0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views16 pages

Is18299 2023

The document defines key terms related to structural design and proof checking consultancy services. It covers the scope, responsibilities, qualifications, and deliverables expected from stakeholders involved in structural design and proof checking of civil engineering structures.

Uploaded by

DSEngineer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views16 pages

Is18299 2023

The document defines key terms related to structural design and proof checking consultancy services. It covers the scope, responsibilities, qualifications, and deliverables expected from stakeholders involved in structural design and proof checking of civil engineering structures.

Uploaded by

DSEngineer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

भारतीय मानक IS 18299 : 2023

Indian Standard

सरं चनात्मक िडज़ाइन और सरं चनाओ ं क�


प्रमाण जांच परामशर् सेवाएँ — अपे�ाएँ

Structural Design and Proof


Checking Consultancy Services for
Structures — Requirements

ICS 91.010.01, 91.010.20, 91.010.30, 91.080.01, 93.010

 BIS 2023

भारतीय मानक ब्यरू ो


BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
मानक भवन, 9 बहादरु शाह ज़फर मागर्, नई िदल्ली - 110002
MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI - 110002
www.bis.gov.in www.standardsbis.in

August 2023 Price Group 7


Construction and Related Engineering Services Sectional Committee, SSD 06

FOREWORD

This Indian Standard was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by the Construction
and Related Engineering Services Sectional Committee had been approved by the Service Sector Division
Council.

The need for correct structural design and proof checking of structural designs has been recognized as an important
step in ensuring safety and durability of the structures and also for public safety in tandem with the rapid
advancement in engineering and the fast pace of development that is happening in the country. Adding confidence
and reducing risk through such a process is essential, since it provides risk mitigation on account of errors in the
design stage and thus ensures safety.

The intent of this standard is to:


a) overcome the shortcomings of the current practices and terminologies being followed (in the government
and private sectors) and suggest those that ought to be adopted and followed as a matter of good and
sustainable practices;
b) eliminate subjectivity/arbitrariness and bring transparency, uniformity, and inclusiveness in the
qualification requirements and appointment of a Principal Design Consultant (PDC) and a Proof Checking
Consultant (PC);
c) remove ambiguities that are evident or implied, by defining and thus clarifying the various associated
terms; and
d) elaborate the scope of services, deliverables, and associated responsibilities for the owner, PDC, PC and
constructor so that all stakeholders can take informed decisions while procuring and/or delivering such
services.

While preparing this standard, considerable assistance has been taken from Recommended Guidelines on Proof
Consultancy Services for Buildings published by Indian Association of Structural Engineers.

This Indian Standard defines the scope and responsibilities of various stakeholders, different models of
appointment of PDC, and different categories of proof checking based on project delivery modes. It also includes
the minimum qualification and experience of team members and team leaders of PDC and PC.

This Indian Standard excludes peer reviewing of structural designs where the reviewer has not been appointed by
the owner.

The educational qualification and experience of the team leader of PDC and PC mentioned in this standard are
the minimum requirements. However, users of such services may take appropriate decisions on it based on the
nature, importance and scope of work. A licensed/registered/empaneled structural engineer, where the practice
exists, may be appointed to act as the team leader of PDC/PC if it meets the requirements of the standard. The
intention of this standard is not to replace the registration and licensing system but to guide and bring uniformity.

The scope of the standard provides durability and sustainability aspects in services provided by PDC and PC apart
from functionality, safety and economic aspects. Considering the current scenario for structural design and proof
checking of structural designs, it is expected that PDC and PC should take up the project comprehensibly apart
from traditional roles.

The composition of the Committee, responsible for the formulation of this standard is given in Annex A.

For deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with the final value, observed, or
calculated, expressing the result of a test or analysis shall be rounded off in accordance with IS 2 : 2022 ‘Rules
for rounding off numerical values (second revision)’. The number of significant places retained in the rounded off
value should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.
IS 18299 : 2023

Indian Standard
STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND PROOF CHECKING
CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR STRUCTURES —
REQUIREMENTS

1 SCOPE 2.7 Owner — The individual or organization that


owns the project and engages the constructor,
This standard covers requirements of structural Principal Design Consultant (PDC),
design and proof checking consultancy services for Comprehensive Design Consultant (CDC), and
all types of civil engineering structures. It also Proof Checking Consultant (PC), as required.
includes responsibilities, educational
qualifications, and deliverables expected from all 2.8 Principal Design Consultant (PDC) — The
the stakeholders. individual or the organization responsible for
structural analysis and design of the structures.
2 TERMINOLOGY
2.9 Proof Checking — Checking of structural
For the purpose of this standard, the following designs by an individual or organization that is not
definitions shall apply. a part of the original design team.

2.1 Comprehensive Design Consultant (CDC) 2.10 Proof Checking Consultant (PC) — The
— The individual or the organization responsible individual or the organization responsible for
for comprehensive multidisciplinary engineering proof checking.
consultancy services including structural design
services. 2.11 Structural Design — Implies all the stages
related to a structure that includes
2.2 Constructor — The individual or conceptualization, planning, analyses, designs,
organization appointed by the owner that is drawings, detailing, considering but not limited to
responsible for the execution of the construction serviceability, constructability, durability,
works as per approved drawings and sustainability, and maintainability, to ensure that
specifications. the structure performs the functions specified
over its intended design service life as per
2.3 Design-Bid-Build Mode (Traditional applicable standards.
Mode) — The project delivery mode in which the
NOTE — Structural design includes ensuring the
owner is responsible for providing the design and completeness and correctness of parameters incorporated
drawings, technical specifications and Bill of in the structural analysis, loading and load combinations,
Quantities (BOQ) to the constructor for the and design of the structure to ensure compliance with the
execution of the works. structural design requirements of the construction
contract, relevant safety standards, codes and best
NOTE — The constructor is responsible for the engineering practices as well as model studies where
execution and delivery of the project. required and duly incorporating the requirements of the
technology know-how suppliers, system and equipment
2.4 Design and Build Mode — The project vendors, specialist consultants, as engaged by the
owner/constructor/CDC.
delivery mode in which the owner provides the
detailed scope, performance specifications and 2.12 Team Leader — The person responsible for
design requirements at the time of bidding to the overseeing and coordinating the work of the team
constructor. engaged in the structural analysis and design or its
NOTE — The design, execution and delivery are the
proof checking and having authority to sign on
responsibility of the constructor. behalf of the team.

2.5 Design Service Life — Period considered for 3 REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICES
which a structure or a part of it is to be used for its
intended purpose with periodic inspection and When determining the requirements for the
routine maintenance, but without major repair structural design and proof checking consultancy
being necessary. services offered to the owner/constructor/CDC, the
PDC and the PC shall ensure that the following
2.6 Field Work — Construction work related to
structures.

1
IS 18299 : 2023

requirements, but not limited to, are complied 5.2 The PC shall in all cases be always appointed
with: by the owner so that the PC is never subservient
to the constructor/CDC.
a) all applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements; 5.3 In case the owner has an in-house design team
b) functional requirements of the structure having the qualification and experience as
(inter alia of technology know-how specified in 9.2, the owner may either take up the
suppliers, system and equipment responsibility of PDC or PC. The owner shall
vendors, specialist consultants, and never be both PDC as well as PC simultaneously
others); for the same project.
c) consideration of the relevant construction
stage loadings; 5.4 The constructor/CDC/PDC shall never act as a
d) design service life of the structure as per proof checking consultant for the same project.
applicable standards;
6 MODELS OF APPOINTMENT OF PDC
e) delivery of services as per agreed
AND PC
timelines;
f) consideration of risks including multi- The contractual model for the appointment of the
hazard risks; and PDC and the PC may vary according to the nature
g) any specific requirements of the owner. of the project and the project delivery mode.

