Factors Influencing Student Preferences for

Hydration Container Materials

Buanoy, Balamban, Cebu

A Research Study
Presented to the Faculty of the Senior High School Department
Buanoy National High School
Buanoy, Balamban, Cebu

In Partial Fulfillment of their Requirements in the Subject

Inquiries Investigation and Immersion

Submitted to

Anna Liza V. Paubsanon

By

Barbecho, Dyjel Babe, C.

Aligato, Lorenz Keith
Galleros, Lloyd
Segovia, Adrian
Deguma, Angel May
Cristoria, Jeannette

2024
 i

APPROVAL SHEET
 ii

ABSTRACT

Tile: FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENT

PREFERENCES FOR HYDRATION
CONTAINER MATERIALS

Researcher: Barbecho, Dyjel Babe, C.

Aligato, Lorenz Keith

Galleros, Lloyd

Segovia, Adrian

Deguma, Angel May

Cristoria, Jeannette

Strand: Accountancy, Business, and Management

School: Buanoy National High School

Teacher: Anna Liza V. Paubsanon

Date Completed: April, 2024

This research study investigates the factors influencing student preferences for

hydration container materials among Grade-12 students in the academic track at

Buanoy National High School. The study utilizes a quantitative research design and

descriptive research methodology to collect data through an adopted survey

questionnaire. The questionnaire aims to explore various factors, including material

preferences, brand reputation, and cost evaluation, along with the primary preferences

such as aesthetic appeal, texture and feel, and durability consideration. The collected

data is analyzed using statistical tools such as Likert scale, average weighted mean,

tabulation, and scoring procedures.

The findings reveal a valuable insights into the factors influencing student

preferences for hydration container materials, categorizing material preferences, brand

 iii

reputation, and cost evaluation, along with aesthetic appeal, texture and feel, and

durability consideration as an important factors that influence students’ preferences in

choosing a hydration container materials. The study also reveal a significant

relationship between the respondents' profile and students' preferences underscores

the importance of understanding the demographic characteristics of the target

population when designing and marketing hydration containers.

Keywords:

○ Hydration container materials

○ Material preferences

○ Brand reputation

○ Cost evaluation

○ Aesthetic appeal

○ Texture and feel

○ Durability consideration
 iv

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to all those who have
contributed to the successful completion of this research study on student preferences
for hydration container materials.

First and foremost, we extend our sincere appreciation to the administration of

Buanoy National High School for granting us permission to conduct this research
within their institution. We are grateful for their support and cooperation throughout
the data collection process.

We would like to thank the Grade-12 students of the academic track at Buanoy
National High School for their participation in the survey and for sharing their
valuable insights and preferences. Without their willingness to be part of this study,
this research would not have been possible.

We are deeply indebted to our research advisor for their guidance, expertise, and
valuable feedback throughout the research process. Their insights and suggestions
have been instrumental in shaping the direction and quality of this study.

We would also like to express our gratitude to our colleagues and friends who
have provided support, encouragement, and assistance throughout this research
journey. Their valuable input and discussions have enriched our understanding of the
topic and have contributed to the overall quality of this study.

Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the researchers and scholars whose work

we have referenced in this study. Their contributions to the field have been invaluable

in shaping our research design and analysis.

Once again, we extend our heartfelt appreciation to all those who have

contributed to this research in various ways. Your support and collaboration have been

instrumental in the successful completion of this study.

 v

Dedication

This research is dedicated to the Grade-12 students of Buanoy National High

School, whose participation and insights have been the driving force behind this study.

Your willingness to share your preferences and perspectives has been invaluable in

shaping the findings and recommendations of this research.

We also dedicate this research to the educators and administrators of Buanoy

National High School, who work tirelessly to create an enabling learning environment

for students. Your commitment to the education and well-being of students has

inspired us throughout this research journey.

Furthermore, we dedicate this research to our families and friends, whose

unwavering support and encouragement have been a constant source of motivation.

Your belief in our abilities and your understanding of the demands of this research

have been instrumental in our success.

Lastly, we dedicate this research to the future generations of students and

researchers who will continue to explore and contribute to the field of consumer

preferences and sustainable practices. May this research serve as a stepping stone

towards creating a supportive and environmentally conscious society.

 vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE

APPROVAL SHEET ………………………………………………….………i

ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………….……….ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .…………………………………………………..iv

DEDICATION ……………………………………………………….……….v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………..……..……….vi

LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………….ix

LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………….………..x

CHAPTER 1 ………………………………………………………..………...1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

Rationale …………………………………………………………….…..1

Theoretical Background ………………...……………………………….3

THE PROBLEM

Statement of the Problem ………………………………………………..8

Hypothesis………………………………………………………………..9

Significance of the Study ………………………………………………..9

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Design …………………………………………………………11

Research Environment …………………………………………………..11

Research Respondents …………………………………………………..13

Research Instrument …………………………………………………….13

Research Procedure ……………………………………………………..14

 vii

Data Collection ………………………………………………………….16

Data Analysis ………………………………………………….………...16

Trustworthiness of Research…………………………………………….18

DEFINITION OF TERMS …………………………………………………18

CHAPTER 2…………………………………………………………………20

PRESENTATION, INTERPRETATION, AND ANALYSIS OF DATA

Respondent's Profile …………………………………………………….….20

Factors Influences in Selecting a Hydration Container Material

Material preferences…………………………………………….…….21

Brand Reputation……………………………………………………..23

Cost Evaluation…………………………………………………….…24

The Primary Material Preferences in Choosing a Hydration Container Material

Aesthetic Appeal……………………………………………….……..25

Texture and Feel………………………………………………………26

Durability Consideration……………………………………….……..27

CHAPTER 3 …………………………………………………………………32

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSION

Summary……………..………………………………………………….32

Findings……………….…………………………………………………32

Conclusion…………………………………………………………….…33
 viii

CHAPTER 4

Recommendation ………………………………………………………34

REFERENCE LIST …………………………………………………….…36

APPENDICES

A. Letter of Transmittal………………………………………………..41

B. Questionnaire……………………………………………………….42

C. Computation of Data……………………………………………….44

CURRICULUM VITAE ………………………………………………….54

 ix

List of Figures

Figure Description Page

1 Theoretical Background 7

2 BNHS Map 12

3 Flow of the Study 15

 x

List of Tables

Table Description Page

1 Distribution of Respondent 13

2 Scoring Procedure 17

3 Respondent’s Profile 20

4 Material Preferences 22

5 Brand reputation 23

6 Cost Evaluation 24

7 Summary 25

8 Aesthetic Appeal 26

9 Texture and Feel 27

10 Durability Consideration 28

11 Summary 29

12 Significant relationship when analyzed by Gender 30

13 Significant relationship when analyzed by Age 30

 1

Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

INTRODUCTION

Rationale

In today's health-conscious society, the choice of a drinking water bottle goes

beyond mere practicality. Consumers now consider various factors when selecting a

water bottle, such as material, appearance, durability, and so on. Plastic bottle material

is perhaps the most well-known among consumers water bottles. Polyethylene

Terephthalate or PET is 100% recyclable and is used to make convenient plastic water

bottles in various sizes, as well as water gallon jugs. This can easily be identified with

the first recycling code around or at the bottom of the bottle. While most recognized

as the material for water bottles, PET is also extensively used for storing various food

items and beverages, including peanut butter, salad dressings, baked goods, pasta

sauces, soft drinks, juices, beer, and wine. What are Water Bottles Made of? | My

Own Water., (2023).

