Causes of construction reworks and their mitigation

strategies

‫األسباب المؤدية إلعادة األعمال باإلنشاءات وطرق تقليل التأخير‬

by

KAMRAN HAYAT
Dissertation submitted in fulfilment
of the requirements for the degree of
MSc PROJECT MANAGEMENT
at
The British University in Dubai.

October 2018
 COPYRIGHT AND INFORMATION TO USERS

The author whose copyright is declared on the title page of the work has granted to the
British University in Dubai the right to lend his/her research work to users of its library and
to make partial or single copies for educational and research use.

The author has also granted permission to the University to keep or make a digital copy for
similar use and for the purpose of preservation of the work digitally.

Multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by either the author, the
Registrar or the Dean only.

Copying for financial gain shall only be allowed with the author’s express permission.

Any use of this work in whole or in part shall respect the moral rights of the author to be
acknowledged and to reflect in good faith and without detriment the meaning of the content,
and the original authorship.
Abstract

Projects always having a limited time period and each of them are versatile in concept. With

due regards especially construction sector facing a difficulties facing many problems but one

of the major is rework. This all is due to limitless requirements and unforeseen

circumstances. Therefore this project management dissertation is about digging deep causes

of project reworks as well as its mitigation ways consisting of literature review which ends

up with conceptual model and developed 5 hypothesis which is core of my survey

questionnaire. Its factors mainly includes reasons of project works repetitions are poor

project managements , un maintained project machinery and less manpower , countries

overall surround situations, project design confusions , stakeholder concerns and week

communication plans. On the opposite side reworks mitigation plan consists of better quality

assurance/control methods, better condition project machines and efficient staff and

professional workers, owner demand oriented, and better communications procedures. These

hypothesis conclusions made on SPSS results whose base is professionals reply on

questionnaire.

Later 3 project reworks records goggled from my professional history , meetings done

with management’s team about the problems faced due to reworks on projects.3 reworks case

studies discussed in tabular from and shown their results in terms of effects of project

schedule, project cost, and project quality in graphical representation.

Further going forward hypothesis results and case studies comparison discussed which

concluded that literature review, SPSS results and case studies are totally aligned about route

causes and further mitigation techniques.

Later writer highlighted strategy planning approach and reduction of reworks by

performance management techniques, reworks risk considerations and lately dissertation

recommended to build an innovative teams on the project which is the only way of reducing

the reworks on the projects.

Survey questionnaire prepared considering the literature review on project reworks and its

mitigation strategies further considering views of market professionals. SPSS used to analysis

the professional feedback and 3 project case studies tabulated after extensive interviews.

Going further comparison done between SPSS analysis and 3 case studies. Lastly highlights

done on strategy and building innovative team which reduces project reworks.

This dissertation shown six causes of reworks and five mitigation techniques to reduce the

reworks. Main causes of works reputation are poor project management team, less manpower

and non-maintained construction machinery, country political situation, Week project

documents, stakeholders and communication problems and weak commination between

project team. In mitigation techniques consists of best quality control procedures, competent

staff and skilled workers, Owner demand focused, reviewing the project documents and

controlled communication.

Considering the above objective conceptual model prepared following the questionnaire.

Later these factors will be analyzed to computer the significance and variance of independent

factors on depend factors. By reducing the reworks , client feel more comfortable and

satisfied, company market value increases ,less wastage of material, reduce waste and time,

fatigue and tension will be less among staff , more comfortable and safe work environment

can be achieved.

SPSS results on professional feedback re confirmed that above stated causes from literature

review prompts the works repetition on the project and stated above mitigation strategies
reduces the reworks dramatically which controls project cost and schedule. Positive variance

achieved by seeing regression results, the highest variance noted 28.6 % by implementing by

applying global factors. Further R square results show that implementation of QA/QC

principles added maximum variance which is 27.9 percent to improve project management

which reduces the reworks.

Going further deep in practical life all 3 cases studies reworks caused due to above

highlighted discrepancies on the project which really caused project completion over cost and

over schedule.

he student has not find opportunity working long time in building industry so no that deep

technical details in this desertion about causes of reworks in building construction works and

their resolutions .This assignment is only covering infrastructure part of civil works around

gulf but mostly in UAE.

This dissertations will guide infrastructure managers to achieve project milestones and key

performance indicators by keeping in mind works end results .This dissertations is one among

value addition in current project management library. Finally it really a useful guide for

managers to keep project on schedule and on track especially at difficult times.

The writer wishes that due to unlimited complications in construction industry manager shall

always keep in mind that with in no time project may enter into works repetition stage which

would be enough loosing owner trust. So professionals to discover the strategies to complete

on schedule and on cost project by reducing projects reworks.

 ‫ملخص الدراسة‬

‫المشاريع لديها دائما فترة زمنية محدودة ولكل مشروع منها تنوعا في المفهوم‪ .‬و بالنظر إلى قطاع‬
‫اإلنشاءات وخاصة قطاع البناء الذي يواجهه العديد من ا‬

‫لصعوبات و المشاكل الكبرى و منها إعادة تنفيذ األعمال بالمشروع‪ .‬كل هذا يرجع إلى المتطلبات الغير‬
‫محددة و الظروف الغير متوقعة‪ .‬لذا فإن هذه الدراسة حول إدارة المشروع التى تعنى بالبحث في‬
‫األسباب العميقة المؤديه إلعادة األعمال بالمشروع باإلضافة إلى طرق تقليل التأخير والتي تناقش‬
‫باإلطار النظري للبحث و تنتهي بنموذج مفاهيمي وتطوير ‪ 5‬فرضيات والتي تشكل جوهر استبيان المسح‬
‫الخاص بي‪ .‬وتتضمن العوامل بشكل رئيسي أسباب تكرار أعمال المشروع‪ ،‬وهي كالتالي إدارة ضعيفة‬
‫للمشروعات وعدم صيانة معدات المشروع وقلة القوى العاملة والحالة العامة المحيطة بالبلد واإلرتباكات‬
‫المتعلقه بتصميم المشروع ومخاوف المالكين القائمين على المشروع وضعف التخطيط والتنسيق الداخلى‬

‫على الجانب اآلخر‪ ،‬تتكون خطة تقليل التأخير من التالي‪ :‬أساليب أفضل لإلنتاج ‪ /‬مراقبة أفضل للجودة‬
‫وتحسين أوضاع معدات المشروع وتحسين كفاءة الموظفين والعاملين المهنيين وتحقيق متطلبات المالكين‬
‫والقائمين على المشروع وتحقيق إجراءات أفضل للتنسيق واالتصال الداخلي‪ .‬هذه االستنتاجات التي تم‬
‫معالجتها ببرنامج ‪ SPSS‬وهوقاعدة المهنيين للتحقق من االستبيانات‪.‬‬

‫و من منطلق خبرتي لسجالت إعادة أعمال المشروع التى تم تدقيقها من تاريخي المهني‪ ،‬واالجتماعات‬
‫التي أجريناها مع فريق اإلدارة حول المشاكل التي تواجهها بسبب إعادة األعمال المشاريع‪ .‬ثالثة حاالت‬
‫للدراسة تمت مناقشتها في جدول وعرضت نتائجها من حيث آثارها على الجدول الزمني للمشروع وتكلفة‬
‫المشروع وجودة المشروع في التمثيل البياني‪.‬‬

‫وبالمضي قدما ً ومواصلة نتائج الفرضية ومقارنة دراسات الحالة التي خلصت المناقشة النظريه للبحث‬
‫ونتائج ‪ SPSS‬ودراسات الحالة تتماشى تماما مع أسباب المؤديه للتأخير وتقنيات تخفيف تأخير المشروع‪.‬‬

‫وشدد الكاتب في وقت الحق على نهج التخطيط االستراتيجي والحد من إعادة األعمال بالمشروع من‬
‫خالل تقنيات إدارة األداء وباألخير فإن هذه الدراسة تببن كيفية بناء فريق لديه أفكار مبتكرة بالمشروع‬
‫وهي الطريقة الوحيدة للحد من إعادة األعمال بالمشاريع‪.‬‬
Table of Contents

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Problem……………………………………………………………………...……....…...........2
1.4 Gap……………………………………………………………………………..………..…….3
1.5 Aim……………………………………………………………………………..………...…... 3
1.6 objectives……………………………………………………………………………….…...…4
1.7 Scope …………………………………………………………………...………………........ 4
1.8 Research Question …………………...…..…………………………...………………..…..….4

CHAPTER 2: Literature Review .................................................................................................. 6

2.3 Causes of Rework ..................................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Mitigation Strategies ............................................................................................................... 12
2.5 Conceptual Model ................................................................................................................... 15

CHAPTER 3: Research Methodology ....................................................................................... 17

3.1 Pilot ......................................................................................................................................... 18
3.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 19
3.3 Independent variables .............................................................................................................. 19
3.4 Dependent Variables ................................................................................................................ 19
3.5 Hypothesis ................................................................................................................................ 19

CHAPTER 4: Results & discussion………………………………………….………………........22

CHAPTER 5: Case studies………………………………..……………………...……………….41

5.1 Introduction to case study 1………………………………………………………………….41
5.1.4 Analysis & result of case study 1…………………………………….…………………….45
5.2 introduction to case study 2…………………………………………………………………..46
5.2.3 Analysis & result of case study 2………….……………………………………………….51
5.3 introduction to case study 3………………………………………………….………….…....51
5.3.3 Analysis & result of case study 3………….…………………………………………….…55

CHAPTER 6; Comparison
6.1.1 Week management vs. quality implementation…….………………………………………56
6.1.2 Project document application Vs. Careful Review and restudy prior application………….57
6.1.3 Reworks Mitigation global strategies Vs. Usual project management practices…..……….57
6.1.4 Controlled communication vs. project communications…………………………………...58
i
6.1.5 Competent staff & skilled manpower vs. project resources……………………………...…59

CHAPTER 7;
7.1.1 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................63
7.1.2Recommendation....................................................................................................................64
7.2.2 Risk calculation and their sharing………………….………………………………………..65
7.3.1 Efficient team members……………………………………………….…………………….67
7.3.2 Reviewing plans enhances efficiencies…………………………………….………………..67
7.3.3 Positive Culture Among team Members………………..………………...…………………67
Reference .......................................................................................................................................67
Questionnaire …………………………………………………………………………………….69

ii
Chapter No 1

1.1 Introduction

In this chapter literature gathered which is about explaining construction sector role in developing

countries economy, past literature about problems in construction sector which concludes project

reworks are among the major causes .Going further deep literature added about versatility of

construction works and many different definitions of project reworks. Later stated that how

reworks impacts project manager’s performances, project milestones and KPIs addition to

pressure from owner and regulatory agencies. Chapter 1 last part states about gaps in discovering

the project reworks following dissertation aim , objective ,scope and research question which

relates to rework causes, mitigation strategies and 3 case studies .

1.2 Back ground

Construction projects are always core of economy in developing countries as well as in developed

countries. Each country according to its economy use to spend money on buildings and

infrastructure projects (Al-Ahram and Ensley, 2013). During last 10 years majority of projects

completed by over schedule as well as over cost and due reason its alarming subject in the

industry , After investigations reworks found among the core reasons which causes schedule or

project cost overrun (Akintoye et al., 2014).

