Integration - Request For Crazy Integrals - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Integration - Request For Crazy Integrals - Mathematics Stack Exchange
Home
Request for crazy integrals Ask Question
Tags
I'm a sucker for exotic integrals like the one evaluated in this post. I don't really know
Featured on Meta
why, but I just can't get enough of the amazing closed forms that some are able to
Users
come up with.
28 Seeking feedback on tag colors update
Unanswered
So, what are your favorite exotic integral identities, and how do you prove them? Site maintenance - Wednesday,
TEAMS
December 13, 2023 @ 01:00 UTC
(Tuesday,...
integration definite-integrals soft-question big-list
Stack Overflow for
Teams – Start
collaborating and
Linked
sharing organizational Share Cite Follow asked Dec 5, 2018 at 20:40
knowledge. 250 "Integral Milking"
clathratus
16.8k 3 24 74
40 Integral for the New Year 2019!
37
Definite integrals solvable using the
2 You may want to invest in this book. I am giving it to myself as a Christmas present Feynman Trick
amazon.com/dp/0521796369/… – user150203 Dec 6, 2018 at 3:39
42
An astounding identity:
π/2
1 You should refer to this question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1096701/nice-book- ∫0 ln|sin(mx)| ⋅ ln|sin(nx)| dx
Create a free Team on-integrals – user150203 Dec 6, 2018 at 3:46
18
Nice book on integrals
Why Teams?
1 I know what you mean - I can't get enough of 'em either! There's that one that Peter Borwein
2
likes to use in his demostrations: a product of progressively scaled sinc functions, that's π/2 1 (x +1) ln(1+x)
10 Integral ∫0 dx
upto a certain point then starts to be a bit less. A very very tiny bit! – AmbretteOrrisey Dec x4 −x2 +1
8, 2018 at 2:32 Evaluating the integral
14
cos(x− x )
1
You can invent such integrals through "milking" techniques described here. Perhaps this one ∞
∫−∞ 1+x2
dx
is the most remarkable they found. – J.G. Dec 3, 2020 at 8:13
29 Evaluate
2 3
–
x log(1 + x )[log( )]
∞ x ln(tanh(x))2 ln 3 ln3 (2 + √3) 1 2 1−x
π4 π2 ∫0 dx
∫ dx = − – − – − – Li2 1+x
0 3 cosh(2x) − 2e−2x 96√3 24√3 12√3
2
∞ arctan(x )
1 π2 1 π2 – 1 – 16 Integral ∫0
(− – ) + ( )
dx
– Li 2 – − – Li 2 (√ 3 − 2) − – Li 4 (2 − √ 3) x4 +x2 +1
√3 12√3 √3 4√3 2√3
1 Examples of non-trivial exclusively
– 6
+ – Li4 (−2 + √3) irrational integrals?
2√3
– Setness Ramesory Sep 28, 2021 at 13:02 See more linked questions
π/2
π 3 gcd2 (m, n) π ln2 (2) Why am I getting "no such file" in find results
∫ ln | sin(mx)| ln | sin(nx)|dx = + for files that exist?
0 24 mn 2
Chess, but with gravity? #1
...where Ω is the Omega Constant, w is the Dottie Number, and m, n ∈ N . Big difference in rendered appearance between
blender 3.6.4 and 4.0.2
Share Cite Follow edited Jan 24, 2019 at 21:27 answered Dec 18, 2018 at 0:43 Taking directly my second flight instead of
layover
Franklin Pezzuti Dyer
39.4k 9 71 162
Question feed
1 Just the user I was hoping would answer! Thank you for your contribution, those integrals
look delicious! :) – clathratus Dec 18, 2018 at 1:02
Are you sure that the 6 -th integral you listed (the one that evaluates as π 2 ) converges? The
graph of it tells me otherwise... – clathratus Jan 24, 2019 at 17:30
@clathratus My apologies; the −x2 should have been −x4 . I have fixed my answer so that the
integral converges. – Franklin Pezzuti Dyer Jan 24, 2019 at 21:28
Add a comment
Here are some links to a few integrals: 1 (Big list, but not all of them got the right
answer). From AoPS: 2, 3 , 4. Some that are solvable with Feynman's trick: here.
