All Calculations Hydraulics Design 06022018
All Calculations Hydraulics Design 06022018
NAME OF SCHEME
Town DISTRICT
Red cells for Input data
Increment per Incremental Percentage
POPULATION
DECADE YEAR Decade Increase Increment per
SOULS
"X" "Y" Decade
1961 33850
1971 40512 6662.00
1981 51953 11441.00 4779.00 19.681
1991 50770 -1183.00 -10258.00 28.241
2001 53858 3088.00 1905.00 -2.277
Total 20008.00 -3574.00 45.645
Average 5002.00 -1191.33 15.215
1 Arithmetical Progression Method:
Pn = P + ni Where P=population=Nos of decad,i= Increment per Decade
year Population
2011 58860
2015 60861
2030 68364
2045 75867
2 Incremental Increase Method:
Pn= population + average increase per decade + average incremental i
* Pn= P1 + nX + (n*(n+1)*Y)/2 ( * As Per Mannual)
year Population n X Y Pop
2011 57669 1 5002.00 -1191.33 57669
2015 58431 1.4 5002.00 -1191.33 58859
2030 64147 2.9 5002.00 -1191.33 61627
2045 69863 4.4 5002.00 -1191.33 61714
3 Geometric Progression Method:
sr no year population increse over decad growth rate
1 1961 33850
2 1971 40512 6662 0.197
3 1981 51953 11441 0.28
4 1991 50770 -1183 -0.02
5 2001 53858 3088 0.06
4 Graphical Method :
60000
f(x) = 32173.6328411499 exp( 0.115453131049186 x )
R² = 0.838308770532371
50000
40000
30000 Series1
Exponential (Series1)
20000
10000
0
1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2015 2030 2045
Sr.No Name of Method Anticipated Population Anticipated future population by various methods.
2011 2015 2030
1 Arithmetical progression Method 58860 60861 68364
2 Incremental Increase Method: 57669 58859 61627
3 Geometric Progression Method: 58903 61051 69826
4 Graphical
On Comparision Method
of above figures,(Expon) 64000
Adopt Geometric Progression Method considering the64500 74000 of Town
future development
as anticipated population and hence population considered after rounding the figures are as under.
Population
Sr.NO Name of Town 2011 2015 2030 2045
1 Siddhpur 64000 64500 74000 81000
Indstrial and
commercial
2 demand 10% 6400 6450 7400 8100
UFW 15%
includind Floting
3 population 9600 9675 11100 12150
Total 80000 80625 92500 101250
Data for Graph
1961 33850
1971 40512
1981 51953
1991 50770
2001 53858
2015
2030
2045
Series1
Exponential (Series1)
y various methods.
2045
75867
61714
79863
development of 81000
Town
re as under.
STATEMENT SHOWING THE DETAILS OF POPULATION FORECAST FOR TOWN
NAME OF SCHEME
Town DISTRICT
Red cells for Input data
Increment per Incremental Percentage
POPULATION
DECADE YEAR Decade Increase Increment per
SOULS
"X" "Y" Decade
1971 2900
1981 3784 884.00
1991 5067 1283.00 399.00 30.483
2001 7420 2353.00 1070.00 33.906
2011 10102 2682.00 329.00 46.438
Total 7202.00 1798.00 110.826
Average 1800.50 599.33 36.942
1 Arithmetical Progression Method:
12000
f(x) = 333.285714285714 x² − 195.714285714285 x + 2775.6
R² = 0.999151082668596
10000
8000
6000 Column L
Polynomial (Column L)
4000
2000
0
1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 2015 2030 2045
Sr.No Name of Method Anticipated Population Anticipated future population by various methods.
2011 2015 2030
1 Arithmetical progression Method 10102 10822 13523
2 Incremental Increase Method: 10102 10990 15174
3 Geometric Progression Method: 10102 11434 18193
4 Graphical Method (Expon) 10102 13500 17500
Average 10102 11686 16098
Data for Graph
1971 2900
1981 3784
1991 5067
2001 7420
2011 10102
2015
2030
2045
nL
mial (Column L)
2045
16224
20707
28947
22500
22095
Population forecasting for Various Districts as per TSC 120
Common Add 15 % Add 10 % Suggested
Dist. Multiplying Other for UFW Or Total Multiplying
Factor Demand NRW Factor
Porbandar 1.3 0.195 0.13 1.63 1.6
Select District ^
Enter Present Year 2018
H.G.L.
Delivery Head
Tot Head
G.L.
