Banking Question-505

1.
a) Why is the understanding of research philosophy essential? How business research can
contribute to effective business decision making.

Understanding research philosophy is essential because it forms the foundation for how research is
conducted and the methods chosen to answer research questions. Research philosophy influences the
researcher's worldview, guiding their approach to collecting and interpreting data. In business research,
this understanding is crucial for several reasons:

1. **Methodological Choices**: Research philosophy shapes the researcher's methodological choices,

such as qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. For example, a positivist research philosophy might
lead to quantitative surveys, while a constructivist philosophy may favor qualitative interviews.

2. **Research Design**: It influences the design of the research study, including the selection of data
collection methods, sampling techniques, and data analysis procedures. Understanding the research
philosophy ensures alignment between the chosen methods and the research goals.

3. **Data Interpretation**: Research philosophy guides how data is interpreted and the meaning
attributed to findings. It helps researchers make sense of the results within the context of their
philosophical perspective.

4. **Research Ethics**: Ethical considerations in business research are influenced by the researcher's
philosophy. Understanding this philosophy helps researchers navigate ethical challenges, such as
informed consent and data privacy, in a manner consistent with their underlying beliefs.

5. **Theoretical Framework**: Research philosophy informs the choice of theoretical frameworks and
models used in business research. Researchers select theories that align with their philosophical stance
to develop hypotheses and guide data analysis.

Regarding how business research contributes to effective business decision-making:

1. **Informed Decision-Making**: Business research provides valuable data and insights that inform
decision-makers about market trends, consumer preferences, and industry dynamics. This information
allows for more informed and data-driven decisions.

2. **Risk Mitigation**: Research helps identify potential risks and uncertainties in business operations.
Decision-makers can develop strategies to mitigate these risks, enhancing the likelihood of successful
outcomes.

3. **Product Development**: Research can guide the development of new products or services by
understanding customer needs and preferences. This reduces the likelihood of launching products that
do not meet market demands.

4. **Competitive Advantage**: Research can uncover unique insights about competitors, allowing
businesses to adapt and gain a competitive edge. It helps identify opportunities to differentiate products
or services.

5. **Resource Allocation**: Business research aids in resource allocation by helping organizations

prioritize investments based on data-supported assessments of market potential and profitability.

1
Banking Question-505

6. **Performance Evaluation**: Research can provide benchmarks and key performance indicators
(KPIs) for evaluating the effectiveness of business strategies. Decision-makers can adjust strategies
based on performance data.

7. **Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty**: Research can assess customer satisfaction and loyalty,
leading to strategies for retaining existing customers and attracting new ones.

8. **Strategic Planning**: Research informs the development of strategic plans, guiding organizations
in setting goals, objectives, and action plans that align with market realities.

In summary, research philosophy underpins the research process and methodology, ensuring alignment
with the researcher's worldview. Business research contributes to effective decision-making by
providing data-driven insights and informed strategies that enhance business performance and
competitiveness in the marketplace. It helps businesses adapt to changing conditions, mitigate risks,
and seize opportunities for growth.

b) Distinguish between an exploratory and a predictive research. Why do you need to

depend on descriptive research too?

**Exploratory Research** and **Predictive Research** serve different purposes in the research
process, and they have distinct characteristics:

**Exploratory Research**:

1. **Purpose**: The primary purpose of exploratory research is to gain a deeper understanding of a

subject when the researcher has limited prior knowledge or when the topic is relatively unexplored. It is
often used at the early stages of research to explore new ideas, concepts, or phenomena.

2. **Methods**: Qualitative methods, such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and content
analysis, are commonly used in exploratory research. These methods allow researchers to gather in-
depth insights and generate hypotheses.

3. **Outcome**: Exploratory research typically results in a better understanding of a topic, the

identification of key variables, and the development of hypotheses or research questions. It does not
aim to make precise predictions or test hypotheses rigorously.

4. **Examples**: Conducting interviews with customers to understand their preferences before

designing a new product or conducting initial observations to explore behaviors in a specific context.