4 APPOINTMENT OF PDC 6.1 Model 1 — Owner Appointed PDC and PC

4.1 The owner/constructor/CDC (depending on The owner shall directly appoint both the PDC and
project delivery mode) shall appoint the PDC for the PC for structural designing and for proof
the structural design of the structures. checking, respectively. The good for construction
(GFC) drawings shall be submitted by the PDC to
4.2 In case of contracts where the structural the owner after approval by the PC as shown in
design is in the scope of the constructor/CDC and Fig. 1.
structural design is done in-house by constructor/
CDC, the constructor/CDC shall be responsible 6.2 Model 2 — Constructor Appointed PDC
and accountable to provide structural design for
sound, safe and durable structures. The design A design and build constructor as well as a PC
team of the constructor/CDC shall have the shall be independently appointed by the owner.
qualification and the experience of PDC as The PDC shall be appointed by the constructor.
specified in 9.2. The GFC drawings shall be submitted by the PDC
to the constructor after approval by the PC.
4.3 In case the PDC is appointed by the Thereafter, the constructor shall submit the design
constructor/CDC externally, the agreement and GFC drawings to the owner for consent before
between the owner and the constructor/CDC shall execution of the work as shown in Fig. 2.
clearly stipulate the conditions for the
appointment of PDC in terms of role, 6.3 All communications between the PDC, PC and
responsibility, experience, fee payable, etc. It shall the owner/constructor/CDC shall be documented.
be the responsibility of the constructor/CDC to
inform the owner about the appointed PDC along 7 SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
with qualifications, and terms and conditions of
7.1 Owner
appointment. Constructor/CDC, whoever
appoints the PDC, shall be primarily responsible The owner shall be responsible for the project
and accountable to provide structural design for either directly or through an appointed authorized
sound, safe and durable structures. The PDC representative or implementing agency. The
appointed shall have qualification and experience owner shall also:
as specified in 9.2.
a) prepare the contractual stipulations for the
5 APPOINTMENT OF PC PDC, PC and ensure that they have the
5.1 The owner may appoint a PC for proof qualification and required experience to
checking of the structural design of the structures carry out their respective assignments as
prepared by PDC. specified in 9.2;

2
IS 18299 : 2023

Owner

Principal Design Consultant Proof Checking Consultant (PC)


(PDC)

Issue of GFC drawings by PDC after approval by PC

Owner

FIG. 1 FLOWCHART FOR COMMUNICATION UNDER MODEL 1

FIG. 2 FLOWCHART FOR COMMUNICATION UNDER MODEL 2

3
IS 18299 : 2023

b) provide site specific data, design k) avoid revisions and corrections in design
requirements like the design brief, the inputs, and architectural and service
conceptual drawings, surveyed site plan, drawings, which may impact the structural
geotechnical investigation report, design, subsequent to submission of
proposed materials and methods of structural design by PDC, in case of design-
construction, the relevant contractual bid-build mode. Revision/corrections in
conditions, the functional requirements, architectural and service drawings and other
and constraints, if any, and any special design inputs should be done only in
construction loadings to the PDC in case exceptional and unavoidable circumstances.
of design- bid-build mode;
NOTE — The owner may issue a completion certificate
NOTE — The design brief should cover all the functional to the PDC and the PC in relation to the requirements
needs and aspirations as well as any other special needs of given in the design brief with reference to agreed
the owner. It should also address the issues related to the functional requirements and deliverables.
site and the situation that the owner wants the PDC to
incorporate in the structural designs. 7.2 Principal Design Consultant (PDC)

