Class VIII History Chapter 9 Extra Questions
Class VIII History Chapter 9 Extra Questions
Q.10. Who was the viceroy of India at the time of partition of Bengal?
Answer: Lord Curzon was the viceroy of India at the time of partition of Bengal.
Answer: Bipin Chandra Pal, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Lala Lajpat Rai
Q.13. Who raised the slogan “Freedom is my birthright and I shall have it!”?
Answer: Tilak raised the slogan, “Freedom is my birthright and I shall have it!”
Answer: The leaders of the Khilafat agitation were Mohammad Ali and Shaukat Ali.
Answer: It refers to Jallianwala massacre that occurred in Amritsar on Baisakhi day (13 April,
1919).
Answer: Chitta Ranjan Das was a lawyer from East Bengal. He was especially active in the
Non- Cooperation Movement.
Answer: Bhagat Singh was a revolutionary nationalist. His slogan was “Inquilab Zindabad!”
Q.18. Who was the first Indian woman to become President of the Indian National Congress?
Answer: Sarojini Naidu was the first Indian woman to become President of the Indian National
Congress (1925).
Answer: Rabindranath Tagore had renounced the British knighthood in protest against the
Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 1919.
Q.21. Who was A.O Hume? What role did he play in the history of India?
Or
Who was AO Hume? What was his contribution in the Indian national movement?
Answer: A.O Hume was a retired British official. He played a part in bringing Indians from the
various regions together.
Answer: The literal meaning of “sarvajanik” is “of or for all the people” (sarva = all + janik = of
the people).
Answer: The Indian National Congress was established when 72 delegates from all over the
country met at Bombay in December 1885.
Q.24. Why did Mahatma Gandhi along with other Indians establish the Natal Congress in South
Africa?
Or
Who established the Natal Congress and why?
Or
When was Natal Congress established?
Answer: In 1895, along with other Indians, Mahatma Gandhi established the Natal Congress to
fight against racial discrimination.
Q.25. Who wrote the book Poverty and Un-British rule in India? What was it about?
Answer: Dadabhai Naoroji wrote the book Poverty and Un-British Rule in India. It offered a
scathing criticism of the economic impact of British rule.
Q.1. What did the Muslim League resolution of 1940 ask for?
Answer: The Muslim League resolution of 1940 asked for “Independent States” for Muslims in
the north-western and eastern areas of the country.
Answer: Lala Lajpat Rai was a nationalist from Punjab. He was one of the leading members of
the Radical group which was critical of the politics of petitions. He was also an active member of
the Arya Samaj.
Answer: Government of India Act of 1935 prescribed provincial autonomy and the government
announced elections to the provincial legislatures in 1937. The Congress formed governments
in 7 out of 11 provinces.
Q.4. On what term were the congress leaders ready to support the British war effort at the time
of Second World War? Did British accept their demand?
Answer: Congress leaders were ready to support the British war effort. But in return they
wanted that India be granted independence after the war. The British refused to concede the
demand.
Q.5. Who did the Indian National Congress wish to speak for?
Answer: Indian National Congress is composed of the representatives, not of any one class or
community of India, but of all the different communities of India. Thus, Indian National Congress
wished to speak for all the people of country.
Q.6. Why did the Muslim League announce 16 August 1946 as ‘ Direct Action Day’?
Or
Why did the Muslim League decide to observe the ‘Direct Action Day’ on August 1946?
Answer: After the failure of the Cabinet Mission, the Muslim League decided on mass agitation
for winning its Pakistan demand. It announced 16 August 1946 as “Direct Action Day”.
Q.7. Why did Mahatma Gandhi break the salt law?
Answer: Mahatma Gandhi broke the salt law because according to this law, the state had a
monopoly on the manufacture and sale of salt. Mahatma Gandhi along with other nationalists
reasoned that it was sinful to tax salt since it is such an essential item of our food.
Answer: Azad was born in Mecca to a Bengali father and an Arab mother. Well-versed in many
languages, Azad was a scholar of Islam and an exponent of the notion of wahadat-i-deen, the
essential oneness of all religions. An active participant in Gandhian movements and a staunch
advocate of Hindu- Muslim unity, he was opposed to Jinnah’s two-nation theory.
Answer: Their goals were stated as the goals of all the people of India, not those of any one
region, community or class. They worked with the idea that the people should be sovereign – a
modern consciousness and a key feature of nationalism. In other words, they believed that the
Indian people should be empowered to take decisions regarding their affairs.
Answer: In September 1939, after two years of Congress rule in the provinces, the Second
World War broke out. Critical of Hitler, Congress leaders were ready to support the British war
effort. But in return they wanted that India be granted independence after the war. The British
refused to concede the demand. The Congress ministries resigned in protest.
Answer: Mahatma Gandhi was against violent movements. He abruptly called off the
Non-Cooperation Movement when in February 1922 a crowd of peasants set fire to a police
station in Chauri Chaura. Twentytwo policemen were killed on that day. The peasants were
provoked because the police had fired on their peaceful demonstration.
