to user-generated feedback and user-generated distribution (see
Wesch, 2008) and focus group participants agree that members of social media groups
take on an implicit (at times unconscious) sense of social responsibility, whereby ‘what
needs to be shared, must be shared’ for the sake of expanding knowledge and power to
the rest of the online community. However, the production and sharing of these activist
videos do not suggest (and certainly cannot guarantee) that these ‘realities’ (of social/
political issues) are explainable, nor can they even be seen to forge the necessary links
to an ‘explanation’.
The following section draws on examples of online projects and online video-sharing
sites that were frequently cited by interviewees and focus group participants during the
fieldwork; the majority of these young adults were either directly or indirectly involved
in the use of video, the Internet, and free software technologies to engage in video
306 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
blogging. The idea of the ‘prosumer’ (Luer, 2007) within the video blogging community
is clearly evident in these online initiatives that have been set up by local communities to
‘engage with young Malaysians to help create a far more democratic media space’ online
(PopTeeVee, 2012). The aim of these groups is to see young Malaysians create their own
media experience rather than being reduced to mere consumers.
We want women to share their stories about love, and sexuality in a space where they will
have more control, autonomy and they can tell it in their own way . . . hopefully we can share
it with the public and people will understand women better. (M.L., Her Stories Malaysia)
They are encouraged to use the camera as a tool for social documentation and filmmaking
focusing on social issues affecting ordinary people such as HIV/AIDS, poverty and the envi-
ronment. (M.L.) (see Appendix 1 for list of videos on such causes)
Lim 307
It is very accessible to a lot of people who have computers . . . more than 60% of Malaysian
films are wired online, so that’s growing and that’s amazing. We should teach people to use
them responsibly and wisely, critically as well . . . the only way to produce good work is by
being more critical. (M.L.)
Human rights organization Pusat KOMAS (Pusat Komunikasi Masyarakat) was set up in
1993 to support marginalized grassroots communities and NGOs.20 KOMAS runs the
annual FreedomFilmFest (FFF; www.freedomfilmfest.komas.org), in accordance with
its aim to advocate the use of creative and participatory forms of communication to
advance human rights. The FFF program serves as a venue for the Malaysian public
to use video as a tool for special documentation and film-making. Roadshows are orga-
nized to screen and discuss these and other human rights films; one of the most popular
screenings to date is the film Gadoh (dir. Brenda Danker and Namron, 2009).21 Calls for
video proposals are posted bi-weekly, inviting the Malaysian public to document their
stories through film. Facebook posts by FFF encourage participation from the public –
professionals, amateurs, and students:
1 March 2012 – Is it democracy at work when our minister of culture bans a concert when
there are some protests against it by a section of society? How should it be handled? And if
you’re interested in this issue of how the government makes decisions on behalf of the
rakyat, why not submit a film proposal on it?
13 March 2012 – Can you turn this cartoon’s message [The people don’t know their true
power] into a film? We await your proposal.
308 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
2 October 2012 – New activists out there who want your voices and ideas to be heard but
need guidance to organize campaigns and use a variety of tools and methods in spreading
your message, then this is the workshop for you. Come and join us.
The project adopts a recurring theme, ‘Dare to Document, which challenges the public to
share their stories without fear or hesitation, regardless of their background. Subse-
quently, these videos are publicized on Facebook to ensure they reach a wider audience
(and if possible, achieve viral status):
16 June 2012 – How is your Saturday getting along? Want to watch a movie? . . . log on to
FFF website and watch the many award winning movies. Bet it will be interesting and enter-
taining at the same time. Have a great night peeps!
The online platform is very important in helping us disseminate information on key events,
to gather support and get a wider audience for the videos. For example, Selepas Tsunami
received more than 500,000 clicks within two months of it being uploaded. (L.M.Y., studio
coordinator, Pusat KOMAS)
the majority of KOMAS videos (FFF included, the competition per se is directed at
addressing ‘failures’) was to address local sociopolitical problems. The acknowledgment
of failure becomes an easier and more effective narrative strategy because ‘people tend
to agree more on what is going wrong than what is going right’ (Browning and Boudès,
2005; Swoden, 2003) – a communicable story with a shared frustration. Therefore, by
identifying the common enemy (the detractors of human rights), viewers can easily buy
into the narratives, and are further motivated to expand the reach of these videos via
other video-sharing platforms.
