0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views17 pages

SME10e SM App15

1. Several statistical tests were performed on multiple datasets, including t-tests, z-tests, chi-squared tests, and ANOVA. Key results included not having enough evidence that SAT scores or repeating strings improve with repetition, but evidence that dieters take longer to solve problems. 2. A two-factor ANOVA found no evidence of interaction between factors and evidence that advertising strategies influence sales but not media type. 3. A chi-squared test found overwhelming evidence that household income relates to mutual fund ownership.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views17 pages

SME10e SM App15

1. Several statistical tests were performed on multiple datasets, including t-tests, z-tests, chi-squared tests, and ANOVA. Key results included not having enough evidence that SAT scores or repeating strings improve with repetition, but evidence that dieters take longer to solve problems. 2. A two-factor ANOVA found no evidence of interaction between factors and evidence that advertising strategies influence sales but not media type. 3. A chi-squared test found overwhelming evidence that household income relates to mutual fund ownership.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Appendix 15

A15.1 Chi-squared goodness-of-fit test


, ,

At least one is not equal to its specified value.

C D E
1 Actual Expected
2 183 175
3 63 70
4 55 52.5
5 29 35
6 20 17.5
7 p-value= 0.6321
p-value = .6321. There is not enough evidence to conclude that applicants to WLU's MBA program are different in

terms of their undergraduate degrees from the population of MBA applicants?

A15.2 t-test of

=0

<0

A B C
1 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
2
3 First Sat Second SAT
4 Mean 1175 1190
5 Variance 28422 35392
6 Observations 40 40
7 Pearson Correlation 0.91
8 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
9 df 39
10 t Stat -1.20
11 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.1182
12 t Critical one-tail 1.6849
13 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.2365
14 t Critical two-tail 2.0227

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
t = –1.20, p-value = .1182. There is not enough evidence to indicate that repeating the SAT produces higher exam
scores.
A15.3 Time to solve the 48 problems: Equal-variances t-test of

A B C
1 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
2
3 Diet Not
4 Mean 581.95 551.5
5 Variance 2716.6 2221.5
6 Observations 20 20
7 Pooled Variance 2469.1
8 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
9 df 38
10 t Stat 1.94
11 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0300
12 t Critical one-tail 1.6860
13 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0601
14 t Critical two-tail 2.0244
t = 1.94, p-value = .0300. There is enough evidence to conclude that dieters take longer to solve the 48 problems
than do nondieters.

Successfully repeat string of five letters: z-test of (case 1)

=0
<0

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A B C D
1 z-Test: Two Proportions
2
3 Diet Not
4 Sample Proportions 0.50 0.80
5 Observations 20 20
6 Hypothesized Difference 0
7 z Stat -1.99
8 P(Z<=z) one tail 0.0234
9 z Critical one-tail 1.6449
10 P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.0468
11 z Critical two-tail 1.96
z = –1.99, p-value = .0234. There is enough evidence to conclude that dieters are less successful at repeating string
of five letters.

Successfully repeat string of five words: z-test of (case 1)

=0
>0

A B C D
1 z-Test: Two Proportions
2
3 Diet Not
4 Sample Proportions 0.35 0.60
5 Observations 20 20
6 Hypothesized Difference 0
7 z Stat -1.58
8 P(Z<=z) one tail 0.0567
9 z Critical one-tail 1.6449
10 P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.1134
11 z Critical two-tail 1.96
z = –1.58, p-value = .0567. There is not enough evidence to conclude that dieters are less successful at repeating
string of five words.

A15.4 a t-estimator of

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A B C D
1 t-Estimate: Mean
2
3 Overdue
4 Mean 7.09
5 Standard Deviation 6.97
6 LCL 6.40
7 UCL 7.77
LCL = 6.40, UCL = 7.77
b LCL = 50,000($.25)(6.40) = $80,000
UCL = 50,000($.25)(7.77) = $97,125
It does appear that not all fines are collected

A15.5 One-way analysis of variance

At least two means differ

A B C D E F G
10 ANOVA
11 Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
12 Between Groups 57512 2 28756 3.23 0.0468 3.16
13 Within Groups 506984 57 8894
14
15 Total 564496 59

F = 3.23; p-value = .0468. There is enough evidence to conclude that differences in sales exist between the three
advertising strategies.