Answer: Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan was the Pashtun leader from the North West Frontier
Province. Also known as Badshah Khan, he was the founder of the Khudai Khidmatgars, a
powerful non-violent movement among the Pathans of his province. Badshah Khan was strongly
opposed to the Partition of India. He criticised his Congress colleagues for agreeing to the 1947
division.
Q.13. Why was Simon commission sent to India? Why did Indian boycott it?|
Or
What was the main reason of boycott of Simon commission?
Or
Why was Simon Commission sent to India and what were the consequences?
Or
Why did the Simon Commission come to India?
Or
Write a short note on Simon Commission.
Answer: In 1927 the British government in England decided to send a commission headed by
Lord Simon to decide India’s political future. The Commission had no Indian representative. The
decison created an outrage in India. All political groups decided to boycott the Commission.
When the Commission arrived it was met with demonstrations with banners saying “Simon Go
Back”.
Q.14. What role did Ambabai play in the Indian freedom struggle?
Answer: Ambabai of Karnataka had been married at age twelve. Widowed at sixteen, she
picketed foreign cloth and liquor shops in Udipi. She was arrested, served a sentence and was
rearrested. Between prison terms she made speeches, taught spinning, and organised prabhat
pheris. Ambabai regarded these as the happiest days of her life because they gave it a new
purpose and commitment.
Answer: Purna Swaraj would never come on its own. It had to be fought for. In 1930, Gandhiji
declared that he would lead a march to break the salt law. According to this law, the state had a
monopoly on the manufacture and sale of salt. Mahatma Gandhi along with other nationalists
reasoned that it was sinful to tax salt since it is such an essential item of our food. The Salt
March related the general desire of freedom to a specific grievance shared by everybody, and
thus did not divide the rich and the poor.
Answer: Two important developments of the mid-1920s were the formation of the Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a Hindu organisation, and the Communist Party of India. These
parties have held very different ideas about the kind of country India should be. The
revolutionary nationalist Bhagat Singh too was active in this period. The decade closed with the
Congress resolving to fight for Purna Swaraj (complete independence) in 1929 under the
presidentship of Jawaharlal Nehru. Consequently, “Independence Day” was observed on 26
January 1930 all over the country.
Q17. How did people participate in non-cooperation movement during 1921-22?
Q.18. How was the politics of the Radicals within the Congress different from that of the
Moderates?
Answer: By the 1890s many Indians began to raise questions about the political style of the
Congress. In Bengal, Maharashtra and Punjab, leaders such as Bepin Chandra Pal, Bal
Gangadhar Tilak and Lala Lajpat Rai were beginning to explore more radical objectives and
methods. They criticised the Moderates for their “politics of prayers”, and emphasised the
importance of self-reliance and constructive work. They argued that people must rely on their
own strength, not on the “good” intentions of the government; people must fight for swaraj.
Answer: In 1905 Viceroy Curzon partitioned Bengal. At that time Bengal was the biggest
province of British India and included Bihar and parts of Orissa. The British argued for dividing
Bengal for reasons of administrative convenience. But clearly, it was closely tied to the interests
of British officials and businessmen. Even so, instead of removing the non-Bengali areas from
the province, the government separated East Bengal and merged it with Assam. Perhaps the
main British motives were to curtail the influence of Bengali politicians and to split the Bengali
people.
Answer: In 1920 the British imposed a harsh treaty on the Turkish Sultan or Khalifa. People
were furious about this as they had been about the Jallianwala massacre. Also, Indian Muslims
were keen that the Khalifa be allowed to retain control over Muslim sacred places in the
erstwhile Ottoman Empire. The leaders of the Khilafat agitation, Mohammad Ali and Shaukat
Ali, now wished to initiate a full-fledged Non-Cooperation Movement. Gandhiji supported their
call and urged the Congress to campaign against “Punjab wrongs” (Jallianwala massacre), the
Khilafat wrong and demand swaraj.
Q.21. Who were the Moderates? How did they propose to struggle against British rule?
Answer: It has often been said that the Congress in the first twenty years was “moderate” in its
objectives and methods. The congress leaders of this period were called ‘moderates’. The
Moderate leaders wanted to develop public awareness about the unjust nature of British rule.
They published newspapers, wrote articles, and showed how British rule was leading to the
economic ruin of the country. They criticised British rule in their speeches and sent
representatives to different parts of the country to mobilise public opinion. They felt that the
British had respect for the ideals of freedom and justice, and so they would accept the just
demands of Indians.
Q.2. Under what circumstances did Mahatma Gandhi initiate Quit India Movement?
Or
Why did Gandhi ji start Quit India Movement?
Or
Why was the Quit India Movement started?
Or
Write a short note on Quit India Movement.