Many definitions have been stated about reworks, among these definitions some are, reworks are

said to be deliverables which are one completed at the project but unfortunately its required to be

done again which is due to any type of discrepancy that is must to be in cooperated on the project,

the cause may be any could be a variation, change in scope, poor works quality and so on (Fayek,

et al. 2003). It’s finally concluded by industrial professionals the reworks are major cause of delay

on projects, although some other definitions where reworks come up as important factor which

added days in the project as well as increased its cost (Chan and Kumaraswamy, 1997; Thomas
1
and Neapolitan, 1994).Going further literature states that deviation from quality always brings

reworks (Burati et al. 1992). nonconformance generates reworks ” (Abdul-Rahman, 1995) , again

project quality failure originates reworks (Barber et al. 2000).based on different ways of defining

in project management books , Love (2002) describes reworks as ‘the way of completion in order

to ensure that basic demand are fulfilled by implementing corrections’ (Ashford, 1992) also ‘

performing to improve something by repetition which might be due to nonconformance

requirements’(Construction Industry Development Agency, 1995). ). Love et al. (2000) states that

rework may be think as ‘extra energy utilization of redoing a deliverable or the works that was not

handled properly once’. Love et al. (1997) defines the rework after a deep study as there are some

parameters which are not being cared for example, staff, project documents, stakeholders etc.

Now going further studies showed that causes of works repetitions and project delays vary from

developing countries or developed countries (Shebob et al., 2012).There is no doubt that

constructions works are complicated and involve unlimited hazards. Over and above projects use

to be different in works , different in cost , different in team members , diffident in locations ,

different in environment and additional complications added by complex and long contract

documents and lot of human resource requirements (Dadzie et al., 2012; Ahiaga-Dagbui and

Smith, 2014).

1.3 Problem

Project manager outputs are deeply affected due to project challenging environment and its

versatility on the other side everyone is expecting project on schedule and cost completion

sometimes shall have to save cost although unforeseen and uncalculated discrepancies (Enshassi

et al., 2003, 2008).

2
Project key performance indicators and mile stones are directly affected due to reworks which

originate due to poor management. On the other side project is only successful when it will be

competed according to stakeholder’s owner’s vision and objectives (Hwang and Leong, 2013).

Projects use to be surrounded lot of danger of reworks, many industrial countries conclude that

projects demands extra 7 percent to 21 percent extra only due to eruptions of project reworks (Ye

et al., 2014). Government as well as private sectors adding lot of extra money due to reworks

originated due to many reasons not only at execution stage but during guarantee period and even

beyond (Kakitahi et al., 2013). Wanberg et al. (2013) states that if quality documents shall be best

implemented its may reduce huge amount of project reworks.

1.4 GAP

Work repetitions are major reason of project schedule disturbance as well as project over budget

.Its true it’s not easy to control. So after lot of loses due to rework it felt to deeply dig the deep

reasons of doing the same work another time. (Akin, 1986; Miller, 1993; Rounce, 1998; Love and

Li, 2000) describes 3 major causes of works repetition are project design problems, improper way

of works execution, and week project team.

1.5 Aim

To understand the deep reason which erupts works repetition on projects and comparison of

literature with 3 project case studies, therefore expending exposure to accomplish projects by

minimizing reworks on projects.

3
1.6 Objectives

 To explore causes of reworks on construction projects.

 To understand how poor project management team , unskilled manpower and

unmaintained machinery , countries political situation , Weak project documents ,

stakeholders discrepancies and miscommunication makes a ground for works repetition.

 To elaborate and explain the ways like project quality assurance and control, professional

and experienced work force, Owner demand focused team, reviewing the project

documents, coordinated communications can reduce the project reworks.

 3 projects reworks case study to understand on ground reasons for eruption of reworks and

graphical representation of project conditions.

 General Risks on every project which triggers the reworks.

 |Comparison between SPSS results and case studies later findings and results.

 Strategy planning approach and reduction of reworks by performance management

techniques.

1.7 Scope

Works repetition affects project in many ways .This dissertation is only limited to discover the

reworks reasons, how to mitigate the reworks in order for smooth project completion. 3 project

case studies showing the actual ground reasons of works repetition causes, comparison between

literature view and case studies ground reasons. Lastly explained strategy planning approach and

performance management techniques which minimizes project reworks.

1.8 Research question

The main concept of reworks to explore reasons of behind works repetitions on projects , how to

minimize project reworks and better mitigation .3 case studies to understand the ground actual

4
reworks erupted in gulf areas especially in UAE .Comparison between reworks erupted in UAE

and SPSS results. This project statement is better explained by the below principal line.

5
2 Chapter 2

Literature Review about Causes & Mitigation of Project Reworks.

2.1 Introduction

In second chapter literature explains in detail about 5 influential factors which originates danger to

project reworks which are related to owner, design, contractor, vendor and transport. Probability

of project reworks dramatically increases if project is having poor project management, no

maintained machinery, poor market dynamics understanding, project documents complications,

and supplier and communications issues. Inoder to counter the limit less challenges project team

needs to apply quality control procedures, hiring of professional staff and best machinery,

dynamic market strategy, deep restudy of project case and balance communications. Chapter 2 last

highlights about literature review references in tabular form following 2 conceptual models which

are reworks causes and its mitigation.

2.2 Literature Review

Davis et al. (1989), states that there are some influential factors which originates the rework

on construction projects. These influential factors are five in numbers .Further illustration may we

find in below table.

Reworks related to owner.

Reworks related to design.

Reworks related to contractor.

Reworks related to vendor.

Reworks related to transport.

6
2.2.1 Reworks related to owner.

There are some reworks which originated from clients actions .Normally these items belongs to

weak project experience and unaware of design issues , not knowing the technicalities’ involved

on projects , less project cost nominated for project deep study , misleading communication with

project management team / consultants and discrepancies in managing contract documents. Each

factor stated above drags the project from on schedule and on cost project completion. Any of

above deliverable is a reason for project deviations, project errors and reworks (Daly and

Crawhaw, 1973). Literature also states that best way to tackle the owner issues is to emphasis on

better communication approach (walker, 1994).

About reworks (British dictionary) states as to enrich or develop the excellence of the executed

work for the purpose of matching with the owner demand or to compete the local or international

market either improving its value (Hornby, 2015).Reworks can be defined as completing any type

of assigned task by redoing some of its action repetition (Love et al., 2015) states that project

reworks are the outcomes of unintended or rapid/swift accomplishment of deliverables by even

not caring /bothering the project quality.

2.2.2 Reworks related to design

Whenever discrepancies found in project papers, then it’s the design consultant to provide revised

design updates and alarm construction team about any type of risk of variation (CII , 1990).In case

of any type of miscommunication or failure results in rework whenever stakeholders decides

their own /otherwise (Josephson and Hammarlund 1999). The literature written by (Love & Li,

2000) states that main rework reason come up due to lake of cooperation/coordination as well as

weak team’s interaction and stopping project knowledge flow. On the other side gaps noted

between project engineers and architects always pave the way for errors in drawings and scale

mistakes which discovered only when it’s noted the reworks happened (Love et al. 2012).
7
2.2.3 Reworks related to contractor.

The professionalism of contractor is mandatory to emphasis best cooperation of all other

stakeholders and junior staff who are on the same track and will be part of accomplishing the

projects (Chan 1998; Walker 1994). The technique will help in better management of stakeholders

and team members .As per meeting took place on business happened on 1982, it resulted that

incapability of engineers to implemented project schedule properly , activates breakdown

discrepancies concludes errors which only ends with reworks on the projects. Additional research

made by Cusack (1992) states that poor follow-up on project quality outcomes for example poor

selection of subcontractors , poor skilled workers , weak project supervision results in 10

percent rise in project amount which is due to triggering of reworks.

2.2.4 Reworks related to vendors.

Project team members taking care of the project procurement must be upgraded in a way to

minimize the project reworks going forward in the project completion (Love et al. , 1999). This

is universal truth that completion of project on schedule and on cost deeply dependent of

stakeholders interest (Chan, 1998: Faniran et al., 1999; Walker, 1994). It is additionally noted that

low quality material preferences always originates reworks (Josephson et al. 2002).

2.2.5 Reworks related to Transporter

Transportation shall be handled carefully , any change in transport schedule causes of risk of less

knowledge for new driver to ensure safety , may cause mishap or accident , complication on

construction site which all ultimately results in reworks and sometime life loss which is not atoll

recoverable ( Chan , 1998).

8
2.3 Reworks causes

Controlling budget in order to align project with impractical schedule/ milestones most of time

results imbalance of project which keep adding of works repetition (Hwang and Low, 2012). (Ye

et al., 2014) Most of the time development of unreasonable race culture among team members and

weak/poor project management techniques concludes to nervousness and fatigue in the teams

which unfortunately ends up with repetition of the works as well as schedule delay. There is no

doubt repeating the uncontrolled tasks is major challenge especially in civil works industry

internationally , many literatures highlights that repetition of works adds five to twenty percent on

project cost in addition to project schedule delays. Let talk about Singapore reworks which usually

occurs due to poor quality management has resulted 24 to32 percent late completions from

calculated project schedule which surly adding dramatic escalation on the project cost (Hwang and

Yang, 2014). (Hwang et al, 2013) concluded that week and unrealistic project management is the

major reason of repetition of works not only in private sector but especially in government sectors.

So Poor project management is one of the root causes of reworks on project which leads to

project failures.

Poor construction machinery and low quality of work is categorized as second critical factor

which results in rework in engineering projects (Ye et al., 2014). (Mamman and Omozokpia ,

2014) explained that less professional staff , low quality of construction material and resources ,

rejections of site works after comparing it to project documents and schedule , less resources

comparing to histogram , high rental equipment rate are major causes which dramatically effects

projects timely and quality completion. (Doloi et al., 2012) concluded that unstructured manpower

coordination are high utmost reason for rework. Technicians and engineers having strong

educational back ground and experience are backbone in executing industrial and construction
9
projects further its management responsibility in guiding their staff f to ultimate project goal. This

concludes that project insufficient project resources erupts the reworks on projects.

While talking about commercial and owner are another major factor which adds repetition or

reworks on construction projects which results in affecting all stakeholders on the project

including the owner, results in project over schedule and over budget (Hwang and Yang,

2014).Such scenario is also explained by (Hwang et al., 2009) and (Abdul-Rahman et al., 2016);

both are stating the issue as, project revisions and changes due to owner decisions are escalating

and prompting the project reworks and results turbulence in team members. (Uttam and Bhirud

,2015) describes that major reason of variations demand is owner instruction to revise part of

projects or comments of project schedule. Some additional causes of repetitions of the works are

changing the project scope, revision of project specification, change in material procurement etc.

(Akinsiku et al., 2012) Due to project versatile scenarios most of time unpredictable event elapse

of the project whose cost normally beard by the owner and sometime falls in court of owner.

These unpredictable events might be any universal adversity, countries political changing

scenarios, changing the countries governmental authorities regulations are some of core points

which affects project plan and may cause the reworks on project .Final we may states that market

and countries situations are among reasons of repetition of works.

Design revisions / Errors / changes in drawings, specifications, and bill of quantities are another

source of causes of reworks on projects (Abdul-Rahman et al., 2016). Stepping further (Ye et al.,

2014) concludes that errors erupted on reasons of less understanding of project objective and

scope of among the reasons of reputation of project works. Weak design and deep contractual

techniques also leads to project failure. Weak project documents proved with professional

experience destabilize the project required outcomes. In professional upper level of management
10
of projects and their way talking the project documents leads to revisions and repetition of works

(Hwang and Yang, 2014). On the other side project teams some time not successful in capturing

the errors even at stage of implementation which surely opens the door for project failure and

reworks. From project management prospective unreasonable project time schedule erupts the

uncertainty on the project and lead the project to disputes and failures (Al-Kharashi & Skitmore

2009; Mpofu et al., 2017).

