Week 7
Week 7
processing
RAW DATA
OUTLINE
DESCRIBING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA
Qualitative
data
Tabulating Graphing
Data Data
Frequency Relative
Bar Chart Pie Chart
Distribution Table Frequency Table
Colour
Colour Colour
Frequency Number
Frequency ofRelativePercentage
Relative
(Number
(Number
of Flowers) Flowers
of Flowers)
Frequency
FrequencyFrequency
Yellow 5
Yellow
Yellow 5 5 0.4170.416 41.7
Red 4
Red
Red 4 4 0.3330.333 33.3
Purple 3
Purple
Purple 3 3 0.2500.250 25.0
Total
Total 12 12 1.0001.000 100.0
EXERCISE 1
A total of 1,000 residents in Minnesota were asked which season they preferred.
The results were 100 liked winter best, 300 liked spring, 400 liked summer, and 200
liked fall.
If the data were summarized in a frequency table, how many classes would be used?
What would be the relative frequencies for each class?
CROSSTABULATION
Evaluation
Good Fair Bad Total
Gender
Male 13 4 3 20
Female 15 9 6 30
Total 28 13 9 50
CROSSTABULATION
Percentage of students divided by gender
Evaluation
Number of students Good Fair Bad Total
Gender
divided by gender and Male 65.00 20.00 15.00 100.0
evaluation Female 50.00 30.00 20.00 100.0
Evaluation
Good Fair Bad Total
Gender
Male 13 4 3 20
Female 15 9 6 30
Percentage of students divided by evaluation
Total 28 13 9 50
Evaluation
Good Fair Bad
Gender
Male 46.43 30.77 33.33
Female 53.57 69.23 66.67
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00
CROSSTABULATION
Number of students divided by gender and evaluation
Evaluation
Good Fair Bad Total
Gender
Male 13 4 3 20
Female 15 9 6 30
Total 28 13 9 50
Qualitative data
Graphing
Tabulating Data
Data
Frequency
Relative
Distribution Bar Chart Pie Chart
Frequency Table
Table
Shows the proportion or percent that each class represents of the total
number of frequencies
Total 12 100.00%
Yellow Red Purple
SIDE-BY-SIDE CHART
Evaluation
Good Fair Bad Total
Gender
Male 13 4 3 20
Female 15 9 6 30
Total 28 13 9 50
STACKED CHART
Evaluation
Good Fair Bad Total
Gender
Male 13 4 3 20
Female 15 9 6 30
Total 28 13 9 50
DESCRIBING FOR QUANTITATIVE DATA
Quantitative
data
Tabulating Graphing
Data Data
Frequency
Relative Frequency Common Stem-and-
Distribution
Table Charts Leaf Display
Table
Scatter
Crosstabulation Polygon
Diagram
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION TABLE
Ungrouped Data
Age 23 26 28 32 35 36 38 40 43 47 50 54 58 63 Sum
Freq. 1 2 2 2 4 3 5 8 7 4 5 4 2 1 50
Grouped Data
Age 20 – 24 25 – 29 30 – 34 35 – 39 40 – 44 45 – 49 50 – 54 55 – 59 60 – 64 Sum
Freq. 1 4 2 12 15 4 9 2 1 50
Age 20 – 29 30 – 39 40 – 49 50 – 59 60 – 69 Sum
Freq. 5 14 19 11 1 50
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION TABLE
Age 20 – 29 30 – 39 40 – 49 50 – 59 60 – 69 Sum
Freq. 5 14 19 11 1 50
width
Frequency
2
1.5
1
0.5
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
More
Temperature
10
Frequency
8
2
0
0 30 60 More
24, 35, 17, 21, 24, 37, 26, 46, 58, 30,
32, 13, 12, 38, 41, 43, 44, 27, 53, 27
24, 35, 17, 21, 24, 37, 26, 46, 58, 30, 32, 13, 12, 38, 41, 43, 44, 27, 53, 27
◼ Choose the smallest value - nice round boundaries and try to avoid
empty classes → Smallest value is 10
24, 35, 17, 21, 24, 37, 26, 46, 58, 30, 32, 13, 12, 38, 41, 43, 44, 27, 53, 27
Temperature Frequency
Frequency Temperature Frequency
12 –– 22
12 22 44 10 – 20 3
22 – 32 7 20 – 30 6
32 – 42 4 30 – 40 5
42 – 52 3 40 – 50 4
52 – 62 2 50 – 60 2
Total
Total 2020 Total 20
RELATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
Quantitative
data
Tabulating Graphing
Data Data
Frequency
Relative Frequency Common Stem-and-
Distribution
Table Charts Leaf Display
Table
Scatter
Crosstabulation Polygon
Diagram
STEM-AND-LEAF DISPLAYS
5 15 25 36 45 55 More
OGIVE
The London School of Economics and the Harvard Business School conducted a
study of how chief executive officers (CEOs) spend their day. The study found that
CEOs spend average about 18 hours per week in meetings, not including conference
calls, business meals, and public events (The Wall Street Journal, February 14,
2012). Shown below is the time spent per week in meetings (hours) for a sample of
25 CEOs.
EXERCISE 3
Used for
paired observations
taken from
two numerical variables
Radar (Spider Web) Chart