**Predictive Research**:

1. **Purpose**: Predictive research aims to make predictions or forecasts about future events, trends,
or outcomes based on historical data and established relationships. It seeks to test hypotheses and
develop models that can be used for prediction.

2. **Methods**: Quantitative methods, such as regression analysis, machine learning, and time series
analysis, are commonly used in predictive research. These methods involve statistical modeling and
data analysis to predict future outcomes.

2
Banking Question-505

3. **Outcome**: The outcome of predictive research is a model or algorithm that can make predictions
with a certain degree of accuracy. It often involves statistical measures of prediction performance, such
as accuracy, precision, or mean squared error.

4. **Examples**: Using historical sales data to forecast future sales, developing a predictive model to
estimate customer churn, or using weather data to predict future climate patterns.

**Descriptive Research**:

Descriptive research serves a complementary role to both exploratory and predictive research:

1. **Purpose**: Descriptive research focuses on providing a detailed and objective account of a

phenomenon, event, or population. It aims to describe characteristics, behaviors, or trends without
necessarily making predictions or exploring causality.

2. **Methods**: Both qualitative and quantitative methods can be used in descriptive research,
depending on the research questions. Surveys, questionnaires, observations, and statistical analysis are
common methods.

3. **Outcome**: The outcome of descriptive research is a comprehensive and accurate description of

the subject under investigation. It provides a snapshot of the current state or characteristics of a
phenomenon.

**Why Depend on Descriptive Research**:

- **Contextual Understanding**: Descriptive research provides a foundational understanding of a

subject or phenomenon. It helps establish the context for further exploration (exploratory research) or
prediction (predictive research).

- **Data Availability**: Descriptive research often relies on existing data sources, making it cost-
effective and accessible. It can serve as a valuable starting point for research when collecting new data
is challenging.

- **Decision Support**: Descriptive research provides information that decision-makers can use to
make informed choices. It offers insights into current trends and behaviors that can guide strategic
decisions.

In summary, exploratory research explores new or poorly understood topics, predictive research makes
predictions based on historical data, and descriptive research provides a detailed snapshot of a subject.
All three types of research have their place in the research process, with descriptive research often
serving as a crucial foundation for understanding and decision-making.

3
Banking Question-505

2.
a) Provide a succinct overview of the stages involved in the research process.

The research process typically involves several stages, each essential for conducting a systematic and
rigorous investigation. Here's a succinct overview of the key stages:

1. **Identify the Research Problem**:

- Define the research topic or problem you want to investigate.
- Specify the research objectives and questions that guide your study.

2. **Conduct a Literature Review**:

- Review existing research and literature related to your topic.
- Identify gaps, trends, and key findings that inform your research.

3. **Formulate a Research Design**:

- Decide on the research approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods).
- Choose data collection methods and sampling techniques.
- Develop a research plan or protocol.

4. **Collect Data**:
- Gather data through surveys, experiments, interviews, observations, or other methods.
- Ensure data collection is systematic and consistent with your research design.

5. **Analyze Data**:
- Process, clean, and analyze the collected data.
- Use appropriate statistical or qualitative analysis techniques.

6. **Interpret Results**:
- Draw conclusions based on data analysis.
- Discuss the implications of your findings in relation to the research objectives.

7. **Report Findings**:
- Prepare a research report or manuscript.
- Clearly communicate your methodology, results, and conclusions.

8. **Draw Conclusions and Make Recommendations**:

- Summarize the main findings.
- Offer insights and recommendations for further research or practical applications.

9. **Discuss and Reflect**:

- Reflect on the research process, its limitations, and potential biases.
- Consider how the findings contribute to the field and address the research problem.

10. **Cite Sources and Ethical Considerations**:

- Properly cite all sources to give credit and avoid plagiarism.
- Adhere to ethical guidelines and obtain necessary approvals (e.g., ethics approval for human
subjects research).

11. **Publish or Present Findings**:

- Share your research through academic journals, conferences, or presentations.

4
Banking Question-505

- Disseminate findings to relevant audiences and contribute to the scholarly community.

12. **Revise and Further Research**:

- Based on feedback and new insights, revise your research and methodology.
- Consider additional research questions or extensions of your study.

