Are you struggling with the daunting task of writing a literature review for your research project or

academic paper? You're not alone. Crafting a comprehensive and well-structured literature review
can be incredibly challenging, requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and synthesis of existing
literature on your chosen topic. It's a time-consuming process that demands precision and attention to
detail.

A literature review is not just a summary of existing studies; it's a critical evaluation of scholarly
works relevant to your research question or thesis. It involves identifying gaps in the existing
literature, evaluating the quality and credibility of sources, and synthesizing information to provide a
coherent narrative that supports your research objectives.

Navigating through numerous academic databases, sorting through countless articles, and
synthesizing information from diverse sources can be overwhelming. Moreover, ensuring that your
literature review adheres to academic standards and conventions adds another layer of complexity.

That's where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes in. We understand the challenges students and researchers
face when writing literature reviews, and we're here to help. Our team of experienced writers
specializes in crafting high-quality literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements.

By outsourcing your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can:

1. Save Time: Let our experts handle the time-consuming task of researching and synthesizing
relevant literature while you focus on other aspects of your project.
2. Ensure Quality: Our writers are skilled at critically analyzing scholarly sources and
synthesizing information to produce literature reviews of the highest quality.
3. Meet Deadlines: We understand the importance of deadlines, and we strive to deliver your
literature review on time, allowing you to meet your project deadlines without compromising
quality.
4. Gain Insights: Our writers bring a fresh perspective to your research topic, helping you gain
new insights and perspectives that can enhance the overall quality of your work.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hold you back. Order your literature review
from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and take the first step towards academic success.
It provides a vast knowledge on the subject to the researcher. Are there factors about them (e.g. age,
race) that could be relevant to the question you’re trying to answer. Unleashing the Power of AI
Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. More speci?cally, we investigate the following
research question. Also look for publication patterns by investigating if certain approaches to the
topic were common during a specific time. Armed with a BA degree in English and a knack for
digital marketing, she explores her passions for literature, history, culture, and food through her
engaging and informative writing. It also ensures neither the research analysis was done before nor it
is a replication study. In simple terms, a literature is a review of the literature in the related subject
area. To achieve this objective, it is essential that the researcher conducting the systematic review
should include and presents all the informative evidence that meets the eligibility criteria for this
scientific research. They are often collaborative and tag, for instance, inclusion- and exclusion
criteria. Title: The title should accurately reflect the topic under review. A systematic review, on the
other hand, is more than just a summary. This guide focuses on systematic reviews in a Health
Sciences setting. How to write a systematic literature review Writing a systematic literature review
can feel like an overwhelming undertaking. Systematic Reviews: the process, quantitative,
qualitative and mixed methods. Systematic reviews are absolutely crucial in the field of evidence-
based medicine, but are also highly valued in other fields. To find government reports or similar texts,
you may even have to go to the organization’s website and search directly among their publication
lists. From here, identify the purpose or thesis for your topic. Given below are the main stages of a
systematic review. To do this, you can either use meta-analysis or narrative synthesis. These can
include heterogeneity, which is when studies’ lines within the forest plot don’t overlap with any
other studies. Start by focusing on the red box and examine the comparative risk column that shows
the assumed risk among the control group. The protocol can be registered, in PROSPERO for
example, or in another open repository, such as Open Science Framework or Figshare. The process of
performing a systematic literature review must be transparent and. What is the best approach to
conducting a systematic review. They include: non-peer-reviewed journals pharmaceutical industry
files conference proceedings pharmaceutical company websites internal reports Gray literature
sources are more likely to contain negative conclusions, so you’ll improve the reliability of your
findings by including it. The review distinguishes between types of data that have been studied,
evaluated, and detailed over a known period. This will give you more control over the search and
will also make your search strategy more transparent. However, they do support requests for timely
evidence synthesis, including urgent, emergent, and high priority health issues. Your systematic
literature review doesn’t have to contain a comparison, but you’ll want to stipulate at this stage,
either way.
A logging system is needed to make sure all relevant studies. Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana is a
scheme launched in India. Unfortunately, it is not possible to easily retrieve a list containing all the
references from several different publications. Besides that, the systematic review tool can be of use.
A young researcher's guide to a systematic review 6 min read. The review protocol was developed in
cooperation with the ?rst. When you’ve answered the main questions and achieved the set goals,
