Sandler Training
Sandler Training
Full disclosure: I’m one of those weirdos who actually enjoys prospecting and loves talking about it
at length. That takes a lot of people by surprise. But it’s true.
When new clients approach us about the possibility of Sandler working with their sales teams,
one of the first things we notice is that, for most of those salespeople, prospecting is a major
headache. It’s this big, scary challenge. And you know what lies at the heart of that uneasiness with
prospecting? Fear. It’s the basic, human fear of rejection -- the fear that most of us have about
hearing people say no. We don’t have to take that personally, but we do. I’ve noticed something
else, though: it’s not just about the fear of being rejected. There’s also a fear of uncertainty, of not
being able to feel confident about what works and what doesn’t. That’s another big part of the fear
people have built up for themselves about prospecting. They want to know: What’s the right way
to do it?
Specifically, there are six modern prospecting mistakes that we help sales teams learn to replace
with newer, proven techniques that work a whole lot better. But before I can tell you about those
mistakes, I have to share one of our Sandler Rules with you. Our organization is famous for its selling
rules, and this one, in my experience, is an important one for anyone prospecting for new business
at this point in history. The rule sounds like this: If your competition is doing something, stop doing
it right away.
What’s fascinating is that David Sandler came up with this rule back in the 1960s … but it is
still completely relevant today. In fact, if anything, it’s more relevant today than it was back
then, because standing out from the competition really is a do-or-die proposition in our time.
Anybody who is in any sort of a leadership position knows what I’m talking about here: you get a
deluge of prospecting attempts in your inbox, in your voicemail, in your LinkedIn feed … every single
day. And how do you respond to them? You delete them or ignore them, the minute you figure out
that it’s a salesperson – or a bot. Sometimes, let’s face it, it’s hard to tell the difference!
So, our single biggest challenge as sales professionals is simply being seen. It’s standing out from
the crowd and getting the attention of our prospects. What follows is my take on the six most
common mistakes keeping us from doing that … followed by some strategies for replacing those
mistakes with tactics that we’ve found work a lot better in the modern marketplace.
The same goes for using the person’s first name “Emily, “Emily, I’ve been hearing buzz
I’ve been hearing buzz about your company,” or “Emily, about your company, would
I noticed your skills as a coach.” Or “Emily, it seems love to connect.”
like you’re doing some great work at Sandler “I noticed your skills as a coach
Performance Partners.” We don’t want to make the and decided to connect. Our
mistake of imagining that any of that is personalized, networks and skills could be
because today, it isn’t. Using the person’s name or mutually beneficial.”
the organization’s name isn’t personalizing anything.
Computers do that now, and they do it millions and “Seems likes you’re doing
millions of times a day. Buyers today see right through it. some great work at Sandler
We see right through it when we get messages like that. Performance Partners. How are
If it looks like a sales message and smells like a sales you handling this wild market?”
message, guess what? We delete it.
The simple answer is: We work really hard on the front end before we ever reach out to someone.
We create a hyper-personalized message.
That may not be what all of us are used to doing, but it’s what we need to do if we want to be
competitive. Before we ever reach out, we want to find some things that we can talk about that
will help us to make this case to each one of our prospects: Of all the people in the world, you are
the only person on the planet who could have received this particular message.
If we don’t make that case, then we don’t even make it onto the radar screen. I realize that’s a
paradigm shift. I realize it takes some effort on our side. But that’s the reality. And I promise you it
takes less time and effort than you may think.
Let me give you an example from real life. (And by the way, I have permission from my client to
share this.) Here’s Caitlyn’s initial message to Jerry, a decision maker who eventually ended up
working with her company:
“Hi, Jerry, thanks for connecting. The Mutant Sherlock Holmes activation at Comic Con was amazing.
I walked by as you were starting to let people through and wow, that was a big line.”
“Do you have your own team of brand ambassadors for those activations? Or do you use an agency?”
“Great outbound message. It definitely has been the most impressive I’ve seen in quite some time.
So hats off. LOL”
“As far as sourcing, I have a network of about 20 BAs for Los Angeles and my colleagues do the
same thing for their event areas.”
Now, let me share some of the responses I hear from sales professionals when I share this example.
“That wouldn’t work for us.” “That’s too cutesy.” “People in our industry wouldn’t respond to that kind
of message.”
Here’s what I say in response: What you say to make your case is up to you – but you still have
to make your case. If you don’t make it crystal clear that the prospect is the only person in the
universe who could possibly have received your message, and lead with that, you will be ignored.