The project successful finishing or incompletion from perspective of its cost basis on type of

project owner, design team, main contractor and its subordinates. Major reason of project success

is totally the core perceptions of valuable professional’s staff who comes forward and makes

decisions at the spot when required (Ansah et al, 2016a). On the other side stakeholders are big

teams having versatile experience , knowledge , vision , abilitites.Only solution to lead by line is

best communications techniques and on schedule weekly or monthly meetings according to

project requirements. Whenever stakeholder is not acting as project demand requires it

immediately triggers project reworks which later drags to failure. On the other way round due to

project dynamic situations right decisions come up on time by implementation of best strategies,

which results finally in timely project completion. Poor quality control in manufacturing industry

come up 3rd reason for repetition of reworks in China (Akinsiku et al., 2012).This concludes that

stakeholder poor interest and their weak cooperation/coordination with each other make

ground of project reworks.

Works Repetition most of time erupted due to unreasonable less spending either from contractor

end or its lies on client part ,hiding bits of information between stakeholders, delay answering

from owner, weak communication among project parties , many errors in contract documents

(Owalabi et al., 2014). Project changes are main cause of repetition of works , literature states that
11
causes of variations is mainly results of unplanned project meetings , weak communications

between project parties, on top of them delay involvement of main contractors on projects (Uttam

and Bhirud, 2015). This concludes that poor communication erupts works repetitions of the

planned project.

2.4 REWORK MITIGATION STRATEGIES.

Implementation of Project quality considerable improves project performance and help in on

schedule and on cost project completion which in inversely proportional to reworks on project site

(Lahdenpera and Koppinen, 2003).

It is necessary to develop a strategy for win-win situation of all companies.

Zairi (1996, p. 35) studies conclude that core mile stones shall be established, these mile stones

can be:

Bench markings can be done as points to achieve targets.

Team can be guided by establishing standard.

Quality Competition can be develop among different teams

Auditing can be as a best practice of avoiding rework.

Projects involving deep technicalities can be best managed by facilitating project staff and awards

system implementation .This management system is better than poor facilitating staff techniques

(Meng and Gallagher, 2012). So many literatures write about implementing award system often

leads to much better results specifically in harsh and difficult scenarios. Such incentives will not

only improves project goals but as well as help in improving better relations which is the winning

point for the management (Martin, 2003; Kohlmeyer and Drake, 2008).So results states that

bonuses awards to deserving team members and workforce develop works interests in the staff

which ultimately reduces to repetition of project works.

12
Change management is one of the factors which help in reducing project reworks. Sure its

requires a dynamics on project on day to day activities for successful completion of project. It’s

very important to keep in mind client’s attitude to be managed similar pattern. Each owner and

project is running on some basic points which shall never be missed from day to day strategy

(Kelly et al., 1992; Kamara and Anumba, 2000; Yu, 2007 and Yu et al., 2010b). (Hwang and

Yang, 2014) describes that companies who always updates their management techniques

accordingly results project completion smoothly which means reduction of works repetition of

works considerable. Change management techniques must be implemented from early start of

project to originate better results and over and above owner satisfaction. Change management

shall not only be implemented internally insider of the company but its vision shall extend to

beyond the sense which is internationally as well as around the region itself and revise the strategy

accordingly. Although it require another set of team members but by the strategy company will

emerge among performing company and dramatically improve performance and works repetition

will automatically reduce (Oakland and Sohal, 1996). (Hwang and Low, 2012) concludes that

stakeholders who use to thoroughly investigate the market and later according align their

management policies and strategies results in considerable reduction of reworks on projects.

Tender documents / feasibility documents are the base of creating lot of detailed project

documents, means they are core of the project success. A detailed studies as well as research by

saying without any discrepancies help in project successful completion and achieving project mile

stones (Hwang and Yang, 2014). Project initial detailed study and finalizing reasonable project

key performance indicators improve successful chances of completion and reduces project works

repetition as well project budget and timelines be controlled. Execution of project works by

planning reduced level of repetition of works always lead to project success as well as improve

13
project quality and enhance procedures (Schaffer, 1992).So in conclusion project deep vigilant

study may reduce considerable amount of project reworks.

(Blyth and Worthington, 2001) concludes that all team stakeholders must be on same page of

communication. (Kujala et al., 2005; Arayici et al., 2006) The owner is the one who is investing

on the project and as well he ultimately has to bear the good or bad from the projects. So he must

be heard loudly among all the stakeholders. Their requirement shall be on high priority and shall

be addressed at earliest. Knowing most of owners always having defensive strategy during

execution of project due reasons may be about job assurity.In any case their trust and involvement

of projects is absolutely impacting. (Chan and Kumaraswamy , 2002) states that efficient

communication lines among stakeholders and owner can be helpful in smooth landing of

project and so results in less complications and reductions in reworks.

14
2.5 Conceptual Model, Causes of Rework

15
2.6 Conceptual Model, Rework mitigation.

16
3 Chapter 3

Research Methodology.

3.1 Introduction

There are qualitative & quantitative research approches. In qualitative research methods are

narrative research, phenomenal research, ground theory, ethnographic research & case study. This

research consist of quantitative research in which methods used are random probability

sampling where as other types are systematic , stratified , cluster and quota and non-probability

sampling can be done by convenience sampling and snowball sampling.

In this dissertation survey questionnaire prepared carefully to conclude hypothesis results where

data scale is nominal and ordinal. Respondent data placed in variable view and respondent results

placed in data view on SPSS.

Hypothesis

HI: Control quality procedures affect the higher management results & projects outcomes.

H2: Deep review of construction projects adds value in enhancement of project contract

papers which includes specification, bill of quantities and FIDIC conditions etc.

H3: Global dependent factors in literature review effect positively to global independent

factors.

H4: Better implementation of communication procedures improves project outcomes.

H5: Competent staff and skilled manpower can help in reducing the resources related

problems.
17
3.2 Pilot testing

Data scale consists of nominal and ordinal .Writer tried his best about precision of ordinal factors,

cohesiveness of the items and further ensured that it’s direct relation with research objective

including aim by taking into consideration of professional advice. Finally the survey paper was

reviewed in a way to reduce complication , rational approach and easy to work on and straight

forward (Goh and Abdul-Rahman , 2013) , after extensive repetition questionnaire was handed

over to 20 management members to confirm that its elaborative , reliable and complete (Love and

sing , 2013).

3.3 Independent Variables

Earlier researches has studied about independent variables and their enter relation to each other

.Inspire still projects are suffering from schedule and cost overrun, as each project is unique and

having its own challenges. This research further elaborate the critical factors which causes the

rework on construction projects and how to have a successful mitigation .These variables are

already validated in earlier researches. The factor studied in this assignment is used by many other

researchers including (Fayek et al., 2003; Hwang and Yang, 2014; Josephson et al., 2002; Love,

2002, Abdul-Rahman et al., 2016) and others as mentioned in literature review.

3.4 Dependent Variables

These variables are registered how best we can avoid reworks to have a best project progress.

These dependent variables add value to current literature. Note that earlier studies has been done

but still we are unable to control the project at ultimate .We need to look further beyond to these

dependent factors. In this study the mitigation dependent variables are week project management ,

18
old machinery and unskilled manpower, region situation, design issues , supplier and

communication issues.

3.5 Methodology

Survey questionnaire written by deep studying literature review. It constitutes of major factors

which are active in causing the reworks and further mitigation techniques to control the

construction reworks. Survey papers are having four portions. Its first part explains about ethics

and explains the professionals about creating and importance of research study. Following the

ethical there is demographic section. Later 6 factors which are having 27 items are highlighted

which are core causes of reworks. Then 5 mitigation factors which are having 20 items are

organized in tabular form. Professionals are requested to show them opinions on five-point data

coding system according to each of expertise and professional experience.

Independent Variables Dependent Variables

Rework Mitigation Root reasons of

Techniques Project Rework

Application of quality control Poor project Management

procedures

Professional staff & maintained Non maintained machinery and

project machinery incompetent manpower.

Dynamic market strategy Dynamic market

Project contract complications

Deep project study
Project supplier complications

Balance communication Poor Communication

19
Writer worked hard about reliability check points which are items cohesiveness, factors precision

including ensured that all study relates to basic aim and assignment objectives with help of

industry professionals. Finally question papers deeply reviewed to eliminate any concern to reader

and make required questions short and well understandable.

The research paper has been completed by sending survey paper hard copies in addition to

convenience sampling. One of difficulty faced was UAE population consisted of considerable

percentage of expatriates with busy job routines and other busy commitments. It was the hardest

part in collecting appropriate replies from the professional people. In result I was successful in

getting the limited response and appropriate answers were another big challenge (Ellsberg and

Hesis, 2005).

In order to complete the survey works the question papers delivered via monkey survey, mails as

well as hard copies. Survey reply was on average but its noted that some of professionals did not

study well in order having appropriate replies.Quation paper was delivered to 300 professional

engineer among 103 find appropriate for further working in order finding crombak alpha ,

regression and correlations in SPSS software. PIE chart details.

I gathered 175 professionals for answering the questionnaire by my own people circle it’s become

only possible as I been in this country form last 18 years but it was not sufficient additionally I

take help from BUID colleagues as well as from media help .Over than I ask my friends to help

me by their similar fields colleagues.

Time arrived for collection of samples I was successful in collecting 155 filled questionnaire

papers after studying the collected samples I included 101 samples in SPSS for concluding results

and completing the task. Although the responses was less as expected. As construction

20
professionals require lot of efforts for chasing their key performance indicators and over doing

some extra task without being benefited .I wish thank the professional members who provided

nice inputs which made my SPSS results reasonable.

I also noted bit number s of questionnaire reply are inappropriate but respecting their fruitful

inputs I loaded on SPSS so let software shows about regression and other analysis.

21
4 Chapter 4 Results & Discussions

4.1 Introduction

SPSS used to conclude the survey results. Below frequency tables states the frequency numbers

and percentage of respondents replied. Reliability tests test done by using crombach’s alpha which

shall be above .7 which shows data is highly reliable. later correlation table shown to understand

the base for example the significance and arrow direction and strength of variable interactions in

order to understand position of hypotheses. Going further deep regression test done of the data

which calculates the variable value in presence of other variable. If value is higher its concludes

high significance.Results and discussion for crombach’s Alpha.

22
Statistics applied on survey results study as shown in above table. First of all questionnaire

prepared and its reliability measured. Causes of rework and its mitigation ways correlation found

quite significant .Required chornbach alpha is .70, above table shows cronbach alpha .820

highlights that data is highly reliable and no multi collineratiy among the stated variables which I

have referred for generating results.

4.2 Results and discussion for Frequencies

The following is demographic information of surveyors which highlights changes in frequency

and graphical representation of pie for data processed on SPSS.

