Lecture 2 Maintenance Organization
Lecture 2 Maintenance Organization
• Organization means a group of people who work together in a structured way for
a shared purpose. In any industry, the various maintenance functions are planned
and executed by workmen of different trades/disciplines/skills and of different
levels (workmen/employees, supervisors, Executives, engineers, etc.) and they
have to be arranged/grouped/organized in such a way that they have to work as a
team towards a common goal of improving maintenance effectiveness/efficiency
and for improving equipment availability and reliability.
• Such grouping and arranging of maintenance personnel, with their interlinking
and relationships, is generally termed as maintenance organization.
• Maintenance organization, as in the case of other organizations, requires
delegation of authority and span of control, with necessary feedback and control
system.
MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION
• There are almost infinite numbers of organizational structures in use, but
most are not configured to provide effective utilization of the workforce and
have unbalanced indirect (for example, clerical, administrative, and support)
personnel.
• Maintenance organization ( for that reason, even corporate organization) is
both a science and an art.
• The science of organization lies in the different dimensions (e.g. different
categories of workmen, supervisors, staff and support personnel etc) on
which they are designed.
• How organizational dimensions are coordinated, interlinked, and governed is
more art than science. In no two companies are dimensions combined or
managed in the same way. Simply stated, there is neither a clear guideline
nor a single, ideal organization structure that is best for all plants or
corporations.
MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION
• In 1986, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, USA, examined the
balance between current levels of manufacturing technology and of
company’s organization and the conclusion of this study was that American
industry, in its drive to become more competitive, was attempting to put
fifth-generation technology into second-generation plant organizations.
The study also concluded that all maintenance organization should also
correspond to the advancement of maintenance practices in use.
• Employees’ involvement, to a reasonable extent, may also be considered
in deciding maintenance organization through suggestion system,
information sharing, and survey feedback etc. However, while doing this,
care should be taken not to increase the un-necessarily or not to create
additional management structure.
BASIC CONCEPTS FOR MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION
• The following are the basic concepts:
a) Establish reasonably clear division of authority, with minimum overlap – Authority
can be divided functionally, geographically, on the basis of expediency or it can be
on some combination of all the three. But there must always be clear definition of
the line of demarcation to avoid confusion and conflict. The overlap should be bare
minimum.
b) Keep vertical line of authority and responsibility as small as possible – Unclear or
many levels of intermediate supervision or over-application of specialized
functional employees must be minimized. Whenever such practices are felt to be
necessary, clear division of duties must be established.
c) Maintain and optimum number of people reporting to one individual – In a good
organization, number of people reporting to one individual may vary from 3 to 6,
depending on the type of job. When a job requires a fairly small amount of
supervision, one man can direct the activities of 12 or more persons.
d) The total maintenance workload should be reasonably distributed amongst all
concerned persons to avoid conflicts amongst workers.
e) Maintenance is not subordinate to operation. Again, difference between
‘supportive service’ and ‘subordinate service’ should be kept in mind.
FACTORS GOVERNING MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION
• The decisions of maintenance organization vary as per the following local
factors of the organization:
1. Type of operation: e.g. buildings, machine tools, process equipments, electrical
equipments, manufacturing facilities, piping etc – each will affect the character of
organization and supervision required.
2. Continuity of operation: e.g. if the operation is 5/6 days a week, single shift one
or a 7 days a week, round the clock (3 shift) one or others – considerable
differences may be in these on how the maintenance engineering department
may be structured and how many personnel may be needed.
3. Geographical location: The maintenance that may be needed in a compact plant
will vary considerably from the one that is dispersed through several buildings or
over a larger area. The later often leads to area maintenance shops and additional
layers of intermediate supervision as local centres.
4. Equipment’s age and condition: The older the equipment/plant, the more
maintenance and supervision may be needed
5. Size of plant/industry: Here also the actual size of plant/industry and its volume
of business will dictate the number of maintenance employees needed and
amount of supervision for those. Many more subdivisions in both, the line and
staff personnel, can be justified since the overheads can be distributed amongst
more departments.
