Flash Memory Statement
Flash Memory Statement
I stand before you today to address a critical decision that Flash Memory is currently facing. My
discussion will center around the strategic direction of the company. My role here is to provide
an extensive analysis of the available options and their financial implications, enabling you, the
esteemed board members, to make an informed decision that aligns with our long-term goals.
Context
Flash Memory is renowned for its expertise in the production and design of Solid State Drives
(SSDs), a segment that constitutes a significant 80% of the company total revenue. However, the
SSD market presents a unique challenge due to its susceptibility to rapid technological
advancements by competitors, resulting in a short shelf life for these products. This places a
and development to stay competitive. Despite these efforts, the product's market relevance
remains limited.
Financial Challenge
To support our current production model, we have been relying on bank loans and factoring a
substantial 90% of our accounts receivables. It is essential to highlight that, should our bank
notes payable approach the 70% limit, our bank will no longer be able to sustain our operational
In light of these challenges, we are now considering the possibility of diversifying into a new
product line. This expansion brings forth several crucial questions, primarily pertaining to the
financing of the substantial investments and expenditures required. Diversification into a new
product line offers the potential to mitigate the risks associated with the volatile SSD market
Financing Options
The first option involves securing additional funding from the factoring division of Flash's
commercial bank. This option leverages our existing relationship with the bank and may offer
competitive terms.
The second option encompasses selling 300,000 shares of common stock at a price of $23.00 per
share. This method allows us to raise capital from the market, potentially attracting new
The third and final option involves relying solely on internal reinvestments from the company's
earnings. This approach retains full ownership but may limit the pace of our expansion due to
financial constraints.
Financial Analysis
these options. This analysis will encompass the projection of detailed income statements and
balance sheets for the years 2010, 2011, and 2012. We will base these forecasts on the key
assumptions provided in exhibit 3, tailored to the respective funding source. This will include a
detailed breakdown of revenue, expenses, and cash flow projections for each option.
Calculating WACC
To evaluate the financial feasibility of each option, we will calculate the Weighted Average Cost
of Capital (WACC) in a more comprehensive manner. This critical metric necessitates the
determination of the cost of debt and the cost of equity, including a detailed explanation of the
underlying components such as risk-free rates, credit spreads, and market rates of return.
Where:
analysis. NPV aids in assessing the potential return on investment, taking into account detailed
cash flows, discount rates, and the timing of these cash flows.
NPV = R / (1 + i)^t
Where:
Decision Criteria
Ultimately, our decision will be based on a comprehensive comparison of each option's impact
on earnings per share, return on equity, interest coverage ratio, and notes payable for the coming
years. Additionally, we will explore the implications of each option on our balance sheet, debt-