HR Technology
HR Technology
HR Technology
Planning Imperatives
for 2023 and Beyond
HR Technology Planning Imperatives for 2023
and Beyond
Overview
Key Findings
■ Forty-four percent of survey participants stated that driving better business
outcomes (revenue growth and profitability) was the No. 1 strategic priority for HR
technology transformation over the next three years.
■ According to survey participants, the three most important HR technologies for the
coming year are: skills management, learning experience platforms and internal
talent marketplaces.
■ The three HR domains on which HR technology leaders plan to focus most in the
coming year are: reporting and analytics, recruiting (i.e., talent acquisition), and core
HR or HR information systems.
■ Only 15% of survey participants say their HR technology landscapes will include any
on-premises applications by 2025.
■ Target technology investment on those that provide clearly defined and measurable
business value to help the organization weather worsening economic conditions.
The mantra for successful HR technology leaders in 2023 and beyond is “achieve
strong business outcomes and improve HR’s effectiveness and efficiency to
navigate through times of economic uncertainty and talent scarcity.”
■ Allocate at least 10% of the HR technology budget for innovation to spur skills
development and internal mobility and improve the learning experience.
■ Keep pace with peers by investing the bulk of the HR technology budget in reporting,
recruitment and core HR technology.
■ By 2030, 95% of global midsize and large enterprises will have fully migrated to
cloud and have no remaining on-premises HR applications. Only organizations with
exceptional requirements (e.g., military, government) will retain any on-premises HR
applications.
Survey Objective
The 2022 Gartner HR Technologies Client Survey sought to understand organizations’
priorities concerning HR technology. Consequently, the results of this survey will benefit
HR technology leaders as a guide to what peers are doing and thinking as we head into
2023. This research includes results and analysis concerning HR technology strategy,
user experience, and HR and IT collaboration.
With a faltering global economy, HR technology leaders must anticipate greater levels of
accountability and greater demand for measurable outcomes to justify new investments
and their wider technology strategies. The top three priorities identified by HR leaders for
their HR technology transformation strategies are: better business outcomes (such as
revenue growth and profitability), growth in headcount and skills, and cost optimization
(see Figure 1).
■ For mature organizations that already have most of their HR applications on the
cloud, cost optimization is possible through consolidation of vendors (typically with
an HCM suite vendor). However, some compromise will be needed in terms of
functionality.
■ For organizations yet to move the majority of their HR applications to the cloud,
reducing operating cost will be impossible without severe sacrifices.
Organizations should not move to the cloud primarily to find cost savings; such efforts
rarely succeed. While cloud deployments do help organizations avoid the large capital
expenditure (capex) purchases associated with on-premises deployments, they usually
come with significantly higher operating costs, which eliminate any proposed cost
savings. Our research also indicates that a similar (if not greater) number of full-time
equivalents (FTEs) is needed to manage cloud applications compared to on-premises
applications.
■ Reduced need for manual intervention (for example, data duplication and transfer)
Without adoption, technology is a dead weight, providing zero value while incurring
ongoing costs. Moreover, employees who reject an HR technology spend time finding
workarounds, which leads to work friction and inefficiency (see Designing Work to
Unlock a Responsive Culture).
HR technology leaders should therefore actively drive adoption of the technologies they
introduce. This requires the application of end-user feedback to improve the technology
incrementally, change management and stakeholders’ digital maturity. HR technology
leaders must also focus on using data to improve the related resources and the process
flows of the most frequently used technologies.
Anecdotally, the first cohort — organizations that expect more than three additional
applications from third parties — tend to be larger, complex and global. This cohort may
have transitioned from an on-premises and/or fragmented state, during which they
accumulated substantial experience with cloud talent point solutions. Because of this
history combined with their inherent complexity, this cohort’s expectations for talent
management module features and functions are greater than those of organizations with
a fully consolidated core cloud HCM suite. The first cohort will have deployed an HCM
suite for core HR, headquarters-country payroll and the most suitable talent modules
(typically, performance and goals, career development and succession planning).
However, other payroll localizations, analytics and workforce planning deployments will
be still in process. Learning, talent acquisition and advanced capabilities — such as
predictive analytics and talent marketplaces — will be often deployed outside the suite.
It’s important to remember the continued management and attention cloud applications
require to deliver ongoing value to the organization. Most cloud applications get two to
four major updates per year, with smaller patches happening in between. These updates
are included in the SaaS fee; however, by default, most are delivered but initially turned
off. (After one or two future cycles, updates are forcibly turned on.) It is up to HR
technology leaders and their system administrators to communicate updates in a clear
and timely fashion so their organizations can benefit from new capabilities as they arrive.
