Tier 3 Comprehensive Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) Guide
Tier 3 Comprehensive Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) Guide
TIER 3 COMPREHENSIVE
FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIOR
ASSESSMENT (FBA)
GUIDE
CENTER ON PBIS
January 2022
This document was supported from funds provided by the Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports cooperative
grant supported by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) and Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE)
of the U.S. Department of Education (H326S180001). Dr. Renee Bradley serves as the project officer. The views expressed herein
do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the U.S. Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S.
Department of Education of any product, commodity, or enterprise mentioned in this document is intended or should be inferred.
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Comparison of Levels of Functional Behavior Assessment/Behavior
Intervention/Support Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Teaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Team Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Team Roles and Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Team Processes for Reaching Consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Student Involvement as Team Member . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Identifying, Defining, and Prioritizing Behaviors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Progress Monitoring/Data Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Functional Behavior Assessment and Hypothesis Development . . . . . . . . . 16
Indirect Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Direct Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Building a Functional Behavior Assessment Based Behavior Intervention/
Support Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Task Analyzing Behavior Intervention/Supports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Coaching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29
Training the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Active Coaching Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Teacher Reflection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Providing Feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Measuring Fidelity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Data-based Decision Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Embedded Hyperlinks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Introduction
The purpose of this practice guide is to help teams success in and out of school. Comprehensive
conduct a comprehensive functional behavior approaches provide all the essential steps and
assessment, develop a function-linked behavior materials needed for implementation including
intervention/support plan, and make data-based progress monitoring tools, implementation fidelity,
decisions. Functional behavior assessments help and active coaching to support teachers implementing
teams to identify the relation of targeted serious and behavior intervention/support plans.
intense (i.e., challenging) behavior to the environmental
This guide includes key practices to be included in
events that occur before and after the behavior is
a comprehensive approach and is intended to help
performed. The information gathered is organized into
educators have a systematic process that can be
a statement, typically called a hypothesis, which is the
applied consistently throughout schools and districts
team’s roadmap to developing a behavior intervention/
while still retaining flexibility to meet the specific needs
support plan. FBA/BIPs have a wealth of research
of each individual student. This guide was developed
showing effectiveness in schools (e.g., Anderson &
as a part of a series of Tier 3 guides that focus on
Long, 2002; Dwyer et al., 2011; Iovannone et al.,
systems and practices for supporting students with
2009) and is considered the “gold standard” and the
intensive needs. If you are interested in the companion
core for individualized behavior interventions/supports.
guides, please review:
Tier 3 Comprehensive Functional Behavior
• Tier 3 School-level Systems Guide1
Assessments provides individualized, customized
• Tier 3 Student-level Systems Guide2
support to one student that meets his/her unique
needs. It is a team-based approach and is intended • Tier 3 Brief Functional Behavior
for students who have serious, chronic challenging Assessment (FBA) Guide3
behaviors that significantly interfere with student • Wraparound and Person-Centered Planning4
Teaming
Before starting to conduct a comprehensive FBA, • Family, teacher(s), para-educators, the student
a student-focused team is formed. The team is • Other people who provide supports (speech
responsible for implementing each step of the FBA pathologist, bus driver, guidance counselors,
process. Team formation should consider the following: etc.
be those who know the individual student and have a • This member describes policies that may
vested interest in the student’s success. The number of impact the FBA and assists with brainstorming
team members will vary depending upon the student how to adapt policies or processes to enhance
the success of a behavior intervention.
behaviors and others impacted by the behavior. It
is suggested that educators consider having team Team Roles and Responsibilities
members who represent the following areas of
Clear delineation of roles and responsibilities of each
expertise/knowledge.
team member can ensure that comprehensive FBA
• Members with knowledge of the student team meetings run more efficiently, and activities
identified are carried out as intended. Prior to
• These individuals provide the primary
information about the student and the relation determining the roles and responsibilities of team
of the environment to the challenging behavior member, it may be beneficial to decide if there will
be an extended team and a core team. An extended
• Interact with the student on a regular basis
team would consist of multiple team members who
would provide information related to the targeted • Agrees to be trained by the coach to
student and challenging behavior, provide support to implement the plan
the teacher/implementor, review data, and participate • Participates in active coaching including
in broad decisions. The core team would primarily indicating the type of coaching that best
include the coach and the teacher or educator who will matches his/her context and gives reflections
on implementation.
implement the behavior intervention/support plan.
• Collects progress monitoring data
Examples of team-member roles and responsibilities are:
• Recorder
• Coach
• This role may be helpful with larger teams
• Keeps team discussion focused on data and
facts • Records discussions and decisions made
• Helps team come to consensus • This role may be helpful in larger teams
• Supports the teacher to implement the • Keeps the team within time limits designated
intervention/support plan (see Active Coaching for specific topics
Process)
• Delivers prompts to team when time is about
• Guides team to review data and make next- to end or asks team where to take time from if
step decisions team wishes to continue discussion
7
Figure 1. Example FBA/BIP Team Meeting Agenda
Today’s Date: 3/3/20 Time: 2:00 Location: Library Coach: Joan Minute
Meeting: Taker: Tom
Next Meeting: Date: 3/10/20 Time: 2:00 Location: TBD Coach: Joan Minute
Taker: Cho
Today’s Agenda Items Next Meeting Agenda Items Potential Problems Raised
1. Come to consensus on team 1. Review data from
member representation (5 min.) progress monitoring tool
2. Come to consensus on student’s 2. Review FBA information
behaviors to be decreased and 3. Come to consensus on
increased (15 min.) hypothesis
3. Define behaviors (10 min.) 4. Begin to select
4. Prioritize behaviors for FBA (5 interventions
min.)
5. Set up progress monitoring tool
(15 min.)
6. Schedule date for meeting 2 (2
min.)
7. Assign/review tasks (FBA
interviews, observations, data) (5
min.)
