1st Aem.00758-22
1st Aem.00758-22
1st Aem.00758-22
Central Queensland University, Institute for Future Farming Systems, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
a
P oultry production has an enormous contribution to global economics. Over the years,
the exponential increase in chicken consumption resulted in an upsurge in Australian
chicken meat production, from 3 million in 1950 to 1951 to around 653 million in 2016 to
2017 (1). The industry is facing challenges in controlling the health and welfare of chickens
for optimum and cost-effective production. The increase of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) Editor Johanna Björkroth, University of Helsinki
in humans and livestock adversely affects public health. Consumers are seeking high-quality Copyright © 2022 American Society for
meat or egg produced humanely under antibiotic-free production systems. The industry Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Address correspondence to Dragana Stanley,
strives to keep up with rapidly changing consumer demands by investing in modern and
[email protected].
highly automated production systems and research to achieve high-quality products while The authors declare no conflict of interest.
providing animal welfare and quality nutrition to ensure resilience to disease. In many coun- Received 3 May 2022
tries, the layer industry does not use antibiotics as growth promoters; however, antibiotics Accepted 17 August 2022
can be used to treat sick birds, but often eggs produced by antibiotic-treated birds must be
excluded from production. This is pushing the egg industry to depend more on alternatives
to antibiotic products.
Alternative antibiotic products are actively studied and developed to reduce the use of
antibiotics in the livestock industry. The trend is leaning toward organic sources to decrease
possible adverse effects. The alternatives to antibiotics include enzymes, bacteriocins, antimi-
crobial peptides, organic acids, probiotics, prebiotics, natural antimicrobial products (bentonite,
zeolite, charcoal, and biochar), and essential oils and their active antimicrobial phytochemicals
such as carvacrol, thymol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, eucalyptol, and others (2–6). This
brought a range of products onto the animal-food market, with phytogenic products currently
dominating.
The phytogenic products can be used alone or with other additives such as prebiotics,
probiotics, or organic acids. Well-established ability to control pathogens and enhance the
performance in chickens (3, 5, 7–12) have brought phytogenic products into the spotlight.
Several studies have reported a reduction in devastating pathogens such as the species of
Clostridium (13), Escherichia (14), and Salmonella (15). Numerous studies have examined
adding the phytogens as a supplement into feeds and showed improvements in critical
production parameters such as quality of eggs and feed conversion ratio in layers (16, 17)
and enhancement of performance in the broilers (18–21). Further studies have observed
significant interactions between phytogens with levels of cholesterol (16, 22, 23), gut-brain
axes (Bajagai et al. 2021b), sex hormones (4, 23) and immune systems (21, 24).
Despite the abundance of information on the benefits of phytogenic products, running
free-range production systems remains a significant challenge for the poultry industry,
which still struggles with disease outbreaks and high mortality. An immense number of
phytogenic products are available on the market, and understanding how these products
perform in different production setups, feed formulations, pathogens, and disease control
spectrum is essential for choosing the best product to address the different issues each
farm is facing. The phytogen used in this experiment is a mixture of essential oils, bitter sub-
stances, spices, and saponins. The effects of this product have been examined to investigate
the health, performance, egg quality and intestinal microbiota composition, and changes in
microbiota functional capability under a free-range system at the time of the year corre-
sponding to the highest heat stress and disease outbreak peak.
FIG 1 Cumulative mortality, average egg mass, cumulative hen housed eggs, and average intake (GBD = Grams per Bird per Day) during
the phytogen administration period. The onset and outbreak of the Spotty Liver Disease are outlined in the shaded rectangle.
torques group, Murdochiella, Olsenella, Prevotellaceae UCG001, and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut
group were widely distributed in both control and treatment flocks.
Effect of phytogenic products on bacterial abundance. From the 20 identified genera
obtained from the flocks, nine genera (Eubacterium hallii group, Desulfovibrio, Rikenellaceae
FIG 2 The number of dirty eggs in phytogen-supplemented birds is shown as a % difference from the
control. Negative values are presenting % lower than control, and positive values indicate % higher than in
control for that week. The graph shows that after removing phytogen supplementation at 40 weeks of age,
these benefits were quickly lost.
FIG 4 Heatmap generated using the pheatmap R package. Data were transformed into mean scaled log2 with the abundance
in the range shown in the scale bar blue (low) to red (high). Significant genera shown on the heatmap were selected using
DeSeq2 analysis (P , 0.05).
they display significant (RDA P = 0.007) difference in the functional profiles between the
two groups shown in Fig. 6.
