0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

Light Diffraction

Uploaded by

shouvikkundu123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

Light Diffraction

Uploaded by

shouvikkundu123
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21
POPULAR PUBLICATIONS 4.9. If W be the width of a grating 4 be the wavelength of the incident light ang 4 = 4 BUT 201 be the diffraction angle then resolving power | 77 ‘| is [wi EVEN) ir i Wa Wsind sind _ a) Wasind » ya ano Answer: (b) Short Answer i ting. What factors does it depend upon? 2.1. Define resolving power of a grating. Sac a (OOO 2 et000) Answer: Resolving power of a plane grating is its ability to just distinguish (resolve) two nearby a spectral lines with two close wavelengths. 77 = nN depends i) order of the spectrum. : ii) increases with total number of lives in the effective part of the grating. iii) does not depend on grating element. 2.2. Show that the intensity of the 1st secondary maxima formed by a single slit Fraunhofer diffraction process is nearly 4.5% of the principal maxima. [WBUT 2012(EVEN), 2015(0DD)] Answer: sin? 8 px From the intensity expression of a single slit diffraction pattern we have, 1 = J, dl; [ 2sin cos A _2sin? B pin Ne op B «97 sin pl 9088 _sinB rising P28 | 0 ie. either sin 8 =0 or # =+mz corresponds to the positions of the minima cosB sinB or, SF SEP =0 or, B-tan f= 0or,|tan B= eo Pp B B=B The root sin #=0. i.e. 9=Ocorresponds to the positions of the central maximum. The other roots of the above equation can be found by plotting y= and y= tang onthe zme sraph paper and then finding the coordinates of the point of intersections shown in igure. The intersections occur at #=1.437, 2.467, etc. Hence the secondary maxima occur at #=1.431, 2.467, etc. é " For /to be minimum 42 = ap PH-72 Taki =022 54 ‘ ing B On all practical purposes, we can find out the magnitudes of the imtensity ‘inci ii ity of the principal maximum (Io), secondary first maximum and so on as follows: (For the principal maximum @=0 +.B =0and I= ly. ( i) For the first secondary maximum P= = sin 3% 5% of the lp] 3a jr 2 Oiginal i inal intensity, which is approximately 4. ion for the intensity due to Fraunhoffer diffraction ina will be modified in case Fraunhoffer diffraction in ondition for interference maxima for Fraunhoffer [WBUT 2014(EVEN)] Wale down an expre: ible st flOw this expression fitragSlt? Explain. Find the ¢ ti Augen” in double slit. gle-slit is POPULAR PUBLICATIONS where B= ane and b be the slit width. intensity distribution due to the double slit diffraction on the basis of the following assumptions. (i) Each point on the slit is a source of secondary wavelets and (ii) The slits consist of a large number-of equally spaced point sources of Huygens’ secondary wavelets sit So resultant intensity due to double slit will be 1(4h a coe r Thus we see that the resultant intensity in the diffraction pattern of two slits depends upon two factors — 1 Plug XL = sesh which gives the diffraction pattern due to a single slit. I, =c0s y which gives a system of interference fringes due to wavelets from the Ld, loo corresponding points of the two slits. Interference maxima: From the term [,, =cos* y the maxima occur for the values of @ for which cos? y =1or, y=+na where n=1,2,3,....except 0 _xdsind_x(a+b)sind a——_— where d = a+bis the distance between two corresponding points of the double-slit or, (a+5)sin@ = 4nd or, (a+5)O=4nd — [*r whend +0, sind 6] na _ A 2A BA - a+b atb'at+b'at+b or, y nt or, = a) 4 So, the angular separation between two consecutive interference maxima is AO =—~— a+ 2.4, What is missing order in double slit diffraction pattern? - Explain graphically. [WBUT 2015(00D)] Answer: Sometimes, for a particular angle of diffraction @ certain interference maxima falls on the position of certain order of diffraction minima then those interference maxima will be missing. These missing orders rather spectra are termed as missing orders in diffraction. The direction of interference maxima are given by (a+b)sin@=nA and direction of diffraction minima is given by asin@=m2. So by dividing these two expression We . Where n and m both are integers ive., 1, 2, 3, 4... etc. PH-74 NGINEERING PHYSIC