Due to the escalating awareness of the detrimental impact of a disposable

plastic bottle on the environment, many nations prompted to impose restrictions,

fostering a widespread shift towards reusable hydration containers. This transition

aligns with the growing preference for high-quality hydration containers, reflecting

increased disposable income and a desire for products that resonate with eco-friendly

values and evolving lifestyles. The increasing awareness of the health benefits of

staying hydrated and the growing trend of outdoor activities, sports, and fitness have

fueled the demand for hydration containers, particularly water bottles. As a result,

many companies have introduced innovative designs and features in their water
 2

bottles, such as insulated and collapsible models, to attract more customers and gain a

competitive edge in the market. Global Hydration Containers Market Report and

Forecast 2024-2032., (2024).

As the worldwide market for hydration containers is experiencing significant

expansion, driven by shifting consumer preferences towards health-conscious and

sustainable living. The growing realization of hydration's fundamental role in

preserving one's well-being has surged the demand for flexible, environmentally

conscious hydration containers on a global scale. As disposable income continues to

grow, people are opting for high-quality hydration containers that not only match their

Eco-sensitive beliefs but also accommodate their evolving lifestyles. These on-the-go

containers provide a practical solution for staying hydrated throughout the day, a

fundamental aspect of maintaining overall health and productivity. The emphasis on a

sustainable lifestyle further underscores the alignment of personal well-being with

Eco-conscious choices, emphasizing environmental preservation for future

generations. Hydration containers market., (2022).

Through a comprehensive investigation, this study will thoroughly assess

essential aspects such as material preferences, brand reputation, cost evaluation,

aesthetic appeal, texture and feel, and durability consideration, providing a

comprehensive evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses related to students'

preferences for hydration containers materials. By exploring a range of options for

hydration containers, the research aims to enrich conversations surrounding these

choices, empowering consumers—specifically students—to make informed decisions

aligned with their individual preferences and values. Moreover, the insights obtained

from this study can be utilized by manufacturers to enhance their product offerings,

creating hydration containers that align with consumer expectations and contribute to
 3

fostering sustainability and health consciousness within society. Ultimately, this

research seeks to bridge the gap between consumer preferences in hydration container

choices emphasizing the importance of thoughtful material selection and sustainable

design in hydration container choices.

Theoretical Background

This study anchored the Theory of Planned Behavior by Ajzen (1991) and a

sub-theory, Consumer Demographic Theory by Michael and Becker (1973). This

theory will serve as a theoretical framework for understanding the factors influencing

student preferences for hydration container materials.

The Theory of Planned Behavior by Ajzen (1991) asserts that intentions

shape behaviors and are influenced by three key factors. Firstly, attitudes represent an

individual's personal evaluation or feelings toward engaging in a specific behavior,

encompassing beliefs about whether the behavior is favorable or unfavorable.

Secondly, subjective norms involve the perceived social pressures or expectations

from others regarding the performance of the behavior, considering the influence of

social factors and the individual's perception of others' expectations. Lastly, perceived

behavioral control reflects the individual's belief in their ability to successfully

execute the behavior, including the perception of control over factors that may

facilitate or hinder the behavior. Additionally, the theory recognizes that external

factors can directly impact behaviors, regardless of intentions, depending on the

degree of control the individual has over the behavior and the accuracy of perceived

behavioral control in reflecting actual control. (Brookes, 2023)

 4

According to Ruangkanjanases., et al (2020), this theory states that

consumers’ attitudes toward their realized behavior are based on their subjective

behavioral belief in the product or service and their cognitive evaluation of the

possible results; these attitudes may be affected by the subjective norms derived from

the more objective specifications of the faith on the consumption and obedience

motivation of the consumer. In addition, this theory also has been extensively applied

to the study of pro-environmental behaviors, including water conservation (Singha et

al, 2022) and environmentally friendly purchases (Mustafa et al, 2022). According to

Hong (2009), health consciousness is about how much people care about their well-

being. This includes being aware of their health, taking personal responsibility, and

having the motivation to stay healthy. Studies consistently show that health

consciousness predicts whether someone will adopt healthy behaviors or act in

environmentally friendly ways.

Although there is limited research literature employing the Theory of

Planned Behavior. At the present, the primary research outcomes can be summarized

as follows: Saefi et al. (2023) used the TPB to recognized the significant factors of

the students in driving tap water consumption; Xu et al. (2022) used the TPB to

explore the influencing factors and mechanism of consumer green purchase behavior;

Fedi et al. (2021) conducted the TBH to their paper to understand the influence of

attitudes, norms, and perceived behavior control on the intention to drink tap water

from reusable bottles; Guo et al. (2021) used the TPB to examine the costumers'

perception toward the three aspects before purchasing bottled water online; Judge et

al. (2019) used the TBH to investigate the factors predicting homebuyers' intentions to

purchase a dwelling with a sustainability certification. While the literature on TPB

 5

applications may be limited, these studies demonstrate its versatility in understanding

behavioral intentions across various domains.

Consumer Demographic Theory by Michael and Becker (1973). The

integration of consumer demographic theory into the study elevates its significance by

examining how various demographic variables, including education level, age, gender,

family status, employment status, and income level as identified by Michael & Becker

(1973), influence students' preferences for hydration container materials. This

approach provides a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted factors shaping

hydration container choices among students. By acknowledging the impact of

demographic characteristics, the study not only contributes to academic discussions

but also offers practical insights for manufacturers, enabling them to align their

product offerings with the diverse needs and preferences of specific demographic

segments.

According to Musso et al. (2022), the different age groups have little effect

on the intent to buy brands. In addition, Jain, and Sharma (2012) conducted other

similar types of research work, arguing that consumers of different age groups have

different attitudes towards brands and the intention to purchase various fast-moving

goods. Madahi and Sukati (2012) conducted another research, confirming that

younger consumers are more important in influencing buying intention on consumer

label products. As customer age increases, the effect of age on the intention to buy

becomes more significant. This study was also previously used by researchers such as

Karami et al. (2017) in their study on key cultural underlying consumers' buying

behavior, which linked demographic factors such as age, gender, and income to

purchase decisions; B Rai (2017) in his study on the effect of demographic factors on
 6

consumer purchase intention in buying a television set; and Lugioyo (2023) in his

study on demographic variables that influence purchase behavior.

Furthermore, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and consumer

demographic theory will serve as a theoretical framework for understanding the

factors influencing Grade-12 students in academic strands preferences for hydration

container materials at Buanoy National High School.

 7

Theory of Planned Behavior by Ajzen

(1991)

Consumer Demographic Theory by

Michael and Becker (1973)

Attitudes Subjective Perceived

Norms Behavioral
Control

Material Social Aesthetic appeal

preferences Pressures
Texture and feel
Brand
Reputation Durability
Consideration
Cost Evaluation

Behavioral
Intentions

Factors Influencing Student

Preferences for Hydration
Container Materials

Figure 1.
Theoretical Background
 8

THE PROBLEM

Statement of the Problem

This study aims to determine the factors influencing student preferences for

hydration container materials among Grade 12 students in academic track at Buanoy

National High School.

Specifically, this will seek to answer the following.

1. Profile Respondent

1.1. Gender

1.2 Age

2. What factors influence students’ choices when selecting a hydration container

material in the context of sustainable living in terms of.