A15.6 Chi-squared test of a contingency table


The two variables (income category and mutual fund ownership) are independent

The two variables are dependent

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A B C D E
1 Contingency Table
2
3 Income category
4 Mutual fund 1 2 TOTAL
5 1 71 13 84
6 2 59 28 87
7 3 86 55 141
8 4 87 157 244
9 5 32 145 177
10 6 58 205 263
11 TOTAL 393 603 996
12
13
14 chi-squared Stat 196.77
15 df 5
16 p-value 0
17 chi-squared Critical 11.0705

= 196.77;p-value = 0. There is overwhelming evidence to infer that household income and ownership of mutual
funds are related

A15.7 Two-factor analysis of variance


A B C D E F G
23 ANOVA
24 Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
25 Sample 13172 1 13172 1.42 0.2387 4.02
26 Columns 98839 2 49419 5.33 0.0077 3.17
27 Interaction 1610 2 805 0.09 0.9171 3.17
28 Within 501137 54 9280
29
30 Total 614757 59

Interaction: F = .09; p-value = .9171. There is no evidence of interaction.


Advertising strategy (Columns): F = 5.33; p-value = .0077. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that advertising
strategies differ with respect to sales.
Media (Sample): F = 1.42; p-value = .2387. There is not enough evidence to conclude that differences in the
medium for advertising differ in terms of sales.

A15.8 z-test of (case 1) Code 3 results were omitted.

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A B C D
1 z-Test: Two Proportions
2
3 Folic acid Placebo
4 Sample Proportions 0.0101 0.0343
5 Observations 597 612
6 Hypothesized Difference 0
7 z Stat -2.85
8 P(Z<=z) one tail 0.0022
9 z Critical one-tail 1.6449
10 P(Z<=z) two-tail 0.0044
11 z Critical two-tail 1.9600
z = –2.85, p-value = .0022. There is overwhelming evidence to conclude that folic acid reduces the incidence of
spina bifida.

A15.9 Unequal-variances t-test of

=0

<0

A B C
1 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
2
3 British American
4 Mean 238.0 252.0
5 Variance 149.9 220.2
6 Observations 263 279
7 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
8 df 531
9 t Stat -12.00
10 P(T<=t) one-tail 7.64E-30
11 t Critical one-tail 1.6477
12 P(T<=t) two-tail 1.53E-29
13 t Critical two-tail 1.9644

z = –12.00, p-value = 0. There is enough evidence to infer that British golfers play golf in less time than do
American golfers.

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A15.10 one-way analysis of variance

At least two means differ

A B C D E F G
10 ANOVA
11 Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
12 Between Groups 626046 2 313023 58.37 0.0000 3.03
13 Within Groups 1523047 284 5363
14
15 Total 2149093 286
F = 58.37, p-value = 0. There is enough evidence to conclude that there are differences between the three groups.

Multiple Comparisons
A B C D E
1 Multiple Comparisons
2
3 LSD Omega
4 Treatment Treatment Difference Alpha = 0.0167 Alpha = 0.05
5 Before 1976 After 1986 122.62 28.03 25.46
6 Canadian 78.04 24.67 25.46
7 After 1986 Canadian -44.58 25.75 25.46
All three groups differ from each other.

A15.11 Chi-squared test of a contingency table


The two variables (year and sport) are independent

The two variables are dependent

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A B C D E
1 Contingency Table
2
3 Sport
4 Year 1 2 TOTAL
5 1 116 122 238
6 2 119 92 211
7 3 29 58 87
8 4 52 39 91
9 5 48 34 82
10 6 16 33 49
11 7 26 29 55
12 8 24 21 45
13 9 70 72 142
14 TOTAL 500 500 1000
15
16
17 chi-squared Stat 23.8101
18 df 8
19 p-value 0.0025
20 chi-squared Critical 15.5073

= 23.8101, p-value = .0025. There is enough evidence to infer that North Americans changed their favorite sport
between 1985 and 1992.

A15.12 t-estimator of

A B C D
1 t-Estimate: Mean
2
3 Cars
4 Mean 165.79
5 Standard Deviation 51.59
6 LCL 157.17
7 UCL 174.41

Five minute interval: LCL = 157.17, UCL = 174.41


Twenty-four hour day (12 5-minute intervals, 24 hours per day):
LCL = 12 24 157.17 = 45,265
UCL = 12 24 174.41 = 50,230

A15.13 z-estimator of p

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A B
1 z-Estimate: Proportion
2 Exercise?
3 Sample Proportion 0.551
4 Observations 671
5 LCL 0.514
6 UCL 0.589
Total number of adults who exercise:
LCL = 205.9 million (.514) = 105.8 million
UCL = 205.9 million (.589) = 121.3 million

A15.14 Equal-variances t-test of

<0

A B C
1 t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
2
3 Activity Usual
4 Mean 57.06 87.28
5 Variance 296.18 215.42
6 Observations 67 67
7 Pooled Variance 255.80
8 Hypothesized Mean Difference 0.00
9 df 132
10 t Stat -10.94
11 P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0000
12 t Critical one-tail 1.6565
13 P(T<=t) two-tail 0.0000
14 t Critical two-tail 1.9781
t = –10.94, p-value = 0. There is enough evidence to indicate to infer that graded activity is effective.

A15.15 Chi-squared test of a contingency table


The two variables (group and improvement) are independent

The two variables are dependent

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A B C D E
1 Contingency Table
2
3 Group
4 Improvement 1 2 TOTAL
5 1 42 8 50
6 2 32 18 50
7 3 13 37 50
8 TOTAL 87 63 150
9
10
11 chi-squared Stat 35.63
12 df 2
13 p-value 0
14 chi-squared Critical 5.9915

= 35.63, p-value = 0. There is sufficient evidence to infer there are differences between the three groups.

A15.16 z-estimator of p

A B C D E
1 z-Estimate of a Proportion
2
3 Sample proportion 0.774 Confidence Interval Estimate
4 Sample size 780 0.774 ± 0.0294
5 Confidence level 0.95 Lower confidence limit 0.7446
6 Upper confidence limit 0.8034

Total number of on-time departures:


LCL = 7,140,596(.7446) = 5,316,888
UCL = 7,140,596(.8034) = 5,736,755

A15.17 =0

≠0

F = 1.00, p-value .9902 Use equal variances t-test.

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
t = 3.10, p-value = .0019. There is enough evidence to infer that job tenure changed between 2006 and 2008.

A15.18 Chi-squared test of a contingency table


The two variables (party and support for capital punishment) are independent

The two variables are dependent

110.35, p-value = 0. There is enough evidence to conclude that Democrats, Republicans, and Independents
differ in their support for capital punishment.

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
A15.19 t-estimate of a mean

LCL = 23.49, UCL = 24.04

A15.20 Chi-squared test of a contingency table


The two variables (PARTYID and SEX) are independent

The two variables are dependent

41.27, p-value = 0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that men and women differ in their political
affiliation.

A15.21 one-way analysis of variance

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
= µ4

At least two means differ

F = 21.86, p-value = 6.31E-14 ≈ 0. There is enough evidence to conclude that there are differences between classes
with respect to the number of family earners.

A15.22 one-way analysis of variance


= µ4

At least two means differ

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
F = 14.45, p-value = 5.5E-07 ≈ 0. There is enough evidence to infer that inflation-adjusted incomes differ between
2002, 2004, and 2006.

A15.23 Chi-squared test of a contingency table


The two variables (RACE and WRKSLF) are independent

The two variables are dependent

13.87, p-value = .0010. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that differences exist between the races in
whether an individual is self-employed.
A15.24 Chi-squared test of a contingency table
The two variables (PARTYID3 and UNEMP) are independent

The two variables are dependent

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
14.61, p-value = .0007. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that Americans who have been unemployed in
the last ten years have different party affiliations.

A15.25 H0: (µ1 - µ2) = 0


H1: (µ1 - µ2) ≠ 0
F = .866 p-value = .1339. Use equal-variances

t =.600, p-value = .5485. There is not enough evidence to infer that Liberals and Conservatives differ in their
intention to vote.

A15.26 Chi-squared test of a contingency table


The two variables (Year and EMPLOY) are independent

The two variables are dependent

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
2077, p-value = 0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that employment status changed between 2004 and
2008.

A15.27 H0: (µ1 - µ2) = 0


H1: (µ1 - µ2) > 0

F = 1.14, p-value = .1429. Use equal-variances t-test

t = .152, p-value = .8795. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that American who consider themselves
strong Democrats or Republicans have more education than those who are not strong Democrats or Republicans.

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Case A15.1 One-way analysis of variance

At least two means differ

Weight loss:
A B C D E F G
11 ANOVA
12 Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
13 Between Groups 189.4 3 63.14 1.78 0.1532 2.66
14 Within Groups 5533.6 156 35.47
15
16 Total 5723.0 159
F = 1.78, p-value = .1532. There is not enough evidence to conclude that there are differences in weight loss
between the four diets.

Percent LDL decrease:


A B C D E F G
11 ANOVA
12 Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
13 Between Groups 2569.4 3 856.48 32.56 0.0000 2.66
14 Within Groups 4104.0 156 26.31
15
16 Total 6673.4 159
F = 32.56, p-value = 0. There is enough evidence to conclude that there are differences in bad cholesterol reduction
between the four diets.

Percent HDL Increase:


A B C D E F G
11 ANOVA
12 Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
13 Between Groups 5595.0 3 1864.99 92.62 0.0000 2.66
14 Within Groups 3141.3 156 20.14
15
16 Total 8736.2 159
F = 96.62, p-value = 0. There is enough evidence to conclude that there are differences in good cholesterol increase
between the four diets.

© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a
license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.

You might also like