then from the above relation we have n=3m=3,6.9, ete, m=1,2,3,--] If a=- thus the third, sixth, ninth interference ; pl maxima wil pun wll Contain merece eens Wil Be absent. The central difaction Missing orders for 26 = a apt do you mean by absent spectra in the diffraction pattern of grating? [WBUT 2016(EVEN)] Answer: Sometimes, for a particular angle of diffraction @ certain interference maxima falls on the position of certain order of diffraction minima then those interference maxima will be missing. These missing orders rather spectra are termed as missing orders in diffraction and the corresponding spectrum is called absent spectra. @=nA and direction of The direction of interference maxima are given by (a+b)sin @=mA. So by dividing these two expression we diffraction minima is given by asin have (272)siN8 _ 1 Where mand m both are integers ie. 1.2,3,4,-...€ asin@ m If a =2h, then from the above relation we have n= 3m =3,6,9, ete. a will be absent. The central diffraction the third, sixth, ninth interference maxim: maximum will contain 5 interference maxima. [WBUT 2017(0DD)] 2. fhat is Rayleigh criterion of resolution? Jeulate the least width that a grating must have to resolve two ‘components of the grating having 800 lines/cm. The the sodium D-lines in the second order, wavelength of D, and D, lines of sodium are 5893A and 6896 A respectively. . Thus Answer: q a) Refer to Question No. 3. 4(d). ing the resented by Aw. Now on substi b) Resolving power of a grating is rep 5893 _ 5993,dé=3 and w-2. we have N === 982.17 wupplied value i.e. 982.17 _ | 2277 em least will be ——— st width will be 55 PH-75 34. a) Prove that the intensity of secondary maxima formed for Fraunhofer diffraction at a single slit are of decreasing order. [WBUT 2009(EVEN)) Answer: in? . Sabai eee sin? B ‘As we know that intensity distribution due to a single slit is given by = JF where Jo represents the intensity at = 0. Position of Maxima and Minima: Variation of intensity with fis shown in the figure (J) It is obvious from the above mathematical expression that for B=nz[n#0] intensity become zero, n being integer. for, pore 1=[yS0. for f=Owe get the central bright maximum, for, Beant zasinO vv. =nn Fs ~. asin @ = nA which is the condition for minima, [where n= +1,22,+3etc ] In order to determine the positions of maxima we differentiate intensity expression with respect to b and set it equal to zero. (as per theory of calculus) Thus (egee _2si Fe The condition #=0 corresponds to maxima. The conditions for other maxima are roots of the following transcendental equation tan f= (maxima) The root #=0, corresponds to central maximum. The other roots can be found by determining the points of intersection of the curve y = # and y = tan f (Fig, Il). The intersection occurs at = 1.431, B= 2.46n etc, and are known as the first maximum, the second maximum etc. PH-76 ENGINEERING PHYSICS satis is about 0,04: ee 96, Putting f sine?) 430 ; utting these Bs in the intensity expression we get ipeintensity | falls rapidly from jy yyIna plane transmission grating the a avelength 5x10" tne grating surface, in one centimetre of Answer! [WBUT 2009(EVEN)] from the relation (a +b)sin@ = na sind vehave TZ (avb) {where the symbols have their usual meaning} On putting the data given we have v= —Sin30_ 2x5x10 32 a) Derive the intensity distribution of diftr due to = 5000 lines per cm ° tion of Fraunhofer class of light ingle slit. Sketch the intensity distribution. [WBUT 2010(00D)] oR, Show that intensity distribution for diffract zbsind . tion in a single slit is given by, lel, 22) were B= B » where symbols have their usual significance. [WBUT 2017(0DD)) Answer: In order to calculate the intensity distribution due to diffraction on the screen PQ ( which is placed at the focal plane of the lens L) we will make the following assumptions. |. Each point on the slit is a source of secondary wavelets. Interfemnce takes place between the wavelets originating from two such secondary sources. 2. The slit consists of a large number of secondary point sources wich are equispaced, Let us assume that a plane wave front of monochromatic light of wavelength i be incident normally on a narrow slit AB of width b placed perpendicular to the plane of the paper {shown in the figure 2]. 