That’s just the reality of the world we live in now.
Am I saying you have to go to a trade show and watch what’s happening at someone’s booth
before you reach out to them? Of course not. We can use ChatGPT and Google and LinkedIn, to
name only three of the amazing tools at our disposal, to come up with some relevant observation
about the person we’re targeting. You can say anything you want, if what you say proves beyond a
shadow of a doubt that you’ve done your homework and you’re a) not a bot and b) not spamming
people with the same message, with minor tweaks, repeatedly. We’ve got to find something that
shows them clearly and immediately that we’ve done our research, that we care, that we know
something they care about, and that we’re reaching out with the intention to help.
We’re all taught at some point that we need to ask for a Call to Action (CTA)– a request that the
person we’re talking to commit to do something. And usually, we do make that request. But the
landscape has changed. The calls to action that worked a decade ago with a brand-new contact
simply aren’t effective anymore. They don’t set us apart from the noise. In fact, they make us part of
that noise. I’m talking about calls to action like:
In the situations where we have no prior relationship with the person, these are CTAs that,
statistically speaking, are highly unlikely to result in any action other than the person ignoring
us and our message. Is it possible these might have worked years ago, before decision makers
were so heavily bombarded with messaging from unknown sellers that a whole industry based on
blocking those messages emerged, and a whole new field of software designed to evade those
blocks took off? Absolutely. Years ago, this kind of CTA made statistical sense. Today, they are
premature. Buyers simply tune them out.
Look once again at Caitlyn’s CTA. It’s so subtle, you might have missed it – but it’s in there. She asks
Jerry, do you have your own team of brand ambassadors for those activations? Or do you use an
agency? In other words, she asks him a question that is relevant, easy for him to answer, and a
deepening of the conversation between peers. Make no mistake – that’s a CTA. She knew what
hers was. Make sure you know what yours is, too!
Those old-fashioned CTAs are a bit like going to a party, walking up to someone you’ve never met
and asking them if they’ll commit to a long-term relationship with you. You need a bit of back and
forth first!
Notice, too, that when Caitlyn asks those questions in the way she asks them (with the subtext
“Is this even something that’s worth talking about – is there even a possible fit here?”) she’s
establishing equal business stature. That’s very important – just as important digitally as it is
face-to-face. She’s testing for fit, which is what professionals do. They don’t waste their time or
anyone else’s.
This one surprises a lot of people. You read right. I want you to call people. Here again, I get some
interesting responses from salespeople. They say things like, “Emily, every time I actually hear back
from a prospect, they always email me back – they never call me back. So doesn’t that mean
phone calls are a waste of time?” No – it doesn’t mean that. And yes – if you’re doing this right,
that’s exactly what happens. Now, if you’re having a hard time getting your head around that, let’s
talk for a moment about the whole purpose of making a phone call … because that purpose is not
the same today as it was just a few years ago.
For professional salespeople today, the purpose of the phone call is not to have a conversation with
someone in real time when they answer the phone; these days, that’s just not likely to happen. We
don’t imagine they’re going to answer the phone – sometimes they do, of course, which is great,
but it happens so rarely that we can’t count on that. And we don’t want to imagine they’re going to
call us back after we leave a strong, professional voicemail message. Neither of those outcomes
is the purpose of making that call. The purpose of us making the call is to show that we are using
everything within our power to get in touch with this individual. That’s a powerful signal, and we
need to send it – professionally and appropriately, of course.
This one overlaps with the first mistake – the lack of real personalization. The only difference is that
instead of personalizing what I type, I’m personalizing what I say. So, yes, I’m going to pick up the
phone, and dial the number, and I’m going to leave a voicemail that says:
“Hey, Jerry, it’s Emily from Sandler. Since I didn’t catch you, I’m going to send you an email, explain
why I’m reaching out. Talk to you soon. “
That’s it.
I’m not going to ask them to call me back, I’m not going to give them a sales pitch, I’m not even
going to leave my number. (Their phone system probably shows them that anyway.) All I’m doing
is connecting the dots. The unspoken message here is powerful: I am the same person who is
trying to reach you via email, who’s trying to reach you via LinkedIn, who’s trying to reach you by
means of whatever platform, and I’m using all the different tools at my disposal. I’m professional,
I’m polite, I’m persistent, and I’m investing time, energy and attention in this conversation I want to
have with you, which is important.