23
24
25
26
27
In the survey questionnaire 14% respondent is higher management 29 % respondent are middle

management and 50 % respondent are engineers. Among them 22 % was females and 78 percent

are male respondents. 23 percent surveyor have master’s degree and above 54 percent having

graduation and 22 % are having college degree. As UAE is multicultural having less local

population in result 17 % was local respondent and 77 % are expatriate respondents. About

experience 3% respondent was having less than 5 years of experience, 50 percent was having

experience between 6-10 years. 28 percent are having experience between 10-20 years and 13

percent were having experience above 20 years. Regarding age 29 percent respondents are having

28
age between 25 to 35 , 46 percent respondent are having age between 35 to 45 and 24 percent

respondent age is above 45 years further 23 percent surveyor are unmarried and 72 percent are

married.

4.3 Results & Discussion of Correlation

29
Correlation table significance of .05 is highlighted by * and .01 significance is shown by ** . Due

to words limitation I didn’t explain all table but the the symbols are crystal clear.

4.4 Results & Discussion of Regression Analysis

Following quality assurance and quality control methods can improve the project management

outcomes.

4.4.1 below regression analysis table shows results of hypothesis number one how quality

procedures affects the higher management results.

Table highlights that beta .604 showing sig. 000 concludes that applying quality control methods

improves project management results. R square adjusted value 27.9 indicate increase in variance

to project managers key performance indicators which means quality team should involve in site

executions, submittal reviews and other project activities. Value F equal to 21.501 states that data

30
is significant concludes that implementations of quality project audits adds value to project

schedule and cost control which means that reworks reduces dramatically.

Scatterplot

Results concluded that standardize residual is with in range as shown in scatter plot. Clustering is

absent which states that the selected sample is in align with homoscedasticity guess.

Normal p-p plot of regression standardized residual

31
Figure highlights that all the results line in approximately straight diagonal which is from below

left to up right. The result conclude no abnormality as well as it’s linear.

Applying best quality assurance and quality control methods are directly proportional to

improving project staff works, site works quality improves and not the least project performance

indicators meets (Lahdenpera and Koppinen, 2003).Hwang et al. (2013) explains that project

manager play an important role in successful completion of project, engineers better management

considerable reduces the reworks on construction sites not only in government sectors but private

sectors as well.

4.4.2 This study 2nd hypothesis states that deep review of construction projects adds value in enhancement

of project contract papers which includes specification, bill of quantities and fidic conditions.

In above table the regression analysis shows that beta equal to .345, sig is .005 concludes if

construction projects restudy carried out it improves project deliverables and helps in completing

32
the project successfully. In addition R square value is 7.5 percent indicates increase in variance

which indicates that project restudies improves 7.5 percent improvement in design value. Further

F equal to 8.11 indicates data is significant which also heights the positive results can be achieved

by spending some extra time and resources on restudy of project.

Normal p-p plot of regression standardized residual

Figure highlights that all the results line in approximately straight diagonal which is from

below left to up right. The result conclude no abnormality as well as it’s linear.

Scatterplot

Results concluded that standardize residual is with in range as shown in scatter plot.

Clustering is absent which states that the selected sample is in align with homoscedasticity

guess.

33
(Alaryan et al. 2014) states that applying versatile control techniques, deep and elaborative study,

putting extra budget on design documents to review thoroughly and project changes need to be

done at earliest will help in achieving project milestones and reduces lot of reworks.

Project base is the always the initial studies and design documents from where rest detailed

documents are developing .It is only possible in achieving the project desired outcomes and target

if there are minimum variation and only way of reducing the reworks at site and save the project

cost.

4.4.3 3rd hypothesis.Global Independent factors effects positively to global

dependent factors.

In above table beta is .592 showing sig. 000 states that application of quality control procedures ,

competent staff and manpower , focusing on customer demand , reviewing the project case and

better communication can dramatically reduce management weakness , machinery issues , design

issues , supplier issues which is directly proportional in reducing project reworks. Additionally R

square

34
Adjusted R sq. .279 highlights that project performance improves by 27.9 percent by

implementing global dependent factors which reduces project reworks. F equal to 40 is significant

which concludes that construction works progress and milestones achievement can be easily

achieved by implementing subject global factors.

Normal p-p plot of regression standardized residual

Figure highlights that all the results line in approximately straight diagonal which is from below

left to up right. The result conclude no abnormality as well as it’s linear.

Scatterplot

Results concluded that standardize residual is with in range as shown in scatter plot. Clustering is

absent which states that the selected sample is in align with homoscedasticity guess.

35
Alexander and Stevens (2002) argue that five percent should be added to project budget which

shall be utilize on improving project quality and its requirements. It is proved with the times that

better grip on projects takes time parts of which could be type of project customers, digging the

demands of project owner and its customers, understanding project technicalities as each project is

versatile in nature. Competent and professional engineers shall be deployed in gathering and

organizing the project requirements at soon as possible. Project reworks can be considerably

minimized if we better control the quality.

The findings of this assignment conclude that all noted factors considerable impacts the project

and their proper implications influences the construction projects positively. Factors noted was

project staff, project histogram, project documents, country own situation, owners, contractors,

and better communications to be controlled in order to get fruitful project outcomes. To conclude

each project is different from others from its team, area, contract documents, demands,

stakeholders and many more differences. Keep all these aspects competent management team and

engineers require coming up from all these different challenges.

4.4.4 4th hypothesis Better implementation of communication procedures improves project

outcomes.

36
Communication.

Subject table explains that beta .152 showing significance 0 concludes that implementation of

better project communication procedures help in reducing the project reworks, misunderstanding

and confusion additionally R square is highlighting that 5.2 percent variance positive change

happens and project manager may complete project in more easy way.F 6.5 is significant and

illustrates better project outcomes by paying attention to project communication.

Normal p-p plot of regression standardized residual

Figure highlights that all the results line in approximately straight diagonal which is from

below left to up right. The result conclude no abnormality as well as it’s linear.

Scatterplot

37
 Results concluded that standardize residual is with in range as shown in scatter plot.

Clustering is absent which states that the selected sample is in align with homoscedasticity

guess.

Early involvement of contractor on projects make the picture more clear and important

stakeholders valuable inputs enhances the project success chances by reducing project

reworks.intigrated project stakeholders and their collective and clear efforts improves project

performance (Hang & Yang, 2014). Weekly and monthly meetings are better ways to keep client,

contractor, subcontractors, project management team well informed about project updates and

required improvements can put on table and conclude results. Better communication of project

help to understand project complications well ahead and may be sorted out at early stage without

harming the project and better control on cost and schedule which automatically reduces project

reworks (Hang & Yang, 2014).

4.4.5 5th hypothesis

The research fifth hypothesis is that competent staff and skilled manpower can help in

reducing the resources related problems.

38
Above result (β= .180, sig. = .00) confirms that skilled manpower on project reduces the resources

related issues. Competent staff and skilled manpower effects the 7.3 percent positive variance to

resources problems. . F=5.183 is significant at P<.001 which shows that regression table

concludes that resources problem can be sorted out.

Normal p-p plot of regression standardized residual

Figure highlights that all the results line in approximately straight diagonal which is from below

left to up right. The result conclude no abnormality as well as it’s linear.

Scatterplot

Results concluded that standardize residual is within range as shown in scatter plot. Clustering is

absent which states that the selected sample is in align with homoscedasticity guess.

39
Less man-hour than demand triggers Repetition of activities, which results in additional cost as

well as additional time comparing at planning stage (Bibs, 2013).

Technicians and engineers having strong educational back ground and experience are backbone in

executing industrial and construction projects further its management responsibility in guiding

their staff f to ultimate project goal (Hwang and Yang, 2014).

Hwang and Yang (2014) and Ye et al. (2014) research work concludes that hiring of competent

staff and later application of best project management strategies are best methods in controlling

the project problems which later leads to complicated situations.

The results and finding of survey papers concludes that the highlighted points or factors impacts

better targeted project outcomes, speed and dramatically reduces construction projects works

repetition. Further segregating the discussed factors project machinery, staff, project design

including contract documents are applicable on any and each type of projects. Project location and

political situations, type of stakeholders including subcontractors and internal /external

communications to be handled considering the type of individual projects. Writing about

concluding statement each and every project is different so project teams need to discover micro

details about prioritizing the factors considering the specific situation.

40
5 Chapter 5

5.1 Case studies

Introduction

Each project has basic challenge to complete it according to project cost and schedule. But

unfortunately most of projects failed in timely completion and on Cost due to limit less project

complications.

I have been involved in construction projects from last 20 years. After thorough study of literature

review and getting of successful survey results I compared it with 3 case studies. I successfully

handled meetings with 5 project managers , 3 design directors , 2 resident engineer and presented

my dissertation and later discussed the real life project problems which we faced during 3 projects

execution . Later I tabulated each project rework issues and their solutions separately which are

closely linked to my literature.

5.1.1 Case study 1

Project discussed in case study 1 was an industrial building project in Abu Dhabi recently which

includes offices , workshops , substations .The project suffered with below discrepancies from

stakeholders , the owners , design consultant as well as builder for example ,

 Reworks due to discovering of additional underground services.

 Reworks due to material procurement issues.

 Rework due to design issues.

 Reworks due to market situation.

41
Due to above reworks project delay for 8 months. It was operational project due to the reason

client was in more lost.

Following table explains the actual reason for rework which caused project delay in schedule as

well went over budget.

5.1.2 REWORKS ON ABJ INDUSTRIES:

Week project management & design

issues
Consultant got design approval and works Subject reworks caused due to poor project
started at site. Going forward extra existing management and cost saving at tendering
services discovered during foundation stage. If detailed study would have been
digging stage. This project was under Dubai done then uncover able delay and subject
municipality. In result Building works rework sure can be avoided.
stopped and contractor reapplied for On the other side project director added that
approval to relocate the extra services. he has been working in gulf from last 32
Authorities usually take some time in years. Although it’s was project
awarding approvals. Team was successful in management fault but gaps between
getting approval after 3 months. This construction authorities and rest
rework added in project delay. stakeholders shall be reduced in order such
reworks effects to be minimized.
Carful tender document and feasibility
study
This project consists of industrial buildings, Client requirement proper study, careful
workshops and reinforced structural works. tender document and feasibility study can
The biggest steel structure was 400 meter in have added value to the works. All the
length and 120 meter in width. The below subject works like cancelling the earlier
details added which caused lot of rework orders and reprocurement works can be
from stakeholders. minimized. Client would have saved 20
percent of project cost.
 Building K heavy crane added.
 Building Q 8 workshop doors sizes
were revised.
 Additional beams were added due to
revised design in building A.
 2 cat ladders were added due to AC
unit’s miscalculations.
 Building dead load revised for block
L due to additional equipment load
and access tiling works.
 Portal frame and canopy added for
block A.
42
In appropriate hold on suppliers and
distributers.

Shortage on travertine marble faced on Companies shall select materials where it

project. Contractor completed 8 floors and has branch office or at least staff might visit
not started next due to shortage .Tiles were able to visit frequently for close
importing from France and there was coordination. Companies shall have 2 or 3
shipment issues. Owner was in hurry so tiles suppliers on the board so incase problem
design changed and rest balance quality may arise in case can be sorted out at early
remained on project till its completion and convenience.
later discorded.

Market configures the project status.

No one can predict the market which is Client must be having a competent team
universal truth. At initial project were which always has a deep eye on the market
having 15 building blocks. Owner while preceding such level of projects. By
constructed 7 blocks and stopped the work spending some of the dollars on market
due to economic recession. After 3 years’ professions client could have saved design
time owner started the rework by revising cost as well as redeployment of whole team.
parts of design and deeply new team.