Histological and SCFA analysis. Both histological analyses of the ileum and SCFA
analysis of the cecum contents were within the expected range and did not show a signifi-
cant difference (Wilcoxon test; P , 0.05) between the control and phytogen supplemented
birds in any of the measured parameters.
DISCUSSION
Performance data demonstrated clear benefits of phytogen application in a large-scale
FIG 5 LEfSe (left) and RDA (right) plot comparing the chicken cloacal samples of the flocks fed with a control diet (Ctr) and
groups supplemented with phytogenic treatment (Phy). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score was scaled into log10, and
SILVA taxonomy was compared to allocate the specific genera.
including the disease outbreak period. Similarly, performance parameters, including the
cumulative hen-housed eggs, and weight and number of individual eggs produced, were
better in the phytogen supplemented flocks, demonstrating the improvements in the over-
all health and performance. This is of high significance for the layer industry, where the
push for free range resulted in reemerging of Spotty Liver Disease because of the pathogen
Campylobacter hepaticus, which is readily found in the free-range soil, insects, and native
free-range animals such as rodents and wild birds (25). Reducing mortality is often not the
top priority for the industry, but it is gaining more power with the rise of consumer interest
in animal welfare issues. Dirty eggs are an indicator of diarrhea and intestinal issues in birds.
Although these performance improvements may look small when given per bird, multiply-
ing this by 20,000 birds in each group, the benefit of improved egg production accumulated
to approximately 5,800 additional kg of eggs, or 8,333 additional cartons of dozen eggs,
compared to control throughout the product administration.
Based on the above taxonomy results, the 16S amplicon data appears to be inconclusive;
there is no desired reduction of pathogens and boost of beneficial species that would explain
the performance benefits. However, after years of intensive poultry microbiota research, we
now know that such scenarios are highly unlikely. Our data indicate that microbiota change
affected fewer taxa, and that instead of targeting specific pathogens (taxa), the product is likely
targeting the specific pathogenic and fitness functions across all bacteria, thus generating
minor taxa abundance-based alterations but affecting overall community functional abil-
ities. Indeed, our shotgun sequencing of cecal metagenomes shows that a range of essential
vitamin, energy, and amino acid production functions were decimated across all taxonomy
in supplemented birds. The metagenomic analysis showed a significant functional shift in
the overall community (P = 0,007).
Heme biosynthesis pathway is an essential pathway for oxidative metabolism strongly
reduced by phytogen supplementation. It functions as a regulatory molecule in protein sta-
bility, protein targeting, transcription, translation, and cellular differentiation (26). In humans,
defects in this pathway can cause a metabolic disease known as porphyrias which express
neurologic and photocutaneous symptoms (27). In bacteria, heme is an essential molecule to
the function of hemoprotein. During the infection, bacterial pathogens must acquire heme to
generate energy and detoxify immune effector cells from the host (28), which makes heme a
vital element for bacterial pathogenicity.
The tricarboxylic acid (TCA), one of the most investigated pathways, also reduced by phy-
togen, produces precursors for biosynthesis and is a ubiquitous pathway in almost all aerobic
living organisms (29). It creates energy and the reducing power in the mitochondria, strongly
influencing overall metabolism. TCA cycle metabolites regulate essential roles such as control-
ling chromatin modifications, signaling molecules with functions, hypoxic response, immunity,
and DNA methylation, which can alter the function and fate of the cells (30). Another reduced
super pathway of d-galactarate and d-gulcarate are naturally occurring diacid sugars. Both
compounds can be utilized as a sole source of carbon for E. coli (31). E.coli is a frequent
problem on this farm and is often manifested with diarrhea and dirty eggs. Weakening the
pathogen metabolically and depleting its energy to a level sufficing to keep it under con-
trol could be a possible mechanism of phytogenic action.
Supplementation of phytogen reduced Pyridoxal 59-phosphate (PLP) pathway, involved
in amino acid biosynthetic pathways and enzymatic reactions as an essential cofactor (32).
Together with pyridoxin 59-phosphate (PNP) and pyridoxamine 5’phosphate (PMP) it is consid-
ered the active form of vitamin B6. The production of vitamin B6 in plants, bacteria, and fungi
occurs through de novo PLP biosynthesis with their own biosynthetic capabilities.