2.1. Material preferences

2.2. Brand Reputation

2.3. Cost evaluation

3.What are the primary material preferences among students when choosing hydration

containers material in terms of.

3.1. Aesthetic appeal

3.2. Texture and feel

3.3. Durability Consideration

4. Is there any significant relationship between the respondent’s profile and students’

preferences in choosing a hydration container material?

 9

Hypothesis

This study is designed to assess the hypothesis of the factors influencing

Grade-12 students in academic track preferences for hydration container materials at

Buanoy National High School.

H0: Respondent’s profile has no significant influence on student preferences in

choosing a hydration container.

H1: Respondent’s profile has significant influence on student preferences in choosing

a hydration container.

Significance of the Study

This study provides an overview of Grade-12 students in academic track

preferences in hydration container materials, offering valuable insights for consumers

seeking reliable options.

This study will be beneficial to the following people:

Consumers (Students). Students can choose water bottles that match what they like,

making it more enjoyable for them to stay hydrated throughout the day.

Hydration container manufacturers. Manufacturers can improve their water bottle

designs and materials based on student preferences, making bottles that students like

to use.

Marketers. People who advertise and sell water bottles can use the study's

information to create ads that talk about what students like in a bottle, helping them

sell more bottles.

Educational Institutions. Schools can use the study to choose water bottles that

students prefer, making it easier for students to stay hydrated.

 10

Future Researchers. This study paves the way for future research to delve deeper

into consumer behavior, product preferences, and evolving trends in hydration

container choices, incorporating additional variables and conducting longitudinal

analyses.
 11

Research Methodology

Research Design

The researcher uses a quantitative study design and descriptive research

design to examine the material preferences of hydration container materials among

Grade- 12 students in academic track at Buanoy National High School.

Research Environment

This research will take place at Buanoy National High School, specifically

targeting 20% of the Grade-12 students in each academic strand’s population as a

respondent. The selection of Buanoy National High School as the research site allow

for a focused examination within a familiar educational context. This focused

approach ensures relevance within the school's setting and provides a detailed

understanding of the factors influencing hydration container materials choices among

Grade- 12 students in the academic track.

 12

Figure 2.

BNHS Map
 13

Research Respondent

The target respondents of this study will be the 20% of each Grade 12

students from academic strands such as ABM, HUMSS, and STEM strand at Buanoy

National High School Campus during the Second semester of SY 2023-2024. A table

is presented below, where the total population of each strand (N) is 510 with a sample

size (n) of 103.

Table 1.
Distribution of Respondent
N= 510

Strands Total population (N) 20% of the population

ABM 103 21

STEM 103 21

HUMSS 304 61

Sample size (n) 103

Research Instrument

This study adapted the criteria utilized by Caroline Atwell (2019) on her

study Assessment of Factors that Impact Hydration Status of Professional and

Collegiate Mascots. The questionnaire is thoughtfully designed to explore various

facets, encompassing the types of hydration containers commonly favored by students

and the underlying factors that shape their preferences. To ensure a comprehensive

and representative insight, 20% of each academic strand will be randomly selected as

a respondent through a stratified random sampling method. The survey employs a

scoring mechanism utilizing a Likert scale, allowing participants to express their

 14

preferences through quantifiable responses. This approach not only facilitates ease of

data collection but also aids in the subsequent analysis of the gathered data. The

Likert scale responses play a crucial role in unveiling valuable insights into the

nuanced factors influencing student preferences for hydration containers.

Research Procedure

The research procedure commenced with the adapted survey questionnaires

aligned with the statement of the problem. These questionnaires, serving as input,

aimed to gather information on student preferences for hydration containers.

Following the IPO, the survey questions addressed aspects like types of container

materials commonly used and factors influencing preferences. The data collection

process involved administering the questionnaires to the representative respondent in

each academic strand, chosen through a stratified random sampling method. Moving

to the processing phase, the Likert scale responses obtained from the surveys

underwent systematic analysis using statistical tools. The goal of this well-structured

research procedure was to attain a comprehensive understanding of the factors

influencing student preferences for hydration containers.

 15

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

1. Profile Respondent
1.1. Gender
1.2 Age

2.What factors  Survey

influences students’ distribution
choices when selecting a
hydration container
material in the context
of sustainable living in
terms of.  Data
2.1. Material Collection
Preferences
2.2. Brand
Reputation
2.3. Cost Evaluation To determine the
 Data factors influencing
3.What are the primary Analysis student preferences for
material preferences hydration container
among students when materials
choosing hydration
containers material in  Data
terms of. Interpretation
3.1. Aesthetic Appeal
3.2. Texture and feel
3.3. Durability
Consideration
 Conclusion
4. Is there any
significant relationship
between the
respondent’s profile and
students’ preferences in
choosing hydration
container materials?

Figure 3.
Flow of the Study
 16

Data Collection

To gather essential insights into student preferences for hydration containers,

the research initiated the data collection process by adapting a survey questionnaire.

These questionnaires were meticulously designed to align with the research objectives

stated in the problem statement, focusing on factors such as container types

commonly used and elements influencing preferences. Following the Input, Process,

and Output (IPO) the surveys were then administered to a diverse and representative

subset of each academic strands. A stratified random sampling method was employed

to ensure fairness in participant selection, providing a comprehensive data set that

accurately reflects the preferences within the broader student population.

Data Analysis

The Likert scale responses obtained from the surveys underwent a systematic

examination using statistical tools. This analytical approach aimed to uncover

hydration container material preferences within the collected data, emphasizing the

exploration of types of container materials frequently utilized and the influential

factors shaping student preferences. By employing statistical techniques, the research

sought to derive relevant insights that contribute to a comprehensive understanding of

the intricate dynamics governing student choices in hydration container preferences.

The methodical data analysis process enhances the reliability and validity of the

research findings, ensuring a robust foundation for drawing meaningful conclusions.

Likert scale. Play a crucial role in unveiling valuable insights into the

nuanced factors influencing student preferences for hydration containers.

 17

Average Weighted Mean. This tool will be used to assign greater significance

to certain data values over others, ultimately exerting a greater influence on

the final average.

Tabulation. This approach will be employed to assess the factors influencing

students' preferences in choosing hydration containers.

Scoring Procedure. To evaluate the factors influencing students’ preferences

in hydration containers, it has been categorized into four scales as outlined in

the following description.

In assessing the factors influencing student preferences in hydration

container, it is modified into four scales following the given description,

Weigh Range Scale Verbal Description

t
4 3.26-4.00 Most The highest level of importance,
Important indicating that the factor strongly
influences the decision-making
process.
3 2.51-3.25 Important The factor is crucial and
significantly influences the
decision-making process.
2 1.76-2.50 Moderately The factor has a moderate
Important influence on the decision-making
process.
1 1.0-1.75 Not The factor holds minimal
Important significance in the decision-
making process.

Table 2.
Scoring procedure
 18

Trustworthiness of Research

Ensuring the trustworthiness of this research is crucial. We took careful steps

to collect data systematically, making sure to include a diverse group of ABM strand

students. The survey questions were thoroughly tested for clarity and relevance. We

were transparent about how we conducted the research, using established theories like

the Theory of Planned Behavior. Throughout the process, we sought feedback from

peers and continuously reflected on our methods. By sticking to these principles, we

aim to provide reliable and credible results that everyone can trust.

