Title: The Challenges of Crafting an Active and Passive Euthanasia Thesis Statement

Crafting a thesis statement on the complex topic of active and passive euthanasia can be an arduous
task, requiring a deep understanding of the ethical, moral, and legal aspects surrounding this
controversial subject. Scholars and students alike find themselves grappling with the weighty
responsibility of presenting a clear, concise, and well-supported argument that navigates the
intricacies of euthanasia.

The difficulty arises from the multifaceted nature of the topic, as it involves delving into ethical
considerations, medical perspectives, legal frameworks, and the broader societal implications of end-
of-life decisions. Formulating a thesis statement that not only encapsulates the essence of one's
perspective but also addresses the opposing viewpoints with respect and diligence is a formidable
challenge.

Students often encounter hurdles in researching and synthesizing the vast array of literature available
on the subject. Analyzing the diverse perspectives of philosophers, medical professionals, legal
experts, and ethicists requires a comprehensive understanding of their arguments and the ability to
integrate them seamlessly into the thesis statement.

Furthermore, the emotional and moral dimensions of active and passive euthanasia add another layer
of complexity. Crafting a thesis that not only aligns with personal beliefs but also respects the
diverse perspectives of a global audience demands a delicate balance of empathy and critical
thinking.

To navigate these challenges, individuals seeking assistance in developing a well-structured and

Helpwriting.net provides a team of experienced writers with expertise in various fields, ensuring that
each thesis statement is meticulously crafted to meet academic standards and reflect a nuanced
understanding of the subject. By entrusting their thesis statements to the experts at ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔, individuals can save time, reduce stress, and enhance the quality of their
academic work.

In conclusion, addressing the complexities of active and passive euthanasia in a thesis statement
requires a careful blend of research, empathy, and critical analysis. For those seeking support in
navigating these challenges, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ offers a reliable solution, allowing individuals
to present their arguments with clarity, coherence, and confidence.
Instead of reinforcing this belief, Callahan suggests it should be eliminated. His arguments are that
Jack’s patients are not in that much pain and are just depressed about being handicapped or being
diagnosed as having a terminal illness. However, Rachels prompts readers to consider if they truly
agree with this perspective.I don’t think so.The decision regarding euthanasia becomes purely moral
when considering the Smith and Jones case, emphasizing the delicate balance between human
morality and self-interest.However,this does not apply to medicine. Appeals for non- voluntary and
involuntary euthanasia are also common in cases wherein the cost of keeping the patient alive with
no signs of improvement are very high. Sometimes I had no time to do my homework or the tasks
were too hard for me to complete. To accept this argument we have to agree that the best action is
one the which causes the greatest happiness or perhaps the least unhappiness for the patient and
perhaps for the patient's relatives and carers too. Each person has value and is worthy of respect, has
basic rights and freedom and the power to choose their own destiny. The bench was hearing a PIL
filed in 2005 by the NGO, which said when a medical expert opines that a person afflicted with a
terminal disease has reached a point of no return, he should be given the right to refuse life support.
