Vol2 - Part 13 - Structures Interfaces - Cs - V2a
Vol2 - Part 13 - Structures Interfaces - Cs - V2a
Part 13
Structures Interfaces
STRUCTURES INTERFACES PART
13
Disclaimer
The State of Qatar Ministry of Transport and Communications (MOTC) provides access to the Qatar
Highway Design Manual (QHDM) and Qatar Traffic Control Manual (QTCM) on the web and as hard copies
as Version (2.0) of these manuals, without any minimum liability to MOTC.
Under no circumstances does MOTC warrant or certify the information to be free of errors or deficiencies
of any kind.
The use of these manuals for any work does not relieve the user from exercising due diligence and sound
engineering practice, nor does it entitle the user to claim or receive any kind of compensation for damages
or loss that might be attributed to such use.
Any future changes and amendments will be made available on the MOTC web site. Users of these manuals
should check that they have the most current version.
Note: New findings, technologies, and topics related to transportation planning, design, operation, and
maintenance will be used by MOTC to update these manuals. Users are encouraged to provide feedback
through the MOTC website within a year of publishing these manuals, which will be reviewed, assessed,
and possibly included in the next version.
Contents Page
1 Introduction......................................................................................................................1
4 Maintenance Requirements........................................................................................ 16
4.1. Bridge Structures...................................................................................................................................... 16
4.1.1. Bearings....................................................................................................................................17
4.1.2. Expansion Joints....................................................................................................................17
4.1.3. Access to Edges and Overhangs.....................................................................................18
4.1.4. Access at Bridge Abutments.............................................................................................18
4.1.5. Access within Bridge Decks..............................................................................................18
4.1.6. Drainage of Bridge Decks...................................................................................................19
4.2. Tunnels, Underpass Structures, and Retaining Walls................................................................. 19
4.2.1. Drainage of Tunnels and Underpass Structures.......................................................19
4.2.2. Associated Drainage Structures......................................................................................20
4.2.3. Fire Life Safety Equipment................................................................................................20
5 Pedestrian Crossings................................................................................................... 21
5.1. Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridges........................................................................................................... 21
5.2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Underpasses................................................................................................ 21
6 Animal Crossings.......................................................................................................... 23
References............................................................................................................................... 25
Table
Figure
Appendixes
m meter(s)
m2 square meter(s)
mm millimeter(s)
1 Introduction
Most highway projects employ structures to carry the highway over obstacles, support
the highway, or create space to allow the project to fit harmoniously and safely into the
built environment. Structures may take the form of bridges or underpass tunnels that cross
obstacles or promote traffic movements. Retaining walls, culverts, or sign gantries may also
be required for the safe operation of a highway.
The integration of structures into the highway environment requires that designers consider
the life cycle of the highway and the structure. Particular consideration is to be given to the
safety of operatives and the public during construction, operation, maintenance, and final
demolition. Other essential factors to consider are the overall experience of the users and
the cost-benefit balance for the Overseeing Organization. The designer should consider the
possibility of future modifications to the structure or change of use and, where practical,
incorporate them into the initial design.
The design of highway projects that incorporate structural elements shall include structural
bridge or tunnel engineers working as part of the design team. The structural engineers
should be included in the early design stages to support the development of an efficient and
cost-effective integration of the highway with the structures. This Part identifies criteria for
the integration of highway structures into a highway project. It refers to a separate document
for the details of structures design. It also refers to other Parts of the Qatar Highway Design
Manual where appropriate.
For structures within the RPZ designers shall consult Qatar Rail to establish particular
requirements and design parameters for bridges crossing the Rail Corridor. Also refer to
Qatar Rail guidelines.
• The Overseeing Organization for public works projects is the Qatar Public Works
Authority (Ashghal).
• The approach for non-Eurocode design is generally to be followed unless the basis
for design identified in QHSDM is taken as the Eurocodes and for Eurocode approach -
reference to CG 300 Technical Approval of Highway Structures shall be made.
• The technical approval category of highway structures is provided in Section 2.3 in this
Part.
