MTP Unit-4
MTP Unit-4
Meaning of Directing
Directing is defined as that management function that provides the guidance and direction to
the employees of the organisation that enables them to perform effectively and efficiently for
the development of the organisation.
Elements of Directing
Directing as a management function comprises the following elements.
1. Communication
2. Supervision
3. Motivation
4. Leadership
Communication: Communication is one of the most basic functions of management, it is the
process by which a piece of information is transferred from one person to another in an
organisation.
The purpose of communication in an organisation is to send across any set of instructions,
orders or information related to the improvement of the operational efficiency.
Communication can always be two sided, where the flow of information is from supervisor to
subordinates and vice versa.
Supervision: Supervision is the next step after information is conveyed by the supervisor to
the employees regarding the work that needs to be done. It is that stage where the supervisor
oversees if the subordinates are following what has been instructed to them.
Managers act as supervisors and they ensure that the work is going as per their instructions. It
is the duty of a supervisor to make sure that all instructions are properly followed and the
subordinates are doing as they are instructed.
Supervisors act as problem solvers of the subordinates regarding any issues with the
instructions or the process.
Motivation: Motivation is one of the key elements of directing. Issuing of order to the
subordinates by the supervisor does not guarantee that it will be followed exactly as was asked
for.
For getting the desired outcome, the employees need to be motivated by the managers which
leads to the task being completed efficiently. Motivation is a force that makes an individual
perform to the best of his abilities in order to complete a set of tasks or instructions.
Motivation can be in the form of monetary gains such as incentives or bonus, it can be non-
monetary such as appreciation or growth.
Leadership: Leadership is that element of directing that involves motivation and persuasion
in order to achieve the desired goals. A leader is defined as a person who is able to influence
other people and inspires them to follow the instructions provided.
Leadership may be defined as the process of influencing the behaviour of people by
making them strive voluntarily towards the achievement of goals.
Communication Process
The communication is a dynamic process that begins with the
conceptualizing of ideas by the sender who then transmits the message
through a channel to the receiver, who in turn gives the feedback in the form
of some message or signal within the given time frame. Thus, there are
Seven major elements of communication process:
1. Sender: The sender or the communicator is the person who initiates
the conversation and has conceptualized the idea that he intends to
convey it to others.
2. Encoding: The sender begins with the encoding process wherein he
uses certain words or non-verbal methods such as symbols, signs,
body gestures, etc. to translate the information into a message. The
sender’s knowledge, skills, perception, background, competencies,
etc. has a great impact on the success of the message.
3. Message: Once the encoding is finished, the sender gets the
message that he intends to convey. The message can be written, oral,
symbolic or non-verbal such as body gestures, silence, sighs, sounds,
etc. or any other signal that triggers the response of a receiver.
4. Communication Channel: The Sender chooses the medium through
which he wants to convey his message to the recipient. It must be
selected carefully in order to make the message effective and correctly
interpreted by the recipient. The choice of medium depends on the
interpersonal relationships between the sender and the receiver and
also on the urgency of the message being sent. Oral, virtual, written,
sound, gesture, etc. are some of the commonly used communication
mediums.
5. Receiver: The receiver is the person for whom the message is
intended or targeted. He tries to comprehend it in the best possible
manner such that the communication objective is attained. The degree
to which the receiver decodes the message depends on his knowledge
of the subject matter, experience, trust and relationship with the
sender.
6. Decoding: Here, the receiver interprets the sender’s message and
tries to understand it in the best possible manner. An effective
communication occurs only if the receiver understands the message
in exactly the same way as it was intended by the sender.
7. Feedback: The Feedback is the final step of the process that ensures
the receiver has received the message and interpreted it correctly as
it was intended by the sender. It increases the effectiveness of the
communication as it permits the sender to know the efficacy of his
message. The response of the receiver can be verbal or non-verbal.
Note: The Noise shows the barriers in communications. There are chances
when the message sent by the sender is not received by the recipient.
Types of Communication
Formal Communication
Formal communication is a flow of information through formally established channels
in an organization. These type of communication may be oral or written.
• Mostly controlled by managers
• It is hierarchical in nature and associated with the superior and subordinate
relationship
• Generally linked with formal status and positions of a person
• It may be upward, downward and horizontal.
Advantages of formal communication
• Follows the principle of unity of command
• The orderly flow of information and systematic
• Helps in fixing responsibilities for better efficiency
• Managers have full control of nature and direction of communication
• Helps in maintaining authority relationship
• The flow of instruction is very specific, clear and definite.
• Helpful in maintaining direct contact with subordinates.