Twitter, I don’t know how many people are online at the same time, and because it’s kind of
a stream of consciousness, so after a while the message gets dropped. I think Facebook has a
longer attention span. (F.F., manager of The Fairly Current Show on PopTeeVee.net)
We get comments on our PopTeeVee.net site after each episode, beneath the video player. It
also depends on whom we invite and on the excitement of the issue. What you see is a mass
mobilization if not in terms of physical bodies in the streets, at least in terms of online, in
terms of virtual bodies on the internet . . . this is a very formidable landscape for either side
to partake in and parlay with, to really engage with or to disengage. (F.F.)
310 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
In comparing the strategies adopted by KOMAS (FFF) and PopTeeVee, the latter uses
the lens of pop culture (more specifically from the 1980s and 1990s; Mark Teh, in
Cheong, 2008) heavily, in order to present various political commentaries. This is
reflected in the stylistics and aesthetics of The Fairly Current Show and That Effing
Show. An analysis of the total number of views for videos that ‘went viral’ on Facebook
exemplifies the success of incorporating such a strategy (see Table 2). Nonetheless it is
important that we revisit the origins of PopTeeVee in order to understand the use of
heavily satirical videos by the producers.
PopTeeVee was initiated after the political tsunami in Malaysia whereby there was a
flourishing (or popularizing) of alternative platforms.22 The local art industry was also
building momentum at that time. Artists were demanding free speech and there were
attempts to revive the National Arts Council (set up in April 1952, now defunct). Pop-
TeeVee can be understood as one such activity that was responding to the burgeoning
artistic sphere. Understanding the context, the deliberate use of pop and humor (it was
injected with much humor and sarcasm) became an experimental attempt at negotiation
with the still-nascent art scene, which remains under the strict surveillance of the author-
ities. Indeed, PopTeeVee has produced numerous episodes of political satire, especially
with That Effing Show, which takes advantage of humor as a strategy for indirect criti-
cism. Focus group respondents who suggested that the videos made them ‘think about
politics’ expressed the importance of comedy ensuring that it remained sarcastic, rather
than presenting direct accusations.23 In recent videos, costumes and props were more fre-
quently employed for more efficient representation. Akin to FFF, the programs are pre-
dominantly responsive to local issues, with deliberate attempts to use the local accent,
multi-dialect and other notable words, such as macha and mamak to localize the contents
of the humor (although arguably, this may also be read as a western-educated middle-
class hijacking of the local terms/language). Nonetheless, this appeal to the popular
allows for yet another space enabling/embodying sociopolitical critiques.
warnings, etc.), but they also feature some of the best-known faces in the country, includ-
ing actors, musicians, and top political leaders. Publicized alongside 15Malaysia on the
official website is 107Malaysia, a project that takes the video blogging experience a step
further by encouraging the Malaysian public to participate, albeit in contrast to FFF, as
videos should reflect ‘the country we all love’. A discussion around this theme sparked
questions among focus group participants about what it means to be Malaysian and what
exactly is Malaysian. A video interview (available on YouTube) with the sponsor of
15Malaysia, P1 (Packet One), reveals how the advancement of technology has affected
the direction of the country’s arts and culture industry:
There’s no culture without arts . . . that’s why we are supporting arts . . . without creativity,
there’s no innovation . . . that’s the fundamental why we embark on this project. A Malay-
sia that can talk to each other . . . and understand each other, I think that provides the basic
fundamental for understanding, for arts, and from there we build a better Malaysia. (Michael
Lai, Chief Executive Officer)
CC Puan (Group CEO, P1) further emphasizes the notion of freedom in bringing broad-
band to the people: ‘we want to enable people to bring broadband with them, to bring the
Internet with them, to bring freedom with them’. The aim is to grow and enable the Inter-
net as a platform for discovering Malaysian talents: ‘to be seen, in a way that previously
you couldn’t’ (James Chong, CEO). Invariably, this would become a platform for young
budding directors to experiment with the medium, inspired by the works of independent
film directors Ho Yuhang and the late Yasmin Ahmad.