Due to reworks the project closed by increased budget and over schedule. Project completed 8
months beyond completion date even implementing acceleration techniques. Contractor applied
for extension of time his time extension accepted but contractor was wishing to demobilize his
team to new project which delayed them as per their planned schedule.

5.1.3 Project KPIs

When we talk about planning although project mile stones and key performance indicators details

were tabulated for work packages. But 8 months additions due to discovery of additional services,

many variations of projects, tiles procurement issues over and above 15 blocks were designed

initially but unfortunately worked for only 7 blocks have disrupted all schedules. We can

understand how important it is to control the reworks on construction projects.

43
About resources management rework occurred was on critical path where additional services

were discovered. So in result manpower deployed on noncritical activities .It become hard to get a

required production due to more manpower. But when municipality awarded approval then

manpower become short and company deployed additional subcontractors to cope up the works.

The objectives of hiring the extra manpower in order to control the critical activities to beyond to

supercritical activities. The histogram helped in tracing the project on track.

The analysis with respect to project budget is to adopt a policy in order to accomplish the works

in a way to control the discrepancies impacts which have imbalance the project due to reasons

stated above.

Here affective action is required to reduce the impacts of reworks as project FIDIC clauses about

penalty and liquidated damages will affect badly instead to for option of minimum profit or even
44
without profit. Lastly project cost was affected and acceleration was implemented to cope up the

effects of reworks.

5.1.4 Nomination analysis & Results

The reworks causes on this case study are analyzed to see how they effected on project schedule,

resources, project cost and decision making. The cases are analyzed to understand how reworks

affects project progress .Decisions made by different stakeholders are judged and results

concluded that owner is the one responsible for success or failure of projects especially in terms of

reworks, although contractor part cannot be ignored at all especially when we talk about quality

matters.

8 months delays due to rework on design approval is occurred due to contractor fault. Many

variations (Reworks) on project were due to technical reasons and some were due to client

miscalculations and confusion. Tiles procurement rework was due to contractor failure about his

commitment with the supplier. Client paid design cost for 15 blocks and reworking the market

situation compiled to reduce to 7 blocks.

The reworks nominations are on client & contractor part which was tried to managed by project

acceleration as well as by implementing mitigation strategies as already discussed in project cost ,

project histogram and project schedule analysis.

45
5.2 Case study 2

The project was king Abdul Aziz International Airport project Jeddah. It is among the heavy

projects. It consists of 400 bridge decks, internal roads and infrastructure works. The project was

divided into 5 parts.

Bridges & Infrastructure Project

Less machinery and manpower erupt

rework.
Larger amount of storm water channels Contractor tried to reduce project cost by
works were involved on the project. During not deploying required machinery and
concrete pouring operations unskilled manpower. Experiences have proved that
manpower was less comparing to skilled each project have specific demand for
manpower. Over than that contractor used successful completion of project. During
loader bucket for pouring channel concrete submittal submission stage contractor must
instead of mobile chute.so concrete mixture be asked to deploy required machinery. Folk
faced bleeding concern over then poor of unskilled manpower is not at all
workmanship resulted big crack on the replacement of just numbered skilled
surface. The case become in management manpower.
eyes. Nonconformance issued by consultant
and works reputation noted at site.

Design engineers having week

educational background.

Huge concrete operations were required on Concrete design firm did not consider the
the project. Continuous concrete operations project severity and complexity .Bridge
46
were required on the project. Time arrived shape was complex with congested
in casting the first bridge deck, management reinforcement. Mockup shall be executed
faced honey combing and voids while open prior to start of works. The subject scenario
concrete shutter. Later discovered that problem would have noted earlier and
concrete workability was fine but having reworks and later project complications
problem in its setting time. Work stopped would have been minimized.
for 1 month. Issue become on board on the
other side many other decks were ready for
concreting. The rework been done on the
design again by the time 8 bridge slabs were
ready for concreting works.

None value added competition between

among project members.

Types of the bridges were 4, 5, 7 box girder Proper standard operating procedure and
bridges as well as bifurcated and trifurcated task risk assessment shall be done for each
bridges. Although team faced problems at of the activities. Different activities requires
start of project later Works went smooth different focus and attention of the project
when systematic. When bifurcated bridge .competition can be developed at hand on
deck work started project manager was activities will is really fine. But the tasks
wishing to complete the project with the which requires more deep study and
same pace. Measurement was taken and knowledge shall be segregated .on this
sends to workshop to cut and bend steel for subject fault if 1 week had been utilized for
the complicated diaphragm. The extra carefully then 1 month extra rework
reinforcement diameter was 25mm and 32 would have been avoided including steel
mm.50 Ton steel been used on single lose and further addition is loss of
diaphragm. When bended steel arrived at productivity and project extended beyond
site and started fixation works, its bending schedule.
was not proper. All steel wasted and rework
been done for cutting and bending works.
This all happened due to works urgency.
Due to this problem project delayed for 1
month.

Unplanned and speedy way of completion

Bridge bottom deck segregation

Bridges width varies from 3 webs to 11

webs. Bridge decks are collection of Removal of cans, plythene bags seems a
congested reinforcement. Bridge bottom minor task .yes it is when team concentrates
deck and webs take minimum of 2 months’ in removing them prior concrete works. but
work with heavy manpower resources.so at after concrete works it become really a
stage of concreting lot of dust and rubbish challenge and it took 1 month for single

47
gather beneath the reinforcement. Due to deck and just one can imaging about 400
urgency proper cleaning not been done. We decks. So not a single activity shall be
found loss of dust particles, cans, polythene overlooked .Project always found successful
bags stick to bottom deck after opening the only after looking into such minor cases.
shutter. Know about remedial works, we
either used mobile crane or erected
scaffolding for this additional work.

5.2.1 Work Breakdown structure

48
5.2.2 Project KPI’S.

Due to reworks on the project base line programme affected. Options for mitigating the delays

due to reworks were considered as well as partial acceleration strategies implemented.

Delays due to reworks were reduced by implementing mitigation shown above in planning

analysis. As the huge reinforcement works were ready for concreting but due to concrete redesign

issues it was a great danger for reinforcement rusting and again sand blasting additional activity

will have to be introduced in addition to weakling of reinforcement. It was really a serious

concern.In result of these reworks the project recovery strategy was influenced due to versatile

bifurcated decks which were requiring careful works and redesign concrete was an unrecoverable

rework on the project.

49
About resource management, all manpower was utilized on finalized and approved activities. At

start of project due to concrete design issues resources mobilized from the project .Going further

channels works were rejected, workers needed to remove the concrete and redo the job again

which utilized extra man-hours. Additionally reworks for versatile bifurcated decks and bottom

deck cracks repairs took extra man-hours which delayed the project by 6 months.

The project scenarios as discussed impacted the project cost badly. Removal of rejected works

added cost on the project .Redesign issue, versatile bridge deck and bottom deck repair added

additional cost on the project. The situation affected the project badly even some of the

subcontractors suffered for their payments from contractor end. Later case comes up in client

notice and subcontractors got their invoice cleared.

50
5.2.3 Nomination Analysis and Result,

Redesign of concrete was consultant fault but rejections of concrete channels, bifurcated deck

technicalities not considered at right time and bottom deck repair works were totally contractor

fault which later they completed project in lose. Project schedule and its cost increased due to

speedy completion. Project manager followed the complicated and straight forward activities with

same attention which has resulted project reworks. In similar way design study was not that deep

which resulted rework on project.

5.3 Case study 3

Roads and Infrastructure works Dubai.

This project consists of road bridges, foot bridges, 2 service tunnels and road works.

Communication & insufficient project

information.
Substation concreting works were in There was lake of communication between
progress under supervision of electrical MEP contractor and civil contractor. Right
company. While transformer trenches walls standard operating procedure and risk
been build. It was highlighted by electrical assessment shall be implemented. Electrical
manager that trenches sizes are not engineer shall visit the site frequently and
according to transformer requirement. In ensured proper implementation of drawings.
result reinforced concrete trances broken
again carefully in order to avoid cracking of
building foundations.

Procurement and late hiring of

contractor.
Procurement is amount the most important Earlier contractor involvement on the
deliverables on the project. Lots of types are project reduces lot of reworks. Contractor is
available for even in selection of single the one who has professional site execution
material. Deep professional knowledge is team available for work. They are the one
51
necessary for better selection of company knowing deep site problems at site.
and material type. Project specification was Contractor early involvement further
highlighting super silver glass to be fixed on strengthen the team. The design works can
all doors. While on site during contractor be thoroughly viewed important stakeholder
earlier project presentation owner changed on the project which will considerably
his mind to grey reflective tempered glass. reduce the rework on projects.
Supplier holed 10 percent deposited amount
and further rework on was required with
related stakeholders .project duration
extended 3 months further.
Slope protection in Saudi Arabia.
Design engineer having week educational
background
Shape of slope protection

Road length was 90 km it consisted of Proper contouring study not done on project
small, medium and some large sided slopes. and over than that project team was not
Designer provided same section for all experienced who may judge the design
slopes protection irrespective of length. It mistake. Experienced team shall be hired on
worked nicely for small and medium slopes projects. Always reworks on the project
but for large slopes all the side sand erupted harm the project schedule, cost.
and slope damaged during rainy seasons.
Later this protection was broken by project
team and reconstructed.

Cracks in tunnel

It was a service tunnel which was excavated Management team ignored the minor
20 meter deep. It was near to sea side leakage. As the concrete structure was not
.Bishop method was adopted for water hardened properly and new. Water seep
proofing works .sufficient pumps were not through the foundations into the walls.
provided for dewatering and always there Walls did not achieve it full compressive
found small amount of water gathered strength. Concrete normally achieved 75
around structure. Which resulted cracks in percent of strength in 28 days .Contractor
tunnel walls which were 70 cm thick .Later planned saved budget but in response
professional teams called for survey works reworks occurred. Cost saving helps the
to investigate the problem. Costly repair projects but careful and calculative risk
material was used which as well disrupted study to be done, likely scenarios need to be
the works progress .If contractor would calculated and properly implemented.
have adopted better quality assurance and
control procedures .Reworks would have
been avoided with cost saving.

Foundation excavation block B

52
Substation was adjacent to the big workshop Standard operating procedure and risk
which already existed. Excavation done for assessment not done. Contractor shall have
substation foundations but workshop studied the excavation method before start
foundation gets exposed and there become of work either to use a machine excavation
danger for building settlement .Later the or manual excavation. If contractor would
issue brought up in management notice. have rigged manual excavation instead of
Contractor was asked to refill all the area machine excavation then heaving structure
with concrete. So it was additional work for would have been protected. No reworks
contractor which erupted due to week occurred in result.
planning and improper communication.

ADNEC steel bridge.

There was foot bridge above tunnel to Although King Khalifa visit was successful.
access the marine side. Its tower was a But due to poor management reworks
concrete structure, but due to improper originated .Project completed delayed over
project management king Khalifa visit to then extra cost and quality suffered.
marine show was just a month ahead. It was
decided by director to replace the half of
concrete structure with steel structure .This
was only way to complete the project even
delaying 5 months .Due to subject reworks
material procured on site wasted and team
has to look for alternative to utilize the extra
material. On the other side steel structure
redesigned and steel material procured as
well as professional team hired to tackle
steel structure works.

5.3.1 Project KPI’s.

Delay noted on project schedule due to reworks of substation trances, change in glass type to

super silver step sol, redesigning of slope protections, cracks in the tunnels were repaired,

additional works around building foundation due to poor coordination and half of concrete

structure converted to steel structure . Base line programmer was revised taking into consideration

of above reworks as shown in fig. below.

53
Above graph shows the planning analysis how mitigation and acceleration techniques are

implemented. But the uncoverable rework delays were substation trenches breakage and its

reworks as well as redesign of slope protection.

5.3.2 Result.

After implementing the mitigation and acceleration strategies glass procurement, substation

foundation concern, service tunnel crakes reworks delay converted but substation trenches

breakdown and slope protection redesign was uncover able delay which resulted 5 month delay.

Regarding resources management, additional resources deployed on substation trenching works.

There were 3 substations on the project all were on critical path. Glass material procurement not

affected the manpower because subcontractor on the project having a good relations with the

company and he was already occupied on other projects as well. Redesigning of slope protection

also did not affected the manpower as manpower remained in the same group and work on box

culverts preparations work. Later team called back when design was approved. Regarding the

tunnel cracks many external parties visited and submitted their quotations. Lastly one selected

.some of activities remained stopped due to repair works. 800 man-hours additional added due to

reworks on substation foundations. On the other side foot bride concrete structure converted to

steel structure.

54
In conclusion, substation works and conversion of steel structure to concrete structure were critical

which added man-hours mainly and project delayed by 5 months in total.

Regarding cost analysis substations works added consider amount to project budget but contractor

bear the additional cost which affected his cash flow badly. Similarly some of slope protection

failure and its redesign added load on project budget. Minor addition cost occurred due to

discrepancies like Glass super silver step sole, 3rd party hiring for crack repairs and substation

foundation excavations. Client beard the cost of replacing the concrete structure to steel structure

in spite to quality worked suffered.

Contractor tried his best and negotiated with client about substations cost crisis, but client refused

to mitigate due to contractor miscoordination though they provided best rates for super silver

stepsil glass. On the other side contractor deducted 40 percent of the amount from subcontractor.

Huge quality lapse seen by converting half of concrete structure to steel structure.

5.3.3 Nomination Analysis and Results.

Substation foundation and substation trench reworks was totally contractor fault and he managed

all loses. Super silver step sol glass variation was from client. Slope protection redesign was

consultant failure who deeply not investigated the case. Service tunnel cracks appeared due to less

care to dewatering works which is also on contractor weak point. Client managed the variation of

converting half of concrete structure to steel structure.

Reworks done due to poor design of slope protection, cracks was repaired in tunnels, excavation

done near heavy foundation structure, part of foot bridge converted from concrete structure to

steel structure.

55
6 Chapter 6

Literature review survey comparison with case studies.

6.1 Introduction

In this chapter SPSS results and case studies results are compared. It finally concluded that

literature review hypothesis are totally applicable on 3 case studies and vice versa, both are

proving positive relation which and deeply explained below in addition to related literature review

highlights.

6.1.1 Week management vs. quality implementation (SPSS compression Vs. Case Study).

SPSS results about quality literature showed that application of quality audits , deploying

competent staff and recognizing award culture helps in controlling project weakness some are

foggy management instructions , works inspection rejection, On the other side case studies

concluded that reworks originated due to cost saving at underground utilities investigation in

case study 1 adding to that case study 2 showed reworks occurred due to concrete pouring on

bridge bottom deck slabs without paying attention to proper cleaning it from dust , rubbish

.although it seems a minor activity but just imaging that all scaffolding works erection for only

cleaning the soffit of bridge and repair works and re inspection from consultant and it approval

later dismantling of scaffolding .It all cost not only reworks but also delay the projects, wastage of

unnecessary resources in addition to project cost.

Hence SPSS result considered with real case studies.

56
6.1.2 Project document application Vs. Careful Review and restudy prior application

(SPSS compression Vs. Case study).

SPSS results concluded that by reviewing and studying the project deep study and its activities

break down according to severity originates better end results i.e. completion of project on time

and on schedule without avoiding its complications. In case study 2 whole reinforcement works

considered as a one unit but the critical areas separate not studied and managed separately. After

concrete poring and while opening the shutter it was discovered that concrete operation went

smooth in open areas while in complicated and congested part it showed poor result which caused

the reworks.

In the other activity in case study 2, there were 400 bridges out of them 30 bridges were

complicated due to their position and requirement. In start those 30 complicated bridges handled

in same manner as normally bridges which resulted lot of reworks, confusion among the team due

to the reason project suffered.

Similar case happened in case study 3 where on roads project there was 300 slope protection

works out of them 25 was having long lengths and difficult terrain. It was handled by easy go and

it all damaged and reworked due to heavy rain fall.

Hence spss survey results are considering with real case studies.

6.1.3 Reworks Mitigation global strategies Vs. Usual project management practices (SPSS

results vs. case studies).

SPSS concluded that application of highlighted mitigation strategies i.e. QA/QC procedures,

competent project team, owner demand and trust, restudy project cases and competent

communication dramatically reduces project reworks. Now taking about my case studies in order
57
to save the cost mobile chute was used instead of loader which resulted cracks in structure,

sufficient dewatering pumps not provided which resulted leakage which resulted reinforced wall

cracks and repair works involved, concrete foot bridge structure transferred half part to steel

beams and columns because project demand was to finish earliest due to prince visit which

resulted poor quality control and which never been happened in my experience. All the subject

discrepancies are result of not controlling the project reworks in proper way. Hence SPSS survey

result concludes in a similar pattern.

6.1.4 Controlled communication vs. project communications ((SPSS results vs. case

studies).

SPSS results concludes that better implementations of communications procedures are help full

for project smooth flight and reduces the project complications dramatically. In case study 1

marble issue was raised as the material was importing from France. Delivery for marble delayed

then again case was referred to design team. Matter was discussed with owner and later

procurements procedure followed .In result project design was affected and delivery reached on

project late by 4 month .so in result project schedule prolonged and extension of time given to

contractor on the other hand project cost increased lastly project operations delayed.similary in

case study 3 civil contractors casted concrete trenches which was not aligned with transformer

requirements. The core base of the problem was that electrical and civil contractor not

communicated properly. This case resulted breakdown of the reinforced concrete trenches walls

which is not at all an easy job.

Real case study suffered in same scenario as SPSS conclude according to professional survey

results.

58
6.1.5 Competent staff & skilled manpower vs. project resources (SPSS results vs. case

studies).

SPSS final result showed that competent staff and skilled manpower considerably reduces project

reworks. Additionally case study 1 results showed that many variations noted at project execution

stage which resulted project reworks and delays in it. Another issue on the same project was 15

building were designed whereas 7 blocks constructed .which caused additional design payment

and which was due to poor market studies. In case study 3 adjacent to heavy industrial structure

foundation excavations done for substation. Which have caused beam and column cracked over

the contractor was asked to poured concrete in the excavated area on their cost and they repaired

building cracks. Although permanent damaged happened on structure .this all happened due to

unprofessional project team and miscoordination.

Hence SPSS survey results and real case studies are aligned.

6.2 Discussion & Conclusion about Comparison (SPSS results & case studies)

6.2.1 Week Management vs. Quality Implementation.

Controlling the management issues teams must be having meetings to share vision to deliver the

successful project. A visionary team totally depend on manager capabilities .Then its manager

capabilities to rephrase vision into particle implementation which surely helpful in reducing the

projects reworks .It’s also recommendable to keep an eyes on team outputs and making them align

according to change in project requirements (Wellman, 2012).

Adding to above at initiation of project things use to be taken too easy and many important issues

mismanaged , this attitude not only drastic for project schedule but also affects team relationships

and lastly adds the reworks at middle or end stage of project (Wellman, 1995).
59
In maintaining the project quality on of the way is implementing the reward system which can be

accessed by the project managers to discover the best team member and appreciate them as much

as they can during month, biannually or annually ceremonies (Kowta and Chitale, 2012).

6.2.2 Project documents review & restudy

Companies must take a step for required trainings for team members who reasonably capable of

thinking forward and catch some of the discrepancies during restudy of projects. Such steps

increase the chances of project success.so in subject scenarios impacts the engineers decisions

either doing any risks studies or restudying the projects (Davison & Blackman, 2005).All these

practices results in innovative and well advanced project approach which develops interests in

team members and results in getting success in order to accomplish the project which results in

reducing the project reworks (Hoegl & Parboteeah, 2006).

Going further a recognition plan to be implemented which pushes the management to keep an eyes

on best decision makers /team members and later appreciate those selected team members to keep

up team members moral (Kowta and Chitale, 2012).

Project Dynamics & variations changes project balance:

(Hoegl & Parboteeah, 2006) states the necessity of reflex during project executions which is the

end result of versatile and innovative techniques and competent team. Able and best project staff

are responsible, vigilant, active and always keen to enhance the project progress by implementing

different strategies which are possible on project success.

During projects restudy members should be vigilant about project dynamics and make decisions

according to owner’s requirements. Project adjustments shall be done on priority basis according

to project dynamics.Duing reviewing or restudying on thing to consider is that project members

60
must be having freedom to flag the noted changes, give suggestions and finally team discusses the

end conclusions to put the results in place.

Especially construction projects having a versatile quality that many changes happen from day to

day which changes the project equilibrium and proportionally it induces the project reworks.”

Gestalt professional cycle is the best way of describing the ways based on the statement that any

new additional changes the equilibrium in project activities now it’s time for team member to

tackle the change and implement in best way on project which will bring construction project at

new level of equilibrium now this new position is better than the previous position (Zwikael &

Bar-Yoseph, 2004). In the same way things are getting revised and project finishes at its best

levels.

6.2.3 Reworks Mitigation global strategies Vs. Usual project management practices

In order to reduce the reworks teams must be having innovative capabilities .Although on projects

lot of manpower and resources and modern technologies are operating, best integration of all these

deliverables are important in order to generate required goes and objectives “If there would be

aligned, cohesive and unity among project staff target commitment and staff performance review

will ensure innovating thinking which results in reducing the project reworks (Locke et al, 1988).

6.2.4 Controlled communication vs. project communications

Usually many stakeholders are involved especially on construction projects so in result many

suggestions and talks are involved while completing the project deliverables. When team members

and stakeholders shares and implement their experiences and finally results use to be very positive

and sure would cause less chances of reworks (Koskinen, Pihlanto and Vanharanta, 2003).If a

team works and treated equally results project works accomplished by mutual sharing which

61
reduces chances of rework.so differences in the team to be minimize so team works at a tandem

for end fruitful results (Belbin, 2012).

6.2.5 Competent staff & skilled manpower vs. project resources

Projects are always versatile .Each project is having unique and different complicated steps. But

the general controlling techniques are similar about cost, schedule, manpower and getting trust

from different types of stakeholders and owners. Achieving project KPIs and milestones always

demand competent team which may go deeper to capture project requirements and successful in

understanding the cleavage plan of project.” Catching the project from bottle neck takes time,

competent project teams takes the shortest time to understand the easiest ways by controlling the

project challenges “(Wellman, 1995).

62
7 Chapter 7

7.1 Conclusion & Recommendation

7.1.1 Conclusion

Lot of literature is about reducing the construction reworks even then construction projects are

facing the over schedule and over cost completion. The main cause is that each project use to be

versatile in every way like its schedule and cost requirements, project locations and authorities

involved as well as project staff and project documents and many more. Now all these

complicated deliverables brings project cloudy pictures. My dissertation which has completed

after extensive study is another mile stone in current literature.

The projects reworks are due to poor project management, less manpower and non-maintained

construction machinery, area political background, contracts document complications, and

stakeholders and communication issues. Then reworks mitigation techniques studied and

highlighted in literature review which are helpful in reducing the project reworks. Later 5

hypothesis developed and were tested on SPSS which proved that all hypothesis support each

other. Test done were chromback alpha, correlation, regression, Normal p-p plot of regression

standardized residual and scatter plot.

Considering week project management resources, manpower, restudy, global dependent factors

are having correlation of .05 while design, communication, customers are having correlation of

.01. Full correlation details are highlighted in above table which concludes that project works

reputation can be dramatically control by carefully applying the mitigation strategies.

63
Regression analysis concludes project management improves project outcomes highest which is

27.9 percent by applying quality control, results reduces reworks. Improving project

communication increases project success by variance of 5.2 which results in reducing works

reputation. Refer above statistical analysis for more details.

Normal p-p plot of regression standardized residual conclude no abnormality as well as it’s linear

for all 5 hypothesis. Scatter plot results concluded that standardize residual is within range.

Clustering is absent which states that the selected sample is in align with homoscedasticity guess.

Later 3 project case studies discussed which highlighted project rework actual on ground. some

are existing services discovered at later stage , project variations , project procurement issues ,

market changing demand, project quality issues due to unskilled manpower , concrete quality

concerns, Issues due to deliverables different requirements , electrical and civil contractor

communications issues, delay involvement of stakeholders, design issues , poor quality of works

which causes tunnels cracks and many more.

To conclude comparison done between survey results and case studies , which proved that

overlooking of Regions situation , project resources , weak management issues, project design

issues , communication gaps , stakeholders discrepancies causes reworks which is crystal clear in

3 case studies as discussed and compared above. So SPSS results, case studies support each other

and vice versa.

7.1.2 Recommendation

Main contractor should hold major responsibility of project scope & its deep core requirements

and shall wisely adopt required strategy upon the acknowledged 6 reasons of reworks which
64
highlighted as stated above .The industry professionals must use the mitigation techniques stated

above for project successful completion. Researchers may further dig deep detailed study on

causes of reworks considering dissertation as a base root.

Due to my job responsibilities, my specific industry knowledge and time constraints this research

done mainly on civil infrastructure works. So it may be recommended to widen the research works

to other construction sectors.

7.2 Subjects that must focus in respect of UAE perspective

7.2.1 IDENTIFY REWORK RISKS

Any type of project weather it is heavy project or medium sized project rework sources must be

identified with vigilant studies. All this data will provide a base reference before starting of any

type of work. This might spread among related project team as a thumb rule before stating of any

project.

A factual SOP shall be studied and prepared for any type of unseen events which may occur at any

stage of project .The reworks that may occur identified must be tabulated on ranking basis. While

works execution such point shall be carefully kept in mind and reasonable amount of budget and

scope shall be allocated for any type danger that risk may occur.

Traditional way of calculating the danger of reworks and their further categorization shall be

improved in a way by preparing break down structures as projects team used to prepare WBS.

7.2.2 Risk calculations and their Sharing.

It is important to calculate project risk and share in detail with team members. Risk is stated as

any confusion that might impact the project in future. Risk may originate from bad project

decisions, schedule concerns, weak vision and could be developed due to high competition. On

65
construction project risks may be high, low and medium. The following format shall be kept in

mind for controlling the project reworks.

Rework risk factors frequency Probability impact mitigation

Each project has limited time high high High Keep eye on
period over than material and project
equipment bad quality are resources and
main sources of rework schedule.
Team building and huge high medium High Machinery
resources requirement are medium and
another cause of rework. histogram to
be monitored
closely.
Different stake holder’s high medium High All
requirement and interest medium stakeholders
generate a risk of rework. interest to be
built in.
Any requirement change from high medium High Contract
client or unavailability of medium document to
material causes rework. be prepared
after
thorough
study.
Project cash flow is also a medium low Medium KPI and cash
source of rework. low flow to be
carefully
monitored.
The contractor might be medium low Contractor
involved in many other shall be
projects and failed to bound
distribute required resources. strongly by
contract
terms.
Variation may trigger the low low Low low Project
rework changes shall
be planned
ahead

66
7.3 Innovative Teams helps in reducing reworks
Capable team members are core in reducing project reworks.

7.3.1 Efficient Team Members

Although companies are having best teams on board in order for its enhancing, the project

manager shall look into members having similar capabilities and output levels must be grouped

together. As well stepping team members considering their capabilities can help in identifying root

causes well advance by implementation which enhances the team performances. On the other side

deep involvement of project management team will help in dramatic increase in project progress.

The project staff will observes that their senior level engineers are concerned and deeply following

the deliverables in order to avoid reworks.

7.3.2 Reviewing plans enhances efficiencies and reduce reworks

Normally projects are having more than one construction managers. Construction manager works

at all levels on sites. Their suggestions and recommendation can really helpful in reducing project

reworks. This can be possible through monthly reviews. By updating the project strategies on day

to day basis concludes to groundbreaking results and innovative teams. Teams always delivers

best end result by implementing change management on the projects which results in reduced

reworks.

7.3.3 Positive Culture Among team Members reduces reworks

In order to reduce the project reworks it is important having weekly meeting on discussing new

ideas communicated by team members. These new ideas shall be tested and applied after deep

judgment which can improve project progress and reduces project reworks. High level Reports

shall be exchanged.
67
Its general practice that project cost and schedule reports forward to head offices and higher

management mergers it into their strategy .It is recommended that these reports shall be

distributed to project management .Where new ideas will be generated for both site management

and high level management .Such strategy reduces project reworks. Project managers can compare

project dynamics with company strategy for better results. It concludes that when head office team

and site management perform their duties as a tandem, team works like a business family, there

are no difference among various cultures and everyone feel valued in such culture teams perform

with devotions and interest which dramatically reduces projects reworks.

7.4 The following bullets are additionally recommended in reducing reworks in UAE projects,

 The government must introduce training programs by coordinating other industrial sectors

to enhance managerial techniques for professional engineers.

 Interim payments shall be cleared in timely manner which reduce project pressure

considerably results in reduction of rework.

 Reasonable project cost and balance project schedule is core in reducing project reworks.

 The government must continuously update its regulations and laws to reduce project time

& complications.

 It important to have a common and proper grip between engineers when listening and

understanding/interpretation customer ideas and suggestions .Proper implementation of

client’s ideas reduces reworks dramatically.

Above knowledge sure add value to civil engineering projects literature and wise reference for

researchers and students to deep dip the empirical counting to best control the project at its

68
deserving schedule and cost. The application of this dissertation will enhance industrial

professionals outputs by dramatically reducing the projects reworks. Reworks mitigation

techniques further reinforces the reduction of project reworks. Reworks on building projects

touched too less in this paper works as writer has less experience on the in building construction

industry especially high-rise towers. Which is sure a limitation of dissertation. The writer has total

20 years of experience out of which 15 years in UAE and 5 years in rest gulf .So this papers in

most applicable to Gulf especially UAE industry. Finally this paper sure having a capacity further

strengthen and reinforce by taking this paper works to further levels.

References:

Abdul-Rahman, H., Wang, C. and Yap, J.B.H. (2016), “Impacts of design changes on construction
project Performance: insights from a literature review”, Journal of Quantity Surveying &
Construction Business, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 31-54.

Abdul-Rahman, H. (1995). The cost of non-conformance during a highway project: a case study.
Construction Management and Economics, vol. 13(1), pp. 23-32.

Akintoye, A., Davis, P.T. and Holt, G. (2014), “Editorial”, Journal of Financial Management of
Property and Construction, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 2-3.

Alzahrani, J.I. and Emsley, M.W. (2013), “The impact of contractors’ attributes on construction
Project success: a post construction evaluation”, International Journal of Project Management,
Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 313-322.

Alaryan, A., Elbeltagi, E., Elshahat, A. and Dawood, M. (2014), “Causes and effects of change
orders on construction projects in Kuwait”, International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications, Vol. 4 No. 7, pp. 1-8.

Ansoff, H. I. (1990) ‘general management in turbulent environments’, practicing manager, 11(1):

6-27.

69
Atkinson, R. (1999). Project Management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a
phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International journal of Project
Management, 337-342.

Barber, P., Graves, A., Hall, M., Sheath, D. & Tomkins, C. (2000). Quality failure costs in civil
engineering projects. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 17(4/5), pp.
479-492.

Emuze, F., Smallwood, J. and Han, S. (2014), “Factors contributing to non-value adding activities
in South African construction”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 12 No. 2,
pp. 223-243.

Ahiaga-Dagbui, D.D. and Smith, S.D. (2014), “Rethinking construction cost overruns: cognition,
learning and estimation”, Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, Vol. 19
No. 1, pp. 38-54.

Akin O. (1986). Psychology and Architectural Design, Pion, London. Occurring in the project.

Belbin, R.M., (2012). Team roles at work. Routledge. PP. 540-545.

Burati Jr, J. L., Farrington, J. J., & Ledbetter, W. B. (1992). Causes of quality deviations in design
and construction. Journal of construction engineering and Management, vol. 118(1), pp. 34-49.

Enchase, A., Lisk, R., Sarahi, I. and Radwan, I. (2003), “Contributors to construction delays in
Palestine”, The Journal of American Institute of Constructors, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 45-53.

Construction industry”, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 19-
32.

Chan, D.W. and Kumaraswamy, M.M. (1997), “A comparative study of causes of time overruns
in Hong Kong construction projects”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 15 (1),
pp. 55-63.

Chan, D.W. (1998). Modelling construction durations for public housing projects in Hong Kong,
unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Hong, Hong Kong.

70
Cusack, D. (1992), “Implementation of ISO 9000 in construction”, ISO 9000 Forum Symposium,
November, Gold Coast, Australia.

Campanella, J. and Corcoran, F.J. (1983). Principles of Quality Cost, ASQC Quality Press,
Milwaukee.

Hornby, A.S. (2015), Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, Oxford
University Press, 9th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Davison, G. & Blackman, D., (2005). His role of mental models in innovative teams. European
Journal of Innovation Management, 8(4), pp. 409-423.

Dadzie, J., Abdul-Aziz, A.R. and Kwame, A. (2012), Performance of Consultants on Government
Projects in Ghana: Client and Contractor Perspectives, International Journal of B

Davis, K., Ledbetter, W. B., & Burati Jr, J. L. (1989). Measuring design and construction quality
costs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 115(3), pp. 385-400.usiness and
Social Research, Kumasi.

Dolor, H., Sawney, A., Lyer, K.C. and Rentala, S. (2012), “Analyzing factors affecting delays in
Indian construction projects”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp.
479-489.

Dalty, C.D. and Crawshaw, D.T. (1973). Working Drawings in Use, Building Research
Establishment, Current Paper CP 18/73, Watford, UK.

Elbashir, M., Collier, P. and Davern, M. (2008). Measuring the effects of business intelligence
systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance. International
Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(3), pp.135-153.

Ellsberg, M. and Heise, L. 2005, Researching violence against women, a practical guide for
researchers and activists, World health organization, Geneva.

Eriksson, P.E. (2015), “Partnering in engineering projects: four dimensions of supply chain
integration”, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 38-50.

71
Enshassi, A., Mohammed, S. and Abu Mosa, J. (2008), “Risk management in building projects:
Contractors’ perspective”, Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 29-44.

Fayek, A. R., Dissanayake, M., & Campero, O. (2003). Measuring and classifying construction
field rework: A pilot study. Research Rep. (May).

Faulkner, D. and Campbell, A. (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Business Strategy. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.

Goh, C.S. and Abdul-Rahman, H. (2013), “The identification and management of major risks in
the Malaysian.

Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. and Boeker, W. (1994) ‘the effect of board size and diversity on
strategic change’, strategic management journal, 15(3): 241-51.

Hwang, B.G. and Yang, S. (2014), “Rework and schedule performance: a profile of incidence,
impact, Causes and solutions”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 21
No. 2, pp. 190-205.

Hwang, B.G. and Low, L.K. (2012), “Construction project change management in Singapore:
Status, Importance and impact”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp.
817-826.

Ibbs, W. (2013), “Thinking about delay, disruption, and the cumulative impact of multiple
changes”, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, Vol.
5 No. 3, pp. 109-112.

Hwang, B.G., Zhao, X. and Ng, S.Y. (2013), “Identifying the critical factors affecting

Schedule performance of public housing projects”, Habitat International, Vol. 38,

pp. 214-221.

Hwang, B.G., Zhao, X. and Ng, S.Y. (2013), “Identifying the critical factors affecting schedule
Performance of public housing projects”, Habitat International, Vol. 38 (April), pp. 214-220.

72
Hwang, B.G. and Leong, L.P. (2013), “Comparison of schedule delay and causal factors between
Traditional and green construction projects”, Technological and Economic Development of
Economy, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 277-297.

Hegel, M. & Parboteeah, K. P., (2006). Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R & D
Management, 36(2), pp. 113-125.

Josephson, P. E., & Hammarlund, Y. (1999). The causes and costs of defects in construction: A
study of seven building projects. Automation in Construction, vol. 8(6), pp. 681-687.

Kakitahi, J.M., Landin, A. and Alinaitwe, H.M. (2013), “An exploratory study of rework causality
in Uganda”, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 266-
280.

Koskinen, K., Pihlanto, P. and Vanharanta, H. (2003). Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in
a project work context. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), pp.281-290.

Low, S.P. and Yeo, H.K.C. (1998). A construction quality costs quantifying system for the
building industy. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 15(3), pp.
329-49.

Love, P. E. D., Holt, G. D., Shen, L. Y., Li, H., & Irani, Z. (2002). Using systems dynamics to
better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International
Journal of Project Management, vol. 20(6), pp. 425-436.

Louis Klein, C. B. (2014). Improvisation in project management: A praxeology. International

Journal of Project Management, 267-277.

Love P.E.D., and Li H., (2000) Quantifying the causes and Costs of Rework in Construction.
Construction Management and Economics, vol. 18(4), 479-490.

Love, P.E.D., Wyatt, A.D., & Mohamed, S. 1997. Understanding rework in construction. In
Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Process Re-engineering, Gold Coast,
Australia, 14–15 July 1997. Edited by S. Mohamed. School of Engineering, Griffith University,
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. pp. 269–278.

73
Li, Y. and Taylor, T. (2014), “Modelling the impact of design rework on transportation
infrastructure Construction project performance”, Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, Vol. 140 No. 9.

Love, P.E.D. and Sing, C.P. (2013), “Determining the probability distribution of rework costs in
Construction and engineering projects”, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 9 No.
11,pp. 1136-1148.

Love, P.E.D., Teo, P., Carey, B., Sing, C. and Ackermann, F. (2015), “The symbiotic nature of
safety and quality in construction: incidents and rework non-conformances”, Safety Science, Vol.
79, pp. 55-62.

Locke, EA and GP Latham (1988). The determinants of goal commitment .Academy of

Management Review, 13(1), 23-40.

Oakland, J. and Sohal, A. (1996), Total Quality Management: Text with Cases, Butterworth
Heinemann, Melbourne.

O'Mara, C., Hyland, P. and Chapman, R. (1998). Performance measurement and strategic change.
Managing Service Quality, 8(3), pp.178-182.

Peggy simcic bronn and Carl Bronn: 31st July, 2002. Issues management as a basis for strategic
orientation.

Schaffer, R. (1992), ``Successful change programs begin with results'', Harvard Business Review,
January/February, pp. 80-90.

Shebob, A.N., Dawood, R.K. and Xu, S. (2012), “Comparative study of delay factors in Libyan
and theUK Construction industry”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,
Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 688-712, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09699981211277577

Stevenson, W. (2014). Operations Management. 12th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

Thomas, H.R. and Neapolitan, C. (1994), “The effects of changes on labor productivity: why and
how much?”, A Report for the Construction Industry Institute by The Pennsylvania State
University, University Park, Pennsylvania, Source Document 94.

74
Uttam, J.O. and Bhirud, A.N. (2015), “Review analysis on causes and effects of change orders on
Construction project”, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and
Communication, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 2230-2233.

Ye, G., Jin, Z., Xia, B. and Skitmore, M. (2014), “Analyzing causes for reworks in construction
projects in China”, Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 1-9.

Wanberg, J., Harper, C., Hallowell, M.R. and Rajendran, S. (2013), “Relationship between
construction safety and quality performance”, Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, Vol. 139 No. 10.

Walker, D.H.T. (1994), “An investigation into the factors that determine building construction
time performance”, unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Building and Construction
Economics, Faculty of Environmental Design and Construction, Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

Wellman, J., (2012). Eight habits of successful project teams. Employment Relations Today,
39(1), pp. 37-44.

Wellman, J., The British Group. (1995). The Standish group report-Chaos. Retrieved from
http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/docs/chaos-report.pdf.

Wickham, P. (2008). What do strategists mean when they talk about risk? Business Strategy
Series, 9(4), pp.201-210.

Woodward, J. F. (1997). Construction project management: Getting it right first time, Thomas
Telford, London

Zairi, M. (1996), Benchmarking for Best Practice ± Continuous Learning through Sustainable
Innovation, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

Zwikael, O. & Bar-Yoseph, B. A., (2004). Improving the capabilities of project team management
using the Gestalt cycle of experience. Team Performance Management: An International Journal,
10(7/8), pp. 137-144.

75
 Causes of Rework and their mitigation strategies.

Appendix 1

Questionnaire paper format for final dissertation research works

Reworks causes and their mitigation strategies

A. surveyor information

1. Position in the company

Higher Management Middle Management Engineers

2. Education Level
Masters and Higher level Graduate Degree College Degree

3. Your Country
UAE nationals Non UAE nationals

4. Basic Role:

Public Job Private Job Others

 Government  Client  Describe
 Semi government  Construction contractor
 Indirect employee  Consultant
 MEP contractor
 Advisor
 Project Management
 Material Supplier

5. Total Year of professional experience?

5 6-10 11-20 20 & above

6. Sex
Female Male

7. Age
25 to 35 35 to 45 45 to 55

76
 8. How long serving in the current originations
Less than 3 years Between 3 to 7 years Between 7 to 12 Years 12 years and Above

9. Maternal Status
Married Unmarried

Kindly mark the critical factors marking either 1 to 5 , in which 1 highlights the top critical
item , 2 highlights critical , 3 highlights helping factor , 4 states less critical and 5 represents
lowest critical items which originates works reputations.

Unprofessional project management causes modification on 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least
project
Non-scheduled and swift way of completion 1 2 3 4 5
Development of unwanted race erupts confusion in team 1 2 3 4 5
member
Unclear direction from management 1 2 3 4 5
Inspection failure from clients or consultants 1 2 3 4 5

Insufficient project resources causes rework 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least
Too tight project schedule causes of rework 1 2 3 4 5
Less experienced work force 1 2 3 4 5
Limited and unmaintained project equipment 1 2 3 4 5
Trying to reduce project budget from optimum 1 2 3 4 5

Country and global condition erupts rework 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least
Changes around the globe or region erupts the rework 1 2 3 4 5
Changes in country rules, instability in the region and 1 2 3 4 5
natural disaster may cause the rework.
Changes requested by client especially at end stage of 1 2 3 4 5
project.
Project stakeholders and their different influence on 1 2 3 4 5
project.

77
Poor project design is causes of rework 1st Cause 2 cause OK Less Least
Poor project specification. 1 2 3 4 5
Poor review and control over project documents during 1 2 3 4 5
project operations.
Staff week education background. 1 2 3 4 5
Impracticable project schedule. 1 2 3 4 5
Technicalities involved on project. 1 2 3 4 5

Material procurements on project may causes the rework 1st Cause 2 cause OK Less Least
Stakeholder’s different vision and working style. 1 2 3 4 5
Stakeholder’s different level of commitments. 1 2 3 4 5
Complex procuring ways. 1 2 3 4 5
Understanding new stakeholders 1 2 3 4 5
Manufacturing faults in materials. 1 2 3 4 5

Communications 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least

Week communication channels [corridor, fax, email etc.] 1 2 3 4 5
Missing information from suppliers 1 2 3 4 5
Delay in reply from stake holder 1 2 3 4 5
Delay in involvement t of suppliers and contractors 1 2 3 4 5

Construction works reputation are reduced by applying the below described

factors which are well.

Implementation of quality assurance procedures 1st cause 2 cause OK less Least

Performing quality audits at different layers 1 2 3 4 5
Deploying competent project team 1 2 3 4 5
Targeting specific interim goals 1 2 3 4 5
Award system implementation. 1 2 3 4 5

Staff and Manpower 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least

Deploying competent project team and implementation of 1 2 3 4 5
best practice
Providing better offers / increments to project staff 1 2 3 4 5
Sufficient staff and skilled manpower 1 2 3 4 5

78
 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least
Customer demand to be properly fulfilled by
Global Market variations and accordingly implementing 1 2 3 4 5
best strategies at spots.
Contractor involvement at early project stage. 1 2 3 4 5
End user demand to be noted carefully and executed 1 2 3 4 5
accordingly.

Restudy Contract documents. 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least

Restudy project documents to avoid mistakes . 1 2 3 4 5
Spare more time for project requirements listing. 1 2 3 4 5
Careful stakeholder’s selections. 1 2 3 4 5
Restudying project milestones developed. 1 2 3 4 5
Variations to be discovered at project early stage. 1 2 3 4 5

Better communication methods 1st cause 2 cause OK Less Least

Well informed teams and open communication 1 2 3 4 5
Well informed teams and open communication 1 2 3 4 5
Gain client believe prior to initiate the project. 1 2 3 4 5

Appendix 2

Project owner is the one who either gains major profit from the project or either the ultimate loser

because he has to live and handle the end outcome. Below is the client importance article on

projects whose best strategy may reduce the construction reworks and enhance project success.

If construction organization needs to be successful its system shall be exposed system that

welcome suggestions about manpower, procurement, cost, machinery as well as detailed

information about client demands, client principles and laws which collectively feed to the best

project completion (Pilcher, 1992). The client most of time less professional with complications of

project, but sure every owner feel upset while project cost exceeded, their best interest is to limit

the budget as much as possible (McNulty, 1982). But major decisions also done by client as well.

79
Therefore following are major things which owner should take care for In order to reduce the

project reworks and ensure it on time and schedule completion,

 Clearly investigate their purpose and scope.

 Convey clearly about their purpose, objective and scope.

 Rightly calculate the project cost.

 Best selection of stakeholders (Project management, consultant, contractor ECT.)

 Understand and make core project decisions

 Thinking about best coordination between stakeholders.

 Guiding the stakeholder team as a leader.

 Finalize methods to calculate budget, invoices for stakeholders, project schedule.

80