0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

PPT7

The document discusses approximation methods for solving the Schrodinger equation including the variation method and perturbation method. The variation method uses a trial wavefunction to obtain an upper bound for the ground state energy. The perturbation method treats part of the Hamiltonian as a small perturbation and solves order by order. Examples are given for the particle in a box, harmonic oscillator, and helium atom.

Uploaded by

Abraham Asefa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

PPT7

The document discusses approximation methods for solving the Schrodinger equation including the variation method and perturbation method. The variation method uses a trial wavefunction to obtain an upper bound for the ground state energy. The perturbation method treats part of the Hamiltonian as a small perturbation and solves order by order. Examples are given for the particle in a box, harmonic oscillator, and helium atom.

Uploaded by

Abraham Asefa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

7.

Techniques of Approximations
7.1 Introduction
 The Schrödinger equation cannot be solved exactly for systems
with inter-electronic repulsion term.
 For such systems we must resort to some approximation
methods.
7.2 The He Atom
The Schrödinger equation is:
ħ2 2 ħ2 ħ2
𝛻 − 𝛻12 − 𝛻22  𝑅, 𝑟1, 𝑟2
2𝑀 2𝑚e 2𝑚e
2𝑒2 2𝑒2 𝑒2
+ − − +  R, r1, r2
4𝜋𝜀o 𝑅 − 𝑟1 4𝜋𝜀o 𝑅 − 𝑟2 4𝜋𝜀o 𝑟1 − 𝑟2
= 𝐸 𝑅, 𝑟1, 𝑟2

1
Approximation methods

R, r1, r2 = position of the helium nucleus, and the two electrons,


respectively
M, me = mass of the nucleus and the electron
2 ,21, 22 Laplacian operator with respect to the position of the
nucleus, and the two electrons, respectively
M >> me
 The nucleus is approximated to be fixed relative to the motion of
the electrons.
ħ2 2 2 2𝑒2 1 1
− ∇ +∇  𝑟1, 𝑟2 − +  r1, r2
2me 1 2 4𝜋𝜀o 1𝑟 𝑟 2
𝑒 2
+  = 𝐸 𝑟1, 𝑟2
4𝜋𝜀o 𝑟1 − 𝑟2 r1, r2

𝑒2 is called the inter-electronic repulsion term.


4𝜋𝜀𝑜 𝑟1−𝑟2
2
Approximation methods

 If the inter-electronic term were not there,


 the total Hamiltonian operator would be the sum of the two
Hamiltonian operators of two hydrogen atoms.
 the total energy would be the sum of the energies of the two
individual hydrogen atoms, and
 the wave function would be a product of two hydrogen atomic
orbitals.
 There are two major approaches of approximations, the variation
method and the perturbation method.
7.3. The Variation Method
 Applicable to systems for which the wavefunctions for the systems
can be guessed.
 The method allows to obtain an approximation to the ground sate
energy.
3
Approximation methods

 For an arbitrary system, the ground-state wave function 1 and


energy E1 satisfy the Schrӧdinger equation.

H  1  E1 1

Multiply from the left by 1* and integrate over all space, d, to
obtain

  H  d
*
1 1
E1 
  d
*
1 1

Substitute any other non-normalized function o for 1 and


calculate the corresponding energy

  H  d *

E 
   d
*
4
Approximation methods

The variational principle:

E  E1

The equality holds only if  = o, the exact wave function.


 The variational principle says that we can calculate an upper
bound to Eo by using any trial function we wish.

  H  d  E
*

   d
* 1

 The smaller the value of the variation integral, the better the
approximation to the lowest energy will be.

Example: Devise a trial variation function for the particle in a one-


dimensional box of length a.
5
Approximation methods

Solution:
Let  = x(a – x) be the variation wavefunction.
Boundary condition:  = 0 at x  0 and x  a. Inside the box   0.
2 2

H  d 2

2m dx

   
a  a
2 2 d
2
 2a3
0  Hdx   2m 0 ax  x dx 2 ax  x dx  6m
* 2

a a
a5
0   dx  0 x  a  x  dx  30
* 2 2

a 

  H  dx
*

 2 a 3 30 5 2
0
a
 
6m a 5 a 2 m
  dx
 *

6
Approximation methods

5 2
2
 Eo
a m
5h 2 h2
Therefore, 2 2 
4 a m 8ma 2
 5 1
% error   2    8 100  1.3%
 4 8

 The approximation is acceptable.


Exercise: Consider a one dimensional harmonic oscillator.
Boundary condition:   0 as x  .
Let:   e  cx 2

where c is a variational parameter.


Determine the approximate energy, E.
7
Approximation methods

7.4. The perturbation Method


 The method is suitable for a system which differs only slightly
from the one whose exact solution is known (unperturbed
system)
 The perturbation may be time independent or time dependent.
 Consider a system with a time – independent Hamiltonian
operator which can be solved using the Schrödinger equation:

H o  n( o )  En( o ) n( o )

Where H 0 stands for unperturbed system
 Consider a system with a Hamiltonian operator for which the
Schrödinger equation cannot be solved for the eignfunction and
for the eignvalue.
8
Approximation methods


H  n  En n

Example:
For a harmonic oscillator
 2 2
 d 1 2
Ho   2
 kx
2m dx 2
For anharmonic oscillator
 2 d 2 1 2
H  kx  cx 3
 dx 4

2m dx 2 2

Where H stands for the perturbed system.
 If c and d are small, the wavefunction and the eignvalue of the
two Hamiltonian are very similar.

9
Approximation methods

The difference between the two Hamiltonians is called perturbation

Hence the Hamiltonian for the perturbed system is:


   o

H ' HH
  o 
H H H'

For the above case, the perturbation for harmonic/anharmonic


system is cx3 + dx4.

 The eignfunctions and the eighvalue of a perturbed system must


be related to that of unperturbed system.
 
o 
Let H  H   H '

10
Approximation methods

Let
 n( o ) = wavefunction for the unperturbed level
 n = wavefunction for the perturbed level
En( o )
= energy level of the unperturbed system
En = energy level of the perturbed system

 o 

H n   H   H '  n  En n
 
 n   n(o)   n(1)   2 n(2)  ... k n( k )

En  En(o)   En(1)   2 En(2)   ( k ) En( k )

En( k ) and n( k ) are kth order corrections

11
Approximation methods

Solution
First order energy correction term

E (1)
n   ( o )*
m H ' n( o ) d

 Hence the first order correction to the energy is found by


averaging the perturbation over the unperturbed wavefunction.
Letting  = 1

En  En(o)  En(1)

En  E (o)
n   ( o )*
m H ' n( o ) d

12
Approximation methods

First order wavefunction correction:


 H ' n( o ) d
( o )*

 n   n( o )    m( o )
m

m n Em(0)  En(0)

 The wavefunction is summed over all the unperturbed states

Exercise: Apply the perturbation and variation methods for the


ground state of a helium atom.
Solution:

   h2 ze 2 h2 ze 2
H  H 1 H 2   2 1 
2
 2 2 
2

8 m 4 o r1 8 m 4 o r2

13
Approximation methods

Consider the interelectronic repulsion term, e2 /4or12, to be the


perturbation.
For the first order perturbation,

where j = 1 or 2 (to mean electron 1 and electron 2)

14
Approximation methods

Integration result

In units of ,

Letting Z = 2, E = -2.75
 The experimental result is - 2.9033.
 first-order correction gives a result that is about 5% in error

15
Approximation methods

Variation method
Let the trial function be

where j = 1 or 2.
Let the normalized trial function be o
Use Z as a variational constant

where

16
Approximation methods

Solution

In units of ,

If E(Z) is minimized with respect to Z, Zmin = 27/16.


Back substitution gives:

 It is in good agreement with the experimental result of - 2.9033.


 The value of Z that minimizes E can be interpreted as an effective
nuclear charge.

17

You might also like