0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views11 pages

Nutrients 11 01734 v3

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views11 pages

Nutrients 11 01734 v3

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

nutrients

Article
Physiological and Dietary Determinants of Iron
Status in Spanish Vegetarians
Angélica Gallego-Narbón , Belén Zapatera and M. Pilar Vaquero *
Department of Metabolism and Nutrition, Institute of Food Science, Technology and Nutrition (ICTAN-CSIC),
José Antonio Novais, 10, 28040 Madrid, Spain
* Correspondence: [email protected]

Received: 27 June 2019; Accepted: 24 July 2019; Published: 26 July 2019 

Abstract: Vegetarian diets may compromise iron status, as they provide non-haem iron which has
low bioavailability. Spanish lacto-ovo vegetarians (n = 49) and vegans (n = 55) were recruited and
haematological and biochemical iron parameters were analysed. Food and supplements consumption,
body composition, physical activity, menstrual blood losses and hormonal contraceptive use were
assessed. Four groups were studied: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), iron depletion (ferritin <15 ng/mL),
iron deficiency (ferritin ≥15 to ≤30 ng/mL), and iron sufficiency (ferritin >30 ng/mL). IDA was
uncommon (n = 5, 4.8%), 27.9% of participants were iron-depleted, and 30.8% were iron-deficient.
Serum ferritin was lower in women than men (p < 0.001) and IDA and iron depleted individuals were
all women. There were no differences attributed to diet type, time being vegetarian or physical activity.
The menstrual period length was negatively associated with transferrin saturation (ρ = −0.364,
p = 0.001) and hormonal contraceptive use (ρ = −0.276, p = 0.014). Iron supplements were consumed
most frequently by IDA and iron-deficient subjects (p = 0.031). Conclusions: Iron status did not
vary between lacto-ovo vegetarians and vegans and there was not an influence of the time following
a vegetarian diet. Although men were iron-sufficient, iron deficiency was frequent in women,
who should apply strategies to increase iron bioavailability, especially if they experience intense
menstrual blood losses.

Keywords: iron deficiency; iron status; body iron; ferritin; menstruation; vegetarian;
vegan; supplementation

1. Introduction
Appropriately planned vegetarian diets provide health benefits, but they are also associated with
a higher risk of iron deficiency than omnivorous diets [1]. The maintenance of adequate levels of
this micronutrient is essential for oxygen transport, energy storage, and protein synthesis [2]. Iron
deficiency may lead to iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), activate bone resorption, affect the immune
system, and limit physical activity [2,3]. On the opposite side, excessive iron deposits in the organism
have been linked with cardiometabolic alterations, including obesity and metabolic syndrome [4].
The most specific measure of iron stores is serum ferritin, although additional tests are
recommended. Transferrin and soluble serum transferrin receptor (sTfR), considered early indicators of
functional iron deficiency, are related to iron transport and their concentrations are increased with iron
depletion [5–7]. Prolonged insufficient iron supply to tissues eventually leads to IDA, characterised by
low haemoglobin, ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) and
mean corpuscular volume (MCV) [3,5]. When body iron decreases, iron absorption increases, as the
synthesis of hepcidin, a downregulator of iron absorption, is stimulated [2,6].
In this regard, vegetarian diets (including the vegan type) do not necessarily imply a low iron
intake, as they include iron-rich products, such as legumes, integral cereals, nuts, and green-leafy

Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734; doi:10.3390/nu11081734 www.mdpi.com/journal/nutrients


Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 2 of 11

vegetables [8]. However, plants contain exclusively non-haem iron, with low bioavailability and
whose absorption is dependent on the balance between iron absorption enhancers and inhibitors [6].
Among the enhancing factors, meat, absent in vegetarian diets, and vitamin C, highly consumed in
plant-based diets, are the most important [5,9]. Nevertheless, vegetarian diets are also rich in absorption
inhibitors, including phytates (present in whole grains, integral cereals and legumes), polyphenols
(present in coffee, tea and wine) and calcium [2,10]. Regarding iron status, previous research shows
that vegetarians have lower ferritin than non-vegetarians, but haemoglobin is usually similar in both
groups [1]. The absence of differences in IDA prevalence suggests an enhanced iron absorption in
vegetarians due to up-regulation.
Menstrual blood loss constitutes an additional determinant of iron status in women, as its
association with IDA has been demonstrated [11], but this factor is usually not taken into account in
research studies. In relation to this, hormonal contraceptive use reduces blood loss and should also be
considered in studies on iron status [12]. While non-menstruating women and men lose approximately
1 mg of iron daily, menstruating women lose 10 to 42 extra mg per menstrual cycle [6]. This loss
leads to lower iron status in women of reproductive age than in men independently of their diet [13].
Menstruation could be of special interest in vegetarian women, as previous reports suggest that they
present menstrual alterations [14].
The nutritional status of Spanish vegetarians has only begun to be addressed and their iron status
has never been studied. The estimates indicate that 1.5% of Spaniards follow a vegetarian diet [15] and
due to their scarce representation, the health status of this group has remained unexplored. The recent
data on food consumption of Spanish adults showed the number of non-fish consumers and non-meat
consumers, but not the number of people who did not consume any of them [16]. This suggests that
the proportion of vegetarians and their needs could have been underestimated.
This research evaluated the iron status of Spanish vegetarians using haematological and
biochemical markers, and studied the relations of iron stores with physical activity, menstruation, iron
supplementation, and dietary patterns.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants
Healthy adult (age ≥18 years) lacto-ovo vegetarians and vegans were recruited in the Madrid area
(Spain) through online advertisements. The exclusion criteria were: Consumption of meat or fish, eating
disorders, pregnancy, lactation, menopause, and diagnosed diseases (digestive, renal, haematological,
endocrine or oncological). In addition, volunteers were not included if they had donated blood during
the three months prior to the study. A total of 207 subjects were interested in the study, of which
44 decided not to participate and 58 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Therefore, 105 volunteers were
selected, of which 104 underwent the biochemical analyses and provided complete data.
The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines and procedures requiring human
subjects were approved by the ethics committees of Hospital Puerta de Hierro (Majadahonda, Spain)
and Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). A written informed consent was obtained from all
the participants.

