PLAGIARISM SCAN REPORT

Words 997 Date August 15,2020

Characters 6127 Exclude Url

0% 100% 0 46
Plagiarized
Plagiarism Unique Sentences Unique Sentences

Content Checked For Plagiarism

Vikas Govalkar, et. al. (2014) performed a study on the bare frame and compares it with the infilled frame having a
different position of the shear wall. The plan geometry of the building is rectangular having planned of 15m x 9m. The
structure is G+ 9 storeys tall with 4 m of ground floor height and 3m of all other floors height. Analyses of seismic forces
has been performed as per Indian code IS 1893 (part-1) 2002 for each model using STADD Pro V8i. Wind load calculation
is done as per IS 875. To acknowledge the effect of shear wall in the bare frame and infilled frame, for that total 8 models
are developed. Kiran Kamath et al., (2015) studied the behaviour of concentric steel braced frame structure using
pushover analysis. In their work, a 2- bay 2D steel frame structure with 1-bay X braced frame, 2-bays X braced frame and
structure without bracing with different aspect ratios have been modelled and analyzed using software ETABS. Linear
static and pushover analysis is done on the entire prototype for seismic loads defined as per IS 1893-2002 (Part-I) using
ETABS. The pushover analysis provides a vast idea into the structural aspects, which controls the performance of structure
during earthquakes. Prof. Prakash Sangave, et. al. (2015) presented their study based on a comparison between the three-
dimensional models of steel & RCC structure which are analyzed by using the seismic analysis equivalent static load
method provided in IS 1893: (2002) with the help of software ETABS. They also done designing and cost estimation which
is carried out using MS-Excel programming for all structures. They did analysis on a typical plan of building of RCC and
steel structure having plan dimensions 22.5m X 12m with G+6 and G+10 storey height. They analyzed the seismic forces in
zone V with hard soil condition having importance factor 1. Ghalimath A.G. et. al. (2015) applied a static analysis
procedure over the exiting design of an RC bare frame and frame with infill and dual system. In order to evaluate the
performances of their models, the static analysis for seismic analysis of the existing structure is performed. After
performing the analysis they acknowledge the parameters like natural period, base shear, displacement, axial force and
bending moments in column required. They concluded that an infill plays a major role in the seismic evaluation of RC
buildings. It is being observed that by placing shear wall, axial force & bending moment in column get decreases.
MohdAtifet. al. (2015) researched on comparison of earthquake analysis of G+15 building provided with bracings and
shear wall. The building is analyzed in all the seismic zones define as IS 1893-2002. The analyzed structure is of same in
geometry in along length and width and is ofG+15 storey, Ordinary RC moment-resting frame (OMRF). The structure is
modelled in tool STAAD.pro V8i software. Time period of the structure in both the direction is retrieving as per IS
1893(part 1):2002 Seismic analysis has undergone. The Lateral seismic forces over the RC frame are carried out using a
linear equivalent static method as per IS 1893(part 1): 2002 for different earthquake zones. The objective of present study
is to understand that the structure needs to have suitable an Earthquake resisting features to safely resist large seismic
forces that are generated on them during an Earthquake. Shear walls are quite efficient in terms of cost construction and
in reducing distortion due to earthquake in structure. It is also been observed that the braced frames can dissipate a
great degree of energy exerted by the earthquake. The performance results and the analysis of the prototype are then
graphically shown and also the data in tabular form and then it is used for comparison for determining the best
performance of structure against the seismic forces. Dharanya et.al. (2017) worked on the topic comparison study of
shear wall and bracings under seismic loading in a multi- storey residential building in which they analyzed a G+4Soft
storey structure which consists of cross-bracing and shear wall, the plan area of a structure are 381 m2, the building
have 3m of each storey height. The analysis of structure Modelled are
done using analysis tool Etabs, considering dead, live and seismic loads as per Indian Standards and conducted equivalent
static load method the study done for the seismic zone V only. Janakkumar M. Mehta et.al.,(2017) presented a comparative
study on tall structures of (G+17) storey building was analyzed with different shear-wall configuration. They modelled to
examine the effect of seismic parameters like base shear, lateral displacements, lateral drifts and model time period on
the
structure for the zone-V in medium soil as specified in IS:1893-2002. The plan is for the building is 25m x 25m with a total
of 18 storeys having typical storey height of 3.5m. They provided the shear wall at a different location on the structure
and compared them. Nikhil Sahu, Anubhav Rai (2017)their study is based on a Comparative study of three different cases
of framed structures of Bare frame structure, Open ground storey frame structure and structure with infill walls in the
alternate storey are considered for comparison of different parameters like Spectral Acceleration with time, Spectral
Displacement with time, Spectral Acceleration with Spectral Displacement (Capacity Curve). The graphs of each results
have been plotted and have been compared. The results have been found to be quiet interesting for the frame open
ground story to give better results than the other two. Sumitsharma, et. al., (2018) studied the effect of seismic forces on
the structure using different software. In their study, the base shear, time period and storey displacement is evaluated by
using the tool STAAD and Etabs software and they compared results which obtained are compared with IS1893 and they
have done the analysis on the building having plan areas 20mx20m and the height of each storey is 3m situated in zone
IV. The analysis is done by considering the factor of medium soil and using SMRF type building.

Sources Similarity