Minutes
5. Assign tasks •
Comprehensive FBA/BIP teams consist of diverse Teams are encouraged to include the student as a team
individuals who may have shared goals and outcomes member in the comprehensive approach. After all, the
but may disagree on the actions to take to achieve student has the most information about the conditions
them. Engaging in meetings to discuss challenging related to his/her behaviors. Students in upper
behaviors of a student can often result in discussions elementary and higher grades typically are considered
in which emotions are strong and opinions set. There for inclusion; however, younger students who can talk
are several team processes that can help move a team, about their behaviors (e.g., when they occur, what
even one that has struggled working collaboratively, they get after the behavior occurs) and communicate
to come to consensus. Consensus, as applied to the preferences about intervention strategies could also be
comprehensive process, means that all team members included.
can live with the decision and follow through with the
When including a student in the team, discuss how
activities that follow. Some methods that can assist
the student will participate. Students may not be
a team to come to consensus as well as effectively
comfortable attending a meeting with adult team
communicate include:
members while challenging behaviors are being
• Establishing meeting behavior norms discussed. Instead, the team can consider how to
• Encouraging all members to engage in discussion get input from the student that will help the team
better understand the challenging behavior from the
• Refraining from shooting down or criticizing
student’s perspective and may increase the student
statements
willingness to participate in the intervention/support
• Brainstorming plan developed.
• Nominal Group Technique 7
• Polling or voting
• Rank ordering
• Identify behaviors of concern to be decreased and Note: Behaviors maintained by the same function are
define in measurable and observable terms: The described by a term called response class (Catania,
definition should describe the motor behaviors or 1998). Function-linked BIPs developed for the priority
other observable and measurable characteristics behavior may have a pivotal effect on other behaviors
we would observe the student performing when sharing the same function. It is recommended that
engaged in the behavior. if a student has multiple behaviors of concern, team
members should examine whether the intervention/
• Example 1: Hitting-uses hands to slap peers on support developed for one specific target behavior
their bodies at the intensity in which it leaves a appears to change the other behaviors, either
red mark while screaming “stop it”. positively or negatively (Willems, 1974).
• Example 2: Withdrawing— pulls sweatshirt • Identify behaviors to be increased and define in
overhead, puts head down, and remains silent measurable and observable terms: The behavior
when asked questions. selected for increasing should be an appropriate
behavior that replaces the challenging behavior
• Example 3: Self-injury—silently scratching the
prioritized for the FBA. Examples could be
inside of arms with fingernails or sharp object with
communicative behaviors that express needs (e.g.,
an intensity that scrapes skin or draws blood.
asking for breaks, access to objects/activities/
• Come to consensus on the behavior to focus attention) or alternate skills that enable students
on first for the FBA: Although it is possible to to be successful (e.g., being academically engaged,
address multiple behaviors of concern within raising hand to ask for assistance, problem-solving
a comprehensive process, it will require more novel problems, using self-calming strategies,
time. Each unique defined behavior would need appropriately joining in social activities). Definitions
should again include the motor behaviors one Table 2. Behaviors Identified, Defined
would observe the student perform. For instance, and Prioritized for Student Named Royal
academic engagement might be defined as “eyes/
face turned toward speaker, interacting with task Traget Behavior Definition (clear and observable)
Table 2 is an example of a tool that can be used by Cursing Verbally states curse words toward
others using a loud volume (can be
the coach and team to record behaviors identified, heard throughout classroom).
defined and prioritized. This tool is an adaptation from
a manualized, research supported FBA/BIP process BE HAVI ORS TO I NC RE AS E
titled Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (Dunlap et al., 2019; Raising hand Putting hand straight up and quietly
waiting for an adult to respond prior
Iovannone et al., 2009); however, it can be used
to stating her need.
with any FBA/BIP model. The example summarizes
the behaviors identified and defined by the team. Using an inside voice Stating her needs by using an inside
voice volume.
Behaviors in bold font are the prioritized ones that the
team agreed to prioritize.
Academic Interacting with materials in a way
engagement that gets the task completed and/or
head/eyes oriented toward speaker,
raising his hand to ask for help,
answer a question, or volunteer a
response to teacher-led questions,
allowing his neighbors to work
bold=prioritized behaviors
Progress Monitoring/Data Collection by teachers for daily data collection. DBRs combine
features of direct observation and rating scales. A
Once the team has specific behaviors prioritized, a
common example of a DBR is the Daily Report Card
progress monitoring system that will be used throughout
used in Check-in/Check-out, a Tier 2 support (Crone
the comprehensive process (i.e., baseline through post-
et al., 2010). The Neag School of Education at the
implementation of behavior intervention/support plan) will
University of Connecticut has a website with examples
be identified that will provide data on student performance
of DBRs for individualized intervention/supports.9
of the challenging and replacement behaviors. These data
Individualized DBRs give the teacher a way to record
will let the team know if their intervention/support plan
behavior occurrence by circling a rating that represents
is successful. The progress monitoring system will also
a measurement dimension (e.g., frequency, percentage,
let teams identify target goals of behavior performance
duration). This recording is customized to get the data
for the student to obtain. The following questions can
that are needed. For example, a teacher can select to
be answered with a daily progress monitoring system:
record data across specific activities, subjects, time
• Is the challenging behavior one that should be periods or the entire day. Multiple teachers can use
targeted for the FBA and intervention/support?
the DBR to record behaviors in their settings, making
• How effective is the behavior intervention/support it easy to evaluate where behavior is improving,
plan on reducing the challenging behavior?
remaining flat, or worsening. DBRs can be made more
• Is the student increasing performance of the replacement efficient by setting them up in online platforms (e.g.
behaviors after implementation of the behavior plan? Excel Google Document) and giving a teacher a link to
record data daily.
When selecting a progress monitoring system, consider
feasibility of use by the teacher. There are many ways Figure 2 is an example of a DBR for Royal. The tool
to progress monitor including direct observations to is called the Individualized Behavior Rating Scale
record frequency, duration, or latency. This is the gold Tool (IBRST) and has been shown to be both reliable
standard for individual student data collection; however, and valid (see Barnes et al., 2021; Iovannone et al.,
the training that would be required for teachers to gain 2014). The IBRST can be a core-team meeting activity
competency in this method may exceed resources. It (between the coach and the team member who
can be challenging for teachers to provide instruction will be responsible for collecting data). The IBRST
and respond to behaviors while also recording behaviors uses a 5-point Likert Scale with a 5 indicating a lot
in real time. In these cases, the team may consider other of the behavior and a 1 indicating absence or no
ways to gather data that are research supported and behavior. For each prioritized behavior, the coach and
feasible for daily use by teachers. teacher work together to determine the scale and
measurement dimensions.