16 be the separation between any two point sources x)... b=(n-1)6 (1) Where nis the number of point sources. Caleutation of Intensity distribution As the point P on the screen is at a large distance from large distance from the slit the Amplitudes of the secondary waves from x, and x, will be nearly the same. If the then Gifacted rays from x, and x,make an angle 4 with the normal to the plane of the slit then the path difference between them is 4x, = sind, where xx =o POPULAR PUBLICATIONS The corresponding disturbance is = (asin 2) Fig: Ray diagram ofa single slit diffraction So. if the field at O due to disturbance coming from x, be represented by E, =acosat Where a is the amplitude and @ the circular frequency then the field at O' due to the disturbance from x, is E, = acos(a - 4) Similarly, the fields at O due to the disturbances from xy4.4y..-0-1%y 1 ATE E, =acos(at ~26), E, = acos(w! -36),..... E, = acos[ ax -(n~1)¢] Thus the resultant field (£) at Q’ is the superposition of all such fields i-e., E=E, +E tb tnt E, = al cosay + cos(ar -4)+c0s(av-24)+...+e0s[ar—(n-1)6]] 2) Now ae cosax +cos (ax -9) + -teas[at (0-6 ]= 2 os r-L(n-1)6] sin— 2 sin ; E= a Leos on -Sn-1)6]- E,os| on —Ln-1)6| ww (4) sin$ a sin 2 where E, = A sin? 2 Now, ifn —> 2, 8+ 0 then nd — b [From (1)] Lng nda.) and. xbsind - J osin8 =F sin = ae (6) PH-78 | () (8) % and if mis very large 24 9, 1 ng _ xbsing i: $ 3(r-Ipe eS Sousing (9) in (4) we have, swe(10) Where amplitude of the resultant field is 4 a The intensity distribution on the sereen due to the diffraction atthe single-slit is pice. ayy where J, n° a° is the intensity at @ — 0. fan (I) shows that the intensity at any point on the screen PQ is a function of # and hence, 8 (: paz: ne), This shows that a series of alternate maxima and minima of ‘intensity will be oblained on the screen. + Intensity (1) Intensity — Amotitude Fig Intensity distribution with phase 4) A singte sii tion pattern of Fraunhofer class with white light. The Second emis tecaea for ved light of wavelength 7000 A coincides “the third maxi ‘of an unknown wavelength. Calculate the unknown wave length mur [WBUT 2010(0DD)) PH-79 ULAR PUBLIC: Answer: Using the maxima condition, asin @ =(2n+ NF 3.3. A plane transmission grating having 1500 lines/inch is being used under normal incidence of light. i) What is the longest wavelength of light for which a spectrum can be seen? ii) What is the highest order spectrum that can be seen for the light of 589.3 iim wavelength? ili) The spectral line of 589.3 nm in the second order spectrum overlaps with another spectral line in the next order. Find wavelength of the other ‘spectral lin iv) Find the expression of the dispersive power for a given order. ¥)_ If 80% of the width of the grating is covered, how the width of the spectral lines are changed? [WBUT 2011(EVEN)] Answer: j) From the formula of grating spectrum (a+5)sin@ = nd wavelength will be longest when @= 90° and n=l. So (a+b)=A. 7 2.54 So the required wavelength dary 7 1693334 ii) The order number will be highest when 8 =.90° for a given wavelength. So (i -S b)_ 2.54 ae 2 1500 5893x10* Hence upto 28" order spectrum can be seen properly. =28.7 iii) According to the given problem nd, =(n+1)4, >= So, iv) We know the grating equation as ¢sin8, Differentiating both sides we have 4c0s0,d, = nda dé, So, Th” Teosd, Which is the required formula of dispersive power ofa grating for ., = 392.87 nm given order n. PH-80 ENGINEERING PHYSICS «) Width of the spectral line of a grating spectrum is given by AO here d is = where d i Nd cos jidth of the grati the wid Brating plate, N and 2 be the grating constant and wavelength spectively iF 90% of the width of the grating plate is covered i., 10% is open. So in the above ion d reduces to 10%, So 22 prs "6. So 7 ie. spectral width will increase by 10%, eae esiren Fresnel and Fraunhofer class of diffraction. ss at at Ky snot diffraction intensity, show that the secondary ma quation tan «= d, where = pee a veconi. where a =e sind/2, symbols have ¢) Draw and explain the intensity di Core ee ad Istribution curve in case of Fraunhofer single 9 state 7 explain Rayleigh criterion of resolution. ¢) An