The Challenge of Crafting a Literature Review

Writing a literature review can be an arduous task for many students and researchers alike. It involves
delving deep into existing scholarly works, analyzing various perspectives, and synthesizing the
findings into a cohesive narrative. The process demands meticulous attention to detail, critical
thinking, and extensive research skills.

One of the primary challenges of crafting a literature review is the sheer volume of information
available. Navigating through countless scholarly articles, books, and other sources can be
overwhelming. Moreover, identifying relevant literature and extracting key insights requires a
significant investment of time and effort.

Another hurdle is ensuring coherence and structure in the review. Integrating diverse sources while
maintaining a clear and logical flow of ideas can be daunting. Striking the right balance between
summarizing existing research and offering critical analysis is crucial but often tricky to achieve.

Furthermore, writing a literature review requires advanced writing skills. Effectively conveying
complex ideas and synthesizing information in a concise yet comprehensive manner demands
proficiency in academic writing conventions.

Given these challenges, many individuals seek assistance in crafting their literature reviews. ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a reliable solution for those in need of expert guidance. With a team of
experienced writers well-versed in academic research and writing, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides
tailored literature reviews that meet the highest standards of quality and academic rigor.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and alleviate the
stress associated with this demanding task. Whether you're a student working on a thesis or a
researcher preparing a manuscript, our professional writers will ensure that your literature review is
thorough, well-structured, and compelling.

Don't let the complexities of writing a literature review hinder your academic or research endeavors.
Order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and experience the difference our expertise can make in your
work.
It will take time to read, reread, annotate, and start to see connections beween sources. Expand View
on PubMed docum-enter.com Save to Library Save Create Alert Alert Cite Share 86 Citations Highly
Influential Citations 3 Background Citations 32 Methods Citations 15 View All 86 Citations Citation
Type Has PDF Author More Filters More Filters Filters Sort by Relevance Sort by Most Influenced
Papers Sort by Citation Count Sort by Recency Before You Search the Literature: How to Prepare
and Get the Most Out of Citation Databases J. As a result, it is possible and encouraged to publish
abbreviated versions of the review in other applicable scholarly journals; indeed, engaging in a review
update or joining a well-established review team may be a beneficial way to get involved in the
systematic review process. This conceptual contribution of the article should be mentioned in the
literature summary table. If chosen, the electronic document or paper-and-pencil extraction methods
should only be used for small reviews, as larger sets of articles may become unwieldy. An official
website of the United States government The.gov means it's official. PDF Five tips for developing
useful literature summary tables for writing Literature summary tables are not only meant to provide
an overview of basic information (authors, country, purpose and findings) about included articles, but
they should also provide detailed information about the theo-retical and conceptual frameworks and
the methods used in the included article. Expand PDF Save. 1 2 3 4 5. 27 References Citation Type
Has PDF Author More Filters More Filters Filters Sort by Relevance Sort by Most Influenced Papers
Sort by Citation Count Sort by Recency Systematic search offers a sound evidence base. Using a
template, you understand the upgrade will always have the formatting, design, and general
arrangement. There are circumstances under which a meta-analysis is not possible, however, and
other statistical synthesis methods might be considered, so as to make best use of the available data.
Chapter 9: Summarizing study characteristics and preparing for synthesis. It allows the combination
of findings from different studies, highlighting new findings relevant to practice or policy. Data
extraction by at least two reviewers is necessary to ensure inter-rater reliability and prevent data entry
errors. If nothing matches your document type, you can use the “Other” field. Test the data collection
table (optional).? Collect (extract) the data.? Review the data collected for any errors.? For accuracy,
two or more people should extract data from each study. A review of a clearly formulated question
that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant research,
and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review. Door verder gebruik
te maken van deze website ga je akkoord met het gebruik van deze cookies. Role of Regulatory
authorities in Quality education, practice, and rights of. Tone at the top: the effects of gender board
diversity on gender wage inequal. A meta-analysis aspect is often used in systematic reviews, which
entails using statistical techniques to synthesise data from several studies into a single quantitative
estimation or summary effect size. The data extraction form should be as long or as short as
necessary and can be coded for computer analysis if desired. Step 1: Complete Pre-Review Tasks
Step 2: Develop a Protocol Step 3: Conduct Literature Searches Step 4: Manage Citations Step 5:
Screen Citations Step 6: Assess Quality of Included Studies About Step 7: Extract Data from
Included Studies About data extraction, select a data extraction tool, what should i extract, helpful
tip- data extraction. It is also vital that methodological and conceptual limitations and strengths of
the articles included in the review are provided because not all review articles include empirical
research papers. The Dissertation Literature Review Example will give you a lot of new ideas for a
unique review. The examples described in this section illustrate approaches for making this process
more transparent. 9.3 Preliminary steps of a synthesis 9.3.1 summarize the characteristics of each
study (step 2.1). A starting point for synthesis is to summarize the PICO characteristics of each study
(i.e. the PICO of the included studies, see Chapter 3 ) and categorize these PICO elements in the
groups (or domains) pre-specified in the protocol (i.e. the PICO for each synthesis). Expand 592 PDF
Save A study of the utilization of research in practice and the influence of education. Why do the
evidence tables and scores focus on GRADE. Building a summary table and developing solid
synthesis skills is important for nurses, nurse practitioners, and allied health researchers. Publications
Account settings Browse Titles NCBI Bookshelf. The key here is to use the table to provide a simple
representation of what the research has found (or not found, as the case may be).
FAQs: Literature Review Template What format is the template (doc, pdf, ppt, etc.). The literature
review chapter template is provided as a Google Doc. Always cite your sources correctly and
paraphrase ideas in your own words while maintaining the original meaning. Expand 592 PDF Save
A study of the utilization of research in practice and the influence of education. Report this
Document Download now Save Save Literature Review Template For Later 0 ratings 0% found this
document useful (0 votes) 5K views 7 pages Literature Review Template Uploaded by AndreMostert
The writing of a literature review is one of those tasks that you don't know where to begin and what
to do. Search terms: “diabetes mellitus” AND aspirin AND “cardiovascular events”. The available
templates may be in the form of a table, chart or a structured framework that extracts some essential
information about every article. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. Out of these,
the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the
working of basic functionalities of the website. Is this template for an undergrad, Master or PhD-
level thesis. A literature review of your study helps in explaining your study efficiently. Systematic
review standards are elements that should be reported in any published systematic review. The effect
sizes are given, along with a 95 percent confidence interval (CI) range, and are presented in both
quantitative and graphical form (e.g., forest plots). Each trial is visually represented as a horizontal
diamond shape in forest plots. I am writing my first lit review within a proposal (rather last minute,
yikes) and this is so helpful to stay organized. Writers can easily summarize material but seem to
struggle to adequately synthesize knowledge about their topic and express that in their writing. The
review authors must include this information in their summary table. We also provide examples from
our published reviews to illustrate how useful literature summary tables can be developed and what
sort of information should be provided. How much of that is completely different from the job you
have done. Software to help you create coded data extraction forms from templates include:
Covidence, DistillerSR (needs subscription), EPPI Reviewer (subscription, free trial), or AHRQ's
SRDR tool (free) which is web-based and has a training environment, tutorials, and example
templates of systematic review data extraction forms. Figure 2 offers an example of a literature
summary table. 4. We have outlined five tips that could enhance the quality of the data extraction
and synthesis process by developing useful literature summaries. Equations Complex Numbers
Quadratic Expressions Inequalities Absolute Value E. A copy of this completed form will be
available via the intranet to help others carrying out reviews in the future and to avoid duplicating
work already undertaken in the Centre. Merely noting the quality score based on standardised critical
appraisal templates is not adequate because the readers should be able to identify the reasons for
assigning a weak or moderate rating. The sources include government simple reports, IT software
websites, scholarly articles, etc. Keep in mind that you will be able to search and filter this column at
a later stage, so use keywords that make sense. Selection of studies After retrieving and reviewing a
detailed list of abstracts, any studies that tend to satisfy inclusion requirements will be collected and
thoroughly reviewed. We usually recommend Mendeley, but any of the popular reference
management tools will do the trick. Handwritten extraction is less popular now due to widespread
electronic tools. If you are conducting an analytical review with a meta-analysis to compare data
outcomes from several clinical trials you may wish to computerize the data collection and analysis
processes. Mcsherry Medicine, Sociology Journal of advanced nursing 1997 TLDR The results
demonstrate (inferential statistics chi-square and correlation tests) that registered nurses and
midwives are largely in agreement with research based practices, although understanding about
research is minimal and dependent on grade, length qualified, shifts and numbers of hours worked.
They represent two different parts of the review process: assembling relevant information and
synthesizing it. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 9: CD011045. Something might
seem irrelevant at first read, but you’ll be surprised how the focus of your research can change over
time, leading you to inevitably ask the dreaded question, “where did I see that article again?”.
Planning for the synthesis should start at protocol-writing stage, and Chapter 2 and Chapter 3
describe the steps involved in planning the review questions and comparisons between intervention
groups. The tables included information about authors, country, purpose, study design, setting,
sample characteristics, sampling technique, method of. This categorization determined which studies
were eligible for each comparison (e.g. counselling versus usual care; single or multi-component
strategy). Keep in mind that the exact requirements for the literature review chapter will vary
between universities and degree programs. These are typically minor, but it’s always a good idea to
double-check your university’s requirements before you finalize your structure. The second tab
(labelled “Literature Summary”) will auto-populate with descriptive statistics of the input as you
enter data. Additionally, a review here may reveal that your literature is aged, or that you need to
improve your balance of academic and practitioner literature. But some studies may have multiple, if
the review addresses more than one comparison, or deals with substantially different populations that
require separate tables. The template follows the standard format for academic literature reviews,
which means it will be suitable for the vast majority of academic research projects (especially those
within the sciences), whether they are qualitative or quantitative in terms of design. The available
templates may be in the form of a table, chart or a structured framework that extracts some essential
information about every article. I am writing my first lit review within a proposal (rather last minute,
yikes) and this is so helpful to stay organized. In some reviews, the labels and terminology used in
each study are retained when describing the PICO elements of the included studies. Due to recent
issues, most of my classes were cancelled and i was completely lost. Space for comments. As a
measure of the magnitude of effect, for dichotomous outcomes the table will usually provide both a
relative measure (e.g. risk ratio or odds ratio) and measures of absolute risk. Theme: A statement that
presents the central theme of the literary review. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned;
externally peer reviewed. Authors will need to assess whether the measurement methods or tools
used within each study provide an appropriate assessment of the domains ( Chapter 3, Section 3.2.4
). A next step is to group each measure into the pre-specified time points. My question is how do I
get the information I put into my new columns to auto-populate with descriptive statistics on the
Literature Summary page. Expand 16 Save Undertaking a systematic review: the road to successful
completion C. Shuldham S. Fleming J. Yorke Medicine 2008 TLDR The aim of this paper is to
explore the steps involved in undertaking a Cochrane systematic review and to encourage more
nurses to participate in this world wide collaboration to answer questions that are relevant to nursing
practice. After preliminary examination of the outcome data, the review authors changed their
planned intervention groups. Other more detailed guidelines and criteria, such as the Consolidated
Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), as well as articles with recommendations for improving
quality in RCTs and meta-analyses for psychological intervention, are available (4). Tabulation of
extracted data from studies allows assessment of the number of studies contributing to a particular
meta-analysis, and helps determine what other statistical synthesis methods might be used if meta-
analysis is not possible. A meta-analysis is a step forward from a systematic review in that it employs
mathematical and statistical methods to summarise the results of studies included in the systematic
review (1). The aim of developing these literature summary tables is to provide the reader with the
information at one glance. One of the best features of your template is the Literature summary page.
So whatever literature one reviews are meant for re-viewing by others too. It shows how to make a
decent attempt to address the course of your study plan. A background study of the reviewed text
always helps your case.
RJ’s position is supported by the NHMRC Cochrane Collaboration Funding Program and Cabrini
Institute. 9.7 References Chamberlain C, O’Mara-Eves A, Porter J, Coleman T, Perlen SM, Thomas
J, McKenzie JE. If you are conducting an analytical review with a meta-analysis to compare data
outcomes from several clinical trials you may wish to computerize the data collection and analysis
processes. Always cite your sources correctly and paraphrase ideas in your own words while
maintaining the original meaning. A background study of the reviewed text always helps your case.
An important part of planning the analysis strategy is building in contingencies to use alternative
methods when the desired method cannot be used. Table 9.5.a Overview of available methods for
summary and synthesis 9.6 Chapter information Authors: Joanne E McKenzie, Sue E Brennan,
Rebecca E Ryan, Hilary J Thomson, Renea V Johnston Acknowledgements: Sections of this chapter
build on Chapter 9 of version 5.1 of the Handbook, with editors Jonathan Deeks, Julian Higgins and
Douglas Altman. Gradually work to the more specific aspects you will be looking at. Including your
themes in the summary tables (see figure 1 ) demonstrates to the readers that a robust method of data
extraction and synthesis has been followed. All the best for your literature review, and for your
research. Tip 2: include strengths and limitations for each article Critical appraisal of individual
articles included in a review is crucial for increasing the rigour of the review. Can you also assist on
how to build the methodology section of my literature review. Failure to keep track of all the
literature you consume can result in a lot of wasted time. Any cookies that may not be particularly
necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via
analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. For permission to re-
use material from the Handbook (either academic or commercial), please see here for full details.
Your research question tells you which findings are of interest in your research, so work from your
research question to decide what needs to go in each Finding header, and how many findings are
necessary. The process used to undertake these steps is rarely described in reviews, yet can require
many subjective decisions about the nature and similarity of the PICO elements of the included
studies. Elo’s result 2023: Return on investment increased to 6 per cent and cost effi. Discuss any
discrepancies in coding throughout the process. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based
Handbook for Nurses. In other words, it is the process of searching and evaluating the available
literature on your chosen topic. A meta-analysis is a step forward from a systematic review in that it
employs mathematical and statistical methods to summarise the results of studies included in the
systematic review (1). You’d want to list in-depth facts so you are going to have all the information
you want to apply for almost any job. It (Literature Review), in fact, sample survey and survives on
scholarly articles and other sources such as dissertations and conference proceedings. This is
different than a research paper in that a literary review does not add anything new to the field. A
general framework for synthesis can be used to guide the process of planning the comparisons,
preparing for synthesis, undertaking the synthesis, and interpreting and describing the results. For
example, the direction of a standardized mean difference may accidentally be wrong in the review.
Tip 3: write conceptual contribution of each reviewed article While reading and evaluating review
papers, we have observed that many review authors only provide core results of the article included
in a review and do not explain the conceptual contribution offered by the included article. This
process can be done by hand or by using a computer program.? Click an item below to see how it
applies to Step 7: Extract Data from Included Studies. After preliminary examination of the outcome
data, the review authors changed their planned intervention groups. Is it necessary to go down to the
inception of your area of research. If chosen, the electronic document or paper-and-pencil extraction
methods should only be used for small reviews, as larger sets of articles may become unwieldy.
Read the advice for authors page on the journal website, or ask the journal editor to advise you on
what citation format the journal requires you to use. So, whether you are writing a student papers,
dissertations, or scholarly report it is necessary to learn a few tips and tricks to organize your ideas.
Choose the pieces of information you want to collect from each study. PDF version of this page
(470K) Other titles in this collection Advances in Patient Safety Related information PMC PubMed
Central citations PubMed Links to PubMed Similar articles in PubMed It Is Not That Simple nor
Compelling. Too much of a good thing - Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Too much of a
good thing - Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Literature search 1. I am about to start, so
Gradcoach is a source I will be revisiitng. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for
scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. The PRISMA statement can be followed to
ensure reliable coverage of the systematic review methods, results and conclusions. Microsoft
Products (UNC Information Technology Services) Cochrane RevMan RevMan offers collection
forms for descriptive information on population, interventions, and outcomes, and quality
assessments, as well as for data for analysis and forest plots. All of the elements come together to
form a coherent look (synthesis). A meta-analysis aspect is often used in systematic reviews, which
entails using statistical techniques to synthesise data from several studies into a single quantitative
estimation or summary effect size. Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review
search Publishing a search summary table in all systematic reviews would add to the growing
evidence base about information retrieval, which would help in determining which databases to
search for which type of review (in terms of either topic or scope), what supplementary search
methods are most effective, what type of literature is being included, an. It’s usually best to keep
titles as short and descriptive as possible by following this formula: Intervention for those with a
disease (e.g., Dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescent females with a borderline personality
disorder). The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines synthesis as something that is made by combining
different things or the composition or combination of parts or elements so as to form a whole
(Synthesis, n.d.). In other words, building a summary table or synthesis matrix involves taking
information from a variety of sources, evaluating that information and forming new ideas or insights
in an original way. Good synthesis is about putting the data gathered, references read, and literature
analyzed together in a new way that shows connections and relationships. ( Shellenbarger, 2016 ).
The Cochrane Review defines the “summary of findings table” as a structured tabular format in
which the primary findings of a review, particularly information related to the quality of evidence,
the magnitude of the effects of the studied interventions, and the aggregate of available data on the
main outcomes, are presented. Few studies or sparse data, or both, may lead to different groupings
of interventions, populations or outcomes. Door verder gebruik te maken van deze website ga je
akkoord met het gebruik van deze cookies. It’s simpler to delete information than add it in, so err on
the side of adding also rather than too little. Therefore, l og every piece of reading, regardless of
perceived relevance at the time of reading. The form elements may not be changed, and data must be
entered manually. Especially important in a systematic review is the objective, methodologically
sound and reproducible retrieval of the evidence using.search strategies devised by a trained and
experienced information scientist. All the best for your literature review, and for your research. They
are highly customizable, and you can use them in any way you desire. We will review some of the
tools you can use for data extraction, the types of information you will want to extract, and the
options available in the systematic review software used here at UNC, Covidence. The selected
outcomes from applying these rules to studies 3 and 6 are indicated by an asterisk in Table 9.3.b.
Table 9.3.b also illustrates an approach to tabulating the extracted data. You are the type of people we
really need in this planet. Selection of studies After retrieving and reviewing a detailed list of
abstracts, any studies that tend to satisfy inclusion requirements will be collected and thoroughly
reviewed. I am interested in the literature review excel template and the book write smarter not
harder. It’s also crucial to determine what types of experiments to include and exclude (e.g., RCTs
only, RCTs and quasi-experimental designs, qualitative research), the minimum number of
participants in each group, published and unpublished studies, and language restrictions.