Suc Head
LSL
Energy line
H.G.L.
Head loss
Static Head
Effective Head
G.L.
6. Criteria for Design & Selection of Pipe materials (As per 70 & 80 - Technical Scrutiny Committee (TSC)
H.G.L.
y Committee (TSC)
Or
hf = [L*(Q/Cr)^1.81]/994.62*D^4.81
3. Darcy_Weisbach Formula
Hf = f(L/D)x(v^2/2g)
4. Reynolds number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gravity Main
Dia in mm
Material
From To
Up to 315 UPVC
Up to 315 HDPE/DI
(Spesific Terrain like Rocky & Saline etc)
Above 315 to 450 HDPE/DI
(Spesific Terrain like Rocky & Saline etc)
Hf m/km
DEMAND DEMAND DIA. COM. MAT. INN. DIA HGL GL EFF.H
H. W. LOSS HEAD NESS Q/A
Point. DIA OF REMARKS
C OF
PIPE
m.l.d. PIPE
m.l.d. mm mm mm m m m m m m/s
P.F. 1.500 97.00 101.00
1 0 97.00 97.00 0.00 4.00 1
1740 3.110 4.665 318.88 450.00 DI 445.00 130 0.30 0.52 2.50 0.35 ###
2 1740 96.48 66.05 30.43 34.95 2
1680 3.110 4.665 318.88 450.00 DI 445.00 130 0.30 0.51 2.50 0.35 ###
3 3420 95.97 73.99 21.98 27.01 3
4794 3.010 4.515 314.94 400.00 DI 395.00 130 0.51 2.43 2.50 0.43 ###
4 8214 93.54 84.40 9.14 16.60 4
Page 28 of 77
HYDRALIC DESIGN OF ZONE-II FOR PORBANDAR GROUP BASED ON NARMADA MAHI PIPE LINE
DISTANCE
Hf m/km
DEMAND DEMAND DIA. COM. MAT. INN. HGL GL EFF.H
TOTAL AT
POINT
MAX ON LOSS HEAD NESS Q/A
LPCD
H. W.
SECTION
DIA
BRANCH
Point. SECTION DIA OF
C OF
PIPE
m.l.d. PIPE
m.l.d. mm mm mm m m m m m m/s
P.F. 1.500 64.07 67.07
Advana h/w 0 0 97991 64.07 34.07 30.00 33.00
1500 97991 70 6.859 10.289 430.69 450.00 DI-9 450.00 130 1.23 1.85 0.00 0.75
Sanakhla Dhar B/F 1500 0 31206 97991 62.22 31.70 30.52 35.37
8315 66785 70 4.675 7.012 372.30 400.00 DI-9 400.00 130 1.08 8.95 0.00 0.65
A' Rama Zone-I b/f 9815 0 34163 66785 53.27 14.50 38.77 52.57
100 32622 70 2.284 3.425 283.56 300.00 DI-9 300.00 130 1.16 0.12 0.00 0.56
Majiwana B/F 9915 0 2190 32622 53.16 14.60 38.56 52.47
6060 30432 70 2.130 3.195 276.17 300.00 DI-9 300.00 130 1.02 6.17 0.00 0.52
Khambhodar B/F 15975 0 3231 30432 46.98 14.90 32.09 52.18
240 27201 70 1.904 2.856 257.29 280.00 hdpe 252.90 140 1.66 0.40 13.55 0.66
Natvarnagar B/F 16215 0 947 27201 46.58 14.18 32.40 52.89
1860 26254 70 1.838 2.757 253.85 280.00 hdpe 252.90 140 1.55 2.89 13.55 0.64
Bagvadar B/F 18075 0 5443 26254 43.70 14.56 29.14 52.51
2490 20811 70 1.457 2.185 232.40 280.00 hdpe 252.90 140 1.01 2.51 13.55 0.50
Bharvada B/F 20565 0 3192 20811 41.18 15.37 25.81 51.70
3630 17619 70 1.233 1.850 218.15 250.00 hdpe 225.80 140 1.29 4.68 12.10 0.53
Simani B/F 24195 0 1076 17619 36.51 11.21 25.30 55.86
3000 16543 70 1.158 1.737 212.99 250.00 hdpe 225.80 140 1.15 3.44 12.10 0.50
Kuchhadi B/F 27195 0 10190 16543 33.07 18.74 14.33 48.33
1890 6353 70 0.445 0.667 148.05 160.00 hdpe 144.40 140 1.72 3.25 7.80 0.47
Degam 29085 0 6353 6353 29.82 20.70 9.12 46.37
Page 29 of 77
AVE. MAX. REQ'D AVAILA-
DETAILS OF POPULATION SERVED EFF.
