SSPC-Guide to VIS 2

June 1. 2000

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings

GUIDE TO VISUAL STANDARD NO. 2

Standard Method of
Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces

3.3 If there is a conflict between the requirements of any

1. Scope
of the cited reference standards and this specification, the
requirements of this specification shall prevail.
1.1 This standard provides a method to evaluate the
degree of rusting on painted steel (or iron) surfaces. The
3.4 SSPC STANDARDS AND JOINT STANDARDS:
reference color photographs and corresponding black and
VIS 1 Visual Standardfor Abrasive Blast
white images, which depict the percentage of rusting given
Cleaned Steel
in the written specification, form part of the standard. In the
VIS 3 Visual Standard For Power- and
event of a dispute, the written definitions prevail.
Hand-Tool Cleaned Steel
VIS WNACE No. 7 Interim Guide and Visual Refer-
1.2 This standard is particularly useful for evaluating
ence Photographs for Steel
rust on test panels or on localized areas of structures. (See
Cleaned by Water Jetting
Section 7.1 .)
3.5 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATE-
2. Description RIALS (ASTM) STANDARD:
D 610 Standard Method of Evaluationg Degree
2.1 This standard quantifies the degree of rusting on of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces
painted steel surfaces with a zero to ten scale based on the
percentage of visible rust present on the surface. Visible 3.6 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STAN-
rust includes rust blisters and undercutting of the coating. DARDIZATION (ISO):
(See Section 7.3.) 4628-3 Paints and varnishes - Evaluation of deg-
radation of paint coatings - Designation of
2.2 The distribution of the rust is classified as spot rust, intensity, quantity and size of common
general rust, or pinpoint rust. types of defect - Part 3: Designation of
degree of rusting
2.3 Standard reference photographs depict the appear-
ance of painted steel surfaces with the appropriate percent- 4. Rust Grade Scale
age of rusting for various distributions of the rust. The
rusting depicted in the photographs is not accompanied by
4.1 The painted steel surface to be evaluated for degree
blistering, but the photographs show staining associated
of rusting shall be assigned a rust grade based on the
with the rust. Black and white images highlight only those
percentage of visible rust on the surface. The rust grade
areas that are rusted. Both the color photographs and the
scale is defined in Table 1. The scale and description shown
black and white images enable the evaluator to assign an
in Table 1 shall be used in conjunction with the photographic
accurate rust grade.
reference standards. (See Notes 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3.)

3. Reference Standards 5. Rust Distribution

3.1 The standards listed here are referenced only in the
5.1 SPOT RUSTING: Spot rusting occurswhen the bulk
Notes, which are not requirements of this specification.
of the rusting is concentrated in a few localized areas of the
painted surface. The reference photographs depicting this
3.2 The latest issue, revision, or amendment of the
type of rusting are labeled 9-S through 1-S. (See Note 9.4.)
referenced standards in effect on the date of invitation to bid
shall govern unless otherwise specified.

37
COPYRIGHT The Society for Protective Coatings
Licensed by Information Handling Services
 SSPC- Guide to VIS 2
June 1. 2000