In recent years, Direct Behavior Ratings (DBR;
Chafouleas et al., 2002) have been increasingly used
Dates
Rating
Behavior
<9 min 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Tantrums-
Reading
6-9 min 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3-5 min 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
1-2 min 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
0-1 min 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
80-100% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Engagement
60-79% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Reading
40-59% 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
20-39% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
0-19% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
>60% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Communicate-
45-60% 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Reading
30-44% 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
15-29% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
0-14% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
KEY:
Problem Behavior Tantrum: Definition Shouts out negative comments (e.g., “no”, “this is
KEY
stupid”), then kicks objects (his desk, nearby chairs of peers), throws objects off her desk
outward toward others, screams “I won’t do this. You can’t make me” while standing up.
Problem Behavior: Tantrum
Time/Routine: All day Specific Time/Routine: Independent work in reading.
Rate your perception of how long Royal’s tantrums lasted overall during the independent work
Definition: Shouts out negative comments (e.g., “no”, “this is stupid”), then kicks objects (his desk, nearby chairs
routine.
of peers),
5= throws objects off
Exceptionally herday
bad desk outward
>9 min. toward others, screams “I won’t do this. You can’t make me” while
standing4up.
= Typical bad day 6-9 min.
3 = So-so day 3-5 min.
2 = Good day
Time/Routine: All day Specific 1-2 min.
Time/Routine: Independent work in reading.
1 = Fantastic day 0-1 min.
Replacement/Alternate
Positive Behavioral Desired(PBIS)
Interventions & Supports Behavior;
Academic Engagement. Definition Interacting with 14
materials in a way that gets the task completed and/or head/eyes oriented toward speaker,
JANUARY 2022
Rate your perception of how long Royal’s tantrums lasted overall during the independent work routine.
Definition: Interacting with materials in a way that gets the task completed and/or head/eyes oriented toward
speaker, raising hand to ask for help, answer a question, volunteer a response; allowing his neighbors to work
Rate your perceptions about the percentage of time Royal spent performing engaged behaviors during the routine.
Replacement/Alternate Desired Behavior: Appropriately communicating his need for a break or for attention
Definition: Asking for a break from a task and/or attention in the form of adult or peer assistance.
Rate your perception of the percentage of opportunities Royal communicated her need for a break or attention.
questions into a Google document or Qualtrics Survey becomes more reinforcing than completing academic
and provide each informant with a link to complete activities. Not all students have setting events, but
it as a survey or questionnaire. This will result in when they do, it is beneficial for the team to identify
graphs that show which information was confirmed by them, discuss the pattern that exists linking the
multiple people. setting event with challenging behavior occurrence
and including them in the hypothesis when the link is
Interviews are also helpful in identifying potential
established. For more information on setting events,
setting events. Setting events are antecedents;
see Iovannone et al., 2017.
however, they often have a time delay in triggering
challenging behavior and instead, set up the chain Direct Methods
of the immediate trigger, behavior, and responses of Observations. Information from interviews can help
others. Setting events have the following two features: determine in which environments the student should
(a) they are present sometimes but not all the time; be directly observed. Observations in the following
and (b) when they are present, there is a pattern of environments should be considered:
impacting the target challenging behavior. Common
• Environments in which there is a high likelihood of
examples of setting events include fatigue related to
the challenging behavior occurring
getting to bed late, having a fight with a boyfriend
before school starts, or feeling ill. Setting events • Environments in which there is a greater chance of
observing the most frequent triggers (e.g., demand
impact behavior performance because they temporarily
to do non-preferred activity, proximity to specific
change the value of the reinforcement or consequence peers, etc.)
(Michael, 1982). A simple illustration of this happening
• Environments in which there is a low or nonexistent
is when a student, who is typically actively engaged in
likelihood of challenging behavior occurring
school, decides to join a sports team or be in a play.
These new activities require the student to spend • Observing conditions in which there is no
challenging behavior can give information on
hours each evening practicing or rehearsing, resulting
potential interventions
in less sleep. The student starts to be less engaged or
even “withdraw” (e.g., fall asleep at their desk) because • Understanding the differences in the conditions
can help the team understand why triggers in
sleep deprivation sets the occasion and avoiding work
other environments set off challenging behavior
After completing all assessments, draft hypothesis Behaviors can serve multiple functions. Below are a
statements are developed. Helpful templates for few examples:
developing hypotheses include the competing behavior
• A student’s challenging behavior can get the
pathway (see Tier 3 Student-level Systems Guide13 student escape while also getting attention. For
brief) and the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR) FBA example, Zoey screams when she is asked to stop a
Assessment Organization Table. During comprehensive preferred activity and transition to a less preferred
activity. After screaming, the teacher gives several
FBAs, the team will discuss the draft hypothesis, clarify
verbal redirects, followed by several verbal
any ambiguous or contradictory information, and
reprimands. This is followed by removal of Zoey
come to consensus on the final statement. Hypothesis to a time-out area within the classroom if Zoey
statements for challenging behaviors typically include continues to scream. While Zoey is in time-out, the
the following information from the FBA assessment: teacher sits with her and continues to give verbal
redirects. The FBA indicated that Zoey’s screaming
• The primary antecedents (setting events, if present, behavior effectively delayed the transition to the
and immediate triggers) non-preferred activity and secondarily, while Zoey
was delaying the transition, she received one-on-
• The behavior (challenging behavior)
one attention from the teacher.
• The function (based on the responses following the
• A student’s challenging behavior can serve to
challenging behavior and the triggers)
escape in one condition and to obtain in another
The function is the outcome that the student gets condition. For instance, Jonah’s cursing behavior
during non-preferred writing tasks that are
after performing the challenging behavior. Functions of
independent gets him out of the task when the
behavior are divided into two categories.
teacher sends him to the office. During free
• Escape/avoid/delay/terminate an activity, an time or social interaction times, both preferred
object, presence/attention of other people (peers activities, Jonah’s cursing behavior serves to get
and/or adults), and/or sensory conditions him attention from peers as evidenced by peers
laughing and making comments to him.
