Communication Model
Communication Model
Introduction
A model is widely used to depict any idea, thought or a concept in a simpler way through
diagrams, pictorial representations etc. Models go a long way in making the understanding of
any concept easy and clear. Through a model one can easily understand a process and draw
conclusions from it. In simpler words a model makes the learning simple.
Discussion
Communication Models
5 Models of Communication
● Aristotle Model of Communication.
● Berlo's Model of Communication.
● Shannon and Weaver Model of Communication
● Schramm's Model of Communication.
● Helical Model of Communication.
Aristotle Model of Communication
Aristotle was the first to take an initiative and design the communication model.
The speaker must be very careful about his selection of words and content in this model
of communication. He should understand his target audience and then prepare his speech.
Making eye contact with the second party is again a must to create an impact among the
listeners. Let us again go through the first example. The politician must understand the needs of
the people in his constituency like the need of a shopping mall, better transport system, safety of
girls etc. and then design his speech. His speech should address all the above issues and focus on
providing the solutions to their problems to expect maximum votes from them. His tone and
pitch should also be loud and clear enough for the people to hear and understand the speech
properly. Stammering, getting nervous in between of a conversation must be avoided. Voice
modulations also play a very important role in creating the desired effect. Blank expressions,
confused looks and similar pitch all through the speech make it monotonous and nullify its
effect. The speaker should know where to lay more stress on, highlight which words to influence
the listeners.
One will definitely purchase the mobile handset from that store where the sales man gives
an impressive demo of the mobile. It depends on the sales man what to speak and how to speak
in a manner to influence the listeners so that they respond to him in a way he actually wants i.e.
purchase the handset and increase his billing.
The Aristotle model of communication is the widely accepted and the most common
model of communication where the sender sends the information or a message to the receivers to
influence them and make them respond and act accordingly. Aristotle model of communication is
the golden rule to excel in public speaking, seminars, lectures where the sender makes his point
clear by designing an impressive content, passing on the message to the second part and they
simply respond accordingly. Here the sender is the active member and the receiver is passive
one.
Attitudes – This includes attitudes towards the audience, subject and towards oneself. For
example, for the student, the attitude is to learn more and for teachers, it is to help teach.
Knowledge– Communicating also means that the person needs to be knowledgeable about the
subject or topic. For e.g. a teacher needs to know about the subject in detail that he or she teaches
so that they can communicate properly such that the students understand here.
Note: It refers, not to the general knowledge, but to the knowledge of the subject that the person
is communicating and their familiarity with it.
Social system – The social system includes the various aspects of society like values, beliefs,
culture, religion and a general understanding of society. It is where the communication takes
place.
For example, classrooms differ from country to country just like people’s behaviors and how
they communicate, etc.
Note: We can communicate only to the extent that the social system allows. When we
communicate, we take the social system into account.
Culture: Culture of a particular society also comes under the social system.
According to this model, people can communicate only if the above requirements are met
in the proper or adequate proportion.
Encoder: The sender of the message, from where the message originates, is referred to as the
encoder. So the source encodes the message here.
Message Content – The body of a message, from the beginning to the end, comprises its
content. For example, whatever the class teacher teaches in the class, from beginning to end, is
the content of the message.
Elements – It includes various things like language, gestures, body language, etc. They
constitute all the elements of a particular message. Any content is accompanied by some
elements.
Treatment – It refers to the packing of the message and the way in which the message is
conveyed or the way in which it is passed on or delivered.
Note: When there is too much treatment, communication will not go smoothly.
Structure– The structure of the message refers to how it is arranged; the way people structure
the message into various parts.
Note: Message is the same, but if the structure is not properly arranged then the receiver will not
understand the message.
Code– The code of the message refers to the means through which it is sent and in what form. It
could be, for example, language, body language, gestures, music, etc. Even culture is a code.
Through this, people give and receive messages and communication takes place.
Note: Only when the code is clear, the message will be clear. The wrong usage may lead to
misinterpretation.
Channel– It refers to the five sense organs. The following are the five senses:
Hearing
Seeing
Touching
Smelling
Tasting
Tasting : The tongue is a muscular organ used in the act of eat and taste food. For example, while
a food is being shared, the communication can happen regarding its taste.
Note: Despite not mentioning a medium, we need to assume that as communication is taking
place, channels can be any of the 5 senses or combination.
Decoder : The person who receives the message and decodes it is referred to a decoder.
Receiver: The receiver needs to think all the contents and elements of the source, so as to
communicate/responds to sender effectively.
Berlo’s model believes that for effective communication to take place, the source and the
receiver need to be on the same level. Only then communication will happen or take place
properly. Hence, the source and the receiver should be similar.
For example, if the communication skill of the source is good, then the receiver should have
equally good listening skills.
It cannot be said that the receiver does not receive the whole message because even
though he may receive it, but may not be able to interpret its meaning. For effective
communication, the source and the receiver need to be on the same level.
Note: Self-image differs from person to person. For communication, the person should consider
the receiver, speak accordingly and give them what they need.
Criticism of Berlo’s SMCR model of communication:
There is a lack of feedback. The effects are practically unknown.
It does not mention the barriers to communication.
There is no room for noise.
It is a rather complex model.
It is a linear model of communication.
It requires people to be on the same level for effective communication to happen. However,
that rarely happens in everyday life.
The main drawback of the model is that it omits the usage of sixth sense as a channel of
communication, which is an asset to human beings (thinking, understanding, analyzing etc.)
