Theory of Constraints
Theory of Constraints
e-ISSN:2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 25, Issue 11. Ser. 4 (November. 2023), PP 11-12
www.iosrjournals.org
I. Introduction
Theory of Constraints is not a popular management paradigm. While there are millions of management
consultants worldwide, the number of Theory of Constraint consultants is very few. What is even worse is that
Theory of Constraint(TOC) consultants run as a Mom and Pop store fashion. Of course there are some
management consulting firms specializing in Theory of Constraints, which are small sized operations, like
Goldratt Consulting in Israel, Marris Consulting in France and Vector Consulting in India. But besides these
exceptions, the norm is of very few mom and pop store in Theory of Constraints consulting.
This is more surprising because the book that espoused Theory of Constraints(TOC) paradigm – The
Goal, written by Eliyahu Goldratt – is a best seller and often discussed. Indeed the book, initially published in
1984 has been translated into many languages and has sold almost 10 million copies. Yet despite the popularity
of the book, the management philosophy of Theory of Constraints does not find too many takers.
This paper tries to find why this is so.
A constraint is something that prevents the system from achieving its goals. The steps of Theory of Constraint
are
1. Identify the constraint
2. Decide to exploit system constraint
3. Subordinate everything to constraint
4. Elevate the constraint
5. Go back to step 1
The underlying premise is that organisations can be measured by three parameters – throughput,
operational expense and inventory. Throughput is obviously the sales, inventory is the goods carried and
operational expense is the costs incurred in converting inputs to outputs. Now the way to optimize an
organisation is to maximize throughput and minimize both operational expense and inventory by removing
constraint.
But the problem with Theory of Constraints professionals is that they believe that TOC is the greatest
wisdom that has dawned in management discipline and that makes unnecessary any other management thought.
Mind you, while there is no doubt the Theory of Constraints(TOC) is well known, it is not even taught
in many business schools. Now while some TOC consultants boast the fact that it is taught in more than 200
universities and colleges, what that also means that TOC is not taught in more than 20,000 universities and
colleges. Which means in more than 99% of educational universities TOC is not taught. So TOC is not part of
mainstream management curriculum.
And yet Theory of Constraint consultants behave as if TOC is the only solution available in world and
worse all other management paradigms are wrong. Thus Theory of Constraint practitioners preclude every other
management thought in the world. This is very absurd, especially considering that most management schools do
not teach Theory of Constraints.
So on one hand Theory of Constraint practitioners are dismissive towards every other management
philosophy or paradigm. On other hand the main stream management and business academic and corporate
world does not consider Theory of Constraints as even meriting acceptance.
Thus there is a certain mutual exclusivity between main stream Management Paradigms and Theory of
Constraints. Hence Theory of Constraints is not very popular and doesn’t find wide acceptance.
IV. Conclusion
Theory of Constraints(TOC) is no doubt a very sensible management paradigm. But the problem is that
TOC consultants believe that Theory of Constraints is the solution to all organisation problems, thus obviating
the need for any other management theory. Clearly this fanaticism of TOC consultants is costing them a lot in
acceptance. If TOC consultants accept other management philosophies and position their offering within the
basket of all other management philosophies they may find greater acceptance.