WC Module 2
WC Module 2
Dr.K.Krishna Naik
Assistant Professor
Syllabus
Capacity of Wireless Channels:
Radio Wave Propagation,
Transmit and Receive Signal Models,
Free-Space Path Loss,
Indoor Attenuation Factors,
Simplified Path-Loss Model,
Shadow Fading,
Combined Path Loss and Shadowing,
Outage Probability under Path Loss and Shadowing,
Cell Coverage Area,
Capacity in AWGN,
Capacity of Flat Fading Channels,
Channel and System Model,
Channel Distribution Information Known,
Channel Side Information at Receiver,
Channel Side Information at Transmitter and Receiver,
Capacity with Receiver Diversity,
Capacity Comparisons,
Capacity of Frequency-Selective Fading Channels,
Time-Invariant Channels, Time-Varying Channels.
Channel Nature
The wireless/radio channel poses a severe challenge as a medium for
reliable high-speed communication.
Not only is it susceptible to noise, interference, and other channel
impediments, but these impediments change over time in unpredictable
ways as a result of user movement and environment dynamics.
we characterize the variation in received signal power over distance due
to path loss and shadowing.
Path loss is caused by dissipation of the power radiated by the transmitter as well as by
effects of the propagation channel.
Path-loss models generally assume that path loss is the same at a given transmit–
receive distance (assuming that the path-loss model does not include shadowing
effects).
Shadowing is caused by obstacles between the transmitter and receiver
that attenuate signal power through absorption, reflection, scattering, and
diffraction.
When the attenuation is strong, the signal is blocked.
Received power variation due to path loss occurs over long distances (100–1000 m),
whereas variation due to shadowing occurs over distances that are proportional to the
Propagation Effects.
The variations in received power due to path loss and shadowing
occur over relatively large distances, these variations are
sometimes referred to as large-scale propagation effects.
These variations occur over very short distances, on the order of
the signal wavelength, and so are sometimes referred to as
small-scale propagation effects.
The variations can be roughly divided into two types:
Large-scale fading, due to path loss of signal as a function of distance and
shadowing by large objects such as buildings and hills. This occurs as the
mobile moves through a distance of the order of the cell size, and is
typically frequency independent.
Small-scale fading, due to the constructive and destructive interference of
the multiple signal paths between the transmitter and receiver. This
occurs at the spatial scale of the order of the carrier wavelength, and is
frequency dependent.
Large
Small
where n(t) is the noise process introduced by the channel and the
equivalent lowpass signal v(t) depends on the channel through which
s(t) propagates.
if s(t) is transmitted through a time-invariant channel then
v(t) = u(t) ∗ c(t),
where c(t) is the equivalent lowpass channel impulse response for the channel.
The received signal consists of two terms, the first term corresponding
to the transmitted signal after propagation through the channel, and
the second term corresponding to the noise added by the channel.
The signal-to-noise power ratio (SNR) of the received signal is defined as
the power of the first term divided by the power of the second
term.
Transmit and Receive Signal Models
When the transmitter or receiver is moving, the received signal will have
a Doppler shift of f D = v cos θ/λ associated with it,
where θ is the arrival angle of the received signal relative to the direction of motion,
v is the receiver velocity toward the transmitter in the direction of motion, and
λ = c/fc is the signal wavelength (c = 3 · 108 m/s is the speed of light).
The Doppler shift results from the fact that transmitter or receiver
movement over a short time interval t causes a slight change in
distance Δd = v Δt cos θ that the transmitted signal needs to travel to
the receiver.
The phase change due to this path-length difference is Δφ = 2πv Δt cos
θ/λ.
The Doppler frequency is then obtained from the relationship between
signal frequency and phase:
We define the path loss of the channel as the value of the linear path
loss in decibels or, equivalently, the difference in dB between the
transmitted and received signal power:
Where √Gl is the product of the transmit and receive antenna field
radiation patterns in the LOS direction.
The phase shift e −j2πd/λ is due to the distance d that the wave travels.
The power in the transmitted signal s(t) is Pt, so the ratio of received to
transmitted power.
Free-Space Path Loss
Thus, the received signal power falls off in inverse proportion to the
square of the distance d between the transmit and receive antennas.
The received signal power is also proportional to the square of the signal
wavelength, so as the carrier frequency increases the received power
decreases.
This dependence of received power on the signal wavelength λ is due to
the effective area of the receive antenna
However, directional antennas can be designed so that receive power is
an increasing function of frequency for highly directional links.
The received power can be expressed in dBm as
Indoor Attenuation Factors
Indoor environments differ widely in the materials used for walls and floors, the
layout of rooms, hallways, windows, and open areas, the location and material in
obstructing objects, the size of each room, and the number of floors.
All of these factors have a significant impact on path loss in an indoor
environment.
Thus, it is difficult to find generic models that can be accurately applied to
determine empirical path loss in a specific indoor setting.