To examine this issue, Rachels presents two similar cases involving individuals attempting to inherit
money by eliminating their young cousins. In the second case, another man named Jones plans to
drown his cousin but passively watches as the child accidentally falls and drowns. Gandhi
participated in numerous protests, resulting in his arrest on five occasions. The major argument for
euthanasia is that people who are in unbearable pain shouldn't have to suffer. However, they are
likely to argue in favour of allowing euthanasia. The passive variety is accepted in most countries and
considered as a patient right in some. In almost half of these cases, healthcare professionals decided
to stop, limit or withhold treatment, whether or not the patient had explicitly requested it. The law
only establishes a specific legal framework in which medical decisions might be taken, implicitly
prohibiting what is not explicitly allowed. As euthanasia is seen as immoral, and in most countries is
illegal, it is rarely performed. This can be argued that passive euthanasia has exactly the same moral
and practical results as active euthanasia, lethal injection at the patient’s request. The goal of ethics,
or the theory of moral behavior, is to either refrain from causing suffering or to relieve it whenever
possible. Many countries around the globe have addressed the issue of passive euthanasia to
decriminalize it. Again, which form of mercy killing the patient or his family resorts has an important
role to play when it comes to legalities. Some argue that both forms of euthanasia are morally wrong,
as they involve taking a life intentionally. Please include what you were doing when this page came
up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. The moral dilemma between passive
and active euthanasia is evident in the medical world. The only thing that is “wrong” is something
that is intentionally unloving (Ray Elliott 2001). Answer: Fortunately for us, dogs do not understand
they are going to be put down and what happens after they are given the injection that puts them to
sleep. Promoted Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com On January, 15, 2016, the Centre
had said the 241st report of the Law Commission stated that passive euthanasia should be allowed
with certain safeguards and there was also a proposed law --Medical Treatment of Terminally Ill
Patient (Protection of Patients and Medical Practitioners) Bill, 2006. Choosing active euthanasia
goes beyond simply disposing of a body; it involves emotional strain and moral dilemmas. Extreme
could mean when someone has cancer, is not in pain, and will never get better to one person, but to
another person it could mean something completely different. When seeking a solution to a moral
dilemma you take into account the consequences and the potential consequences of this issue of
euthanasia and decide on balance the action that is going to work to the advantage of all concerned.
Rachels argues that there is no significant moral difference between the two methods. While it was
predicted that many would take advantage of the law, of the 23 terminally ill individuals who
applied to end their own lives in 1998, 15 committed suicide, usually within a day of receiving the
prescription. In case of active euthanasia, on the other hand, a lethal substance is used to put the
person to death. In this instance, both the patient and the doctor know that there is no cure for the
condition the patient is suffering from, and soon the patient will succumb to the illness. Do you hate
math, physics, or another other science subject. Christianity states that birth, life and death are all a
part of God's processes and that people should respect them and do not have the right to end it
themselves, as it would offend God. “Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that
God’s Spirit dwells in your midst. In fact, some biographical lives are flat wrong if you want to be
the best male prostitute you can be. Involuntary euthanasia ignores the individual’s autonomous
rights and could potentially bring about death of an unwilling victim. The sea can be very serene in
summer days, and it also can be very dangerous. Hence, it would be incorrect to assert that the doctor
takes no action. Kath Harrigan Right to Life NSW Reproduced with permission. It is not just dying
with dignity, there is more to it. Answer: Fortunately for us, dogs do not understand they are going to
be put down and what happens after they are given the injection that puts them to sleep. This means
that a terminally-ill patient is administered a lethal drug or substance intentionally in order for them
to pass away peacefully, in this case, in the event of terminal illness. Shanbaug had been in a
vegetative state for 36 years, and stopping life-supporting treatment to her would result in her life
ending peacefully, as opposed to her undergoing constant pain since close to three-and-a-half-
decades. Nowadays college and university students find themselves under great pressure. These
guidelines include who will have the power to decide on administering of passive euthanasia on the
patient as well as how the respective medical board would go about taking this decision. However,
both fall under the term 'euthanasia', therefore creating the question; Should euthanasia be legal. The
patient then goes ahead and ingests the lethal drugs at a place and time of his or her own choosing.
Situation Ethics isn't helpful when it comes to legislation, largely because the situation ethicist would
ignore any rules that were made anyway if the situation demanded it. One cannot be moral if they
are being forced to follow a set of instructions to lead a life if good deeds. Even though both groups
oppose this concept, the reasons they cite are different. The term mercy killing originated from the
Grecian word for “good decease. ” It is the act or pattern of stoping the life of a individual either by
deadly injection or the postponement of medical intervention ( Munson. 2012. p. 578 ). Many
position euthanasia as merely conveying alleviation by relieving hurting and agony. He was convicted
of second-degree murder and served eight years of a 1 0-to-25-year prison sentence. But in a post-
mortem carried out by a coroner, called Llibusia Dragowich, it was discovered that out of thirty-nine
patients: Ten were suffering from a terminal disease, twenty-six were in a little pain but death was
not an option and three had nothing wrong with them at all. It requires actions that speed up the
process of dying. What are the chances of coming back from life support. In the first place, it could
happen that somebody said that, if they somehow happened to fall into a changeless
unconsciousness, they would particularly need their body to be kept alive for whatever length of time
that conceivable. Assisted dying only applies to terminally ill, mentally competent adults and requires
the dying patient, after meeting strict legal safeguards, to self administer life-ending medication.