Vitamins are known for their potent antioxidant properties that effectively quench the form
more exaggerated in poultry (39). However, one of the major findings of HMP was that de-
spite the variability in microbiota, the microbial functions were preserved, stable, and repro-
ducible in the microbiota communities from different cultures, continents, and genetic
backgrounds. This shifted the interest of researchers toward studying the functional pro-
files; however, this was hindered by the price of shotgun sequencing compared to 16S
amplicon sequencing. Our data show that the functional and taxonomic analysis can pres-
ent two sides of the coin, both equally important, compensating for high variability in the
gut microbial community. The phytogenic feed supplements in chickens can target specific
microbial functions rather than microbial taxa to give health and production benefits.
Conclusions. There is abundant evidence that phytogenic products and their base
ingredients, such as essential oils, if dosed correctly, can bring many health and performance
benefits. This research area is centered on interpreting 16S amplicon microbiota data with
the balance of good and bad bacteria in focus. However, beneficial and pathogenic effects
are strain specific and beyond the resolution of the 16S methodology. Here, we suggest that
the mechanisms of phytogen-derived functional alterations resulting in health and perform-
ance improvements are far more complex and likely different between the products and their
main ingredients. This presents an opportunity for better evaluation of phytogen appropriate-
ness to confront different health and production issues and presents a prospect to investigate
the functional alterations in a range of phytogenic molecules to allow for future specific patho-
gen-tailored product development.
was used to cut the paraffin-embedded blocks and then stained using Hematoxylin and Eosin. The Dibutyl
phthalate Polystyrene Xylene (DPX, Ajax Finechem Australia) mounting medium is then applied to prevent
stain fading. Stained slides were then outsourced to the University of Queensland School of Biomedical
Science histology scanning facility. QuPath v0.3.0 was used to perform morphometric analysis of the ileum.
Clear, intact crypts and villi (n , 20) were positioned, and villus height and crypt depth were measured.
Measurements were then imported into statistical software GraphPad Prism v9.2.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA,
USA) for statistical analysis.
Sequencing and data analysis. The swab DNA extraction was performed as previously described
(40). Briefly, the cells were broken using the lysis protocol developed by Yu and Morrison (41) and purified
using DNA mini spin (Enzymax LLC, CAT# EZC101, Kentucky, USA). After extraction, the quality and quan-
tity of the DNA were measured using NanoDrop One UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The V3-V4 region of 16S
rRNA gene was amplified using the following primers with spacers, barcodes, and Illumina sequencing link-
ers (42): The forward primer was 338F (59-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-399) and the reverse primer was
806R (59-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-39). The sequencing library was completed following the manufac-
turer’s protocol (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and the Illumina MiSeq platform was used for sequenc-
ing (2 300 bp paired-end). Cutadapt (43) was then used to demultiplex the data, followed by the micro-
biota analysis in Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2 (QIIME2) (44). Quality filtering, denoising,
and chimera removal were done using Dada2 (45) plugin with all recommended parameters. SILVA v 138.1
database (46) was used as reference data to assign taxonomy. Data were analyzed at ASV and genus levels.
The analysis and interpretation of the data were completed using the Hellinger transformed (47) data
unless stated otherwise. For other presentation and visualization of the performance data, Calypso v8.72,
and a range of R packages such as pheatmap, phyloseq, vegan, and DeSeq2 were used.
Metagenomic data were obtained with shotgun sequencing of genomic DNA using the Illumina
NovaSeq sequencing platform, with an overall number of 409.8, million quality-filtered joined sequences
(minimum 30.3, maximum 40.1, and average 34.1 million sequences per sample) with a minimum phred
score of 22, zero ambiguous bases and raw sequences with less than 150 nt excluded. The functional
analysis was done using the computational tool HUMAnN2 with UniRef90 databases.
Ethical statement. The Animal Ethics Committee of Central Queensland University approved the
study under approval number 0000022879. All applicable international, national, and institutional guide-
lines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Data availability. All sequencing data are publicly available in NCBI SRA database under project
number PRJNA821923.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was conducted and funded by Central Queensland University Merit
Grant. The data were analyzed using the Isaac Newton High-Performance Computing System
at Central Queensland University. We acknowledge and appreciate Jason Bell’s help in all
aspects of High-Performance Computing.