1
∞ cos(x − ) π
I11 = ∫ x
dx =
−∞ (x + 1 2
) 2e2
x
1
ln(1 − x) ln(1 − x 4 ) 67 π
I12 = ∫ dx = ζ(3) − G
0 x 32 2
π –
−−−− √ 2π(5π 2 + 12π ln 2 − 12 ln2 2)
I13 = ∫
2
2
x √tan xdx =
0 96
π
5 π
I14 = ∫ Cl2 ( )
4
arcsinh(sin x)dx = G −
0 8 3
π
π3 π
I15 = ∫
2
x arcsin(sin x − cos x)dx = + ln2 2
0 96 8
∞ ∞
ln(1 + x + y) 7
I16 = ∫ ∫ dxdy = ζ(3)
0 0 xy ((1 + x + y)(1 + 1/x + 1/y) − 1) 2
Share Cite Follow edited Jun 12, 2020 at 10:38 answered Dec 5, 2018 at 22:41
Community Bot Zacky
1 25.5k 2 68 154
6 These are really nice integrals. Thanks. – clathratus Dec 6, 2018 at 0:58
2 Cheers @Zacky! I too will be working on these! – user150203 Dec 6, 2018 at 3:37
Could I have a starter tip on I6 and I7 ? I'm very lost – clathratus Dec 13, 2018 at 3:09
1 @Zacky Oh yeah, looks like you have one. Nice! – Franklin Pezzuti Dyer Jan 5, 2019 at
19:53
∞ 1
cos(x − )
∫ x
dx
1 2
−∞ (x + x)
You might find a lot of crazy integrals and series in the book, (Almost) Impossible
Integrals, Sums, and Series. A few examples of integrals,
8 π/2
∫ cot(x) log(cos(x)) log2 (sin(x)) Li3 (− tan2 (x))dx
0
109 23 1
= ζ(7) − ζ(3)ζ(4) + ζ(2)ζ(5);
128 32 16
log(1+√2)
∫ coth(x) log(sinh(x)) log(2 − cosh 2 (x))Li2 (tanh2 (x)) dx
0
73 17
= ζ(5) − ζ(2)ζ(3);
128 64
log2 (1 − x) Li3 ( )
x
1 x−1
∫ dx
0 1+x
1 1 7 5
= log6 (2) − log4 (2)ζ(2) + log3 (2)ζ(3) + log2 (2)ζ(4)
36 6 24 8
581
− ζ(6)
48
7 79 2
− log(2)ζ(2)ζ(3) − ζ (3);
8 64
1
sin(θ) sin( ) ∫
θ x
(ζ(m + 1)
2 0 (1 − x) (1 − 2x cos(θ) + x 2)
− Lim+1 (x))dx
∞
(k + 1)θ
) )
Hk+1 kθ
= (−1) m−1
∑ sin( sin(
k=1
(k + 1)m+1 2 2
(k + 1)θ
) sin( )
kθ
∞ sin(
m
2 2
+(−1) m−1
∑(−1) i−1
ζ(i) ∑ ;
i=2 k=1
(k + 1)m−i+2
1
x(cos(θ) − x)
sin( ) ∫
θ
(ζ(m + 1) − Lim+1 (x))dx
2 0 (1 − x)(1 − 2x cos(θ) + x 2)
∞
(k + 1)θ
) )
Hk+1 kθ
= (−1) m−1
∑ sin( cos(
k=1
(k + 1)m+1 2 2
(k + 1)θ
) cos( )
kθ
∞ sin(
m
2 2
+(−1) m−1
∑(−1) i−1
ζ(i) ∑ .