Here, new media are regarded as an enabling platform, capitalizing on the Internet’s
ability to enable networks, innovations, and creative opportunities. As well as content-
sharing, focus group participants who supported 15Malaysia highlighted the effort
made by the sponsors to further promote the videos via the available e-banners filed
under ‘Goodies’ in the official website.24 Nonetheless, while this view of the media
as an enabling platform has certain similarities with that of PopTeeVee, both have very
different approaches to content and meaning-making. In terms of political jamming,
15Malaysia (or 107Malaysia), made in 2009, is a direct response to the singular
1Malaysia (introduced by Prime Minister Najib Razak in September 2008). This can
be interpreted as a grassroots reclamation of ‘Malaysia’, an appropriation of the
‘1Malaysia’ state ideology, recognizing a ‘nation’ as constitutive and socially con-
structed, and which should therefore be multiplied (from 1 to 15 to 107?), diverse, and
open-ended.25
It may be useful to put into perspective the idea of ‘transference’ via these videos (in
this case, 15Malaysia, garnering over 5 million views – see Table 3). High profile and, at
times, controversial celebrities and politicians are invited to participate in the short films,
which is crucial to garnering public support and attention from the mainstream media.
By associating the cultural products with a person, there is often a potential transfer
of value involved, be it positive or negative.26 Henri Lefebvre’s (1961) theorization of
‘moments’ comes close to describing how we can attempt to make sense of the film’s
effects on the individual who experiences and consumes it. Inevitably, it is the percep-
tions and opinions of the producer, his or her identity, community, nation, nation-state,
312 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
[YouTube]
RedbagMusic channel (Pete Teo) 1067 subscribers; 5,008,512 views; 102 videos:
73 videos of 15Malaysia (with subtitles in different languages)
16 promotional videos (15 The-Making-Of and one video on sponsor)
Six videos of Pete Teo
Five videos of Undilah
Two videos on Here in My Home/Malaysian Artistes for Unity
and the overall struggles of the society for a sense of belonging, which gets transferred
via the video. Nonetheless, for as long as such ‘transfers’ are regarded by the nation-state
as a threat to the ‘national image’ that is itself alien and ‘other’ to its own people, such
videos will continue to be closely monitored and reworked into other forms to reflect ‘the
country we all love’ (107Malaysia, 2012).
Conclusion
This article (and indeed the research itself) has invariably raised more questions than it
has resolved. This was largely due to the scope of the research, which sought to identify
various types of ICTs used by young adults for engagement in civic, community, and
political spheres. Thus, having chosen to focus this article on video blogging, while tak-
ing youth responses to other forms of ICT/new media/social media into account, allows
us to at least begin to address more pertinent issues on engagement levels, motivations,
and implications, rather than be contented with a general overview of the (sluggish) evo-
lution of ICTs in Malaysia.
Indeed, we are seeing complex discourses of politics and ideology within conversations
with these young Malaysians. Video blogging may encourage participatory culture, but,
more importantly, it allows for taboo issues to be raised, expanded, and disseminated, for
the purpose of civic consciousness rather than mere cultural consumption. What is more
obvious is that embedded in these videos are (subtle) allegories of a nation that is strug-
gling to confront ‘real’ issues pertaining to democracy and free speech. Therefore, we must
look further to examine each individual video (rather than collective platforms as pre-
sented here), including personal video channels on online video-sharing platforms that
have garnered ‘high viewership’, and develop a relevant framework to analyze its contents.
More importantly, if the youth are commonly regarded as reformists seeking to
change or to ‘infect’ society with their unworldly views, what we are witnessing is an
attempt by this group27 to re-enter society. This is in accordance with Brake’s suggestion
that ‘youth groups in the structural-functionalist model appear at moments of ‘‘disinte-
grating’’ with a ‘‘reintegrating’’ function’ (see Brake, 1990: 25).28 However, the reinte-
gration of youths into society does not necessarily signify their acceptance of its law (be
it imposed on them or on the nation in general). Superficial actions to reintegrate may
serve only to mask the actual intent of setting up changes in society. Rather than appear
to defend the intentions and needs specific to young people, efforts are increasingly
made by youth leaders to be more society-centered, so their voices become more
Lim 313
dominant than defiant. There is a greater chance for this group to influence changes to
create a ‘new mainstream’ in meeting their specific interests and demands, through pro-
minence gained via video blogging. The ‘creative alternative platform’ of video blog-
ging has opened the door to a new kind of citizen-based ‘grassroots’ journalism;
videos are cheap to produce, do not require extensive skills, and, more importantly, allow
for once-silenced voices to speak out and engage a wider (external) audience.