Definition of Terms

ABM. Accountancy And Business Management

BNHS. Buanoy National High School

TPB. The Theory of Planned Behavior

Hydration container materials. Refers to the substance or composition used in the

construction of water bottles or containers designed for holding and dispensing liquids,

such as plastics, stainless steel, glass, or other materials.

Eco-sensitive. Having a heightened awareness of and consideration for environmental

concerns and sustainability.

Aesthetic. A set of principles concerned with the nature and appreciation of beauty.

Functional features. Are manufactured features which perform a particular function.

Unlike rounds and drafted faces, functional features generally come later in the design

process and thus do not affect the “form” of the model.

Social factors. Are circumstances or situations that affect people's lifestyle and well-

being.

Plastic bottle. Is a bottle constructed from high-density or low-density plastic.

 19

Stainless steel. Is a durable and corrosion-resistant material that is commonly used in

various industries, including food and beverage containers.

Collapsible. (of an object) able to be folded into a small space.

Glass water bottles. Made from natural, sustainable sources, unlike plastic, which is

made of chemicals, most of which are harmful. In a nutshell.

Hinder. Create difficulties for (someone or something), resulting in delay or

obstruction.

Extensively. In a way that covers or affects a large area.

Polyethylene terephthalate. Is also abbreviated as PET / PETE is mainly used to

manufacture the packaging material for food products such as fruit and drinks

containers.

Quantifiable. refers to something that can be measured or expressed in numerical

terms.

Encompassing. including or covering a wide range of things or ideas. It suggests that

something is comprehensive or all-encompassing, incorporating various aspects or

elements within its scope.

Nuanced. Having or characterized by subtle and often appealingly complex qualities,

aspects, or distinctions.

Intricate. Very complicated or detailed.

Unveiling. the presentation or announcement of something in public for the first time.

Facets. A particular aspect or feature of something.

Distinctive. Characteristics of one person or thing, and so serving to distinguish it

from others.

Versatility. Ability to adapt or be adapted to many different functions or activities.

 20

Chapter 2
Presentation, Interpretation and Analysis of data

This chapter focuses on the presentation,interpretation and analysis of data

gathered in the investigation into the "Factors Influencing Student Preferences for

Hydration Container Materials among ABM Students at Buanoy National High

School." Through careful tabulations of the collected data, researchers aim to derive

valuable insights into the factors influencing student preferences. Each tabulation

serves as a means to understand the underlying factors shaping these preferences.

With a dedication to thoroughness and precision, the researchers navigate through this

domain of tabulated data, striving to untangle the intricate relationships and patterns

that define the research inquiry.

Part I. Respondent's Profile

Respondent's profile includes gender and age, which significant to the study

because it provides insights into the varying needs and preferences of different student

groups.

Table 3.
Respondent’s Profile
n = 103
Age Gender Number of Percentage
Respondents (%)

15 - 17 Male 13 13

Female 28 27

18 - 20 Male 26 25

Female 36 35

Total 103 100

 21

In Table 3,it shows the respondents' profiles are categorized by age groups

(15-17 and 18-20) and gender (male and female). According to Lugloyo (2022),

demographic factors such as age and gender can define consumer tastes and influence

consumer preferences and choices in purchasing products. In the table, the age group

of 15-17 has 13 males and 28 females, representing 13 and 27 percent of the total

sample size, respectively. For the age group 18-20, there are 26 males and 36 females,

making up 25 and 35 percent of the total sample sizes, respectively.

Part II. Factors Influences in Selecting a Hydration Container Material.

This includes the table 4 to table 7,this is significant to the study as it

identifies the factors guiding students' choices for hydration container materials such

as material preferences, brand reputation, and cost evaluation.

Legend

3.26-4.00 Most Important

2.51-3.25 Important

1.76-2.50 Moderately Important

1.0-1.75 Not Important

Material Preferences.

This factor is significant because it aims to determine students' material

preferences for hydration container, providing insights into their environmental

consciousness and sustainability awareness.

 22

Table 4.
Material Preferences
n = 103

∑ x̄ x̄ Verbal
Description
Aspects (Weighted (Mean)
Points)
Aesthetic Appeal 276 2.68 Important
Texture and feel 283 2.75 Important
Durability 293 2.84 Important
consideration
Average Weighted 284 2.76 Important
Mean

In Table 4, all aspects of material preferences were categorized as important.

The aspect ‘ Aesthetic Appeal ’ has a total of 276 weighted points with a mean of 2.68.

The aspect ‘Texture and Feel’ has a total of 283 weighted points with a mean of 2.75.

Lastly, the aspect ‘Brand reputation’ has a total of 293 weighted points with a mean of

2.84. Overall, the total weighted points of all aspects in material preferences is 284,

with a mean of 2.76, categorizing as 'Important' in students' preferences for hydration

container materials. This results is supported by the findings of the current study of

Bahrainizad and Rajabi (2018), which also demonstrate the material of the product as

an important factors in influencing buyers' choices when purchasing a product.

 23

Brand Reputation.

This factor is significant to the study because it determines the brand

preferences, indicating the role of brand perception and reputation in students'

decision-making processes.

Table 5.
Brand Reputation
n =103
Aspect ∑ x̄ x̄ Verbal
Description
(Weighted (Mean)
Points)

Trustworthiness and 303 2.94 Important

reliability of the brand

Previous positive experiences 335 3.25 Important

with the brand

Previous positive experiences 324 3.15 Important

with the brand

Average Weighted Mean 321 3.11 Important

In Table 5, all aspects of brand reputation were categorized as important. The

aspect ‘Trustworthiness and reliability of the brand’ has a total of 303 weighted points

with a mean of 2.94. The aspect ‘Previous positive experiences with the brand’ has a

total of 335 weighted points with a mean of 3.25. Lastly, the aspect ‘previous positive

experiences with the brand’ has a total of 324 weighted points with a mean of 3.15.

Overall, the total weighted points of all aspects in brand reputation is 321, with a

mean of 3.11, categorizing as 'Important' in students' preferences for hydration

container materials. This result is supported by the findings of the current study of

Mazurek (2019), that shows the customer loyalty has been influenced by the
 24

reputation of a brand. When customers have favorable interactions with a brand, they

tend to develop loyalty, resulting in continued purchases and lasting support.

Cost Evaluation.

This factor is significant because it analyzes cost preferences, helping to

understand how economic factors influence students' decision-making processes.

Table 6.
Cost Evaluation
n = 103

∑ x̄ x̄ Verbal
Description
Aspect (Weighted (Mean)
Points)

Initial Cost (Price) 331 3.21 Important

Affordability (Budget) 340 3.30 Most

Important

Perceived Value of Money 329 3.19 Important

Average Weighted Mean 333 3.23 Important

In Table 6, it shows that including both Initial cost (price) and perceived

value for money, was categorized as 'Important,' with 331 and 329 total weighted

points and a mean of 3.21 and 3.19, respectively. Meanwhile, the affordability (budget)

aspect was categorized as 'most important,' with 340 total weighted points and a mean

of 3.30. Overall, the total weighted points of all aspects in cost evaluation is 333, with

a mean of 3.23, categorizing as 'Important' in students' preferences for hydration

container materials. This result is supported by the study of Zhao et al. (2021), which

also demonstrate the pricing of the product as one of the vital and essential elements

influencing consumer buying behavior.

 25

Table 7.

Summary table for the factors influences in selecting a hydration container

materials

Factors Verbal Description

x̄

(Mean)

Material Preferences 2.76 Important

Brand Reputation 3.11 Important

Cost Evaluation 3.23 Important

Total Weighted Mean 3.03 Important

In Table 7, it presents the summary of all the factors, showing that all the

factors are important for students when choosing a hydration container materials.

