LEA 2 Competency 4
LEA 2 Competency 4
Define and examine the Philippine policing, extradition treaty, and the international
agreement on law enforcement cooperation.
(PRB Res. No. 05 s. 2022)
PHILIPPINE POLICING, EXTRADITION TREATY, AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS ON LAW ENFORCEMENT COOPER
ATION
Treaty is an international agreement between sovereign states that is governed by international law. It is typically
written, but it can also be concluded through other means. Treaties can take various forms and serve a wide range of
purposes, such as establishing diplomatic relations, defining boundaries, regulating trade, or addressing human rights
issues.
The Philippines has been a party to numerous international treaties and agreements over the years. Here are a few
examples of cases where treaties have been applied in the Philippines:
1. Mutual Defense Treaty with the United States: The Mutual Defense Treaty between the United States and the
Philippines, signed in 1951, has been applied in various instances, particularly during times of regional security
concerns. It is aimed at ensuring the mutual defense and security of both countries. The treaty played a
significant role during the Cold War and continues to be relevant in the context of regional security issues.
2. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS): The Philippines has used UNCLOS to assert its rights
and claims in the South China Sea. In 2016, the Philippines won a landmark case against China at the Permanent
Court of Arbitration in The Hague, Netherlands, based on UNCLOS, regarding territorial and maritime disputes in
the South China Sea.
3. Paris Agreement on Climate Change: The Philippines is a signatory to the Paris Agreement, an international
treaty aimed at addressing climate change. The country has been involved in implementing measures to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change as part of its commitment under the
agreement.
4. International Human Rights Treaties: The Philippines is a party to various international human rights treaties,
such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). These treaties influence the country's domestic laws and policies
related to human rights.
5. ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA): The Philippines, as a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN), is part of various regional agreements, including AFTA, which aims to promote economic integration
and free trade within the ASEAN region. These agreements have had an impact on the country's trade and
economic policies.
Extradition is a legal process through which one country (the requesting state) formally requests the surrender of an
individual accused or convicted of a crime who is currently in another country (the requested state). Extradition
agreements are established through treaties, and they outline the procedures and conditions under which such transfers
of individuals can occur.
Here are some notable cases where extradition has been applied in the Philippines:
1. Mark Jimenez: Mark Jimenez, a former Philippine congressman, was wanted by the United States for various
charges, including campaign finance violations and tax evasion. He was arrested in the Philippines in 2001 and
faced extradition proceedings. In 2002, the Philippine government approved his extradition to the United States,
and he was subsequently extradited to face trial.
2. Jan Schneider: Jan Schneider, a German national, was arrested in the Philippines in 2016 and faced extradition to
Germany. He was accused of kidnapping his own children and taking them to the Philippines without the
consent of his former spouse. The extradition request was granted, and he was returned to Germany to face
legal proceedings.
3. Manuel Noriega: Although not a Philippine citizen, the case of Manuel Noriega, the former Panamanian dictator,
involved the Philippines. Noriega sought asylum at the Papal Nunciature in Panama City but later surrendered to
the United States military. He was eventually transported to the United States, where he faced drug trafficking
charges. The Philippines played a role in the process of transferring Noriega from Panama to the United States.
4. Xie Liping, a Chinese national wanted for embezzlement and fraud charges in China, was arrested in the
Philippines in 2013. Her extradition was requested by the Chinese government. After a lengthy legal process, the
Philippines approved her extradition in 2016, and she was sent back to China to face charges.
5. Romuald S. Lipinski: A Polish national, was arrested in the Philippines in 2015. He faced extradition to Poland for
charges related to financial crimes and fraud. The Philippine government approved his extradition, and he was
sent to Poland to stand trial.
Distinguish extradition from deportation
EXTRADITION DEPORTATION
Effected at the request of the State of Origin Unilateral act of a local State
Based on offenses committed in the State of Based on causes arising in the local State (factors
origin (criminal offenses) unrelated to criminal activity, such as
immigration violations, national security
concerns, public safety issues, or other grounds
defined by the local state's immigration and
deportation laws.)
Calls of the return of the fugitive to the State or Undesirable alien may be deported to a State
origin (extradition focuses on returning a fugitive other than his own or the State of origin
to the state of origin at the request of that state
for criminal proceedings)
Principle of Dual Criminality - The principle of dual criminality in extradition is quite straightforward. It means that for a
person to be extradited from one country to another, the behavior or action they are accused of must be considered a
crime in both the country requesting extradition and the country that has been asked to extradite the person.