The research process is iterative, meaning that researchers often revisit and refine various stages as they
progress. It's a dynamic and systematic journey aimed at acquiring knowledge, answering questions,
and contributing to the understanding of a particular subject or problem.

b) What issues in the research process can lead to studies deviating from their intended
course or being less effective than they should be? Explain.

Several issues and challenges in the research process can lead to studies deviating from their intended
course or being less effective than they should be. These issues can impact the quality, validity, and
reliability of research outcomes. Here are some common issues and explanations:

1. **Inadequate Research Design**:

- **Explanation**: If the research design is not well-conceived, it can result in a study that lacks
clarity, focus, or appropriateness. Inadequate design decisions can lead to biased data, omitted
variables, or a mismatch between research questions and methodology.

2. **Sampling Biases**:
- **Explanation**: Issues related to sampling, such as non-random selection or underrepresentation
of certain groups, can compromise the generalizability of findings. Biased samples may not accurately
represent the population of interest.

3. **Data Collection Errors**:

- **Explanation**: Errors during data collection, such as poorly designed survey instruments,
ambiguous questions, or data entry mistakes, can introduce inaccuracies into the dataset. These errors
can affect the validity of results.

4. **Sampling and Response Bias**:

- **Explanation**: Sampling and response bias can occur when participants are not selected
randomly or when response rates are low. This can lead to results that are not representative of the
population or are skewed by the characteristics of respondents.

5. **Ethical Concerns**:
- **Explanation**: Ethical issues, such as failing to obtain informed consent, mishandling sensitive
data, or not protecting the privacy of participants, can lead to ethical violations and undermine the
effectiveness of a study.

6. **Data Analysis Mistakes**:

- **Explanation**: Errors in data analysis, including incorrect statistical tests, inappropriate
modeling, or misinterpretation of results, can lead to erroneous conclusions or misrepresentation of
findings.

7. **Publication Bias**:

5
Banking Question-505

- **Explanation**: Publication bias occurs when studies with positive or significant results are more
likely to be published, while studies with null or negative findings are often not published. This can
create a distorted view of the literature.

8. **Lack of Pilot Testing**:

- **Explanation**: Failing to conduct pilot testing of survey instruments or data collection
procedures can result in unanticipated problems during the main study, leading to incomplete or
unreliable data.

9. **Resource Constraints**:
- **Explanation**: Limited time, budget, or access to resources can compromise the scope and
quality of a study. Researchers may have to make compromises that affect the study's effectiveness.

10. **Researcher Bias**:

- **Explanation**: Researchers' own biases, assumptions, or preconceived notions can influence the
study's design, data collection, and interpretation of results. This bias can lead to subjective or skewed
findings.

11. **Changing Circumstances**:

- **Explanation**: External factors, such as unforeseen events, changes in the environment, or
evolving technology, can impact the research process and may require adjustments to the study's
course.

To mitigate these issues and ensure the effectiveness of a research study, researchers should carefully
plan their research, conduct pilot testing, adhere to ethical guidelines, maintain transparency in
reporting, and continually monitor and address potential challenges that may arise during the research
process.

3. a) What does the term Research Design refer to? Contrast the characteristics of cross-
sectional and longitudinal research designs.

**Research Design** refers to the overall plan, structure, and strategy that researchers use to guide
their investigation and collect relevant data in a systematic and organized manner. It is a critical aspect
of the research process that outlines how the research will be conducted, including the research
questions, data collection methods, sampling procedures, and data analysis techniques. A well-designed
research study should align with the research objectives and ensure the validity and reliability of the
findings.

Now, let's contrast the characteristics of two common research designs: **cross-sectional** and
**longitudinal** research:

**Cross-Sectional Research**:
- **Purpose**: Cross-sectional research collects data from a sample of individuals or elements from a
population at a single point in time.
- **Data Collection**: Data is collected once, providing a snapshot of the population's characteristics
or behaviors at that moment.
- **Scope**: It is often used to describe the prevalence or distribution of variables or to compare
different groups at a specific time.