The online platforms highlighted in this article further exemplify the notion of cul-
tural politics found in video blogging activities. The idea of prosumerism facilitated
by cheap, copyright-free productions has enabled and, to an extent, empowered various
social groups that have long been silenced (or had chosen to be silent due to the culture of
fear) to find their voice in a less threatening, albeit highly significant, form. Glaser
(2008: 33) writes: ‘the world is watching’ the content of blogs ‘to learn about stories the
press in their countries dare not tell’. The spread of videos online reflects a society that is
undergoing fundamental change, both internally and externally, and the key is to allow
these to mobilize the youth in facilitating social/cultural/political changes. Thus, regard-
less of whether Halal (a video on the 15Malaysia list)29 is deemed as information or
entertainment, it has gone viral, has been seen by over 100,000 viewers, has been down-
loaded and further shared offline, parodied, and responded to (via other video postings
online). It will continue to be shared and, inevitably, the sociopolitical nuances
embedded in the film will continue to be transmitted and transferred within and through-
out society, both online and offline.
Appendix 1
EngageMedia.org video listing (Malaysian videos – 13 of 23 videos posted in
2012; all videos listed below were accessed on 23 September 2012)
Indrani Kopal The Tale of Three Women’s Struggle for Justice and Equality. Available
at: www.engageMedia.org/Members/indra05/videos/the-tale-of-three-womens-struggle-
for-justice-and-equality/view
The tale of three women’s struggle for justice and equality, this is about Guppy Union,
which was started by female workers who worked in a plastics factory in Balakong,
Cheras. Their struggle and desire to start a union started 14 years ago, when they were
frustrated with their bosses for increasing their wages by a mere 10 sen.
Christine Leong Pengerang: Where Rain and Tears Mixed. Available at: www.enga
geMedia.org/Members/cjmy/videos/pengerang-where-rain-and-tears-mixed/view
Residents, young and old, gathered in Pengerang between 2 and 5 p.m. on 26 May
2012 to express their feelings regarding the petrochemical project, RAPID.
Lococonut Camp Sambel 2: Learning and Working Together. Available at: www.eng
ageMedia.org/Members/thecamp/videos/the_camp2012_final/view
Continuing the success of Camp Sambel, EngageMedia joined forces with Pusat
Komas to host Camp Sambel 2 in Malaysia. Alumni joined new members to fill the video
camp with videos, fun, music and collaborations in an effort to make a change.
Lococonut Camp Sambel 2: Chat with Arvind Raj. Available at: www.engageMed
ia.org/Members/thecamp/videos/campsambel2_arvind/view
Arvind Raj of ‘Free Malaysia Today’ got the calling to become a video maker when
he was thousands of feet above sea level. Nevertheless, the Camp Sambel 2 videomaker
is all about giving a voice to the minority groups through his writing and videos.
Hisyam Salleh The Forgotten Job: ‘Tukang Kasut’. Available at: www.engageMed
ia.org/Members/thecamp/videos/the_forgotten_job_tukang_kasut/view
We often forget that it is the little things in life that actually complete us. A job as a street
cobbler is often forgotten and considered ‘low class’ to some people. However, his determi-
nation and courage as a cobbler has helped this man to raise his 10 children. This video aims
to become an eye opener to society in that it shows people that they should not look down and
judge someone based on what they do for a living. A job is a job, as long as it is halal.
Tan Kai Swee Everyone Has Hope and the Right to Education. Available at: www.eng
ageMedia.org/Members/tankaiswee/videos/everyone-has-hope-and-the-right-to-educat
ion/view
Lim 315
A group of young Taylor’s College students and lecturers are stepping forward with
their ‘Everyone has hope’ project to empower a select group of Burmese refugee
children from the Chin State in Western Myanmar.
Tan Kai Swee Story of Randy: Abandoned and Stateless. Available at: www.engage
Media.org/Members/tankaiswee/videos/story-of-randy-abandoned-and-stateless/view
This story is about Randy, a boy who was abandoned by his parents a year ago. With-
out parents and any papers, he is considered stateless.
Arvind Raj Transgender Nun: Rights and Rites. Available at: www.engageMedia.org/
Members/thecamp/videos/transgender_nun/view
Transitioning from a man to a woman is the first change in Sharan’s life. She wants to
become a nun by dedicating her life to Bauchara Matha, a deity who is known to be the
protector of the transgender community. The filmmaker follows Sharan on a journey of
several rituals that are rarely performed and have never been recorded on film before.
Appendix 2
PopTeeVee.net programs
These programs are social media dependent (via Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and the
official website [PopTeeVee.net]). There are a total of eight programs and their fre-
quency of activity varies. Each program comprises an independent creative team; how-
ever, there are overlaps. Information in the first five programs was directly copied from
the official website, the latter three programs were written on the basis of conversations
with the producer and from personal video-viewing experience).
Letterman and Jangan Ketawa. . . . The show airs weekly, on Tuesdays, and depending
on the poor Internet connection, sometimes on Wednesdays. . . .
20 Questions
Total: Twelve videos (since September 2008). The basis for new web talk show 20
Questions is simple: Change perceptions, change the world. 20 Questions features
young, ambitious and passionate people who love their jobs. The fact that this is a rar-
ity in our modern day society is alarming and distressing; indicative of a workforce that
is resigned to a mediocre and very likely inadequate life. With 20 Questions, we hope
to dispel the preconceived notion that work cannot be play. While 20 Questions is fun
and can be enjoyed by all ages, the show is primarily aimed at high school and college
students. Since they will soon join the workforce, we hope to help create a more vibrant
and innovative generation of young Malaysians who are not afraid to break out of the
mold to pursue their true passions. 20 Questions is 7 minutes packed with inspiring
information, genuine passion and a lot of laughs. The show features two segments; the
first being the interview, the second featuring a game where our highlighted guest is
asked 20 Questions about his/her job and is required to answer them in 2 minutes.
20 Questions is hosted by David Yeow and Joel Loi, a very fun and funny duo who are
talented and inspiring youths themselves.
Buletin Popek
Total: Six videos (since May 2009) . . . we start to see that the blogosphere is really a
form of crowd-sourced news-wire. What’s really going for it is that there is more journal-
ism happening on blogs than in news rooms. If it is indeed a news wire of sorts, why
aren’t newsrooms accessing the wealth of journalism it generates? And so we have Bule-
tin Popek, an idea still in development. It’s about finding the best bits of relevant news
items on the BlogWire and creating a weekly (eventually to be daily) news program of
the Internet, by the Internets, for the Internets. . . .
#Machagrooming
Total: Six videos (since April 2012) A series of comedy advertisements made for
Rexona Men. Each episode portrays a macha (the main character) in a specific role
(e.g., rock star, customer, sportsman, etc.). Without grooming, he seemed to have lost
his confidence or elegance, and this is where Rexona comes to the rescue (the brand is
not directly represented) and he regains his charisma. The brilliance in this clichéd
advertisement lies in the truthful message on relationships that is conveyed, despite the
branding exercise.
Lim 317
BFM VDO
Total: 32 videos (since January 2012) BFM interview videos.
Funding
The data comes from the ‘Youth, ICTs, and Political Engagement in Asia’ project, which is part of
the PANeGOV initiative supported by the International Development Research Centre in Canada.
The copyright of the data belongs to National University of Singapore.
Notes
1. The Act (amended in 1975) bans students from holding political office in organizations out-
side the university (such as trade unions and political parties) and participating in political ral-
lies; those found guilty risk academic suspension.
2. In an attempt to understand the implications of ICT on youth engagement in civic, cultural,
and political spheres in Malaysia, young adults were identified on the basis of various factors,
including the types/total number of groups listed in their social media pages. The majority of
young adults who were then asked to reiterate the purposes or objectives of these groups were
unable to offer in-depth explanations: ‘Stop Lynas? It’s environmental I think’; ‘Yes, I am a
fan of Chow Kit Kita . . . it’s about human rights, I believe.’ Others struggled to identify all
the groups they ‘liked’ and some were not even aware of their ‘membership’ of the groups.
