Session6 ETHICS FT24
Session6 ETHICS FT24
Session 9:
Managing Sustainable Business Models
sustainability
January 23 & Session 7: Session 8:
February 02, 2024 From Output Measurement to Impact Management
Impact Valuation
Session 5: Session 6:
Beginning the Corporate Social Irresponsibility Business Ethics
sustainability
transformation
Session 3: Session 4:
January 09 & 10, 2024 Regulatory Landscape and Sustainability and CSR Strategy and
Sustainability Disclosure Target Setting
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship
and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Business ethics is often said to be an oxymoron- bringing together two apparently contradictory concepts.
• Business is often seen to be in some way unethical or at best, amoral (outside of our normal moral
considerations).
• However, even if we feel that in many cases, business is lead by the wrong ethics, it is still led by ethics of
some sort.
• Clearly, it makes sense to understand why business decisions are made in this way.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Definition: „Business ethics is the study of business situations, activities, and decisions where issues of
right and wrong [in a moral sense] are adressed.“
• However, ethics and the law are not equivalent.
• The law is essentially an institutionalization or codification of ethics into specific social rules, regulations, and
proscriptions.
Ethics Law
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University
Press.
• Morality is concerned with the norms, values, and beliefs embedded in social processes which define right
and wrong for an individual or a community.
• Ethics is concerned with the study of morality and the application of reason to elucidate specific rules
and principles that determine right and wrong for a given situation.
• These rules and principles are called ethical theories.
Potential solution
Morality Ethics Ethical Theory
to ethical problem
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate
citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
“Suppose you are the driver of a trolley. The trolley rounds a bend and there come into view ahead five track workmen who have been repairing the
track (and which cannot escape the track). The breaks of the trolley don’t work but there is a spur of the track leading off to the right to which you could
turn the trolley. On that track, there is only one workman. Is it morally permissible to turn the trolley?”
Foot (1967)
http://moralmachine.mit.edu/
Would it be morally
permissible to
operate anyway?
• We can judge whether a decision is right or wrong by regarding its consequences and engaging in a cost-
benefit analysis.
• Some things are just categorically wrong, even if the cost-benefit analysis is positive.
• Sometimes, we have to regard the intrinsic quality of the act.
Western modernist ethical theories are based on philosophical thinking generated in Europe and North America
beginning with the enlightenment in the 18th century.
Motivation/
Action Outcomes
Principles
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
VS.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Problems:
• Subjectivity
• Distribution of utility
• Problems of quantification
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Western modernist ethical theories are based on philosophical thinking generated in Europe and North America
beginning with the enlightenment in the 18th century.
Motivation/
Action Outcomes
Principles
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Ethics of rights: start by assigning a right to one party and then advocating a corresponding duty on
another party to protect that right.
• Ethics of duties: begin with assigning of a duty to act in a certain way to an actor.
• Central to many religious perspectives on business ethics.
• Start from a divine revelation: duties to god, god-given rights.
• What is right and wrong has a divine, eternal validity, regardless whether the outcomes are in anybody‘s
self-interest or result in more pleasure and pain.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate
citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Actions can only be called moral if they are done out of obligation.
• Example: A merchant does not cheat, because he does not want to scare his customers off in
order to take higher profits. So he does not act out of the principle of honesty, but out of a
selfish intention. → the action does not have moral value.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Maxim 1: Would we really want companies using child labor to be a general rule?
Maxim 2: Do we see the kids in the example as a means to higher profits or as an end in
themselves?
Maxim 3: Would we want our decision to be headline news?
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate
citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Absolutism: claims that there are eternal, universally applicable moral principles.
Right and wrong are objective qualities that can be rationally determined.
Pluralism: accepts different moral convictions and backgrounds while at the same time
suggesting that a consensus on basic principles and rules in certain social
contexts can and should be reached.
Source: Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business Ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Source: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/
Source: Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 117-126.
Moral Moral
licensing cleansing
Zhong, C. B., Liljenquist, K. A., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation. Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making, 75-89.
Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners the paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological science, 20(4), 523-528.
Source: Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2013). License to ill: The effects of corporate social responsibility and CEO moral identity
on corporate social irresponsibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 861-893.
Source Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological science, 20(3), 393-398.
Experiment:
Decision task: 10€ versus the life of a mouse.
In a second group, participants were assigned role of buyers and
sellers. Every seller receives a mouse, every buyer 20€. Prices can
be negotiated.
Results:
Without negotiation: 45% took the money (and killed the mouse).
With negotiation: 75% took the money (and killed the mouse),
average price: 6.40€.
Source: Falk, A., & Szech, N. (2013). Morals and markets. Science, 340(6133), 707-711.
Furthermore:
Recalling the 10 commandments and swearing on the bible even
worked for atheists.
The same effect could be observed by asking students to recall the
school‘s honor code!
Source: Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy &
Marketing, 25(1), 117-126.
Experiment: 20,000 automobile insurance forms - number of miles reported determines the premium that has
to be paid.
At the bottom of the page: „I promise that the information I am providing is true“ + signature.
For half of the forms, the statement + signature was moved to the top of the page.
Source: Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2011). When to Sign on the Dotted Line?: Signing First Makes Ethics Salient and Decreases
Dishonest Self-reports. Harvard Business School.