Introduction
Introduction
1
CE 6115: Advanced Theory and
Design of Steel Structures
2
What is Steel?
4
Effect of Carbon percentage on Steel
Properties
5
Mechanical Properties of Structural Steels
6
Mechanical Properties of Structural
Steels
7
Mechanical Properties of Structural Steels
o Yield strength is usually taken to be that stress which
leaves the specimen with a permanent set of 0.2% when
specimen is unloaded or stress corresponding to 0.5%
elongation (strain)
8
Mechanical properties of
structural steel
Stiffness: The resistance of structural
component to deformation.
• Material
• Length
• X-Section
9
Mechanical properties of
structural steel
Stiffness: Variation with Geometry and Material.
10
Mechanical properties of
structural steel
Stiffness: Variation with Geometry and Material.
11
Mechanical properties of
structural steel
Strength: The max load which a structure or
structural component can resist.
12
Mechanical properties of
structural steel
13
Mechanical properties of
structural steel
Toughness: The ability of a structure or
structural component to absorb energy.
Materials known to be very tough are stainless steels and
titanium alloys. Materials known to be very fragile (the
opposite of tough) are ceramics such as glasses or
porcelain.
14
Mechanical properties of
structural steel
17
Advantages of Steel as Structural
Material
Its great strength, uniformity, light weight, ease
of use, and many other desirable properties
makes material of choice for numerous
structures such as steel bridges, high rise
buildings towers and other structures
18
Advantages of Steel as Structural
Material
19
Advantages of Steel as Structural
Material
20
Disadvantages of Steel as Structural
Material
21
Disadvantages of Steel as Structural
Material
22
Disadvantages of Steel as Structural
Material
23
Disadvantages of Steel as Structural
Material
24
Design Philosophies
26
Limit States
27
Limit States
Strength Limit
States:
• Flexure • Fatigue
• Torsion • Settlement
• Shear • Bearing
28
Limit States
29
Limit States
Special Limit States:
Damage or collapse in extreme
earthquakes.
Structural effects of fire, explosions, or
vehicular collisions.
30
Limit States
31
Design Considerations
33
Design Considerations
34
Design Considerations
35
Design Considerations
36
Allowable Stress Design
(ASD)
37
Allowable Stress Design
(ASD)
• This is equivalent to:
FOS = Resistance, R/ Effect of load, Q
= fy/0.5fy
=2
38
Allowable Stress Design
(ASD)
Since the specifications set limit on the
stresses, it became allowable stress
design (ASD).
39
Allowable Stress Design
(ASD)
Mathematical Description of ASD
Rn
Qi
Rn = Resistance or Strength of the component being
designed
42
Shortcomings of ASD
43
Load and Resistance Factor
Design (LRFD)
To overcome the deficiencies of ASD,
the LRFD method is based on:
Strength of Materials
It consider the variability not only in
resistance but also in the effects of
load.
It provides measure of safety related to
probability of failure.
44
Load and Resistance Factor
Design (LRFD)
Safety in the design is obtained by specifying that the reduced
Nominal Strength of a designed structure is less than the effect
of factored loads acting on the structure
Rn n Qi
46
Comparison of ASD and LRFD
Design Approaches
ASD combines Dead and Live Loads and
treats them in the same way
In LRFD different load factors are assigned
to Dead Loads and Live Loads which is
appealing
Changes in load factors and resistance
factors are much easier to make in LRFD
compared to changing the allowable stress
in ASD
47
Comparison of ASD and LRFD
Design Approaches
LRFD is intrinsically appealing as it requires
better understanding of behavior of the
structure in its limit states
Design approach similar to LRFD is being
followed in Design of concrete structures in
form of Ultimate Strength Design -- why
not use similar approach design of steel
structures?
48
Comparison of ASD and LRFD
Design Approaches
ASD indirectly incorporates the Factors of
Safety by limiting the stress whereas
LRFD aims to specify Factors of Safety
directly by specifying Resistance Factors
and Load Factors
LRFD is more rational as different Factors
of Safety can be assigned to different
loadings such as Dead Loads, Live Loads,
Earthquake Loads and Impact Loads
49
Comparison of ASD and LRFD
Design Approaches
LRFD considers variability not only in
resistance but also in the effects of load
which provides measure of safety related
to probability of failure
It achieves fairly uniform levels of safety
for different limit states.
ASD still remains as a valid Design Method
50