3. Wallsten (2010) assesses the interplay between online viewership, blog discussion and main-
stream media coverage of the most popular online political video of the 2008 campaign; will.i.
am’s ‘Yes We Can’ music video. Using time series analysis, he found strong evidence that
blog discussion, not the size of the online audience, played a crucial role both in guiding Inter-
net users to the video and, more importantly, in driving mainstream media coverage.
4. Broxton et al. (2011) refers to this relationship as the ‘socialness’ of videos, which is quanti-
fied by classifying the referrer sources for video views as social (e.g. an emailed link) or non-
social (e.g. a link from related videos). While it was found that highly social videos behave
differently from the latter (i.e. highly social videos rise to, and fall from, their peak popularity
more quickly), the authors conclude that not all highly social videos become popular, and not
all popular videos are highly social. Furthermore, only 21% of videos that generate large
volumes of views over a short period of time can be classified as viral.
5. Individual interviewees (youth activists) were identified at several youth conferences, includ-
ing Youth’10 (28–30 May 2010); Asia Pacific Youth Conference (28 July–2 August 2010),
and Malaysia Young Female Entrepreneur Forum (26–27 October 2010). Focus group parti-
cipants were selected based on a snowball sampling strategy – the initial group also consisted
of young participants approached at various workshops/conferences organized for young
Malaysians. Interview/focus group sessions were transcribed and categorized based on rele-
vant keywords, e.g., civil/community/politics, videos, activism, citizen, social media.
6. Only in Malaysia: www.jinnyboytv.com/?p¼138 or www.youtube.com/watch?v¼JiosPxt_
5kw&feature¼player_embedded#!
318 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
7. On 9 July 2011, approximately 30,000 Malaysians marched along the streets of Kuala Lumpur
to press for a fair and just election. Over a million gathered online to show support by ‘liking’
Facebook groups, installing Bersih PictBadges and changing their profile pictures to yellow-
filled images. Malaysians residing in Singapore rallied online, given the regulations against
public assembly enforced in that country. An estimate of 5000 others, mostly ‘fans’ of the
Bersih 2.0 Facebook page assembled in 38 other countries for this cause. Those who marched
constantly updated their blogs, Facebook and Twitter accounts. Countless others stayed con-
nected indoors, collating information and reposting images of tear-gassed victims while
reflecting on the future of Malaysia. Events leading up to the mass rally calling for electoral
reform has challenged the way young adults engage with new media in Malaysia.
8. A YouTube channel dedicated to video postings on the Bersih rally – #bersih428 (194 videos,
1,653,517 views): www.youtube.com/user/bersih428?feature¼results_main
9. The video ‘Insane Malaysian mother beats up 8-month baby’ was shared over 16,000 times on
Facebook, with over 1,217,005 views. The woman involved has been charged and sentenced
to 18 months in prison. The video was circulated to encourage the community to sign an online
petition in order to request a longer sentence.
10. www.youtube.com/user/michootube?feature¼results_main
11. Songs/lyrics by Mei Chern include: Do You See Me Like You: www.youtube.com/watch?
v¼k3xYPcZBy60; Good Intentions: www.youtube.com/watch?v¼8ZGsKzMMR1s&
feature¼related.
12. Other types of viral videos/platforms popular among young activists include 9gag.com/
videos; nuffnang.com.my; viralvideos.com/tag/Malaysia.
13. Thus, post-2008 general elections following a large number of parliamentary seats being won
by incumbents from the Opposition party (many of whom attested to their use of social media
as the main factor), members of the ruling coalition (Barisan Nasional) began actively posting
on their blogs, Facebook and Twitter.
14. Following a similar motion in 2006, in 2011, the state again proposed that the existing
Printing Presses and Publications Act be amended to include electronically mediated
forms of communication, namely the Internet, which would allow monitoring and censor-
ship of yet another public domain. This received much criticism from the general public,
especially activist bloggers (National Alliance of Bloggers) who had already been sub-
jected to intense scrutiny from the state, while being threatened by the Internal Security
Act. Public protest led to temporary retraction of the proposed amendment and it remains
‘under review’.