Furthermore, the overall weighed mean of all the factors is 3.03, indicating it's

important in shaping students' preferences for hydration containers.

Part III. The Primary Material Preferences in Choosing a Hydration Container

Material.

This includes the table 8 to 11 ,this is significant because it explores specific

material preferences, such as aesthetic appeal, texture and feel, and durability

consideration, offering insights into the key factors influencing students' decisions,

crucial for understanding the consumption patterns and guiding interventions towards

sustainable practices.

Legend

3.26-4.00 Most Important

2.51-3.25 Important
1.76-2.50 Moderately Important
1.0-1.75 Not Important
 26

Aesthetic Appeal.

This factor is significant because it examines the aesthetic preferences,

revealing the importance of visual attractiveness in students' choices and its potential

impact on their behavior.

Table 8.
Aesthetic Appeal
n = 103

∑ x̄ x̄ Verbal
Description
Aspect (Weighted (Mean)
Points)

Color and Design 309 3 Important

preferences

Visual attractiveness and 330 3.20 Important

style

Personalized or Trendy 303 2.94 Important

appearance

Average Weighted Mean 314 3.05 Important

In Table 8, all aspects of aesthetic appeal were categorized as important. The

aspect 'Color and design preferences' has a total of 309 weighted points with a mean

of 3. The aspect 'Visual attractiveness and style' has a total of 330 weighted points

with a mean of 3.20. Lastly, the aspect 'Personalized or trendy appearance' has a total

of 303 weighted points with a mean of 2.94. Overall, the total weighted points of all

aspects in Aesthetic appeal is 314, with a mean of 3.05, categorizing as 'Important' in

students' preferences for hydration container materials. This result is supported by the

findings of the current study of Yang Li and Jie Li (2022), that shows the aesthetic

design has a positive influence on buyers' purchase intention.

 27

Texture and Feel.

This factor is significant because it determines the preferences regarding

texture and feel, highlighting the aspects that influence students' satisfaction and

comfort with hydration containers.

Table 9.

Texture and Feel

n = 103

∑ x̄ x̄ Verbal
Description
Aspect
(Weighted (Mean)
Points)

Smoothness or Roughness of 291 2.83 Important

the surface

Comfort in holding and 324 3.15 Important

gripping

Comfort in holding and 329 3.19 Important

gripping

Average Weighted Mean 315 3.06 Important

In Table 9, all aspects of texture and feel were categorized as important. The

aspect 'Smoothness or Roughness of the surface' has a total of 291 weighted points

with a mean of 2.83. The aspect 'Comfort in holding and gripping' has a total of 324

weighted points with a mean of 3.15. Lastly, the aspect 'Comfort in holding and

gripping' has a total of 329 weighted points with a mean of 3.19. Overall, the total

weighted points of all aspects in texture and feel is 315, with a mean of 3.06,

categorizing as 'Important' in students' preferences for hydration container

 28

materials.This finding aligns with the conclusions drawn from the study of Naseem et

al. (2021), shows that regardless of other qualities a product may possess, such as

functionality, the perceived quality of its materials significantly influences consumers'

decisions to purchase it.

Durability Considerations.

This factor is significant because it assesses the factors influencing durability

choices, shedding light on students' practical considerations and long-term usage

intentions.

Table 10.

Brand Reputation
n = 103

∑ x̄ x̄ Verbal
Description
Aspect (Weighted (Mean)
Points)

Strength and Resistance to 313 3.04 Important

Damage

Longevity 317 3.08 Important

Ease of Maintenance 324 3.15 Important

Average Weighted Mean 318 3.09 Important

In Table 10, all aspects of durability consideration were categorized as

important. The aspect 'Strength and Resistance to Damage' has a total of 313 weighted

points with a mean of 3.04. The aspect 'Longevity’ has a total of 317 weighted points

with a mean of 3.08. Lastly, the aspect ‘Ease of Maintenance’ has a total of 324
 29

weighted points with a mean of 3.15. Overall, the total weighted points of all aspects

in durability consideration is 318, with a mean of 3.09, categorizing as 'Important' in

students' preferences for hydration container materials. This result is supported by the

findings of the current study of Mesa et al. (2022), which also demonstrate the

durability of the product/goods as a design strategy that can foster consumer

attachment to the product and incentive them to extend the lifespan of their products

through proper care.

Table 11

Summary table for the primary material preferences in choosing a hydration

container material.

n = 103
Factors x̄ Verbal
Description
(Mean)

Aesthetic Appeal 3.05 Important

Texture and feel 3.06 Important

Durability Consideration 3.09 Important

Total Weighted Mean 3.07 Important

In Table 11, it presents the summary of all the factors, showing all the factors

as important for students primary material preferences when choosing a hydration

container materials. Furthermore, the overall weighted mean of all the factors is 3.07,

indicating the importance in shaping students' preferences for hydration container

materials.
 30

Table 12
Significant relationship when analyzed by Gender

Gender Pearson r P value

Male 0.96 0.0001

&
Female

In Table 12, the researchers examined the relationship between gender (male

and female) and student preferences for hydration container materials. The reported

correlation coefficient of 0.96 indicates a strong positive linear relationship between

gender and student preferences. This suggests that there is a high degree of

association between gender and the choices students make when selecting hydration

containers. Additionally, the very low p-value of 0.0001 provides strong evidence to

reject the null hypothesis and support the alternative hypothesis, indicating that

gender has a significant influence on student preferences for hydration containers.

Table 13
Significant relationships when analyzed by Age

Age Pearson r P value

15-17 0.95 0.0001

&
18-20

In Table 13, the researchers examined the relationship between age groups

(15-17 and 18-20) and student preferences for hydration container materials. The

correlation coefficient of 0.95 suggests a strong positive linear relationship between

age groups and student preferences. This indicates that there is a high degree of

association between age groups and the choices students make in terms of hydration
 31

container preferences. The very low p-value of 0.0001 further supports the rejection

of the null hypothesis and the acceptance of the alternative hypothesis, indicating that

age groups have a significant influence on student preferences for hydration

containers.

In conclusion, the analysis of Tables 12 and 13 reveals that both gender and

age significantly influence Grade-12 students' preferences for hydration container

materials at Buanoy National High School. These findings emphasize the importance

of considering gender and age when designing and marketing hydration containers to

meet the specific preferences of students.

 32

Chapter 3
Summary, Findings, and Conclusion

Summary

This chapter provides a comprehensive summary of the study conducted to

determine the factors influencing Grade-12 students' preferences for hydration

container materials at Buanoy National High School. The study focused on the

respondents' profile, including gender and age, and the factors influencing their

choices when selecting a hydration container material. These factors included material

preferences, brand reputation, and cost evaluation. Additionally, the study explored

the primary material preferences among students when choosing hydration containers

in terms of aesthetic appeal, texture and feel, and durability consideration. The study

also aimed to identify any significant relationship between the respondents' profile

and students' preferences in choosing a hydration container material.

Findings

The findings of this study reveal an important insights among Grade-12

students’ in academic track preferences for hydration container materials.

Respondents' Profile: The study reveals that both gender and age

significantly influence Grade-12 students' preferences for hydration container

materials. Furthermore, a significant relationship was found between the respondents'

profile and students' preferences in choosing a hydration container material, indicating

that demographic factors play a crucial role in shaping students' preferences.