oil immersion microscope just resolves the rulings of a grating hi g having 3900 linesimm when light of wavelength 400 nm is employed. Find the numerical aperture of the lens. [WBUT 2012(0DD)] Answer: 1) Distinguish between Fresnel and Fraunhofer class of diffraction: Fresnel Diffraction Fraunhofer Diffraction i) The source or the screen or both are finite] i) The source and the screen on which the| distances from the aperture or obstacle|pattern is observed are at infinite distances causing diffraction. from aperture or the obstacle causing) diffraction, TD No lens is required 10 make the rays| ii) Two lens are required to get diffraction| parallel or convergent. pattern. One is used to make the light from the light source parallel before it falls on the aperture and the other is used to focus the light after diffraction on the screen. )) The incident wave front is plane. [Secondary wavelets originated from the [blocked portions of the wave front. iv) The secondary wavelets are in same phase at every point in the plane of the| aperture y) The resultant diffraction pattern on the| screen are due to the interference between| parallel rays which are brought into focus’ ‘with the help of a convex lens. lil) Incident wave front is not plane but cither spherical or cylindrical. iv) The phase of secondary wavelets is not ithe same at all points in the plane of the| |sperture or the obstacle causing diffraction. ”) Wave fronts are divided into small ¢lements or zones called Fresnel's zone. The} resultant effect at any point on the screen Is the combined effect of all the secondary Waves originating from varius Zones. po PH-81 POPULAR PUBLICATIONS in? I 2 4 b) Single slit diffraction intensity is given by / = lo 75 where I, = 4’ =1°a? is the intensity at © —> 0, a is the amplitude of the diffracted beam and diffraction angle 9 £SiN@ where width of the narrow slitis e sin’ dt We have from above expression, / = /, 4 a 7 2sinacosa _2sin’a ae For / to be minimum dbxy . da «57 gin ql £O8@_sina]_ 2 angina 2 -te|-0 ice. either sina =0 or a = mz corresponds to the positions of the minima cosa_sina or, SS -S0E 0 or, —tanar=0or, [lana=a] hence proved °) “ah hath ° . a (i) For the principal maximum 0=0 -.B=Oand I=1,. (ii) For the first secondary maximum p= % _3n) Prey jose (3 J Aly ly thal) => sote ae 2 (il) For the second secondary maximum p= 5%. 4 : ) =e 2/2 and so on 5n/2. 25x" i PH-82 ENGINEERING PHYS| umber - fs the secondary maxima occur at =0, 1.43% ; 2.461, et i reondary maxima are not equi-spaced tc. it is evident that the 4) According to rayleigh criterion, equal brightness are said to be just central maximum of one coincides ‘ice versa. (shown in fig below) In case of two close spectral lines of wave lengths A and A+dA where d?. is very small , the two specral lines will be just resolved when the central maximum of 2 falls on the first minimum due to other wavelength 2+da. the images of two closely spaced point sources of resolved by the optical system, if the position of the With the first secondary minimum of the other and 3.5. a) What is missing order in case of double slit diffraction pattern? [WBUT 2013(EVEN), 2016(EVEN)] Answer: The direction of interference maxima are given by (a+6)sin@= nA. and direction of diffraction minima is given by asin@ = mA. So by dividing these two expression we ie (a+b)sind _n asind=ndm Asit is given that a = 0.6mm = 0.016em and b = 0.8mm = 0.08cm. Hence 2.016+0.080 _n 4. "6 on=6m 0.016 mom 2,3....etc, n= 6, 12, 18......ete of interference maxima are missing. For m= ») A diffraction grating, 2 em wide is just able to resolve sodium D-lines (having . in second order. Find the number of rulings per wavelengthe 689 nm and 689.6 nm) mor of rue Par Answer; Resolving Power of a grating 4 =nN Given n=2, 2. = 5890 A = 5890 x 10° cm. dA = (5896 - 5890) = 6 A = 6x 10" cm PH-83 btai Maxima anal nics ue for resultant intensity and Single-stit Fraunhofer diffraction aes “ONditiong for Explain Fra Mhofer diffra, OR, ileal 2013(E VEN © graphi Ire) entatie roe, 8 Single-stit with necessary theory Poj nswe of intensity distribution, [Weur 2orscevene ¢) According to ra Refe; to Z ual brightness ar “fe Question No. 3.2 and 3.1(b), central maximum