Indoor path-loss models must accurately capture the effects of attenuation across
floors due to partitions as well as between floors.
Measurements across a wide range of building characteristics and signal
frequencies indicate that the attenuation per floor is greatest for the first floor that
is passed through and decreases with each subsequent floor.
Specifically, at 900 MHz, the attenuation when transmitter and receiver are
separated by a single floor ranges from 10–20 dB, while subsequent attenuation is
6–10 dB per floor for the next three floors and then a few decibels per floor for
more than four floors.
At higher frequencies the attenuation loss per floor is typically larger.
The attenuation per floor is thought to decrease as the number of attenuating
floors increases because of the scattering up the side of the building and
reflections from adjacent buildings.
The experimental data for floor and partition loss can be added to an
analytical or empirical dB path-loss model PL(d ) as
where FAFi represents the floor attenuation factor for the ith floor
traversed by the signal
PAFi represents the partition attenuation factor associated with the ith
partition traversed by the signal.
The number of floors and partitions traversed by the signal are Nf and
Np, respectively.
Simplified Path-Loss Model
The complexity of signal propagation makes it difficult to obtain a single model
that characterizes path loss accurately across a range of different environments.
Accurate path-loss models can be obtained from complex analytical models or
empirical measurements when tight system specifications must be met or the
best locations for base stations or access-point layouts must be determined.
However, for general trade-off analysis of various system designs it is sometimes
best to use a simple model that captures the essence of signal propagation
without resorting to complicated path-loss models, which are only
approximations to the real channel anyway.
Thus, the following simplified model for path loss as a function of distance is
commonly used for system design:
The values for K, d0,
and γ can be obtained
to approximate either
an analytical or
empirical model
The conversion from the linear mean (in dB) to the log mean (in dB) is as
where ψdB is a Gauss-distributed random variable with mean zero and variance
σ2ψdB .
Outage Probability under Path Loss and
Shadowing
The combined effects of path loss and shadowing have important
implications for wireless system design.
In wireless systems there is typically a target minimum received power
level Pmin below which performance becomes unacceptable (e.g., the voice
quality in a cellular system becomes too poor to understand).
However, with shadowing the received power at any given distance from
the transmitter is log-normally distributed with some probability of falling
below Pmin.
We define outage probability Pout(Pmin, d) under path loss and shadowing
to be the probability that the received power at a given distance d, Pr(d ),
falls below
Pmin: Pout(Pmin, d) = p(Pr(d) < Pmin).
For the combined path-loss and shadowing model
Cell Coverage Area
The cell coverage area in a cellular system is defined as the expected
percentage of locations within a cell where the received power at these
locations is above a given minimum.
Consider a base station inside a circular cell of a given radius R.
All mobiles within the cell require some minimum received SNR for
acceptable performance.
Assuming a given model for noise, the SNR requirement translates to a
minimum received power Pmin throughout the cell.
The transmit power at the base station is designed for an average
received power at the cell boundary of PR, averaged over the shadowing
variations.
However, shadowing will cause some locations within the cell to have
received power below PR, and others will have received power exceeding
PR.
Cell Coverage should be depend upon the following:
Path Loss
Shadowing
Outage Probability
Cellular Mobile Communications
The Cellular Approach
Divides the Entire Service Area into Several Small Cells
Reuse the Frequency
Basic Components of a Cellular Telephone System
Cellular Mobile Phone: A light-weight hand-held set which is an
outcome of the marriage of Graham Bell’s Plain Old Telephone
Technology [1876] and Marconi’s Radio Technology [1894] [although a
very late delivery but very cute]
Base Station: A Low Power Transmitter, other Radio Equipment
[Transceivers] plus a small Tower
Mobile Switching Center [MSC] /Mobile Telephone Switching
Office[MTSO]
An Interface between Base Stations and the PSTN
Controls all the Base Stations in the Region and Processes User ID
and other Call Parameters
A typical MSC can handle up to 100,000+ Mobiles, and 5000+
Simultaneous Calls
Handles Handoff Requests, Call Initiation Requests, and all Billing &
System Maintenance Functions
Cellular Mobile Communication
Telecom spectrum policy in India
In India GSM technology works in the frequency bands of 900 and 1800 MHz
and CDMA technology works in the 800 MHz band.
Presently, 100 MHz spectrum is earmarked for GSM services and 20 MHz is
earmarked for CDMA.
Out of this 65 MHz of GSM band is still with Defence forces.
The minimum amount of spectrum required for launching GSM services is 4.4
MHz.
In 2002, the government introduced a subscriber linked spectrum allocation
process, which provided for a maximum allotment of 12.5 MHz of spectrum
per operator in each service area.
The initial allotment of spectrum along with the licence was 4.4 MHz for GSM
and 2.5 MHz for CDMA.