6
Banking Question-505

- **Duration**: Relatively short-term, as data collection occurs only once.

- **Changes Over Time**: Cannot directly capture changes or trends over time in the same individuals
or elements.
- **Comparisons**: Suitable for comparing different groups or subpopulations.
- **Example**: Surveying different age groups to determine their preferred communication tools in
2021.

**Longitudinal Research**:
- **Purpose**: Longitudinal research collects data from the same individuals or elements repeatedly
over an extended period to study changes and trends.
- **Data Collection**: Data is collected at multiple time points, allowing for the tracking of changes
within the same sample.
- **Scope**: It is used to explore changes, developments, or trends over time, including within-subject
variations.
- **Duration**: Typically longer-term, extending over months, years, or even decades.
- **Changes Over Time**: Directly captures changes and developments within the same individuals or
elements.
- **Comparisons**: Suitable for studying individual trajectories and within-subject changes.
- **Example**: Tracking a cohort of students' academic performance from kindergarten through
college graduation to analyze educational trends and individual progress.

In summary, the key distinction between cross-sectional and longitudinal research designs is the timing
of data collection. Cross-sectional research collects data at a single point in time to compare groups or
describe a population, while longitudinal research collects data at multiple time points to track changes
and developments within the same individuals or elements over time. The choice between these designs
depends on the research objectives, the need to study change or stability, and the available resources for
data collection and analysis.

b) Under what circumstances is exploratory research suitable? When should a researcher

opt for formalized studies?

**Exploratory research** and **formalized studies** serve different purposes in the research process,
and the choice between them depends on the research objectives and context. Here's when each is
suitable:

**Exploratory Research**:

1. **Early Stages of Research**: Exploratory research is particularly useful when you are in the early
stages of a research project and need to gain a better understanding of a topic or problem. It helps you
explore ideas, generate hypotheses, and identify key variables.

2. **Lack of Prior Knowledge**: When there is limited prior knowledge or existing literature on a
subject, exploratory research helps researchers gather initial insights and shape research questions.

3. **Complex or Multifaceted Issues**: It is suitable for investigating complex, multifaceted issues

where the relationships between variables are not well understood. Exploratory research allows you to
uncover potential patterns and connections.

7
Banking Question-505

4. **Qualitative Data**: Exploratory research often involves qualitative data collection methods like
interviews, focus groups, or open-ended surveys. These methods are well-suited for exploring diverse
perspectives and experiences.

5. **Generating Hypotheses**: Researchers use exploratory research to generate hypotheses or

research questions that can be tested in later formalized studies.

6. **Pilot Studies**: It can serve as a precursor to pilot studies, helping researchers refine their
research design and data collection instruments.

**Formalized Studies**:

1. **Clear Research Objectives**: Formalized studies are appropriate when you have well-defined
research objectives, specific hypotheses, or research questions that require testing and validation.

2. **Testing Causality**: If your research aims to establish causality or test specific relationships
between variables, formalized studies with controlled experiments or structured surveys are necessary.

3. **Quantitative Analysis**: Formalized studies often involve quantitative data analysis, statistical
testing, and the application of established research methodologies.

4. **Generalization**: When you aim to generalize research findings to a larger population, formalized
studies with carefully designed sampling techniques and statistical analyses are essential.

5. **Comparative Studies**: Formalized studies are suitable for conducting comparative research,
where you systematically compare groups, conditions, or interventions.

6. **Applied Research**: In applied research settings, such as program evaluations or policy

assessments, formalized studies provide rigorous methods to assess the effectiveness of interventions or
policies.

7. **Answering Specific Questions**: When you need precise answers to specific research questions or
when stakeholders require evidence-based decision-making, formalized studies are preferable.

In summary, exploratory research is suitable when you are in the early stages of research, lack prior
knowledge, and need to generate insights and hypotheses. Formalized studies are appropriate when you
have well-defined objectives, specific hypotheses, and a need for rigorous testing, quantification, and
generalizability. The choice between the two approaches depends on the research goals and the stage of
the research process.

4
a) Do you agree that pilot tests are conducted to detect weaknesses in the study's design,
data collection instruments and procedures?