Paterson 2012 argues that killing a person, whether it is for their own good or not, is still immoral.
Voluntary euthanasia OCCUrs when patients with decision making capacity authorize physicians to
take his or her life. Though the potential abuse argument does sound convincing, there are some
questions which are still left unanswered. How do we morally and scientifically justify active
euthanasia with evidence. The final argument relates to public policy; if we make voluntary
euthanasia legal, we will be able to control how it is performed. Many countries around the globe
have addressed the issue of passive euthanasia to decriminalize it. In medicine Utilitarianism plays a
major part in decision making. Over a period of decades, Sovereign developed several controversial
ideas related to death. When it is determined that ending a deteriorating life is the appropriate action,
there should be no hesitation but rather a sense of relief. When a person is in pain, the right thing to
do is to try and help the pain go away. He said the decision whether to remove life support or not,
can only be taken by a medical board after examining the condition of a patient. In the case of
euthanasia, regardless of intent, a person loses their life. He had carried out thorough investigation
into the patient. Mother Nature is just like everyone, beautiful and attractive, with a lot of features
and resources that help us live. People use this as an argument against the legalisation of euthanasia.
Euthanasia is based in Situation Ethics as people turn to Euthanasia to end suffering and allow a
person in pain to be at peace. Do you hate math, physics, or another other science subject. On the
basis of whether the person's consent is available or not, mercy killing is categorized into three forms
or types: voluntary, non- voluntary, and involuntary. Consider using our writing service to ensure
your excellent grades. First of all we guarantee the highest quality of our work. Philosopher Daniel
Callahan contends that suffering arises not only from physical causes but also from individual
values. Smoking not only affects the smoker’s health but also those who are exposed to the smoke it
generates. But in a post-mortem carried out by a coroner, called Llibusia Dragowich, it was
discovered that out of thirty-nine patients: Ten were suffering from a terminal disease, twenty-six
were in a little pain but death was not an option and three had nothing wrong with them at all. This
is merely scratching the whole issue of euthanasia. Christianity states that birth, life and death are all
a part of God's processes and that people should respect them and do not have the right to end it
themselves, as it would offend God. “Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that
God’s Spirit dwells in your midst. James Rachels has offered some other arguments that work
differently. Personal autonomy is the capacity to decide for oneself and pursue a course of action in
one's life, often regardless of any particular moral content. I'm just afraid of what you might have to
go through to get there.”. The existence of survivors with terminal cancer serves as proof that
overcoming such illnesses is achievable. It is against the law of nature to cause intentional death
instead of allowing for nature to play its role. While smokers definitely gain something out of it, non-
smokers are concerned with the risks it poses on human health.
Even though it is illegal, the US law does give patients the right to refuse medication, which
eventually amounts to passive euthanasia. Smoking not only affects the smoker’s health but also
those who are exposed to the smoke it generates. But if the doctor puts the hypodermic needle
beside your bed, explains to you what it is, and leaves, and you later inject yourself, this is
considered assisted suicide. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best.