2.2. Procedure and Determinations


The participants attended the institute after a fasting period of 12 h. The height and abdominal
and hip perimeters were measured. The body weight and body composition were obtained through the
body composition monitor Tanita BC-601 (Tanita Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands), body mass index
(BMI) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) were calculated. The blood samples were collected and leucocytes,
erythrocyte count (RBC), haemoglobin, haematocrit, MCV, MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin
concentration (MCHC), erythrocyte distribution width (RDW), platelets, and mean platelet volume
(MPV) were measured in the flow cytometer ADVIA 2120i (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 3 of 11

The serum samples were separated by centrifugation at 1000 g for 15 min in a Jouan CR-312
centrifuge (Jouan Ltd, Ilkeston, UK). The serum iron and transferrin were analysed in an ADVIA
Chemistry XPT clinical chemistry system and ferritin in an ADVIA Centaur XP analyser (Siemens
Healthineers, USA). sTfR was measured using an ELISA kit (DRG Instruments, Marburg, Germany).
The total iron binding capacity (TIBC) was calculated as 25.1 × serum transferrin (g/L), and TSAT
as serum iron (µmol/L)/TIBC × 100. sTfR/ferritin ratio was calculated and total body iron (TBI) was
obtained as: −[log (sTfR/ferritin) − 2.8229]/0.1207 [17].

2.3. Diet and Health Questionnaires


Dietary habits were studied through an optimized version of a previously published 160-item
food frequency questionnaire for self-defined vegans in the United States [18], that also permitted the
classification of volunteers as lacto-ovo vegetarians or vegans. The period of vegetarianism (<1 year,
1–3 years, 4–10 years, > 10 years), food frequency consumption (never or rarely, 2–4 times/month,
2–3 times/week, 4–6 times/week, once a day, ≥2 times/day), and iron supplementation (never,
1–12 times/year, 2–5 times/month, 2–6 times/week, daily consumed) were evaluated. The foods
with a mean consumption ≥2–4 times/month that were iron sources (≥2.1 mg/100 g), vitamin C sources
(≥12 mg/100 g) or contained iron absorption inhibitors (phytates or polyphenols), were selected for
statistical analysis. Iron and vitamin C food sources were obtained from the Spanish Food Composition
Database (BEDCA) and the Commission Directive 2008/100/EC [19,20]. Physical activity was estimated
by the short form of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). Menstruation and
hormonal contraceptive use were assessed by a gynaecological questionnaire [21].

2.4. Statistical Analysis


Normality was studied through Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and variables with non-normal
distributions were log-transformed. The differences between genders and diet types (lacto-ovo
vegetarian or vegan) in continuous variables were analysed by generalized linear models (GLM). The
volunteers were classified in four groups: IDA (haemoglobin <13 g/dL for men or <12 g/dL for women),
depletion (ferritin <15 ng/mL), iron deficiency (ferritin ≥15 to ≤30 ng/mL), and iron sufficiency (ferritin
>30 ng/mL) [22,23]. The differences among groups were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis or Pearson’s χ2
tests corrected by 10,000 Monte-Carlo simulations with a confidence interval of 99%. The association
among gynaecological variables and iron-status markers were studied by Spearman´s correlations.
The statistical analyses were performed in SPSS 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with significance level
of p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Participants


The participants were 30.3 ± 7.7 (mean ± SD) years old lacto-ovo vegetarians (49 subjects, 47.1%) or
vegans (55 subjects, 52.9%), and the majority were women (81 subjects, 77.9%; Table 1). The volunteers
were normoweight, with moderate to high physical activity and low consumption of iron supplements.
BMI (p = 0.030), WHR, body muscle weight, bone mass, water percentage, and abdominal muscle
(p < 0.001) were higher in men, while body fat (p < 0.001) and abdominal fat (p = 0.006) were higher in
women. The differences in physical activity, iron supplementation and body composition between diet
groups were not detected.
The levels of the studied markers are shown in Table 2. RBC, haemoglobin, haematocrit, TSAT,
ferritin, TBI, MCHC, and serum iron were significantly higher in men, while RDW, transferrin, and
sTfR/ferritin ratio were significantly higher in women. MCH was slightly higher in vegans (p = 0.041)
but no other significant differences between lacto-ovo vegetarians and vegans were found.
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 4 of 11

Table 1. The characteristics of the participants.

