This document provides a template for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of training programs following the Kirkpatrick model. It outlines the different levels of M&E including reaction, learning, behavior, and results. For each level it identifies indicators, methods, data sources, schedule, responsibilities, and intended users of the M&E data.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
451 views2 pages
Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
This document provides a template for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of training programs following the Kirkpatrick model. It outlines the different levels of M&E including reaction, learning, behavior, and results. For each level it identifies indicators, methods, data sources, schedule, responsibilities, and intended users of the M&E data.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
(Enclosure No. 3 to DepEd Memorandum No. ______ s.
2023)
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
National Educators Academy of the Philippines
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan
This is the template for the M&E Plan following the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model. Level of M&E Indicators Methods and Data Sources Schedule of Person/s Support Needed User of M&E Tools M&E Responsible Data What will be What Who and/or what When will M&E Who will be What resources are Who will use the measured? methods/tools will documents will activities be accountable for needed to data gathered? be used to collect provide data or undertaken? ensuring that M&E implement M&E data? evidence on the activities are done? activities? indicators? Reaction ● daily ● daily ● daily post-training ● daily; end of ● M&E officer ● link and/or QR ● PMT-learning (Determine the post-training post-training evaluation form day ● Class manager code to the managers participants’ evaluation evaluation (Google form) evaluation form ● Resource satisfaction with results (venue, ● debriefing ● debriefing notes ● template/guide Persons the learning accommodation, ● parking lot for debriefing ● Hotel/venue environment.) learning questions/ staff sessions) concerns ● NEAP management and partners Learning ● positive ● pretest and ● pretest and ● first and last ● PMT - learning ● link and/or QR ● PMT-learning (Determines the posttest/ posttest posttest results day manager code to the managers percentage of the change score assessment ● Resource learning content form Persons acquired by the ● NEAP participants and if management such sufficiently and partners demonstrate that Page 1 the terminal objectives were achieved) ● satisfactory ● reflection-based ● processed/checke ● end of ● resource person ● timely checking ● participants responses in worksheets d reflection-based session of worksheets ● resource the worksheets persons reflection-based worksheets Behavior ● implemented ● workplace ● means of ● classroom ● school head ● Classroom ● PMT-learning (Determine if workplace application plan verification observation ● mentor observation tool managers learnings and the application template (MOVs) ● immediate ● Resource acquired plans ● classroom supervisor Persons competencies are ● improved observation/tool ● NEAP properly applied in teaching ● pedagogical management the workplace and competencies practices as and partners have improved the (strand 1.5) evidenced by ● Division office participants’ improved ● School performance on the instructional job. This can be strategies, found in the methods, application techniques, and objective.) tactics ● artifacts (e.g. instructional plan) Results ● improved ● increased ● National ● scheduled ● NEAP CO/RO ● assessment ● DepEd Central (Determine how higher-order learning Achievement Test assessment ● M&E Officers paraphernalia Office the applied thinking skills outcomes of the (NAT) on Math, across ● PMT-learning learnings created among learners learners based Science, and governance managers an impact on the ● improved on the improved English level ● Resource participants’ student scores scores on the ● Basic Education ● Division Chiefs Persons in large-scale assessment Exit Assessment CLMD, CID ● NEAP organizational assessments data ● Division/Region/ ● Division Chiefs management performance and District initiated SGOD/HRD and partners if the desired Assessment of ● Division office organization Learning ● School results are being ● PISA/TIMSS Test achieved) scores