DAILY DAILY INNER BLE
CHAINAGE
TOTAL STATIC THICK V=
DISTANCE
Hf m/km
DEMAND DEMAND DIA. COM. MAT. INN. HGL GL EFF.H
TOTAL AT
POINT
MAX ON LOSS HEAD NESS Q/A
LPCD
H. W.
SECTION
DIA
BRANCH
Point. SECTION DIA OF
C OF
PIPE
m.l.d. PIPE
m.l.d. mm mm mm m m m m m m/s
Natvarnagar B/F 0 947 46.58 14.18 32.40 52.89
2181 947 70 0.066 0.099 71.83 90.00 hdpe 81.10 140 0.84 1.83 4.45 0.22
Natvar cistern 2181 947 947 44.75 16.49 28.26 50.58
Page 30 of 77
BANDAR GROUP BASED ON NARMADA MAHI PIPE LINE
Darcy --->
REMARKS
Advana h/w
Majiwana B/F
Khambhodar B/F
Natvarnagar B/F
Bagvadar B/F
Bharvada B/F
Simani B/F
Kuchhadi B/F
Degam
Majiwana B/F
Majiwana cistern
Khambhodar B/F
Khabhodar cistern
Page 31 of 77
REMARKS
Natvarnagar B/F
Natvar cistern
Bagvadar B/F
vachhoda
beran cistern
Bharvada B/F
Bharvada cistern
Simani B/F
simani cistern
Kuchhadi B/F
Rinavada cistern
Shrinagar B/F
Rinavada cistern
Kuchhadi ESR
Page 32 of 77
Flow Calculation as per Hazen-Williams Formula (Assumming Hf/1000 Mt.
Given Data Assumed Given Calculated Dat
Point Chainage Distance Inn. Dia 'C' Value Head Total Head H.G.L G.L. Eff. Head
loss/Km loss
120 0.0083333
mming Hf/1000 Mt.)
Calculated Data
Velocity Quantam
m/sec in MLD
Hazen-Williams
V = 4.567 x 10^-3 x C xD^0.63 x S^0.54
0.4878199 1.3241101
0.4069566 0.6213485
0.4242354 0.28788
0.0333333
Flow Calculation as per Modified Mannings Formula (Assumming Hf/1000 M
Given Data Assumed Given Calculated Dat
Point Chainage Distance Inn. Dia 'C' Value Head Total Head H.G.L G.L. Eff. Head
loss/Km loss
0.7917378 0.53726184
DI /CI = 0.011
Plastic = 0.011
Steel = 0.011
DESIGN FOR ECONOMIC SIZE OF PUMPING MAIN
Solution
1st 15 year 2nd15 years
1) Discharge at installation MLD 61.94 99.92 Mld
2) Discharge at the end of 15 years 99.92 125.51 Mld
3) Average discharge (MLD) 80.93 112.715 Mld
4) Hours of pumping for discharge at the end of 15 years 22 22 hrs
5) Average hours for pumping for average discharge 17.82 19.76 Mld
Discharge in pumping hours 109.00 136.92 Mld
6) KW required 16.49 H1 20.72 H2
7) Annual cost of electrical energy 32542.88 KW1 36080.65 KW2
= 536687.953 H1 747422.41467 H2
Table1 showing velocity and loss of head for diff pipe size
Sr no Pipe size in Frictional head loss per Velocity in m/sec 1st stage flow 2nd stage flow
mm 1000 meter
1st stage 2nd stage 1st stage flow 2nd stage Frictional loss Other lossses Total losses Frictional Other lossses Total losses
flow
109.00 flow
136.92 flow (in mt.) H1 including
10% 9.4 loss (in mt.) H1 including
10% 9.4
static head static head
MLD MLD (in mt.) of friction loss (in mt.) (in mt.) of friction loss (in mt.)