In simpler terms, if something is not a crime in one of these countries, extradition cannot happen. For example, if a
person is accused of a specific offense in Country A and they are found in Country B, the authorities in Country B will
only agree to extradite that person if the behavior they are accused of is also considered a crime in Country B. If it's not
a crime in Country B, extradition would typically not take place.
This principle helps ensure that extradition is based on shared legal standards, so a person can't be extradited for
something that's not considered a crime in the country they are in. It's a way to protect individuals from being sent to
face charges that aren't recognized as criminal in the country where they are found.
Principle of Specialty - The principle of specialty in extradition means that when a person is extradited from one country
to another, they can only be tried for the specific crime or offenses that are listed in the extradition treaty between
those two countries.
In other words, if a person is sent from one country to another for a particular crime, the second country cannot put
them on trial for different crimes unless there's an agreement or an exception. The extradition treaty essentially acts as
a "menu" of allowed offenses, and the person can only be "served" with the charges listed on that menu.
However, there is a way around this rule. If the country that is receiving the extradited person agrees to it, they can be
tried for a crime that's not on the menu. This would require the consent or lack of objection from the requested country.
So, without this consent, the person can only be tried for the specific offenses listed in the treaty to ensure a fair and
agreed-upon extradition process.
Procedure for extradition when a foreign State requests from the Philippines
1. File/issue request through diplomatic representative with:
a. Decision of conviction- This document serves to provide evidence that the individual has been convicted
of a crime in the requesting State. It typically includes details such as the name of the convicted person,
the nature of the crime, the date of conviction, and the sentence imposed. The purpose is to
demonstrate that the individual is indeed a criminal offender in the requesting State, justifying their
extradition.
b. Criminal charge and warrant of arrest- These documents detail the specific criminal charge(s) for which
the individual is sought in the requesting State. The criminal charge outlines the offense in question, and
the warrant of arrest is an official order from a court or law enforcement agency authorizing the arrest
of the individual. These documents are essential to identify the alleged crime and the legal basis for
arrest and extradition.
c. Recital of facts- This is a narrative document that provides an account of the relevant facts and
circumstances surrounding the alleged crime. It helps the authorities in the requested State understand
the case and the basis for the extradition request. It may include a chronological description of events,
witness statements, and other relevant information.
d. Text of applicable law designating the offense- This document includes the legal provisions or statutes
from the laws of the requesting State that describe the specific offense for which the individual is
wanted. It helps ensure that the crime is recognized and punishable in both the requesting and
requested States, as required by the principle of dual criminality.
e. Pertinent papers- This category may encompass various additional documents or evidence related to
the case, such as witness statements, forensic reports, or any other relevant information that supports
the extradition request. These documents serve as supporting evidence to strengthen the case for
extradition.
2. Department of Foreign Affairs forwards request to Department of Justice.
3. Department of Justice files petition for extradition with Regional Trial Court.
4. Upon receipt of a petition for extradition and its supporting documents, the judge must study them and make,
as soon as possible, a prima facie finding whether (a) they are sufficient in form and substance, (b) they show
compliance with the Extradition Treaty and Law, and (c) the person sought is extraditable. At his discretion, the
judge may require the submission of further documentation or may personally examine the affiants and
witnesses of the petitioner. If, in spite of this study and examination, no prima facie finding is possible, the
petition may be dismissed at the discretion of the judge.
5. On the other hand, if the presence of a prima facie case is determined, then the magistrate must immediately
issue a warrant for the arrest of the extraditee, who is at the same time summoned to answer the petition and
to appear at scheduled summary hearings.
6. Hearing (provide counsel de officio if necessary);
7. Appeal to CA within ten days whose decision shall be final and executory;
8. Decision forwarded to DFA through the DOJ;
9. Individual placed at the disposal of the authorities of requesting State – costs and expenses to be shouldered by
requesting State.
Note: The Philippines has extradition treaties with Australia, Canada, the Federated States of Micronesia, Hong
Kong, Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, the United States of America and Thailand.
INTERPOL - Interpol whose full name is the International Criminal Police Organization is an organization facilitating
international police cooperation. It is the world’s largest international police organization which facilitates cross- border
police cooperation and supports and assists all organizations, authorities and services whose mission is to prevent or
combat international crimes. At present there are 195 member countries in the INTERPOL although it may change over
time.
