Iso 8503-3
Iso 8503-3
Part 3 :
Method for the calibration of IS0 surface profile
comparators and for the determination of surface profile -
Focusing microscope procedure
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Partie 3 : M&hode pour Btalonner les Bchantillons de comparaison viso-tactile IS0 et pour
caractdriser un profil de surface - Utilisation d’un microscope optique
Reference number
IS0 8503-3 : 1988 (E)
International Standard IS0 8503-3 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 35,
Paints and varnishes.
Users should note that all International Standards undergo revision from time to time
and that any reference made herein to any other International Standard implies its
latest edition, unless otherwise stated.
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Printed in Switzedand
Part 3 :
Method for the calibration of IS0 surface profile
comparators and for the determination of surface profile -
Focusing microscope procedure
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- 1
Copyright International Organization for Standardization
Provided by IHS under license with ISO Licensee=Shell Global Solutions International B.V./5924979112
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 01/07/2008 22:29:31 MST
IS0 8503-3 : 1966 (E)
1 .l This part of IS0 8503 specifies the focusing microscope 5.1 Optical microscope, having a fine focus adjustment
and describes the procedure for calibrating IS0 surface profile with little or no backlash (play) (see clause A.5 in annex A). The
comparators complying with the requirements of IS0 8563-l. adjustment shall give fine control of the movement of the ob-
iective or stage and shall be fitted with a graduated vernier scale
having a scale value of not more than i urn. The microscope
1.2 This part of IS0 8503 is also applicable to the determina-
shall have an objective lens with a numerical aperture of not
tion of the surface profile, within the range h, = 20 to 200 pm,
less than 0.5 together with an eyepiece lens to give a field of
of essentially planar blast-cleaned steel. The determination may
view greater than 0.5 mm in diameter. The field of view may be
be carried out on a representative section of the blast-cleaned
reduced by the use of a circular eyepiece reticle or by a stop in
substrate or, if direct observation of the surface is not feasible,
the lamphouse.
on a replica of the surface (see annex El.
NOTE - Advice concerning the use of the microscope is given in
NOTE - Where appropriate, this procedure may be used for assessing
annexes A and D. Annex A describes a procedure for determining the
the roughness profile of other abrasive blast-cleaned substrates.
microscooe backlash. Annex D exolains the significance of the defined
variables’for the microscope. (See also the note to 5.2.)
An alternative procedure is described in IS0 8503-4.
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
5.2 Light source, fitted to the microscope (5.1) to illuminate
2 References the test surface perpendicular to its plane. Light filters may be
used to minimize glare.
IS0 4618, Paints and varnishes - Vocabulary.
NOTE - These requirements for the apparatus (5.1 and 5.2) are
IS0 8503, Preparation of steel substrates before application of generally met by microscopes for metallurgical purposes.
paints and related products - Surface roughness character-
istics of blast-cleaned steel substrates
6 Test surfaces
- Part 1 : Specifications and definitions for IS0 surface
profile comparators for the assessment of abrasive blast-
6.1 IS0 surface profile comparator
cleaned surfaces.
Observation of the test surface over a specified field of view Determine the surface profile as described in clause 7.
using a specified microscope. Adjustment of the microscope,
by movement of the objective (or the stage), to focus on the NOTE - if a replica (see annex E) is to be measured, clean it only with
highest peak within the field of view. Determination of the a dry brush.
2
Copyright International Organization for Standardization
Provided by IHS under license with ISO Licensee=Shell Global Solutions International B.V./5924979112
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 01/07/2008 22:29:31 MST
IS0 8503-3 : 1988 (E)
source (5.2) to illuminate the test area, normal to the plane of 8.2 If the method is used to calibrate an IS0 surface profile
the surface. Focus the microscope approximately on the sur- comparator and if the standard deviation obtained is more than
face. one-third of the mean result, repeat the procedure (clause 71,
and obtain the mean and standard deviation for the 40
readings. If the standard deviation is still more than one-third of
7.2 Raise the objective until no part of the test area is in focus
the mean, reject the comparator as the profile is of inadequate
(see the notes). Then slowly lower the objective, using the fine
uniformity.
adjustment knob, until the first point in the observed area just
comes into focus. On the form given in annex C, record the
reading r, on the vernier scale as the height of the highest peak 8.3 If the method is used to determine the profile of a blast-
in that field of view. cleaned surface, either directly or from a replica, report h,,
together with the standard deviation and the maximum reading
NOTES
of h, to indicate the degree of uniformity of the surface
1 On some microscopes, the objective is fixed and the stage is roughness.
movable. Adjustment of focus is achieved by raising or lowering the
stage.