• The consultant shall confirm the check category of structures with the Overseeing
Organization, particularly those requiring a design check through an independent design
consultant.
• Construction design and management (CDM) regulations and the role of the CDM
Coordinator are to be applied in accordance with Section 11 of the Qatar National
Construction Standards 2014 (Ministry of Environment, 2015).
• Reference to the Commission for Architecture in the Built Environment does not apply.
The Overseeing Organization may specify that the designer is to conduct architectural
studies or appoint a bridge architect or urban realm consultant to assist with bridge
aesthetics.
• Structural design checks shall comply with the IAN009 requirements and QCS 2014 or
the latest available standard shall be adopted for the design.
Table 2.1 identifies the technical approval categories for structures. A designer who is unsure
about the appropriate category for a structure should contact the Overseeing Organization.
• When preparing the AIP document, designers shall consult with the Ashghal Roads
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Department, and any agreed amendments shall be
incorporated into the final version of the AIP before submitting to Ashghal’s Technical
Approval Authority for acceptance.
• Where Departures from Standard (Departures) are proposed or input from the Overseeing
Organization is required on complex structures, the designer may submit an interim AIP.
• A complete AIP for each structure is to be submitted for agreement during the preliminary
design. Designers should not proceed with detailed design until the AIP is agreed to.
• The designer and checking engineers shall submit copies of certificates to the Overseeing
Organization to declare the satisfactory completion of the design and check works with
due professional skills and diligence.
• The design, all relevant calculations reports and check certificates shall refer to the
relevant AIP and any addendums or Departures.
• Sample forms of certificate are provided in Appendix B. If the certificate consists of more
than one page, each page shall be identifiable by the name of the project, the name and
reference number of the structure, and the date of preparation. The form of certificate
may vary depending on the particular requirements of the Overseeing Organization.
Table 2.1 Technical Approval Categories
Notes:
CCTV = closed-circuit television
m = meter(s)
m2 = square meter(s)
Departures identified in it. Agreement of Departures from Standard can be recorded only
through the process identified in Volume 3, Part 25, Departures from Standard Process, of
this Manual.
A complete justification for proposed Departures from Standard shall be submitted to the
Overseeing Organization at an early stage in design. The justification shall include an
assessment of risk level with and without the Departure, and demonstrate that the risk level
of the proposed solution is as low as reasonably practicable. The justification should include
a cost-benefit analysis.
All Departures from Standard shall be agreed before incorporation into the design and before
construction begins. An application for a Departure shall be made for each occurrence, and
Departure agreed between similar situations should not be assumed.
Headroom to structures on a high-load route shall have a posted clearance between 5.5 m
and 6.5 m. Headroom on other routes shall have a posted clearance of 5.5 m, unless agreed
otherwise with the Overseeing Organization. Designers shall confirm with the Overseeing
Organization whether the highway structure crosses over a high-load route.
Utility structures crossing above highways (such as pipe galleries) shall have the same
vertical clearance as pedestrian footbridges, unless directed otherwise by the utility provider.
Over-height protection systems shall be specified for structures with headroom less than
6.5 m. These systems shall be designed in accordance with the IAN 009 .
Changes in highway alignment made to tie in with the adjustments in the cross section over-
bridges shall be carried out in accordance with Volume 1, Part 3, Roadway Design Elements,
of this Manual.
Any amendment to the highway configuration shall take into account measures required for
the safe maintenance and inspection of the bridge.
If sidewalks are not continued over bridges, safe alternative routes shall be provided and
measures taken to discourage pedestrian traffic over the bridge.
On long bridge structures with horizontal grades, the highway designer should consider
using an appropriate vertical crest curve to avoid the illusion of sag. Vertical alignment of
Where bridge structures cross an obstruction at a skew angle, consideration should be given
to reducing the angle of the skew as far as is practical.
If the bridge spans an area where access for under-bridge inspection is difficult, such as
access restrictions associated with a railway, then consideration should be given to increasing
the bridge spans to provide access on either side of the restricted area to aid bridge soffit
inspection.