This is illegal throughout the world except for Australia, which legalised euthanasia in 1994, but this
law has recently been overturned. The argument is that Euthanasia happens and will always be here
with us, and the best thing to do is to set meaningful laws that will control it. The first page of the
PDF of this article appears above. There also exist cases wherein the patient is put to death against
his will in what is referred to as involuntary euthanasia. Probably the most important resource is
water, and water comes from the sea or the rain. To illustrate this point, let’s consider a scenario
involving parents who make the decision to refrain from having a doctor perform a life-saving
surgery for their baby with intestinal issues. Kath Harrigan Right to Life NSW Reproduced with
permission. There do exist medical cases wherein damage to brain leaves the person in a condition
wherein he can feel or think, but cannot speak or move. His arguments are that Jack’s patients are not
in that much pain and are just depressed about being handicapped or being diagnosed as having a
terminal illness. In this instance. Froddo has found a aureate ring during a journey to Modor. This
sample Passive Euthanasia Research Paper is published for educational and informational purposes
only. Assisted dying is legalised and regulated in the US States of Oregon and Washington. Various
types of euthanasia are recognised, with active. For Africans, death and dying form an integral part
of their everyday existence Blendon et al. Involuntary euthanasia ignores the individual’s
autonomous rights and could potentially bring about death of an unwilling victim. In involuntary
active euthanasia, one person decides that another person's life is no longer worth living or no longer
of value, and has him killed. In 1991, however, the State of Michigan revoked Asseveration’s
medical license and made it clear that given his actions, he was no longer permitted to practice
educing or to work with patients. Philosopher Daniel Callahan contends that suffering arises not only
from physical causes but also from individual values. It was 1806, when Dr. Cristoph Hufeland,
wrote that, “The physician should and may do nothing else but preserve the life. Table of Contents
Executive Summary Methods Key findings Building on research Introduction Background Methods
Study site and population Findings Youth testing experiences. However, a person's natural instinct
can often keep them alive, even throughout pain and suffering. In fact, some biographical lives are
flat wrong if you want to be the best male prostitute you can be. The action you just performed
triggered the security solution. The good news is that your search for someone who can 'do my
homework' is over. The major argument for euthanasia is that people who are in unbearable pain
shouldn't have to suffer. The word intentional is the key term in this definition, because if the killing
is not intentional, then it does not fall under the jurisdiction of euthanasia ( Euthanasia Definitions
2012).
First of all we guarantee the highest quality of our work. In the second case, another man named
Jones plans to drown his cousin but passively watches as the child accidentally falls and drowns.
When seeking a solution to a moral dilemma you take into account the consequences and the
potential consequences of this issue of euthanasia and decide on balance the action that is going to
work to the advantage of all concerned. Dog Days: “We love him; he’s ruining our lives” states loyal
caregiver, Louise Aronson, about her family dog, Byron (Aronson, 17). However, both fall under the
term 'euthanasia', therefore creating the question; Should euthanasia be legal. Many people would
rather end their life rather than live it with pain and this has led to the notion. What is the use in
keeping someone alive to suffer. James Rachels has offered some other arguments that work
differently. Hence, it would be inappropriate to employ active euthanasia on individuals who are
worsening their condition due to mental discouragement. At the core of the euthanasia debate lies
the distinction between active and passive euthanasia. Assisted dying is legalised and regulated in
the US States of Oregon and Washington. Conversely, active euthanasia, which is less well-known,
involves actively causing someone’s death. The Supreme Court, however, said there should be
adequate safeguards and implementation of living will would be subject to medical board's certifying
that the patient's comatose state is irreversible. The moral dilemma between passive and active
euthanasia is evident in the medical world. As euthanasia is seen as immoral, and in most countries is
illegal, it is rarely performed. The good news is that your search for someone who can 'do my
homework' is over. This means that a terminally-ill patient is administered a lethal drug or substance
intentionally in order for them to pass away peacefully, in this case, in the event of terminal illness.
Voluntary euthanasia is an act of commission; a positive, deliberate action e.g. administering tablets
deliberately to bring death. The passive variety is accepted in most countries and considered as a
patient right in some. But in a post-mortem carried out by a coroner, called Llibusia Dragowich, it
was discovered that out of thirty-nine patients: Ten were suffering from a terminal disease, twenty-
six were in a little pain but death was not an option and three had nothing wrong with them at all.