c) appoint the technology know-how The involvement of PC shall not relieve the PDC of
suppliers, system and equipment vendors, the responsibility towards the correctness,
and all specialist consultants as per project adequacy, and completeness of the structural
specific requirements; designs. The PDC shall:
d) ensure that the scope of work for PDC and a) ensure completeness and correctness of the
PC, including deliverables from them, structural designs, incorporation of
shall be well defined and a workable time requirements of the technology know-how
schedule given for structural design and suppliers, system and equipment vendors,
proof checking; various specialist consultants appointed for the
e) recognize that there can be differences of project, optimization of the structural designs
opinion between the PDC and the PC on and reviewing architectural and service
the structural design issues that need to be designs/drawings of the proposed structure
resolved by the owner in consultation with from structural engineering considerations;
the PDC and PC. In case of an unresolved
difference in opinion, an independent b) ensure the availability and completeness of the
third party view may be obtained by the information/reports from the owner/constructor
owner. The third party shall also meet the /CDC as follows, and ensure that they are
qualification and experience criteria as incorporated into the designs:
specified in 9.2 for the PC. The decision
1) the design brief, the functional
of the owner shall be final;
requirements, and constraints if any,
f) ensure that adequate supervision and from the owner;
quality control are provided by the owner 2) topographical survey drawings;
or by appointing a suitable agency during
3) geotechnical investigations and
various stages of construction and that the
recommendations;
construction materials and methods are as
specified in the contract drawings and 4) conceptual, detailed architectural and
specifications; service drawings of the proposed
structure;
g) ensure that the structure is used as
intended and maintained adequately on a 5) drawings for the proposed structures;
regular basis; 6) proposed materials and methods of
construction;
h) ensure to include the intention to appoint
PC, if applicable, as a condition of the 7) relevant construction stage loadings;
contract with the PDC, constructor, and 8) incorporation of notes/drawings
specialist consultants; regarding temporary safety
j) ensure that the responsibilities of PDC/PC requirements during construction;
are clearly specified in the conditions of 9) the relevant contractual conditions;
the contract to be made with them. The and
contract conditions between the 10) any other data relevant to the project
stakeholders may have provisions and required for structural design;
regarding professional liability insurance;
and

4
IS 18299 : 2023

c) ensure submission of comprehensive owner are the same. In case a conflict of


design documents and drawings to the interest arises during the assignment, it
owner for proof checking.The analysis and shall be declared by the PC immediately;
design calculations (consisting of input and d) enter into a written explicit agreement
output data of the software and manual with the owner about the scope of work;
calculations, if any) shall be presented in a e) document all the technical interactions
manner that is easily comprehensible and with the PDC;
can be checked. Every document shall be
f) thoroughly check the analysis and design
page numbered. Design calculations shall
calculation documents and structural
be presented with adequate cross
drawings and be fully responsible (in
referencing to standards, Design Basis
addition and independent of the
Report (DBR), and other documents,
responsibilities of the PDC) for the
wherever necessary. The design notes shall
accuracy and completeness of all the
contain explanatory sketches of the
analyses, designs, and drawings of the
structure and loadings. All documents and
structure, and issuing a certificate for
drawings shall be physically and/or
proof checking.
digitally signed with the date and stamped
by the team leader of the PDC; g) ensure that the structural system/scheme
chosen by the PDC meets the parameters as
d) ensure compliance with the observations
specifiedin 7.2 (b);
raised by the PC. Differences of opinion
between the PDC and the PC shall be h) do independent calculations, if necessary,
resolved by the owner as specified in to form a basis for arriving at the
7.1(e); conclusions. Independent calculations
shall invariably be done for all large,
e) act independently of the PC, constructor,
complex, or important structures. All
and any of their sub-constructors or
documents and drawings shall be
consultants, and shall maintain
physically and/or digitally signed with the
confidentiality throughout;
date and stamped by the team leader of PC
f) declare conflict of interest, if any, prior to before submitting them to the owner; and
accepting the assignment for structural
j) be responsible for the correctness of the
design. In case a conflict of interest arises
design in case the independent design has
during the assignment, it shall be declared
been carried out by PC as given in 8.2. The
by the PDC immediately;
PC shall submit the calculations and
g) enter into a written explicit agreement with certificate of proof checking to the owner.
the owner/constructor/CDC about the
scope of work; 7.4 Constructor
h) give clarification to the construction team
The constructor shall ensure proper supervision and
on the design and drawings provided by
quality control for each activity at the works by
him during the construction stage; and
deputing qualified and experienced engineers and
j) prepare an inspection and maintenance trained workers (skilled as well as unskilled) during
manual pertaining to structural all the stages of construction. The constructor shall
components, if desired by the owner. also:
7.3 Proof Checking Consultant (PC) a) ensure proper document control is
followed at the site. The latest GFC
The PC shall not be part of the main team of drawings shall always be available at the
structural design/PDC organization. The PC may be site and the same shall be used for
consulted by the PDC during the design process to construction;
provide preliminary thoughts, opinions, or
b) ensure that the PDC shall have the
comments on critical issues. The PC shall:
qualification and experience as specified
a) review the completeness and correctness in 9.2 in case of design and build mode;
of the structural design documents and c) provide site specific data and design
drawings produced by the PDC; requirements like the design brief, the
b) act independently of the PDC, constructor, conceptual drawings, surveyed site plan,
and any of their sub-constructors or geotechnical investigation report,
consultants, and shall maintain proposed materials and methods of
confidentiality throughout; construction, the relevant contractual
c) declare conflict of interest, if any, prior to conditions, the functional requirements,
accepting the assignment for proof and constraints if any, and any special
checking except where the PC and the construction loadings, to the PDC in case