Women Men
LO-V (n = 38) Vegans (n = 43) All (n = 81) LO-V (n = 11) Vegans (n = 12) All (n = 23) PG * PD *
Age (year) 30.6 (8.1) 28.7 (6.9) 29.6 (7.5) 33.5 (9.0) 32.3 (7.3) 32.8 (8.0) 0.081 0.521
Iron supplementation
Never 30 (78.9) 35 (81.4) 65 (80.2) 11 (100.0) 11 (91.7) 22 (95.7)
1–12 times/year 5 (13.2) 6 (14.0) 11 (13.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.175 0.961
2–5 times/month 1 (2.6) 2 (4.7) 3 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
1–6 times/week 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Daily 2 (5.3) 0 (0.0) 2 (2.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (8.3) 1 (4.3)
Physical activity level
Low 2 (5.3) 4 (9.3) 6 (7.4) 2 (18.2) 0 (0.0) 2 (8.7) 0.767 0.913
Moderate 17 (44.7) 20 (46.5) 37 (45.7) 3 (27.3) 5 (41.7) 8 (34.8)
High 19 (50.0) 19 (44.2) 38 (46.9) 6 (54.5) 7 (58.3) 13 (56.5)
WHR 0.80 (0.0) 0.80 (0.1) 0.80 (0.1) 0.92 (0.1) 0.89 (0.1) 0.90 (0.1) <0.001 0.684
BMI (kg/m2 ) 22.8 (3.8) 21.7 (2.5) 22.2 (3.2) 25.0 (5.0) 23.0 (2.5) 24.0 (3.9) 0.030 0.125
Body fat (%) 26.1 (6.8) 25.1 (6.1) 25.6 (6.4) 16.1 (7.8) 13.7 (5.0) 14.8 (6.5) <0.001 0.342
Body muscle (kg) 41.5 (3.5) 40.7 (2.9) 41.1 (3.2) 60.4 (8.0) 58.7 (6.7) 59.5 (7.2) <0.001 0.450
Bone mass (kg) 2.2 (0.2) 2.2 (0.2) 2.2 (0.2) 3.2 (0.4) 3.1 (0.3) 3.1 (0.3) <0.001 0.348
Body water (%) 54.4 (4.7) 55.2 (4.5) 54.9 (4.6) 60.9 (7.0) 61.8 (3.9) 61.4 (5.5) <0.001 0.311
Abdominal fat (%) 21.7 (8.3) 20.4 (7.6) 21.0 (7.9) 17.1 (9.5) 13.9 (6.5) 15.5 (8.0) 0.006 0.217
Abdominal muscle
24.3 (3.1) 23.4 (1.7) 23.8 (2.5) 32.5 (4.5) 32.1 (4.0) 32.3 (4.1) <0.001 0.386
(kg)
The results expressed as the mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. D, diet type; G, gender; LO-V, lacto-ovo vegetarians; * GLM or Pearson’s χ2 test.
Significant differences are in bold.
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 5 of 11

Table 2. The haematological and biochemical markers according to gender and diet type.