g i . (Shown j 3.6. a) Prove that the j incase oft . = Ntensity of i diffraction ata single Slit are of docreannonaary meme rmed for Fraunhoter ) Explain missi '9 Order in N-slit diffraction, Cc) State Rayleigh Criterion, In case of two clog, - Write a short n the two specral line first minimum. due t ote on resolving Power of a Grating, Anse: [weut 2014(0DD) a) Refer ito Question No. 3.1(b). b) Itis defined as the r; in the wave length o a double slit discussed earlier, the slit Width is taken as a Mathematically it is and separations between the slits be b. | Direction of interference maxima are given as (a+b)sin@d=n4 where n=0;], can be resolved by t ( i ue Resolving Power of The direction of diffraction minima are 5 sa vine Pome o ake suis rib ap dugp oe h ihe > i ly for Wave lengths whict hi lues of a and b are such that both (1) and (2) are Satisfied simultaneously Ma maximune toch peed valida of @, then the Positions of certain interference maxima corresponds to (asmiaet ame va mn | diffraction minima at the same position on the screen. ~ tren ee 7 ee 3,...]- (a+)sin( Pace = =3,6,9, ete.['° m=1,2, ‘ ee ei lacus ial mee béent The a diffraction The Wo lines will i i i interference maxima will be al ; the third, sixth, ninth in n a aes will contain 5 interference maxima [Fig] m E’SPonds to the di Tangle of diffrac ortsPonding points Nes in, the grating PH-84 ENGINEERII o Missing orders for 26 = a 7 Baal ; 2 Cea rayleigh criterion the images of two closely spaced point sources of el ane a 0 be just resolved by the optical system, if the position of the eee a ae les with the first secondary minimum of the other and In case of two close spectral lines of wave the two specral lines will be just resolved when t first minimum due to other wavelength 2+dA. lengths 2.and A+dA where di is very small . he central maximum of ?. falls on the he spectrum to the least difference ofa line int just be seen as separate. io of the wave length jext line that can ji where dA is the difference o! It is defined as the rat in the wave length of the n £ two wave length which a Mathematically it is equal of 77 stem. can be resolved by the optical sy: ing Power of a grating: = r Resolving Power 1 A power is the capacity to form separate diffraction maxima of two Ih other, The direction of the nth primary For a grating, Fe gratin ‘which are very close 10 eacl wave length clos veximum for a wave length 2. is given by (a+b)sind, =" mel) ‘The direction of the nth primary maximum for a wave length ( A +dA)is given by. Q) (4, +do,)=n(a+d4) resolve first secondary min n amount d Jit changes by A /N w' (a+b)sin| ‘The two lines will appear just “ads to the direction of the ‘action @ changes by a fe of diffr ‘ding points of two consecutive s he grating. d if the angle of diffraction (8, +49,) also imum after nth primary maximum. or @ the path difference between the correspon hhen N is the total number of lines int PH-85 POPULAR PUBLICATIONS Now, the condition for the first secondary minimum in the nth order spectrum can be obtained by introducing additional path difference 4 to eqn. (1) we have, (a+5)sin(8, +48.) =na +4 8) Now, comparing (2) & (3) we have, n(a+da)=nd+% N or, ndd a wa . . a c ". <= nN which is the required expression for resolving power ofa grating 3.7. a) A single slit Fraunhofer diffraction pattern is formed using white light at normal incidence. For what wavelength of light does the third maximum coincides jength 4000 4? with the fourth minimum for light of wa’ b) What is Rayleigh’s criterion? c) Two spectrum line (4 = 6200.4) have a separation of 0.652 4. Find the minimum number of lines a diffraction grating must have to just resolve the doublet in the second-order spectrum. [WBUT 2015(EVEN)] Answer: a) for minimum bsin@ = mA = 4x 4000 A =16000A .and for 3% maximum p= 22 =228in8 _, 16000 a: 7 a > A=4571A required wavelength b) Refer to Question No. 3.6(d). c) Resolving power will be mn = 2-52 N = £200. y = £200 aA — = = 4754.601 = 4755 minimum number of lines 0.652 0.6522 3.8. a) What is the difference between single-slit and double-slit diffraction pattern? [WBUT 2015(0DD)] Answer: The single slit diffraction pattern consists of a central principal maximum with secondary