0% found this document useful (0 votes)
528 views38 pages

COGS Analysis

The document discusses orthognathic surgery and facial analysis. It covers topics like cephalometric analysis landmarks and measurements, different facial types, and how orthognathic surgery can correct dentofacial deformities. Cephalometric analysis considers both hard and soft tissue landmarks and values. Different vertical and horizontal measurements are also discussed.

Uploaded by

Mugdha Francis
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
528 views38 pages

COGS Analysis

The document discusses orthognathic surgery and facial analysis. It covers topics like cephalometric analysis landmarks and measurements, different facial types, and how orthognathic surgery can correct dentofacial deformities. Cephalometric analysis considers both hard and soft tissue landmarks and values. Different vertical and horizontal measurements are also discussed.

Uploaded by

Mugdha Francis
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

Dr.K.

George Varghese
Consultant Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeon
Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Tiruvalla
1
Why this topic ?

2
Science and art of diagnosis,
treatment planning, and execution
of treatment to correct dentofacial
deformities (musculoskeletal, dento-
osseous and soft tissue)

3
Skeletal ,Dental, Soft tisse

4
5
Middle third: lower third- 5:6
Tr- trichion
G-glabella
Sn-subnasale
Me’ -soft tissue menton

The lower third can bedivided into


an upper third (from Sn to
stomion superius [Sts]) and a lower
two-thirds (from stomion inferius
[Sti] to Me’).
6
Mesocephalic /Brachycephalic/ Dolicocephalic

7
“Rule of fifth”

8
Trichion
 Upper third

Glabella

 Middle third

Subnasale

 Lower third
Menton

9
 Aid to clinical assessment- not a sole
diagnostic tool
 It should be critically weighed against
clinical finding and the individual needs
of the patient.

“The aesthetic desires of the patient should


be given the priority”
10
Cephalometric analyses are primarily
designed ( in Orthodontics) to evaluate
the position of the teeth with the
existing skeletal pattern. In patients
undergoing orthognathic surgery,
usually facial bones as well as teeth
positions are altered

11
Cephalometric Land mararks

 Hard tissue land marks


 Soft tissue land marks

Cephalometric values

 Hard tissue values


 Soft tissue values

12
-7 degree from SN intersecting at N
- Measurements made either parallel or perpendicular
to HP
13
1. Cranial base

2. Horizontal measurements- Skeletal

3. Vertical measurements- Skeletal & Dental

4. Maxilla and Mandible

5. Dental measurements

14
Landmarks considered- Ar, PTM , N
Ar- N - Length of cranial base- 50/52
Ar-PTN- Horizontal distance from post.maxilla-32/37
15
1) N A
(-2/0)

2) N B
(-6.9/5.3)

3) N Pg
(-6.5/4.3)

4) N-A-Pg
(2.6/3.9)
16
 Skeletal A. Anterior

B. Posterior

 Dental A. Anterior

B. Posterior

17
Skeletal
50.6/53.9 50/54.7

2 Anterior
Components
 N-ANS
 ANS-Gn
2 Posterior
Components 61.3/68.6
 N-PNS
 MP-HP Angle
24.2/23
18
Dental
2 Anterior
2 Posterior Components
Components  U1-NF
 U1-NF  L1-MP
 L1-MP

23/26.2 27.5/30.5

30.1/35.8
40.8/45

19
1)PNS- ANS
52.6/57.7
2)Ar- Go
46.8/52 3)Go Pg
122/123
4)Ar-Go-Gn

74.3/83.7
5)B- Pg
7.2/8.9

20
112/111

-0.4/1.1

7.1/6.2
1)HP-OP Angle
2) AB- OP
3)U1-NF Angle
4)L1-MP Angle
112/111
21
22
 Incomplete in providing details of
facial form
 Ceph analysis may be sometimes
misleading
 Soft tissue covering teeth and bone is
variable in thickness

23
Angle of convexity/
Anterior facial plane
Perpendicular
dropped
from glabella
to subnasion
and then
pogonion

24
Convex Straight Concave
Naso labial angle
 Normal range- 85 to105
degrees
 Acute angle -treated by
retracting the maxilla or
incisors or both
 Obtuse angle- suggests
maxillary hypoplasia-
treated by maxillary
advancement or orthodontic
proclination
26
 Lower lip chin contour should have an S curve
 Depth of labiomental sulcus – 4mm
 Angulation – 130 degrees
Acute – CL II div I
Flattened - CL III

27
 Chin throat angle provides
chin definition.
 Normal - 110 degrees.
 Distance between neck-
throat angle to soft tissue
pogonion should be
approx. 42mm.

28
Soft Tissue
1. Cranial base
1. Angle of
2. Horizontal measurements-

Skeletal convexity/facial form


3. Vertical measurements-
2. Naso labial angle
Skeletal & Dental

4. Maxilla and Mandible


3. Labio mental sulcus

5. Dental measurements 4. Chin throat angle

29
1. Includes all of the facial bones and a cranial
base reference.
2. Landmarks and measurements can be
altered by surgical procedures.
3. Measurements can be readily transferred to
a study cast for mock surgery.
4. For variations in age & sex- standards and
statistics are available.
30
31
 Vertical excess of lower third of face
 Visibility of upper teeth by more than 2-3mm
with lips in repose
 Gummy smile
 Difficulty in apposing the lips
 Acute nasolabial angle
 Convexity of facial profile
 Increased overjet and/or deep overbite

32
 Concave facial profile
 Nasolabial angle acute or obtuse
depending on the combination of
defects
 Reduced vertical dimension of lower
third of face
 Dishing of upper third of face
 Prominent lower lip
 Narrow upper arch

33
 Prognathism of mandible
 Anterior cross bite
 Elongated face
 Lower third of face is relatively longer
 Face appears concave
 Lower lip and chin are much
anteriorly placed than normal
 Class III relationship of occlusion

34
 Bird face appearance
 Severe overjet
 Class II relationship
 Crowding of lower teeth
 Flaring of lower anterior teeth
 Face appears small
 Lower third of face is short
 Stomion- menton is proportionately short
 Chin neck angle is obtuse

35
36
Thank You

37
38

You might also like