In every member country, there's a top-ranking official, usually called the head of the National Central Bureau (NCB).
This official serves as the primary link between their country's law enforcement agencies and INTERPOL, which is like the
worldwide police headquarters. They manage international police communications and collaboration for their country.
In the Philippines, the agency that serves as our NCB is the Philippine Center on Transnational Crime, which is headed by
Police Director Felizardo Serapio Jr. (RET)
NCBs serve as global communication hubs, enabling countries to exchange crucial crime-related information through a
secure network called I-24/7. They function as intermediaries, both seeking and sharing crime data with other countries,
supporting investigations on a worldwide scale.
INTERPOL's role is to facilitate cooperation, intelligence-sharing, and the exchange of information among law
enforcement agencies worldwide to address these and other international crimes. Its work is essential in the global
effort to maintain law and order, protect human rights, and promote security across borders.
INTERPOL’S STRUCTURE
General Assembly
Executive Committee
General Secretariat
National Central Bureaus
Advisers
The commission for the control of Interpol’s files
1. General Assembly- compose of delegates appointed by the governments of member countries. It is the Interpol’s
governing body, meets once a year and takes all the major decisions affecting general policy, the resources needed
for international cooperation, working methods, finances and program of activities. It also elects the organization’s
executive committee.
2. Executive Committee- it is an Interpol’s select deliberative organ which meets three times a year usually in march,
July and immediately before the general assembly.
Secretary general- appointed by the General Assembly for a period of 5 years. The secretary general is
effectively the organization’s chief full time official. Responsible for seeing the day-to- day work of international
police cooperation and implementation of the decisions of the general Assembly and Executive Committee.
4. National Central Bureaus- each Interpol member country maintains an NCB staffed by national law enforcement
officers. It is the designated contact point for the general Secretariat, regional offices and other member countries
requiring assistance with overseas investigations and the location and apprehension of fugitives.
The first four were designated by the president, and the last four were unanimously chosen by members of the
National Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee (NALECC) as authorized by the president through NALECC
resolution 93- 10 dated July 21, 1993.
5. Advisers- these are experts in advisory capacity appointed by the Executive Committee and confirmed by the
general Assembly.
6. Commission for the Control of Interpol’s Files (CCF)- an independent body whose mandate is threefold:
To ensure that the processing of personal information by INTERPOL complies with the organization’s
regulations.
To advise INTERPOL on any project, operation, set of rules or other matter involving the processing of
personal information and
To process requests concerning the information contained in Interpol’s files.
Ex: Imagine a person, let's call them Alex, discovers that his name and personal information are included in
INTERPOL's database. However, Alex has never been involved in any criminal activity and doesn't understand
why his information is in the database. He is concerned about his privacy and reputation.
In this situation:
To ensure compliance with INTERPOL's regulations: Alex can file a complaint with the CCF, expressing
their concern that their personal information is being processed by INTERPOL without proper
justification. The CCF would review the case to ensure that INTERPOL's handling of Alex's information
aligns with its regulations.
To advise INTERPOL: The CCF, upon reviewing Alex's case, might advise INTERPOL to reevaluate the
inclusion of Alex's information in their database. They could suggest that INTERPOL should clarify why
the information was added and whether there is a legitimate reason for it.
To process requests: Alex, through the CCF, can formally request an explanation for the presence of
their personal information in INTERPOL's files. The CCF would investigate the matter, ensuring that the
request is properly handled and that Alex receives a response regarding the information contained in
INTERPOL's files.
Roles of Interpol
• To ensure and promote the widest possible mutual assistance between all criminal police authorities within the
limits of the laws existing in the different countries and in the spirit of the Universal declaration of the Human
Rights.
• To establish and develop all institutions likely to contribute effectively to the prevention and suppression of
ordinary law crimes.
INTERPOL DNA Unit - The objective of the INTERPOL DNA Unit is to ultimately provide strategic and
technical support to enhance member state’s DNA profiling capacity, and promote its widespread use in the
international law enforcement environment.
In order to assist member states and encourage DNA profile comparison across international borders,
the DNA Unit created and developed a DNA Database together with the INTERPOL DNA Monitoring Expert
Group.
The INTERPOL DNA Database (library) introduces a data matching system with the capacity to connect
its international profile matching system to all member states using DNA profiling in law enforcement. DNA
profiles can be stored and searched across international borders using the INTERPOL Standard Set of Loci
(ISSOL).
