Csia PWC Climate Change Survey
Csia PWC Climate Change Survey
Foreword 2
Introduction 3
Respondent profile 19
Contacts 24
About the survey
In the third quarter of 2020, CSIA and PwC
conducted a survey to investigate how organisations
are addressing climate change from a governance
perspective, and particularly its impact on the role of
the Corporate Secretary. CSIA member bodies were
requested to distribute an electronic survey to their
member company representatives. The electronic
survey was distributed to CSIA members in 14 countries
as well as additional jurisdictions via social media
promotions.
Objectives
The key objectives of the survey were to gain insights into:
• the measures regulatory authorities have taken to manage and respond to climate
change risks
• the extent to which entities have adopted regulatory guidance/principles on
climate change and embedded them into their corporate culture
• the allocation of responsibilities (including delegations) within the entity with
regards to climate change
• the role of the Corporate Secretary (or other equivalent position) in influencing
corporate governance practices that address climate change
• the current overall awareness of climate change and maturity of the organisation
• the current knowledge, skills and expertise of both the Corporate Secretary
(or other equivalent position) and the Board specifically relating to climate change
• current training received by both the Corporate Secretary (or other equivalent
position) and the Board on the topic of climate change and related matters (i.e.
climate change risks and opportunities, emerging trends and issues) as well as
identifying training needs
• the extent to which climate change is reported on, the frequency of internal and
external reporting and the extent to which related disclosures on climate change
are made
• the risk management process and the extent to which climate change risks are
identified, responded to, mitigated and monitored.
Foreword
and more shareholders The survey findings suggest that As one of the most prominent
and stakeholders there are many opportunities
for knowledge sharing between
global issues, climate change poses
climate-related risks to the viability
expect effective climate jurisdictions, organisations and of an organisation and a threat to the
individual governance professionals in environment we live in.
action and governance this field. Learning by experience is a
from their companies. great asset that can be shared in many As conduits to Boards and companies,
ways across brands and member proactive response by Corporate
Boards will therefore require material associations. Secretaries, both as individuals and
information to inform their decision corporately, to cushion the impact
and policymaking. As the custodian More than half (55%) of respondents of climate change is certainly an
of corporate governance in an believe their organisation has shown obligation to mother nature.
organisation, one of the critical roles promise and has positive future plans
of the Corporate Secretary is to to drive climate change risks and With this, CSIA hopes that Corporate
educate the Board on developments in opportunities. Priorities vary across all Secretaries will not only ensure
governance and advise on the impact jurisdictions especially in the areas of adequate reporting on a company’s
on the Board strategy. pollution, sustainable usage of natural climate change governance, but
resources, accountability for waste also be able to influence and play a
Corporate Secretaries International disposal and consistent education of more significant and tactical role in
Association Limited (CSIA) and human resources. guiding the Board to consider risks
PwC collaborated on a project to and opportunities relating to climate
determine the role of the Corporate Organisations with specific target change.
Secretary in driving climate change in areas for implementing climate
organisations. This survey report will change initiatives were represented
present an overview of the regulatory by less than half of respondents.
environments in different jurisdictions It is clear that those who do not Karyn Southgate
and the extent to which organisations believe their organisations have done CSIA Immediate Past President
have adopted the regulations, the role sufficient work, or given thought to
of the Corporate Secretary in guiding driving climate change risks and
corporate governance practices that opportunities, could benchmark with
address climate change and future those that have.
plans to drive climate change risks and
opportunities.
1
“These Are the Top Risks Facing the World
in 2020,” World Economic Forum, taccessed
15 February 2021, https://www.weforum.org/
agenda/2020/01/top-global-risks-report-climate-
change-cyberattacks-economic-political/.
| 3
The governance
of climate change
It is becoming It therefore cannot be ignored that climate change is a governance issue.
