Cambridge International AS & A Level: Geography 9696/21
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Geography 9696/21
GEOGRAPHY 9696/21
Paper 2 Core Human Geography May/June 2023
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
2. Additional page has been checked 2. All blank pages in the provided generic
answer booklet and/or extension answer
booklet(s).
Section A
Answer all questions in this section. All questions are worth 10 marks.
Population
1(a) Fig. 1.1 shows the age/sex structure for the world in 1980. Fig. 1.2 3
shows the age/sex structure for the world in 2020.
Using Fig. 1.1 and Fig. 1.2, calculate the difference in the percentage of
population 80 years and over between 1980 and 2020. Show your
working.
1(b) Using Fig. 1.1 and Fig. 1.2, compare the shape of the two age/sex 3
structures.
Candidates should offer evidence from Fig. 1.1 to support the comparison.
Max. 1 mark if no direct comparison.
1 mark for a simple reason or 2 marks for a developed reason (with detail
or an example), to the maximum.
Migration
2(a)(i) Table 2.1 shows the top 10 sources of migrants into the USA, an HIC in 1
North America, in 1990 and 2013.
Mexico
Canada
Candidates should offer data from Fig. 2.1 to support the description.
1 mark for a simple point or 2 marks for a developed point with supporting
data from Fig. 1.1, to the maximum.
2(c) Suggest why Mexico is a large source of migrants into the USA. 5
1 mark for a simple point or 2/3 marks for a point with development (with
detail or an example), to the maximum.
Settlement dynamics
3(a)(i) Fig. 3.1 shows the cities with over 1 million population in Nigeria, an 1
MIC in West Africa, in 2021.
3(a)(ii) Using Fig. 3.1, state the number of cities with populations: 1
between 1 and 2 million.
3(b) Using Fig. 3.1, what evidence is there for a hierarchy of cities in 3
Nigeria?
Candidates should offer data from Fig. 3.1 to support the comparison.
There is one large city (Lagos with almost 15 million) then two around
3–4 million and five between 1–2 million. This suggests a hierarchy of
power 2
It is an unbalanced (primate city) hierarchy as the largest city is more
than twice the size of the second city
Accept any that say why there is no evidence for a hierarchy
A world city, also called a power city, global city, alpha city or world centre,
is a city which is a primary node in the global economic network.
Candidates are free to develop their own explanation.
Candidates may focus on general city growth, but this is too limited for
credit. Answers should show some awareness of what a world city is to
achieve a mark.
1 mark for a simple point or 2 marks for a point with development (with
detail or an example), to the maximum.
If purely description, then max. 2 marks.
Section B
Answer one question from this section. All questions are worth 30 marks.
Population
4(b) With the aid of examples, explain how overpopulation can occur. 8
Overpopulation of an area is when there are too many people for the
amount of food, materials, and space available there. Carrying capacity is
exceeded.
The explanation may look at the balance between population and resources:
Increased population due to high natural increase or migration
Increased levels of consumption by the population
Failure in the resource base due to a climatic or geological hazard e.g.
drought
Exhaustion of the resource base e.g. soils become exhausted
Level 3 (6–8)
Response clearly explains how overpopulation can occur. Response is well
founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the
topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated effectively into the
response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response explains how overpopulation can occur. Response develops on a
largely secure base of knowledge and understanding. Examples may lack
detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response is largely descriptive about how overpopulation can occur.
Knowledge is basic and understanding may be inaccurate. Examples are in
name only or lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Candidates are free to develop their own approach to the question and
responses will vary depending on the approach chosen. Whichever
approach is chosen, essays which address the question and support their
argument with relevant examples will be credited. There may be detailed
consideration of a case study/one or more examples, or a broadly conceived
response, drawing on several examples to illustrate the factors involved.
There should be a recognition that this may vary with time, location, type of
environment and the nature of the population. A sound approach would be
to contrast LICs and HICs and acknowledge the inequalities that exist.
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (12–15)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which population will always
grow to exceed food supply. Examples used are appropriate and integrated
effectively into the response. Response is well founded in detailed
knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the topic.
Level 3 (8–11)
Response discusses the extent to which population will always grow to
exceed food supply but may be unbalanced. Examples may lack detail or
development. Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge
and understanding.
Level 2 (4–7)
Response shows general knowledge and understanding of the extent to
which population will always grow to exceed food supply. Response is
mainly descriptive or explanatory with limited use of examples and
understanding of the topic may be partial or inaccurate. Some concluding
remarks. General responses without the use of example(s) will not get
above the middle of Level 2 (6 marks).
Level 1 (1–3)
Response may broadly discuss population issues but does not address the
question and does not come to a convincing conclusion. Response is
descriptive, knowledge is basic and understanding is poor.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Population/Migration
The focus is on characteristics rather than explaining the two terms. Max. 3
marks if no comparison or if description of the flows.
5(b) With the aid of examples, suggest why refugee flows may increase in 8
the future.
This question is about the cause of refugee flows and why such causes may
be more frequent in the future. It is speculation but should be grounded in
current trends such as:
Level 3 (6–8)
Response clearly explains why refugee flows may increase in the future.
Response is well founded in detailed knowledge and strong conceptual
understanding of the topic. Examples used are appropriate and integrated
effectively into the response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response explains why refugee flows may increase in the future. Response
develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and understanding.
Examples may lack detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response is largely descriptive about how refugee flows may increase in
the future. Knowledge is basic and understanding may be inaccurate.
Examples are in name only or lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
5(c) With the aid of examples, assess the extent to which refugee flows 15
impact more on receiving/destination areas in LICs/MICs than on
receiving/destination areas in HICs.
Candidates are free to develop their own approach to the question and
responses will vary depending on the approach chosen. Whichever
approach is chosen, essays which address the question and support their
argument with relevant examples will be credited. There may be detailed
consideration of a case study/one or more examples, or a broadly conceived
response, drawing on several examples to illustrate the factors involved.
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (12–15)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which refugee flows impact
more on receiving/destination areas in LICs/MICs than on
receiving/destination areas in HICs. Examples used are appropriate and
integrated effectively into the response. Response is well founded in
detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the topic.
Level 3 (8–11)
Response discusses the extent to which refugee flows impact more on
receiving/destination areas in LICs/MICs than on receiving/destination areas
in HICs but may be unbalanced. Examples may lack detail or development.
Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge and
understanding.
Level 1 (1–3)
Response may broadly discuss refugee flows but does not address the
question and does not come to a convincing conclusion. Response is
descriptive, knowledge is basic and understanding is poor.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
Settlement dynamics
6(b) With the aid of examples, explain how and why the location of retailing 8
in cities has changed over time.
Why involves the explaining of one or more of these changes. This could
include:
To escape high rents/taxes in the CBD
To better meet the needs of customers
To gain more floor space at a cheaper price
Easier access/parking for customers and suppliers
Government planning restrictions
To gain greater linkage or comparison with other retailers
Max. 3 marks for a generic answer without exemplar content or if one of the
components (how or why) are clearly missing.
Level 3 (6–8)
Response clearly explains how and why the location of retailing in cities has
changed over time. Response is well founded in detailed knowledge and
strong conceptual understanding of the topic. Examples used are
appropriate and integrated effectively into the response.
Level 2 (3–5)
Response explains how and why the location of retailing in cities has
changed over time. Response develops on a largely secure base of
knowledge and understanding. Examples may lack detail or development.
Level 1 (1–2)
Response is largely descriptive about how the location of retailing in cities
has changed over time. Knowledge is basic and understanding may be
inaccurate. Examples are in name only or lacking entirely.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.
6(c) With the aid of examples, how far do you agree that Central Business 15
Districts (CBDs) are in decline?
Candidates are free to develop their own approach to the question and
responses will vary depending on the approach chosen. Whichever
approach is chosen, essays which address the question and support their
argument with relevant examples will be credited. There may be detailed
consideration of a case study/one or more examples, or a broadly conceived
response, drawing on several examples to illustrate the factors involved.
CBDs are in a state of change. Once centres for retailing, commerce and
offices, both the movement out to the suburbs and the online revolution
threaten their central pivotal role in the urban structure and lead to decline in
activity. There is some hope for this central area possibly based around:
Entertainment and recreational functions – could involve re-imaging
As a tourist centre (as still a transport hub plus historical/cultural
aspects)
As high-class residential
Universities/educational establishments
Government functions/offices
Providing personal services e.g. beauty parlours
Large amount of investment in the CBD, so in the interests of investors
and governments to find a use for such a central area
Award marks based on the quality of the response using the marking levels
below.
Level 4 (12–15)
Response thoroughly discusses the extent to which Central Business
Districts (CBDs) are in decline. Examples used are appropriate and
integrated effectively into the response. Response is well founded in
detailed knowledge and strong conceptual understanding of the topic.
Level 3 (8–11)
Response discusses the extent to which Central Business Districts (CBDs)
are in decline but may be unbalanced. Examples may lack detail or
development. Response develops on a largely secure base of knowledge
and understanding.
Level 1 (1–3)
Response may broadly discuss the Central Business District (CBD) but
does not address the question and does not come to a convincing
conclusion. Response is descriptive, knowledge is basic and understanding
is poor.
Level 0 (0)
No creditable response.