maxima and minima on either side. The intensity of secondary maxima gradually decreases. PH-86 ENGINEERING PHYSICS ‘The double slit diffraction pattern consists u 0 of a central maximum whi i spaced interference maxima and minima, The intensity of central ditren onmene four times ue intensity of the central maximum due to diffraction at singles In double slit diffraction pattern, the spaci i aps t diffraction the spacing of the diffraction maxima and mini deve on sit an a’. The spacing of the interference maxima and minima depends on (att), when i the width of the opaque space between the two slits. The intensity of the ‘axima and minima is not constant, but decreases to zero on either side of the central maximum. b) A parallel beam of light of wavelen gth 5890A falls normally on a pl transmission grating having 4250 line/cm. Find the angle of ditfraction for maximum intensity in first order. [WBUT 2015(0DD)] Answer: No of line per cm = 4250 per cm. Grating element (a +6) = 1/4250 = 2.35 x10“cm. Now, using (a +5)sin 8 = nd.we have (2.35x10™)sind = 24 2a 2x5890%10" _2x5890x10" _ 9 59 sin@ =~ on, (235x107) — (2.35x10~) or, 9=30 which is the required angle of reflection. tensity distribution on the screen due to single slit 1a. Hence show that ' a) Starting from the in ‘ctiof, deduce the conditions for maxima and minim adifum Ii .d in central bright fringe. [WBUT 2016(EVEN)] d mi ht is containe Answer: Ws able The intensity distribution on the sereen due to the diffraction at the single-slit is a 11h &; (1). absind where J, is the intensity at @— Oand B= Eqn (1) shows that the intensity at any point on the screen PQ is a function of B and hence, This shows that a series of alternate maxima and minima of intensity will be obtained on the screen. sin 08i08 59 and lin FE +1 é When f= A This corresponds to the principal maximum which occurs in the region of the screen when 8 9% ie. 070. From eqn. (1) it is clear that J = 0, when sinf=0, ie. when f=tmz, where m= 1,2,3y0 = Q) ie sos’ =4nor, bsind =+md PH-87 POPULAR PUBLICATIONS Eqn. (2) gives the condition of diffraction minima. Th The value of 6 =0 i isi because this corresponds ‘ the position of the principal maxima. Seon sin’. dls, [2sinBoosf_ 2sin’ B B ap ° Bw B oop ae qf e088 _ sin B = 2sing| af |-0 ie. either sin 8 = 0 or 8 =+mz corresponds to the positions of the minima Wehaveegn.(1) 1=y For Ito be minimum 22 ap B The root sin 3 = other roots can be found by plotting y= Band y= tan f on the s then finding the coordinates of the point of intersections. The intersections occur at B=1.437, 2.4677, etc. Hence the secondary maxima occur at B=1.432, 2.467, etc. 3a St A 7 . = for all practical purposes, we can find out the magnitudes of the or, cop SP =o or, B-tanB=0or,[tanB=A] 0) 0. ie. @=Ocorresponds to the positions of the central maximum, The ‘ame graph paper and Taking B= intensity of the principal maximum (Io), (i) For the principal maximum 8 =0 secondary first maximum and so on as follows: 2B =Oand! =1,- . 3. (ii) For the first secondary maximium B= Aly «fo. 9n* 22 =I1,|—— sen 7 iii) For the second secondary maximum pz 4h _ 1s and so on 2 = 15) 250° he principal maximum .s on either side of Jo intensity of t! is the highest and the intensity een with the increase of the order This indicates that the ma decrease’ of the secondary maxi number 77. reas we do for sound waves fraction of light waves whe! f waves thematically. What will happe? (- tra it diffraction set-up? Give b) Why don’t we observe di [weuT 2016(EVEN)] ‘dinary circumstances? Expla raid a ing the slit widths of double sli keep on reduc vesthematical results to support your answer. PH-88 ENGINEERING PHYSICS Answer The diffraction equation is asin@=nA where a is the width of the slit ic. size of the obstacle and @ be the angle of diffraction, Due to the dependence of sind on the wavelength, for a given order (n), the amount of diffraction will vary depending on wavelength. As -ISsin@<1 so for diffraction 4 <1 must be satisfied. But the a wavelength of sound waves is much longer than the wavelength of light and in ordinary .. f Ass Ais circumstances @ ranges in em order. So ~ is satisfied the above condition. Hence a diffraction of sound wave occurs