Yes, I agree that pilot tests are conducted to detect weaknesses in a study's design, data collection
instruments, and procedures. Pilot testing is a valuable step in the research process for several reasons:

1. **Identifying Design Flaws**: Pilot tests help researchers identify potential flaws or shortcomings
in their research design. This includes issues related to the research questions, hypotheses, sampling
methods, and overall study structure. By conducting a pilot test, researchers can make necessary

8
Banking Question-505

adjustments to improve the study's overall design.

2. **Evaluating Data Collection Instruments**: Pilot testing allows researchers to assess the
effectiveness of data collection instruments, such as surveys, questionnaires, or interview protocols. It
helps in identifying ambiguities, confusing questions, or issues with wording that may lead to
misunderstandings among participants.

3. **Assessing Procedures**: Researchers can use pilot tests to evaluate the practicality and efficiency
of data collection procedures. This includes assessing the time required to complete surveys or
interviews, the logistics of participant recruitment, and any potential challenges that may arise during
data collection.

4. **Refining Data Analysis Plans**: Pilot tests can also inform decisions about data analysis.
Researchers can test preliminary data analysis methods to ensure they are appropriate for the collected
data and that they will yield meaningful results.

5. **Enhancing Data Quality**: Pilot testing provides an opportunity to uncover and address issues
that might compromise data quality. By identifying and rectifying problems in advance, researchers can
increase the reliability and validity of their data.

6. **Minimizing Participant Burden**: Pilot tests help assess the burden placed on study participants.
Researchers can determine whether the data collection process is too time-consuming or intrusive and
make adjustments to minimize participant burden.

7. **Improving Communication**: If the research involves interactions with participants (e.g.,

interviews or surveys), pilot testing allows researchers to refine their communication and ensure that
participants understand the study's purpose and procedures.

Overall, pilot testing serves as a valuable quality control step in the research process. It helps
researchers fine-tune their research methods and procedures to enhance the overall quality of the study
and increase the likelihood of obtaining valid and reliable results.

b) How does qualitative research differ from quantitative research? Why do many
consider qualitative research as a stepchild of quantitative research?

**Qualitative research** and **quantitative research** are two distinct research approaches with
fundamental differences in their methodologies, data collection, and objectives:

**Qualitative Research**:

1. **Nature of Data**: Qualitative research focuses on collecting non-numerical data, often in the form
of text, images, or narratives. It seeks to understand complex social phenomena and human behaviors
by exploring underlying meanings, perceptions, and experiences.

2. **Data Collection Methods**: Qualitative research employs methods like interviews, focus groups,
participant observation, and content analysis to gather data. Researchers engage with participants in
open-ended conversations to uncover their perspectives and insights.

3. **Data Analysis**: Qualitative data analysis involves interpreting and coding textual or visual data

9
Banking Question-505

to identify patterns, themes, and emerging concepts. It emphasizes context, depth, and rich descriptions.

4. **Research Objectives**: Qualitative research aims to explore, describe, and understand social
phenomena, often with a focus on generating theories or hypotheses. It doesn't seek to generalize
findings to a larger population but rather to provide in-depth insights into specific cases.

**Quantitative Research**:

1. **Nature of Data**: Quantitative research deals with numerical data that can be measured, counted,
and subjected to statistical analysis. It aims to quantify relationships, test hypotheses, and identify
patterns using structured data.

2. **Data Collection Methods**: Quantitative research typically uses structured surveys, experiments,
questionnaires, or statistical databases to collect data. Data collection instruments are standardized to
ensure consistency.

3. **Data Analysis**: Quantitative data analysis involves statistical techniques to summarize, analyze,
and infer patterns or relationships in the data. It relies on numerical measurements and aims for
generalizability to a larger population.

4. **Research Objectives**: Quantitative research is often used to test hypotheses, make predictions,
and establish causal relationships. It aims for generalizability and seeks to provide statistically
significant findings that apply beyond the study sample.