This could be further scaled up to 6.2 MHz for GSM and 5 MHz for CDMA
operators depending on availability and the operator’s ability to justify the need
for it.
Cellular Systems
The cellular concept was a major breakthrough in solving the problem of
spectral congestion and user capacity.
It offered very high capacity in a limited spectrum allocation without any major
technological changes.
The cellular concept has the following system level ideas
RF spectrum is a valuable and scarce commodity
Cellular network divides coverage area into cells, each served by its own
base station transceiver and antenna
Low (er) power transmitters, transmission range determines cell boundary,
Replacing a single, high power transmitter with many low power transmitters,
each providing coverage to only a small area.
Cells separated by a sufficiently large distance to avoid mutual interference
can be assigned the same channel group among co-channel cells, RF
spectrum divided into distinct groups of channels, Adjacent cells are (usually)
assigned different channel groups to avoid interference
Neighboring cells are assigned different groups of channels in order to
minimize interference. The same set of channels is then reused at different
geographical locations.
Frequency reuse
When designing a cellular mobile communication system, it is
important to provide good coverage and services in a high
user-density area.
Reuse can be done once the total interference from all users
in the cells using the same frequency (co-channel cell) for
transmission suffers from sufficient attenuation. Factors need
to be considered include:
Geographical separation (path loss)
Shadowing effect
A cellular system which has a total of S duplex channels.
S channels are divided among N cells, with each cell uses unique and disjoint
channels.
If each cell is allocated a group of k channels, then
S=kN.
Frequency Reuse Factor
The band of frequency allocated for cellular system use can be reused with
different CLUSTERS. We mean by cluster here the configuration of cells over
which the complete frequency band is divided and this configuration of cells is
repeater over and over.
The frequency reuse factor is defined as 1 over the number of cells in the
cluster of the system. Valid clusters are those that result in N cells with the
same frequency of a particular cell located at equal distance from it.
Reusing frequencies by dividing the allocated band by a specific integer number
of cells and assigning each cell one division and then repeating the assignment
over and over produces a tradeoff between network capacity and reception
quality as follows:
The higher the number of divisions of the spectrum over cells (higher cell‐reuse
factor), the lower the capacity of the network but the further away cells with
similar frequency allocations are located resulting in lower interference.
The lower the number of divisions of the spectrum over cells (Lower cell‐reuse
factor), the higher the capacity of the network but the closer cells with similar
frequency allocations are located resulting in higher interference.
Frequency Allocation Concepts
• Assume that the total frequency band allocated for a cellular system is
B Hz, and that each half‐duplex channel requires W Hz, the number of
full‐duplex channels S that the total band supports (one channel for
transmission and one for reception) is: S=B/2W
• Each cell is allocated a group of k channels, k S .
• The S channels are divided among N cells. The total number of
available radio channels S kN
• The N cells which use the complete set of channels is called cluster.
• The cluster can be repeated M times within the system.
• The total number of channels, C, is used as a measure of capacity
C MkN MS
• The capacity is directly proportional to the number of replication M.
• Small N is desirable to maximize capacity.
• The frequency reuse factor is given by 1/ N
Possible Cluster Sizes
• Hexagonal geometry has
– exactly six equidistance neighbors
– the lines joining the centers of any cell and each of its neighbors are
separated by multiples of 60 degrees.
• Only certain cluster sizes and cell layout are possible.
• The number of cells per cluster, N, can only have values which satisfy
N i 2 ij j 2
• Co-channel neighbors of a particular cell, ex, i=3 and j=2.
Where
Q= D/R
Co-Channel Interference and System
Capacity
Computation of Co-Channel Interference
in Different Configurations
To compute the Forward channel SIR, we use equation (PR) to compute the Signal
power and again use equation (PR) to compute the Interference power as follows
The performance of a system is usually measured in terms of the minimum SIR, which
occurs at the corners of the cell providing service to the mobile station.
The distance in this worst case of serving tower to the mobile station is R while the
distance from the co‐channel cell towers to the mobile station are obtained by finding
the Cartesian distances of the co‐channel cell tower coordinates
Designing a cellular system
The cluster size must satisfy: N = i2 + ij + j2 where i, j are
non-negative integers.
Filling
Frequency Selective Channel
Capacity
Water Filling over the Frequency
Spectrum
Books
1. Andrea Goldsmith, “Wireless Communications”,
Cambridge University Press, 2005.
2. T.S. Rappaport, “Wireless Communications,
Principles and Practice”, 2nd Ed., Pearson
Education, 2002.
3. Vijay K. Garg, “Wireless Communications and
Networking”, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
(Elsevier), 2007.
4. Aditya Jagannatham, Principles of Modern
Wireless Communication Systems, McGraw
Hill, 2016.
5. David Tse, Pramod Viswanath, “Fundamentals of
Wireless Communication”, Cambridge
University Press, 2005.