S&S - Week 6
S&S - Week 6
• In analogy with the results in D-T systems, here we will obtain a complete
characterization of C-T LTI system in terms of its unit impulse response.
LTI
The C-T Unit Impulse
lim 𝛿∆ (𝑡)
∆→#
lim 𝑢∆ (𝑡)
∆→#
%
• Nevertheless, lim ∫$% 𝛿∆ 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 can be defined, which is 1. Thus, for
∆→#
%
convenience, we write ∫$% 𝛿 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 = 1
Sampling Property of C-T Unit Impulse
% %
) 𝑥(𝑡)𝛿∆ 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 ≈ ) 𝑥 0 𝛿∆ 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑥(0)
$% $%
lim lim
∆→# ∆→#
%
) 𝑥 𝑡 𝛿 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑥(0)
$%
%
) 𝑥 𝑡 𝛿 𝑡 − 𝑡# 𝑑𝑡 = 𝑥(𝑡# )
$%
2.2.1 The Representation of C-T Signals in
Terms of Impulses
• Derivation 1: Piecewise linear (staircase) approximation of x(t)
%
𝑥 𝑡 = ) 𝑥 𝜏 𝛿 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
$%
• In the case x(t) = u(t),
• Derivation 2.
% % %
) 𝑥 𝜏 𝛿 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 = ) 𝑥 𝑡 𝛿 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 = 𝑥(𝑡) ) 𝛿 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 = 𝑥(𝑡)
$% $% $%
If the system is TI
% %
𝑥 𝑡 = ) 𝑥 𝜏 𝛿 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 𝑦 𝑡 = ) 𝑥 𝜏 ℎ 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
$% LTI system $%
= 𝑥 𝑡 ∗ 𝛿(𝑡) = 𝑥 𝑡 ∗ ℎ(𝑡)
x(t) is a weighted sum of shifted impulses y(t) is a weighted sum of shifted impulse responses
𝑦) 𝑛 𝑦* 𝑛
commutative property
associative property
𝑦[𝑛] = (𝑥[𝑛] ∗ ℎ* 𝑛 ) ∗ ℎ) 𝑛 )
• In the series connection of LTI systems, switching the order of cascade does not change the overall response.
: A characteristic particular to LTI systems, not applied to linear systems (Ex. Problem 2.51)
Problem 2.51
2.3.4 LTI Systems with and without Memory
y = x ∗ ℎ = ℎ ∗ x = J ℎ 𝑘 𝑥[𝑛 − 𝑘]
:;$%
2.3.5 Invertibility of LTI Systems
• Example 2.11
as
Example 2.12
Find the inverse of
Check:
2.3.6 Causality for LTI Systems
% =
•𝑦 𝑡 = ∫$% 𝑥 𝜏 ℎ 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 = ∫$% 𝑥 𝜏 ℎ 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
% %
• = ∫$% ℎ 𝜏 𝑥 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏 = ∫# ℎ 𝜏 𝑥 𝑡 − 𝜏 𝑑𝜏
In casual systems
• Suppose ∑:
789: ℎ 𝑘 = ∞, and choose one input x[n] that is not bounded
0, 𝑖𝑓 ℎ 𝑛 = 0
such as 𝑥 𝑛 = 6 ;[<] and 𝑥 𝑛 ≤ 𝐵 = 1
, 𝑖𝑓 ℎ[𝑛] ≠ 0
|; < |
𝑦 𝑛 = ∑:
789: ℎ 𝑘 𝑥 𝑛 − 𝑘 = ∑ :
789: ℎ 𝑘 = ∞ : unstable
2.3.8 The Unit Step Response of an LTI System
ℎ 𝑛 = 𝑠 𝑛 − 𝑠[𝑛 − 1]