There is growing pressure on Boards to exercise their duty of care by ensuring
increasingly evident that that they are informed on the impact of climate change on the organisation
climate change drives and have integrated climate governance into their strategic and oversight
responsibilities.
risks and opportunities
In the context of governance, the survey investigated the organisation’s
and that business awareness and structure to manage the risk of climate change, including the role
decisions have become of the Board and the Corporate Secretary, and their capacity to fulfil these roles.
inextricably linked This section examines respondents’ awareness regarding the implementation
with effective climate of climate change initiatives in their organisations, the responsibility for driving
climate change and the extent to which it has been embedded in the governance
governance. structures of their organisations.
2
“The Global Risks Report 2020,” World Economic Forum, accessed 15 February 2021, https://www.weforum.
org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020
| 5
Accountability and responsibility
Climate change has often been The survey considered the main roles driving climate change initiatives within
viewed as being separate from the organisations.
Board’s strategic responsibilities and
not considered to be part of directors’ Figure 2: Responsibility for leading climate change initiatives
duties . As global pressure around
Q: Who within your organisation is charged with initiatives relating to climate
climate change action increases,
change (who drives climate change initiatives) (mark all applicable)?
it has become imperative for Boards
to integrate climate change into their Company/Corporate Secretary/
strategic and oversight responsibilities. 19%
Governance Professional
An increasing number of shareholders Board Chairperson 17%
and stakeholders expect effective
climate action and governance from Chief Executive Officer 14%
companies and organisations. Risk Manager/Chief Risk Officer 10%
Compliance Officer 8%
ESG Manager 7%
Nobody 1%
While organisations may have varying views about who the drivers of the climate
change agenda are or ought to be, it is clear that accountability ultimately
resides at governance level in most organisations. The roles of the Board and
the Corporate Secretary were further investigated in this regard.
The vast majority (71%) of the respondents indicated that the Board’s
responsibility statement and Board charter include climate change risks,
which certainly reinforces the belief that accountability rests with the Board.
For the 29% of respondents who indicated that responsibility statements were
not formalised, the most prevalent constraint mentioned was that Boards were
unsure of how to incorporate risks and opportunities, suggesting a possible lack
of material information and absence of accountability frameworks.
In general, most respondents indicated that the Board should drive climate
change initiatives and embed it in their organisations through policymaking and
strategic planning.
Ultimately, failure to find the most effective way of integrating climate change into
governance may reflect negatively on the Board’s duty to exercise ‘reasonable
diligence’ as there is widespread information available about climate change and
the risks it poses to organisations.
The Corporate Secretary has an important role to play to ensure that Boards
have access to the material information they require to inform their decision-
making and policymaking.
| 7
The role of the
Corporate Secretary
As the custodian of corporate
governance in the organisation, one
of the critical roles of the Corporate
If a Corporate Secretary is involved in major
Secretary is to educate the Board decision-making with respect to business
on developments in governance
and advise on their impact on expansion and investment proposals, they
Board strategy, including risks and
opportunities relating to climate
can always contribute to responsible decision-
change. In the words of one of the making that is informed by detailed analysis
survey participants:
of proposals and expansion programmes that
align with the culture, vision and mission of
the organisation. As Corporate Secretaries,
we are all aware of the SDG3 and the MDG4
goals as adopted by the United Nations, and
as responsible professionals, we can advise the
Board to match up their business objectives
with a greater vision for the world. This not
only ensures higher ESG contribution to the
country, but makes organisations stand out as
role models for others throughout the world.
The role of Corporate Secretaries needs to be
strengthened further to give them the power
to be heard, otherwise they merely remain
compliance professionals.”
— Survey participant
3
Sustainable Development Goals
4
Millennium Development Goals
Important 21%
Somewhat Important 7%
Least important 7%
Advisory 31%
No role 21%
Compliance 12%
Execution 5%
Driving role 4%
Policymaking 4%
Strategy 3%
| 9
Interestingly, the survey found that only 15% of Corporate Secretary
Reasons why respondents regard their role as being strategic, driving initiatives or policy
Corporate direction or ensuring that climate change is on the Board’s agenda, despite their
role in guiding the Board in considering risks and opportunities. This suggests
Secretaries play that Corporate Secretaries have an opportunity to assist Boards to define their
no role in climate organisational climate change strategy and identify the opportunities as well as
to set climate change apart from other areas of the risk agenda.
