Buckling and Stability of Columns
Buckling and Stability of Columns
UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING
& TECHNOLOGY LAHORE
DESIGN CONSIDERATION OF STRUCTURE
Actual
center line
Theoretical
center line
e = Total eccentricity e et e p
et = Theoretical eccentricity
ep = Loading eccentricity P P.e
Z = section Modulus
A Z
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 10
CRITICAL LOAD OF COLUMNS
The critical load of as slender bar (columns) subjected to axial
compression is that value of the axial load that is just sufficient
to keep the bar a slightly deflected configuration.
Case-I: P < Pcr P < Pcr P = Pcr P > Pcr
Stable Equilibrium and No Buckling
Case-II: P = Pcr
Equilibrium State and Slight deflection
Case-III: P > Pcr
Unstable State and Buckling d
d2y P
(1) EI 2 P. y Let k 2
( 4)
dx EI
d 2 y P. y d2y
2
0 (3) ( 4) 2
k 2
y 0 (5)
dx EI dx
sin kL 0 (8) ( 4) k
P
EI
To satisfy the Eqn. (8) P
(9) .L n
kL n (radian) (9) EI
n 2 2 EI
n = 1, 2, 3, …. P (10)
L2
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 14
n values of 1, 2, 3, represent the buckling
shape (eigenvalue) corresponding to 1st,
2nd and 3rd buckling mode shape,
respectively.
The smallest (critical) value load, Pcr
occurs when n = 1, which corresponding
to first (least) buckling mode.
2 EI
Pcr 2
(11)
L
Euler’s Curve 2E
σcr (Elastic Buckling)
cr
( Le / r ) 2
30 100 KL / r
Short Intermediate Long Columns
Columns Columns (KL / r)max
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 25
Rankin-Gordon Formula
Euler formula is only suitable for the slender columns with
small imperfections. In practice, most of the intermediate
columns fail due to the combined effect of compression and
flexure and experimentally obtained results are much less than
the Euler prediction.
Gordon suggested an empirical formula based on the
experimental results to predict the load of intermediate
columns, which was further modified by Rankin.
According to Rankin intermediate columns/members fail due
to buckling and compression to more or less degree and load
carrying capacity of such member can be calculated as
following.
1 1 1 Pc Pe Pc
PR (16)
PR Pc Pe Pc Pe 1 Pc / Pe
y .A y .A y .A
(16) PR
y .A y . ALe 2
y Le 2
1 2 1 2 1 2 .
EI Le 2
E ( Ar ) 2
E r
y .A
PR 2
(17)
Le
1 a
r a = Rankin constant, which
y depends upon the boundary
a 2
E condition and material properties
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 27
Graphical Presentation of Rankin Formula
Data
σy = 550 MPa , F.O.S. = 4.0
Do = 200.0 mm K = 0.5 ( both Ends fixed)
t = 20 mm a= 1 / 1600
Psafe = PR / FOS
y .A
PR 2
Le
1 a
r
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 29
Practice Problem
For the given data determine the length of the Column for
which Euler formula cease to apply.
Data
σy = 325 MPa , E = 200 GPa
Do = 38.0 mm L = 2.25 m
Di = 33.0 mm K = 1.0 ( both Ends pinned)
a= 1 / 7500
cr 2E 1 12 2 E
all
2
. (19)
FOS ( Le / r ) FOS 23 ( Le / r ) 2
Short Column
Le
If Rc Its short / Intermedioate column
r
The short column are designed on the base of an empirical
formula which is parabolic in form and maximum stress by
this formula is given as following.
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 33
Le / r 2
max 1
2 y
(20)
2 Rc
5 3 Le / r 1 Le / r
3
FOS (21)
3 8 Rc 8 Rc 3
max
all (22)
FOS
FOS becomes 5/3 or 1.67 when
Le /r = 0 and increases to 1.92 or
23/12 at slenderness value equal
to Rc.
All the above equation may be
used both in SI and FPS
System.
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 34
Example Problem
Determine the allowable axial load (Pallow) for a W310x129
wide-flange steel column with both end pinned, for the
following lengths.
(a) L = 6 m (b) L = 9 m
Assume E = 200 GPa and σy = 340 MPa
Data
For W310x129 Section
A= 16,500 mm2 σy = 340 MPa
rz = ry = 78.0 mm E = 200 GPa
K = 1.0 ( both Ends pinned)
M Q M A P. y
= M Q P (e y )
d2y P
(1) EI 2 P(e y ) Let k2 ( 4)
dx EI
d 2 y P. y P.e d2y
2
( 24) ( 24) 2
k 2
y k 2
e (25)
dx EI EI dx
kL kL kL
(27) ymax e tan sin cos 1
2 2 2
sin 2 kL / 2 cos 2 kL / 2
ymax e 1 The Eqn. (29) shows that (ymax)
cos kL / 2 becomes infinite when P = P .
cr
kL
ymax e sec 1 (28) 2 EI L
2 ymax e sec 1
EIL 2
2
P
(4) k
EI ymax e sec 1
2
P L
ymax e sec 1
(29)
EI 2 sec
2
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 39
In actual cases deflection does not become infinite even the
load exceed the elastic limits also P should not be reached to
the Pcr (Euler critical load)
2 EI Pcr L2
Pcr EI
L2
2
Replacing the value of EI in
Eqn. (29)
P 2 L
ymax e sec 1
Pcr L 2
2
Source of eccentricity in
P column
ymax e sec 1 (30)
2 Pcr
kL P L P
Replacing the value of kL /2 as following
2 EI 2 2 Pcr
P ec P
(32) max 1 2 sec (33)
A r 2 Pcr
In Eqn. (41) & (42) y and ym are the additional deflection due
to the applied P as compared to the initial deflection a0.
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 54
Using Eqn. (42)
if P 0.2 Pcr ym 0.25a0
if P 0.5 Pcr ym a0
if P 0.75 Pcr ym 3a0
if P 0.9 Pcr ym 9a0
( L / 2) cr cr
yt max a0 sin a0 (45)
L cr cr
P M max c cr
max (46) max 1 (47)
A I cr
P P( yt ) max c
max
a0 c
2 Initial deflection ratio
A Ar 2 r
cr averge applied stress
Pa0 c
P cr cr Euler critical stress
max
A Ar 2
If applied load P is given the
P a0 c cr
max 1 2 maximum stress can be
A r cr
determined by using the Eqn. (47)
By Dr. Nauman KHURRAM Department of Civil Engineering, UET Lahore 58
If σmax are specified then to determine the safe applied load
the Eqn. (47) is to transformed in term of applied stress σ.
cr cr
(47) max 1 cr
cr cr
max . cr cr 2 cr
2 max cr cr max cr 2 max (1 cr ) max cr 0
1
max (1 ) cr 1 max (1 ) cr 2 max cr (48)
2 4
1
2
y (1 ) cr
1
4
y (1 ) cr 2 y cr (48)