Changes in highway alignment made to tie in with the adjustments in the cross section
through tunnels or underpasses shall be carried out in accordance with Volume 1, Part 3,
Roadway Design Elements, of this Manual.
Any amendment to the highway configuration shall take into account measures required for
the safe maintenance and inspection of the underpass or tunnel.
If sidewalks are not continued through tunnels or underpasses, safe alternative routes shall
be provided and measures taken to discourage pedestrian traffic through the tunnel or
underpass.
The design of fire and life safety measures is to be dictated by the tunnel designer based on
a risk assessment approach to the safety concerns associated with the tunnel environment.
The tunnel design engineer is directed to the Road Tunnel Fire and Life Safety Systems
(IAN020), in accordance with the Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges and Other Limited
Access Highways (National Fire Protection Association, 2014).
Designers shall specify the clearance to obstacles and protection measures on the drawings
and in the AIPs.
3.6 Parapets
The performance of bridge parapets shall be in accordance with Volume 1, Part 23, Design
and Operations of Road Safety, of this Manual. Safety-fence end treatments shall be avoided
on bridge structures. Designers shall specify the safe working widths of barrier systems
adjacent to structures on the drawings and in the AIPs. When specifying the working width
for bridge parapets, designers should take into account the behavior of the vehicle and debris
on the environment around and under the bridge in the event of a crash.
Deck edges shall be provided with a minimum 100-millimeter (mm) vertical upstand to
prevent debris from falling from the bridge deck, except where an alternative arrangement
has been agreed by the Overseeing Organization.
The designer should take into account the ease of maintaining or replacing damaged parapets
during the design or specification of the bridge parapet.
Masonry vehicle parapets shall not be used on road bridges and structures over or adjacent
to roads, except where their use has been agreed by the Overseeing Organization.
The designer should consider the aesthetic effects of the vehicle parapet construction,
including its connection and finishing details, at the initial stage of the design of the
structure. The aesthetic considerations should complement the aesthetic treatment of other
nearby highway elements.
The requirements of pedestrians and other users need to be considered, particularly sidewalk
widths and vehicle restraint systems in the event of a vehicle crash.
Mesh infilling shall be provided to discourage climbing where pedestrians have access to
open vehicle-deck edge parapets on bridges. The parapet detail shall not provide footholds.
Any Departure from the criteria requires prior agreement by the Overseeing Organization.
Designers shall consult with the rail authority to establish particular requirements for bridge
parapets over railways. Where open parapets are permitted by the rail authority, mesh
infilling shall be provided to prevent climbing of the barrier. Unless permitted otherwise by
the rail authority or the Overseeing Organization, the height of the barrier shall not be less
than 1.5 m. In addition, measures shall be taken to eliminate footholds on the outer (no
traffic) face and prevent access to the outer edge. Any outstands on the outer face shall not
be greater than 15 mm unless agreed otherwise by the rail authority and the Overseeing
Organization. Access restriction can be achieved through solid or mesh sheeting, or through
profiling in the case of concrete barriers.
Refer to Volume 3, Part 23, Design and Operations of Road Safety, of this Manual regarding
performance requirements for impact severity levels. Departures from these performance
criteria require prior agreement by the Overseeing Organization.
The designer should include measures for draining subsurface water from the pavement
layers.
Road signs and gantries on or within structures shall be provided in accordance with Volume 3,
Part 17, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and Volume 3, Part 18, Street Lighting, of this
Manual.
When locating post supports, electrical equipment, feeder pillars, and other mechanical
and electrical equipment, designers shall make provision for their safe inspection and
maintenance. The designer shall identify in the AIP the measures required for maintenance
of the lighting, equipment, and signs, and include any requirements (such as lane closures or
operating procedures) on the design drawings.
Where signs or lighting are provided on columns or gantries, designers shall arrange the
means of support so as to protect it from errant vehicles. Where this requirement is achieved
by providing corbels on the bridge parapet stringcourse of decks, designers should consider
the aesthetic integration of the corbels into the overall bridge appearance.