• Obtain/access an activity, an object, presence/ Table 3 shows an example of the PTR FBA Assessment
attention of other people (peers and/or adults), Organization Table and the final hypothesis for Royal.
and/or sensory conditions
This specific method of organizing FBA data has been
used in typical school settings within two randomized
controlled trials (Harvey et al., 2021; Iovannone et Also note that a setting event (recurring ear infection)
al., 2009). Note that this example includes both the was identified as a slow trigger. In Royal’s case, the
challenging behavior and a replacement behavior team endorsed that when Royal has an ear infection,
hypothesis. It is helpful to have a replacement behavior the tantrum behavior is more likely to occur and will
hypothesis. One way to do this is to describe the escalate to hitting more quickly. Ear infections occur
antecedents and the functions that were included in about once a month and more often during warmer
the challenging behavior hypotheses but exchange the weather. Thus, ear infections met the standards for a
challenging behavior for the replacement behavior. setting event (e.g., event does not happen every day
The replacement behavior hypothesis helps teams and the target behavior is impacted when the setting
understand that the new behavior will be the only way event is in place).
the student can continue to obtain the same function
as the challenging behavior.
Hypothesis
the student the function. At a minimum, teams and contextual fit. When developing the specific
will want to develop an intervention/support procedures of each strategy, it will be important to
that describes how to redirect the student to
describe the behaviors that the teacher or implementor
use his/her replacement behavior instead of
will perform when implementing the strategy.
the challenging behavior to get the function.
In Jeannie’s case, the teacher can immediately
Table 4 contains examples of questions common across
redirect her to request a break after the first sign of
most strategies that can be used with the teacher to
off-task behavior.
describe when, what, and how the strategies will be
Task Analyzing Behavior Intervention/ implemented. These questions can be answered by the
Supports teacher in building the implementation procedures for
Working with the teacher to develop a lesson plan or selected interventions/supports. In addition, many of
step-by-step procedure that details the steps of each the questions can be asked of the student as well to
strategy will enhance the likelihood that the strategies ensure that the intervention/support procedures will
will be accurately implemented. Furthermore, asking be acceptable.
a teacher specific questions about how he/she would
like to implement the strategy increases its feasibility
When will the Asking the teacher to identify when For a choice-making, prevention strategy, the teacher can be asked
strategy be within a routine or activity in which “When will be the best time to present the choice to the student? Right
implemented? the challenging behavior occurs. This before you give the direction for the writing assignment or right after you give
question should be aligned with the it?”
FBA/hypothesis.
For a replacement behavior strategy, the teacher can be asked “When will
be the best time to prompt the student to use his/her replacement behavior?
Immediately after the writing demand or immediately after seeing a first sign
of the off-task behavior?”
How will the Describing the exact procedures or steps For an intervention that needs a prompt given to the student, the
strategy be of the intervention. This could include teacher can be asked where he or she will be in relation to the student
implemented? specific physical/verbal behaviors the when delivering the prompt-e.g., “Do you want to walk over to the student
teacher or other implementors will when giving the prompt or do you want the student to come to your desk?”
perform.
Teachers can be asked how they want to deliver a part of the
intervention. For example, a teacher can be asked “Do you prefer to
prompt the student using words or would you prefer using a visual or a
gesture?”
Teachers can be asked what words they prefer to use when the
intervention includes verbal communication between the teacher and
student. For example, “What do you want to say when you deliver the
prompt? Do you want to say ‘remember to ask for a break by placing a break
card at the corner of your desk’ or is there some other way you’d like to say
that?”
What will be Identifying and describing the materials Teachers can be asked what might be made or purchased for a strategy.
needed to or other needs to be addressed to For example, a teacher can be asked the following questions about a
implement the make the behavior strategy doable. break card that will be used for a replacement behavior strategy: “How
strategy? This can include specific materials to be do you want the break card to look? Do you want the word break written on
developed or purchased (e.g., visuals, it? Do you want a picture of a break? How large do you want it? How many
timers, reinforcers, self-monitoring do you want? Does it need to be laminated? What color should it be?”
forms, etc.), or readiness preparation
Teachers can be asked what they want included on a visual support (e.g.,
(e.g., training the student, getting
schedule, checklist, self-monitoring form) and how it should look. For
consents from parents of peers who may
example, in developing a self-monitoring sheet, the teacher can be asked
be involved in the strategy, identifying
“Where do you want the goal to be placed on the sheet? At the top or right
school policies that may need to be
before the monitoring table?” Note: Consider including the student in this
checked prior to implementation, etc.).
development, particularly if the student will be using the support.
Note: Having team members volunteer to
Teachers can be asked about pre-requisite procedural or policy steps
assist the teacher in preparing materials
necessary before the strategy can be implemented. For example, if a
often ensures that the strategy will be
peer-modeling or mediation strategy (for increasing social interactions)
ready for implementation in a timely
is used, a teacher can be asked “Will the peers who will be part of the
manner. Action plans stating who will
strategy need parent permission to participate in the strategy? If yes, is there
be responsible for different assignments
a consent form available or do we need to prepare one? Does anyone else
can be beneficial for keeping everyone on
have to approve this beyond the principal?”
target.
Hypothesis: When Royal is (a) assigned independent tasks to do at his desk in reading and math that are lengthy
or require writing, or (b) required to transition from preferred activities (recess, art, music) to non-preferred
activities (independent reading and math), or (c) having a recurring ear infection, he will tantrum. As a result, he
delays/avoids the independent work activities or transitions from preferred to non-preferred by being given
redirects, reprimands, assistance and being sent to time-out or the behavior specialist.
Intervention
Description and Steps
Strategy
PREVENT Intervention/Supports
Setting Event To address the days that Royal has his recurring ear infections, a communication system will be set up to let the
communication school know when Royal is experiencing an ear infection. This will be established with the parent and with Royal.
and changing When Royal is experiencing an ear infection, he will be offered choices related to demands.
demands
Setting Event Strategy Steps
(addressing
recurring ear 1. A communication system will be set up with the parent to know whether Royal is experiencing an ear infection.
This will be via a standardized text message sent by the teacher to the parent at 7 a.m. each morning asking the
infection).
parent to respond with a Y (yes) or N (no) to the question: Does Royal have an ear infection today?
a. If the parent does not respond to the text, the teacher will ask Royal upon arrival to school whether he has
an ear infection that day.
2. If Royal is not experiencing an ear infection, his day will proceed normally.
3. If Royal is experiencing an ear infection, upon arrival at school, the teacher will meet Royal’s bus, walk with him
to a quiet place in the library, and ask him to describe his discomfort, using a visual pain rating scale in which a 1
represents very little pain and a 10 represents a lot of pain. (“Hi Royal, I heard that you might have an ear infection
today. I’m sorry. I know it must hurt. Tell me how much it hurts by circling the face and number that best tells us how
you are feeling.”). (Note: Face pain rating scales can be obtained from Wong-Baker https://wongbakerfaces.org).