Stolen Vehicle Database - The INTERPOL General Secretariat developed the Automated Search Facility
Stolen Motor Vehicle (ASF-SMV) database to support police in member countries in the fight against
international vehicle theft and trafficking.
IWeTS - It is a tool which will provide Member States with the capabilities to trace illicit firearms that are
seized through law enforcement investigations and activities in their countries. The value of such a system
for law enforcement is that it will make it easier to initiate the trace of a specific weapon. Furthermore, this
database will be able to enhance investigations relating to criminal and terrorism matters at both the
national and international levels.
INTERPOL Money Laundering Automated Search Services (IMLASS) - This will assist anti-money laundering
and terrorism financing investigators and analysts throughout the world to automatically compare
suspected money laundering and terrorism financing-related queries against database records submitted by
INTERPOL’s member countries.
Border and Ports Security Center - The goal of the Center will be to increase security at borders and all
points of entry by supporting member countries in the monitoring, prevention and investigation of
fraudulent and illegal activities in these areas.
3) Operational support 24h/24 - It makes available INTERPOL’s know-how, expertise and best practices to all
authorities, services and organizations world-wide, whose mission is to prevent, detect and suppress different
crimes.
Focus: The IRT is specifically designed to respond to critical incidents, such as terrorist attacks or major
crimes, providing immediate on-the-ground support.
Purpose: The primary purpose of the IRT is to assist member countries in the aftermath of significant
incidents by deploying a team of experts for investigative and analytical support.
Scope: The IRT has a narrower focus, concentrating on rapid response and assistance in the specific c
ontext of critical incidents.
INTERPOL Network of Experts - The objective of this strategy, once completed will be to enable, at the requests
of a member country, the deployment of a team of said experts, upon short notice, to any location in the world
where there is appropriate need, with the team maintaining direct links to the Command and Coordination
Center at all times.
Focus: The Network of Experts has a broader focus, encompassing various fields of expertise, including
cybersecurity, forensics, counter-terrorism, and more.
Purpose: The purpose of the Network of Experts is to create a strategy for deploying specialized teams
to address a wide range of challenges based on member countries' requests.
Scope: The Network of Experts has a more extensive scope, allowing for the deployment of
multidisciplinary teams tailored to specific needs beyond immediate crisis response.
INTERPOL Vulnerable Targets Referral Centre - The main objective of the center is to identify responsible units
and relevant experts in countries where vulnerable target protection strategies have already been developed
and have this contact information available in order to bring those with relevant expertise together with those
who are in need of such information.
Hypothetical Example:
Scenario: Country X has recently experienced a series of cyber attacks targeting its critical infrastructure,
including power grids and financial systems. The government of Country X recognizes the need to
enhance its cybersecurity measures to protect these vulnerable targets.
1. Request for Assistance:
Country X formally reaches out to INTERPOL, seeking assistance in improving its cybersecurity strategies
to safeguard critical infrastructure.
2. Activation of the INTERPOL Vulnerable Targets Referral Centre:
INTERPOL activates its Vulnerable Targets Referral Centre to address the request. The center's main
objective is to identify responsible units and relevant experts in countries where effective cybersecurity
protection strategies have been developed.
3. Identification of Responsible Units:
The center identifies that Country Y has a well-established cybersecurity unit within its national police
force, which has successfully developed and implemented strategies to protect vulnerable targets
against cyber threats.
4. Connecting Countries X and Y:
INTERPOL facilitates communication between Country X and the cybersecurity unit in Country Y. The
contact information and expertise of the relevant experts are shared.
5. Knowledge Exchange and Collaboration:
Experts from Country Y provide insights, best practices, and guidance to counterparts in Country X. This
includes recommendations on cybersecurity protocols, threat intelligence sharing, and measures to
strengthen resilience against cyber attacks.
6. Ongoing Support:
The collaboration doesn't end with a single exchange. The Vulnerable Targets Referral Centre remains a
conduit for ongoing support and information sharing between the two countries. They may participate
in joint training exercises, share updates on emerging threats, and continue to collaborate in
strengthening cybersecurity measures.
The primary objective is to identify members of criminal groups involved in international terrorist activity
through the establishment of a network of law enforcement contact officers.
The task force has put into place regionally focused projects which are designed to identify active terrorist’s
groups and their membership in specific regions.
