0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Lesson 7

This document discusses numerical integration and differentiation techniques. It covers the Trapezoidal Rule and Simpson's Rule for numerical integration of functions over an interval. Examples are provided to demonstrate how to use these rules to approximate integrals of specific functions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Lesson 7

This document discusses numerical integration and differentiation techniques. It covers the Trapezoidal Rule and Simpson's Rule for numerical integration of functions over an interval. Examples are provided to demonstrate how to use these rules to approximate integrals of specific functions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

NUMERICAL METHODS AND ANALYSIS

LESSON 7

Presented by: Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr.

z
NUMERICAL
INTEGRATION &
DIFFERENTIATION
TECHNIQUES
Friday, 25 November 2022
z
LEARNING OUTCOMES

At the end of the lesson, the students are expected to


be able to:

▪ evaluate the definite integrals of functions by


Trapezoidal rule and by Simpson’s rule.

▪ obtain numerical approximation to the first and


second derivatives of functions

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
z
NUMERICAL INTEGRATION

▪ the approximate computation of an integral using numerical


techniques

▪ the process of numeric approximation of the definite integral

𝑏
𝐽 = ‫𝑥𝑑 𝑥 𝑓 𝑎׬‬

where J = area under the curve of f between a and b

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
TRAPEZOIDAL RULE

▪ a numerical integration technique in which the general idea is to


split the interval [a, b] into a sequence of N smaller subintervals
𝑏−𝑎
of equal width ℎ =
𝑁

where:
f0 = f(a)
f1 = f(a + h)
f2 = f(a + 2h) = f(b)

න 𝑓 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑠𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑜𝑖𝑑 + 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑜𝑖𝑑


𝑎
1 1 1
= ℎ 𝑓0 + 𝑓1 + ℎ 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 = ℎ 𝑓0 + 2𝑓1 + 𝑓2
2 2 2
z
TRAPEZOIDAL RULE
where:
1
h = (b – a)
3

න 𝑓 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 1𝑠𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑜𝑖𝑑 + 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 2𝑛𝑑 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑜𝑖𝑑


𝑎
+𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 3𝑟𝑑 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑧𝑜𝑖𝑑
1 1 1
= ℎ 𝑓0 + 𝑓1 + ℎ 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + ℎ 𝑓2 + 𝑓3
2 2 2
1
= ℎ [𝑓0 + 2 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + 𝑓3 ]
2

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
z
TRAPEZOIDAL RULE
In general,
𝑏 1
‫𝑓 𝑎׬‬ 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = ℎ 𝑓0 + 2 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + ⋯ + 𝑓𝑁−1 + 𝑓𝑁
2

1
= ℎ[𝑓0 + 2 σ𝑁−1
𝑖=1 𝑓 𝑎 + 𝑖ℎ + 𝑓𝑁 ]
2

𝑏−𝑎
where: ℎ =
𝑁

𝑓0 = 𝑓 𝑎 , 𝑓1 = 𝑓 𝑎 + ℎ , … , 𝑓𝑁 = 𝑓 𝑎 + 𝑁ℎ = 𝑓(𝑏)

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 1
2
Using 4 subintervals, approximate ‫׬‬1 𝑙𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 by trapezoidal rule.
Round-off to 6D. Calculate the error.

SOLUTION:
𝑏−𝑎 2−1
ℎ= = = 0.25
𝑁 4

n xn fn = ln xn
0 1 0
1 1.25 0.223144
2 1.5 0.405465
3 1.75 0.559616
4 2 0.693147
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 1
SOLUTION…

Since

𝑏 1
‫ = 𝑥𝑑 𝑥 𝑓 𝑎׬‬2 ℎ [𝑓0 + 2 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + ⋯ + 𝑓𝑁−1 + 𝑓𝑁 ]
2
1
න 𝑙𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = ℎ 𝑓0 + 2 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + 𝑓3 + 𝑓4
1 2
1
= 0.25 [0 + 2 0.223144 + 0.405465 + 0.559616
2

+0.693147]
2
න 𝑙𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟖𝟑𝟕𝟎𝟎
1
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 1

SOLUTION…

The actual or exact value is


2
න 𝑙𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = xlnx − x|12 = 0.386294
1

Therefore the error is

Error = 0.386294 – 0.383700 = 0.002594 (or about 0.7%)


z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 2

1 𝑥2
Using trapezoidal rule with N = 10, compute ‫׬‬0 𝑒 𝑑𝑥.
Round-off to 6D.