Disadvantage of formal communication
• It is a time-consuming process
• It lacks personal contacts and relationship
• It may be resisted and distorted
• It delays the communication message due to the formal procedure
• It obstructs the free, smooth and accurate circulation of information
Informal Communication
Informal Communication refers to communication on the basis of personal relations. It
is a type of communication which is unstructured, unofficial and unplanned.
• It does not follow the formal channels established by the management
• It often flows between friends and intimates and related to personal rather than
‘positional’ matters.
• It cannot be demonstrated on the chart and not regulated by formal rules and
procedure.
The informal communication system is built around the social relationship of the members of
the organisation Herbert Simon
Informal communication is a result of social interaction and satisfies the natural desire
of people to communicate with each other. Informal communication is helpful in
countering the effects of work fatigue and monotony and serving as a source of job-
related information.
Downward Communication
Communication that takes place from superiors to subordinates in a chain of command
is known as downward communication.
Such type of communication may be in the form of orders, instructions, policies,
programmes etc. It may be written or verbal.
The following messages are induced in this type of communication:
• Confirmation regarding performance
• Work assignment and directions
• Orders, guidance and responsibilities
• Ideological type of information
• Organisation Procedure and practices.
Advantages of downward communication
• It is helpful in controlling the subordinate
• It explains the plans and policies of the organisation to employees.
• It is a tool to delegate authority
• It is helpful to tie among employees at a different level
• It encourages the effectiveness of upward communication through feedback
• It helps in preparing the people to introduce change
Disadvantages of downward communication
• It tends to promote one-way communication
• It is time-consuming because information passes through various levels
• Sometimes a manager may filter the information or hold back some of the
information due to fear that it might be unpalatable
• As communication takes time, sometimes message become ineffective and can
lose significance
Upward Communication
When message are transmitted from bottom to top of the organisational hierarchy, it
is known as upward communication.
The main function of upward communication is to supply information to top
management. It is essentially participative in nature and can flourish only in a
democratic organisational environment. It may be in the form of progress report,
suggestions, grievances, complaints etc.
Diagonal Communication
Diagonal communication is an exchange of information between the persons at a
different level across departmental lines.
This type of communication is used to spread information at different levels of an
organization to improve understanding and co-ordination so as to achieve
organisational objectives.
Thus, where the persons who are neither working in the same department nor has
similar level are communicating, it is said to be diagonal communication. It cuts across
the levels of organisational structure.
It may also be in the form of informal conversation, group discussions, meeting etc. It
is a more effective means of exchange of information because the receiver not only
hears the message but also observes the physical gestures of the speaker.
PERSONAL BARRIERS:
Challenges in channel:
17. Faulty equipment
18. Noise in channel
Organisational barriers:
19. Tall organisation structure
20. Too much reliance on formal channel
21. Status difference
The organizational hierarchy pose another barrier to communication within
organization,
especially when the communication is between employee and manager. This is so
because the employee is dependent on the manager as the primary link to the
organization and hence more likely to distort upward communication than either
horizontal or downward communication.
Leadership:
Leadership is that element of directing that involves motivation and persuasion in order to
achieve the desired goals. A leader is defined as a person who is able to influence other people
and inspires them to follow the instructions provided.
In other words, leadership is the act of inspiring leading, guiding and motivating the
subordinates to achieve the organisational goals.
2. Confidence
3. Inspire Others
Probably the most difficult job for a leader is to persuade others to follow.
It can only be possible if you inspire your followers by setting a good
example. When the going gets tough, they look up to you and see how
you react to the situation. If you handle it well, they will follow you. As a
leader, should think positive and this positive approach should be visible
through your actions. Stay calm under pressure and keep the motivation
level up. As John Quincy Adams puts it, “If your actions inspire others
to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a
leader.” If you are successful in inspiring your subordinates, you can
easily overcome any current and future challenge easily.
Your teams look up to you and if you want them to give them their all, you
will have to be passionate about it too. When your teammates see you
getting your hands dirty, they will also give their best shot. It will also help
you to gain the respect of your subordinates and infuse new energy in
your team members, which helps them to perform better. If they feel that
you are not fully committed or lacks passion, then it would be an uphill
task for the leader to motivate your followers to achieve the goal.
5. Good Communicator
Until you clearly communicate your vision to your team and tell them the
strategy to achieve the goal, it will be very difficult for you to get the results
you want. Simply put, if you are unable to communicate your message
effectively to your team, you can never be a good leader. A good
communicator can be a good leader. Words have the power to motivate
people and make them do the unthinkable. If you use them effectively,
you can also achieve better results.