in ordinary circumstances. The fringe width increases but the brightness remains unchanged. As we know fringe separation is AX = Xaet — Xa =(n+1) A D/a— nd Dia = Da Where a is slit width and D is the distance between slit and sereen ‘Asa’ reduces Ax increases and it does not affect intensity. ¢) Calculate the distance at which a millimetre scale would appear blurred to a human eye. (Take the diameter of the pupil to be 2mm and 2 =600 nm). [WBUT 2016(EVEN)] Answer: The angular separation can be calculated as 224 1.22x600x10" _ 5 66.10% rad Ad= — D 2x10 7 op where A@is the angular separation and D is the diameter of the lens i.e., pupil. are ‘Again on using 40=—T wwe have the distance L = A0xare=3 3x10? x1=3.3x10? mm or 3.3 mt. 5 of 4-589 nm and 2 =589.6 nm can be clearly 'd order by diffraction grating of 2. cm width and ) Examine if the two spectral line [WBUT 2016(EVEN)] fesolved in (i) first order (ii) secont 425 lines/om- Answer? i, Aaa power for grating is 75 ="N- Resolving (38908 589.) _ 549 3mm We use wavelength a= 589.3x10" eri = — 2802 XT = 982,16 = 982 p rors order! N= 96.197 1 jven grating has number of Hines. So minimum number of lines in the grating is put the # 982 _ 491 lines per em. 2 PH-89 A> ao» eo” te oe enema ae a i tl Re a a ae a i b) In Young’s doubi le slit experim ie Wavel; ent, the distan and th sncrees ie Sere light used is Soe A and ‘the someon the Ba, its Is 0.5 mom, Answer: ©™- Calculate the fringe width in th n the sou is case. [WBUT 2018(0DDy, Using the formula g — 22 a where @ is the fringe width 5000 x10 * We have, B= 0s Teeem =0.025cm c) In Newton’s ring experiment the diameter of the 42% ring changes from 1.50 cm to 1.35 cm, when a liquid is introduced between the lens and the plate. Calculate the refractive index of liquid. (WBuT 2016(0DD)] Answer: 4naR : For liquid medium Dj? = 9742 ang for air Di =4naR Dt Dividing the above two we have “2 Given Dj, =1.35 and D,, =1.50 2 1.50) _ So we have w= (+3) = 1.235 ow ntens' for ract in le slit is given by, thi tel for diffraction in a single slit is given b) d) Sh ity distribution ) at ii 0 [WBUT 2016(0DD)] dq yer ee b ced at the focal plane of oo Each point on the sit is between the wavelets 952 2, The slit consists equispaced. us assume that a Plane ident normally on a per» . oe be the separation between b=(n-1)5 where 7 is the number Of point 5 fa calculate the intensity , of a | Wave si an Galeulation of Intensity distrip Asthe point P on the screen is amplitudes of the secondary w ffracted rays from x, and ea then the path difference between ‘The corresponding disturbance j + y ae ees et = sii Ray Svitthe field at O” due to di E,=acosat “here @ is the amplitude an “turbance from x, is E, = Similarly the fields at 0’ dy ENGINEERI Answer! In order to calculate the intensity distribution due to diffraction on the screen PQ (which is placed at fe focal plane of the lens ) we will make the following assumptions. 1 Bash point on the slit is a source of secondary wavelets. Interfemce takes place Ae the males originating from two such secondary sources. eee nsists of a large number of secondary point sources wich are Let us assume that a plane wave front of monochromatic light of wavelength 7 be incident normally on a narrow slit AB of width & placed perpendicular to the plane of the paper . If 5 be the separation between any, two point sources x), X)5 %y5 +--+ then b=(n-1)5 2s. (I) where m is the number of point sources. Calculation of Intensity distribution: As the point P on the screen is at a large distance from large distance from the slit the amplitudes of the secondary waves from x, and x, will be nearly the same. If the diffracted rays from x, and x, make an angle @ with the normalto the plane of the slit then the path difference between them is xx} = sin, where xx = 6 a eae The corresponding disturbance is =F (6sind) +a Ray diagram ofa single slit diffraction So, ifthe field at 0" duet? disturbance coming from x, be represented by E, where i disturbance from % " the fields at cos at .s the ampl jitude and @ the circular frequency then the field at O' due to the = acos(at-9) € due to the disturbances from x, x,, x, are Similarly, PH-91 POPULAR PUBLICATIONS F,

You might also like