Additionally, the organization’s requirements may change over time, a “set it and forget it”
mentality can be extremely harmful and must be avoided. HR technology leaders may find
their investments have become an expensive technological debt if they are unable to keep
up with changing requirements. This risk reinforces the importance of regular updates to
the HR technology strategy (at least annually) to ensure HR technology delivers the
greatest possible value for the organization.
Talent analytics initiatives can be expensive. To get the largest returns on their technology
stack upgrades and drive better business outcomes, HR technology leaders need to
identify and prioritize key metrics that underpin their organizations’ goals. (See
Benchmark the Top Metrics Talent Analytics Teams Report to Business Leaders for
examples of such metrics.)
It is also critical to have a strong core HR platform, which was the third most selected
domain in our survey. Organizations must maintain and enhance their core HR platforms
to meet changing business requirements and drive efficiencies.
For more information on the distinction between investments in applications that deliver
innovation and investments in existing applications and systems of record, see Use Pace
Layers to Align Your Application Strategy With Your Business Strategy.
Although 43% of survey respondents indicated their employees would be satisfied with the
HR technology operated by their organizations, the rest believed their employees would
feel either neutral or unsatisfied (see Figure 7). This is not a high satisfaction rate
considering the time, human effort and cost put into purchasing and implementing these
technologies. (This correlates with end-user adoption being identified as a top three hurdle
in Section 2 of this research.)
4. Excluding employee, manager and other non-HR-user input from the technology
selection process
5. Attempting to fit a custom and complex process into a product designed for simpler
needs rather than drastically streamlining the process to fit the product (preferred) or
deploying a product that can accommodate the existing process
HR and IT Collaboration
8. The State of Collaboration for HR Technology Investments
Thirty-nine percent of surveyed HR technology leaders indicated they tend to lead in
setting their own HR technology strategies, with support from IT. Another 45% indicated
shared leadership (see Figure 8).
These data points confirm that leveraging IT expertise and support is necessary. Although
many HR organizations try to fully own HR technology strategy planning, the HR team
alone is not likely to have all the skills and knowledge needed to define a holistic,
comprehensive HR technology strategy. HR, the functional domain expert, has the
necessary HR and business process insights, and it aims to improve functional efficiency
and employee experience. IT has technological expertise and can validate that the HR
technology strategy is feasible and actionable at scale. Due to their different areas of
expertise, HR and IT must be mindful of their respective roles in each task (e.g.,
integration challenges) and tailor their expectations, responsibilities and deliverables
accordingly.
HR technology leaders clearly indicate that central IT has become less involved in HR-
technology-related activities, such as building a business case or setting HR technology
requirements, when HR and HRIT reside in the same function. Organizations that have
formed a dedicated HRIT team within HR actively put a mechanism in place to improve
the partnership between HR and IT over time. As this team setup helps break operating
silos and foster and retain HR technology expertise within HR, central IT no longer needs
to be fully involved in every step of HR digital transformation and management. Central IT
is therefore more responsible for support, logistics, integration and assessment activities
instead of more cutting-edge decision making about technology use and innovation (see
Figure 9) (see Note 1).
For HR technology employees seated in IT, our 2022 HR Technology Leader Survey
indicated that system integration, managing releases for cloud applications, and
assessing strategic roadmaps and updates were the three most important roles and
responsibilities. 1
Endnotes
1
2021 Gartner HR Technology Leaders Survey: This survey included responses from HR
executives at more than 40 organizations across different countries, industries and sizes.
Countries: U.S. (56%), Albania (3%), Australia (6%), Canada (9%), India (3%), Kuwait (3%),
Netherlands (3%), Norway (3%), Saudi Arabia (3%), South Africa (3%), Switzerland (3%),
U.K. (3%). Industries: construction (3%), consumer goods (3%), education (6%), financial
services (13%), food, beverage and tobacco (3%), government (3%), insurance (3%),
manufacturing, materials and heavy industry (16%), media, news and entertainment (3%),
nonprofit/nongovernmental organization (3%), oil & gas, mining and forestry (3%),
pharmaceuticals (6%), professional services (3%), real estate (6%), technology (19%),
other (6%). Median number of full time employees: 6,500
Page 18 of 18
Connect With Us
Get actionable, objective insight to deliver on your mission-critical
priorities. Our expert guidance and tools enable faster, smarter
decisions and stronger performance. Contact us to become a client:
Become a Client
© 2023 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. CM_GBS_2154067