4. If the pain is mild (4 or less), the teacher will say, “You’re having some pain but it isn’t too bad. Do you think you can
come to class now and get ready for morning meeting? If it starts hurting more, you can let me know.”
5. If the pain is moderate (6-8), the teacher will give Royal a choice by saying, “It looks as if you’re having pain t
oday. Do you want to rest in the nurse’s office for 15 minutes first before coming to class or do you want to come to
class now?”
a. If Royal chooses to rest for 15 minutes, an adult will check on Royal after 15 minutes and repeat the choice
if necessary.
6. If the pain is severe (10), the teacher will ask the nurse to check Royal’s temperature (to make sure he does not
have a fever). If he has a fever, the parent will be called. If he does not have a fever, step 5 will be repeated.
Intervention
Description and Steps
Strategy
Providing To address the non-preferred independent task demands that involve writing, a choice intervention will be
Choices implemented. Initially, a choice will be offered to Royal during language arts independent work times that involve
writing paragraphs that are lengthy (more than 5 minutes). This strategy can be gradually expanded to address other
events that trigger tantrum behaviors. Choice categories that will be offered include within-task (pen or pencil, color
of pencil, color or shape of eraser, color of paper) and where (at his desk, at the round table near the window).
Intervention
Description and Steps
Strategy
TEACH Interventions
Replacement Royal will be taught to ask for a break by using a break card to briefly escape from independent writing tasks instead
behavior: of using tantrum behaviors. The break card will be kept on Royal’s desk during independent writing tasks.
Request a Break
Requesting a Break Strategy Steps
1. During the first week of implementing the break card strategy, the teacher will remind Royal after presenting the
choices (from prevention intervention) that he can use the break card when he needs to “chill” for one or two
minutes. The teacher will review with Royal how to use the break card. The teacher will say, “Remember, when
you’re writing and you think that you need to chill, you can use the break card to stop working for 2 minutes.
Just hold the break card in your hand and raise that hand so I can see it and know you’re taking a break. I’ll set
the timer for 2 minutes, and you can just sit back and chill. When the timer goes off, you can go back to working
or you can ask to take another break. If you do go back to work when the timer goes off, you will earn minutes
for free time at the end of the writing task.” This can be gradually faded after Royal starts using the break card
consistently or stays engaged during independent writing tasks.
2. The first few days of implementation, the teacher will be vigilant by noting if Royal is showing some early signs
that he is getting ready to tantrum or note that he is not engaging in the independent writing task. When this
situation occurs, the teacher will immediately go over to Royal and prompt him to use his break card by pointing
to the break card while saying “It looks like you need to chill. Let me know if you need 2 minutes by raising your
break card.”
Replacement Royal will be supported to engage in on-task behaviors during independent writing time. On task behaviors include
behavior: Be on the following:
task
• Interacting with task materials in a way that gets the task completed
• Returning to work within 5 seconds after a 2-minute break has ended
• Raising his hand to ask for help on his task
Writing time typically lasts 30 minutes. For each 3 minutes of on-task activity, Royal will earn 1 minute of free time
(total = 10 minutes) that can be used to end the writing task early and do a preferred activity instead. Each minute
earned will be represented by a token that will be placed in a clear jar. The teacher will monitor the jar and when
20 minutes of writing time has ended, the teacher will go over to Royal. Together they will count the tokens, add up
the minutes represented, and Royal will decide if he wants to use his free time until the end of the writing period
(contingent upon time earned) or if he wants to save it for later in the day. This strategy can be faded by increasing
the amount of engaged time to earn one-minute of free time.
Intervention
Description and Steps
Strategy
REINFORCE Interventions/Supports
Reinforce use Each time Royal holds his break card up, the teacher will provide him with a 2-minute break.
of replacement
Reinforce Use of Replacement Behavior Strategy Steps
behavior (ask
for break) 1. Immediately after Royal puts up his break card, the teacher will go over to Royal and say “Thank you for letting
us know you need a break. Take 2 minutes to chill.”
2. The teacher will set the timer for 2 minutes.
3. When the timer goes off, the teacher will prompt Royal to go back to his task if he has not done so
independently by pointing to his task assignment or by asking him, “Royal, are you ready to go back to work or do
you need another break? Let me know.”
Reinforce on- The teacher will provide 1 minute of free time for each 3 minutes out of 30 minutes of writing time that Royal is
task behavior on-task.
Change The teacher will redirect Royal to use his replacement behavior immediately after he engages in pre-cursor
responses to behaviors to tantrums (e.g., mild pushing away materials on his desk, ceasing working, beginning mild protest). This
challenging will remind Royal that the way to get a break is to use his replacement behavior.
behavior
Change Responses to Challenging Behavior Strategy Steps
1. Immediately after the teacher observes Royal performing a precursor behavior, the teacher will go over to Royal
and calmly point to his break card.
2. If Royal does not immediately hold up his break card, the teacher will deliver a verbal prompt-“It looks like you
need a break. Show me how you ask for a break”).
3. If Royal does not use his break card after the verbal prompt, the teacher will give a verbal direction by holding up
the break card while saying, “Take a 2-minute break”.
4. The teacher will set the timer for 2 minutes.
5. When the timer goes off, the teacher will prompt Royal to go back to his task if he has not done so
independently by pointing to his task assignment or by asking him, “Royal, are you ready to go back to work or do
you need another break? Let me know.”
After a behavior intervention/support plan is When preparing to train the teacher to implement
developed, the team will want to consider how to the behavior intervention/support plan, it is helpful
make sure that the teacher is able to implement the to identify the observable adult behaviors described
plan as intended and provide on-going assistance to in the plan and develop a visual checklist that can be
adapt the plan as necessary and use data to make used as both a training tool and a fidelity measure. The
next-step decisions. Although this guide is strongly checklist is prepared by identifying the interventions
suggesting that the teacher play an active role in steps one would be able to observe an adult perform
designing the strategy steps to be implemented in the for each strategy on the behavior intervention/support
classroom with the student, teams should not assume plan and listing them. Figure 3 is a sample training/
that the task analysis is sufficient for ensuring teacher fidelity checklist developed for Royal’s teacher. More
competence and comfort with the strategies. information on how to use the form as a fidelity
measure and calculate a fidelity score will be described
Coaching includes two components:
in the section Measuring Fidelity.