Women Men
LO-V (n = 38) Vegans (n = 43) All (n = 81) LO-V (n = 11) Vegans (n = 12) All (n = 23) PG * PD *
Leucocytes (103 /µL) 6.1 (1.6) 5.9 (1.7) 6.0 (1.6) 5.8 (1.8) 5.7 (1.4) 5.8 (1.6) 0.411 0.697
RBC (106 /µL) 4.5 (0.3) 4.4 (0.3) 4.5 (0.3) 5.0 (0.5) 4.9 (0.3) 4.9 (0.4) <0.001 0.163
Haemoglobin
13.5 (1.2) 13.5 (0.9) 13.5 (1.1) 15.2 (1.0) 15.7 (0.8) 15.4 (0.9) <0.001 0.691
(g/dL)
Haematocrit (%) 41.1 (3.2) 40.8 (2.9) 40.9 (3.1) 45.0 (2.7) 45.9 (2.6) 45.5 (2.6) <0.001 0.952
MCV (fL) 90.6 (5.9) 93.1 (4.6) 91.9 (5.4) 91.1 (6.0) 93.4 (2.9) 92.3 (4.7) 0.928 0.431
MCH (pg) 29.7 (2.5) 30.8 (1.6) 30.3 (2.1) 30.7 (1.8) 31.9 (1.2) 31.3 (1.6) 0.079 0.041
MCHC (g/dL) 32.8 (1.3) 33.1 (0.9) 33.0 (1.1) 33.7 (0.8) 34.2 (1.1) 33.9 (1.0) 0.002 0.438
RDW (%) 13.8 (1.5) 13.2 (0.9) 13.5 (1.3) 12.9 (0.6) 12.7 (0.4) 12.8 (0.5) 0.004 0.180
Platelets (103 /µL) 252 (61) 241 (75) 246 (69) 241 (59) 188 (52) 213 (61) 0.080 0.078
MPV (fL) 10.0 (1.3) 10.2 (1.3) 10.1 (1.3) 9.7 (0.7) 10.1 (1.1) 9.9 (0.9) 0.488 0.431
Iron (µmol/L) 14.4 (8.2) 17.3 (8.0) 15.9 (8.2) 19.9 (6.3) 22.0 (8.1) 21.0 (7.2) 0.011 0.287
Transferrin (g/L) 3.1 (0.5) 3.3 (0.6) 3.2 (0.6) 2.7 (0.2) 2.6 (0.3) 2.6 (0.3) <0.001 0.940
TSAT (%) 19.0 (12.2) 21.8 (10.6) 20.5 (11.4) 29.5 (8.3) 33.6 (10.4) 31.6 (9.4) <0.001 0.240
Ferritin (ng/mL) 21.1 (14.3) 21.9 (16.1) 21.5 (15.2) 81.8 (68.8) 71.4 (19.1) 76.3 (48.6) <0.001 0.617
sTfR (mg/L) 0.9 (0.6) 0.8 (0.3) 0.8 (0.3) 0.8 (0.3) 0.8 (0.3) 0.8 (0.4) 0.364 0.641
sTfR/ferritin 67.4 (79.0) 70.7 (91.7) 69.2 (85.5) 26.8 (32.9) 12.3 (5.6) 19.2 (23.7) <0.001 0.452
TBI (mg/kg) 9.9 (3.5) 9.9 (3.4) 9.9 (3.4) 13.9 (4.3) 14.7 (1.8) 14.4 (3.2) <0.001 0.452
The results expressed as the mean (SD). D, diet type; G, gender; LO-V, lacto-ovo vegetarians. * GLM. Significant differences are in bold.
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 6 of 11

3.2. Iron Status, Menstruation, and Consumption Patterns


Table 3 shows the differences in iron biomarkers, iron supplementation, body composition and
vegetarian patterns of the four iron status groups. The proportion of iron sufficient individuals was low
(n = 38, 36.5%), including most of the men (n = 20, p < 0.001). The proportion of lacto-ovo vegetarians,
period of vegetarianism and physical activity was not significantly different among the groups. WHR,
body muscle, bone mass and abdominal muscle were higher in iron sufficient individuals (p < 0.001).
The menstruation parameters and hormonal contraception use did not vary among the groups (Table 4).
Further, 25% of the women used hormonal contraceptives. The menstrual period length and heavy
bleeding days were negatively associated (Spearman´s correlation) with hormonal contraceptive use
(ρ = −0.276, p = 0.014; and ρ = −0.260, p = 0.021) and TSAT (ρ = −0.364, p = 0.001; and ρ = −0.285,
p = 0.011). The frequency of consumption of peas (p = 0.013), zucchini (p = 0.005), and pasta (p = 0.030)
were higher in individuals with lower iron stores (Table 5).
Table 3. The vegetarian pattern, iron supplementation, physical activity, body composition, and iron
biomarkers of the volunteers according to iron status.