The Task Force also solicits, collects, and shares information and intelligence, provides analytical support and
enhances the capacity of member countries to address the threats of terrorism and organized crime. The Task
Force maintains a dedicated global database of information on terrorist groups, organizations and individuals.
It contributes to investigations by assisting officers working at the General Secretariat and in member countries
by conducting research and analysis of crime trends.
This service includes the collection, analysis, evaluation, exchange, and storage of information which INTERPOL’s
headquarters receives from its member countries.
In providing this service, INTERPOL’s goal is not only to inform its member countries of new developments in the
context of criminal activities, but also to provide national law enforcement authorities with additional
information which might be helpful to the progress of an on-going investigation or contribute to the initiation of
a new one.
INTERPOL’S NOTICES
INTERPOL notices serve as a communication tool for member countries, facilitating international police
cooperation in various law enforcement matters. INTERPOL notices are distributed to law enforcement agencies and
relevant authorities in the member countries of INTERPOL. The notices serve as a means of communication and
cooperation among these countries in addressing various law enforcement matters. Here's a brief overview of the
recipients for some of the key INTERPOL notices:
Red Notice
To seek the arrest or provisional arrest of wanted persons with a view to extradition.
Blue Notice
To locate, identify or obtain information on a person of interest in a criminal investigation.
Green Notice
To warn about a person's criminal activities if that person is considered to be a possible threat to public
safety.
Yellow Notice
To help locate missing persons, often minors, or to help identify persons who are unable to identify
themselves.
Black Notice
To seek information on unidentified bodies.
Orange Notice
To warn of an event, a person, an object or a process representing an imminent threat and danger to persons
or property.
Purple Notice
To provide information on modus operandi, objects, devices and concealment methods used by criminals.
Scenario: Suppose Philippines is seeking the apprehension and extradition of Juan who is wanted for a serious criminal
offense, such as terrorism, committed within its jurisdiction. Philippines believes that Juan has fled its borders and may
be hiding in US.
Operational Steps:
11 | LEA – 6
1. Red Notice Issuance:
Philippines, through its national law enforcement agency, requests INTERPOL to issue a Red Notice for Juan. The Red
Notice includes information about Juan's identity, the alleged crime, and the arrest warrant issued by Philippines.
INTERPOL issues the Red Notice and distributes it to the law enforcement agencies and relevant authorities in all
member countries, including US.
Law enforcement agencies and border control authorities in US receive the Red Notice. They are now alerted to the
presence of Juan within their borders.
Based on the Red Notice, US may decide to provisionally arrest Juan. This temporary detention allows US to assess
the validity of the arrest warrant and extradition request from Philippines.
Philippines having learned of Juan provisional arrest in US, formally submits an extradition request along with
supporting legal documents and evidence.
US conducts an extradition hearing to determine whether the legal requirements for extradition are met. Juan may
have the opportunity to challenge the extradition request during this process.
Depending on the outcome of the extradition hearing, Juan may be released if the legal requirements are not met,
or US may decide to extradite Juan to Philippines.
On April 24, 2023, Police Major General Benjamin Acorda, Jr. was appointed by President Ferdinand
“Bongbong” Marcos, Jr. to serve as the Chief of the Philippine National Police Force.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
The Executive Director of the Secretariat shall be appointed by the ASEANAPOL Conference upon
nomination on a rotational basis in alphabetical order for a term of two years.
The Executive Director of the Secretariat shall be a Senior Police Officer of the rank of Colonel and above or
its equivalent.
The Executive Director will be assisted by Director for Police Services and Director for Plans and
Programmes shall be a Senior Police Officer of the rank of Major and above or its equivalent.
ASEANAPOL CONFERENCE
The Conference shall be held annually on a rotational basis amongst member countries. The Conference will be
attended by the Chiefs of Police.
The tenure of services is:
a) Executive Director - 2 years
b) Directors - 2 to 3 years
During the 29th ASEANAPOL Conference in Hanoi, Vietnam in 2009, the Terms of Reference on the
establishment of ASEANAPOL Secretariat was endorsed. Kuala Lumpur was made the permanent seat for the
Secretariat.
The ASEANAPOL Secretariat was fully operational from the 1st January 2010.
Objectives of ASEANAPOL
1) Enhance police professionalism
2) Forge stronger regional cooperation in policing
3) Promote lasting friendship amongst police officers of member countries
ASEANAPOL Emblem
14 | LEA – 6
PARTICIPATION OF PNP PERSONNEL IN UN PEACEKEEPING MISSIONS
Peacekeeping is defined by the United Nation as a unique and dynamic instrument developed by the
organization as a way to help countries torn by conflict create the conditions for lasting peace.