S.J.Y. analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the paper. Y.S.B. performed the
REFERENCES
1. Australian Chicken Meat Federation Inc. 2020. History of the chicken industry 7. Cazorla SI, Maldonado-Galdeano C, Weill R, De Paula J, Perdigon GDV. 2018.
in Australia. Australian Chicken Meat Federation Inc. North Sydney, Australia. Oral administration of probiotics increases paneth cells and intestinal antimicro-
2. Anonye BO. 2016. General commentary on: alternatives to antibiotic growth bial activity. Front Microbiol 9:736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00736.
promoters in animals. Front Vet Sci 3:74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016 8. Flees JJ, Ganguly B, Dridi S. 2021. Phytogenic feed additives improve
.00074. broiler feed efficiency via modulation of intermediary lipid and protein
3. Attia YA, Alagawany MM, Farag MR, Alkhatib FM, Khafaga AF, Abdel-Moneim metabolism-related signaling pathways. Poult Sci 100:100963. https://doi
AE, Asiry KA, Mesalam NM, Shafi ME, Al-Harthi MA, Abd El-Hack ME. 2020. Phy- .org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.060.
togenic products and phytochemicals as a candidate strategy to improve tol- 9. Galli GM, Petrolli TG, Aniecevski E, Santo AD, Leite F, Griss LG, Dazuk V, Boiago
erance to Coronavirus. Front Vet Sci 7:573159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets MM, Dos Santos HV, Simoes C, Wagner R, Bissacotti BF, Schentiger MR, Da
.2020.573159. Silva AS. 2021. Phytogenic blend protective effects against microbes but affects
4. Bajagai YS, Radovanovic A, Steel JC, Stanley D. 2021. The effects of contin- health and production in broilers. Microb Pathog 152:104590. https://doi.org/10
ual consumption of Origanum vulgare on liver transcriptomics. Animals .1016/j.micpath.2020.104590.
(Basel) 11:398. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020398. 10. Huang FC, Lu YT, Liao YH. 2020. Beneficial effect of probiotics on Pseudo-
5. Murugesan GR, Syed B, Haldar S, Pender C. 2015. phytogenic feed additives monas aeruginosa-infected intestinal epithelial cells through inflamma-
as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoters in broiler chickens. Front tory IL-8 and antimicrobial peptide human beta-defensin-2 modulation.
Vet Sci 2:21. Innate Immun 26:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753425920959410.
6. Thacker PA. 2013. Alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters for use 11. Sabo SDS, Mendes MA, Araujo EDS, Muradian LBA, Makiyama EN, LeBlanc
in swine production: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 4:35. https://doi.org/ JG, Borelli P, Fock RA, Knobl T, Oliveira RPS. 2020. Bioprospecting of probi-
10.1186/2049-1891-4-35. otics with antimicrobial activities against Salmonella Heidelberg and that
produce B-complex vitamins as potential supplements in poultry nutri- 30. Chakraborty AA, Laukka T, Myllykoski M, Ringel AE, Booker MA, Tolstorukov
tion. Sci Rep 10:7235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64038-9. MY, Meng YJ, Meier SR, Jennings RB, Creech AL, Herbert ZT, McBrayer SK,
12. Terada T, Nii T, Isobe N, Yoshimura Y. 2020. Effects of probiotics Lactobacillus Olenchock BA, Jaffe JD, Haigis MC, Beroukhim R, Signoretti S, Koivunen P,
reuteri and Clostridium butyricum on the expression of Toll-like receptors, pro- Kaelin WG, Jr, 2019. Histone demethylase KDM6A directly senses oxygen to
and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and antimicrobial peptides in broiler chick control chromatin and cell fate. Science 363:1217–1222. https://doi.org/10
intestine. J Poult Sci 57:310–318. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0190098. .1126/science.aaw1026.
13. Bajagai YS, Alsemgeest J, Moore RJ, Van TTH, Stanley D. 2020. Phytogenic 31. Hubbard BK, Koch M, Palmer DR, Babbitt PC, Gerlt JA. 1998. Evolution of
products, used as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters, modify the enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: characterization of the
intestinal microbiota derived from a range of production systems: an in (D)-glucarate/galactarate catabolic pathway in Escherichia coli. Biochem-
vitro model. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:10631–10640. https://doi.org/ istry 37:14369–14375. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi981124f.