Depletion Deficiency Sufficiency


IDA (n = 5) P-Value *
(n = 29) (n = 32) (n = 38)
Women 5 (100.0) 29 (100.0) 29 (90.6) 18 (47.4) <0.001
Lacto-ovo vegetarians 2 (40.0) 14 (48.3) 17 (53.1) 16 (42.1)
Vegetarianism period
0.810
<1 year 0 (0.0) 3 (10.3) 7 (21.9) 3 (7.9) 0.382
1–3 years 3 (60.0) 13 (44.9) 11 (34.4) 17 (44.8)
4–10 years 1 (20.0) 9 (31.0) 5 (15.6) 13 (34.2)
≥10 years 1 (20.0) 4 (13.8) 9 (28.1) 5 (13.1)
Supplementation
Never 3 (60.0) 22 (75.9) 27 (84.5) 35 (92.2)
1–12 times/year 2 (40.0) 7 (24.1) 1 (3.1) 1 (2.6) 0.031
2–5 times/month 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (6.2) 1 (2.6)
1–6 times/week 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Daily 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (6.2) 1 (2.6)
Physical activity level
Low 1 (20.0) 1 (3.4) 3 (9.4) 3 (7.9) 0.163
Medium 3 (60.0) 16 (55.2) 16 (50.0) 10 (26.3)
High 1 (20.0) 12 (41.4) 13 (40.6) 25 (65.8)
WHR 0.8 (0.0) 0.8 (0.0) 0.8 (0.1) 0.9 (0.1) <0.001
BMI (kg/m2 ) 21.4 (3.3) 21.8 (2.9) 22.4 (3.6) 23.6 (3.6) 0.063
Body fat (%) 22.1 (7.9) 25.5 (6.3) 24.3 (7.3) 20.7 (8.8) 0.120
Body muscle (kg) 43.5 (1.9) 40.4 (2.8) 42.4 (6.7) 51.4 (10.5) <0.001
Bone mass (kg) 2.3 (0.1) 2.2 (0.2) 2.3 (0.3) 2.7 (0.5) <0.001
Body water (%) 57.5 (5.8) 54.8 (4.3) 55.6 (5.0) 57.9 (6.3) 0.204
Abdominal fat (%) 18.3 (8.4) 20.5 (8.1) 20.3 (7.8) 19.0 (8.8) 0.829
Abdominal muscle (kg) 24.8 (1.3) 23.3 (1.6) 24.7 (4.2) 28.5 (5.3) <0.001
Leucocytes (103 /µL) 4.5 (1.5) 5.7 (1.0) 6.2 (1.8) 6.2 (1.8) 0.130
RBC (106 /µL) 4.2 (0.2) 4.5 (0.2) 4.6 (0.4) 4.7 (0.4) 0.012
Haemoglobin (g/dL) 10.9 (1.2) 13.5 (0.8) 14.0 (0.9) 14.6 (1.3) <0.001
Haematocrit (%) 34.2 (2.4) 40.9 (2.0) 42.3 (2.7) 43.4 (3.7) <0.001
MCV (fL) 82.4 (8.6) 91.3 (5.5) 92.8 (4.7) 93.1 (3.4) 0.011
MCH (pg) 26.3 (3.8) 30.0 (2.0) 30.6 (1.5) 31.3 (1.5) <0.001
MCHC (g/dL) 31.8 (1.4) 32.9 (0.9) 33.0 (1.0) 33.8 (1.1) 0.001
RDW (%) 15.0 (1.6) 13.8 (1.0) 13.3 (1.4) 12.8 (0.6) <0.001
Platelets (103 /µL) 299 (81) 243 (63) 243 (64) 224 (72) 0.244
MPV (fL) 9.8 (1.4) 10.0 (1.3) 10.1 (1.2) 10.0 (1.1) 0.972
Iron (µmol/L) 6.5 (7.2) 13.5 (7.8) 18.1 (6.4) 20.2 (8.1) <0.001
Transferrin (g/L) 3.4 (0.2) 3.5 (0.6) 3.1 (0.4) 2.7 (0.5) <0.001
TSAT (%) 8.0 (9.4) 15.6 (8.5) 23.8 (8.4) 29.8 (12.1) <0.001
Ferritin (ng/mL) 7.1 (6.9) 9.6 (3.0) 22.0 (4.4) 65.3 (40.4) <0.001
sTfR (mg/L) 1.6 (0.9) 0.8 (0.4) 0.8 (0.4) 0.7 (0.2) 0.041
sTfR/ferritin 389 (289) 107 (82) 39 (22) 13 (7) <0.001
TBI (mg/kg) 3.4 (4.5) 7.3 (2.2) 10.7 (1.8) 14.6 (2.1) <0.001
The results expressed as the mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables. * Kruskal-Wallis
or Pearson’s χ2 tests. Significant differences are in bold.
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 7 of 11

Table 4. The gynaecological characteristics of women according to iron status.

Depletion Deficiency Sufficiency


IDA (n = 5) P-Value *
(n = 29) (n = 29) (n = 18)
Menstruation
Cycle length, days 30.6 (8.2) 28.2 (2.7) 28.6 (3.4) 28.2 (2.7) 0.965
Period length, days 5.4 (0.5) 4.7 (1.4) 4.7 (1.0) 4.4 (0.5) 0.290
Heavy bleeding, days 2.8 (0.4) 2.2 (1.1) 2.0 (0.9) 1.9 (0.7) 0.128
Hormonal contraceptives
Contraceptive users 0 (0.0) 7 (24.1) 7 (24.1) 6 (33.3) 0.529
Contraceptive type
Oral 0 (0.0) 1 (3.4) 5 (17.2) 4 (22.2)
Vaginal ring 0 (0.0) 5 (17.2) 1 (3.4) 2 (11.1) 0.383
Patch 0 (0.0) 1 (3.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Implant 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.4) 0 (0.0)
The results expressed as the mean (SD) for continuous variables and n (%) for hormonal contraceptive type.
* Kruskal-Wallis or Pearson´s χ2 tests.

Table 5. The dietary patterns in relation to iron status.