The use of passive safe posts for lighting or signage in situations where the barrier working
width exceeds the distance to the post should be avoided.
Passive safe posts require the prior agreement by the Overseeing Organization, and should
not be used where a risk exists that the post may fall onto trafficked areas if struck.
Where their use is agreed, passive safe posts are to be designed in accordance with BS EN
12767:2019 and Volume 3, Part 23, Design and Operations of Road Safety, of this Manual.
Designers should make provisions for adequate space for electrical cabinets, feeder pillars,
and other mechanical and electrical equipment, as well as space for them to be safely
maintained. The designer should consider providing spare cable ducts, particularly when the
ducts are cast into concrete surrounds.
4 Maintenance Requirements
The type of structure and the materials used can significantly affect the maintenance liability
of the structural form. The designer should consult with the Ashghal Road Operations and
Maintenance Management Department at key stages of the design development, particularly
at the concept development stage when maintenance requirements can be readily
incorporated into the design. In addition, the designer should consider the requirements of
the Qatar Roads Maintenance Manual (Ashghal, in preparation) for particular maintenance
requirements.
Highway structures shall be designed with due consideration for the safe inspection and
maintenance of the structure.
Good detailing practices shall be adopted during design to minimize the maintenance
liability during the service life of the structures. Unless specified otherwise in this manual,
structures shall be detailed in accordance with the IAN009, which refers to the following
detailing guides:
The design life of structural components shall be taken from the QHSDM.
Intelligent transportation systems may be required to supplement the safe operation and
maintenance of the highway environment, including structures. In such instances the
designer is directed to the current edition of Intelligent Transportation Systems Standards
and Specifications (Ashghal, in preparation) for detailing and inclusion of equipment.
Where specific measures for inspection and maintenance are identified, such as the use
of under-bridge inspection vehicles, the designer shall provide for these measures in the
design of the structure so that they can be safely deployed during operation.
The following measures are specific maintenance items identified for the design and detailing
of bridge structures. Where these measures are not adopted, the reason for the Departure
from this manual shall be described in the AIP and agreed by the Overseeing Organization
before implementation. Where alternative approaches to maintenance are required, these
shall be described in the AIP and documented on the design drawings.
Where structures interact with rail structures the designer shall ensure a design life of 120
years.
4.1.1 Bearings
Where practical, bridges should be designed with integral connections between the
substructure and the superstructure to minimize the requirements for bearing replacement.
Piers and abutments with bearings shall have provision for the safe replacement of the
bearings by using the permanent works. Where it is not possible to use the permanent works
for bearing replacement, designers shall submit the proposals for bearing replacement in the
AIP for review and agreement by the Overseeing Organization.
Bearing replacement operations shall be carried out with no more than a 50 percent
reduction in the number of marked lanes. This requirement shall apply to bridge decks and to
roads under the bridge. Shoulders or untrafficked areas may be used to maintain this traffic
capacity, but this requirement shall be included in the design of the bridge and indicated in
the AIP and on the design drawings.
Jacking points and jack loads shall be identified on the design drawings. Unless advised
otherwise by the Overseeing Organization, sufficient space shall be provided on top of
bridge supports (i.e. at abutments and piers) and on the soffit of bridge superstructures to
place jacks during bearing replacement.
All bearings shall be replaceable and replacement methods shall permit the controlled removal
and replacement of bearings without damaging the bearing or the permanent bridge works.
Where applicable, measures that facilitate bearing removal should be incorporated, such as
the use of bearing adaptor plates on mechanical bearings; for service life of bearings refer to
clause 3.1.3-3 of IAN006/14.
All limited design life components of a joint shall be designed so that they can be easily
replaced, with minimum delay to road users.
Cover plates shall be provided on the curb lines to protect expansion joints. Other measures
should be considered to prevent the accumulation of debris in the joint.
The use of half joints in bridge decks should be avoided. Where half joints are necessary,
the designer shall seek confirmation from the Overseeing Organization that their use is
acceptable and shall incorporate measures within the design for their safe inspection and
maintenance.
To prevent rainwater from edges to run along concrete surface, provide drip mold/groove
near soffit edges.