i=2 k=1
(k + 1)m−i+2
A few examples of series (which you may also transform into some fancy integrals if
you wish to),
∞
9
( )
Hn H1 H2 Hn
∑ + + ⋯ + = 10ζ(7) + ζ(2)ζ(5)
n=1
n2 13 23 n 3 2
23
− ζ(3)ζ(4);
2
∞
23 11
( )
Hn H1 H2 Hn
∑ + + ⋯ + = ζ(3)ζ(4) − ζ(2)ζ(5)
n=1
n3 12 22 n 2 2 2
− 4ζ(7);
∞
Hn2 H1 45 7
∑ 2 ( 2 + 2 +⋯+ 2 )=
H2 Hn
ζ(7) − ζ(2)ζ(5)
n=1
n 1 2 n 16 2
17
+ ζ(3)ζ(4);
2
∑ 2 ( 2 + 2 +⋯+ 2 )=
∞
Hn H12 H22 Hn2 93 11
ζ(7) + ζ(2)ζ(5)
n=1
n 1 2 n 8 2
51
− ζ(3)ζ(4);
4
ζ(4)
2
8 ∞ Hn H2n 64 ∞ (H2n ) 64 ∞
= ∑ ∑ ∑
H2n
+ +
5 n=1 n2 5 n=1 (2n + 1)2 5 n=1 (2n + 1)3
8 ∞ (H2n ) 2 32 ∞ Hn H2n 64 ∞
H2n
− ∑ − ∑ − log(2) ∑
5 n=1 n2 5 n=1 (2n + 1)2 5 n=1
(2n + 1)2
(2)
8 ∞ H2n
− ∑ 2 .
5 n=1 n
Extremely crazy integrals you may also find in the paper The derivation of eighteen
special challenging logarithmic integrals by Cornel Ioan Valean.
I'm sure a lot of crazy integrals you'll also meet in the sequel of the book (Almost)
Impossible Integrals, Sums, and Series since the author prepares a
continuation of this book.
Share Cite Follow edited Aug 2, 2019 at 17:35 answered Aug 2, 2019 at 17:29
user97357329
5,199 27 45
3 WOAH!! This is very impressive! I will have to buy that book! Thanks for the great answer
(+1) – clathratus Aug 2, 2019 at 17:45
Add a comment
∞ n
θ
∫ ∏ sinc dθ = π,
−∞ k=1 (2k − 1)
7
provided n ∈ 1. . . 7 ... for n ≥ 8 , it starts being < π by the most miniscule amounts!
Share Cite Follow edited Dec 8, 2018 at 3:07 answered Dec 8, 2018 at 2:42
AmbretteOrrisey
981 4 12
Really interesting! where can I learn more? – clathratus Dec 8, 2018 at 2:43
1 It's actually called the Borwein integral. I strongly recommend the works of Peter Borwein in
this connection - you'd love it! There's heaps of these crazy integrals in his works, & he's a
specialist in unlimited precision arithmetic. He has an algorithm for finding closed-form
expressions given a decimal expansion, that finds with a certain probability - rapidly
increasing with number of digits - the peak-probability closed-form ... like if you were to say
"hmmm - that looks like the square-root of ζ(3)!", or something - but systematised. And Ising
integrals ... and ... and ... ! – AmbretteOrrisey Dec 8, 2018 at 2:51
1 @Clathratus -- I presume you mean me? I like the sound of the idea! Quite likely ... if it means
I get an endless supply of the "meat that you know not of", to paraphrase a certain prophet