 33

Factors Influencing Material Selection: Material preferences, brand

reputation, and cost evaluation are found to be crucial factors influencing students'

choices when selecting a hydration container material. Students have specific

preferences for materials based on factors such as aesthetics, durability, and

environmental sustainability.

Primary Material Preferences: Aesthetic appeal, texture and feel, and

durability consideration emerge as the primary material preferences among students

when choosing hydration containers. Students are drawn to containers that have

visually pleasing designs, offer a comfortable tactile experience, and are associated

with reputable brands.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights into the factors

influencing Grade-12 students' in academic track preferences for hydration container

materials at Buanoy National High School. The findings highlight the significant

influence of both gender and age on student preferences and the importance of

considering these factors when designing hydration containers. Material preferences,

brand reputation, and cost evaluation, along with aesthetic appeal, texture and feel,

and durability consideration, were identified as crucial factors guiding students'

decisions. The significant relationship between the respondents' profile and students'

preferences underscores the importance of understanding the demographic

characteristics of the target population when designing and marketing hydration

containers. These findings have practical implications for stakeholders involved in the

design and marketing of hydration containers, enabling them to better cater to the

preferences of Grade-12 students.

 34

Chapter 4

Recommendation

This chapter provides recommendations based on the findings of the study

regarding the factors influencing Grade-12 students' preferences for hydration

container materials. The recommendations aim to assist stakeholders involved in

designing and marketing hydration containers in effectively catering to the

preferences of Grade-12 students.

This chapter recommends the following:

1. Consider Consumer Preferences: Take into account the specific preferences and

needs of consumers when designing hydration containers. Conduct market research to

understand the aesthetic and functional preferences of the target consumer group.

Develop designs that cater to these preferences, such as color schemes, patterns, and

shapes, to create hydration containers that resonate with consumers and meet their

individual needs.

2. Age-Specific Appeal: Recognize that consumers span a wide age range and have

varying preferences. Offer a variety of designs and materials that appeal to different

age groups. Conduct market research or gather feedback from consumers to

understand the specific design elements and features that resonate with different age

groups. By providing options that cater to the preferences of different ages.

3. Sustainability and Value: Emphasize the importance of sustainability and value for

consumers when designing and marketing hydration containers. Consider using eco-

friendly materials and highlight the environmental benefits of choosing reusable

containers. Additionally, offer hydration containers at various price points to

 35

accommodate different budgets and highlight the value and quality of the products.

By aligning with consumers' concerns for the environment and their financial

considerations, stakeholders can appeal to their values and increase the likelihood of

adoption and satisfaction with the hydration containers.

4. Ongoing Research and Adaptation: It is recommended to establish a continuous

feedback loop with target consumer and regularly gather insights and feedback to

inform the design and marketing of hydration containers. Conducting ongoing

research, such as surveys, focus groups, or interviews, will help to understand any

evolving preferences, emerging trends, and changing needs of students. This research

can provide valuable insights into the factors influencing their choices and guide the

adaptation of hydration container designs, materials, and marketing strategies

accordingly.

By implementing these recommendations, stakeholders can better meet the

preferences and needs of Grade-12 students when designing and marketing hydration

containers. This will contribute to increased student satisfaction and engagement,

ultimately leading to higher adoption and usage of the containers.

 36

Reference List

What are Water Bottles Made of? | My Own Water. (2023).

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.myownwater.com/blog/what-is-a-water-
bottle-made-
of&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjK0pavlcWFAxWlzjgGHW_3CaAQFnoECAAQAw&usg=
AOvVaw0dpv8ImJpcAb8pzQAO8qua

MarketResearch.com. (n.d.).
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.marketresearch.com/Expert-Market-
Research-v4220/Global-Hydration-Containers-Forecast-
36321607/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwisoprXlcWFAxVlxTgGHXSpAMkQFnoECAMQ
Ag&usg=AOvVaw2JCgDzGjAjJCbVCapxcIQu

Hydration Containers Market | Expected to be the fastest growing industry 2032.

(2022) https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hydration-
containers-market-expected-fastest-
ajswf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjP0s7LlsWFAxUexTgGHcU7BZ8QFnoECAAQAw&u
sg=AOvVaw1WwAv15Dhn7yJwI-pC5WwH

Brookes, E. (2023, October 11). The Theory of planned Behavior: Behavioral

intention. Simply Psychology.
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.simplypsychology.org/theory-of-planned-
behavior.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjSqryfl8WFAxUK9zgGHdbFCqEQFnoECAcQ
Ag&usg=AOvVaw0NEBBUd2IOJgRtctHydmrg

Ruangkanjanases, A., You, J., Chien, S., Yin, M., Chen, S., & Chao, L. (2020).
Elucidating the effect of antecedents on consumers’ green purchase intention: an
extension of the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01433

Water conservation behavior: Exploring the role of social, psychological, and

behavioral determinants. (2022).
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/
S030147972201057X&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwj42uHQmMWFAxWO7TgGHfnRAtA
QFnoECAUQAg&usg=AOvVaw2s9HVSsiLUc2ZODaW_mP2_
 37

Mustafa, S., Hao, T., Jamil, K., Qiao, Y., & Nawaz, M. (2022). Role of Eco-Friendly
products in the revival of developing countries’ economies and achieving a
sustainable green economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955245

Hong, H. (2009). Scale development for measuring health consciousness: re-

conceptualization. ResearchGate.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255609883_
Scale_Development_for_Measuring_Health_Consciousness_Re-
conceptualization&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiUgf68m8WFAxXAXmwGHZu4A40QFno
ECAwQAg&usg=AOvVaw0YIh0A9zROmbUNNnavR8wA

Saefi et al. (2022).

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ejmste.com/download/theory-of-planned-
behavior-to-analyze-students-intentions-in-consuming-tap-water-
12976.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjSoZ6BnMWFAxWDbmwGHUzIAy4QFnoECAY
QAg&usg=AOvVaw11uRSdQI-GzTLzeu9VXEEw

Xu, Y., Du, J., Khan, M. a. S., Jin, S., Altaf, M., Anwar, F., & Sharif, I. (2022). Effects
of subjective norms and environmental mechanism on green purchase behavior: An
extended model of theory of planned Behavior. Frontiers in Environmental Science,
10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.779629

Fedi et al. (2021).

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350381479_
Intention_to_adopt_pro-
environmental_behaviors_among_university_students_of_hard_and_soft_sciences_th
e_case_of_drinking_by_reusable_bottles&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiulo34nMWFAxV-
9jgGHaciB6IQFnoECAkQAg&usg=AOvVaw0WBMzQ50v0NNy97qyjIzJp

Guo, M., Ling, T. C., Liang, W., Peng, J., Ren, R., & Chiu, C. (2021). Determinants of
intention to purchase bottled water based on business online strategy in China: The
role of perceived risk in the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health/International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010729
 38

Judge et al. (2019).

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330210387_
Using_the_theory_of_planned_behaviour_to_predict_intentions_to_purchase_sustain
able_housing&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiMnK2rncWFAxUVi2MGHe9aAcIQFnoECAQ
QAg&usg=AOvVaw1g27z_qjZUWLFtBJ1VKzCm

Musso, F., Colamatteo, A., Bravi, L., Pagnanelli, M. A., Murmura, F., & Sansone, M.
(2022). Analysis of factors affecting the purchase of private label products by
different age consumers. British Food Journal, 124(13), 619–636.
https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-03-2022-0256

Jain, and Sharma. (2012).