15. The Act states that any owner, administrator, host, editor, subscriber of a network or website,
or owner of computer or mobile device is presumed to have published or republished its con-
tents. It has wide-ranging reach and extends not only to practically everyone who uses any
internet platform, from email and social media to blogs and online media, but also those who
do not.
16. www.youtube.com/watch?v¼YBWQHYO2BpI&feature¼player_embedded; 28,689 views.
17. #Stop114A petition and video posted on IFEX - www.ifex.org/malaysia/2012/08/15/evi-
dence_act/
18. Adopting a more ‘emergent approach’ to online video distribution, EngageMedia takes into
account the uneven access to high speed Internet and the need to offer both online and offline
video distribution tools (as in the case of Indonesia – see Mauro-Flude, 2010). Where the
Lim 319
Internet is unavailable or unaffordable, the organization helps grassroots groups to use the
technology to develop their communities and to further their rights, calling for government
policies to serve the best interests of the general population, especially people living in devel-
oping countries.
19. Anonymity granted in the best interest of the respondent.
20. In many instances, KOMAS has been focused on highly localized issues; working closely with
the rural communities where workshops have been specifically crafted to help them create a
sustainable resistant/empowered force.
21. Gadoh highlights racial relations amongst two groups of students who fight each other based
on racial lines, social environment, and the school system.
22. Five Arts Centre (a theatre organization of which Mark Teh is a part) produced the Emergency Fes-
tival (October 2008) immediately post-tsunami. The more well-known short film produced in tandem
with this event is Fahmi Reza’s Sepuluh Tahun Sebelum Merdeka (2008, produced by Mark Teh).
23. The host’s (Ezra Zaid) statements are usually followed by a diegetic space illustrating the
absurdity of the probabilities of outcomes and consequences for certain actions (e.g., the ban
on Erykah Badu, the publication of a propaganda comic by Barisan Nasional, the creation of
Ah Jib Gor’s interest page).
24. It is useful to note that all information is available on the website in four languages: English,
Malay, Chinese and Tamil.
25. Note the witty ‘mymalaysia’ in the URL of 107Malaysia: 15malaysia.com/mymalaysia/
26. The same approach is used in most of Pete Teo’s project, such as the making of the video Here
in My Home and Undilah.
27. In reflecting the state’s mindset in addressing youth as a singular entity (evident in the various
‘blanket’ laws, accusations and assumptions made of ‘Malaysian youth’).
28. The notion of integration is also a much-emphasized term in Malaysia’s Vision 2020, where
present conditions of racial tolerance should instead become racial integration in accordance
with the country’s aim to be known as a developed nation.
29. Liew Seng Tat (2009) Halal. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v¼YfAnZooGeuc&fea
ture¼player_embedded.
A Malay lady explains to a Chinese lady the concept of Halal meat and the methods to ensure its Halal
status. She also mentions that Halal meat is good for all, including those who are not Muslims.
References
15Malaysia (2012) FAQ. 15Malaysia. Available at: 15malaysia.com/faq/ (accessed 29 May 2012).
107Malaysia (2012) 15Malaysia. Available at: 15malaysia.com/mymalaysia/ (accessed 29 May
2012).
Andrew (2010) Camp Sambel. EngageMedia.org. Available at: www.engageMedia.org/sambel-en
(accessed 2 June 2012).
Armstrong A and Hagel J (1996) The real value of on-line communities. Harvard Business Review
74(3): 134–141.
Bernama.com (2007) Don’t quote blog websites, newspapers told. 20 March. Available at: www.
bernama.com/bernama/v3/bm/printable.php?id¼252337 (accessed on 10 March 2012).
Blumler JG and Katz E (1974) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Grat-
ifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
320 the International Communication Gazette 75(3)
Brake M (1990) Comparative Youth Culture: The Sociology of Youth Cultures and Youth Subcul-
tures in America, Britain and Canada. London: Routledge.
Browning L and Boudès T (2005) The use of narrative to understand and respond to complexity: A
comparative analysis of the Cynefin and Weickian models E:CO 7: 3–4.
Broxton T, Interian Y, Vaver J and Wattenhofer M (2011) Catching a viral video. Journal of Intel-
ligent Information Systems 1–19.