1 799 5.96 9.08 2.52 3.16 137.72 13.77 160.89 210.08 21.01 240.49
2 898 3.37 5.14 1.99 2.50 77.97 7.80 95.17 118.94 11.89 140.23
3 998 2.01 3.07 1.61 2.02 46.53 4.65 60.59 70.98 7.10 87.48
4 1049 1.58 2.41 1.46 1.83 36.51 3.65 49.56 55.69 5.57 70.66
5 1199 0.82 1.26 1.12 1.40 19.08 1.91 30.38 29.10 2.91 41.41
6 1397 0.39 0.60 0.82 1.03 9.06 0.91 19.37 13.82 1.38 24.60
D:Manoj\739903084.xlsx
TABLE 2 SHOWING KILOWATTS REQUIRED AND COST OF PUMP SETS FOR DIFFERENT PIPE
SIZES
Sr no Pipe size in 1st stage flow 2nd stage flow
mm H1 total Kw required Cost of Pump H2 total Kw required Cost of Pump
head loss (in with stand by ( Rs. In head loss with stand by ( Rs.
m) thousand) (in m) In thousand)
TABLE 3 SHOWING COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF OVER ALL COST STRUCTURE OF PUMPING MAIN FOR DIFF. PIPE SIZES
Sr no Pipe size in Total head in (m) Cost of Cost of Annual cost of Energy Total Cost of Annual cost of Energy Initial capital Grand total of
mm Pipeline of Pump energy charges capitalized Pump energy charges investment for capitalized
length mts. charges capitalized cost charges capitalized pumpset & cost for years
1st stage 2nd stage 23127 annual electrical 30
1 799 161 240 224540 106137 86350 588118 918795 149454 179746 1224226 charges
250966 1169761
2 898 95 140 275489 62779 51076 347872 686140 87147 104811 713854 146340 832480
3 998 61 87 329606 39967 32516 221462 591035 54364 65383 445315 91290 682324
4 1049 50 71 345911 32692 26597 181149 559751 43910 52810 359682 73735 633486
5 1199 30 41 438742 20043 16307 111065 569850 25734 30950 210796 43213 613063
6 1397 19 25 613189 12776 10395 70799 696764 15291 18390 125252 25677 722441
Table 3 shows that the most economical size of Main is 1199 mm costing Capitalised Rs. 613063186.8
But velocity for 2nd stage of this 1.40 grater than 1.2 Hence provide mm Dia
1.5E+6
Total Cost
1169761
1.0E+6
832480 722441
682324 633486 613063
500.0E+3
0.0E+0
799 898 998 1049 1199 1397
Pipe Dia in mm
D:Manoj\739903084.xlsx
GUJARAT WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD
Name of Project :-
STATEMENT No.
:- 17.00 Lit/sec
17 Capable of discharging ====>
:- 61.2 M^3/hr
P. H. S. SUB DIVISION
Orifice Cal
http://www.tasonline.co.za/toolbox/pipe/velorif.htm
Page 41
http://www.tasonline.co.za/toolbox/pipe/velorif.htm
Orifice LIQUID
Page 43
DESIGN OF ORIFICE
Name of Industry:
Consideration: -
Head available at tapping is Avg. H. considered.
as per actual
V= 20.59 M/sec
ù A= Q 0.023148
V 20.59
A= 0.001124 M2
A = Л/4 x d2
d2 = Ax4
= 0.00112 x 4
3.14
= 0.00143
ù d= 0.00143
d= 0.0378 M
Dharoi Intake Gola WTP 48185 72.29 20 86.748 800 130 4.27
Dharoi Intake Gola WTP 48185 72.29 20 86.748 900 130 2.40
Dharoi Intake Gola WTP 48185 72.29 20 86.748 1000 130 1.44
Static Head 109 Mtr
Head losses Total Head Velocity
For Total
length
145.28 254.28 1.66
81.86 190.86 1.31
49.00 158.00 1.06
Dia in mm Area in P in Length Rise in Mt. Fall in Mt. Coff.fric Velo. Qty. LPM
Sq.Mt kg/cm^2
90 0.0063585 1.5 200 0 0 0.015 2.9713633 1133.6048
x 10^-4 Kg/m.s.
Considering following Values
Rate of W.S. 70 LPCD
No. of Persons per House 5 Persons
Velocity 0.5 m/sec
Daily Req. Supply Hours 6 Hours
Nos. of incl. peak Qty in Area in
House factor M^3/Sec mm^2 Inner Dia in mm
1 1400 1.62037E-05 32.4074074 6.42520984389604
2 2800 3.24074E-05 64.8148148 9.0866189023309
3 4200 4.86111E-05 97.2222222 11.1287898989196
4 5600 6.48148E-05 129.62963 12.8504196877921
5 7000 8.10185E-05 162.037037 14.3672059806524
6 8400 9.72222E-05 194.444444 15.7384856078529
7 9800 0.00011343 226.851852 16.9995073683531
8 11200 0.00012963 259.259259 18.1732378046618
9 12600 0.00014583 291.666667 19.2756295316881
255 357000 0.00413194 8263.88889 102.602373228962
Hamx=> aVo/g => Where a=1425/(1+Kd/Emt)^1/2 Where a = Velocity of pressurewave travel in m/sec.