Shannon and Weaver Model of Communication
Shannon and Weaver model is the most popular model of communication and is widely accepted
all over the world.
Let us first go through the following example to understand the model better.
‘Peter is working as Vice president - Marketing with a reputed multinational firm. He is currently
heading Mike who in turn is taking care of a small team. Peter wanted Mike to prepare an
exhaustive report on marketing strategies which can be employed to achieve the goals of the
organization. He also wanted a detailed study on the competitor’s activity by end of the day.
While he was speaking, the company peon interrupted to take the lunch order. Finally when
Mike got the complete information, he in turn delegated the responsibility to his team members.
He tried his level best to convey what Peter actually expected his team to prepare. At the end of
the day, the team did prepare the report and submitted to Peter but there were few errors which
they rectified later on.’
Let us now understand the example in a more detailed away.
Who is Peter ?
Peter is actually the person who thought of preparing the detailed report for better output of the
organization. He is actually the one from whom the thought came. It was Peter’s brain who came
up with this idea of preparing marketing strategies for the organization. Thus, Peter is actually
the source of information.
Had Peter kept the idea in his mind only without sharing it with his team the organization would
have never been benefited out of it. It is very important for the individual to share his ideas as
well as information with others to make the best possible use of the information. Do you think,
Mike and his team would have come to know about Peter’s idea if he had stored it in his brain
only? Obviously NO. Peter had to convert his thoughts into words and bring out the information
through his mouth. Here mouth is actually working as a transmitter which helps in transmitting
the information, message from the brain to the mouth after carefully putting the thought into
words. Peter spoke about some reports which he wanted from his team, the words or Peter’s
voice is actually the signal being sent to Mike about what he is expected to do. Without signal or
without content how will Mike know what he is supposed to do? Go through the example once
again. The conversation was interrupted by the peon who came for the lunch order. In the same
way signals get interrupted by various noises and distractions while traveling from the sender
and finally reaching to the recipient. Horns at crowded streets, hustle bustle of the market place,
babies wailing, people screaming are all various types of noises which get coupled with the
signal or in other words the information. Finally Mike could gather all the information from
Peter after ignoring what the peon spoke and downloaded it to his team who were supposed to
prepare the report.
Shannon and weaver model simply proposes that a message actually originates from the person
who gets the thought or has the information. The sender is also called the Source of information
or the Information Source. The information then gets transmitted from the brain to the mouth and
comes out as a signal which then reaches the recipient after joining hands with several noises and
other disturbances. The recipient then further passes on the message to its final destination or
other minds of other individuals.
Concepts in Shannon Weaver Model
Sender (Information source) – Sender is the person who makes the message, chooses the channel
and sends the message.
Encoder (Transmitter) –Encoder is the sender who uses machine, which converts message into
signals or binary data. It might also directly refer to the machine.
Channel –Channel is the medium used to send message.
Decoder (Receiver) – Decoder is the machine used to convert signals or binary data into message
or the receiver who translates the message from signals.
The transmission error is the noise in this case. The feedback lets the businessman know
that the message reached incomplete. The receiver gets the chance to get the full message only
after his feedback.
Cite this article as: businesstopia, "Shannon and Weaver Model Of Communication," in
Businesstopia, January 6, 2018,
https://www.businesstopia.net/communication/shannon-and-weaver-model-communication
Sam kept mum and did not respond and hence the communication between Sam and
Jennifer was not complete. If Sam was not interested for the movie, he could have responded or
given the feedback to Jennifer about his unwillingness. According to Schramm’s model,
whenever the information reaches the recipient, it becomes his responsibility to give the
feedback and let him know if he has downloaded the message in exactly the same manner the
speaker wanted. If he is not clear with anything or has any doubts, it must be cleared with the
speaker. Thus when the speaker conveys any message to the listener, the listener, decodes the
message and once again passes the message to the speaker after understanding it and completing
the full circle.
Sender
M↓ ↑M
Receiver
M - Stands for message
Schramm believed that an individual’s knowledge, experience and cultural background
also play an important role in communication. Individuals from diverse cultures, religion or
background tend to interpret the message in different ways.
Billy to Servant - “Please bring something hot for me to drink as I am suffering from sore
throat.”
The servant brought him a glass of lukewarm water but Billy actually wanted a cup of hot
chocolate coffee. Hence different interpretation by the servant. He was not on the common
grounds with Billy and failed to understand his master’s information. It was neither Billy’s the
servant’s fault but actually the differences in both their backgrounds which was to blame.
In 1967, Frank Dance has proposed the communication model called Dance's Helix
Model for a better communication process. The name helical comes from “Helix” which means
an object having a three-dimensional shape like that of a wire wound uniformly around a
cylinder or cone.
Helical Model of Communication in emphasized the difficulties of communication. Frank
Dance uses the form of a Helix to describe communication process. He developed this theory
based on a simple helix which gets bigger and bigger as it moves or grows. The main
characteristic of helical model of communication is that it is evolutionary.
Frank Dance explains the communication process based on this Helix structure and
compares it with communication. In the Helix structure, the bottom or starting is very small then
it’s gradually moves upward in a back and forth circular motion which form the bigger circle in
the top and its still moves further. The whole process takes some time to reach. As like helix, the
communication process starts very slowly and defined small circle. Communicators share
information only with small portion of themselves to their relationships.
References: