Evaluation Matrix - AA - V 1.5
Evaluation Matrix - AA - V 1.5
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step6
Step 7
Evaluation Process
Line items has been divided into following sections and weightages :
Functional Compliance (32%)
Technical Compliance (15%)
Analytics Capabilities (3%)
Regulatory Requirements (2%)
Service and Maintenance (10%)
Project Management (5%)
References (3%)
The above line items were further incorporated within the following 3 sections, Funtional, Technical and Others
In the VED analysis column, classify the requirement as Vital, Essential or Desirable based on its importance to the business
The weightage column will be automatically populated by a numerical figure depending on the category chosen in VED anal
VITAL --- 3
ESSENTIAL --- 2
DESIRABLE --- 1
Next step is to evaluate the vendor meeting the requirement. Based on the output, rate each of the the vendor on the corre
Highest score --- 5
Lowest score --- 1
Score can be anything from 1 to 5
Based on the VED weightage value and the score assigned to the vendor, Solution Capability Weighted Score will be calcula
Solution Capability Weighted Score = Capability score * VED Weightage
Overall Score and Section Weighted score will be calculated automatically for each section based on the section weightage(
Section Weighted Score = Section Score * Category weightage
The % target achieved by vendor would be calculated against the max score possible
Sr No Evaluation Matrix - Broad areas Weightage
1 Functional Compliance 32%
2 Technical Compliance 48%
3 Non-functional/Others 21%
100%
1 Functional Specifications
2 Non-functional Specifications
Functional requirements describe elements of the solution, and what the solution can and must do. Overall understanding of
help determine all the necessary components, features, and functionality of the solution.
Criteria that will be used to judge the operational aspect of the said system
Advanced Analytics and
Sr No Heading
1 Functional Compliance
2 Technical Compliance
3 Non-functional/Others
152
Sr no Key Parameters
Functional Compliance
1 Managed ingestion
2 Metadata Creation
3 Data Governance
4 Data usage
5 ML model development
6 Data Visualization
Technical Compliance
Data Ingestion
Machine learning capability
Overall Weightage
Technical Compliance
Non-functional/Others
Vendor competency to deliver, explain and training
Monitoring Strategy
Incident & Problem Management (Level of logs
available for debugging)
Audit Trails (Debugging, security etc.)
Backup and disaster recovery
Performance Parameters
Storage, Archival and Purging
Project completion timelines
Resource Allocations
Publicly available referenciable big data and data science use cases
Overall Weightage
India market share
Global market share
Others
Advanced Analytics and Machine Learning solution Evaluation M
Weightage
32%
48%
20%
100%
Vital/Essential/
Desirable AWS ( max 5) Azure (max 5) Google (max 5) Max Score
Vital 3 15
Essential 2 10
Essential 2 10
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
49 245
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Essential 2 10
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3
Vital 3 15
Desirable 1 5
Essential 2 10
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Desirable 1 5
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Desirable 1 5
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
73 350
Essential 2 10
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Essential 2 10
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Essential 2 10
Vital 3 15
Vital 3 15
Essential 2 10
30 150
% Req Met
by Google
0%
0%
0%
0%
Remarks
AWS Azure Google AWS Azure
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
Google