6. Decision-Making Capabilities
Apart from having a futuristic vision, a leader should have the ability to
take the right decision at the right time. Decisions taken by leaders have
a profound impact on masses. A leader should think long and hard before
taking a decision but once the decision is taken, stand by it. Although,
most leaders take decisions on their own, but it is highly recommended
that you consult key stakeholders before taking a decision. After all, they
are the ones who The 34th President of United States,
Dwight.D.Eisenhower once said, or suffer from your decisions.
7. Accountability
Last but certainly not the least, is empathy. Leaders should develop
empathy with their followers. Unfortunately, most leaders follow a
dictatorial style and neglect empathy altogether. Due to this, they fail to
make a closer connection with their followers. Understanding the
problems of your followers and feeling their pain is the first step to become
an effective leader. Even that is not enough until you work hard and
provide your followers with the suitable solution to their problems.
11.Resilience
When the going gets tough, the tough gets going. You might have heard
this adage many times, but did you know that great leaders also follow
this rule. They are resilient and have a positive attitude. Irrespective of
how difficult the circumstances might be, you will find them rallying their
followers. While most people are busy in complaining about the problems,
great leaders always focus on solutions, not the problems.
Good leaders always have higher influence but how do they increase their
influence on the point where people accept what they say. They do this
by connecting with people emotionally. That is where emotional
intelligence comes into play.
13. Humility
How would you feel when you are promoted to leadership status? You will
feel proud. A good leader is always selfless and always think about his or
her followers. That is why the leadership styles most great leaders adopt
put lots of emphasis on problem-solving and team dynamics instead of
focusing on self-promotion.
14. Transparency
One of the best ways to win the trust of your followers is by being
transparent. Instead of hiding information, you should openly share it with
them. By giving visibility to your followers, they will buy into your vision
and support you with conviction in achieving the goal. More importantly, it
gives your followers clarity, autonomy and make them feel more
empowered while keeping them engaged.
Good leaders always have a vision and purpose. They not only visualize
the future themselves but also share their vision with their followers. When
their followers were able to see the big picture, they can see where they
are heading. A great leader goes above and beyond and explain why they
are moving in the direction they are moving and shares the strategy and
action plan to achieve that goal.
A leadership style is a leader's method of providing direction, implementing plans, and motivating
people. Various authors have proposed identifying many different leadership styles as exhibited
by leaders in the political, business or other fields.
8 leadership styles:
1. Transactional Leadership
2. Autocratic Leadership
3. Transformational Leadership
4. Servant Leadership
5. Charismatic Leadership
6. Democratic Leadership or Participative Leadership
7. Laissez-Faire Leadership
8. Bureaucratic Leadership
1. Transactional Leadership
Transactional is a term used to classify a group of leadership theories that inquire the
interactions between leaders and followers. This style of leadership starts with the
premise that team members agree to obey their leader totally when they take a job
on. The “transaction” is usually that the organization pays the team members, in return
for their effort and compliance. As such, the leader has the right to “punish” team
members if their work doesn’t meet the pre-determined standard. Team members can
do little to improve their job satisfaction under transactional leadership. The leader
could give team members some control of their income/reward by using incentives
that encourage even higher standards or greater productivity. Alternatively a
transactional leader could practice “management by exception”, whereby, rather than
rewarding better work, he or she would take corrective action if the required standards
were not met.
Transactional leadership is really just a way of managing rather a true leadership style, as the focus is
on short-term tasks. It has serious limitations for knowledge-based or creative work, but remains a
common style in many organizations.
2. Autocratic Leadership
Under the autocratic leadership styles, all decision-making powers are centralized in
the leader as shown such leaders are dictators. Autocratic leadership is an extreme
form of transactional leadership, where a leader exerts high levels of power over his or
her employees or team members. People within the team are given few opportunities
for making suggestions, even if these would be in the team’s or organization’s interest.
Autocratic leadership style is often considered the classical approach. It is one in which
the manager retains as much power and decision-making authority as possible. The
manager does not consult employees, nor are they allowed to give any input.
Employees are expected to obey orders without receiving any explanations. The
motivation environment is produced by creating a structured set of rewards and
punishments. Autocratic leaders make decisions without consulting their teams. This
is considered appropriate when decisions genuinely need to be taken quickly, when
there’s no need for input, and when team agreement isn’t necessary for a successful
outcome.
Many people resent being treated like this. Because of this, autocratic leadership often
leads to high levels of absenteeism and staff turnover. Also, the team’s output does
not benefit from the creativity and experience of all team members, so many of the
benefits of teamwork are lost.
For some routine and unskilled jobs, however, this style can remain effective, where
the advantages of control outweigh the disadvantages.