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/pravaha/article/vie
w/31871/25220&sa=U&=2ahUKEwjQkpf1n8WFAxWm2TgGHRO5AaAQFnoECA
EQAg&usg=AOvVaw2NeI3u7U7opxRMrX02IXfj

Madahi, A. and Sukati, I. (2012), “The effect of external factors on purchase intention
amongst young generation in Malaysia”, International Business Research, Vol. 5 No.
8, pp. 153-159, https://doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n8p153.

Karami et al. (2017).

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316530840_
Key_cultural_values_underlying_consumers%27_buying_behaviour_a_study_in_an_
Iranian_context&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiF6byMpMWFAxWNR2wGHdc8BKIQFnoE
CAkQAg&usg=AOvVaw3zcgiui5DAv6Y13PLEyDyq

B rai. (2017).
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/pravaha/article/vie
w/31871/25220&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwii1PmQpcWFAxVD8jgGHVmHCJoQFnoEC
AkQAg&usg=AOvVaw1ZQQRASk9y8xqSmZZDZiP3

Lugluyo. (2023).
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3
Farticle%3D6403%26context%3Detd&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjC-
b_lpcWFAxVoa2wGHeG0C2YQFnoECAEQAg&usg=AOvVaw3svNtAc71cLLgQiX
ECL3Ct
 39

Atwell, C. (2023). Assessment of factors that impact hydration status of professional.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi%3F
article%3D1010%26context%3Dhnhiuht&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiwn8XYpsWFAxVh
zDgGHWQkCZ0QFnoECAUQAg&usg=AOvVaw2pDpJUDc4GMZSHP139hize

Bahrainizad, M., & Rajabi, A. (2018). Consumers’ perception of usability of product

packaging and impulse buying. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 9(2), 262–282.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-04-2016-0030

Mesa, J., Quiroga, A., Jugend, D., & Agular, M. (2022). Linking product design and
durability: A review and research agenda.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363752996_Linking_product_design_and_d
urability_A_review_and_research_agenda

Zhao, H., Yao, X., Liu, Z., & Yang, Q. (2021). Impact of pricing and product
information on consumer buying behavior with customer satisfaction in a mediating
role. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720151

Li, Y., & Li, J. (2022). The influence of design aesthetics on consumers’ purchase
intention toward cultural and creative products: evidence from the Palace Museum in
China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939403

Naseem, S., Sarif, M, and Kumar, A. (2021). Modeling the relationship between
carbon emissions and environmental sustainability during COVID-19: a new evidence
from asymmetric ARDL cointegration approach. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 16208–
16226.https://doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01324-0

Sao Mai, D., & Tri Cuong, D. (2021). Relationships between Service Quality, Brand
Image, Customer Satisfaction, and Customer Loyalty.
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349869313_
Relationships_between_Service_Quality_Brand_Image_Customer_Satisfaction_and_
Customer_Loyalty&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiy9ofTvMWFAxUhS2wGHW9xB-
MQFnoECAkQAg&usg=AOvVaw0T8R8Jj9v5J3jUeimz6I8Y
 40

APENNDICES
 41

Appendix A

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Senior High School Department

Buanoy National High School
Buanoy Balamban Cebu

Feb. 27, 2024

The Researchers
Grade-12 ABM-B Students

Adviser/Subject Teachers
Grade 12 Teachers
Buanoy National High School

Dear Ma’am/Sir,

​ We the Grade 12- ABM- B Senior High School students here in Buanoy
National High School like to conduct a research study regarding our chosen topic
which is “Factors influencing student preferences for hydration container materials”
as required in this subject in Inquiries, Investigation, and Immersion. All the senior
high students who manage an online business are chosen as one of our respondents.
This investigation will last for 10-15 minutes. Your permission will be highly
appreciated for the success of this research study.
We rest assured that their responses will be kept confidential and follow our ethical
standards.

Respectfully,

The Researchers

Noted by: ​

WILLIAM L. CAYRON
SHS- Coordinator

Approved by:

CRISTOPHER C. PIODOS
Acting School Secondary Principal
 42

Appendix B
Questionnaire

Directions: Read carefully and check the corresponding boxes for your answer.
Select the rating that best reflects your preference for each aspect. (1) for Not
Important, (2) for Moderately Important, (3) for Important, and (4) for Most
Important.

Part I. Respondent’s profile

Gender: ☐ Male Age: ☐ 15-17
☐ Female ☐ 18-20
Part II. What factors influence students’ choices when selecting a hydration container
material in the context of sustainable living in terms of.
2.1. Material Preferences 1 2 3 4
How do material preferences influence your choice when selecting a hydration
container material in the context of sustainable living in terms of;

a. Aesthetic
Appeal

b. Weight

c. Brand
reputation

2.2. Brand Reputation 1 2 3 4

When considering hydration containers, how do you assess the importance of Brand
Reputation in terms of;

a.
Trustworthiness
and reliability
of the brand.

b. Previous
positive
experiences with
the brand.

c. Perception of
brand values and
image.
 43

2.3. Cost Evaluation 1 2 3 4

In the context of sustainable living, how would you rate the importance of cost
evaluation in influencing your choices when selecting a hydration container material in
terms of;

a. Initial cost
(Price)

b. Affordability
(Budget)

c. Perceived
value for money

Part III. What are the primary material preferences among students when choosing hydration
container materials in terms of
3.1. Aesthetic Appeal 1 2 3 4
How do you prioritize the aesthetic appeal when selecting a hydration container in
terms of;

a . Color and design preferences

b. Visual attractiveness and style

c. Personalized or trendy
appearance

3.2. Texture and feel 1 2 3 4

How does the texture and feel of a hydration container material impact your
choices in terms of;

a. Smoothness or roughness
of the surface

b. Comfort in holding and

gripping

c. Perception of material
quality

2.2. Durability Consideration 1 2 3 4

How significant are durability consideration in influencing your choices when

selecting a hydration container material in the context of sustainable living in terms
of;

a. Strength & resistance to

damage

b. Longevity

c. Ease of maintenance
 44

Appendix C
Computation

To determine the factors influencing students preferences for hydration

container materials. The weighted mean method was used.

Weights Range Scale Verbal Description

4 3.26-4.00 Most The highest level of importance,
Important indicating that the factor
strongly influences the
decision-making process.
3 2.51-3.25 Important The factor is crucial and
significantly influences the
decision-making process.
2 1.76-2.50 Moderate The factor has a moderate
ly influence on the decision-
Important making process.
1 1.0-1.75 Not The factor holds minimal
Important significance in the decision-
making process.

Part II. Factors Influences in Selecting a Hydration Container Material

Table 4.

Material preferences

n = 103

Aspects Weights ∑ x̄ x̄

1 2 3 4 (Weighted (Mean)
Points)

Aesthetic 11 30 43 19 276 2.68

Appeal

Texture and 11 26 44 22 283 2.75

feel

Durability 17 14 40 32 293 2.84

consideration

Average Weighted Mean 284 2.76

 45

Formula : x̄ =
(�∙�)
�

Where:

w= weights x̄ = weighted mean

x = scores/ points ∑ x̄ = weighted points

n = sample size

x̄ = (�∙�)
�
=
(1∙39)+(2∙70)+(3∙127)+(4∙73)
103
39+140+381+292 = 852/ 3
= 103
284
= 103
∑ x̄ = 284

x̄ =2.76

Therefore, the weighted points is 284 and the weighted mean is 2.84 for table 4.