Bearings and expansion joints in abutments shall be accessible through an inspection gallery.
The access door shall be lockable and should be located on the front face. Where side or top
access is more convenient for maintenance, a reason for this location shall be provided in
the AIP for review and agreement by the Overseeing Organization. Where appropriate, the
designer should consider providing a permanent means of access to the bridge abutment
access door.
The inspection gallery shall have a minimum 600-mm-wide clear walkway. Where possible,
the minimum clear height inside abutment gallery should be 1800 mm, and the abutment
bearing seat should be elevated by 600 mm minimum from the abutment gallery floor to
facilitate inspections of the bearings from within the abutment gallery.
Where significant internal safety concerns exist, the designer should consider the provision
of gallery lighting as appropriate. The gallery should incorporate drainage weep holes to
drain internal moisture buildup, and drip features to prevent tracking of water leaking from
the expansion joint. Ventilation openings to the gallery shall be covered with anti-vermin
screens, with a maximum grid of 12 mm by 12 mm.
positioning of the openings in the bridge decks shall be such that they can be safely
accessed. Where such access requires a lane closure, the AIP shall describe the procedures
for achieving the lane closure and identify the residual road capacity while the closure is in
place.
The following bridge detailing should be considered in addition to those presented in the
IAN009:
Where drainage is provided on bridge decks, the design shall make provision for safe access for
inspection and maintenance of the drainage system. Where permitted in Volume 2, Part 10,
Drainage, of this Manual, direct discharge scuppers or simple traps with easy access should
be used to minimize cleaning and maintenance requirements. When the bridge crosses the
Rail Corridor, no direct water discharge is allowed. Alternative designs for water drainage of
the bridge deck should be performed in such a case of Rail crossing.
External surface-mounted drainage pipes should be avoided. The designer should also avoid
casting lengths of pipe into a significant length of concrete structure. Where cast-in pipes
are required, these shall comprise a single length of pipe without joints.
When the bridge crosses the Rail Corridor, no direct water discharge is allowed. Alternative
designs for water drainage of the bridge deck should be performed in such a case of Rail
crossing.
designer shall include provisions for the removal and replacement of equipment. Access
doors to sumps or pump rooms shall be lockable to prevent unauthorized access.
The designer shall identify the drainage provisions based on requirements given in Volume 2,
Part 10, Drainage, of this Manual and should modify the highway cross section to incorporate
any particular requirements.
5 Pedestrian Crossings
The design of pedestrian or cycle bridges shall be subject to technical approval in accordance
with Chapter 2 in this Part.
Surface water shall be positively drained from the bridge deck, ramps, and stairs, in compliance
with the IAN009.
The requirements for measures such as air conditioning, property privacy screens, and lift
access are location-sensitive and shall be established with the Overseeing Organization.
Designers shall establish with the Overseeing Organization whether a bridge requires full
enclosure.
Underpass lighting shall be provided in accordance with Volume 3, Part 18, Street Lighting,
of this Manual. Where the highway has an overall median greater than 2 m, the top slab may
include openings for natural light and ventilation.
Underpasses shall be positively drained to sumps in accordance with Volume 2, Part 10,
Drainage, of this Manual. Where pump rooms are required, these too shall comply with
Volume 2, Part 10, Drainage, of this Manual.
Where there is a high possibility that windblown sand will enter the underpass and affect its
operability, designers should provide methods for preventing the accumulation of sand and
measures to facilitate the cleaning and removal of the sand.
6 Animal Crossings
Where possible, pedestrian underpasses are to be dual function so they can accommodate
pedestrian and animal traffic. For underpasses that accommodate animals, pedestrians,
or cyclists, with no vehicular access, the minimum headroom shall be 3.7 m, except where
suitable facilities are provided to allow riders to dismount and remount then the headroom
can be reduced to 2.7 m. The headroom for camel underpasses is given in Volume 1, Part 3,
Roadway Design Elements, of this Manual. The distinction between animal and camel
crossings depends on the primary use and shall be defined by the Overseeing Organization.