change
The survey further investigated how much reliance organisations place on
Corporate Secretaries attributed Corporate Secretaries to provide the Board with the appropriate direction,
this to a number of reasons, guidance and awareness to ensure that it can effectively discharge its duties
including: relating to climate change and related risks and opportunities. The general
perception is that Boards do rely on Corporate Secretaries for direction and
• the Corporate Secretary being guidance in such matters, as shown in figure 5.
underutilised and mainly
regarded as a scribe Figure 6: Reliance on Corporate Secretary
• difficulty in leading such Q: How much reliance is placed on you to provide your Board with the
initiatives when the Corporate appropriate direction, guidance and awareness in respect of its duties and
Secretary is not of sufficiently responsibilities around climate change and related risks and opportunities to
high rank in the organisation ensure that the Board can effectively discharge its duties relating to climate
• a lack of awareness and change.
acknowledgement of climate
33%
change as a Board-level
31%
issue and the role Corporate
Secretaries can play in driving
the climate change agenda
• the Corporate Secretary having a
limited platform to say anything 21%
about climate change, especially
in midsize and family-owned
enterprises 14%
• the Corporate Secretary not
having access to the Board
• working for a partnership in
which the partners set the
agenda and make all the
decisions. 1%
More than half of participants (54%) confirmed that the Board was ‘reliant’
or ‘very reliant’ on Corporate Secretaries for direction and guidance on this
matter. For the respondents who said there was no, or minimal, reliance on the
Corporate Secretary, the reasons for this were (in order of frequency):
• Climate change issues are not part of the Corporate Secretary’s role/portfolio.
• Climate change is not yet an area of focus for the Board.
• The organisation has inadequate internal resources.
The results clearly indicate that, in instances where the Board is aware of the
impact of climate change and engaged in addressing it, reliance is placed on
the Corporate Secretary for guidance. The importance of the role is further
reinforced by the Corporate Secretary responses captured in Fig 4. In guiding
the Board, however, the Corporate Secretary needs to ensure that they have the
knowledge and understanding to educate the Board on climate change issues.
• watching documentaries.
The most common actions taken to raise awareness of climate change include
conducting workshops, distributing newsletters and conducting surveys. Other
mechanisms used mainly include the writing of memos for the Board and internal
communication with staff.
While there are many sources of information available that deals with the impact
of climate change and the results seem to indicate that a concerted effort is
being taken to raise awareness on climate change, it is concerning that there
is a gap in knowledge regarding how to effectively integrate the risks and
opportunities into organisations’ strategic plans. There is an opportunity for
expanding training and continuing professional development programmes for
Corporate Secretaries to address this need.
| 11
Governance structures
Considering the risks and Figure 8: Climate change as a separate and prioritised agenda item
opportunities presented to
Q: Is climate change a separate and prioritised agenda item at Board and/or
organisations as a result of climate
management committee meetings? If ‘yes’, has climate considerations been
change, the survey investigated
integrated into (an) existing committee(s) or addressed by a dedicated
the governance structures that
specific climate/sustainability committee?
organisations have in place to address
these.
No
Despite the vast majority of
respondents indicating that their
Boards’ responsibility statement Yes
and Board charter include climate
change risks (see Figure 3: Inclusion of
climate change risks in responsibility 36%
statement and Board charter), the 64%
survey results suggest that Boards’
current level of focus on climate
change issues is insufficient.
The majority (64%) of respondents indicated that climate change issues are
not prioritised as a separate agenda item on Board or management committee
agendas, while 17% also confirmed that there were no formal process in place to
communicate climate change risks.
Of the 36% of the respondents who confirmed that their Boards and
management teams have included climate change as a standing agenda item,
nearly half have a committee dedicated to climate change issues, while the
rest have integrated climate change and sustainability issues into other existing
governance structures, most notably their risk, audit, governance, or social and
ethics committees.
Overall, these findings suggest that despite the growing concern and importance
of climate change issues affecting organisations, many could do more to
improve their governance concerning this matter.