Here’s why this approach is non-negotiable, as I see it. I don’t necessarily know, when I’m talking
to a prospect or reaching out for them for the first time, what the best way to get in touch with
them is. Think about it. We all know people for whom email is practically useless if you’re trying to
get through to them. Unless it comes from within their organization, or from someone they know,
they consider every message to be junk. We also know people who never log into LinkedIn, or log
into it so rarely that it’s pointless to try to reach them on that platform. Are you with me so far? I
thought so. We also know people whose voicemailbox is always full – either they’re bad at deleting
messages or they never seem to listen to the messages in the first place.
Now, I realize that, for a lot of people, the first reaction to this kind of prospecting routine is going
to be to say, “That’s overkill. That sounds pushy.” You know what? It’s not. Listen to the technique.
We’ll assume I didn’t reach the person, since that’s by far the most likely outcome.
That’s it. If you do it authentically and with full confidence, as a peer, I promise it does not come off
as pushy at all. What’s next? I click through to LinkedIn, where I’m going to send them a connection
request. I may or may not put a little note in the request, but if I do, it’s not going to be a sales pitch.
It’s just going to point out that, as promised, I’m connecting a face with the name I left on their
voicemail, and briefly explaining that I’ll be sending them an email today as well. You’ve already
got an idea of the kind of email I’m going to send – I told you about it when we talked about the first
mistake, the lack of personalization.
As you can see, combos are really not overkill. The reason they’re not overkill is that I’m not giving
a sales pitch three times. I’m simply using every one of those channels as a way to clear away the
smoke. What I’m really doing is saying, “Of all the reach-outs you’re getting on a given day, there’s
this person named Emily from Sandler who is really trying to get in touch with you.” The combos
have a way of taking you closer to the place marketers call “top of mind awareness.” The whole
idea comes from the world of advertising. People have to hear your message multiple times in
order for you to even show up on their radar screen. That’s what this does.
So: what happens next? A couple of days later, I could move on to my second combo. It might look
like this:
And a couple of days after that, I might move on to the third combo:
You get the idea. The whole time, the only thing I’m doing is making what the marketing people call
“touches” that create and deepening the recognition that a) I exist and b) I’m trying to get in touch
with them.
It’s impossible to overemphasize just how counterproductive this very common mistake is. What we
see often is that salespeople will make some kind of outreach attempt – let’s say it’s an email – and
then wait way too long before the next outreach.
Then they wait one or two weeks after sending that email… and leave a voicemail.
Then wait another one or two weeks … and send another email.
The problem is, if I’m a decision maker receiving these messages at such a spread-out cadence,
I can’t even begin to piece together that you exist, much less that you’re trying to reach out to me.
You’re just not on my radar screen.
The visual below, an example put together by our friends at Vidyard, shows a much better way to
go. This is what a planned cadence looks like. Obviously, you don’t have to follow this plan verbatim,
but we do strongly suggest you set up a cadence that works for you, one that sets up a clear
sequence without long gaps in it.
— Personalized Vidyard
Email
— Call
Day #12 Day #17 Day #20 Day #24 Day #30
— Call
Reality check: there is such a thing as a buyer journey, in both business-to-business and business-
to-consumer sales. And guess what? These days, a predictable component of that journey is
people Googling you – as an individual. Are they going to look up your company? Maybe. But in
deciding whether and how they’re going to have a conversation with you, I can promise you that
every single buyer that you reach out to is going to give you a higher level of scrutiny than they give
your organization. Assuming you’ve done a great job at the hyper-personalization, they’re going
to be curious about you, and they’re probably going to do an online search about you before they
decide whether to answer you. That has to be our assumption. And if even if one good prospect
does and they don’t like what they see because of that search, that’s a problem.
I have permission to share with you a remark I heard during a conversation with a procurement
person at a large publicly traded company. That person said to me, “The first thing I do when
somebody reaches out to me is I look them up.” That’s a direct quote from someone in a position
of authority at a very large procurement department. What that quote says to me is that we all
need to expect an online search! And the marketplace is telling us the same thing. The trend I see
in the real world is more buyers, not fewer buyers, doing this kind of search to figure out who this
person is who’s trying to have a conversation. So: expect to be Googled. And accept that, usually,
what people are going to see when they Google you is your LinkedIn profile.
In Summary
Fixing all six of these common prospecting mistakes are priorities for salespeople and teams who
are serious about competing in a post-2020 environment.