for three different rust distributions. Each color photograph

TABLE 1- SCALE AND DESCRIPTION OF RUST
and black and white image are labeled with the correspond-
GRADES
ing numerical rust grade followed by a letter indicating the
type of rust distribution. The percentage of visible rust isalso
shown with each reference photograph. No photographs are
Percent of Surface used to depict rust grade 10 (less than 0.01 percent rust) or
Rust Grade Rusted to depict rust grade O (over 50 percent rust). (See Note 9.5.)
ILess than or equal to
1O 0.01 percent - 7. Procedures
9
Greater than 0.01
Ipercent to 0.03 percent
IGreater than 0.03
9-s 9-G I
I
9-P
7.1 SELECT AREA: Select the area which is to be
8 percent to 0.1 percent 8-S 8-G 8-P evaluated for degree of rusting. This area may be as small
- as a test panel or as large as the hull of a ship. For complex
Greater than 0.1 to 0.3
7 percent 7-s 7-G 7-P structures, each member may be evaluated as a whole, or
Greater than 0.3 percent different sections may be evaluated separately (e.g., top of
6 to 1 percent 6-S 6-G 6-P flange, web of a beam, or edges).
-
Greater than 1 percent
5 to 3 percent 5-s 5-G 5-P 7.2 DETERMINE RUST DISTRIBUTION: Determine
Greater than 3 percent the rust distribution (spot, general, or pinpoint) that most
4 to 10 percent 4-s 4-G 4-P closely matches the selected area. Compare the selected
- area with the corresponding color photograph or black and
Greater than 10 percent
3 to 16 percent 3-s 3-G 3-P white image. Determine the percentage of rust on the
Greater than 16 percent surface by visual comparison with the reference photo-
2 to 33 percent 2-S 2-G 2-P graphs, by electronic scanning techniques, or other meth-
Greater than 33 percent ods agreed upon by the contracting parties.
1 Ito 50 Dercent II-Sl I-G I I-P II
7.3 DETERMINE RUST GRADE: The rust grade is
O Greater than 50 percent to€ determined by the percentage of visible rust on the surface
as defined in Table 1. If rust buildup is evident under the
coating, as in a rust blister or as rust undercutting, then that
rusted area shall be included in the determination of the rust
5.2 GENERAL RUSTING: General rusting occurs when grade.
various size rust spots are randomly distributed across the
surface. The reference photographs depicting this type of 7.3.1 A rust blister is defined as a spot on a painted
rusting are labeled 9-G through 1-G. (See Note 9.4.) surface where the coating is intact but raised from the
surface by the expansion of rust. The rust is not visible, but
5.3 PINPOINT RUSTING: Pinpoint rusting occurs when lies beneath the coating. A rust blister is not the same as a
the rust is distributed across the surface as very small fluid-filled blister, which is typically caused by osmotic pres-
individual specks of rust. The reference photographs depict- sure or solvent entrapment. The volume of rust (if present)
ing this type of rusting are labeled 9-P through 1-P. (See in a fluid-filled blister is a small percentage of the volume of
Note 9.4.) the blister, whereas rust occupies most of the volume of a
rust blister. A fluid-filled blister may collapse, but a rust
5.4 OTHER RUSTING: An actual rusting surface may blister will not collapse. (See Notes 9.6 and 9.7) Fluid-filled
be a hybrid combination of the types of rust distribution blisters should not be included in the determination of the
depicted in the reference photographs. In this case, combi- rust grade.
nations of the photographs and rust grades may be needed
to classify the surface. 7.3.2 If rust blisters are present, the rust grade shall be
determined considering the rust blisters as visible rust. This
6. Conditions Depicted rating must be recorded in such a manner that it is clear to
the contracting parties that rust blisters were present and
6.1 The standard contains 27 color photographs of that they were considered as visible rust when assigning a
painted surfaces and the corresponding black and white rust rust grade.
images illustrating the maximum percentage of rusting al-
lowed for each rust grade from rust grade 9 to rust grade l 7.3.3 Rust undercutting at a damaged area, at a broken
blister, or at a place where the painted surface meets a

38
COPYRIGHT The Society for Protective Coatings
Licensed by Information Handling Services
 SSPC-Guide to VIS 2
June 1. 2000

rusted area, shall be considered as visible rust in the rusting have the greatest effect on lowering the rust grade.
determination of the rust grade. A dull putty knife may be The graph of rust grade versus log (percent rust) is a
used to remove loose coating, thereby exposing the rusted straight line from rust grade 1O to rust grade 4. The slope of
areas. the curve was changed between 10 percent of the area
rusted to 100 percent rusted to permit inclusion of complete
7.4 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Care must be exer- rusting on the O to 10 rust grade scale. The relationship
cised when determining the percentage of rust on the between the rust grade, R, and the maximum percent of
surface. rusting, P, is approximated closely by the equations:

7.4.1 Some finishes are stained by rust. This staining R = 6 - 2 Log (P) for rusting from 0.01% to 10%
shall not be considered as rust. (rust grades 10 to 4), and
R = 8 - 4 Log (P) for rusting from 10% to 100%
(rust grades 4 to O).
7.4.2 Accumulated dirt or other material may make
accurate determination of the degree of rusting difficult. This
dirt shall not be considered as rust. Rust Grade versus Log (percent rusting)
R
7.4.3 Certain types of dirt that contain iron or iron
compounds may cause surface discoloration that should not
be mistaken for corrosion.