5
“The Paris Agreement,” United Nations Climate
Change, accessed 18 March 2021, https://
unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-
agreement/the-paris-agreement
| 13
Reporting
In crafting ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development’, the United Nations put forward 17 Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs).6 These goals are complex; and so is business, which leaves
many wondering where to start. At the same time, pressure to respond will only
increase – pressure from customers, buyers, and governments of the countries
in which organisations operate. Reporting, both internal and external, will receive
heightened scrutiny as stakeholders expect relevant information regarding
climate change.
12% Annually
2% Monthly
17% Quarterly
4% Half yearly
Yes Never
More than half (55%) of respondents confirmed that opportunities, risks and
climate-driven events impacting on their business are formally reported on, and
most report on these once or more times per year.
A small number of respondents (10%) indicated that they do not report on such
issues consistently and, instead, do so when requested by the Board or Board
committee, or when a particular issue or event arises.
Of the respondents that do formally report on these matters, less than a third
indicated that they follow recognised, voluntary climate change reporting
frameworks, such as the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), Paris Agreement, or
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD).
6
“Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” United Nations, 2015. Accessed
22 February 2021. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication
Plans to drive climate change cover a range of focus areas, which are presented
in Figure 11.
Figure 11: Focus areas for driving climate change risks and opportunities
Q: What are the company’s plans to drive climate change within the company
over the next 12 months?
Green campus/offices 4%
Improving livelihoods 4%
Reducing e-waste 2%
| 15
A reduction in carbon emissions is the Figure 12: Main strategies for driving climate change risks and opportunities in
most common focus area, which may the upcoming 12 months
be attributable to the fact that a large
percentage of survey participants are
Specific environmental target areas 47%
operating in India (39%) and China
(19%), where carbon emissions are a
national priority. Not aware of plans/no plans confirmed 14%
Nearly half of the respondents (47%) indicated that their organisations are driving
climate change risks and opportunities within a specific environmental target
area, such as carbon emissions.
| 17
Conclusion
Boards and management teams The survey findings suggest that We would like to thank the CSIA
are being called on to understand there are many opportunities members and all survey participants
climate-related megatrends and their for knowledge sharing between who assisted in the formation of this
impact on the organisation, as well jurisdictions, organisations and body of knowledge. A special thank
as the organisation’s impact on these individual governance professionals you is extended to Mr Rudolf Essel
trends. Commitment to acting on in this field. for contributing their insights and
climate change and moving towards analytical skills to the report.
sustainability, setting targets to Learning by experience is a great
reduce emissions, and becoming asset that can be shared in many We wish you all the best in driving
carbon-neutral within a defined time ways across brands and member and implementing the initiatives
frame should be priorities for those associations. The Corporate that will embed climate change
charged with governance. What is too Secretaries International Association in the corporate culture of the
often missing from the conversation Limited (CSIA) believes that the organisation – may it be a valuable
is that in order to ensure sustainability learnings articulated in this paper process for you, your Board and
and accountability, these processes will assist Corporate Secretaries your organisation.
need to be formalised. and governance professionals in
this mammoth task.
Reporting can be viewed as a tool
to drive behaviour change, and
incorporating aspects relating to
climate change into strategy as
opposed to merely including it in
reporting processes, is a positive step
towards ensuring sufficient attention
at the governance level to drive actual
implementation.
Company/Corporate Secretary/
Governance Professional 50%
Other 20%
Finance Accountant 6%
5%
Legal Counsel
Compliance Officer 5%
Executive Director 3%
Board Chairman 1%
Non-Executive Director 1%
Sustainability Manager 1%
Respondents came from 21 countries, of which China, India, Nigeria and South
Africa had the highest level of participation.
India
17%
China
Nigeria
11% 39%
South Africa
Other
14%
19%
| 19
Other participating countries
Australia Germany Peru
Eswatini Singapore
When considering the types of organisations that were represented, large private
organisations, small private companies and listed companies accounted for
nearly 70% of participants.
12% Other
Non-profit organisation
State-owned enterprise
24%
22% Family-owned business
The respondents covered more than 30 different industries, of which the top
seven, as shown in Figure 16, accounted for 50% of respondents.