3.Transformational Leadership
4. Servant Leadership
This term, coined by Robert Greenleaf in the 1970s, describes a leader who is often not
formally recognized as such. When someone, at any level within an organization, leads
simply by virtue of meeting the needs of his or her team, he or she is described as a
“servant leader”. Servant Leadership’s focus was on the leader as a servant, with his or
her key role being in developing, enabling and supporting team members, helping
them fully develop their potential and deliver their best. In many ways, servant
leadership is a form of democratic leadership, as the whole team tends to be involved
in decision-making.
5. Charismatic Leadership
The Charismatic Leader and the Transformational Leader can have many similarities, in
that the Transformational Leader may well be charismatic. Their main difference is in
their basic focus. Whereas the Transformational Leader has a basic focus of
transforming the organization and, quite possibly, their followers, the Charismatic
Leader may not want to change anything. A charismatic leadership style can appear
similar to a transformational leadership style, in that the leader injects huge doses of
enthusiasm into his or her team, and is very energetic in driving others forward.
However, charismatic leaders can tend to believe more in themselves than in their
teams. This can create a risk that a project, or even an entire organization, might
collapse if the leader were to leave because in the eyes of their followers, success is
tied up with the presence of the charismatic leader. As such, charismatic leadership
carries great responsibility, and needs long-term commitment from the leader.
Although a democratic leader will make the final decision, he or she invites other
members of the team to contribute to the decision-making process. This not only
increases job satisfaction by involving employees or team members in what’s going
on, but it also helps to develop people’s skills. Employees and team members feel in
control of their own destiny, and so are motivated to work hard by more than just a
financial reward. Democratic leadership can produce high quantity work for long
periods of time. Many employees like the trust they receive and respond with
cooperation, team spirit, and high morale.
As participation takes time, this style can lead to things happening more slowly than
an autocratic approach, but often the end result is better. It can be most suitable where
team working is essential, and where quality is more important than speed to market
or productivity.
7. Laissez-Faire Leadership
The laissez-faire leadership style is also known as the “hands-off ¨ style. It is one in
which the manager provides little or no direction and gives employees as much
freedom as possible. All authority or power is given to the employees and they must
determine goals, make decisions, and resolve problems on their own.
This French phrase means “leave it be” and is used to describe a leader who leaves his
or her colleagues to get on with their work. It can be effective if the leader monitors
what is being achieved and communicates this back to his or her team regularly. Most
often, laissez-faire leadership works for teams in which the individuals are very
experienced and skilled self-starters. Unfortunately, it can also refer to situations where
managers are not exerting sufficient control. The advantage of this kind of style is
positive only in the case when the employees are very responsible and in case of
creative jobs where a person is guided by his own aspirations. In these cases, less
direction is required so this style can be good. This style has more disadvantages
because usually it is the result of the lack of interest of the leader that leads to his
adopting this style. It proves poor management and makes the employees lose their
sense of direction and focus. The disinterest of the management and leadership causes
the employees to become less interested in their job and their dissatisfaction increases.
8. Bureaucratic Leadership
In other situations, the inflexibility and high levels of control exerted can demoralize
staff, and can diminish the organization’s ability to react to changing external
circumstances.
CO-ORDINATION
• It is relevant for group efforts and not for individual efforts. Coordination
involves an orderly pattern of group efforts. In the case of individual
efforts, since the performance of the individual does not affect the
functioning of others, the need for coordination does not arise.
Internal Coordination
Internal coordination is all about establishing a relationship between all
the managers, executives, departments, divisions, branches, and employees or
workers. These relationships are established with a view to coordinate the
activities of the organization. Internal coordination has two groups:
External Coordination
As the name suggests, external coordination is all about establishing a relationship
between the employees of the organization and people outside it.
PURPOSE OF COORDINATION
➢ Unity of Action
o Enterprise has diverse resources, technique, activities etc,
and these all must be in coordination so that there is unity in
action.
➢ Increase in Efficiency and Economy
o Coordination brings efficiency in the departments as it is an
effort of all organizational members to maintain good
relations among all the levels of organization
➢ Survival of the Organization
o Coordination helps to harmonize the work resources which
helps in the survival of the organization.
➢ End of Conflicts
o Many conflicts and rivalries between individuals, in between
departments, and also between a line and staff gets ended due
to the coordination among the departments.
➢ Optimum Utilization of Resources
o In particular, coordination ensures that employees do not
participate in the work of various purposes as it integrates
human resources and organizational resources together.
Therefore, there is little waste of resources that help the
organization to use them effectively.
➢ Growth in size As the organisations grow in size, the number of people in the
organisation increase. Different individuals have different objectives. Coordination is
needed to integrate diverse individual objectives with organisational objectives.
➢ Functional differentiation Different departments in the organisation have their own set
of objectives, policies, etc. This creates conflicting situations many a times.
Coordination seeks to intergrate the efforts and activities of various departments.