Osmosis Lab investigation

Assessment Type ▢ Summative ▢ Formative Student Name

Teacher(s) Farouq Hamdan & Rola El Achkar Subject/ Discipline Biology MYP 4
Unit Title Factories for Life MYP Year 4 Gr. Unit Duration Weeks 6 hrs 10
Inquiry: Establishing the purpose of the unit:

Key Concept Related Concept(s) Global Context

Relationship Function & Model Scientific and technical innovation
Statement of Inquiry
Scientific and technical innovation help us to create models to understand the relationships between the components of a
system and understand their functions.

Assessment Title
The effects of different concentration solutions on potato cells lab experiment
Assessment Task Description
The goal of the task is to design an experiment to investigate and measure the effect of the movement of water (osmosis) on
potato cells through different concentration solutions.
Assessment Duration/Timeline/Due Date
Due Date: October 25, 2023

IB MYP Assessment Criteria

Achieve
Strands addressed Task Specific Clarification TSC ment
level
Criterion B Inquiring and designing
Levels 1-2
o The question or problem of investigation is adequate, but it is
expressed using minimal scientific vocabulary not based on research.
The student is able to: o The hypothesis is broadly defined according to theory.
1. Estate a problem or question to be o Variables have been identified and described, but the distinction
tested by a scientific investigation between them is incorrect or missing.
ii. outline a testable hypothesis o The method does not allow the effective development of the
iii. outline the variables investigation.
iv. design a method, with limited o No reference list is included
success
Levels 3-4 o The question or problem of the investigation is described in broad
terms and is based on some research.
The student is able to: o The hypothesis is clearly and systematically expressed, but not
i. outlines a problem or question to be scientifically justified.
tested by a scientific investigation o Variables are correctly identified as independent and dependent, but
ii. formulate a testable hypothesis using the controls are incomplete.
scientific reasoning o The manipulation of all the variables is broadly explained.
iii. outline how to manipulate the o The method allows for the collection of relevant data.
variables and outline how relevant data o The method is safe.
will be collected o A complete list of materials, with their proper names, is included.
iv. design a safe method in which he or o A reference list is included
she selects materials and equipment
Levels 5-6 o The question or scientific problem of the investigation is described
The student is able to: using scientific vocabulary, based on some research.
i. describes a problem or question to be o The hypothesis is clearly and systematically expressed, and
tested by a scientific investigation scientifically justified using theoretical background.
ii. formulate and explain a testable o Variables are correctly identified as independent, dependent, and
hypothesis using scientific reasoning controlled
iii. describe how to manipulate the o The manipulation, measuring, and controlling of all the variables is
variables, and describe how sufficient, described.
relevant data will be collected iv. design o The method allows for the collection of sufficient and relevant data.
a complete and safe method in which he o The method is completely clear, safe, and logically structured.
or she selects appropriate materials and o A complete list of materials, with their proper names, is included.
equipment o A reference list is included in MLA format.
Levels 7-8 o The question or scientific problem of the investigation is explained
The student is able to: using scientific vocabulary, based on previous research.
i. explain a problem or question to be o The hypothesis is clearly and systematically expressed, and
tested by a scientific investigation scientifically justified using the correct theoretical background.
 Osmosis Lab investigation
ii. formulate and explain a testable o Variables are correctly identified as independent, dependent, and
hypothesis using correct scientific controlled.
reasoning o The manipulation, measuring, and controlling of all the variables is well
iii. explain how to manipulate the explained.
variables, and explain how sufficient, o The method allows for the collection of sufficient and relevant data.
relevant data will be collected o The method is completely clear, safe, and logically structured.
iv. design a logical, complete, and safe o A complete list of materials, with their proper names, is included.
method in which he or she selects o A reference list is included in MLA format
appropriate materials and equipment.
Criterion C Processing and evaluating
Levels 1-2
The student is able to: o The student records the data with errors or omissions.
i. collects and present data in numerical o The student graphically represents the data with large errors or
and/or visual forms omissions.
ii. interpret data o The calculations are not completely correct, or an example is not
iii. state the validity of a prediction included.
based on the outcome of a scientific o The student indicates the relationship/pattern shown by the data.
investigation, with limited success o The student draws a conclusion from the data.
iv. state the validity of the method o The student indicates the validity of the hypothesis based on their
based on the outcome of a scientific interpretation of the results.
investigation, with limited success o The student indicates the validity of the method based on their
v. state improvements or extensions to interpretation of the results.
the method that would benefit the o The student indicates an improvement or improvement to the method
scientific investigation, with limited employed.
success.
o The student records the data correctly in a partial table (titles columns
with units and magnitudes) the raw data or processed data from the
Levels 3-4 investigation.
The student is able to: o The student correctly graphically represents the results, (with title,
correctly collect and present data in labeled axes, correct scale, and line of best fit) or has processed the
numerical and/or visual forms raw data correctly.
ii. accurately interpret data and outline o The necessary calculations are correct although there may be small
results errors in calculation or presentation.
iii. state the validity of a prediction o The student broadly speaking explains the tendency or pattern in the
based on the outcome of a scientific graph.
investigation o The student draws a conclusion from the correct interpretation of the
iv. state the validity of the method results.
based on the outcome of a scientific o The student establishes in broad terms the validity of the hypothesis.
investigation o The student establishes the validity of the method The student
v. state improvements or extensions to describes in broad terms a possible weakness or source of error for the
the method that would benefit the method
scientific investigation. o The student explains in broad terms an improvement for the
weaknesses mentioned or improvements to the method that would
result in a better investigation
o The student records the data correctly in a formatted table (titles
Levels 5-6
columns with units and magnitudes) the raw data and processed data
The student is able to:
from the investigation.
i. correctly collect, organize and present
o The student correctly graphically represents the results (with title,
data in numerical and/or visual forms
labeled axes, correct scale, and line of best fit) or has processed the
ii. accurately interpret data and outline
raw data correctly.
results using scientific reasoning
o The necessary calculations are correct, and the student gives examples.
iii. outline the validity of a prediction
o The student scientifically explains the tendency or pattern in the graph.
based on the outcome of a scientific
o The student draws a conclusion from the correct interpretation of the
investigation
results, and the scientific explanation for this is present.
iv. outline the validity of the method
o The student establishes the validity of the hypothesis, basing their
based on the outcome of a scientific
judgment on the correct interpretation of the results.
investigation
o The student establishes the validity of the method, basing judgments
v. outline improvements or extensions
on the correct interpretation of the results.
to the method that would benefit the
o The student explains clearly two or more possible weaknesses or non-
scientific investigation.
trivial sources of error due to the method.
 Osmosis Lab investigation
o The student explains improvements for the weaknesses mentioned,
and/or improvements to the method that would result in a better
investigation
The student records the data correctly in a formatted table (titles columns
with units and magnitudes) the raw data and processed data from the
investigation.
Levels 7-8 The student correctly graphically represents the results (with title, labelled
The student is able to: axes, correct scale, line of best fit) or has processed the raw data correctly.
i. correctly collects, organizes, The necessary calculations are correct and the student gives examples.
transforms and presents data in The student scientifically explains the tendency/pattern in the graph.
numerical and/ or visual forms The student obtains a principal conclusion, based on the correct
ii. accurately interpret data and outline interpretation of the results.
results using correct scientific reasoning The conclusion is argued with commentaries about the precision and
iii. discuss the validity of a prediction accuracy of the results, and if required the difference in expected and
based on the outcome of a scientific obtained results.
investigation The student establishes the validity of the hypothesis, weighing the
iv. discuss the validity of the method implications, based on the correct interpretation of the results.
based on the outcome of a scientific The student establishes the validity of the method, weighing the
investigation implications and limitations (precision, accuracy) based on the correct
v. describes improvements or extensions interpretation of the results.
to the method that would benefit the The student explains clearly two or more possible weaknesses or non-trivial
scientific investigation. sources of error due to the method.
The student explains detailed realistic improvements for each of the
weaknesses mentioned, and/or improvements to the method that would
result in a better investigation.