SOLUTION:

𝑏−𝑎 1−0
ℎ= = = 0.1
𝑁 10

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 2
SOLUTION…
𝟐
n 𝒙𝒏 𝒙𝒏 𝟐 fn = 𝒆 𝒙 𝒏
0 0 0 1
1 0.1 0.01 1.010050
2 0.2 0.04 1.040811
3 0.3 0.09 1.094174
4 0.4 0.16 1.173511
5 0.5 0.25 1.284025
6 0.6 0.36 1.433329
7 0.7 0.49 1.632316
8 0.8 0.64 1.896481
9 0.9 0.81 2.247908
10 1 1 2.718282
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 2
SOLUTION…

𝑏 1
‫𝑓 𝑎׬‬ 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = ℎ [𝑓0 + 2 𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + ⋯ + 𝑓𝑁−1 + 𝑓𝑁 ]
2

1 2 1
‫׬‬0 𝑒 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 2 ℎ [𝑓0 + 2(𝑓1 + 𝑓2 + 𝑓3 + 𝑓4 + 𝑓5 + 𝑓6 + 𝑓7 + 𝑓8 + 𝑓9 )

+𝑓10 ]

1
= 0.1 [1 + 2 (1.010050 + 1.040811 + 1.094174
2

+1.173511 + 1.284025 + 1.433329 + 1.632316


+1.896481 + 2.247908) + 2.718282]

1 2
‫׬‬0 𝑒 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 𝟏. 𝟒𝟔𝟕𝟏𝟕𝟓
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
SIMPSON’S RULE
▪ based on passing a quadratic through three equally spaced points,
rather than passing a straight line through two points

To apply Simpson’s Rule,


1. Choose N, which must be an even number of subintervals
2. Calculate
𝑏
1
න 𝑓 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = ℎ[𝑓0 + 4 𝑓1 + 𝑓3 + ⋯ + 𝑓𝑁−1 + 2 𝑓2 + 𝑓4 + ⋯ + 𝑓𝑁−2 + 𝑓𝑁 ]
𝑎 3
Thomas Simpson
1
= ℎ[𝑓0 + 4 σ𝑁−1 𝑁−2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Simpson_(explorer)#/media/File:Thomas_Simpson_(crop).jpg

3 𝑖 𝑜𝑑𝑑 =1 𝑓𝑖 + 2 σ𝑖 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 =2 𝑓𝑖 + 𝑓𝑁 ]

𝑏−𝑎
where: ℎ =
𝑁
𝑓0 = 𝑓 𝑎 , 𝑓1 = 𝑓 𝑎 + ℎ , … , 𝑓𝑁 = 𝑓 𝑎 + 𝑁ℎ = 𝑓(𝑏)
z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 3

2
Using 4 subintervals, approximate ‫׬‬1 𝑙𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 by
Simpson’s rule. Round-off to 6D. Calculate the error.

SOLUTION:
𝑏−𝑎 2−1
ℎ= = = 0.25
𝑁 4

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 3

SOLUTION…

n xn fn = ln xn
0 1 0
1 1.25 0.223144
2 1.5 0.405465
3 1.75 0.559616
4 2 0.693147

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 3
SOLUTION…
𝑏 1
‫= 𝑥𝑑 𝑥 𝑓 𝑎׬‬ 3
ℎ[𝑓0 + 4 𝑓1 + 𝑓3 + ⋯ + 𝑓𝑁−1 + 2(𝑓2 + 𝑓4 +

… + 𝑓𝑁−2 ) + 𝑓𝑁 ]
2 1
‫׬‬1 𝑙𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 3 ℎ 𝑓0 + 4 𝑓1 + 𝑓3 + 2𝑓2 + 𝑓4
1
= 0.25 [0 + 4 0.223144 + 0.559616 + 2 0.405465
3
+0.693147]
2
‫׬‬1 𝑙𝑛𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟖𝟔𝟐𝟔𝟎

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 3

SOLUTION…

Error = 0.386294 − 0.386260

= 0.000034 (or 0.009%)

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 4

2
Using 8 subintervals, approximate ‫׬‬0 cosh 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 by
Simpson’s rule. Round-off to 6D.