Over a period of decades, Sovereign developed several controversial ideas related to death. While
smokers definitely gain something out of it, non-smokers are concerned with the risks it poses on
human health. Sometimes I had no time to do my homework or the tasks were too hard for me to
complete. While smokers definitely gain something out of it, non-smokers are concerned with the
risks it poses on human health. Termed the Medical Treatment of Terminally Ill Patients (Protection
of Patients and Medical Practitioners) Bill, the draft was released by the Union Health Ministry in
2016 based on the Law Commission of India’s Report No. 241 (August 2012). The government,
however, also said it does not support granting people the right to make “Living Wills”, which would
let them decide whether they want to be put on life support in case of terminal illness. In many
countries, the legal status of active and passive euthanasia is unclear or controversial. Appeals for
non- voluntary and involuntary euthanasia are also common in cases wherein the cost of keeping the
patient alive with no signs of improvement are very high. According to his lawyer Geoffrey Bigger,
Sovereign assisted in the deaths of 130 terminally ill people between 1 990 and 1998. Learn More It
suffices to mention that many believe that passive euthanasia is morally right compared to active
euthanasia. Try to stop a man from putting another man to death and nothing would happen”.
At this stage in a person's life, they probably do not wish to be alive any longer, and therefore would
like to be able to receive euthanasia, but cannot, as it is illegal. Milan Kundera wrote, “Dogs do not
have many advantages over people, but one of them is extremely important: euthanasia is not
forbidden by law in their case; animals have the right to a merciful death.” Furthermore, situation
ethics could be used to support voluntary euthanasia. Christianity states that birth, life and death are
all a part of God's processes and that people should respect them and do not have the right to end it
themselves, as it would offend God. “Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and
that God’s Spirit dwells in your midst. John Stuart Mill commented, “over himself, over his own
body and mind, the individual is sovereign.” The second argument is the compassion argument,
which is closely linked to both utilitarianism and situation ethics. The major argument for euthanasia
is that people who are in unbearable pain shouldn't have to suffer. Its New York headquarters
supports a global network of regional and country offices. What is the use in keeping someone alive
to suffer. Nowadays college and university students find themselves under great pressure. It is the
deliberate putting to death, in an easy, painless way, of an individual suffering from an incurable and
agonizing disease. As we know many diseases bring about excruciating amount of pain and make
living very difficult. However, euthanasia is often essentially manslaughter (David Lanham 1993),
therefore creating an ethical issue as to whether euthanasia should be allowed to occur. James
Rachels argues that morality and religion are separate entities. However, making the pain go away is
a big difference to actually ending somebody's life. The right to life should not be treated lightly,
especially when confronted with overwhelming adversity. One of these arguments is that if we make
it legal then people will take advantage of the system. It is not just dying with dignity, there is more
to it. The act of rejecting the surgery is considered immoral because the parents prefer their baby to
be deceased rather than enduring lifelong difficulties. Our company has been working in the sphere
for long and we have got good results so far. In this case, the patient himself requests that he should
be put to death. Oh, you who prolonged my life, Take back a gift that I detest. Nota Bene: The first
method is passive euthanasi a. Learn More It suffices to mention that many believe that passive
euthanasia is morally right compared to active euthanasia. The argument is that Euthanasia happens
and will always be here with us, and the best thing to do is to set meaningful laws that will control it.
Over a period of decades, Sovereign developed several controversial ideas related to death. He had
talked to them and got an idea into their reasons for dying. Rachels acknowledges that active and
passive euthanasia may have significant moral distinctions based on their consequences. The final
argument relates to public policy; if we make voluntary euthanasia legal, we will be able to control
how it is performed. There are two types of students: active and passive. According to Rachels,
active euthanasia is frequently more compassionate than passive euthanasia and he critiques the
traditional belief for resulting in judgments influenced by irrelevant factors. Some mostly
philosophers go even further and say that active euthanasia is morally better because it can be quicker
and cleaner, and it may be less painful for the patient.