Using KT and KQ For Design
Using KT and KQ For Design
these notes are landscape as plots are usually shown in that mode
we have seen in general the development of the Wageningen B series. The performance curves are available either in chart form or can be generated from polynomials:
regression coeff. Re=2*10^6 polynomial representation
use in design
A typical design problem calls for designing a propeller that will provide the required thrust at a given speed of advance. These parameters result
from applying thrust deduction and wake fraction to resistance and ship velocity respectively. Design will imply selecting a P/D from a B-series
plot that will maximize open water efficiency.
For now we will arbitrarily pick a number of blades and expanded area ratio. Later we will address the criteria in their selection. Reviewing the non-dimensional forms of the parameters associated with thrust and speed: VA T we have independent variables n and D. Normally one of these is determined by other criteria, e.g. maximum diameter KT = J= 2 4 n D by hull form, or n by the propulsion train design, so we will look at two cases, one in which D is fixed - determine n, n D and the other where n is fixed determine D
case 1
given:
VA , T, D
T n D
2 4
n D VA
T D VA
2 2
this says that propeller (full scale and model) must match this ratio which is a constant determined by T, VA, D and we can plot a curve of KT vs J2 and determine the points (values of J) for which K T vs J for a given P/D match. Kt( J) = constant J
2
Kt_over_J_sq :=
T D VA
2 2
the design point for a particular propeller (B.n.nn) i.e. n is determined from the value of J that satisfies:
9/12/2006
Kt_over_J_sq := 0.544
2
what n i.e. J will satisfy the relationship for a B 5.75 propeller with P/D -1.0 select using B_series z := 5 EAR := 0.75 P_over_D := 1.0
Kt_design ( J) := Kt_over_J_sq J
determine intersection
1 0.9
0.8
0.6
0.5 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
Kt 10 * Kq efficiency Kt = constant*J^2 intersection 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6
intersection occurs at
JJ = 0.64
so ...
n=
VA JJ D
9/12/2006
selection of the optimum n for this B z.EAR propeller is a matter of comparing similar curves for a range of P/D and choosing the maximum open water efficiency o B series z=5 EAR = 0.75 say ....
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Kt, Kq*10, efficiency 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
busy plot of Kt, Kq, o and Kt = constant * J^2. see breakdown below. P/D not labeled but ~ J at Kt = 0
9/12/2006
intersection solution
plot with only Kt but vertical lines at J for Kt/J^2 = Kt to show points which satisfy the design requirements
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
P/D = 0.6
9/12/2006
P/D = 0.8
P/D = 1.0
P/D = 1.2
P/D = 1.4
note the o at each J intersection and select the maximum (P/D curves not well labeled, P/D ~ = J at K T=0. left to right lowest to highest
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
Kt, efficiency
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
P_over_D_ans = 1
so ...
n=
9/12/2006
case 2
given:
VA , T, n
T n D
2 4
n D VA
2 4
VA
this says that propeller (full scale and model) must match this ratio which is a constant determined by T, VA, n and we can plot a curve of KT vs J4 and determine the points (values of J) for which K T vs J for a given P/D match.
Kt_over_J_4 :=
T D VA
2 2
Kt_over_J_4 := 0.544
Kt_design( J) := Kt_over_J_4 J
z := 5
EAR := 0.75
Kt( J) = constant J
4
the design point for a particular propeller (B.n.nn) i.e. n is determined from the value of J that satisfies:
since the process is identical to case 1, only the final result is shown
intersection solution
9/12/2006
note the o at each J intersection and select the maximum (P/D curves not well labeled, P/D ~ = J at K T=0. left to right lowest to highest)
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
Kt, efficiency
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
P_over_D_ans = 1
and ...
D=
9/12/2006