sharing your thoughts is a wise solution, especially if you disagree with something and need to
support any points of view. Most systematic reviews preregister the research plan, meaning that the
authors submit their planned methods to a registry like PROSPERO prior to conducting the study.
This article is part of a Series Series Types of articles: A guide for young researchers Today, young
researchers wish to start publishing articles early on in their career. Related Posts: The Differences
Between Pottery and Ceramics What Are The Differences Between Dumplings and Wontons. A
safer way is to delimit your search to the dates when articles were last added to the database, or use
EndNote to deduplicate your new references. To reduce risk for bias, it is also recommended that at
least two people, independent of one another, review all found articles and choose which studies to
include in the review. Draw this out into a forest plot, which provides a simple visual representation
of variation between the studies. In 2013, she received TQM from American university, BCPS,
CPHQ, and M.Sc. of Clinical Pharmacy. This is because grey literature is often more current than
published literature and is likely to have less publication bias. Systematic reviews are especially
important in evidence-based medicine. One way is to search directly in a given database’s thesaurus.
A systematic literature review aims to classify, critically appraise, and summarise the current
evidence concerning an identified issue, similar to conventional literature reviews. In most cases, it
will help you identify patterns and gain a better understanding of the current state of an area and the
main underlying issues. The purpose is to provide banking services to all households. Meta-analyses
also facilitate investigations of the consistency of evidence across studies, and the exploration of
differences across studies. Recently uploaded skeletal system details with joints and its types skeletal
system details with joints and its types Minaxi patil. The unfiltered search results should be saved
and retained for possible reanalysis. Stand-alone literature reviews are the most common type of
literature review and are frequently assigned by professors. By following a systematic approach,
researchers can minimize bias and ensure that their review is transparent, reproducible, and reliable.
Search strategy on basis of finding the words or the set of words must be followed. Average score
wasn’t working for me but with experts help from DWH. To write a strong stand-alone literature
review, you should approach the research using a step-by-step process. The search should have high
sensitivity, that is, it should be created in such a way that the search will retrieve all relevant articles
within a research area, or at least discover as many as possible. Use specific authors or sources as
examples, and be sure to explain any similarities or departures in approach, methodology, findings, or
argument.
This is where the researcher shows his knowledge on the subject area he or she is researching on.
Look for patterns in authors’ approaches or in their methodological handling of the topic. Then,
explain where your work fits within this discussion and why. Select “ OR ” between each row and
add more rows if needed. What is the difference between a literature review and a systematic
review. Put the free text words within a parenthesis and write TI in front of the parenthesis. It
provides a vast knowledge on the subject to the researcher. Usually, there is information here that
your review could do without. This series provides detailed guidance to young researchers about
different article types that journals publish and the standard requirements, procedures, and approach
to each type. Heterogeneity means diversity (and is the opposite of homogeneity). There are many
different kinds of reviews, and the kind that will suit you best will depend on a variety of factors,
for instance, how much time you have, as well as what kind of research question you’re working
with. For example, “What has already been written on subject X?”, then narrowing down to the
research question. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements,
consider adding it to the working plan. Click on the number under the heading Citing Articles, you’ll
receive a list of these 73 publications. After that, there is an option to highlight the key points and
give recommendations for future studies or research. Systematic review article and Meta-analysis:
Main steps for Successful writin. When you include the subject heading in your search you will find
articles about a subject even if the authors of the article have chosen other, adjacent words to
describe the article themselves. Adding a number after adj will determine how many words you
want to “allow” between your two terms. There are several different frameworks available that might
be able to help you structure and delimit your research question. Silicon nitride is a highly versatile
material ideal for integrated photonics due to its wide bandgap, excellent mechanical properties, and
compatibility with the CMOS fabrication process. Furthermore, systematic reviews are of particular
importance in research areas where substantial work has been done and information has been
produced in the past. You can use their samples to improve your literature review or order a custom
one. The University of Plymouth Library has a good website where you can read more about the
most commonly used frameworks. These criteria should be based on your research question and the
specific objectives of your review. This will give you more control over the search and will also make
your search strategy more transparent. For each review family, it provides recommendations on
appropriate methods of information retrieval. This is something that needs to be paid careful attention
to. World-Wide Web OR project OR development) AND (method OR process OR. This is the
pooled, or “meta,” effect size from an included meta-analysis (we’ll come to meta-analysis shortly).
However, students could gain a reasonable idea from citations and journal rankings (albeit rough).