a = 1425/(1+kd/Emt)^1/2 k = Bulk Modules of water=2.07 x 10^8 Kg/m^2
a = 610.31263 610 m/s d = Dia im Meter
a = 2197.1255 2197 Kmph Em= Modulus of elesticity of pipe material in Kg/m^2
t = wall thickness of pipe in Mtr.
1425 = Velocity of sound in Water in m/sec
Hamx=> aVo/g => K=> 207000000
Hamx=> 30.591473 Mtr.
Material Em (Kg/m^2)
A.C 3E+09
C.I. 7.5E+09
Concrete 280000000
D.I. 1.7E+10
P.C. 3.5E+09
Polythene-Hard 90000000
Polythene-Soft 12000000
PVC 300000000
R.C.C. 3.1E+09
Steel 2.1E+10
Wrought Iron 1.8E+10
Input Data:-
Total Head on Pipeline. => 174 Mtr.
Daimeter of Pipeline . => 1318 mm
Thichness of Pipe. => 9 mm
To find a thickness of M.S. Pipe
1 Considerat 1 Fe 410 is adopted.
2 Corrossion factor considered
3 Pipe to be used in Rising Main
4 Minimum yield stress=235 Mpa=2396.33 Kg/cm2
5 Outer diameter inmm.
2 Equation 2*S*T
P=
D
Where
P .= Hydraulic Test Pressure mpa OR Twise of Working Pressure in Kg/cm2
D .= Specified outside pipe dia in mm.
T .= Specific thickness of the tube in mm.
S .= Stress 60 % of the specified minimum yield stress in Mpa. The maximum tes
pressure to be limlted to 5 Mpa where ever applicable.(IS-3589 Pg.No. 4)
S .= 1437.6
P .= 17.40
D .= 1318
T .= Specific thickness of the tube in mm.
2*S .= 2875.20
P*D
Now T .=
2*S
22933.2
Now T .=
2875.20
T .= 7.98
(i) However as per IS 3589 minimum preferable thickness is 4 mm without corrossion effect . After
corrossion thickness
.= of 1.5 mm. total +
7.976 comes to
.= 9.476
(ii) This pipe is laid on outfield where electric welding is only to be restored.For electric welding minimum
sheet is 5 mm. Hence adopted mext commercially available thickness
.= 10.000 mm.
Now Chec D/T=<150
1318
.=
10
.= 131.80 Hence O.K.
Optional
To find a thickness of M.S. Pipe
opted.
factor considered
sed in Rising Main
ield stress=235 Mpa=2396.33 Kg/cm2
eter inmm.
2*S*T
D
Out Flow 1 Hours => 16 Out Flow 1 (Supply to) => H/w 1 21.345 M.L.D Peak Factor => 1.5
Out Flow 2 Hours => 16 Out Flow 2 (Supply to ) => H/w 2 21.345 M.L.D Peak Factor => 1.5
Time In Flow 1 In Flow 2 Cummulat Out Flow 1 Out Flow 2 Cummulative Cummulative
Inflow Out Flow Surplus or
From To Yes =1 Hourly Yes =1 Hourly Yes =1 Hourly Yes = 1 Hourly (Suuply) Deficit
e = K (0.5 + 0.001 Dn) Suppose for DI K-9 and 800 mm Dia D I Pipe
where wall thickness = 9*(.5+.8)
e = wall thickness in mm, 11.7 mm
DN = the nominal diameter in mm, and
K = the whole number coefficient.
e nominal diameter by the following
5
5
Bharuch
6
Bhavnagar
7
Botad
8
Chhota Udaipur
9
Dahod
10
Dang
11
Devbhoomi Dwarka
12
Gandhinagar
13
13
Gir Somnath
14
Jamnagar
15
Junagadh
16
Kutch
17
Kheda
18
Mahisagar
19
19
Mehsana
20
Morbi
21
Narmada
22
Navsari
23
Panchmahal
24
Patan
25
Porbandar
26
Rajkot
27
Sabarkantha
28
Surat
29
Surendranagar
30
Tapi
31
Vadodara
32
32
Valsad
33