Number of companies
longer-term climatic region’s altered seasonal monsoons Key to reaching this goal is decoupling
destroying communities, and 2020
shifts. being one of the years with the highest
economic growth from carbon
emissions and resource use. To
temperatures recorded in modern achieve this, more than 120 countries,
times. 450 cities and 300 companies have
made net-zero commitments — with
Emissions in the atmosphere are long- dates ranging from 2030 to 2050
lived, so today we are living with the and the commitments covering
impacts of activities of generations approximately 25% of global carbon
past and our children will live with the emissions.
impact of our emissions today.
Net zero, as defined by The Science-
Over the last decade, carbon Based Target initiative (SBTi), is
emissions have increased by 1.5%
per annum, whilst it should have been
a time to avoid the worst impacts, a state in which the activities
and carbon emissions were meant within the value chain of a
to be decreasing. Scientists have company result in no net
demonstrated to ‘most’ governments
that man-made climate change is real
impact on the climate from
and we have since seen commitments, greenhouse gas emissions.
statements of intent, or pledges, to This is achieved by reducing
tackle climate change being made by
value chain greenhouse gas
the public and private sector alike.
emissions, in line with 1.5°C
But the ‘decade of action’ has arrived pathways and by balancing
and we need to act now to ensure that the impact of any remaining
there are fundamental step changes
by 2030 to avoid the worst and most greenhouse gas emissions
irreversible impacts of climate change. with an appropriate amount
Failure to act will fundamentally of carbon removals.
change the way the planet operates
and the way we live — extreme heat,
drought, rising seas, flooding and fires
will impact food security, urbanisation,
migration, poverty and health.
| 21
The SBTi definition of net zero is fast Additionally, 155 companies (with a sectors expected to soon see the
becoming part of a business’ licence combined market capitalisation of same pressure. This is resulting in
to operate, rather than a ‘nice to have’. over $2.4tn and more than five million the phenomenon of ‘stranded assets’
employees) have signed a statement as these resources no longer have a
In the meantime, governments and urging governments around the world buyer and hence no value. This will
cities across the world are increasing to align their COVID-19 economic aid potentially impact the going concern
commitments and regulation around and recovery efforts with the latest status of such entities.
carbon, energy and pollution to climate science. Canada has gone as
encourage companies and individuals far as to make reporting climate risks a The EU is imposing stringent reporting
to act. requirement for companies wishing to requirements on companies operating
receive COVID-19 bailout funds. in the region, which will manifest itself
Among the two biggest global in supply chain requirements. The EU
emitters, US President Joe Biden A coalition of more than 70 pension is also looking to tax imports based on
signalled the US’s intention to rejoin funds and investment managers their carbon footprints.
the Paris Agreement on his first day representing assets of $16tn have
in office, while China has ambitious designed a ‘net zero’ framework to Sustainability can no longer be
commitments around emissions cut emissions from their portfolios by managed in isolation, nor can
reduction and giving incentives for 2050. This is one example of providers organisations focus only on mitigating
renewables making it the largest of capital increasingly moving away negative impacts on society and the
investor in renewable energy. from supporting companies or planet.
Meanwhile, New Zealand is the first industries that are not transitioning.
country to make climate risk reporting Instead, climate and sustainability are
mandatory for companies in line with Already, consumers and trading increasingly being built into the core
the Task Force on Climate-related partners may choose to not buy of organisations, reflected in purposes
Financial Disclosures (TCFD). from a company due to the carbon and missions, managed across
intensity of its products. The energy operations and recognised as crucial
sector, particularly coal and oil, is to engagement with investors and
specifically being targeted with other policymakers alike.
Affiliate members
The Chartered Governance Institute (CGI)
9 6
https://csiaorg.com/
100,000 14+
governance professionals country members
100 5
participating countries continents
| 23
Contacts
PwC CSIA
Jayshila Mistri Ashish Garg
Partner, Governance Leader President
PwC South Africa [email protected]
[email protected]
Zahra Cassim
Jayne Mammatt CEO
Partner, Sustainability Leader [email protected]
PwC South Africa
[email protected]