6. Scope of Plant maintenance engineering department: This scope is a direct
relationship of management policy. Inclusion of responsibilities for a number of
secondary functions means additional manpower and supervision.
7. Employees level of training and reliability: This highly variable factor has a strong
impact on the maintenance organization because it dictates how much work can be
done and how well it can be performed. In industries where sophisticated equipments
predominates, with a high wear or failure incidences, more monitoring systems and
more employees and supervisors may be needed. Higher need of reliability of
equipments may need bigger maintenance organization.
8. Complexity of business and machines and extent of automation and built-in test and
monitoring equipments provided: This may lead to less frequent physical check and
correspondingly less manpower.
9. Prevailing maintenance types/ systems of the industry (for older plants)
10. Extent of out-sourcing or permissible: Availability of highly competent maintenance
contractors around the industry may dictate out-sourcing some maintenance jobs
(intermittent or continuous) and correspondingly reduce the industry’s maintenance
organization
11. Local labour laws and prevailing industrial culture and practices.
AIMS / OBJECTIVES OF MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION
• The basic objective/aim of any maintenance organization or department is to
endure that production plants and equipments are available, at minimum cost,
for production for scheduled hours and quantity, operating to agreed standard,
safely and with minimum waste.
• There must be recognition at the top management level and at all other levels of the
vital need for maintenance organization and an understanding of its aims and
objectives. It should be clear that maintenance department/organization exists only by
virtue of it being necessary for plant’s operation and upkeep. It is not a self sufficient
or self contented unit. It is a part of team that can perform satisfactorily only when
firmly cooperating with others.
• In order to develop an effective maintenance organization, the following
features must be kept in mind:
1. Maintenance is basically a teamwork activity; still the individuals should be able to work
reasonable freedom for the specific/defined job.
2. The jobs/trades/crafts of individuals should be so interlinked that they are supporting to
each other and pulling towards a common goal. This is very essential as maintenance
department consists workers of very many trades/crafts; few of those are given below:
Advantages Disadvantages
• Skill and technology easily disseminated • Collaboration with operation
departments difficult
• Problem easily investigated • Incomplete collection of operating data
• Easy deployment from a more diversified and specialized craft group • Higher transportation cost, both for men
and material
• Lesser duplicating of workers and facilities, thus lesser manpower and • More time getting to and from work
facilities needed area
• Excel in planning, scheduling
• Costly and specialized equipments can be procured and used more
effectively
• More specialized supervision, when needed
• Better standardization and variety reduction of spares and materials for
industry
Generally more cost-effective
iii. PARTIALLY CENTRALIZED
This is the modified version of centralized maintenance organization and suitable for
the industry where units are located at far away locations.
In this type of organization, the maintenance person attached with production unit
will carryout the routine maintenance works.
Scheduled maintenance works such as overhauls, planned maintenance work,
procurement of spare parts are under the control of chief maintenance engineer at
the central office.
Advantages Disadvantages
• Good communication with operating • Difficult to share technology and skills
department
• Skills and technology dissemination and • Management somehow difficult
problem investigation easier
• Many of the other advantages of the • Job rotation requires ingenuity
above two types
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CENTRALIZED
MAINTENANCE GROUPS
1. Planning and scheduling of all major repairs, shutdowns and overhauls, etc., in
consultation with shop maintenance and other agencies
2. Planning of spares, tools, tackles, specific consumables and other necessary materials,
in consultation with shop maintenance, etc.
3. Preparation of annual maintenance budget and periodical reviews
4. Manpower planning and their training and development, in consultation with
personnel department and training department
5. Execution and supervision of all heavy repairs and major overhauls
6. Assistance and technical guidance on addition, modification and replacement (AMR)
schemes of the plant
7. Advise on maintainability and reliability of equipments, before purchase and on
improvement/changes etc
8. Assist shop maintenance personnel in repetitive failure analysis and analysis of other
major defects and suggest suitable improvements/changes.
EXAMPLE OF CENTRALLY CONTROLLED MAINTENANCE
ORGANIZATION
Managing
Director
General
Manager