Presentation Helen Cleak Turnitin Event 10 Nov
Presentation Helen Cleak Turnitin Event 10 Nov
ASSESSMENT INTO
CURRICULUM TO LEVERAGE
STUDENT LEARNING
Dr. Helen Cleak, PhD Adjunct, Associate Professor
School of Allied Health, Human Service and Sport
La Trobe University, Australia
Authentic Assessment- from testing knowledge to applying learning to actual practice situations
Types of Assessments
Academic Integrity and Assessment Security-what it means for teaching technology and policies
• In recent years, global attention has been directed towards improving educational programs in
order to prepare students for a changing future.
• Increasingly, higher education is managed and funded according to performance criteria other
than research output and excellence.
• For example, in the UK and Australia, new regulatory requirements are increasingly performance
based and they standardize, assess and rank Universities on quality indicators such as teaching,
student retention and graduate employment.
• In particular, student ratings of their learning experiences have become mandatory and publicly
reported for national comparisons.
In summary, higher education is increasingly focused on the student experience and outcomes.
• So, to be competitive in the global economy, higher education has recognised that the centuries-old model of education with
its emphasis on rote learning and objective testing is not adequately preparing their students for future work
• As a result, teaching and learning have undergone reforms and improvements with the input of LMS platforms and access to
innovative technology, yet assessment methods in tertiary education is still some way behind.
• There is a new focus placed on creativity and problem solving to develop students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes beyond the
usual, narrowly focused curriculum and assessment of the past.
• The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a dramatic shift in approaches to learning and the needs of learners.The pandemic saw
many universities move rapidly online and the annual data on student satisfaction indicated that while many students
appreciated the efforts of the academics who supported them, there was a drop in student satisfaction, with the 2020 QILT
Student Experience Survey (SES) observing undergraduate student satisfaction levels of 68.4 per cent, down from a steady
previous average of around 78 to 80 per cent.
• However, universities that had been purposefully building their online capability, with a strong focus on the student
experience, fared better
Authentic assessment has been proposed as having potential to enhance student learning in preparation for a changing world.
Traditional Teaching
and Learning
Merely memorizing content long enough for a Simply acquiring knowledge through
test does not foster deep learning and does not memorization and lecture is not sufficient to
lead to higher-level thinking demonstrate the essential skills necessary to be
. successful in a particular field or profession.
Authentic
Assessment
For classes with higher-level assessments, there is
In order to establish knowledge students develop an increase in cognitive processing along with
connections among facts and apply new retention and transfer rather than a simple
information within a variety of contexts. Educators reproduction of material and isolated facts.
strive to prepare students who can critically reason
and integrate knowledge, skills, and professional In authentic assessment, students learn the
values across a wide variety of situations content and then apply it to meaningful and
relevant tasks
Memorising and recalling information. Making sense of new information and linking it to what is already known from
experience.
Learning is about obtaining more and more facts. Learning is about helping the trainee to see things differently and in a way that is
individual and meaningful.
Involves lectures. Involves interactive lectures, group discussions, simulations, demonstrations and
practice.
NOTE: Testing knowledge to ensure students understand basic concepts still has a place. Research supports the value of quizzes,
examinations, and feedback to reinforce recall and can use information gained from such assessments to assess gaps in student
learning and inform further course and curriculum design. It also offers the teacher a way of authenticating a student’s ability when
other tasks are completed.
• This, in turn, can create a better appreciation and understanding of a subject area, thus
developing more interest and motivation towards the course.
• Higher-level skills and the growth of critical thinking and problem-solving skills are best practiced
with collaboration of others.
• Introducing relevance through meaningful collaborative activities and investigations can change
students’ perceptions about a course they may deem boring and tedious at the outset. Activities
leading to assessments that require thought, involvement, and thinking are certainly innovative to
many tertiary students because they have experienced objective testing for most of their
educational careers
• Students can participate more fully in activities and real-world experiences that have a direct
bearing on their careers, thus preparing them for challenges that lie ahead
• No assessment is immune to cheating, and recent large-scale survey research suggests that
exams are the site of increased cheating - and more undetected cheating - than take-home
written tasks.
• Assessment security in online settings has proved a contentious matter since the onset of the
pandemic and the increasing move to a hybrid model of teaching.
• Assessment security involves a validation of the security of the assessment for the student
and cannot be open to unauthorized use by someone else.
• As we adapt to remote learning higher education must ensure that students are achieving
the learning outcomes for which they are assessed, across all learning environments. But how
should we apply assessment security and academic integrity to validate assessment
outcomes?
That requires students to appropriately acknowledge the work of others, to study independently on individual assessments
(unless it is a group task), and to make sure that other students can't copy or misuse their work.
Plagiarism is taking and using Collusion is the unauthorised Cheating can occur in exams
another person’s ideas, or way collaboration on assessable and other types of
of expressing them, and passing work (written, oral or practical) assessments. It can include
them off as your own by failing with other people. Collusion copying the work of others, to
to give appropriate may be with another student or get someone to do the
acknowledgement. This with anyone external to the assessment, or to bring
includes material sourced from University. unauthorised materials into an
the internet, staff, other exam. Cheating is a very serious
students, and published and offence and could result in
unpublished works. suspension or exclusion from
the University
Students will have to participate in additional If the breach is found to be intentional or reckless,
academic skills development about the the matter is reported to the Associate Dean of the
consequences of academic misconduct. The faculty and will be investigated as academic
assessment will be marked on its merit, reflecting misconduct.
the poor academic practice indicated by the Penalties include:
unintentional breach. o a zero mark for the assessment task
Penalties include: o a zero mark for the unit
o loss of marks o suspension from the course
o re-marking to exclude the section of work that o exclusion from the University.
breaches academic integrity Where a penalty or disciplinary action is applied, the
o resubmitting all or part of the work. outcome is recorded and kept for seven years, or for
A warning is recorded on a University register for 15 years if the penalty was exclusion.
seven years to document that you’ve been
counselled about academic integrity rules.
• Litchfield, B., & Dempsey, J. (2015). Authentic Assessment of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes, in
New Diections for Teaching and Learning, no. 142, Summer 2015 © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
DOI: 10.1002/tl.20130
• Neden, J., Cleak, H. & Thomson, S. (2019). Towards Agility: Scaffolding Anticipative Education in
Social Work, British Journal of Social Work, 0, 1–19.
• Hains-Wesson, R., Pollard, V., Kaider, F., & Young, K. (2020). STEM academic teachers’ experiences
of undertaking authentic assessment-led reform: a mixed method approach, Studies in Higher
Education, 45:9, 1797-1808.
• Poindexter, K., Hagler, D., & Lindell, D.(2015). Designing Authentic Assessment Strategies for Nurse
Educators, Nurse Educator, 40, 1, 36-40.