• Training the plan
PREVENT
Setting Event Strategy
1. Sent text message to parent or asked Royal upon arrival to Y / N / NA
school about presence of ear infection
2. Presented Royal with visual pain rating scale on days ear Y / N / NA
infection present
3. Provided options to Royal contingent upon pain rating Y / N / NA
(mild, moderate, severe)
Provide Choices
1. Immediately after writing demand presented, walked over Y / N / NA
to Royal and offered a choice (within or where).
2. Immediately after Royal made choice, honored choice and Y / N / NA
delivered positive comment.
TEACH
Request a break
1. After offering choice, reviewed how to use break card with Y / N / NA
Royal.
2. Immediately after observing pre-cursor behaviors (off-task, Y / N / NA
pushing materials), prompted Royal to use break card by
pointing and making factual statement.
Be on-task
1. At beginning of day, reviewed on-task behaviors with Y / N / NA
Royal and earning of tokens for free time.
2. Set smart phone for 3 minutes and placed token into clear Y / N / NA
jar if Royal observed being on task.
3. If Royal got off-task, prompted Royal to be on-task by Y / N / NA
pointing to clear jar.
4. Counted tokens in jar with Royal ten minutes prior to end Y / N / NA
of writing time.
REINFORCE
Reinforce use of break card
1. Immediately after Royal used break card, released Royal to Y / N / NA
2-minute break and provided positive comment.
2. Set timer for 2-minutes. Y / N / NA
3. Prompted Royal to return to task when 2-minute timer went Y / N / NA
off if Royal did not do so independently.
4. Placed token in clear jar if Royal returned to task prior to 2- Y / N / NA
minutes or independently when timer sounded.
Reinforce on-task behavior
1. Placed token in clear jar after every 3 minutes of on-task Y / N / NA
behavior
2. Provided positive gesture (thumbs up) Y / N / NA
3. After counting tokens earned, asked Royal when he wanted Y / N / NA
to do free time.
Changing responses to challenging behavior
1. Immediately redirected Royal to use break card upon Y / N / NA
observing precursor to challenging behavior.
2. Proceeded through prompting hierarchy as necessary Y / N / NA
(gesture, verbal, model).
The person responsible for coaching the teacher can schedule a 30-minute block of time without students present
for this activity. The following table outlines the typical sequence of steps used to train the teacher.
Explanation A discussion or description of the steps for The coach says to the teacher, “For the setting event strategy, we
each strategy is reviewed with the teacher. agreed to communicate with Royal’s mother by sending a text message
to ask if Royal is experiencing an ear infection each day, then meet Royal
upon arrival and on days she has an ear infection, have her rate her level
of pain. Then depending upon her rating, we will present choices. Does
that still sound okay?”
Modeling Demonstrate to the teacher how to The coach says to the teacher, “Let’s practice. First, I’ll be you and
implement an activity. This can be you be Royal.” The coach then demonstrates texting the parent,
accomplished through role-playing with presenting the pain rating scale, and presenting choices based on
the coach taking the teacher role and the the rating made by the teacher (role playing Royal).
teacher taking the student role.
Rehearsal The teacher performs the strategy steps The coach says to the teacher, “Let’s switch. I’ll be Royal. Practice
with the coach or another educator taking going through the setting event strategy steps with me.”
the role of the student.
Teacher The teacher reflects on his/her/their The coach asks the teacher, “How comfortable are you with the setting
Reflection performance and identifies areas of event strategy? What was easy? What was difficult?”
competence and need.
Feedback The coach provides the teacher with The coach responds to teacher reflection and observation of the
positive reinforcement for steps rehearsal by saying “I think you did each step exactly as written. I
implemented correctly and suggestions for agree that you were very comfortable presenting the visual pain rating
steps that were challenging for the teacher scale. And although you expressed some discomfort with presenting
to perform. the options based on the pain rating, I do think it will become less
challenging to remember as you begin to use the strategy each day. Is
there something that we can do to help you remember the different
options? One idea is to write the options on the back of the visual pain
rating. That way, you just turn it over after Royal tells you her rating, and
the options are there. Or is there something else that would
work better?”
After training the plan and the teacher indicating routine/time identified. The coach will schedule a time
comfort with it, the next step is to train other to observe the teacher implement the plan and provide
individuals. This can include other educators who will active (ongoing coaching). Active coaching is an
be implementing the plan as well as the student. It is iterative cycle of observation, reflection, and feedback.
important to prepare the student before beginning Although it is ideal if the coach can be present the first
to implement the strategies so that the student day the teacher implements the plan, it may not always
understands what, when, and how teacher actions will be feasible for that to happen. If the coach will not
be changing in the upcoming days. Training the student be present the first day the plan is implemented, the
can follow some of the same steps as training the coach will determine how to check in with the teacher
teacher including (a) explaining the plan, (b) modeling to make sure that everything went well. This can be via
the plan, and (c) getting student input/reflection on text, email, or phone call.
the plan. Training the student also gives the teacher
If feasible, active coaching can occur at least once a
a chance to have the student buy-in to the plan as it
week. Observations are scheduled during times the
is a prime opportunity to deliver reinforcement to the
intervention will be implemented and will work for
student. For example, during the modeling of the plan
the teacher. Most observations are on-site; however,
with Royal, she can begin to earn tokens to be placed
they may also be performed via virtual methods or
in the clear jar, which she can then use to take a break
by having the teacher record a video and uploading
in class that day or the next day.
it to a secure website for coach review. Prior to the
When preparing to train the student, the coach will first coaching session, the coach can review how the
ask the teacher if he/she prefers for the coach or teacher wants the observations to occur. The coach
the teacher to train the student. It is best if both uses the Training/Fidelity Checklist while observing
the coach and the teacher are together during the to measure implementation fidelity. Table 7 describes
training regardless of who is taking the lead. Training the various options that can be used when training
the student should be scheduled for a block of time in the teacher in the plan (2nd column) and during active
which no other students are present. coaching (3rd column).