**Why Qualitative Research is Sometimes Seen as a "Stepchild"**:

The perception of qualitative research as a "stepchild" of quantitative research may arise due to
historical and institutional factors, including:

1. **Emphasis on Objectivity**: Quantitative research has historically been associated with a focus on
objectivity, replicability, and quantifiable outcomes. Qualitative research, with its emphasis on
subjectivity and context, has sometimes been viewed as less rigorous.

2. **Dominance in Certain Fields**: Quantitative research has been more prevalent in some
disciplines, such as natural sciences and economics, leading to a bias in favor of quantitative methods
in academia and research institutions.

3. **Funding and Resources**: Research funding and resources have often favored quantitative
studies, which may have led to the perception that qualitative research is less valued.

However, it's important to note that both qualitative and quantitative research have their strengths and
are valuable for different research questions and contexts. In recent years, there has been a growing
recognition of the complementary nature of these approaches, and many researchers now advocate for
mixed-methods research that combines both qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a more
comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena.

5. a) Describe the areas where observation is an important technique to collect data for
research. How can you overcome the weaknesses of observation?

10
Banking Question-505

**Observation** is an important data collection technique in research, particularly in fields where

direct, firsthand data is essential. It involves systematically watching and recording behaviors, events,
or phenomena. Observation can be used in various research areas, including:

1. **Behavioral Research**:
- In psychology and sociology, observation is used to study human behavior, interactions, and social
phenomena. Researchers observe and record behaviors in natural settings or controlled environments.

2. **Ethnographic Research**:
- Anthropologists and ethnographers use participant observation to immerse themselves in a culture
or community to understand its customs, practices, and social structures.

3. **Education Research**:
- In classrooms, researchers may observe teaching methods, student engagement, and classroom
dynamics to study the effectiveness of educational interventions.

4. **Natural Sciences**:
- In biology, ecology, and environmental science, observation is used to study wildlife, ecosystems,
and natural phenomena. Researchers make field observations to collect data on species behavior or
environmental changes.

5. **Market Research**:
- Observational research is employed to understand consumer behavior, such as shopping habits,
product usage, or reactions to advertising.

6. **Healthcare and Medicine**:

- Clinicians and researchers use direct observation to collect clinical data, assess patient symptoms, or
evaluate treatment outcomes.

To overcome the weaknesses of observation, researchers can employ several strategies:

1. **Objectivity and Bias Reduction**:

- Researchers should be aware of their potential biases and strive for objectivity in their observations.
Using structured observation protocols and double-blind techniques can help reduce bias.

2. **Standardized Procedures**:
- Develop standardized observation protocols and checklists to ensure consistency in data collection.
Clear guidelines help maintain reliability.

3. **Inter-Rater Reliability**:
- To enhance reliability, involve multiple observers (inter-rater reliability). Calculate agreement rates
between observers to assess consistency.

4. **Training**:
- Ensure that observers are well-trained and familiar with the research objectives. Training can reduce
errors and improve data quality.

5. **Triangulation**:

11
Banking Question-505

- Combine observation with other data collection methods, such as surveys or interviews, to cross-
validate findings and enhance the validity of results.

6. **Ethical Considerations**:
- Maintain ethical standards by obtaining informed consent when necessary, ensuring privacy and
confidentiality, and respecting cultural norms and sensitivities.

7. **Participant Observer Role**:

- In some cases, researchers may need to adopt a participant observer role, immersing themselves in
the environment being studied. They should carefully manage their dual role to minimize interference.

8. **Use Technology**:
- Employ technology like video recording or data logging devices to capture and store observations
accurately and minimize human error.

9. **Peer Review**:
- Have peers or colleagues review your observational methods and findings to identify potential
biases or errors.

By addressing these considerations, researchers can enhance the validity, reliability, and ethical
soundness of observational research, making it a valuable data collection technique in various research
domains.

b) Describe some important advantages of experimental method. What factors would you
consider
for the execution of a well-planned experiment?
The **experimental method** is a powerful research approach that offers several important advantages
when properly executed:

**Advantages of the Experimental Method**:

1. **Causality**: The experimental method allows researchers to establish causal relationships

between variables. By manipulating one variable (the independent variable) while controlling others,
researchers can determine if changes in the independent variable lead to changes in the dependent
variable.

2. **Control**: Experiments offer a high level of control over the research environment. Researchers
can precisely control the conditions, variables, and treatments, reducing the influence of extraneous
factors.

3. **Replicability**: Well-designed experiments can be replicated by other researchers to test the

reliability and validity of the findings. This contributes to the cumulative nature of scientific
knowledge.

4. **Precision**: Experiments often yield precise, quantitative data that can be analyzed statistically.
This enables researchers to detect small but significant effects.

5. **Hypothesis Testing**: The experimental method is well-suited for testing hypotheses and theories.
Researchers can design experiments to test specific predictions and theories.

12
Banking Question-505

6. **Internal Validity**: Experiments are designed to maximize internal validity, ensuring that changes
in the dependent variable are attributable to the manipulation of the independent variable rather than
confounding factors.

7. **Controlled Conditions**: Researchers can create controlled and standardized conditions,

minimizing the influence of external factors that could affect the results.

To execute a well-planned experiment, researchers should consider several critical factors:

1. **Research Question and Hypotheses**: Clearly define the research question and formulate specific
hypotheses that can be tested through experimentation.

2. **Variables**: Identify the independent variable (the one you manipulate) and the dependent
variable (the one you measure). Control other extraneous variables as much as possible.

3. **Sampling**: Carefully select participants or subjects to ensure they are representative of the
population of interest. Use randomization when applicable to minimize bias.

4. **Experimental Design**: Choose an appropriate experimental design, such as between-subjects

(independent groups) or within-subjects (repeated measures) design, based on the research question.

5. **Random Assignment**: If using a between-subjects design, randomly assign participants to

experimental and control groups to ensure groups are comparable.

6. **Manipulation**: Manipulate the independent variable systematically and consistently across

experimental conditions or groups.

7. **Measurement**: Use valid and reliable measurement instruments to assess the dependent variable.
Ensure that measurements are sensitive to detect changes.

8. **Control Group**: Include a control group that does not receive the treatment or manipulation to
serve as a baseline for comparison.

9. **Data Collection**: Collect data systematically, ensuring that data collection procedures are
consistent across participants and conditions.

10. **Data Analysis**: Choose appropriate statistical tests for data analysis, considering the research
question and type of data.

11. **Ethical Considerations**: Ensure that the experiment adheres to ethical guidelines, including
informed consent, participant privacy, and minimal harm.

12. **Replication**: Consider conducting replications to validate the results and increase the
generalizability of findings.

13. **Data Reporting**: Accurately and transparently report the methodology, results, and statistical
analyses for peer review and future research.

13
Banking Question-505

By carefully addressing these factors, researchers can design and execute well-planned experiments
that provide valuable insights and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their respective
fields.

6. a) How would you determine the number of point in a rating scale? Why is summation
with the Likert scale undesirable in some instances?

Determining the number of points on a rating scale, such as a Likert scale, involves considering several
factors related to the research context, the nature of the construct being measured, and the practicality
of data collection. Here are some considerations when determining the number of points on a rating
scale:

1. **Complexity of the Construct**: Consider the complexity of the construct or attribute you are
measuring. More complex constructs may benefit from a larger number of response options to capture
nuances.

2. **Sensitivity of Measurement**: Determine how sensitive you need the scale to be. If you want to
detect subtle differences, a scale with more response options may be appropriate.

3. **Participant Comfort**: Consider the ease with which participants can use the scale. Too many
response options can overwhelm respondents and lead to unreliable or meaningless responses.

4. **Statistical Analysis**: Think about the statistical methods you plan to use. A scale with more
points may provide more variability in the data, which can be advantageous for some statistical
analyses.

5. **Response Format**: Decide whether you want to use an even or odd number of response options.
An odd number allows for a neutral midpoint, while an even number does not.

6. **Previous Research**: Review existing literature and similar studies to see how other researchers
have designed their rating scales for similar constructs.

7. **Pilot Testing**: Consider conducting pilot testing with a small group of participants to assess the
suitability and understandability of the scale.

Regarding the undesirability of summation with the Likert scale in some instances, there are several
reasons why researchers may choose not to use summation:

1. **Assumption of Interval Data**: Summation assumes that the distances between response options
on the Likert scale are equal (interval data). However, Likert scale data are often treated as ordinal,
meaning the distances between options are not equal. Summation may not be appropriate when the
assumption of interval data is violated.

2. **Loss of Information**: Summation collapses the multi-point scale into a single score, potentially
losing information about the distribution of responses. This can make it difficult to distinguish between
respondents who chose different response options for different reasons.

3. **Misleading Precision**: Summation can give the impression of greater precision than is
warranted. For example, summing responses on a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5) yields a score between 5

14
Banking Question-505

and 25, implying a level of precision that may not exist.

4. **Non-Normality**: Summated Likert scale scores may not follow a normal distribution, which can
affect the appropriateness of certain statistical tests.

In cases where summation is deemed undesirable, researchers may opt for alternative methods of
analysis, such as item response theory (IRT), factor analysis, or non-parametric statistics, to more
appropriately handle Likert scale data without making unwarranted assumptions about the measurement
properties of the scale.

b) What should sound measurement pass the test of validity, reliability, and practicality?
State the reasons for which stratified and cluster sampling are used.

Sound measurement in research should indeed pass the tests of **validity**, **reliability**, and
**practicality**:

1. **Validity**:
- **Reason**: Validity ensures that a measurement accurately assesses the specific construct or
attribute it is intended to measure. It answers the question, "Does the measurement tool measure what
it's supposed to measure?"
- **Importance**: Without validity, the data collected may not accurately represent the construct of
interest, leading to incorrect conclusions and unreliable results. Researchers must establish content,
construct, and criterion validity to ensure the measurement's accuracy.

2. **Reliability**:
- **Reason**: Reliability assesses the consistency and stability of measurement over time and across
different conditions. It answers the question, "Is the measurement tool producing consistent results?"
- **Importance**: If a measurement is not reliable, it is difficult to trust the results and draw
meaningful conclusions. Researchers must ensure that their measurement tool yields consistent results
to increase the credibility of their findings.

3. **Practicality**:
- **Reason**: Practicality considers the feasibility and efficiency of using a measurement tool in a
research context. It addresses questions like, "Is the measurement tool easy to administer? Is it cost-
effective?"
- **Importance**: A practical measurement tool is essential because it affects the ease of data
collection, the resources required, and the ability to conduct research efficiently. Researchers need to
balance the need for precise measurement with the practical constraints of their study.

**Stratified Sampling** and **Cluster Sampling** are two common sampling techniques used in
research for specific reasons:

1. **Stratified Sampling**:
- **Reasons**:
- To ensure representation: Stratified sampling is used when the population can be divided into distinct
subgroups or strata that are expected to exhibit variations in the variable of interest. By sampling

15
Banking Question-505

proportionally from each stratum, researchers ensure that each subgroup is represented in the sample.
- To improve precision: It can lead to more precise estimates, especially when there are substantial
differences between subgroups. By treating each stratum as a separate sample, researchers can account
for variations within and between strata.
- To address research questions: Some research questions may specifically require the examination of
subgroups within a population, making stratified sampling the appropriate choice.

2. **Cluster Sampling**:
- **Reasons**:
- To reduce costs and logistics: Cluster sampling is useful when it's impractical or costly to collect data
from individual elements within a population. Instead of sampling individuals, clusters (e.g., schools,
neighborhoods) are randomly selected, and all individuals within the chosen clusters are included in the
sample.
- To address spatial considerations: In cases where elements within clusters are spatially distributed, or
when geographic regions are of interest, cluster sampling simplifies data collection by focusing on
entire clusters.
- To accommodate limited resources: Cluster sampling can be more cost-effective, particularly when
conducting large-scale surveys or studies where it's challenging to reach individual respondents
scattered across a wide area.

In both stratified and cluster sampling, the goal is to improve the efficiency and representativeness of
the sample, taking into account practical considerations and research objectives. These sampling
techniques allow researchers to make valid and reliable inferences about the larger population of
interest.

16