5
IS 18299 : 2023

of design and build mode; The PDC and PC shall convey their
d) ensure all the contract conditions and acceptance of the model study report,
specifications are followed, and the project separately in writing to the owner;
shall be delivered as per the latest GFC d) PDC shall carry out the analyses and
drawings; designs, as discussed with and approved by
e) ensure the construction material, the PC, and thereafter, prepare the
workmanship, and finish meet the structural drawings, and submit the entire
requirements of the specifications as given package to the PC for the latter’s scrutiny
in the contract and/or as per the relevant and approval;
standards in case they are not specifically e) This interaction between PDC and PC can
incorporated in the contract, whichever are be carried out periodically at various stages
more stringent; of the project to suit the construction
f) ensure that all the fabrication drawings and requirements;
the methodology of construction to be f) PC shall communicate approval for the
adopted by the constructor are as agreed analyses and later for the designs in writing;
under the contract; and
g) avoid revisions and corrections in design g) PC shall sign the structural GFC drawings
inputs and architectural and services after signing by the PDC. The signed
drawings, which may impact the structural drawings shall then be submitted to the
design, after submission of structural owner.
design by PDC, in case of design and build
mode. Revision/corrections in architectural 8.2 Category 2
and service drawings and other design
inputs should be done only in exceptional a) The PC and PDC shall discuss and finalize
and unavoidable circumstances; and a mutually agreed DBR including
h) ensure submission of as-built drawings to conceptual structural system and schematic
the owner. drawings;

8 CATEGORIES OF PROOF CHECKING b) The PDC shall have the freedom to


analyze, design and detail the structure,
Proof checking can be done using any of the two and submit only the structural drawings to
categories as given in 8.1 and 8.2. The owner may the PC;
decide the category of proof checking to be adopted
depending on the type and complexity of the c) The PC shall carry out independent
structure. analysis and designs and shall review and
approve the structural drawings, in part, or
8.1 Category 1 of the complete structure and sign the
GFC drawings. The PC shall submit the
a) The PDC shall prepare the DBR and independent analysis and designs to the
framing plans, and discuss them with the owner; and
PC, who shall review and then approve the d) The PC shall communicate approval in
same; writing and sign the structural GFC
b) PDC shall also discuss with the PC, the drawings after signing by the PDC. The
method and mode of analyses and designs signed drawings shall then be submitted to
either manual or computerized, including the owner.
the use of any specific computer programs,
and idealization of the structure and its NOTE ― In Category 2, if there is a difference in the
final results of the analyses between those done by the
various elements, and the PC shall need to PDC and the PC, then both shall discuss the same based
approve the same; on the available accepted literature and references, to
c) For structures for which model studies resolve the matter and finalize the analyses and designs
so that the drawings based on the agreed approach could
(physical or digital) must be performed, the be issued. In case, if any difference of opinion remains
same shall also be discussed by the PDC between the PDC and the PC, then the owner shall
with the PC. The model studies to be carried resolve them as specified in 7.1 (e).
out and the agency, to be appointed by the
owner, shall be decided. The report of the 9 SUPPORT
model study shall be submitted to the
owner, who shall forward the 9.1 General
results/reports of the model studies for
review and discussion by the PDC and the The PDC and PC shall have adequate resources
PC with the agency appointed for the same. which shall inter alia include competent manpower,

6
IS 18299 : 2023

qualified and experienced structural design works for the structural analyses, designing, and
engineers, draftsmen, and other associated drawing for the project concerned as given in
manpower, infrastructure, equipment, and Table 1.
environment for operation of all the processes and
other facilities required to perform and complete NOTE — The owner may decide the additional
qualification for PDC or PC based on the type of
the work effectively, accurately and within the structure, health safety, and disaster (like an earthquake,
timeframe mutually agreed to with the owner. flood, cyclone, etc.) vulnerability requirements.

NOTE — Infrastructure should inter alia include 9.2.2 The team leader of both the PDC as well as
the following: the PC shall be an engineer who is engaged in the
a) Registered office and associated utilities; practice of structural engineering and shall have
b) Requisite computer hardware and software; and experience in the design of structural systems
c) Transportation resources. comparable in type, size, and complexity to those
under consideration.
9.2 Minimum Qualification and Experience of
PDC and PC 9.2.3 All PDC and PC team members engaged in
structural analysis and design shall possess a
9.2.1 The owner/constructor/CDC shall make sure minimum educational qualification of B.E./B.Tech
that the PDC and the PC, as applicable, engaged for (Civil) or equivalent degree recognized by the All
the project have the requisite minimum India Council for Technical Education/University
qualification and relevant experience in similar Grants Commission.

Table 1 Minimum Qualification and Experience of Team Leader of PDC and PC


(Clause 9.2.1)

Sl No. Type of Structure Team leader of PDC Team Leader of PC

(1) (2) (3) (4)


i) Buildings up to the height B.E./B.Tech (Civil) with 5 B.E./B.Tech (Civil) with 7 years of
of 15 m and culverts years of experience in experience in structural engineering
(length up to 6 m). structural engineering practice with designing and field work
practice with designing and of relevant structures. The
field work of relevant 7 years of experience shall comprise a
structures. The 5 years of minimum of 5 years exclusively in
experience shall comprise a structural designing.
minimum of 3 years
exclusively in structural
designing.
ii) Buildings of height more B.E./B.Tech (Civil) with B.E./B.Tech (Civil) with 10 years of
than 15 m and up to 50 m 7 years of experience in experience in structural engineering
and minor bridges (bridge structural engineering practice with designing and field work
length up to 60 m). practice with designing and of relevant structures. The
field work of relevant 10 years of experience shall comprise a
structures. The minimum of 7 years exclusively in
7 years of experience shall structural designing.
comprise a minimum of 5
years exclusively in structural
designing.

7
IS 18299 : 2023

Table 1 (Concluded)
Sl No. Type of Structure Team leader of PDC Team Leader of PC

(1) (2) (3) (4)


iii) Buildings of height more B.E./B.Tech (Civil) with Master’s degree with major in
than 50 m and specialized 10 years of experience in structural engineering and 10 years of
structures such as but not structural engineering experience in structural engineering
limited to tunnels, bridges, practice with designing and practice with designing and field work
flyovers, elevated roads, field work of relevant of relevant structures. The 10 years of
dams, chimneys, industrial, structures. The experience shall comprise a minimum
marine, and special 10 years of experience shall of 7 years exclusively in structural
structures. comprise a minimum of designing.
7 years exclusively in
structural designing. OR

B.E./B.Tech (Civil) with 15 years of


experience in structural engineering
practice with designing and field work
of relevant structures. The 15 years of
experience shall comprise a minimum
of 10 years exclusively in structural
designing.
NOTES
1 In case of Master’s degree in structural engineering, the required minimum experience may be reduced by 1 year and in case of a doctoral degree in
area of structural engineering, it may be reduced by 2 years. This note shall not be valid for Sl No. (iii) of Table 1.
2 The team leader of PDC and PC can be academic faculty member of recognized engineering institutions with relevant design experience as
given above.

8
IS 18299 : 2023

ANNEX A
(Foreword)
COMMITTEE COMPOSITION
Construction and Related Engineering Services Sectional Committee, SSD 06

Organization Representative(s)

Central Public Works Department, New Delhi SHRI RANJIT SINGH (Chairperson)
B&S Engineering Consultants Private Limited, SHRI ALOK BHOWMICK
Noida
CII - Indian Green Building Company Council, SHRI PRAVEEN KUMAR SOMA
Hyderabad
Central Public Works Department, New Delhi SHRI VINAYAK RAI
SHRI PRADEEP GARG (Alternate I)
SHRI AMRENDRA KUMAR JALAN (Alternate II)

Confederation of Construction Products and SHRI AMIT MALHOTRA


Services, New Delhi MS SARITA BALODHI (Alternate)

Construction Industry Development Council, DR P. R. SWARUP


New Delhi PROF NIRANJAN SWARUP (Alternate I)
SHRI ASHUTOSH BHARDWAJ (Alternate II)

Construction Skill Development Council of India, SHRI NARENDRA DESHPANDE


Gurugram
Consulting Engineers Association of India, SHRI A. P. MULL
New Delhi
Creative Design Consultants and Engineers Private SHRI AMAN DEEP GARG
Limited, Ghaziabad
Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi SHRI D. C. GOEL

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited, Delhi SHRI RAJ KUMAR GUPTA

Department of Delhi Fire Services, Govt of NCT of SHRI ATUL GARG


Delhi, New Delhi SHRI SANJAY KUMAR TOMAR (Alternate)

Hilti India Private Limited, New Delhi SHRI SHOUNAK MITRA

Housing and Urban Development Corporation SHRI DEEPAK BANSAL


Limited, New Delhi
Indian Association of Structural Engineers, SHRI MANOJ K. MITTAL
New Delhi
Indian Geotechnical Society, New Delhi PROF G. L. SIVAKUMAR BABU
DR A. P. SINGH (Alternate)

Indian Institute of Architects, Mumbai SHRI DIVYA KUSH

Indian Institute of Technology, Indore PROF SANDEEP CHAUDHARY

9
IS 18299 : 2023

Organization Representative(s)

Indian Plumbing Skills Council, New Delhi SHRI VINAY GUPTA


SHRI ROHIT KUMAR SAHA (Alternate)

Institute for Steel Development and Growth, SHRI ARIJIT GUHA


Kolkata SHRI P. L. RAO (Alternate)

Institute of Engineers India, New Delhi SHRI DINESH KUMAR


SHRI K. P. SINGH (Alternate)

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, SHRI B. K. SINHA


New Delhi SHRI BIDUR KANT JHA (Alternate)

National Accreditation Board for Certification SHRI AJAY SHARMA


Bodies, New Delhi SHRI PRATEESH TIWARI (Alternate)

National Buildings Construction Corporation SHRI NOVMAN AHMED


Limited, New Delhi SHRI MUDIT BHATNAGAR (Alternate)

National Council for Cement and Building DR B. P. RANGA RAO


Materials, Faridabad SHRI ARUP GHATAK (Alternate)

National Institute of Construction Management and DR ANIL AGARWAL


Research, Pune SHRI RAJESH GOYAL (Alternate)

Project Management Institute, New Delhi SHRI SESHA SAI

Town and Country Planning Organisation, SHRI JAGDEEP KUMAR KAPOOR


New Delhi SHRI SUDEEP ROY (Alternate I)
SHRI HARPAL DAVE (Alternate II)

In Personal Capacity (Plot 22-A, Sector - 17 C, Palm SHRI V. N. HEGGADE


Beech Marg Vashi, Navi Mumbai - 400705)

In Personal Capacity (Grace Villa, Kadamankulam SHRI JOSE KURIAN


PO, Thiruvalla - 689583)

BIS Directorate General SHRI S. K. KANOGIA, SCIENTIST ‘F’/SENIOR


DIRECTOR AND HEAD (SERVICE SECTOR)
[REPRESENTING DIRECTOR GENEAL (Ex-officio)]

Member Secretary
SHRI UMANG JAGGI
SCIENTIST ‘B’/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
(SERVICE SECTOR), BIS

10
IS 18299 : 2023

Subcommittee for drafting standard on Preconstruction Services, SSD 06 : 01

Organization Representative(s)

Indian Association of Structural Engineers, New Delhi SHRI MANOJ K. MITTAL (Convener)

Association of Consulting Civil Engineers India, SHRI AVINASH D. SHIRODE


Bengaluru SHRI SURYA PRAKASH (Alternate)

B&S Engineering Consultants Private Limited, Noida SHRI ALOK BHOWMICK

Cengrs Geotechnica Private Limited, Noida SHRI SANJAY GUPTA


SHRI RAVI SUNDARAM (Alternate)

Central Public Works Department, New Delhi SHRI PRADEEP GARG


SHRI AMRENDRA KUMAR JALAN (Alternate)

Consulting Engineers Association of India, New Delhi SHRI A. P. MULL

Creative Design Consultants and Engineers Private SHRI AMAN DEEP GARG
Limited, Ghaziabad
Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi SHRI D. C. GOEL

Indian Institute of Architects, Mumbai SHRI DIVYA KUSH

Indian Institute of Technology, Indore PROF SANDEEP CHAUDHARY

L&T Construction, Chennai SHRI C. K. SOMARAJU

National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited, SHRI NOVMAN AHMED


New Delhi SHRI MUDIT BHATNAGAR (Alternate)

Tandon Consultants Private Limited, New Delhi SHRI VINAY GUPTA

11
Bureau of Indian Standards

BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 to promote harmonious
development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and attending to
connected matters in the country.

Copyright

BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form without
the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing the
standard, of necessary details, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations. Enquiries relating to
copyright be addressed to the Head (Publication & Sales), BIS.

Review of Indian Standards

Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also reviewed
periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are
needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users of Indian Standards
should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the website-
www.bis.gov.in or www.standardsbis.in.
This Indian Standard has been developed from Doc No.: SSD 06 (19914).

Amendments Issued Since Publication


Amend No. Date of Issue Text Affected

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS


Headquarters:
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002
Telephones: 2323 0131, 2323 3375, 2323 9402 Website: www.bis.gov.in
Regional Offices: Telephones
Central : 601/A, Konnectus Tower -1, 6th Floor,
DMRC Building, Bhavbhuti Marg, New
2323 7617
Delhi 110002
Eastern : 8th Floor, Plot No 7/7 & 7/8, CP Block, Sector V,
Salt Lake, Kolkata, West Bengal 700091 2320
2367 0012
9474
Northern : Plot No. 4-A, Sector 27-B, Madhya Marg,
Chandigarh 160019
 265 9930
Southern : C.I.T. Campus, IV Cross Road, Taramani, Chennai 600113
2254 1442
2254 1216
Western : Plot No. E-9, Road No.-8, MIDC, Andheri
(East), Mumbai 400093
2821 8093
Branches : AHMEDABAD. BENGALURU. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR. CHANDIGARH. CHENNAI.
COIMBATORE. DEHRADUN. DELHI. FARIDABAD. GHAZIABAD. GUWAHATI.
HIMACHAL PRADESH. HUBLI. HYDERABAD. JAIPUR. JAMMU & KASHMIR.
JAMSHEDPUR. KOCHI. KOLKATA. LUCKNOW. MADURAI. MUMBAI. NAGPUR.
NOIDA. PANIPAT. PATNA. PUNE. RAIPUR. RAJKOT. SURAT. VISAKHAPATNAM.
Published by BIS, New Delhi

You might also like