Strategy Description Training The Plan Example Implementing The Plan Example
Modeling Demonstrate how to implement an The coach role-plays the coping strategy The coach demonstrates how to use the
activity with the teacher coping strategy with the student during a
1:1 activity
Prompting Use of a method for providing a reminder The coach makes the “thumbs up” sign to The intervention specifies that a student
cue to the teacher as to what to do next. indicate to the teacher that he correctly should have access to a small toy for
Prompting methods for implementation role-played using the student’s activity 2 minutes after completing several
of the plan should be agreed upon schedule. requests. The coach uses a gesture
between the teacher and coach. prompt by pointing to the clock on the
Prompting can be verbal, gestural, or wall to indicate that time has elapsed
visual methods. You can also use these
strategies to give feedback. The teacher is prompting a student to
use a communication card. She starts to
hand it to the student. The coach says,
“Guide Jenna to pick up the card.”
Observe Observe the teacher implementing the The teacher and the para-educator The teacher initiates using an activity
and provide activity and provide ongoing feedback role-play teaching the student to use schedule with a student during lunch.
feedback and suggestions as the coach watches. a break card to ask for escape. The The coach praises her for pairing her
The feedback can be verbal, visual, or teacher forgets to provide a prompt to verbal with gestural prompts.
gestural. the aide (student) to use the break card
at the time indicated in the intervention/ After lunch the teacher transitions to
Note: This method is used if the teacher support plan. The coach says “remember desk work but forgets to review the
identifies this as the method to use. to prompt the student to use the break schedule with the student. The coach
card as soon as you present the writing gently verbalizes to the teacher to
assignment.” show the schedule, which she does
immediately.
Observe and The coach observes the activity without The teacher role-plays the complete Several peers have been taught to
note interacting with the student or teacher. sequence of the intervention/support facilitate interactions with Ella during
Feedback is provided at the end of the plan with the para-educator. The coach recess. The coach stands off to the side
activity. waits until the sequence is finished and of the swings, where they are playing,
then provides feedback. and watches the interaction. At the end
Note: This method is used if the teacher is of the activity, the teacher and the coach
in agreement and has the time to meet with meet and review the notes.
the coach after the observation.
Scheduled The coach does not observe the The coach and teacher developed the The teacher and coach agree to run a
virtual teacher or classroom. Instead, the coach intervention/support plan but ran out of peer tutoring session during math. The
support schedules communication the teacher time to practice the plan. The teacher teacher emails the coach the day before
before implementation intervention (e.g., wants to implement the plan the next day confirming the steps to be used. After
setup, anticipated problems) and after the and not wait until the coach can come the session, the teacher emails the coach
session (e.g., questions, troubleshooting). back out to train the plan. The coach and and asks about what to do if the peer
teacher agree to a virtual meeting via tutor is also struggling with the academic
Note: This method may be best utilized Zoom to practice the plan prior to the material.
when fading active coaching. teacher implementing it the next day.
They schedule a virtual meeting for later
in the day during the teacher’s planning
time to talk about the plan. The coach
asks the teacher to complete a reflection
form for their conversation.
Over the past week, the strategies and parts of the behavior intervention/support plan
that I think I implemented well are:
Providing choices. It has been working really well, and it is easy to do.
Over the past week, the most difficult parts of the strategies and behavior
intervention/support plan to implement were:
Remembering to notice Royal doing those mild behaviors and prompting her to ask for a
break. I try to remember but sometimes I get so busy, I don’t catch the behaviors in time.
Overall, in the past week, the extent that I believe I implemented the behavior
intervention/support plan as intended is (circle one):
0 1 2 3
Not at all Minimally Mostly Fully
Overall, in the past week, the extent that I believe the behavior intervention/support plan
had a positive impact on the student’s behavior is: (circle one):
0 1 2 3
No effect Minimal effect Some effect Significant effect
Alternatively, coaches can directly ask teachers reflective questions during the scheduled feedback sessions.
Providing Feedback
When giving feedback, coaches will want to make sure that teachers view it as a positive activity, helping them
make collaborative decisions on next steps. The table below provides tips for giving feedback to teachers after
observing implementation of the behavior intervention/support plan.
Providing Feedback
When giving feedback, coaches will want to make 8 below provides tips for giving feedback to teachers
sure that teachers view it as a positive activity, helping after observing implementation of the behavior
them make collaborative decisions on next steps. Table intervention/support plan.
The person responsible for coaching the teacher can schedule a 30-minute block of time without students present for this
activity. The following table outlines the typical sequence of steps used to provide performance feedback to the teacher.
Begin with one Initiate the discussion with a statement “You did a great job prompting Royal by pointing to the jar that holds
or more positive that describes something the teacher did her tokens when she got off task for a moment. That prompt was subtle
statements well. It is fine to use general statements enough that I don’t think anyone else even noticed but it really helped
such as, “You did a great job today” as long Royal get back on task.”
as specific examples are given.
Ask for positive Either before or after identifying something “In your view, what do you think is going well? Either overall or just in the
reflection. positive, ask the teacher what he or she time I watched today?”
thinks went well. If the teacher focuses
Note: The “I agree that you presented the choices of the materials Royal would use
on how well the student is doing, try to
Reflection Form to do her writing task today was perfect! She seems to respond well to
prompt the teacher to identify something
can be used as the choices, and I like the calm yet warm way you presented them to
about their own implementation that was
part of this step her.”
positive.
Ask for Ask the teacher what he/she thought was “You said you are having challenges remembering to prompt Royal to use
reflection challenging, difficult, or less than perfect her break card when you noticed pre-cursor behaviors such as when she
on areas for when implementing the intervention. This gets off-task and pushes her materials away. I did see you do it a couple
improvement is a great entry into corrective feedback, as of times, and when you did prompt her, even if it was delayed, it seemed
teachers will either identify something that to remind her to use her break card or, at least one time, get back on
Note: The
was not implemented correctly or identify task without getting into more intensive behaviors.”.
Reflection Form
something else that may direct coach
can be used as
feedback.
part of this step.
Provide specific Identify exactly what occurred incorrectly “The strategy that we developed has you providing the prompt
corrective and, when appropriate, why immediately after you observe Royal in some mild off-task behaviors.
feedback. How do you think this is going overall?” (Teacher indicates that it is
hard to do the prompting right away with all the other students in
class needing support). “Right, I noticed a couple of times that other
students needed your attention when Royal got off-task. There is a
lot going on, so it is hard to stay on top of this. Royal seems to really
respond well to your prompts so I’m thinking that we might want to
figure out how you might do the strategy when you have so many
students needing you at one time.”
Help the Use collaborative problem-solving to “Maybe we can come up with a way to make it easier to notice Royal
teacher identify improve performance. Begin by asking the getting off-task. What might help to make it easier for you to notice
strategies to teacher for ideas. Build upon what the Royal or scan the room when you are working with another student?” (If
improve teacher suggests. If the teacher cannot the teacher comes up with an idea). “That is a great idea. We might
come up with strategies, provide options have another student signal you when Royal begins to be off-task and
and ask the teacher to select the option move her materials around”. If the teacher does not come up with an
that would work best for them. idea—“Here are a couple of thoughts. We could train one or two peers
to assist by giving you a cue/signal when Royal gets off-task and you are
with another student. Or we can set a schedule for how often you will
scan the room to look at Royal, even when you’re working with another
student. For example, we could make sure that you’re reminded to scan
the room once a minute or some other interval? Do you think one of
those ideas will work? If so, which one do you prefer?”
Build fluency Don’t overwhelm the teacher with “You just identified five things that you could work on. There are
slowly by corrective feedback. Identify one or at probably always things we can improve but let’s pick just one or two
working on most two things to work on at a time. things. On your reflection form, you indicated that remembering to
one or two prompt Royal to use her break card is challenging. How about working
components at on that first”
a time.
End with Feedback should conclude with another “We spent a lot of time talking about how to remember to prompt Royal
positive positive observation to use her break card at the right times and that is important. I think it
feedback is important though that we also recognize how much went right. You
know, I really liked how you counted the tokens with Royal at the end of
writing time and gave her praise. She beamed when you did that! I think
she appreciated that even more than the earned break time.”
Measuring Fidelity
Measuring implementation fidelity can occur during Active coaching support continues until agreed
the active coaching sessions. Using a form such as upon goals are met. These could be based upon a
the Training/Fidelity Checklist to indicate whether student meeting behavior improvement criterion
strategy steps were implemented allows one to or when it is determined that a student no longer
calculate an implementation fidelity score and can needs individualized behavior interventions. It is
be used, as described in the previous section, for recommended that active coaching occur a minimum
providing performance feedback. Fidelity can also be of once a week initially, and as behaviors improve and
self-assessed by the teacher. The Training/Fidelity the teacher expresses confidence in implementing
Checklist can serve as a visual prompt to the teacher strategies, active coaching can gradually be decreased.
by reminding him/her of the steps needed to be Regardless, it is helpful to schedule regular progress-
performed for each strategy. Calculation of the fidelity monitoring meetings with the teacher and other team
score is accomplished by dividing the number of “yes” members to review the data and make next-step
checks by the sum of all “yes” and “no” checks and decisions.
multiplying by 100. This will provide the percentage of
steps accurately implemented by the teacher.
• Remember, even if the plan is resulting in • Alliance. The relationship between the coach
behavior improvement, plans are never abruptly and teacher can be measured to determine
discontinued. Gradual fading of plan features whether higher alliance leads to higher
can occur or shaping of behavioral goals (e.g., implementation fidelity. See Johnson et al.,
increasing criteria) might be next-step decisions. 2016 and Johnson et al., 2018 for further
information about teacher-coach alliance.
• If the team determines individualized supports
are no longer necessary, ensure that there is a Figure 5 is an example of a structured process for
continuum of behavioral supports that will be
facilitating a progress-monitoring meeting along with
provided to the student. For example, some
options for next-step decisions based on data.
students may be provided with a Tier 2 support
for three weeks prior to providing primarily Tier 1
supports only.
Summary
This guide described considerations for school-
based teams to implement a comprehensive FBA/
BIP process. The guide describes activities teams can
take to come to consensus on decisions throughout
the process. It highlights methods for enhancing
teacher buy-in to implementing interventions and
provides guidance for coaches to be effective and yield
improved outcomes for students with the most intense
behavioral needs.
References
Anderson, C. M., & Long, E. S. (2002). Use of a structured Dwyer, K., Rozewski, D., & Simonsen, B. (2011). A
descriptive assessment methodology to identify variables comparison of function-based replacement behaviors
affecting problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior for escape-motivated students. Journal of Emotional
Analysis, 35(n), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1901/ and Behavioral Disorders, 20(N), 115-125. https://doi.
jaba.2002.35-137. org/10.1177/1063426610387432.
Barnes, S., Iovannone, R., Blair, K. S., Crosland, K., & Peshak- Harvey, H. Dunlap, G., & McKay, K. (2019) Primary and
George, H. (2020). An evaluation of the prevent-teach- secondary effects of prevent-teach-reinforce for young
reinforce model within a multi-tiered intervention system. children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(2),
Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419844315
and Youth, 64(2), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/104598
Iovannone, R., Anderson, C. A., & Scott, T. (2017).
8X.2019.1688228.
Understanding setting events: What they are and how to
Catania, A.C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, identify them. Beyond Behavior, 26, 105-112. https://doi.
NJ: Prentice Hall. org/10.1177/1074295617729795.
Chafouleas, S. M., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & McDougal, J. (2002). Iovannone, R., Greenbaum, P., Wang, W. Kincaid, D.,
Good, bad, or in-between: How does the daily behavior & Dunlap, G. (2014). Inter-rater agreement of the
report card rate? Psychology in the schools, 39, 157-169. individualized behavior rating scale tool (IBRS-T). Effective
Assessment for Intervention, 39(4), 195-207. https://doi.
Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H. (2010).
org/10.1177/1534508413488414.
Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior
education program. Guilford Press. Scott, T. M., Alter, P. J., Rosenberg, M., & Borgmeier,
C. (2010). Decision-making in secondary and tertiary
Dunlap, G., Iovannone, R., Kincaid, D., Wilson, K.,
interventions of school-wide systems of positive behavior
Christiansen, K., & Strain, P. (2019). Prevent-Teach-Reinforce:
support. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(4), 513-535.
A school-based model of individualized positive behavior
support 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Embedded Hyperlinks
1. http://www.pbis.org/resource/ 10. https://www.doe.virginia.gov/support/student_
tier-3-school-level-systems-guide conduct/fba_interview_forms.pdf
8. https://www.pbis.org/resource/pbis-forum-in-brief-tips
9. https://dbr.education.uconn.edu/