Table 5.
Brand Reputation
n = 103
Aspect Weights ∑ x̄ x̄

1 2 3 4 (Weighted (Mean)
Points)

Trustworthiness 7 28 32 36 303 2.94

and reliability of
the brand

Previous 3 14 40 46 335 3.25

positive
experiences with
the brand

Perception of 7 13 41 42 324 3.15

brand values and
image

Average Weighted Mean 321 3.11

 46

Formula : x̄ =
(�∙�)
�

Where:

w= weights x̄ = weighted mean

x = scores/ points ∑ x̄ = weighted points

n = sample size

x̄ = (�∙�)
�
=
(1∙17)+(2∙55)+(3∙113)+(4∙124)
103
17+110+339+496 = 962/ 3
= 103
321
= 103
∑ x̄ = 321

x̄ = 3.11

Therefore, the weighted points is 321 and the weighted mean is 3.11 for table 5.

Table 6.
Cost Evaluation
n = 103

Weights ∑ x̄ x̄

Aspect (Weighted (Mean)

1 2 3 4 Points)

Initial Cost (Price) 4 18 33 48 331 3.21

Affordability 6 10 34 53 340 3.30

(Budget)

Perceived Value of 4 15 41 43 329 3.19

Money

Average Weighted Mean 333 3.23

 47

Formula : x̄ =
(�∙�)
�

Where:

w= weights x̄ = weighted mean

x = scores/ points ∑ x̄ = weighted points

n = sample size

x̄ = (�∙�)
�
=
(1∙14)+(2∙43)+(3∙108)+(4∙144)
103

14+86+324+576 = 1000/ 3
= 103
333
= 103
∑ x̄ = 333

x̄ = 3.23

Therefore, the weighted points is 333 and the weighted mean is 3.23 for table 6.
 48

Part III. The Primary Material Preferences in Choosing a Hydration Container

Material.

Table 8.
Aesthetic Appeal
n = 103
Weights ∑ x̄ x̄

Aspect (Weighted (Mean)

1 2 3 4 Points)

Color and Design 6 26 33 38 309 3

preferences

Visual attractiveness and 2 16 44 41 330 3.20

style

Personalized or Trendy 8 25 35 35 303 2.94

appearance

Average Weighted Mean 314 3.05

Formula : x̄ =
(�∙�)
�

Where:

w= weights x̄ = weighted mean

x = scores/ points ∑ x̄ = weighted points

n = sample size
 49

x̄ = (�∙�)
�
=
(1∙16)+(2∙67)+(3∙112)+(4∙114)
103
= 942/ 3
16+134+336+456
=
103
314
∑ x̄ = 314
= 103

x̄ = 3.05

Therefore, the weighted points is 314 and the weighted mean is 3.05 for table 8.

Table 9.
Texture and Feel
n = 103

Weights ∑ x̄ x̄

Aspect (Weighted (Mean)

Points)
1 2 3 4

Smoothness or 17 9 30 47 291 2.83

Roughness of the
surface

Comfort in 6 23 31 43 324 3.15

holding and
gripping

Comfort in 7 16 35 45 329 3.19

holding and
gripping

Average Weighted Mean 315 3.06

Formula : x̄ =
(�∙�)
�

Where:

w= weights x̄ = weighted mean

x = scores/ points ∑ x̄ = weighted points

n = sample size
 50

x̄ = (�∙�)
�
=
(1∙16)+(2∙64)+(3∙116)+(4∙113)
103
= 944/ 3
16+128+348+452
=
103
315
∑ x̄ = 315
= 103

x̄ = 3.06

Therefore, the weighted points is 315 and the weighted mean is 3.06 for table 9.

Table 10.
Durability Consideration
n = 103

Weights ∑ x̄ x̄

Aspect (Weighted ((Mean)

1 2 3 4
Points)

Strength and 17 9 30 47 313 3.04

Resistance to
Damage

Longevity 6 23 31 43 317 3.08

Ease of Maintenance 7 16 35 45 324 3.15

Average Weighted Mean 318 3.09

Formula : x̄ =
(�∙�)
�

Where:

w= weights x̄ = weighted mean

x = scores/ points ∑ x̄ = weighted points

n = sample size
 51

x̄ = (�∙�)
�
=
(1∙30)+(2∙48)+(3∙96)+(4∙135)
103
= 954/ 3
30+96+288+540
=
103
318
∑ x̄ = 318
= 103

x̄ = 3.09

Therefore, the weighted points is 318 and the weighted mean is 3.09 for table 10.

To determine the significant relation between the respondents’ profile and

factors influences in selecting hydration container material, as well the primary

material preferences in choosing a hydration container material. The pearson r

analysis was used.

Table 12
Significant relationship when analyzed by Gender
Gender Pearson r P value

Male
& 0.96 0.0001
Female

(�−x̄)(y−�̄)
Formula: r =
(�−x̄)2 (y−�̄)2

Where:

x̄ = Mean of x variable

y = Mean of y variable
 52

x y (� − x̄) (y − �̄) (� − x̄) (� − x̄)2 (y − �̄)2 (� − x̄)2

(Gender) (y − �̄) (y − �̄)2

39 3.03 -13 -0.02 0.26 169 0.0004 0.07

64 3.07 12 0.02 0.24 144 0.0004 0.06

∑ x̄ =52 ∑�̄ = ∑ = 0.25 ∑= 0.07

3.05

(�−x̄)(y−�̄) 0.25
r= = 0.07
(�−x̄)2 (y−�̄)2

0.25
=
0.26

r = 0.96

Table 13
Significant relationships when analyzed by Age
Age Pearsons r P value

15-17
& 0.95 0.0001
18-20

(�−x̄)(y−�̄)
Formula: r =
(�−x̄)2 (y−�̄)2

Where:

x̄ = Mean of x variable

y = Mean of y variable
 53

X y (� − x̄) (y − �̄) (� − x̄) (� − x̄)2 (y − �̄)2 (� − x̄)2

(Age) (y − �̄) (y − �̄)2

41 3.03 -11 -0.02 0.22 121 0.0004 0.05

62 3.07 10 0.02 0.02 100 0.0004 0.04

∑ x̄ ∑�̄ = ∑ = 0.21 ∑= 0.05

=52 3.05

(�−x̄)(y−�̄) 0.21
r= =
0.05
(�−x̄)2 (y−�̄)2

0.21
=
0.22

r = 0.95
 54

Curriculum Vitae

Name: Barbecho, Dyjel Babe, C.

Age: 17
Height: 5'7
Weight:40
Religion: Roman atholic
Sex: Female

Name: Aligato, Lorenz Kieth, P.

Age:18
Height: 5'4
Weight: 69
Religion: Roman Catholic
Sex: Male

Name: Lloyd S. Galleros

Age: 18
Height: 5'10
Weight:69
Religion: Roman Catholic
Sex: Male
 55

Name: Segovia, Adrian

Age: 17
Height: 5'3
Weight: 45
Religion: Roman Catholic
Sex: Male

Name: Cristoria, Jeannette Paula, R.

Age: 18
Height: 4'11
Weight: 36
Religion: Roman Catholic
Sex: Female

Name: Deguma, Angel May

Age: 17
Height: 4'5
Weight: 35
Religion: Roman Catholic
Sex: Female