The form of the test report is given in annex B and shall contain
7.3 Lower the objective until no part of the test area is in at least the following information :
focus (see the notes to 7.2). Then slowly raise the objective un-
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
til the first point in the observed area just comes into focus. On a) the identification of the IS0 surface profile comparator
the form given in annex C, record the reading r2 on the vernier and the segments tested or, if the profile of a steel substrate
scale, corrected for any backlash (see annex A), as the depth of was determined, the identification of the steel substrate and
the lowest valley in that field of view. If the reading cannot be whether a replica of the substrate was used;
corrected for backlash in the microscope movement, continue
to raise the objective until the lowest valley is no longer in b) a reference to this part of IS0 8503 (IS0 8503-3);
focus. Then slowly lower the objective until the lowest valley is
once more in focus. Record the reading r2 on the vernier scale cl the magnification of the objective lens, and its
as the depth of the lowest valley in that field of view. numerical aperture;
If the standard deviation obtained is less than one-third of the i) the name of the operator;
mean, report the standard deviation and the result as the
“mean maximum peak-to-valley height h,“. j) the date of the test.
3
Copyright International Organization for Standardization
Provided by IHS under license with ISO Licensee=Shell Global Solutions International B.V./5924979112
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 01/07/2008 22:29:31 MST
IS0 8503-3 : 1988 (EI
Annex A
A.1 Carry out the following procedure using the microcope Repeat this procedure without moving the comparator until 20
(5.1) but with the magnification increased to between X 360 to readings have been obtained, and then calculate their mean
x 450. ifi).
bl steel substrate/replica”
4. Microscope details
intermediate magnification’l x
Eyepiece magnification x
Total magnification x
Segment 2
Segment 3
-
Segment 4
Steel substrate/replica4)
:
6. Any deviations from the standard procedure’)
21 If applicable.
4) Delete as appropriate.
5
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Annex C
bj Steel substrate/replica2)
Segment 2
Readinq3’ 1
No.-
‘2
1
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1) Delete as appropriate.
Annex D
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
D.l Depth of field and field diameter the procedure outlined in clause 7 suggests that, for a
microscope with a fine adjustment mechanism that is free from
When using an optical microscope, the choice of lenses
backlash (play), the direction of the final focusing movement
available to obtain the magnification required for observations
for the valley depths can be the opposite of that used when
dictates the depth of field and the maximum field diameter. The
measuring the peak heights. This deviation is permitted in order
depth of field is controlled by the numerical aperture of the
to increase substantially the speed of operation, because a fine
objective lens which permits the accurate determination of
adjustment mechanism that is free from backlash would in-
peak heights and valley depths. However, the smaller field
troduce no error when focusing from opposite directions.
diameter that results from the use of a high numerical aperture
lens and the consequent higher magnification, may fail to con-
Therefore, if the fine adjustment mechanism of the microscope
tain an adequate representation of high peaks and low valleys.
has backlash, it is imperative either that the final focus move-
At lower magnifications, the field diameter is larger and hence
ment be always made in the same direction to prevent the
representative peaks and valleys are more likely to be present,
introduction of error or that the backlash determined in
but the coarser depth of field may prevent a precise determina-
clause A.5 of annex A be used.
tion of their respective heights.