Answer: In September 1939, after two years of Congress rule in the provinces, the Second
World War broke out. Critical of Hitler, Congress leaders were ready to support the British war
effort. But in return they wanted that India be granted independence after the war. The British
refused to concede the demand. The Congress ministries resigned in protest. Mahatma Gandhi
decided to initiate a new phase of movement against the British in the middle of the Second
World War. The British must quit India immediately, he told them. To the people he said, “do or
die” in your effort to fight the British – but you must fight non-violently.
Q.3. What economic impact did the First World War have on India?
Answer: The First World War altered the economic and political situation in India. It led to a
huge rise in the defence expenditure of the Government of India. The government in turn
increased taxes on individual incomes and business profits. Increased military expenditure and
the demands for war supplies led to a sharp rise in prices which created great difficulties for the
common people. On the other hand, business groups reaped fabulous profits from the war. The
war created a demand for industrial goods (jute bags, cloth, rails) and caused a decline of
imports from other countries into India. So Indian industries expanded during the war, and
Indian business groups began to demand greater opportunities for development.
Q.5. Why were people dissatisfied with British rule in the 1870s and 1880s?
Or
What reasons were responsible for the growth of dissatisfaction amongst people against British
rule in 1970’s?
Answer: People were dissatisfied with British rule in the 1870s and 1880s due to the following
reasons:
The Arms Act was passed in 1878, disallowing Indians from possessing arms.
In the same year the Vernacular Press Act was also enacted in an effort to silence those who
were critical of the government. The Act allowed the government to confiscate the assets of
newspapers including their printing presses if the newspapers published anything that was
found “objectionable”.
In 1883, there was a furore over the attempt by the government to introduce the Ilbert Bill. The
bill provided for the trial of British or European persons by Indians, and sought equality between
British and Indian judges in the country. But when white opposition forced the government to
withdraw the bill, Indians were enraged.
Q.6. State the demands of the Congress made in its early years.
Or
What were the demands of the congress in its early years?
Answer: The Congress in the first twenty years was “moderate” in its objectives and methods.
During this period it made several demands.
The Congress demanded a greater voice for Indians in the government and in administration.
It wanted the Legislative Councils to be made more representative, given more power, and
introduced in provinces where none existed.
It demanded that Indians be placed in high positions in the government. For this purpose it
called for civil service examinations to be held in India as well, not just in London.
The demand for Indianisation of the administration was part of a movement against racisim,
since most important jobs at the time were monopolised by white officials.
Other demands included the separation of the judiciary from the executive, the repeal of the
Arms Act and the freedom of speech and expression.
It demanded reduction of revenue, cut in military expenditure, and more funds for irrigation.
Q.7. What was the Rowlatt act? Give an account of the Rowlatt Satyagraha?
Or
Why was the Satyagraha call given by Gandhiji in 1919? What did it lead to?
Q.8. Discuss the various forms that the Non-Cooperation Movement took in different parts of
India. How did the people understand Gandhiji?
Q.9. Discuss those developments of the 1937-47 period that led to the creation of Pakistan.
Answer: Developments of the 1937-47 period that led to the creation of Pakistan
From the late 1930s, the League began viewing the Muslims as a separate “nation” from the
Hindus. In developing this notion it may have been influenced by the history of tension between
some Hindu and Muslim groups in the 1920s and 1930s.
More importantly, the provincial elections of 1937 seemed to have convinced the League that
Muslims were a minority, and they would always have to play second fiddle in any democratic
structure. It feared that Muslims may even go unrepresented. The Congress’s rejection of the
League’s desire to form a joint Congress- League government in the United Provinces in 1937
also annoyed the League.
The Congress’s failure to mobilise the Muslim masses in the 1930s allowed the League to widen
its social support. It sought to enlarge its support in the early 1940s when most Congress
leaders were in jail.
At the end of the war in 1945, the British opened negotiations between the Congress, the
League and themselves for the independence of India. The talks failed because the League saw
itself as the sole spokesperson of India’s Muslims. The Congress could not accept this claim
since a large number of Muslims still supported it.
Elections to the provinces were again held in 1946. The Congress did well in the “General”
constituencies but the League’s success in the seats reserved for Muslims was spectacular. It
persisted with its demand for “Pakistan”.
In March 1946 the British cabinet sent a three-member mission to Delhi to examine this demand
and to suggest a suitable political framework for a free India.
This mission suggested that India should remain united and constitute itself as a loose
confederation with some autonomy for Muslim-majority areas. But it could not get the Congress
and the Muslim League to agree to specific details of the proposal. Partition now became more
or less inevitable.
After the failure of the Cabinet Mission, the Muslim League decided on mass agitation for
winning its Pakistan demand. It announced 16 August 1946 as “Direct Action Day”.
Ultimately in 1947 partition took place with the birth of new country.
Q.10. Evaluate the dynamic role of Gandhiji in the Indian nationalist struggle for freedom as a
leader of the masses.