10.1007/s00253-020-10998-x. 32. Mooney S, Leuendorf JE, Hendrickson C, Hellmann H. 2009. Vitamin B6: a
14. Zou Y, Xiang Q, Wang J, Peng J, Wei H. 2016. Oregano essential oil improves long known compound of surprising complexity. Molecules 14:329–351.
intestinal morphology and expression of tight junction proteins associated https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14010329.
with modulation of selected intestinal bacteria and immune status in a pig 33. Bilski P, Li MY, Ehrenshaft M, Daub ME, Chignell CF. 2000. Vitamin B6 (pyri-
model. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5436738. doxine) and its derivatives are efficient singlet oxygen quenchers and
15. Abudabos AM, Alyemni AH, Dafalla YM, Khan RU. 2016. The effect of phy- potential fungal antioxidants. Photochem Photobiol 71:129–134. https://
togenic feed additives to substitute in-feed antibiotics on growth traits doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2000)071%3C0129:SIPVBP%3E2.0.CO;2.
and blood biochemical parameters in broiler chicks challenged with Sal- 34. Koch-Nolte F, Haag F, Guse AH, Lund F, Ziegler M. 2009. Emerging roles of
monella typhimurium. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:24151–24157. https://doi NAD1 and its metabolites in cell signaling. Sci Signal 2:mr1. https://doi
.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7665-2. .org/10.1126/scisignal.257mr1.
16. Abou-Elkhair R, Selim S, Hussein E. 2018. Effect of supplementing layer 35. Mesquita I, Varela P, Belinha A, Gaifem J, Laforge M, Vergnes B, Estaquier J,
hen diet with phytogenic feed additives on laying performance, egg qual- Silvestre R. 2016. Exploring NAD1 metabolism in host-pathogen interactions.
ity, egg lipid peroxidation and blood biochemical constituents. Anim Cell Mol Life Sci 73:1225–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-015-2119-4.
Nutr 4:394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.05.009. 36. Stranahan LW, Arenas-Gamboa AM. 2021. When the going gets rough: the sig-
17. Saki AA, Aliarabi H, Hosseini Siyar SA, Salari J, Hashemi M. 2014. Effect of a phy- nificance of Brucella lipopolysaccharide phenotype in host-pathogen interac-
togenic feed additive on performance, ovarian morphology, serum lipid pa- tions. Front Microbiol 12:713157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.713157.
rameters and egg sensory quality in laying hen. Vet Res Forum 5:287–293. 37. Kolde R, Franzosa EA, Rahnavard G, Hall AB, Vlamakis H, Stevens C, Daly
18. Khalaji S, Zaghari M, Hatami K, Hatami KH, Hedari-Dastjerdi S, Lotfi L, Nazarian MJ, Xavier RJ, Huttenhower C. 2018. Host genetic variation and its micro-
H. 2011. Black cumin seeds, Artemisia leaves (Artemisia sieberi), and Camellia L. biome interactions within the Human Microbiome Project. Genome Med
plant extract as phytogenic products in broiler diets and their effects on per- 10:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0515-8.
formance, blood constituents, immunity, and cecal microbial population. 38. Human Microbiome Project C. 2012. Structure, function and diversity of
Poult Sci 90:2500–2510. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01393. the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214. https://doi.org/10
19. Paraskeuas V, Fegeros K, Palamidi I, Theodoropoulos G, Mountzouris KC. .1038/nature11234.
2016. Phytogenic Administration and reduction of dietary energy and protein 39. Stanley D, Geier MS, Hughes RJ, Denman SE, Moore RJ. 2013. Highly vari-
levels affects growth performance, nutrient digestibility and antioxidant status able microbiota development in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. PLoS
of broilers. Jpn Poult Sci 53:264–273. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0150113. One 8:e84290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084290.
20. Pirgozliev V, Mansbridge SC, Rose SP, Lillehoj HS, Bravo D. 2019. Immune 40. Bauer BW, Gangadoo S, Bajagai YS, Van TTH, Moore RJ, Stanley D. 2019.
modulation, growth performance, and nutrient retention in broiler chick- Oregano powder reduces Streptococcus and increases SCFA concentra-
ens fed a blend of phytogenic feed additives. Poult Sci 98:3443–3449. tion in a mixed bacterial culture assay. PLoS One 14:e0216853. https://doi
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey472. .org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216853.
21. Wang J, Su S, Pender C, Murugesan R, Syed B, Kim WK. 2021. Effect of a phyto- 41. Yu Z, Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community
genic feed additive on growth performance, nutrient digestion, and immune DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36:808–812. https://