Systematic review article and Meta-analysis: Main steps for Successful writin. Explain why this has
been the case and how these approaches enhance or limit current understandings of the topic. Fig. 3
illustrates. This re?ects that, while the idea of integrating. They are usually one of the first steps in
research methodologies. The core methodology behind a living review can be that of a full SLR or a
rapid review. Sometimes individuals must meet them adequately, understand the difficulties and
determine their main priorities, deciding what to examine and how to start writing. There might have
been gaps in the existing knowledge or a disagreement in the literature that necessitated a review.
This involves organizing your findings, writing a clear and structured paper, and submitting it to a
relevant journal or conference for publication. You can also find out which search terms were used to
index your key articles. It’s best if this part is done by two independent people. Many of the reviews
in these databases can be accessed by searching within PubMed using the Clinical Queries feature.
But, the literature review does not just state what an article or book states; the review assesses and
evaluates it. Google does not filter the evidence in this manner. After reviewing the full-text articles
of the remaining 800 studies, 50 studies were excluded based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The structure will help you to clearly express your ideas and demonstrate how your sources are
connected. It explains the function of a literature review and provides guidance on how to write one.
In clinical research, it is common to use the PICO-structure: P opulation, I ntervention, C ontrol and
O utcome. In this example, 141 were people assigned to the intervention group in Study A.
Outcome: What is your expected outcome or outcome you are interested in. The rapid review
method has been widely used during the COVID crisis to help ensure treatments reach patients in a
timely manner. Authors from our team are degree holders and also have considerable writing
experience. It’s basically a hint for the following researchers. Should previous systematic reviews and
meta-analyses be included in a systematic review. Cornell University Library has created a decision
tree that can help you determine what kind of review might best suit your goals and constraints.
Where will your education and career journey take you? When this interval crosses the line of no
effect, the effect could be null or could even run in the opposite direction. Here we’ll review how
you can do so in Web of Science and in SpiderCite, which builds on data from Lens.org. They’ll be
glad to develop new custom literature review examples for your personally. If this is not going
beyond the requirements of writing a sample of literature review, why not. Extract the data Every
step of the data extraction must be documented for transparency and replicability.
You will use these to create search blocks that will then form the basis for the search strings used in
the different databases. The process of performing a systematic literature review must be
transparent and. Systematic reviews are used mainly because the review of existing studies is often
more convenient than conducting a new study. Sometimes grey literature, such as dissertations or
clinical trials, is included in the search as well. Embedded literature reviews are usually placed near
the beginning of your essay in order to provide your reader with important context as well as to
situate your work within the wider body of research on your topic. Although they are quite similar
patterns, they are used to review or summarize information with different kinds of perspectives. Of
these 141 people, 1 person experienced the adverse outcome that the forest plot summarizes. Confirm
that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Check the
basic literature review format and elements used in the example. Like other literature reviews,
historiographies can be embedded or stand-alone. When used properly, they can add a lot of value to
your research. My 4-year academic journey has been made flawless. Unlike a systematic review, the
literature review does not use any pre-specified protocol or plan. Take a look at these guidelines for
interpreting results from the Cochrane Institute. Values greater than 75% may indicate that a change
in the meta-analysis method (random vs fixed effects) is needed. The authors found that there were
two sets of expertise required: that of gathering the information to ensure completeness, and creating
a literature review that could be repeated by a different person later to yield largely the same
information. Discussion: The Discussion should summarize the main findings from the review and
then move on to discuss the limitations of the study and the reliability of the results. In this example,
141 were people assigned to the intervention group in Study A. Furthermore, critical review applies
to research areas where point-by-point arguments on a particular research topic are needed to be
identified to reach an accurate and precise conclusion on the research question. Share in strategic
planning; hospital accreditation; and stewardship education. Codes related to the iterative and
incremental design and development principle. You can then export the references from the list to
EndNote or another reference management program. Which principles constitute a user-centered
agile software development approach? It becomes quite difficult to get your message through
without the help of the right review format. Diagnostic test accuracy reviews produce a summary of
diagnostic test performance so that their accuracy can be determined before use by healthcare
professionals. For example, Radeva-Petrova et al. ( 2014 ) include the following passage in their
plain language summary. You should employ multiple reviewers in order to minimize bias and
strengthen analysis. If you have less time than that available, you may want to conduct a rapid
review instead. Meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarise the results of
independent studies. She obtained the add qualification from American board in infectious disease.