perched on the edge of a well in Samaria! – AmbretteOrrisey Jan 2, 2019 at 6:09
1 Use [email protected] ¶ (It's Koine Greek ... it means to which they had gone.)
– AmbretteOrrisey Jan 2, 2019 at 6:23
1 @Clathratus -- what I'll do for now, I think, is get it sorted just why that Borwein integral has
it's property - afterall, I've quoted the result without any proof! Got sufficient material on it -
and it appears within my measure. It's immediately less mysterious reflecting that the Fourier
transform of sinc is the top-hat function ... so analysing it - if you have the integral of
sinc×cos(a) (a being the radius of the top-hat) it suddenly becomes 0 the instant you have
more than a full cycle of cos inside the central 'lobe' of sinc. And that is indeed what it's
essentially about. – AmbretteOrrisey Jan 3, 2019 at 17:40
Hypergeometric function for not, thanks for the answer. – clathratus Dec 6, 2018 at 0:59
Add a comment
This might not be a difficult integral but it made me come up with a new method to
solve it so I think it's quite exotic.
4 ∞
Let’s do the general integral I(a, b) = ∫
−2 +bx 2 )
e−(ax dx
0
∞
∂2 I
=∫
−2 2
Now differentiate with respect to b x −2 x 2 e−(ax +bx ) dx
∂a∂b 0
∞
∂2 I
=∫
−2 2
e−(ax +bx ) dx
∂a∂b 0
∂2 I
=I
∂a∂b
∞
I(a, b) = ∫
−1 −√bx) 2 −2√ab
e−(√ax dx
0
∞
∫
−2√ab −1 −√bx) 2
I(a, b) = e e−(√ax dx
0
Now let’s explore more of it’s properties.One thing to note is that this integral
diverges(blows up) at b=0 but at a=0 it has a well known value. It is the Gaussian
integral so
∞
1 −−
I(0, b) = ∫ dx = √
−(bx2 ) π
e
0 2 b
The negative exponential was extracted from the integral rather than the positive one
beacause
∞
lim ∫
−2 +bx 2 )
e−(ax dx = 0
a→∞ 0
and
lim e−2√ab = 0
a→∞
So let’s assume that we assume that the solution to our PDE is of the form
∂2 I
As =I
∂a∂b
So
−−
(−√ K (b) −
−2√ab b ′ K(b)
e −− + K(b)) = e−2√ab K(b)
a 2√ab
−−
−√ K (b) −
b ′ K(b)
−− + K(b) = K(b)
a 2√ab
−−
−√ K (a) =
b ′ K(b)
−−
a 2√ab
′ K(b)
K (b) = −
2b
1 11
dK = − db
K 2b
Let’s integrate
1 1 1
∫ dK = − ∫ db
K 2 b
1
ln(K) = − ln(b) + C
2
− 12
ln(K) = ln(b )+C
1
K = eC b− 2
Let v = eC
So
1
K(b) = vb− 2
1
Thus the solution is I(a, b) = ve−2√ab b− 2
This expression diverges at b=0 which is exactly what we wanted. Now let’s determine
the constant v. As
1 −−
I(0, b) = √
π
2 b
1 −
−
So √ = vb− 2 e0 v =
π 1 √π
2 b 2
1 −
−
I(a, b) = √ e−2√ab (0 ⩽ a, b)
π
2 b
cool stuff! I really don't know anything about PDE's but this is sure exotic! Thanks for the
answer. – clathratus Dec 24, 2018 at 18:49
Add a comment
I like
⎛ ⎞
D2
+r 2
r log⎜ ⎟
2 4
Dr
+1
⎝ −1 ⎠
D 2
+r 2
∞ 4
∫ Dr
dr = π 2
D2
−∞
4
+ r2
If you make the mistake of trying to convert the log term to its series form, to attempt
to integrate term by term, this integral becomes really crazy, an infinite almost fractal
cascade of further self similar integrals with the series for π/2 gradually appearing
out of the fog
1 1 1 13 1 135
( )+ ( )+ ( ) +. . . =
π
1+
3 2 5 24 7 246 2
You miss all this underlying structure sensibly driving via the mathematical
motorway.
x+1
∞ x log π2
∫
x−1
dx =? ?
−∞ 1 + x2 2
Right! I agree through 'cheating' (evaluating it numerically) that it's so ... but I still say all that
"D" business & putting it in a perversely complex form is a total red-herring! I get how there is
a logarithmic singularity at x=±1 & how the imaginary part is an odd function between them.