Student Self Reflection

What I learned from this task

What helped me to be successful

What I would change if I had to do this

task again
 Osmosis Lab investigation

Investigation the effects of different concentration solutions on potato cells

Osmosis, the process in which solvent molecules move from an area of lower
Introduction solute concentration to an area of higher solute concentration, can easily be
demonstrated with potato experiments. Potatoes are full of both water and
minerals, and will gain water when immersed in watery solutions.
Conversely, they will lose water when in concentrated solutions, such as
those containing a great deal of salts. You will use potatoes to set up osmosis
experiments.
The goal of the task is to design an experiment to investigate and measure
the effect of the movement of water (osmosis) on potato cells through
different concentration solutions.

TASK OVERVIEW

Your goal is to design an experiment to Investigate and measure the effect

Goal of the movement of water (osmosis) on potato cells through different
concentration solutions.

You are biologist investigator

Role

You are an MYP student at a biological lab who is required to design an

Audience experiment to investigate how different concentrated solutions will affect
plant cells by demonstrating the osmosis process by potato cells. .

You are going to use simple equipment to investigate the effect of osmosis
Situation on plant tissue. By finding the percentage change in mass for each piece of
potato slice. So each potato slice will decrease or increase in mass if they
lose or gain water by osmosis.

You are going to design an experiment, apply this experiment a minimum 3

Product times, collect the result, and write your conclusion. Writing the full lab
report format.

Standard for Your work will be assessed using MYP 4-5 criteria B: Inquiring and
Success designing and C: Processing and Evaluating
 Osmosis Lab investigation

Investigation the effects of different concentration solutions on potato cells

MYP Lab Report Template
Use this template to write your design lab. Erase all of the hints under the blue heading and
write your own answers in.
*Hint: Set the variables first as they guide the lab.
I. Title
❏ Include the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. ❏
Write the date the lab was performed.

II. Background Information

❏ Research the topic you are investigating. The information you find should guide your
hypothesis. Write one full paragraph.

III. Research Question

❏ Write exactly what you want to find out.
❏ Hint: How does the independent variable affect the dependent variable….? IV.

Variables

Independent Variable How will it be manipulated How will be controlled

(manipulated/changing
factor)

Dependent Variable How will it be measured How will it be measured in a

(method) consistent, controlled
(What will be measured) manner

Controlled Variable How will it be controlled How would this variable

affect the data if NOT
(external variables that need controlled
to be kept constant in each
trial)
 Osmosis Lab investigation

V. Hypothesis
❏ Predict how the independent variable will affect the dependent variable. Justify your
prediction using scientific reasoning.

❏ Two suggestions for hypothesis formatting:

If the _______________, then the __________________ because

____________.

❏ Hint: As the independent variable increases (or otherwise changes) the dependent variable will
increase/decrease/stay the same because __________________ (explain using scientific reasoning,
perhaps refer to a formula and explain).

VI. Materials/Equipment List

Remember to measure with the correct piece of equipment. Example: A scale measures mass
(g). A beaker measures volume (mL).

Equipment Materials

Non-consumable materials that we use Consumable items that we only use one
over and over again. State quantity if more time. State quantity if more than one is
than one is used. used.

Example: Example:
● 100 mL graduated cylinder ● salt (50 g)
● 100 mL beaker (3) ● distilled water (100 mL)

VII. Diagrams

Go to Insert and the Drawing. Draw and label the picture here. The computer drawing will
automatically be inserted in the document, then click the blue button Save and Close. You
must include all 3 variables in your diagram.
 Osmosis Lab investigation

VIII. Method
❏ Describe how your data will be collected.
❏ Use numbered steps. Do not use “I” or “We.” You should use a commanding voice.
❏ Specify the following:
❏ quantities and volumes of materials,
❏ equipment and how it will be used,
❏ number of measurements.
❏ You will need enough data to clearly show a pattern of how the dependent variable is
affected by the independent variable.
❏ Generally, a minimum of 3 trials is needed for reliable data.
❏ Describe how you will collect the data.
❏ State the controlled variables.
❏ Describe how the data will be processed.
❏ State the calculations you will perform.
❏ State what you will graph and what will be on each axis:
❏ the x-axis should be the independent variable,
❏ the y-axis should be the dependent variable.

IX. Data Table

❏ Table
❏ Include a descriptive title with both variables in the title.
❏ The table should include both the raw and processed data.
❏ Only include units in the heading.
❏ Processed data should be to the right or the bottom of the table.
❏ Record controlled variables under the table.
❏ Include qualitative observations after the table (i.e. The car did not run straight
down the track, color, smell, fizzing).
 Osmosis Lab investigation

1st trial

Concentration Initial Final % 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 =

solution mass mass
(unit) (unit) (unit)
𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 − 𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔
𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎%

2nd trial

Concentration Initial Final % 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 =

solution mass mass
(unit) (unit) (unit)
𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 − 𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔
𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎%

5
 Osmosis Lab investigation

3rd trial

Concentration Initial Final % 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 =

solution mass mass
(unit) (unit) (unit)
𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 − 𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔
𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔
× 𝟏𝟎𝟎%

X. Sample Calculations
❏ Any calculation you do must have ONE sample calculation for each type of calculations
under the data table.
❏ You may show these calculations within the data tables.

Processing data:
❏ when final data is collected and translated into usable information to be on the graph..

Concentration solution
(unit)
Average of % change in mass

5
 Osmosis Lab investigation

XI. Graph

❏ Use the most appropriate form of graph to clearly show the data: bar graph
(discontinuous data) or line/scatterplot graph (continuous data).
❏ Include a numbered and descriptive title for the graph.
❏ Label axes with units.
❏ For a line of best fit draw a straight line with a ruler or smooth curve and do not connect the
dots.
❏ If the graph is drawn by hand it must be a large graph, at least half the page.

XII. Conclusion

❏ State exactly what the results (graph) show. Relate this information to the questions. ❏
Describe how your data supports your hypothesis, does not support your hypothesis or is
inconclusive.
❏ Use the numbers in your results to justify the above.
❏ Describe the “big picture.” Do not simply repeat values in a graph.
❏ Evaluate your data reliability by commenting on outliers in the table or graph or the number
of trials. You can also comment on how close your points are to the best fit line.
Additionally, you can compare your known results to other classmates results.

XIII. Evaluation

❏ Evaluate the method validity - Did the method allow for the collection of sufficient
reliable data to answer the question of the lab?
❏ Were the conditions of the experiment controlled?
❏ Was the independent variable manipulated such that the data (dependent
variable) could answer the question?
❏ Does the method allow for the collection of precise measurements?
❏ Does the selection of measuring instruments lead to the collection of reliable
data?
❏ What errors are associated with the measurement instrument?
❏ Is the sample size adequate? Were the readings over a large enough range? Were
there enough repetitions?
❏ Improvements to the Method - Suggest improvements to the method based on errors
identified in the lab.
❏ How could the method be modified to produce better data?
❏ Do not simply state that a digital balance is better than a triple beam balance, or that
you may have made human error in measurements. Be more specific and
descriptive.
❏ Make suggestions for further inquiry - How could the experiment be extended if you
had more time to do another experiment?