SOLUTION:
𝑏−𝑎 2−0
ℎ= = = 0.25
𝑁 8

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 4

SOLUTION…

n xn fn = cosh xn
0 0 1
1 0.25 1.031413
2 0.5 1.127626
3 0.75 1.294683
4 1 1.543081
5 1.25 1.888424
6 1.5 2.352410
7 1.75 2.964188
8 2 3.762196
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 4
SOLUTION…

𝑏 1
‫𝑓 𝑎׬‬ 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = ℎ[𝑓0 + 4 𝑓1 + 𝑓3 + ⋯ + 𝑓𝑁−1 + 2(𝑓2 + 𝑓4 + ⋯ +
3
𝑓𝑁−2 ) + 𝑓𝑁 ]

2 1
‫׬‬0 cosh 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 3 ℎ 𝑓0 + 4 𝑓1 + 𝑓3 + 𝑓5 + 𝑓7 + 2(𝑓2 +𝑓4 + 𝑓6 ) + 𝑓8

1
= 0.25 [1 + 4 (1.031413 + 1.294683 + 1.888424 +
3
2.964188) + 2 (1.127626 + 1.543081 +
2.352410) + 3.762196]

1
= 0.25 [1 + 28.714832 + 10.046234 + 3.762196]
3

2
‫׬‬0 cosh 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 = 𝟑. 𝟔𝟐𝟔𝟗𝟑𝟗
z
NUMERICAL
DIFFERENTIATION
▪ the process of numerically approximating the derivative of a
given function at a given point

▪ there are times in which exact formulas are available but they
are very complicated to the point that an exact computation of
the derivative requires a lot of function evaluations

▪ it might be significantly simpler to approximate the derivative


instead of computing its exact value.

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture
z
FIRST DERIVATIVE
APPROXIMATION
▪ approximates the slope of a
curve f at a particular point x
= x0 in terms of f(x0) and the
value of f at a point where x =
x0 + h

▪ the shorter broken line gives


a decent approximation to the
required slope of the longer
broken line when h is small
enough
z
FIRST DERIVATIVE
APPROXIMATION
𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 ≅ 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒

𝑓 𝑥0 +ℎ −𝑓(𝑥0 )
=
𝑥0 +ℎ−𝑥0


𝑓 𝑥0 + ℎ − 𝑓(𝑥0 )
𝑓 𝑥0 =

This is known as One-sided Forward


Difference approximation to the
derivative of f
z
FIRST DERIVATIVE
APPROXIMATION
Considering a point to the left of x0
𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 ≅ 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒

𝑓 𝑥0 −𝑓 𝑥0 −ℎ
=
𝑥0 −(𝑥0 −ℎ)

𝑓 𝑥0 − 𝑓 𝑥0 − ℎ
𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 =

This is known as One-sided


Backward Difference approximation
to the derivative of f
z
FIRST DERIVATIVE
APPROXIMATION
Considering two points on either side of x0

𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 ≅ 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑛 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒

𝑓 𝑥0 +ℎ −𝑓 𝑥0 −ℎ
=
𝑥0 +ℎ−(𝑥0 −ℎ)

𝑓 𝑥0 + ℎ − 𝑓 𝑥0 − ℎ
𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 =
2ℎ

This is known as Central Difference


approximation to the derivative of f
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5

𝜋
Approximate the derivative of cos x at 𝑥0 = for: (a) h = 0.1, (b) h =
3
0.01, (c) h = 0.001. Use forward difference and central difference
approximations. Round-off to 6D.

SOLUTION:

By forward difference approximation

𝑓 𝑥0 +ℎ −𝑓(𝑥0 )
𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 =

Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5
SOLUTION…

𝜋 𝜋
Since f(x) = cos x, f(x0) = cos x0 = cos , f(x0 + h) = cos (x0 + h) = cos +ℎ
3 3

𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
𝜋 cos 3 +ℎ −cos 3 cos 3 +0.1 −cos 3 0.411044−0.5
(a) 𝑓′ = = =
3 ℎ 0.1 0.1

= −𝟎. 𝟖𝟖𝟗𝟓𝟔𝟎

𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
𝜋 cos 3 +ℎ −cos 3 cos 3 +0.01 −cos 3 0.491315−0.5
(b) 𝑓′ = = =
3 ℎ 0.01 0.01

= −𝟎. 𝟖𝟔𝟖𝟓𝟎𝟎
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5
SOLUTION…

𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
𝜋 cos 3 +ℎ −cos 3 cos 3 +0.001 −cos 3 0.499134−0.5
(c) 𝑓′ = = =
3 ℎ 0.001 0.001

= −𝟎. 𝟖𝟔𝟔𝟎𝟎𝟎

By central difference approximation

𝑓 𝑥0 +ℎ −𝑓 𝑥0 −ℎ
𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 =
2ℎ

𝜋
Here, f(x0 + h) = cos (x0 + h) = cos + ℎ , f(x0 − h) = cos (x0 − h) =
3
𝜋
cos −ℎ
3
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5
SOLUTION…

𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
𝜋 cos 3 +ℎ −cos 3 −ℎ cos 3 +0.1 −cos 3 −0.1
(a) 𝑓′ = =
3 2ℎ 2(0.1)