Peace keepers monitor and observe peace processes in post- conflict areas and assist ex- combatants in
implementing the peace agreements they may have signed.
Accordingly, UN peacekeepers (often referred to as the Blue Beret because of their light blue berets or helmets)
can include soldiers, police officers and civilian personnel.
Various international deployments involving the Philippine National Police (PNP) in different countries:
1. Cambodia (1992-1993):
UN Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC): The mission aimed to bring about free and fair elections and to
restore stability and peace in Cambodia after years of conflict.
2. Haiti (1994-1995; 2004-present):
Operation Uphold Democracy in Haiti – International Police Monitors Component: This mission aimed to restore
democratic governance and stability in Haiti.
3. East Timor (1999-2002):
UN Mission in East Timor (UNAMET): The mission oversaw the popular consultation in East Timor.
UN Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET): This mission helped East Timor transition to
independence.
4. Timor-Leste (2002–present):
UN Mission of Support in East Timor (UNMISET): Continued support for Timor-Leste after its independence.
UN Office in Timor-Leste (UNOTIL): Provided support during the initial years of Timor-Leste's independence.
UN Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste (UNMIT): Supported Timor-Leste's development and stability.
5. Kosovo (1999-2009):
UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK): Aimed to provide interim governance and facilitate the
development of self-governing institutions in Kosovo.
6. Iraq (2003-2004):
Philippine Humanitarian Contingent in Iraq (PHCI): Involved in humanitarian efforts during the Iraq War.
7. Liberia (2004–present):
UN Mission in Liberia (UNMIL): Worked to stabilize Liberia and support its transition to peace.
8. Afghanistan (2004–2009):
UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA): A mission aimed at assisting the Afghan government in various
aspects, including security and development.
9. The Sudan (Southern) (2005–present):
UN Mission in the Sudan (UNMIS): Focused on supporting the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace
Agreement in Southern Sudan.
10. Côte d'Ivoire (2005-07):
UN Operation in Côte d'Ivoire (ONUCI): Aimed at maintaining peace and stability in Côte d'Ivoire.
11. Nepal (2007-2008):
UN Mission in Nepal (UNMIN): Assisted in the monitoring of the arms and armies during the peace process in
Nepal.
12. Georgia (2007–2009):
UN Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG): Focused on monitoring and reporting on the situation in Georgia.
13. Lebanon (2008):
UN Independent International Investigation Commission in Lebanon (UNIIIC): Investigated the assassination of
former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.
14. The Sudan (Western) (2008–present):
UN-African Union Hybrid Mission in Darfur (UNAMID): A joint mission aimed at bringing stability to the Darfur
region of Sudan.
These missions reflect the Philippines' contributions to international peacekeeping efforts under the umbrella of
the United Nations and other international organizations.
Among the luminaries of the PNP Contingent is Police Director Rodolfo A Tor, who became the first Filipino
police commissioner of a UN operation. In 2006, he was tasked to head the UN Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste, one of
the largest civilian police operations established by the UN. The PNP Contingent's first female member was
noncommissioned Senior Police Officer 2 Ester A Mardicas (deployed to East Timor in August 1999), while its first
female police commissioned officer was Police Inspector Aurisa I Mitra (deployed to Kosovo in July 2000).
The PNP Contingent has no fatalities in the line of fire. The 1993 deaths of Senior Police Officers 4 Winston
Zerrudo and Edilberto Evangelista, both UNTAC Police, were due to non-hostile causes.
15 | LEA – 6
As of 30 June 2010, the PNP Contingent has sent 1,600-plus police officers to UN and other international peace
support operations and humanitarian relief missions. Several police officers have been deployed more than once in their
careers. It has delivered an estimated minimum of 3.5 million work-hours in the mission areas.
The PNP Contingent awaits the deployment of the Philippine Formed Police Unit, or FPU, of which creation was
approved by the National Police Commission in 2006.
References:
Garcia, M. A. 2021. COMPARATIVE MODELS OF POLICING: A Textbook for the 21st Century for Criminology and Criminal
Justice. Wiseman Books Trading Inc. Quezon City
Petralba, P.JA. 2013. Hornbook on International and Philippine Human Rights Laws. QC: Rex.
UST Golden Notes
16 | LEA – 6