Depletion Deficiency Sufficiency


IDA (n = 5) P-Value *
(n = 29) (n = 31) (n = 38)
Iron sources
Bread (integral) 2.0 (3.5) 2.0 (3.0) 2.0 (3.0) 2.0 (2.0) 0.838
Bread (rye) 2.0 (2.5) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.578
Chickpeas 3.0 (2.0) 2.0 (0.0) 2.0 (2.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.190
Lentils 3.0 (1.5) 2.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.2) 0.168
Peas 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (0.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.013
Quinoa 2.0 (1.0) 1.0 (0.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (0.0) 0.403
Spinach (boiled) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (0.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.841
White beans 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.480
Vitamin C sources
Asparagus 2.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.634
Avocado 2.0 (1.5) 3.0 (2.0) 2.0 (2.0) 2.0 (2.0) 0.446
Blueberries 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.705
Broccoli 2.0 (2.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.347
Cauliflower 1.0 (0.5) 1.0 (0.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.511
Green beans 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.580
Kiwi 2.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.627
Lettuce 2.0 (3.0) 2.0 (2.0) 2.0 (2.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.178
Melon 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.879
Orange 1.0 (3.0) 1.0 (2.0) 2.0 (0.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.087
Orange juice 2.0 (2.5) 0.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.744
Peas 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (0.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.013
Potato 2.0 (0.0) 2.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 2.0 (2.0) 0.298
Pumpkin 2.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.503
Strawberry 2.0 (0.5) 1.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.108
Tangerine 1.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.2) 0.679
Tomato 3.0 (2.0) 3.0 (2.0) 2.0 (1.0) 3.0 (2.0) 0.831
Zucchini 3.0 (2.5) 2.0 (1.5) 2.0 (2.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.005
Absorption inhibitors
Bread (integral) 2.0 (3.0) 2.0 (3.0) 2.0 (3.0) 2.0 (2.0) 0.831
Bread (rye) 2.0 (2.5) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.578
Coffee 1.0 (4.0) 3.0 (4.0) 2.0 (4.0) 3.0 (4.0) 0.890
Tea 3.0 (4.0) 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (3.0) 1.5 (3.0) 0.241
Pasta 3.0 (1.5) 2.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.5 (1.0) 0.030
Quinoa 2.0 (1.0) 1.0 (0.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (0.0) 0.415
Rice (integral) 2.0 (1.5) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.754
The results expressed as the median (interquartile range). The considered categories were: 0, never; 1,
2–4 times/month; 2, 2–3 times/week; 3, 4–6 times/week; 4, once a day; 5, ≥2 times/day. * Pearson’s χ2 test.
Significant differences are in bold.
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 8 of 11

4. Discussion
This study examined the iron status of Spanish vegetarians for the first time. The results
reveal that IDA prevalence was low, consistent with previous reports in vegetarians from developed
countries [13,24,25]. In order to detect iron deficiency before the appearance of IDA, sTfR in addition
to the classical iron markers was determined. This marker, in contrast to ferritin, is not affected by
inflammation and is increased in the first stages of iron deficiency. The sTfR/ferritin and TBI indexes
were also calculated, that have previously proved to be useful in iron deficiency diagnosis [26]. In this
regard, sTfR/ferritin decreases as iron status increases in the studied subjects. The dietary characteristics,
physical activity and menstruation patterns were also evaluated and allowed the identification of the
main predictors of iron status in this population.
Vegetarian men results indicate iron sufficiency, as none of them were anaemic and the cases
of low iron status were anecdotic (n = 3, 13%). In contrast, approximately 78% of women exhibited
iron deficiency or depletion. These results are in line with other studies in lacto-ovo vegetarian and
vegan women from different developed countries that obtained ferritin levels ranging from 14 to
26 ng/mL [24,25,27]. The present results show lower iron status than observed in a recent study in
German vegetarians [28]. The higher iron status may be expected in vegans as dairy products reduce
iron bioavailability [2,29], but similar rates of iron deficiency and iron depletion in both diet groups
were observed, which can be explained by the low consumption of milk of the lacto-ovo vegetarian
participants [30]. Moreover, the dietary patterns were not clearly different in the four iron status groups.
The highest consumption of several iron and vitamin C rich foods, such as peas, was observed in the
IDA group. However, this group also presented a high consumption of iron absorption inhibitors such
as pasta, which included integral pasta and was generally served with spices (oregano, pepper, basil,
etc.) which are considered inhibitors [2]. These results suggest that iron bioavailability is dependent
on the consumption of absorption enhancers and inhibitors and their combination in the diet [31].
Therefore, the type of vegetarian diet, lacto-ovo vegetarian or vegan, appears to have a minor effect.
The iron status of women can be mainly attributed to menstruation, in line with previous findings [11,21].
The menstruation length was negatively associated with TSAT, and anaemic individuals tended
to have longer menstruations than the rest of women. These women also reported not being
hormonal contraceptive users, which is consistent with the negative association between hormonal
contraceptive use and menstruation length hereby observed and with previous studies demonstrating
that contraceptives can reduce menstrual blood loss [21]. Interestingly, iron supplementation was more
frequent in groups with low iron status than in the iron-sufficient group, suggesting an awareness of
IDA risk in these vegetarians. In order to prevent iron deficiency, foods containing iron absorption
inhibitors (such as bran, coffee and tea) should be ingested separately from meals providing non-haem
iron, and foods containing iron enhancers should be consumed with the main iron containing meal. In
addition, women with high menstrual blood losses, at risk of iron deficiency, should check their iron
stores and haematological parameters regularly.
In this survey, sedentary subjects represented less than 10% of the participants. Low physical
activity is expected in anaemic subjects, which is consistent with the obtained results [23]. In addition,
the performance of intense exercise is associated with low ferritin, especially in women with intense
menstrual losses [32]. The results on physical activity and body composition should be interpreted
considering gender differences, as men naturally exhibit higher muscle and bone mass than women.
Nevertheless, although physical activity was not higher in men, the highest proportion of active
subjects was observed in the iron-sufficient group including most of the men, and the lowest in the
IDA group.
Finally, an association between the period of vegetarianism and iron status was not detected, with
iron deficiency present in short-term and long-term vegetarians. The lower iron status that long-term
vegetarians could potentially exhibit might be masked by more significant factors, including menstrual
blood loss or adaptation to a low iron status by an increased absorption.
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 9 of 11

This study has several limitations. The sample is not representative of the Spanish vegetarian
population, since the number of vegetarians in this country is unknown, and a control group of
omnivores has not been included for comparison. In addition, the dietary assessment was performed
through a food frequency questionnaire and the collected dietary data were not quantitative. However,
its main strength is that all iron status biomarkers were analysed, and dietary, physiological and
behavioural factors were also considered, allowing a comprehensive study of iron status.

5. Conclusions
Insufficient iron status was detected in vegetarian women, being menstruation and hormonal
contraceptive use the main predictors, while men were generally iron sufficient. The influence of the
type of vegetarian diet was negligible, probably due to the balance between iron absorption enhancers
and inhibitors, and iron supplementation practice was noticed in anaemic and iron deficient women.
Although the prevalence of IDA in this population is low, menstruating women should combine foods
properly to prevent iron deficiency. Our results suggest that nutritional supplements should not be
widely recommended to vegetarians, although women with intense menstrual blood losses should
apply dietary strategies to improve iron bioavailability, i.e., consume iron absorption enhancers with
the main meals, while iron inhibitors separated from the main meals, and regularly check their iron
status in order to know if they need an iron supplement.

Author Contributions: Data curation: A.G.-N., B.Z.; formal analysis: A.G.-N.; funding acquisition: M.P.V.;
supervision: M.P.V.; validation: M.P.V.; writing—original draft: A.G.-N.; writing—review and editing: B.Z., M.P.V.
Funding: The study was supported by a research project financed by Zamdeh Laboratories (Veggunn study).
Acknowledgments: A. Gallego-Narbón contract was funded by the Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) from the
European Social Fund (ESF).
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Funders had no role in the design, data collection,
analysis or writing of this article.

References
1. Melina, V.; Craig, W.; Levin, S. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets. J. Acad.
Nutr. Diet. 2016, 116, 1970–1980. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Blanco-Rojo, R.; Vaquero, M.P. Iron bioavailability from food fortification to precision nutrition. A review.
Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 51, 126–138. [CrossRef]
3. Toxqui, L.; Vaquero, M.P. Chronic iron deficiency as an emerging risk factor for osteoporosis: A hypothesis.
Nutrients 2015, 7, 2324–2344. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Vaquero, M.P.; García-Quismondo, Á.; del Cañizo, F.J.; Sánchez-Muniz, F.J. Iron Status Biomarkers and
Cardiovascular Risk. In Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Risks; Kumar, A., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia,
2017. [CrossRef]
5. Blanco-Rojo, R.; Pérez-Granados, A.M.; Toxqui, L.; González-Vizcayno, C.; Delgado, M.A.; Vaquero, M.P.
Efficacy of a microencapsulated iron pyrophosphate-fortified fruit juice: A randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study in Spanish iron-deficient women. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 105, 1652–1659. [CrossRef]
6. Killip, S.; Bennett, J.M.; Chambers, M.D. Iron deficiency anemia. Am. Fam. Phys. 2007, 75, 671–678. [PubMed]
7. Koulaouzidis, A.; Said, E.; Cottier, R.; Saeed, A.A. Soluble transferrin receptors and iron deficiency, a step
beyond ferritin. A systematic review. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2009, 18, 345–352.
8. Haider, L.M.; Schwingshackl, L.; Hoffmann, G.; Ekmekcioglu, C. The effect of vegetarian diets on iron status
in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1359–1374. [CrossRef]
9. Navas-Carretero, S.; Perez-Granados, A.M.; Schoppen, S.; Sarria, B.; Carbajal, A.; Vaquero, M.P. Iron status
biomarkers in iron deficient women consuming oily fish versus red meat diet. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 65,
165–174. [CrossRef]
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 10 of 11