– AmbretteOrrisey Dec 15, 2018 at 5:27
You can derive using partial fraction representation the general case
∞ n
(−1)k n
(−1)k ∣
= (−1) ( + ∑ ) = ∣ +∑
dx n π ∣ π
In ≡ ∫ ∣
1 x2n (1 + x2 ) 4 2k − 1 ∣4 2k − 1 ∣
k=1 k=1
∞
(−1)k
=∑
k=0 2(n + k) + 1
whence
1+1/x
∞ x log ∞
In
∫ dx = 2 ∑
1−1/x
1 1 + x2 n=0
2n + 1
=
∞ ∞
1 (−1)k
2∑ ∑
n=0
2n + 1 k=0 2(n + k) + 1
Likewise for the integral from 0 to 1 ... substitute x = 1/y & limits from 1 to ∞ & we get a
similar series that begins at n = 1 ∴ with I1 in the numerator & 2n − 1 in the denominator.
So we get
∞ x log ( x+1 )
∫
x−1
0 1 + x2
=
∞ ∞
π n (−1)k
+ 2∑ ∑
2 n=1 n −
2 1 2(n + k) + 1
4 k=0
π2
,
4
whence the integral over (−∞, ∞) is π 2 /2 . So we could numerically verify that
∞ ∞
n (−1)k π
∑ ∑ = (π − 2).
n=1 n2 − 1 2(n + k) + 1 8
4 k=0
Just one last thing, and then I'm through - as this is only taking delight in seeing explicitly
how the series all pan-out & fit together, really - I'm sure the proper way to do it is something
like Feynmann's trick or a contour integral, or whatever... but the value of the integral is
π²/2 ... did you not put that in the first place & then edit it!? I'm almost sure you did.
– AmbretteOrrisey Dec 15, 2018 at 9:20
@AmbretteOrrisey: The origin of this is an attempt to derive Coulombs law in a different way
that is off-topic here. The physical integral is between 0 and ∞ , so was equal to π 2 /2 . D is
the charge separation. At the heart of my attempt at a physical model I ended up with a final
integral that is independent of D (the charge separation) which you have investigated in your
comments. Physically the integral can be simplified because you can move the origin of the
original volume integral from halfway between the charges to co-locate with one of the
charges. – James Arathoon Dec 15, 2018 at 16:24
We have
1
∫
2
0 x[2 F1 ( 12 , 1; 2; x)] dx = 12 − 16 ln 2,
0
1
27
∫
3
x[2 F1 ( 13 , 23 ; 32 ; x)] dx = ,
0 32
1
1792
∫
4
x[3 F2 ( 14 , 12 , 34 ; 23 , 43 ; x)] dx = ,
0 2187
and
1 1 1
dtdxdz
∫ ∫ ∫ 1/2(1 − x)1/2 t1/4 (1 − t)5/12 (1 − txz)1/4
0 0 0 x
29/4 ⋅ 11√−
1
π Γ( 3 ) −−–−−−−
=
19/8 1
√√3 − 1,
3 Γ( 4 )
∞
1 π2
∫ {x − log(2 sinh x)} cos (x)dx = [ + π coth π − 1] 2
0 8 3
Share Cite Follow edited Jun 1 at 20:00 answered Dec 8, 2020 at 3:39
clathratus
16.8k 3 24 74
Add a comment
My favorite is:
step 1: do u = 1/x t
step 3: split integral from [1, ∞) to ∑(n = 1 -> inf) (∫[n, n+1])
xn+1
step 5: the remaining integrals are easy, use ∫ x n dx = n+1
please format your answer using MathJax, it is near impossible to understand in its current
format – clathratus May 4 at 17:58
Add a comment
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged integration
MATHEMATICS COMPANY STACK EXCHANGE NETWORK Blog Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram