Coursework 2 Roberto Peralta
Coursework 2 Roberto Peralta
construction company
BSV11700 Strategic Management (CW2)
Module Leader: Dr Linda Khaddour
By Roberto Peralta, 40672664
(Peralta, 2023)
Identifying a distinct competitive advantage for HC&S is not clear from the publicly available
information. For a small construction company capable of executing high quality jobs, relying on
generating value for carefully selected clients and providing flexibility and innovation in project
delivery methods can provide a possible competitive advantage.
PESTEL Analysis
A PESTEL analysis is a tool used in strategic planning to analyze the external factors that can
influence a company or sector. The acronym stands for “Political, Environmental, Social,
Technological, Economic and Legal” factors influencing an organization. HC&S is an established
player in a relatively small construction market of a small town in northwestern England. Some
of the factors influencing the company will be more localized like the decisions and regulations
of the local government. Other powerful factors will operate on national and global scales.
Table 2. PESTEL analysis factors affecting H Cumberbirch & Son Limited
SWOT Analysis
Analyzing a company to understand its strategic planning and learning from it usually focusses
on the company’s internal strengths and weaknesses and the external threats and opportunities
at hand: a SWOT analysis (Boddy, 2019). For HC&S taking stock of their current circumstances in
a pivotal moment in its history is an important step in the formulation of a corporate strategy.
Strategic thinking is characterized by reflection and looking ahead in the future to visualize
challenges and opportunities.
Table 3. H Cumberbirch & Son Limited SWOT Analysis
Strengths Threats
- Storied company history that dates - Inflation
back more than 120 years points to - High interest rates
long term resilience. - Economic slowdown
- Experienced team (leadership, - Competition that implements modern
operational management and methods of construction
specialist labor force), - Disruption of supply chains
Weaknesses Opportunities
- Traditional values and work methods - Digitalization
fail to provide the efficiency of - Advent of AI technologies to improve
modern methods of construction productivity.
production. - New modelling technologies for
- Not taking a holistic approach to constructability and BIM management
construction management that analyses
focusses on creating value for every
stakeholder in the chain of value. This
is reflected in their latest safety
challenges.
(Peralta, 2023)
Fundamentals of strategy
HC&S is general contractor that has operated since its founding in the year 1900. Throughout
the decades it has maintained a dedication to quality and the development of client
relationships. To have that long trajectory a company must have inherent values that guide it
through societal and economic times of upheaval. The lack of a formal enunciation of a
corporate strategy, missions, objectives, and values to be found in the company’s website or
publicly available documentation is significant in and of itself. It denotes that there is not a
public commitment by leadership to a corporate strategy and that perhaps that self-reflection
has not taken place.
However, from the company´s characteristics and publicly available information a set of
company values and tendencies can be inferred. The company describes itself as “a family
business combining traditional values, the very best quality and unrivalled customer service”.
While on the one hand these are noble, classic, and worthwhile company values. On the other
hand, there is not one mention of modern methods of construction or lean principles in the
company’s public documentation.
Lean production was developed since the 1940s by the Toyota Motor Company. Lean
production strives towards an ever-improving efficiency in their production and environmental
impact. The principles and practices condensed by lean theory have been applied to various
other industries and manufacturing sectors after making its impact in Toyota and the wider
automotive industry. This theory has been applied to the construction business with
encouraging results since the 1990s (Koskela, 1992) but has also been met with resistance by
entrenched habits in the industry. The challenges originating in the product design process in
the construction industry, the waste generated by the traditional tendering process, and a zero-
sum view adversarial stance between the stakeholders hold the construction industry back
(Sarhan et al., 2017).
Furthermore, and particularly relevant to the case at hand, the principles of modern
manufacturing and lean methodology strive towards a systematic and holistic approach to the
production of each deliverable. Following this logic, human resources, and the study of the
complex human interactions necessary for the success of a construction project have taken a
preponderance in modern construction management. Turning to the core principles of lean
construction as a “respect and relationship-oriented holistic project design and delivery
process” (Bhawani et al, 2021), one can find the underlying lesson of the importance of human
resources theory and safety.
An incomplete view of lean methodology would be to look to optimize processes without
considering the human elements that interact with the process along the way. A properly
applied lean methodology will look to create happier and healthier more efficient workers. A
rested, concentrated worker will produce better production and safety results than an
overworked stressed one. Indeed, some authors list waste of human potential as one of the
areas where lean methodology must strive to be more effective (for example Koskela, 2004).
There are obstacles to applying these lessons. As Koulikoff-Souviron and Harrison (2007) state,
human resources and operations management are routinely analyzed separately. This is folly, as
a successful HR strategy can provide a competitive advantage over competitors. As HC&S´s
failure to plan appropriately plan for the safety of its workers in the 2019 incident shows, a
“making do” approach to the process design of any construction activity can exacerbate waste
and maximize negative externalities like injuries.
One cornerstone of lean methodology is to include crew and team members in decision making
and planning. Innovations like the Last Planner System seek to gain value and information from
experience tradesmen and subject matter experts that can better craft a decision or a solution
for the project’s planning than a strictly top-down implementation. This principle can very well
be applied to the process design and risk assessment of a construction activity, specially in
activities with high-risk conditions like heights, fire, explosives, drowning, underground and
confined spaces.
Mission
A mission statement provides a company with a clear overarching objective that should
fundamentally influence strategic decisions taken by the leadership team. In the case of HC&S,
the following mission statement intends to build upon their traditional family values, quality
assurance and “client first” orientation.
We create maximum value for our clients while reducing waste and
negative consequences for all. Since 1900 our family company has helped
our community grow, our mission is to continue doing so with a
fundamental commitment to lean production, quality, safety and the
environment.
While placing the client in the forefront, the first sentence is also a clear nod to lean production
methods. Every client understands that creating value is the main desired outcome of
contracting with HC&S. It also signals to the clients and all stakeholders that HC&S are good
stewards of their resources with a focus on reducing waste. Instead of the word “externality”
which for the public at large can feel like a euphemism, the word “consequence” is used. Clients
understand that their projects can have negative consequences on neighbors, on traffic, on
waterways, etc., and are interested in minimizing these whenever possible if only for public
relations reasons.
In the second sentence HC&S long history is mentioned to remind coworkers and clients of the
tradition and experience the company has and should be known for. Lean principles are then
explicitly mentioned in the mission statement. As concluded from the Five Forces analysis
above, HC&S’s competitive advantage could be found in being an experienced and established
small-sized general contractor but at the same time leveraging the productivity and nimbleness
lean methods provide, which are necessary to compete in a today’s construction market and
current economic conditions.
Moreover, three central corollaries of lean methodology are enumerated: quality, safety, and
care for the environment. Quality assurance is one of the traditional values at HC&S, with lean
methods it can be standardized and tailored to avoid waste and generate value for the client.
Safety is then clarified to be one of the central objectives of the company. This is a correction
from past corporate strategy (at least as one can gleam from the company’s official website).
The 2019 incident can be understood as stemming from safety being a blind spot in the
company’s process. Part of managing a reputational crisis is recognizing past mistakes and
showing corrections are made.
Lastly, damage to the environment is also a possible negative externality of the construction
industry. And, positively, new ways of building are a necessary element of a healthier
relationship of human societies to the environment. More practically, as seen in the PESTEL
analysis, the legal factors are trending in the direction of more stringent regulations for safety
and environmental hazards.
Conclusion
Times of crisis are opportunities for a company to rethink itself. More than just a PR stunt to
deal with the reputational fallout of this case, defining a corporate strategy is an exercise in self-
reflection about the guiding principles and objectives for an institution. This process of
formulating and analyzing corporate strategy will allow all stakeholders to benefit and learn
from the errors that brought about the crisis.
The proposed fundamental of strategy proposed above are appliable to other companies that
face similar struggles to implement lean methodologies and modern methods of construction
production and their logical consequence of the primacy of safeguarding the well-being of
construction workers.
The corporate objectives proposed with their accompanying KPIs provide measurable outcomes
for the strategy envisioned. Rather than let a good crisis go to waste, HC&S will surely renew
itself and learn from this unfortunate and dangerous event.
References
- Abdelhamid, T. S. & Salem, S. (2005). Lean Construction: A New Paradigm for Managing
Construction. International Workshop on Innovations in Materials and Design of Civil
Infrastructure. Cairo, Egypt.
- Balfour Beatty (2022). Building New Futures: Annual Report and Accounts 2022.
- Bhawani, S., Messner, J., and Leicht, R. (2021) Key Planning Steps Enabling Systematic Lean
Implementation on Construction Projects. Lean Construction Journal 2021.
- Dentons (2022) The Building Safety Act is now in force. Available at:
https://www.dentons.com/en/insights/articles/2022/may/5/the-building-safety-act-is-now-
in-force (Accessed 24 July 2023).
- Forbes, L. H. and Ahmed, S. M. (2011). Modern Construction: Lean Project Delivery and
Integrated Practices, 2011.
- H Cumberbirch & Son Limited (2012) About Cumberbirch Construction. Available at:
https://www.cumberbirch.com/about-cumberbirch-construction/ (Accessed 24 July 2023).
- H Cumberbirch & Son Limited (2021) H Cumberbirch & Son Limited Unaudited Financial
Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2021.
- Health and Safety Executive (2019) Details for Case No. 4696864. Available at:
https://resources.hse.gov.uk/convictions-history/case/case_details.asp?SF=CN&SV=4696864
(Accessed 24 July 2023).
- Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the new production philosophy to construction. Center for
Integrated Facility Engineering (CIFE), Stanford, CA, 2010.
- Koskela, L. (2004) ‘Making-do-- The Eighth Category of Waste’, Proceedings for the IGLC-12,
Elsinore.
- Ministry Of Housing, Communities & Local Government (2021) Outline Transition Plan for the
Building Safety Bill. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/building-
safety-bill-transition-plan/outline-transition-plan-for-the-building-safety-bill#why-is-the-
building-safety-bill-needed-and-what-will-it-do (Accessed 24 July 2023).
- Sarhan, S., Pasquire, C., and King, A. (2017) The concept of Institutional Waste within the
Construction industry: A potential theoretical framework. Lean Construction Journal 2017 pp
12-24.
- Porter, M.E. (1979). How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57,
137-145.
- Porter, M.E. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces that Shape Strategy. Harvard Business
Review. January 2008.
- The Construction Index (2022) £36k fine for height safety failings. Available at:
https://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/36k-fine-for-height-safety-failings
(Accessed 24 July 2023).