0.411044 − 0.583960
= = −𝟎. 𝟖𝟔𝟒𝟓𝟖𝟎
0.2

𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
𝜋 cos 3 +ℎ −cos 3 −ℎ cos 3 +0.01 −cos 3 −0.01
(b) 𝑓′ = =
3 2ℎ 2(0.01)

0.491315 − 0.508635
= = −𝟎. 𝟖𝟔𝟔𝟎𝟎𝟎
0.02
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 5

SOLUTION…

𝜋 𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
𝜋 cos +ℎ −cos −ℎ cos +0.001 −cos −0.001
(c) 𝑓′ = 3 3
= 3 3
3 2ℎ 2(0.001)

0.499134 − 0.500866
= = −𝟎. 𝟖𝟔𝟔𝟎𝟎𝟎
0.002
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 6
The distance x of a runner from a fixed point is measured in meters
at intervals of half a second. The Table shows the data obtained.

t (s) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2


x (m) 0 3.65 6.80 9.90 12.15

Use central difference approximation to predict the runner’s velocity


at time t = 0.5 s and t = 1.25 s.

SOLUTION:

𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑥
Velocity is given by the formula 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 = or 𝑥 ′ 𝑡 =
𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑡
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 6

SOLUTION…

Using central difference approximation at t = 0.5 s:

𝑥 𝑡0 +ℎ −𝑥 𝑡0 −ℎ 𝑥 1.0 −𝑥(0) 6.8−0


𝑥 ′ 0.5 = = = = 𝟔. 𝟖 𝐦/𝐬
2ℎ 2(0.5) 1

At t = 1.25 s:

𝑥 1.5 −𝑥(1) 9.9−6.8


𝑥 ′ 1.25 = = = 𝟔. 𝟐 𝐦/𝐬
2(0.25) 0.5
z
SECOND DERIVATIVE
APPROXIMATION
ℎ ℎ
Using the central difference formula for 𝑓 ′ (𝑥0 + ) and 𝑓 ′ (𝑥0 − ), and
2 2

applying central difference approximation for the derivative of 𝑓 ′ at 𝑥0 , we


get the second derivative approximation of the second derivative of f:
ℎ ℎ
𝑓′ 𝑥0 + −𝑓′ (𝑥0 − )
𝑓 ′′ 𝑥0 = 2 2

but

ℎ 𝑓 𝑥0 +ℎ −𝑓(𝑥0 ) ℎ 𝑓 𝑥0 −𝑓(𝑥0 −ℎ)


𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 + = , 𝑓 ′ 𝑥0 − =
2 ℎ 2 ℎ
z
SECOND DERIVATIVE
APPROXIMATION

𝑓 𝑥0 + ℎ − 𝑓(𝑥0 ) 𝑓 𝑥0 − 𝑓(𝑥0 − ℎ)

𝑓 ′′ 𝑥0 = ℎ ℎ

𝑓 𝑥0 +ℎ −𝑓 𝑥0 −𝑓 𝑥0 +𝑓(𝑥0 −ℎ)

=

𝑓 𝑥0 + ℎ − 2 𝑓 𝑥0 + 𝑓(𝑥0 − ℎ)
𝑓 ′′ 𝑥0 =
ℎ2
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 7
The distance x of a runner from a fixed point is measured in meters
at intervals of half a second. The Table shows the data obtained.

t (s) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2


x (m) 0 3.65 6.80 9.90 12.15

Use central difference to approximate the runner’s acceleration at


time t = 1.5 s.

SOLUTION:

Using second derivative approximation

𝑥 𝑡0 +ℎ −2 𝑥 𝑡0 +𝑥(𝑡0 −ℎ)
𝑥 ′′ 𝑡0 =
ℎ2
Presented by Engr. Romulo C. Cruz, Jr. Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering & Architecture

z
EXAMPLE PROBLEM 7
SOLUTION…

where h= 0.5, 𝑡0 = 1.5, 𝑡0 + ℎ = 2, 𝑡0 − ℎ = 1:

12.15−2 9.9 +6.8


𝑥 ′′ 1.5 = = −𝟑. 𝟒 𝐦Τ𝐬𝟐 (runner is slowing down)
(0.5)2

If the runner’s speed is required at 𝑡0 = 1.5, then

𝑥 𝑡0 +ℎ −𝑥 𝑡0 −ℎ
𝑥 ′ 𝑡0 =
2ℎ

12.15−6.8
𝑥 ′ 1.5 = = 5.35 𝑚Τ
𝑠
2(0.5)
z

THANK YOU
FOR LISTENING!

You might also like