Scribd
Upload
55 views2 pages

GROUP 5 PRISMA (Final)

This document presents a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram that outlines the process for identifying studies via databases, registers, and other methods for inclusion in a new systematic review. It shows the screening and eligibility assessment process, including reasons for excluding full-text reports. A total of 487 records were initially identified from databases and registers, with 24 passing the screening and 22 assessed for eligibility, resulting in 13 studies being included in the review.

Uploaded by

Queen Rosie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
55 views2 pages

GROUP 5 PRISMA (Final)

This document presents a PRISMA 2020 flow diagram that outlines the process for identifying studies via databases, registers, and other methods for inclusion in a new systematic review. It shows the screening and eligibility assessment process, including reasons for excluding full-text reports. A total of 487 records were initially identified from databases and registers, with 24 passing the screening and 22 assessed for eligibility, resulting in 13 studies being included in the review.

Uploaded by

Queen Rosie
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases, registers and other

sources

Identification of studies via databases and registers Identification of studies via other methods

Identification Records removed before


Records identified from*: screening:
Records removed for
Core.ac.uk (n=214) irrelevance to the research Records identified from:
ProQuest (n = 268) topic by reading the title (n = Citation searching (n = 41)
PubMed (n = 5) 463) etc.

TOTAL= 487 Core.ac.uk (n=211)


ProQuest (n = 250)
PubMed (n = 2)

Screening
Records screened
(n = 24 )
Records excluded due to
duplication
(n = 2 )

Reports sought for retrieval Reports not retrieved


(n = 41 ) (n = 0)

Reports excluded due to


Reports assessed for eligibility mismatched/inappropriate to the
(n = 22 ) eligibility criteria:
Participants (n = 1 ) Reports assessed for eligibility
Method (n = 11) (n = 41)
Focus (n= 4 ) Reports excluded:
CASP Score[8 below] (0) Reason 1 FOCUS (n = 5)
Reason 2 METHOD (n = 27)
Reason 3 PARTICIPANTS (n = 2)

Included
Studies included in review
(n = 13)

*Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers).
**If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools.
From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases, registers and other sources

You might also like