Cheong N (2008) Fairly Current, very exciting. The Star Online, 7 August 2008. Available at: thes-
tar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file¼/2008/8/17/lifearts/1792954&sec¼lifearts (accessed 25
May 2012).
Deleuze G and Guattari F (1980) A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Massumi B (Mille Plateaux. Capit-
alism and Schizophrenia, Vol. 2). London and New York: Continuum/ Paris: Les Editions de
Minuit.
EngageMedia (2012) Time for reel action. EngageMedia.org. Available at: www.engageMedia.
org/climate-crisis (accessed 1 June 2012).
Frith S (1998) Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni-
versity Press.
Gilroy P (1993) The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Har-
vard University Press.
Glaser M (2008) What really makes a blog shine? Handbook for Bloggers and Cyber-dissidents.
Paris: Reporters Without Borders, pp. 32–35.
Gupta S and Hee-Woong K (2004) Virtual community: Concepts, implications, and future research
directions. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, 6–8 August 2004.
Highmore B (2001) Everyday Life and Cultural Theory: An Introduction. New York: Taylor and
Francis.
Jenkins H (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. Studies in Culture
and Communication. New York: Routledge.
Lefebvre H (1961) Critique de la vie quotidienne II: Fondements d’une sociologie de la quotidien-
nete´. [Moore, J, trans. (2002) Critique of Everyday Life: Foundations for a Sociology of the
Everyday. Critique of Everyday Life series, Vol. 2. London: Verso.]
Li H (2004) Virtual community studies: A literature review, synthesis, and research agenda. In:
Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York.
Lievrouw LA (2011) Alternative and Activist New Media. Cambridge: Polity.
Luers W (2007) Cinema without show business: Poetics of vlogging. Post Identity 5(1). Available
at: hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.pid9999.0005.2105 (accessed 3 May 2012).
Mauro-Flude N (2010) EngageMedia local archives project, Indonesia. EngageMedia.org, 30
April. Available at: www.engageMedia.org/Members/sister0/news/local-archives-project-se-
cond-and-third-phase-yogyakarta-indonesia (accessed 2 June 2012).
Miles A (2003) Softvideography. In: Eskelinen M and Koskimaa R (eds) Cybertext Yearbook
2002–2003. Saarijavi: University of Jyvaskyla, pp. 218–236.
Plumi (2011) About us: Critical commons: For fair and critical participation in media culture.
Available at: criticalcommons.org/about-us (accessed 2 June 2012).
PopTeeVee (2012) About us: Some Information on information. PopTeeVee. Available at: www.
PopTeeVee.net/about.aspx (accessed 26 May 2012).
Preece J (2000) Online Communities: Designing Usability Supporting Sociability. Chichester:
John Wiley and Sons.
Lim 321
Shiano DJ, Nardi BA, Gumbrecht M and Swartz L (2004) Blogging by the rest of us. In: ACM
Conference on Computer Human Interaction, Vienna, 24–29 April 2004.
Street J (1997) Politics and Popular Culture. Cambridge: Polity.
Swoden D (2003) Managing for serendipity or why we should lay off ‘best practices’ in KM.
Knowledge Management 6(8). Available at: www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/wisirc/snow.pdf
(accessed 25 May 2012).
Touraine A (1971) The Post-industrial Society: Tomorrow’s Social History: Classes, Conflicts and
Culture in the Programmed Society. New York: Random House.
Wallsten K (2010) ‘Yes we can’: How online viewership, blog discussion, campaign statements,
and mainstream media coverage produced a viral video phenomenon. Journal of Information
Technology and Politics 7(2): 163–181.
Wang Y, Yu Q and Fesenmaier DR (2002) Defining the virtual tourist community: Implications
for tourism marketing. Tourism Management 23(4): 407–417.
Wesch M (2008) An Anthropological Introduction to YouTube [online video]. Available at: www.
youtube.com/watch?v¼TPAO-lZ4_hU (accessed 26 May 2012).
Willis PE (1978) Profane Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Zhang W and Lim J (2012) Social media and general elections in authoritarian democracies: The cases
of Malaysia and Singapore. In: International Communication Association (ICA) Pre-conference:
New Media and Citizenship in Asia: Social Media, Politics, and Community-Building, Arizona
State University, USA, 22–28 May 2012.