The minimum width for an animal crossing without pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicular access
shall be 3.0 m.
If animal crossings are to be combined with vehicular access under a highway, then the
minimum headroom clearances identified in Volume 1, Part 3, Roadway Design Elements, of
this Manual shall be maintained. The cross section requirements shall also be maintained,
although the minimum width shall be 10 m.
Wingwalls or retaining walls at the entrance and exit of an animal crossing shall have a
45-degree splay or greater. The gradient of the ground leading into the entrance and exit
shall be no greater than 1:14.
Where the highway has an overall median greater than 2 m, the top slab may be discontinued
to provide an opening for natural light and ventilation.
The barrier heights on over-bridges used for animal crossings shall be amended as follows:
Consideration should be given to screening and the use of solid barriers on the edge of
bridges to prevent visual and audible distractions to animals.
Where there is a high possibility that windblown sand will enter the underpass and affect its
operability, designers should provide methods for preventing the accumulation of sand and
measures to facilitate removal of the sand.
References
Ashghal. Criteria for Highway Structures. Interim Advice Note009. Rev.No. A2.State of Qatar Public Works
Authority:Doha,Qatar.2016.
Ashghal. Road Tunnel Fire and Life Safety Systems. Interim Advice Note020.Rev.No.A2.State of Qatar
Public Works Authority:Doha,Qatar.2016.
Ashghal. Intelligent Transportation Systems Standards and Specifications. State of Qatar Public Works
Authority: Doha, Qatar. In preparation.
Ashghal. Qatar Highway Structure Design Manual. State of Qatar Public Works Authority: Doha, Qatar. In
preparation.
Ashghal. Qatar Roads Maintenance Manual. State of Qatar Public Works Authority: Doha, Qatar. In
preparation.
BS EN 12767:2019 “Passive Safety of Support Structures for Road Equipment - Requirements, Classification
and Test Methods “British Standards Institution: London, England. August 2019.
The Concrete Society. Durable Post-tensioned Concrete Structures. Technical Report 72. Surrey, England.
2010.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA). Bridge Detailing Guide.
Publication 543. London, England. 2001.
Department for Transport. “CD 143 “ Designing for Walking, Cycling and Horse-riding”. Rev.No.01, January
2020.
Department for Transport. “Loads for Highway Bridges.” Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Volume 1,
Section 3, Part 14. BD 37/01. UK Highways Agency: London, England. http://www.dft.gov.uk/ha/
standards/dmrb/vol1/section3/bd3701.pdf. August 2001.
Department for Transport. “Design Criteria of Footbridges” CD 353 shall be referenced for a Eurocode
approach.
Department for Transport. PD CEN/TR 16949:2016 “Road Restraint Systems. Pedestrian Restraint
System - Pedestrian Parapets” British Standards Institution:London,England.2016.
National Fire Protection Association. Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access
Highways. NFPA 502. Quincy, Massachusetts, United States. 2014.
Appendix A
Approval Principle Form
COVER
Include Project Number, Project Name and Bridge Name.
Include and document control information, forms, and sheets required by the designer’s quality assurance
system.
The document should have a revision number and a record of revision history.
1 HIGHWAY DETAILS
1.1 Type of Highway
Describe all roads, including roads over and under bridges; for example, freeway,
expressway, arterial, collector, local, and high-load route.
1.2 Permitted Traffic Speed
Indicate for all roads, including those over and under bridges.
2 SITE DETAILS
2.1 Obstacles Crossed
List all obstacles; for example roads, rail lines, tracks, watercourses, major and pipelines.
3 PROPOSED STRUCTURE
3.1 Description of Structure
Basic description; for example, four-span road over road bridge.
3.2 Structural Type
Basic description to include proposed basic material and form of construction; for example,
in situ post-tensioned concrete box girder.
3.3 Foundation Type
Basic description to include proposed basic material and form of construction; for example,
in situ reinforced concrete pile cap on bored cast in situ piles.
3.4 Span Arrangements and General Dimensions
List number and dimensions of spans, deck width, skew angle, and other dimensions.