The distribution of the magnification between the objective and Obviously, the procedure for a microscope where its fine ad-
eyepiece lenses is important in controlling the depth of field. justment mechanism is free from backlash is much easier for
When a magnification of X 150 is required, the selection of a the observer and is more efficient. Therefore, it is suggested
X 10 objective and a X 15 eyepiece would comply. However, a that every effort be made to ensure the proper movement of the
typical X 10 objective has a numerical aperture of 0,26 and fine adjustment mechanism.
would give a depth of field of about 7 urn. By selecting a X 20
objective with a numerical aperture of not less than 0,5, the Annex A gives the procedure for determining the backlash in
depth of field is reduced to the acceptable value of 2 pm. The the fine adjustment. Using this procedure, a particular instru-
field diameter is in inverse relation to the total magnification, ment can be inspected and the necessary corrections im-
the latter being obtained by multiplying the magnification of the plemented.
individual lenses in the microscope system. Many microscopes
have a fixed intermediate lens which usually adds a factor of
X I,25 or X 1,5.
D.3 Variability of surface profile
When these considerations are taken into account along with
the desire to produce a test method for measuring the surface To obtain a representative value for the surface profile of
profiles of IS0 comparators, it is necessary that standard re- abrasive blast-cleaned structural steel, it is necessary to
quirements be specified in order to obtain figures aligning with average at least 20 maximum peak-to-valley heights h, obtain-
visual and tactile assessments. By controlling the numerical ed by using the procedure described in clause 7. This average,
aperture of the objective lens and the field of view, the known as the mean maximum peak-to-valley height h,,
magnification is indirectly controlled. To meet the requirement minimizes irregularities caused by rogue peaks, cracks, hackles,
for an objective with a numerical aperture not less than 0,5 and etc.
a field of view greater than 0.5 mm diameter, a microscope with
an objective lens of X 20, a numerical aperture of 0.5 and an The standard deviation for a set of 20 peak-to-valley
eyepiece lens of X 10 is typical and provides a total magnifica- measurements that have been carried out correctly is usually
tion of X 200. between 15 % and 25 % of the mean of the measurements.
Thus, a standard deviation greater than 33 % of the mean in-
dicates an unacceptably high variability in the measuring pro-
D.2 Focus movement
cedure or in the test area, and a further set of peak-to-valley
Normal microscopy procedures require the final focusing measurements is to be made to establish whether the initial set
movement to be always made in the same direction. However, of readings was representative (see clause 8).
7
Copyright International Organization for Standardization
Provided by IHS under license with ISO Licensee=Shell Global Solutions International B.V./5924979112
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 01/07/2008 22:29:31 MST
ISO8!503-3:1988(E)
Annex E
When the test method is used to verify the profile of a steel substrate, it is usually impractical to obtain a small sample of the actual
surface whose profile is to be determined. In this case, it is still possible, by examining a replica of the steel surface, to determine the
surface profile.
A replica produces the reverse of the metal surface (that is, the peaks of the steel substrate become the valleys of the replica and the
valleys of the steel become the peaks of the replica), but this reversal does not affect the validity of the measurement methods
described in IS0 8503-4 and this Part of IS0 8503.
A variety of replicating techniques is available including solventless two-component organic polymers that cross-link to give a hard
solid surface. These polymers may have disadvantages in that they do not penetrate into the deepest, sharpest valleys and that
a release agent may be required. They provide, however, a hard enough surface to enable the stylus measurements described in
IS0 8503-4 to be made.
A two-component pigmented silicone rubber product has also been used with success. Its initial viscosity and flexible nature when
cross-linked mean that penetration into re-entrants of grit-blasted profiles, and subsequent removal, is good. Due to its softness,
however, measurement is restricted to the microscope method described in this part of IS0 8503.
Before any replicating technique is used, it should be examined for accuracy by replicating at least five steel surfaces whose profiles
have been determined directly. These steel surfaces should have been prepared by use of abrasive of the same type as that used on
the surface to be tested, and they should have profiles that span the test surface profile range. It is preferable that the profile obtained
from the replica should be within 10 % of that obtained on the steel surfaces.
If a replicating technique is used to determine the surface profile of a substrate, this should be stated when reporting the “mean max-
imum peak-to-valley height”.
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Descriptors : paints, varnishes, substrates, steel products, tests, determination, surface condition, profile criteria, roughness, viso-tactile
comparison specimens, microscopes.
--`,``,````,`,,,,,`,`,,,``,,`,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---