10. Moretti, D. Plant-Based Diets and Iron Status. In Vegetarian and Plant-Based Diets in Health and Disease
Prevention; Mariotti, F., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 715–727.
11. Blanco-Rojo, R.; Toxqui, L.; Lopez-Parra, A.M.; Baeza-Richer, C.; Perez-Granados, A.M.; Arroyo-Pardo, E.;
Vaquero, M.P. Influence of diet, menstruation and genetic factors on iron status: A cross-sectional study in
Spanish women of childbearing age. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 4077–4087. [CrossRef]
12. Harvey, L.J.; Armah, C.N.; Dainty, J.R.; Foxall, R.J.; John Lewis, D.; Langford, N.J.; Fairweather-Tait, S.J.
Impact of menstrual blood loss and diet on iron deficiency among women in the UK. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 94,
557–564. [CrossRef]
13. Hawk, S.N.; Englehardt, K.G.; Small, C. Risks of iron deficiency among vegetarian college women. Health
2012, 4, 113–119. [CrossRef]
14. Pilis, W.; Stec, K.; Zych, M.; Pilis, A. Health benefits and risk associated with adopting a vegetarian diet.
Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2014, 65, 9–14. [PubMed]
15. AESAN. Encuesta Nacional de Ingesta Dietética Española (ENIDE); Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria
y Nutrición: Madrid, Spain, 2011.
16. AECOSAN. Encuesta Nacional de Alimentación en Población Adulta, Mayores y Embarazadas (ENALIA 2); Agencia
Española de Consumo, Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (AECOSAN): Madrid, Spain, 2016.
17. Cook, J.D.; Flowers, C.H.; Skikne, B.S. The quantitative assessment of body iron. Blood 2003, 101, 3359–3364.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Dyett, P.; Rajaram, S.; Haddad, E.H.; Sabate, J. Evaluation of a validated food frequency questionnaire for
self-defined vegans in the United States. Nutrients 2014, 6, 2523–2539. [CrossRef]
19. Spanish Food Composition Database (BEDCA). Database v1.1. BEDCA Network & Agencia Española de
Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (AESAN). 2007. Available online: http://www.bedca.net/bdpub/index_
en.php (accessed on 27 February 2019).
20. Commission Directive 2008/100/EC of 28 October 2008 amending Council Directive 90/496/EEC on Nutrition Labelling
for Foodstuffs as Regards Recommended Daily Allowances, Energy Conversion Factors and Definitions; Official
Journal of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2008.
21. Toxqui, L.; Perez-Granados, A.M.; Blanco-Rojo, R.; Wright, I.; Vaquero, M.P. A simple and feasible
questionnaire to estimate menstrual blood loss: Relationship with hematological and gynecological
parameters in young women. BMC Womens Health 2014, 14, 71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. World Health Organization. Iron Deficiency Anemia: Assessment, Prevention and Control; WHO: Geneva,
Switzerland, 2001.
23. Camaschella, C. Iron deficiency: New Insights into Diagnosis and Treatment. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol.
Educ. Program. 2015, 2015, 8–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Waldmann, A.; Koschizke, J.W.; Leitzmann, C.; Hahn, A. Dietary iron intake and iron status of German
female vegans: Results of the German vegan study. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2004, 48, 103–108. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
25. Elorinne, A.L.; Alfthan, G.; Erlund, I.; Kivimaki, H.; Paju, A.; Salminen, I. Food and Nutrient Intake and
Nutritional Status of Finnish Vegans and Non-Vegetarians. PLoS ONE 2016, 1, e0148235. [CrossRef]
26. Leonard, A.J.; Patterson, A.J.; Collins, C.E.; Chalmers, K.A. Is soluble transferrin receptor a useful marker in
early stage iron deficiency? e-SPEN J. 2013, 8, e210–e212. [CrossRef]
27. Ball, M.J.; Bartlett, M.A. Dietary intake and iron status of Australian vegetarian women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
1999, 70, 353–358. [CrossRef]
28. Nebl, J.; Schuchardt, J.P.; Ströhle, A. Micronutrient Status of Recreational Runners with Vegetarian or
Non-Vegetarian Dietary Patterns. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Toxqui, L.; Pérez-Granados, A.M.; Blanco-Rojo, R.; Wright, I.; González-Vizcayno, C.; Vaquero, M.P. Effects
of an iron or iron and vitamin D-fortified flavored skim milk on iron metabolism: A randomized controlled
double-blind trial in iron-deficient women. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2013, 32, 312–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Gallego-Narbon, A.; Zapatera, B.; Barrios, L.; Vaquero, M.P. Vitamin B12 and folate status in Spanish lacto-ovo
vegetarians and vegans. JNS 2019, 8, e7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 2019, 11, 1734 11 of 11

31. Hurrell, R.; Egli, I. Iron bioavailability and dietary reference values. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1S–7S.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Beard, J.; Tobin, B. Iron status and exercise. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 594S–597S. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

You might also like