7.4.5 In evaluating surfaces, consideration shall be

given to the color of the finish coating. A light surface that
contrasts with the rust may appear to have a lower rust
grade than a similarly rusted surface with a color that blends
with the rust.

7.5 REPORTING: Report the area or item evaluated,

the type or types of rust distribution, the presence of rust
blisters (if applicable), and the rust grade.
2.0 .1.5 .1.0 .0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Z.OLKJ(P)
Log (percent rusting)
8. Disclaimer
0.01% 0.03% 0.1% 0.3% 1% 3% 10% 16 33 50 100% P
Percent rusting
While every precaution is taken to ensure that all infor-
mation furnished in SSPC standards and specifications is as
9.3 Table 2 compares the rust grades defined by I S 0
accurate, complete, and useful as possible, SSPC cannot
4628-3 with the European rust scale and with the rust
assume responsibility nor incur any obligation resulting from
grades defined by this standard.
the use of any materials, coatings, or methods specified
herein, or of the specification or standard itself.
Table 2
9. Notes Approximate Correlation Among SSPC/ASTM, ISO, and
European Rust Grade Scales
Notes are not a requirement of this standard. SSPC-VIS PIASTM D 61O ISO*
European Rust
Area Rusted, I Rust Area Rusted, I Rust Grade**
9.1 The rust grade scale is designed for use in distin- % I Grade I % GradeI I
guishing relatively large changes in the percentage of rust <0.01 I 10 I O I Ri0 I Re O
on the surface. For example, this standard is not intended to 0.03to 0.1
distinguish between 3.5 and 3.6% rust, even if electronic 0.3to 1
scanning equipment is used. For low rust levels, the amount 0.3 to 1 Re 3
of rust must triple before falling to the next rust grade. The 3to 10 4 Ri 4 Re 5
standard photographs and the black and white images aid 33 to 50 1 40150 Ri 5 Re 7
I I
the inspector in distinguishing between adjacent rust grades.
* ISO4628-3
** “European scale of degree of rusting for anticorrosive
9.2 The numerical rust grade is a logarithmic function of paints” published by the Comité Européen des associa-
the percent area of rust so that slight amounts of initial tions de fabricants de peintures et d’éncres d’imprimerie
in 1964.

39
COPYRIGHT The Society for Protective Coatings
Licensed by Information Handling Services
 SSPC- Guide to VIS 2
June 1. 2000

9.4 Spot rusting has been associated with barrier coat- collapsed, it was a fluid filled blister. If liquid flows out and
ings such as epoxy or urethane coatings. General rusting the blisterthen collapses, it wasafluidfilled blister. The hard
has been associated with oil, alkyd, and latex paints. Pin- build-up of rust beneath the paint can usually be felt by
point rusting has been associated with untopcoated zinc- touching the blister, thereby identifying it as a rust blister. If
rich coatings, thin inadequately applied coatings, or as flash these methods are inconclusive, cutting the blister with a
rusting on waterborne primers. knife or carefully scraping it off with a dull putty knife will
make it easy to determine the nature of the blister.
9.5 In addition to this standard, SSPC has visual stan-
dards for blast cleaned steel (SSPC-VIS l ) , for hand and 9.7 Fluid filled blisters should not be considered in
powertool cleaned steel (SSPC-VIS3), and for steel cleaned determining the rust grade. A fluid filled blister may form in
by water jetting (SSPC-VIS 4). a relatively short time and then remain intact for years,
especially in immersion environments. A fluid filled blister
9.6 The nature of a blister can usually be determined may form between coats while the steel substrate is still
visually, by touching it, or by breaking it. If the blister has protected.

40
COPYRIGHT The Society for Protective Coatings
Licensed by Information Handling Services
 SSPC-Guide to VIS 2
June 1. 2000
Sample Black and White Images from SSPC-VIS 2
Rust Grade 8, 0.01% Rusted Rust Grade 5, 3% Rusted

Spot Distribution

* *

am
. ‘ r
. b

...

f. t

General Distribution

Pinpoint Distribution
41
COPYRIGHT The Society for Protective Coatings
Licensed by Information Handling Services