3.5 Articulation Arrangements
Describe articulation arrangements, including location of any fixed, guided, and free
bearings.
Indicate type of any bearings proposed; for example, pot bearing or spherical bearing.
Indicate type of any expansion joints proposed; for example, slip strip or elastomeric.
3.6 Types of Road Restraint Systems
Parapet or barrier shape, material, containment level, height, and other details.
3.7 Maintenance and Inspection
6 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS
6.1 Acceptance of the Geotechnical Report
Give acceptance of recommendations of the geotechnical report to be used in the design
and reasons for any proposed changes.
If the geotechnical report is not yet available, state when the results are expected and
list the sources of information used to justify the preliminary choice of foundations.
When the results of the ground investigation become available, an addendum to the AIP
or a reissue, covering Section 6, shall be submitted to Ashghal. If an addendum is issued,
it shall have its own Sections 8, 9, and 10 to provide a list of drawings, documents, and
signatures.
6.2 Geotechnical Summary
Provide a brief description of the ground conditions and any relevant soil or rock properties
assumed in the design.
6.3 Differential Settlement
Clarify differential settlement to be allowed for in the design of the structure.
7 CHECKING
7.1 Proposed Category
Refer to table 2.1-Technical Approval Categories.
7.2 Name of Proposed Independent Checker
7.3 Erection Proposals or Temporary Works
Erection proposals or temporary works for which an independent check will be required,
listing parts of the structure affected and providing reasons for recommending an
independent check.
8 DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS
8.1 Drawings and Documents
List of documents and drawings (including numbers) appended to the AIP.
Signed
Name
Position Held
Engineering Qualifications
On behalf of (Organization)
Date
Organizations’ Stamp
Name
Position Held
Engineering Qualifications
Acceptance
Date
This acceptance does not relieve the designer/checker or the Category 3 checker of the responsibility for:
1. The validity and arithmetic correctness of the calculations and their translations into the design
details, design drawings, specification clauses, and other documentation.
2. The applicability and accuracy of all computer programs.
3. Verifying the validity to the programs for each application.
Plan
North arrow
Right-of-way
Chainage
Earthworks profile
Plan dimension on roadway(s)/watercourse/railway
Skew angle
Service ducts/chambers
Lighting
Interface with existing or proposed structures
Direction of flow for watercourses
Articulation arrangement
Elevation
Existing ground profile
Rock profile/competent strata
Intermediate and end support details
Foundations (hidden detail)
Access arrangements
Paving details
Slope protection
Lighting
Safety barriers
Interfaces with existing or proposed structures
Clearance envelope
Overall length
Span dimensions
Water levels (flood level assumed)
Road/rail under cross slope, dimensions
Watercourse cross section dimensions
Parapets/pedestrian guardrail
Earthworks profile
Cross Section
Bridge cross section dimensions
Cross slope
Superstructure cross section
Interface with existing structures
Interface with intermediate supports
Raised shoulder/sidewalk details
Services
Parapet/pedestrian guardrail
Surfacing and waterproofing
Miscellaneous
Wingwalls
Approach arrangements
Finishes
Waterproofing details
Indicative location of construction joints
Appendix B
Sample Certificates
(Name of Structure)
that reasonable professional skill and care has been taken by us with a view to securing that the
further divided part of the Design or Design Element:
(a) Complies with the Particular Overseeing Organization’s Requirements;
(b) Has been accurately translated into the execution drawings and bar bending schedules
bearing the unique numbers listed below; and
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
(c) Is not detrimental to the whole Design or Design Element and will not affect the
completion of the Certificate(s).
We agree that the words and phrases herein, unless otherwise stated, have the same meaning as
attributed to them in the Contract between the Overseeing Organization and Consultant.
Signed: .............................…...........….………………………………………
On behalf of the ENGINEER
Signed: .............................…...........….………………………………………
On behalf of the ENGINEER
Signed: .............................…...........….………………………………………
On behalf of the ENGINEER
Signed: .............................…...........….……………………………………
On behalf of the ENGINEER